Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Mar 11;29(3):e70356. doi: 10.1111/ele.70356

Correction to ‘Domestication‐Admixed Atlantic Salmon ( Salmo salar ) Establish a Productive Population in the Wild’

PMCID: PMC13169205  PMID: 41813056

Harvey, A. C., Ø. Skaala, F. Besnier, et al. 2026. “Domestication‐Admixed Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Establish a Productive Population in the Wild.” Ecology Letters 29, no. 2: e70319. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70319.

In the Discussion in paragraph 2, the text ‘Fleming et al. (2000) observed that mature adult domesticated salmon released within a river containing a wild salmon population had a lower breeding success compared to the wild population and that their offspring displayed lower survival in comparison with the offspring of wild salmon during the early freshwater phase.’ is not correct. It should read: ‘Fleming et al. (2000) observed that mature adult domesticated salmon entering a river containing a wild salmon population had a lower breeding success compared to the wild population and that their offspring displayed lower survival in comparison with the offspring of wild salmon during the early freshwater phase.’

In the Discussion in paragraph 6, the text ‘The strayers entering Guddal are thus likely to be the result of up to 5–6 several generations of the agonistic processes of introgression versus natural selection purging mal‐adapted individuals.’ had a typo. This should read: ‘The strayers entering Guddal are thus likely to be the result of several generations of the agonistic processes of introgression versus natural selection purging mal‐adapted individuals.’

In the Discussion in paragraph 6, the text ‘For example, assuming a generation time of 5–6 years (Hutchings and Jones 1998; Jensen et al. 2022), the most direct explanation of the presence of individuals with an admixture estimate of 0.5 is an escaped farmed salmon crossing with a wild salmon one generation prior, while an admixture event four generations back in time will result in individuals with an admixture estimate of approximately 0.125.’ is wrong and should read: ‘For example, assuming a generation time of 5–6 years (Hutchings and Jones 1998; Jensen et al. 2022), the most direct explanation of the presence of individuals with an admixture estimate of 0.5 is an escaped farmed salmon crossing with a wild salmon one generation prior, while an admixture event of at least three generations after the first intercross will result in individuals with an admixture estimate of approximately 0.125.’

We apologise for this error.


Articles from Ecology Letters are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES