Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2026 Apr 20;17(5):e00166-26. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00166-26

A beneficial endornavirus enhances the fitness of the phytopathogenic fungus Rhizotonia solani

Tianxing Pang 1, Bokang Li 1, Qianqian Sun 1, Zhiping Deng 2, Chunmei Cao 3, Zhensheng Kang 1, Ida Bagus Andika 1,, Liying Sun 1,4,
Editor: Nobuhiro Suzuki5
PMCID: PMC13170352  PMID: 42003613

ABSTRACT

Although viruses are primarily characterized as pathogenic agents, certain viruses confer advantages to their hosts. The extent to which a virus can improve host biological performance, however, remains a fascinating topic in virology. An endornavirus, Rhizoctonia solani endornavirus IM (RsEV-IM), was identified as prevalent in Rhizoctonia solani isolates obtained from potato plants. Comparative analysis with a virus-free isogenic strain demonstrated that RsEV-IM infection enhances mycelial growth, sclerotium formation, stress tolerance, and fungal virulence across multiple plant species. Inoculation tests involving numerous R. solani strains confirmed that only RsEV-IM-infected strains exhibited high pathogenicity, independent of other mycovirus infections. Additionally, the secreted protein fraction of RsEV-IM-infected fungus contained elevated levels of various proteins, including those involved in cell wall degradation. This fraction not only facilitated R. solani infection but also suppressed the growth of other fungi and bacteria. These findings position RsEV-IM as a beneficial virus that widely enhances its host’s biological fitness. From both pathological and ecological perspectives, these observations are significant, as they reveal that a mycovirus can serve as a key virulence determinant in fungal populations and potentially shape microbial community dynamics in natural environments.

IMPORTANCE

Fungal pathogenicity and ecological traits have long been thought to be primarily governed by endogenous genetic factors. However, this study reveals a mutualistic relationship between an endornavirus (RsEV-IM) and Rhizoctonia solani, demonstrating that viral infection enhances fungal virulence and ecological fitness. RsEV-IM stimulates fungal growth and the secretion of cell wall-degrading enzymes, resulting in a severe disease phenotype. Ecologically, RsEV-IM-infected fungi potentially gain a competitive advantage over soil microbiota. These findings present a key example of a virus acting as an essential extrachromosomal determinant of fungal pathogenicity and ecosystem interactions. Our results advance the understanding of fungal virulence mechanisms and underscore the broader significance of beneficial virus-fungus associations in agriculture and microbial ecology.

KEYWORDS: mycovirus, phytopathogenic fungus, mutualism, virulence, Rhizotonia solani

INTRODUCTION

Pathogenic interactions between viruses and their hosts are often more emphasized due to the detrimental impacts of viruses on human and animal health, as well as agricultural production (1, 2). In fact, extensive studies of viruses infecting various organisms have revealed that cryptic and/or persistent infections are more common, often suggesting a commensalistic relationship with their hosts (35). On the other hand, a growing number of studies have demonstrated mutualistic virus-host interactions, in which viruses provide certain benefits to their hosts or directly promote advantageous host phenotypes (6). Nevertheless, the impacts of the majority of viruses on their hosts remain largely obscure, highlighting the need for further extensive investigation to deepen our understanding of the cellular and ecological roles of viruses in nature.

A vast number of mycoviruses have been identified from diverse fungal taxa (7). Although the majority of mycoviruses appear to be asymptomatic, many have been observed to negatively affect host phenotypes. In particular, numerous mycoviruses identified in phytopathogenic fungi attenuate fungal virulence (8). Notably, a number of mycoviruses have also been found to be beneficial to their hosts (9). The enhancement of fungal virulence phenotypes (hypervirulence) by mycovirus infection has been documented in some plant, insect, and mammalian pathogenic fungi (1016). However, it remains unclear whether these mycovirus-induced hypervirulence effects are specific to fungal strains with particular genetic backgrounds or whether a mycovirus could serve as a key virulence determinant across fungal populations in nature.

Endornaviruses are members of the family Endornaviridae, characterized by non-encapsidated, linear, positive-sense RNA genomes containing a single open reading frame (ORF) that encodes a large polyprotein (17). Endornaviruses were initially identified in crop plants such as bean, rice, and pepper, with general characteristics of persistent and cryptic infections (18). Subsequently, endornavirus or endornavirus-like viruses have also been identified in fungi and oomycetes (19). Currently, the family Endornaviridae is divided into two officially recognized genera, Alphaendornavirus and Betaendornavirus, based on genome size and phylogenetic relationships (17), while a novel genus, Gammaendornavirus, was recently proposed (20). The effects of endornavirus infection on fungal hosts have not been clearly demonstrated, although some studies have suggested antagonistic effects on growth, stress tolerance, and virulence (21, 22). A recent study showed an enhancing effect of co-infection with two endornaviruses on the virulence of the oomycete host (23).

Rhizoctonia solani Kühn (teleomorph: Thanatephorus cucumeris) is a necrotrophic, soil-borne phytopathogenic fungus that affects a wide range of economically important crop plants worldwide (24). R. solani is a fungal species complex whose subspecific groups are classified according to hyphal anastomosis interactions, termed anastomosis groups (AGs) (25). In potatoes, R. solani causes stem canker or black scurf diseases (26). Among the several AGs known to infect potato, AG-3PT (potato type), a subgroup of AG-3, is considered the predominant and most aggressive causal agent of Rhizoctonia disease in potatoes (27). Using transcriptomic analysis, a number of candidate genes potentially involved in R. solani pathogenicity have been identified (28, 29). However, the difficulty in transforming R. solani has impeded further detailed molecular and genetic studies on its pathogenicity. Diverse mycoviruses have been identified in R. solani, but their impacts on the host remain largely unknown (3032).

In this study, we examined the effects of infection by an endornavirus named Rhizoctonia solani endornavirus IM (RsEV-IM) in R. solani. RsEV-IM infection was observed to promote fungal growth and appeared to be a determining factor for fungal virulence. Our results demonstrate a mutualistic interaction between a mycovirus and a phytopathogenic fungus, with significant pathological and potential ecological impacts.

RESULTS

An endornavirus (RsEV-IM) with growth-promoting effects is prevalent in R. solani strains

We collected 101 R. solani strains isolated from potato plants grown in the five different banners/counties of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China (Fig. S1). Total RNAs extracted from these strains were pooled and subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) and subsequent bioinformatic analyses. Numerous virus-related sequences were obtained from the data set. One large virus contig with a complete open reading frame (ORF, contig DN1616, 18,589 nt) was particularly notable due to its high read numbers (Fig. S2). BLASTx analysis (local BLASTx) revealed that this contig had sequence similarity to endornaviruses, with the highest identity (24.34%, bitscore 1613) to R. solaniRhizoctonia solani endornavirus 5 (Acc. No. QDW65432.1). The complete viral genome sequence was obtained through rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) and RT-PCR and deposited in GenBank (Acc. No. OP763640). This virus is tentatively named Rhizoctonia solani endornavirus IM (RsEV-IM).

The RsEV-IM genome is 18,636 nt in length, with a nick identified at the nt position 89 in the coding region through 5′ RACE (Fig. 1A). Many members of the genus Alphaendornavirus contain a site-specific nick near the 5′ end of the genome, although its implication in virus replication remains unknown (18). Notably, in Rhizoctonia cerealis endornavirus 1, the closest relative to RsEV-IM based on RdRp domain sequences, a nick was not found in the genome (33). The RsEV-IM genome consists of 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (61 and 47 nt, respectively) flanking a large ORF encoding a potential polyprotein with conserved methyltransferase (MTR), helicase (HEL), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) motifs (Fig. 1A). Additionally, a putative cysteine-rich region (CRR) with three conserved signature sequences “CXCC” (20) was identified between the MTR and HEL domains (Fig. S3). Phylogenetic analysis based on the RdRp domain sequences of selected endornaviruses and endornavirus-like viruses showed that RsEV-IM clusters with members of the genus Alphaendornavirus (Fig. S4). Multiple sequence alignment revealed that the RdRp domain of RsEV-IM shares six conserved motifs with those of alphaendornaviruses (Fig. S5). Notably, although RsEV-IM exhibits the most similarity in RdRp domain sequences and genome size (>11.9 kb) to those of alphaendornaviruses, it encodes an MTR domain typically found in betaendornaviruses (18). Overall, our analyses suggest that RsEV-IM is a candidate member of the genus Alphaendornavirus.

Fig 1.

Comprehensive analysis of RsEV-IM virus showing genome organization, RT-PCR detection across R. solani strains, geographic prevalence, detection methods, and phenotypic differences between Rs80 and EV-free strains under stress conditions.

Molecular and biological characteristics of RsEV-IM. (A) Schematic representation (not to scale) of genome structure of RsEV-IM. Colored boxes represent open reading frames (ORFs) and black lines represent 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs). Nucleotide positions of ORFs and UTRs are indicated. The relative positions of conserved domains in the encoded protein are shown in ORF (gray areas): RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), helicase (Hel), cysteine-rich region (CRR), and methyltransferase (MTR). The sequences surrounding a nick at the nt position 89 in the coding region were presented. (B) The representative results of RT-PCR detection of RsEV-IM in different R. solani AG strains. (C) Summary of RsEV-IM prevalence in R. solani strains obtained from different areas in Inner Mongolia as determined by RT-PCR detection. (D) Detection of virus in Rs80 and RsEV-IM-cured strains (EV-free) by dsRNA, RNA blot, and RT-PCR analyses. (E) Phenotypic growth and sclerotium formation of Rs80 and EV-free strains on PDA medium (60 mm plate; imaged at 3 days). Colony and sclerotial areas, where mycelial mat is covered with sclerotia, are shown (mean ± SD, n = 3). Sclerotial areas are outlined with dashed circles. Asterisks indicate significance (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001; Student’s t-test). (F) Phenotypic growth of Rs80 and EV-free strains on PDA medium (60 mm plate; imaged at 3 days) supplemented with stress-inducing agents (Congo red; cell wall stress, NaCl; osmotic stress, H2O2; oxidative stress). Colony (mean ± SD, n = 3) was shown here (asterisks as above).

Analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region indicated that the isolated fungal strains (101 strains) predominantly belong to the AG-3 group (79%), while the remaining strains belong to the AG-1, AG-6, and AG-7 groups. RT-PCR detection was performed to investigate the prevalence of RsEV-IM in the fungal strains. The results revealed that 66% of AG-3 strains and 27% of AG-1 strains were positive for RsEV-IM infection, whereas none of the AG-6 and AG-7 strains tested positive for RsEV-IM (Fig. 1B and C). It was also noted that RsEV-IM-infected AG-3 strains were obtained from every area where fungal strains were collected (Fig. 1C), suggesting that RsEV-IM is highly prevalent and widely distributed in potato-growing areas of Inner Mongolia region.

To further study RsEV-IM in detail, one fungal strain (Rs80, AG-3) was selected due to its single dsRNA profile (Fig. S6). However, further NGS analysis ( SRA Acc. No. PRJNA1436850) revealed that the Rs80 strain was also infected with a novel fusarivirus (a positive-sense RNA virus, family Fusariviridae), tentatively named Rhizoctonia solani fusarivirus IM (RsFV-IM, GenBank Acc. No. PV941035, Fig. S7). As viroid-like elements/RNAs have recently been found in fungi (34, 35), we used the Vdsearch pipeline (36) on Rs80 NGS data to detect such elements. Two viroid-like RNA sequences were identified and are tentatively named Rhizoctonia solani viroid-like RNA1 (RsvlRNA1, GenBank Acc. No. PZ134370) and Rhizoctonia solani viroid-like RNA2 (RsvlRNA2, GenBank Acc. No. PZ134372, Fig. S8). In attempts to cure Rs80 of RsEV-IM infection, we performed multiple rounds of hyphal tipping (Fig. S9), one RsEV-IM-free isogenic strain (referred to as EV-free) was obtained, as confirmed by dsRNA, RNA blot, and RT-PCR analyses. Meanwhile, the strain still retained RsFV-IM infection and the presence of RsvlRNA1 and RsvlRNA2 (Fig. 1D and S8). Interestingly, the EV-free strain exhibited a significantly slower growth rate and reduced sclerotium formation compared to the Rs80 strain when cultured on PDA medium (Fig. 1E), suggesting that RsEV-IM infection promotes the fungal growth. RsEV-IM-infected fungal strains regenerated from sclerotia (Fig. S10), suggesting that RsEV-IM can be stably maintained during long-term survival of R. solani under harsh environmental conditions. Moreover, the EV-free strain also showed smaller colonies than the Rs80 strain when cultured on PDA medium supplemented with stress-inducing agents or fungicides (Fig. 1F and S11). Notably, cell membrane, osmotic, and oxidative stressors (Congo red, NaCl, and H2O2, respectively) had a lesser impact on the growth of the RsEV-IM infected strain compared to the EV-free strain, suggesting that RsEV-IM infection enhances the stress tolerance of its fungal host, R. solani.

RsEV-IM infection is associated with the strong pathogenicity of R. solani strains

To examine the effect of RsEV-IM infection on R. solani pathogenicity in potato and other plant species, Rs80 and EV-free strains were inoculated into the lower stems of young potato, tomato, and N. benthamiana plants, as well as young seedlings of pepper, cucumber, watermelon, and radish. Strikingly, we observed two clearly contrasted symptoms induced between the RsEV-IM-free and EV-free strains. At 7–13 days post-inoculation (dpi), the Rs80 strain induced severe stem rot in all tested plants, causing heavy rotting of the stems and eventual plant death. In contrast, plants inoculated with the EV-free strain remained vigorous until the last observation period (18 dpi), developing only small fungal lesions at the inoculation sites (Fig. 2A). The disease phenotype of each fungal strain was consistently observed in all replicate tested plants (at least three plants), and no diversity in the degree of disease severity was observed. In a separate experiment, potato tuber seeds were planted in soil artificially infested with Rs80 or EV-free strain mycelia. By 14 days after planting, all potato plants grown in Rs80-infested soil had died, whereas those in EV-free-infested soil remained asymptomatic and healthy (Fig. 2B). These results demonstrate that RsEV-IM infection significantly enhances the virulence of R. solani strain Rs80.

Fig 2.

Comparison of stem rot development in potato plants infected with R. solani strains showing reduced pathogenicity in EV-free versus Rs80 strain. Bar chart quantifies RsEV-IM accumulation levels in Rs80, Rs7, and Rs10 strains.

Effects of RsEV-IM infection on pathogenicity of R. solani strains. (A) Development of stem rot in lower stems of potato and other plant species inoculated with Rs80 and EV-free strains. Insets present close-up views of the inoculated stems (Magnification: 5×). Plants were photographed at 7–13 days post-inoculation (dpi). The presented image is representative of three inoculated plants. (B) Potato seeds grown on soils artificially infested with Rs80 and EV-free strains. Plants were photographed at 14 days after planting. (C) Development of stem rot in lower stems of potato plants inoculated with different R. solani AG-3 strains. Plants were photographed at 7 dpi. The presence of RsEV-IM and/or RsFV-IM in each fungal strain is indicated below the plant image. (D) Development of stem rot in lower stems of potato plants inoculated with Rs80, Rs7, and Rs10 strains. The presented image is representative of three inoculated plants. (E) Relative RsEV-IM accumulation levels in Rs80, Rs7, and Rs10 strains analyzed by RT-qPCR (mean ± SD, n = 3). The value from the Rs80 sample was normalized to 1.00. Different letters indicate significance (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).

To further investigate whether the association between RsEV-IM infection and strong pathogenicity is widespread among R. solani strains, we conducted fungal inoculation assays using 40 R. solani strains (all AG-3) collected in this study. These strains appear to harbor different mycoviruses as indicated by heterogeneous dsRNA profiles (Fig. S6). The presence or absence of RsEV-IM, RsFV-IM, RsvlRNA1, and RsvlRNA2 in the fungal strains was confirmed by RT-PCR. These strains were inoculated onto the seven plant species described earlier. Overall, the inoculation tests revealed a strong correlation between RsEV-IM infection and the induction of severe stem rot (plant death) across plant species, irrespective of the presence of RsFV-IM, RsvlRNA1, and RsvlRNA2 (Fig. 2C and Table S1). However, one discrepancy was observed: strain Rs7, despite harboring RsEV-IM, did not consistently induce severe stem rot in all tested plant species (Fig. 2D and Table S1). Additionally, strain Rs10 stood out due to its faster induction of plant death compared to other strains (Fig. 2D). Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis showed that RsEV-IM accumulation was lower in Rs7 than in Rs80, whereas it was higher in Rs10 than in Rs80 (Fig. 2E). This suggests that RsEV-IM accumulation levels influence the virulence potential of R. solani. In addition, fungal inoculation assays using both RsEV-IM-free and -infected AG-1 strains also showed a correlation between RsEV-IM infection and severe stem rot (Fig. S12). Together, these findings suggest that RsEV-IM plays a determining role in R. solani pathogenicity in a wide variety of plant species.

Virus inoculation and RNA interference (RNAi) confirm that RsEV-IM is responsible for enhanced growth and pathogenicity of R. solani strains

To further confirm that RsEV-IM is the causative agent for the enhanced biological traits in R. solani, we attempted to inoculate EV-free and other RsEV-IM-free fungal strains (Rs2, Rs3, and Rs4) by directly applying total RNA extracted from the Rs80 strain to the fungal mycelia (Fig. 3A). Rs3 and Rs4 carried RsFV-IM, whereas Rs2 did not (Fig. 2C). After successive subculturing of the treated mycelia, RsEV-IM was stably detected in these fungal strains via RT-PCR and dsRNA extraction (Fig. 3B), indicating successful viral inoculation through this method. Notably, RsFV-IM was also detected in Rs2 (Fig. 3B), indicating that RsFV-IM was also transmitted through this method. Consistent with our previous observations, the RsEV-IM-infected strains exhibited enhanced growth, high virulence, and increased stress tolerance (Fig. 3C and D, and Fig. S13).

Fig 3.

Multi-panel workflow showing RsEV-IM virus inoculation effects in fungal strains and suppression by siRNA. RT-PCR confirms viral detection. Virus increases mycelial growth and plant pathogenicity. Specific siRNAs reduce viral levels in Rs80 and Rs10.

Inoculation of RsEV-IM and RNAi-mediated suppression of RsEV-IM. (A) An illustration depicting the experimental procedure for inoculation of fungal strains with RsEV-IM. (B) Detection of RsEV-IM and RsFV-IM in fungal strains after virus inoculation by RT-PCR and dsRNA analyses. (C) Mycelial growth of fungal strains that had been inoculated with RsEV-IM on PDA medium (60 mm plate; imaged at 3 days). Colony areas (mean ± SD, n = 3) are shown. Asterisks indicate significance (**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001; Student’s t-test). (D) Development of stem rot in lower stems of N. benthamiana inoculated with fungal strains that had been inoculated with RsEV-IM. Insets present close-up views of the inoculated stems (Magnification: 5×). Plants were photographed at 10 days post-inoculation (dpi). The presented image is representative of three inoculated plants. (E) An illustration of the procedure for applying exogenous siRNAs to fungal mycelia, either cultured on PDA medium or inoculated on a plant’s lower stem. (F) Mycelial growth of Rs80 and Rs10 strains treated with non-specific (ns) or RsEV-IM-specific siRNAs on PDA medium (60 mm plate; imaged at 3 days). Colony areas (mean ± SD, n = 3) are shown (asterisks as above). (G) Relative RsEV-IM accumulation levels in Rs80 and Rs10 strains treated with non-specific (ns) or RsEV-IM-specific siRNAs analyzed by qRT-PCR (mean ± SD, n = 3, asterisks as above). The value from the buffer-treated sample was normalized to 1.00. (H) Development of stem rot in lower stems of N. benthamiana plants inoculated with Rs80 and Rs10 strains treated with ns or RsEV-IM-specific siRNAs. Insets present close-up views of the inoculated stems (Magnification: 5×). Plants were photographed at 5 and 7 dpi. The presented image is representative of three inoculated plants.

Next, we further examined whether RsEV-IM accumulation levels are correlated with the virulence potential of R. solani (Fig. 2E). The application of exogenous siRNAs or dsRNA has been successfully used to induce RNAi-mediated suppression against endogenous fungal genes including those of R. solani (3741). To examine whether this approach could be applied to reduce RsEV-IM accumulation in R. solani, we treated the Rs80 and Rs10 strains with synthetic siRNAs complementary to the RsEV-IM genome (Fig. 3E). Treatment with RsEV-specific siRNAs, but not non-specific (ns) siRNAs, markedly reduced Rs80 and Rs10 growth (Fig. 3F) and was associated with reduced RsEV-IM accumulation (Fig. 3G). Furthermore, applying RsEV-specific siRNAs to the Rs80 and Rs10 strains inoculated into N. benthamiana stems diminished stem rot induction (Fig. 3H). These results further confirm the positive role of RsEV-IM in R. solani growth and pathogenicity and also open an alternative means to control R. solani-induced crop diseases by targeting RsEV-IM.

The secreted protein fraction from RsEV-IM-infected fungus promotes stem rot induction and exhibits antimicrobial activities

Fungi secrete diverse groups of proteins that facilitate fungal growth and host colonization (42). To investigate the role of secreted proteins in the enhanced pathogenicity of R. solani following RsEV-IM infection, we isolated secreted proteins from the Rs80 and EV-free strains and applied them to potato shoots alongside inoculation with the EV-free strain. The application of the secreted protein fraction from Rs80, but not from the EV-free strain, induced severe stem rot (Fig. 4A). Notably, the Rs80 secreted proteins alone, even in the absence of fungal inoculation, triggered stem rot-like symptoms, whereas the EV-free fraction did not (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that specific components within the Rs80 secreted protein fraction contribute to stem rot induction.

Fig 4.

Multi-panel analysis of R. solani secreted protein fractions comparing Rs80 and EV-free strains. Rs80 proteins increase potato stem rot lesions, show elevated CWDE composition, and inhibit fungal and bacterial growth.

Effects and compositions of secreted protein fraction from R. solani strains. (A and B) Development of stem rot in potato shoots inoculated with EV-free strain with addition of secreted protein fraction from Rs80 or EV-free strain (upper panel) or in potato shoots treated with secreted protein fraction from either strain (lower panel). Arrows indicate the position of fungal inoculation and/or secreted protein treatment. Shoots were photographed at 7 dpi. The presented image is representative of three inoculated shoots. Lesion length measured from the shoots (mean ± SD, n = 3) is shown. Asterisks indicate significance (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001; Student’s t-test). (C) Compositions of secreted protein fractions from Rs80 or EV-free strains analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The proportions of secreted CWDEs with different abundances at a >10-fold change threshold, targeting diverse substrates, were presented. (D) Leaf tissue treated with eukaryotically expressed R. solani CWDEs upregulated by RsEV-IM infection. Leaves were photographed at 3 days after treatment. (E) Mycelial growth of different fungal species treated with secreted protein fraction from Rs80 or EV-free strain on PDA medium (60 mm plate; imaged at 2-3 days). Colony areas (mean ± SD, n = 3) are shown. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA). (F) Growth rate of different bacterial species treated with secreted protein fraction from Rs80 or EV-free strain cultured on liquid medium. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). The data at 4 h were subjected to statistical analysis (letters as above).

The Rs80 and EV-free secreted protein fractions were then analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to investigate their protein compositions. A total of 2,157 proteins were identified, with 107 and 93 proteins exclusively expressed in the Rs80 and EV-free strains, respectively. Among the 1,957 secreted proteins common to both strains, 224 proteins showed a >10-fold increase in the Rs80 strain, while 101 proteins were reduced by >10-fold compared to the EV-free strain (Fig. 4C and File S2).

Fungal basal secretomes contain various carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), many of which act as cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs) that hydrolyze structural polysaccharides and play a crucial role in the pathogenicity of diverse plant-pathogenic fungi (4346). Notably, the genomes of necrotrophic or hemibiotrophic fungi encode more CAZymes than those of biotrophic fungi (47). Using the dbCAN3 pipeline (48), we identified 20 and 12 CAZymes exclusively expressed in the Rs80 and EV-free strains, respectively. Strikingly, nine (45%) of the Rs80-specific CAZymes were CWDEs, compared to only one (8%) in the EV-free strain. Among secreted proteins common to both strains at a >10-fold change threshold, we identified 80 CAZymes with increased accumulation and 19 with reduced accumulation in Rs80 relative to the EV-free strain. The increased accumulation group contained a substantially higher proportion of CWDEs than the reduced accumulation group (46% vs 5%) (Fig. 4C and File S2). This pattern of preferential enrichment of CWDEs in the increased accumulation group was consistently observed at both >5-fold and >1.5-fold change thresholds (Fig. S14). Notably, in Rs80 strain CWDEs with increased accumulation targeted diverse substrates, including plant cell wall components, fungal cell wall constituents, and bacterial cell wall elements (Fig. 4C). Other proteins commonly found in fungal secretomes, such as proteases, oxidoreductases, and lipases, were present in the increased accumulation group (File S2). Notably, the RsEV-IM-encoded protein was not identified in the secreted protein fraction.

To verify the plant cell wall-digesting activities of these enzymes, three genes encoding cellulase, beta-xylanase, and pectate lyase (showing 9.8-, 76.9-, and 205.5-fold increases in expression, respectively) were cloned and expressed in a eukaryotic system (Fig. S15). The purified proteins were infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves. Three days post-infiltration, leaf tissues treated with these proteins exhibited cell lysis and disruption (Fig. 4D), consistent with plant cell wall degradation activity.

Since the secreted CWDEs also target fungal and bacterial cell wall components (Fig. 4C), we then tested the effect of secreted protein fractions on the growth of various fungal and bacterial species. Treatment with the secreted protein fraction from the Rs80 strain (but not that from the EV-free strain) severely inhibited the growth of the EV-free strain on PDA, while the same treatment also reduced the growth of the Rs80 strain but to a much lesser degree than that observed for the EV-free strain (Fig. 4E). These results suggest that RsEV-IM infection induces fungal tolerance against the high accumulation of CWDEs. Treatment of seven other different plant pathogenic fungi showed that Rs80 secreted proteins reduced growth in all species except for one Alternaria species (Fig. 4E). We next tested the effect of these secreted proteins on bacteria grown in liquid culture. Of the eight bacterial species tested, growth was inhibited in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Bacillus cereus, and Erwinia amylovora, with the strongest growth inhibition observed for E. amylovora, followed in order by B. cereus and A. tumefaciens, but not in the other five species (Fig. 4F). This indicates that the antibacterial spectrum of the Rs80 secreted proteins is relatively narrow compared to their antifungal spectrum. These observations showed that the secreted protein fraction of RsEV-IM-infected strain has antimicrobial effects, which are possibly due to increased accumulation of various proteins, including CWDEs, proteases, and lipases.

DISCUSSION

Inner Mongolia is one of China’s largest potato-producing regions. In recent years, it has been affected by high incidence rates of black scurf disease (49). AG-3 is the dominant group infecting potato plants in the Inner Mongolia region and is thus the main anastomosis group causing Rhizoctonia disease in this area (49). In this study, R. solani strains were collected from potato plants across five planting areas in west and central Inner Mongolia. The majority of strains (79%) belonged to AG-3, and RsEV-IM was highly prevalent (52–88%) in AG-3 strains isolated from different regions. These results suggest a potential link between the high incidence and severity of stem rot or black scurf disease in Inner Mongolia and RsEV-IM infection in R. solani.

The extent of RsEV-IM distribution in R. solani populations, particularly those infecting potatoes, remains unclear. While numerous endornaviruses have been identified in R. solani strains infecting non-potato hosts (e.g., rice and tobacco), none show close genomic similarity to RsEV-IM (5052). Metatranscriptomic analysis of binucleate and multinucleate R. solani strains infecting potatoes across various Chinese provinces/regions yielded multiple partial endornavirus-related sequence contigs, though these data are not publicly available (30). Notably, characterization of viruses in two highly and mildly virulent R. solani AG-3 strains isolated from potatoes in New Zealand, using random amplification of total dsRNA, obtained partial sequences with high homology (99%) to RsEV-IM (Fig. S16) (53). This suggests the possibility that RsEV-IM exists in potato-infecting AG-3 populations worldwide. Further extensive screening of RsEV-IM infection in R. solani strains from potato-growing regions is necessary to clarify the relationship between RsEV-IM infection and the incidence/severity of Rhizoctonia diseases.

Fungal pathogenicity and its general traits are traditionally thought to be determined by endogenous genetic factors (54). However, the discovery that fungi are commonly infected with diverse mycoviruses, many of which alter the phenotypes of their fungal hosts, challenges this view (55). Transcriptomic analyses of rice-infecting R. solani AG1-IA strains have identified potential virulence gene candidates, including those encoding putative secreted effectors, CWDEs, proteases, and proteins involved in secondary metabolite production (28, 29, 56, 57). In contrast, virulence genes in R. solani AG-3 and other AGs remain understudied. Our observations show that RsEV-IM infection is associated with enhanced secretion of CWDEs as well as other proteins that potentially enhance fungal pathogenicity. This suggests that replication of RsEV-IM or the activity of its viral proteins alters the physiology and metabolism of R. solani, resulting in changes in the accumulation levels of secreted proteins. Similarly, infection with a hypovirus has been shown to alter the accumulation levels of secreted proteins in the fungal host Cryphonectria parasitica (58). The RsEV-IM protein was not detected in the secreted protein fraction, suggesting that proteins encoded by RsEV-IM do not directly function as virulence factors. How RsEV-IM induces these changes, thereby improving the biological performance of R. solani, remains an intriguing topic for future molecular studies.

CWDEs have been explored for their antimicrobial applications (59, 60). Interestingly, RsEV infection leads to increased secretion of various CWDEs targeting cell wall components of plants, fungi, and bacteria, indicating a global upregulation or secretion of proteins involved in host colonization and competition against diverse microbes. The finding of increased CWDE accumulation in R. solani mediated by RsEV-IM infection may have potential biotechnological applications.

Some previous studies have reported enhanced virulence in R. solani strains due to mycovirus infection. The presence of uncharacterized viral dsRNAs is linked to enhanced virulence in R. solani (61, 62). Similarly, co-infection with two fungal rhabdoviruses or infection with a fungal mitovirus in R. solani AG1-IA strains is associated with increased virulence (63, 64). However, because these fungal strains harbor multiple viruses (at least eight), it remains unclear whether the enhanced virulence results from interactions among mycoviruses in a host with specific genetic backgrounds. Distinctively, our findings demonstrate that RsEV-IM infection is consistently associated with enhanced virulence across diverse R. solani strains (AG-3 and AG-1) and plant hosts, irrespective of fungal genetic heterogeneity or co-infection with other mycoviruses or viroid-like elements. This consistency raises the possibility that RsEV-IM serves as a key virulence determinant in R. solani populations. Moreover, RsEV infection enhances R. solani’s growth, sclerotia formation, stress tolerance, and dominance over other soil microbes. These improved traits would undoubtedly be advantageous for fungus survival and dissemination. Thus, the comprehensive beneficial effects of RsEV-IM on its host exemplify a well-established mutualistic relationship. Collectively, these observations imply that R. solani often establishes mutualistic relationships with various mycoviruses to enhance its biological fitness in nature. These findings are critical for understanding the pathogenicity and ecological traits of R. solani, a globally distributed fungal pathogen with significant agricultural and economic impacts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection, isolation of fungal strains, and fungal culture

The diseased potato samples were collected from potato fields in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China from 2008 to 2015. Fungal strains were isolated from the junctions between potato black scurf lesions and healthy tissue using a previously described method (65). For phenotypic growth observation, fungal strains were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates at 25°C for 3–5 days. For mycelial collection, strains were grown on PDA medium overlaid with cellophane. The Rs80 strain was cultured on PDA medium for 7 days until sclerotia formation. Individual sclerotia were collected and cultured on PDA medium for 3 days before being subjected to RsEV-IM detection.

For stress-inducing treatments, fresh hyphae were placed on different stress-inducing media for 3–5 days under the same conditions as above. These different stress-inducing media were prepared by adding 10 μg/mL boscalid, 0.1 μg/mL thifluzamide, 1 μg/mL azoxystrobin (fungicides), 1 M NaCl, 0.01% H2O2, and 1 mM Congo red (final concentration) to PDA medium.

Plant growth conditions and fungal inoculation

Potatoes and other plants were grown in a greenhouse at 25°C under 16-h light/8-h dark cycle conditions. Sterilized toothpicks were used to wound young plant stems. The wounds were covered with 3-day-old fresh mycelial gel plugs (5 mm diameter) with the hyphal side facing inward and wrapped with parafilm. The plug covering the wound was removed after 24 h. Each fungal strain was inoculated on at least three plants. Inoculated plants were maintained in the greenhouse under the same conditions described above, with 80–90% humidity.

For R. solani inoculation through soil, first potato seedlings (six plants) were planted in pots (15 × 45 × 13 cm) containing soil for 1 week, and then small chopped mycelial PDA plugs fully grown on 10 plates (90 mm diameter) were added to and mixed with the soil.

Total RNA/double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) extraction, RT-PCR, and sequencing of viral genome

Total RNA and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) were isolated as previously described (66). NGS analysis of the dsRNA-enriched fraction was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) by Hanyu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), following established protocols (67). Bioinformatic analyses were performed as described earlier (68).

For viral genome characterization, first-strand cDNA was synthesized using EasyScript Reverse Transcriptase (TransGen Biotech, China). The quasi-full-length sequence of RsEV-IM was amplified by RT-PCR with CWBIO DNA polymerase (China) using virus-specific primers designed from NGS-assembled contigs. The 5′- and 3′-terminal sequences of the RsEV-IM genome were verified by RACE (Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends) using a linker adapter with 5′-phosphate and 3′-hydroxyl terminus that was ligated to the 3′ ends of heat-denatured viral dsRNA T4 RNA ligase (69). Nick was determinedusing 3′ RACE with a similar method. PCR products were cloned and subjected to Sanger sequencing. The primers used in this study are listed in Table S2.

RT-qPCR and Northern blot analyses

First-strand cDNA was synthesized as described above. RT-qPCR was performed using PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix (Kapa Biosystems, USA) on a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, USA). Fungal β-tubulin served as an internal control. Three biological replicates were analyzed for each sample, and the experiment was independently repeated three times.

Northern blot analysis was conducted as previously described (70) using digoxigenin (DIG, Roche Diagnostics, Germany)-labeled RNA probes specific to RsEV-IM (RdRp domain).

Inoculation of RsEV-IM into RsEV-IM-free fungal strains

Fresh mycelia from a 3-day PDB culture were finely chopped and placed in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. They were then incubated with total RNA solution (5 µg/µL) extracted from the Rs80 strain for 30 min. After incubation, the mycelia were transferred to fresh PDA medium and cultured. The presence of RsEV-IM in the fungal strains was confirmed by RT-PCR. Strains carrying RsEV-IM were selected and subjected to two successive rounds of similar mycelial RNA treatment to increase virus accumulation levels. The viral RNA titer in the RsEV-IM-infected strain was relatively low after the first round compared to naturally infected strains but increased following a second round of inoculation.

Isolation of secreted protein fraction and LC-MS/MS analyses

Rs80 and EV-Free strain were cultured in PDB at 25ºC for 3 days. Mycelium was removed by means of miracloth filtration combined with centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 min, and the liquid supernatant was collected as fungal culture filtrate. Ammonium sulfate was added to the fungal culture filtrates to a final concentration of 40%. After thorough mixing, the mixture was left to stand overnight. Protein precipitation was then obtained by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. The protein precipitate was washed with 40% ammonium sulfate solution, then dissolved in 1× PBS.

LC-MS/MS analysis was performed as described previously (71). Three biologically replicate samples were analyzed for each strain. The raw data files were processed using Proteome Discoverer 2.4 with the Sequest search engine against the R. solani proteome (total 12,726 entries) and RsEV-IM-encoded protein. Searches were configured with static modifications for carbamidomethylation of cysteines, dynamic modifications for oxidation of methionine residues and acetylation of protein N-termini, precursor mass tolerance of 10 ppm, fragment mass tolerance of 0.02 Da, and trypsin cleavage (maximum two missed cleavages). A reversed sequence decoy strategy was used to control the false discovery rate at ≤1% for peptide-spectrum matches, peptides, and proteins.

Label-free quantification was performed using the Minora Feature Detector, Feature Mapper, and Precursor Ions Quantifier nodes in with default settings. Normalization was applied based on the total protein intensity for each sample. Differential protein analysis was performed using the R package limma. Putative CWDEs were predicted using dbCAN3 (https://bcb.unl.edu/dbCAN2/blast.php).

Treatment of R. solani with siRNAs

The siRNA sequences targeting RsEV-IM were synthesized by Tsingke Biological Technology (China), and the assay included a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control. Sequences of siRNAs are provided in Table S2. The siRNA was diluted to 100 nM with 1× PBS buffer (pH 7.4). The three siRNAs were used as a pool for fungal treatment. SiRNAs were used to treat freshly inoculated mycelial plugs placed on PDA medium or mycelial gel plug inoculated to the lower stem of plants after 1 day of fungal inoculation.

Treatment of fungi/bacteria with secreted protein fraction

For treatment using secreted protein, protein concentration was determined using a BCA Protein Quantification Kit-BOX2 from Vazyme (China), and the protein was diluted to 0.25 mg/mL with 1× PBS (pH 7.4) to treat fresh mycelial plugs placed on PDA medium. Overnight-cultured bacteria (100 μL) were pipetted and mixed with an equal volume of the aforementioned secreted protein. After treatment at room temperature for 1 h, 2 mL of Luria-Bertani (LB) broth was added, followed by shaking culture at 37°C/28°C for 4 h. The OD600 was measured using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer every hour.

Eukaryotic protein expression and application to plant

The sequences of three genes, cellulase, beta-xylanase, and pectate lyase, were amplified via RT-PCR. The HA-tagged gene fragments were then cloned into the yeast expression vector pYES2 (digested with BamHI and HindIII) using the ClonExpress Ultra One Step Cloning Kit V3 from Vazyme (China). Protein expression was performed as previously described (72). The expressed proteins were enriched using Anti-HA Affinity Beads from Smart-Lifesciences (China), dialyzed into 1× PBS (pH 7.4), adjusted to a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL, and injected into the leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana. 1× PBS was used as a negative control.

Sequence and phylogenetic analyses

The Open Reading Frame (ORF) Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/) program and Conserved Domain Database (CDD, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/) were used for ORF determination and functional unit annotation in proteins. Multiple sequence alignments and result visualization were performed using GeneDoc and ClustalX (version 1.83). Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis of the RdRp domain was performed using MEGA (version 10.1.7) with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Conserved motifs in RdRp were predicted by MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme). R. solani proteins were searched at the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ms. Yan Li and Zhimei Bai (Technological Innovation and Talent Cultivation Platform, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University) for technical supports and Dr. Genhua Yang (Yunnan Agricultural University) for providing research materials.

This research was funded by the China National Natural Science Foundation (32170163).

Tianxing Pang, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology; Bokang Li, Data curation, Investigation; Qianqian Sun, Validation; Zhiping Deng, Formal analysis; Chunmei Cao, Resources; Zhensheng Kang, Project administration; Ida Bagus Andika, Formal analysis, original draft, review and editing; Liying Sun, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing-review and editing.

AFTER EPUB

[This article was published on 20 April 2026 with a typographical error in the abstract. The error corrected in the current version, posted on 1 May 2026.]

Contributor Information

Ida Bagus Andika, Email: ibandika@nwafu.edu.cn.

Liying Sun, Email: sunliying@nwafu.edu.cn.

Nobuhiro Suzuki, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00166-26.

File S1. mbio.00166-26-s0001.xlsx.

List of protein identified from secreted protein fractions.

mbio.00166-26-s0001.xlsx (468.7KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00166-26.SuF1
File S2. mbio.00166-26-s0002.xlsx.

List of proteins with altered accumulation.

mbio.00166-26-s0002.xlsx (58.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00166-26.SuF2
Supplemental Material. mbio.00166-26-s0003.docx.

Fig. S1-S16; Tables S1 and S2.

mbio.00166-26-s0003.docx (7.9MB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00166-26.SuF3

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Jones RAC, Naidu RA. 2019. Global dimensions of plant virus diseases: current status and future perspectives. Annu Rev Virol 6:387–409. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-092818-015606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Howard CR, Fletcher NF. 2012. Emerging virus diseases: can we ever expect the unexpected? Emerg Microbes Infect 1:1–9. doi: 10.1038/emi.2012.47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Abade Dos Santos FA, Portela SJ, Nogueira T, Carvalho CL, de Sousa R, Duarte MD. 2021. Harmless or threatening? interpreting the results of molecular diagnosis in the context of virus-host relationships. Front Microbiol 12:647730. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.647730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Goic B, Saleh M-C. 2012. Living with the enemy: viral persistent infections from a friendly viewpoint. Curr Opin Microbiol 15:531–537. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Roossinck MJ, Bazán ER. 2017. Symbiosis: viruses as intimate partners. Annu Rev Virol 4:123–139. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-110615-042323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Roossinck MJ. 2011. The good viruses: viral mutualistic symbioses. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:99–108. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ghabrial SA, Suzuki N. 2009. Viruses of plant pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47:353–384. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Xie J, Jiang D. 2024. Understanding the diversity, evolution, ecology, and applications of mycoviruses. Annu Rev Microbiol 78:595–620. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-041522-105358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kotta-Loizou I. 2021. Mycoviruses and their role in fungal pathogenesis. Curr Opin Microbiol 63:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhang Y, Guo H, Zhou S, Chen D, Xu G, Kang Z, Zheng L. 2023. A novel mitovirus PsMV2 facilitates the virulence of wheat stripe rust fungus. Viruses 15:1265. doi: 10.3390/v15061265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ahn I-P, Lee Y-H. 2001. A viral double-stranded RNA up regulates the fungal virulence of Nectria radicicola. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 14:496–507. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.4.496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Shah UA, Kotta-Loizou I, Fitt BD, Coutts RH. 2020. Mycovirus-induced hypervirulence of Leptosphaeria biglobosa enhances systemic acquired resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans in Brassica napus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 33:98–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rocha MC, Lerer V, Adeoye J, Hayby H, Fabre ML, Barber AE, Shlezinger N. 2025. Aspergillus fumigatus dsRNA virus promotes fungal fitness and pathogenicity in the mammalian host. Nat Microbiol 10:2179–2193. doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-02096-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rueda-Maíllo F, Garrido-Jurado I, Kotta-Loizou I, Quesada-Moraga E. 2025. A mycoviral infection drives virulence and ecological fitness of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. J Invertebr Pathol 209:108251. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2024.108251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Guo J, Zhang P, Wu N, Liu W, Liu Y, Jin H, Francis F, Wang X. 2024. Transfection of entomopathogenic Metarhizium species with a mycovirus confers hypervirulence against two lepidopteran pests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 121:e2320572121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320572121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lau S, Lo G, Chow W, Fan R, Cai J, Yuen K, Woo P. 2018. Novel partitivirus enhances virulence of and causes aberrant gene expression in Talaromyces marneffei. mBio 10:1128. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00947-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Valverde RA, Khalifa ME, Okada R, Fukuhara T, Sabanadzovic SConsortium IR. 2019. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Endornaviridae. J Gen Virol 100:1204–1205. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Fukuhara T. 2019. Endornaviruses: persistent dsRNA viruses with symbiotic properties in diverse eukaryotes. Virus Genes 55:165–173. doi: 10.1007/s11262-019-01635-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kondo H, Botella L, Suzuki N. 2022. Mycovirus diversity and evolution revealed/inferred from recent studies. Annu Rev Phytopathol 60:307–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-021621-122122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Luo X, Jiang D, Xie J, Jia J, Duan J, Cheng J, Fu Y, Chen T, Yu X, Li B, Lin Y. 2022. Genome characterization and phylogenetic analysis of a novel endornavirus that infects fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Viruses 14:456. doi: 10.3390/v14030456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Uchida K, Sakuta K, Ito A, Takahashi Y, Katayama Y, Omatsu T, Mizutani T, Arie T, Komatsu K, Fukuhara T. 2021. Two novel endornaviruses co-infecting a Phytophthora pathogen of Asparagus officinalis modulate the developmental stages and fungicide sensitivities of the host oomycete. Front Microbiol 12:633502. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.633502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yang D, Wu M, Zhang J, Chen W, Li G, Yang L. 2018. Sclerotinia minor endornavirus 1, a novel pathogenicity debilitation-associated mycovirus with a wide spectrum of horizontal transmissibility. Viruses 10:589. doi: 10.3390/v10110589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Sakuta K, Ito A, Sassa-O’Brien Y, Yoshida T, Fukuhara T, Uematsu S, Komatsu K, Moriyama H. 2025. Novel endornaviruses infecting Phytophthora cactorum that attenuate vegetative growth, promote sporangia formation and confer hypervirulence to the host oomycete. Journal of General Virology 106. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.002099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S, Dijst G. 2013. Rhizoctonia species: taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology, pathology and disease control. Springer science & business media. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Anderson NA. 1982. The genetics and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani. Annu Rev Phytopathol 20:329–347. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.20.090182.001553 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kiptoo J, Abbas A, Bhatti AM, Usman HM, Shad MA, Umer M, Atiq MN, Alam SM, Ateeq M, Khan M. 2021. Rhizoctonia solani of potato and its management: a review. Plant Prot 5:157–169. doi: 10.33804/pp.005.03.3925 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yang Y, Zhao C, Guo Z, Wu X. 2015. Anastomosis group and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani associated with stem canker and black scurf of potato in China. Eur J Plant Pathol 143:99–111. doi: 10.1007/s10658-015-0668-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ghosh S, Kanwar P, Jha G. 2018. Identification of candidate pathogenicity determinants of Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA, which causes sheath blight disease in rice. Curr Genet 64:729–740. doi: 10.1007/s00294-017-0791-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Abdelsalam SS, Kouzai Y, Watanabe M, Inoue K, Matsui H, Yamamoto M, Ichinose Y, Toyoda K, Tsuge S, Mochida K. 2020. Identification of effector candidate genes of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA expressed during infection in Brachypodium distachyon. Sci Rep 10:14889. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71968-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li Y, Yang N, Mu T, Wu X, Zhao C. 2023. Diversity of mycoviruses present in strains of binucleate Rhizoctonia and multinucleate Rhizoctonia, causal agents for potato stem canker or black scurf. JoF 9:214. doi: 10.3390/jof9020214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Umer M, Mubeen M, Shakeel Q, Ali S, Iftikhar Y, Bajwa RT, Anwar N, Rao MJ, He Y. 2023. Mycoviruses: antagonistic potential, fungal pathogenesis, and their interaction with Rhizoctonia solani. Microorganisms 11:2515. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Li Y, Huang X, Zhou G, Ye A, Deng Y, Shi L, Zhang R. 2024. Characterization of a novel endornavirus isolated from the phytopathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Arch Virol 169:15. doi: 10.1007/s00705-023-05915-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Li W, Zhang T, Sun H, Deng Y, Zhang A, Chen H, Wang K. 2014. Complete genome sequence of a novel endornavirus in the wheat sharp eyespot pathogen Rhizoctonia cerealis. Arch Virol 159:1213–1216. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1893-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Forgia M, Navarro B, Daghino S, Cervera A, Gisel A, Perotto S, Aghayeva DN, Akinyuwa MF, Gobbi E, Zheludev IN. 2023. Hybrids of RNA viruses and viroid-like elements replicate in fungi. Nat Commun 14:2591. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38301-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Dong K, Xu C, Kotta-Loizou I, Jiang J, Lv R, Kong L, Li S, Hong N, Wang G, Coutts RH. 2023. Novel viroid-like RNAs naturally infect a filamentous fungus. Adv Sci 10:e2204308. doi: 10.1002/advs.202204308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Lee BD, Neri U, Roux S, Wolf YI, Camargo AP, Krupovic M, Simmonds P, Kyrpides N, Gophna U, Dolja VV. 2023. Mining metatranscriptomes reveals a vast world of viroid-like circular RNAs. Cell 186:646–661. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.12.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Forster H, Shuai B. 2020. Exogenous siRNAs against chitin synthase gene suppress the growth of the pathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina Mycologia 112:699–710. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2020.1753467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Song XS, Gu KX, Duan XX, Xiao XM, Hou YP, Duan YB, Wang JX, Yu N, Zhou MG. 2018. Secondary amplification of siRNA machinery limits the application of spray-induced gene silencing. Mol Plant Pathol 19:2543–2560. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wang M, Weiberg A, Lin F-M, Thomma B, Huang H-D, Jin H. 2016. Bidirectional cross-kingdom RNAi and fungal uptake of external RNAs confer plant protection. Nat Plants 2:1–10. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wang Y, Guo Y, Guo S, Qi L, Li B, Jiang L, Xu C, An M, Wu Y. 2024. RNA interference‐based exogenous double‐stranded RNAs confer resistance to Rhizoctonia solani AG‐3 on Nicotiana tabacum. Pest Manag Sci 80:2170–2178. doi: 10.1002/ps.7962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ding X, Li X, Li Y, Guo H, Cao K, An M, Zhang C, Wu Y, Liu H, Zhou R. 2025. A novel self-assembled nanocarrier-mediated dsRNA fungicide for broad-spectrum management of Rhizoctonia solani. Materials Today Bio:102099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Girard V, Dieryckx C, Job C, Job D. 2013. Secretomes: the fungal strike force. Proteomics 13:597–608. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ma H, Zhang B, Gai Y, Sun X, Chung K-R, Li H. 2019. Cell-wall-degrading enzymes required for virulence in the host selective toxin-producing necrotroph Alternaria alternata of citrus. Front Microbiol 10:2514. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Paccanaro MC, Sella L, Castiglioni C, Giacomello F, Martínez-Rocha AL, D’Ovidio R, Schäfer W, Favaron F. 2017. Synergistic effect of different plant cell wall-degrading enzymes is important for virulence of Fusarium graminearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 30:886–895. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-07-17-0179-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Quoc NB, Chau Bao NN. 2017. The role of cell wall degrading enzymes in pathogenesis of Magnaporthe oryzae. Curr Protein Pept Sci 18:1019–1034. doi: 10.2174/1389203717666160813164955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kubicek CP, Starr TL, Glass NL. 2014. Plant cell wall-degrading enzymes and their secretion in plant-pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52:427–451. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zhao Z, Liu H, Wang C, Xu J-R. 2014. Correction: Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC Genomics 15:1–15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P, Yang Z, Busk PK, Xu Y, Yin Y. 2018. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W95–W101. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Cao C, Wang X, Xu F, Lu C. 2019. Anastomosis groups and pathogenicity of rhizoctonia solani from potato in inner Mongolia. Plant Diseases and Pests 10:18–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Urzo MLR, Guinto TD, Eusebio-Cope A, Budot BO, Yanoria MJT, Jonson GB, Arakawa M, Kondo H, Suzuki N. 2024. Metatranscriptomic sequencing of sheath blight-associated isolates of Rhizoctonia solani revealed multi-infection by diverse groups of RNA viruses. Viruses 16:1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Abdoulaye AH, Foda MF, Kotta-Loizou I. 2019. Viruses infecting the plant pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani Viruses 11:1113. doi: 10.3390/v11121113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Picarelli MASC, Forgia M, Rivas EB, Nerva L, Chiapello M, Turina M, Colariccio A. 2019. Extreme diversity of mycoviruses present in isolates of Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2 LP From Zoysia japonica From Brazil. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:244. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Das S, Falloon RE, Stewart A, Pitman AR. 2014. Molecular characterisation of an endornavirus from Rhizoctonia solani AG-3PT infecting potato. Fungal Biol 118:924–934. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2014.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Idnurm A, Howlett BJ. 2001. Pathogenicity genes of phytopathogenic fungi. Mol Plant Pathol 2:241–255. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-6722.2001.00070.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Hillman BI, Turina M. 2024. Viruses that affect phenotype and fitness of fungi, p 113–144. In Fungal associations. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Rao TB, Chopperla R, Methre R, Punniakotti E, Venkatesh V, Sailaja B, Reddy MR, Yugander A, Laha G, Madhav MS. 2019. Pectin induced transcriptome of a Rhizoctonia solani strain causing sheath blight disease in rice reveals insights on key genes and RNAi machinery for development of pathogen derived resistance. Plant Mol Biol 100:59–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Xia Y, Fei B, He J, Zhou M, Zhang D, Pan L, Li S, Liang Y, Wang L, Zhu J. 2017. Transcriptome analysis reveals the host selection fitness mechanisms of the Rhizoctonia solani AG1IA pathogen. Sci Rep 7:10120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10804-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Wang J, Shi L, He X, Lu L, Li X, Chen B. 2016. Comparative secretome analysis reveals perturbation of host secretion pathways by a hypovirus. Sci Rep 6:34308. doi: 10.1038/srep34308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Sandhu JS, Sidhu MK, Yadav IS. 2017. Control of fungal diseases in agricultural crops by chitinase and glucanase transgenes, p 163–212. In Sustainable agriculture reviews. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Bhagwat A, Mixon M, Collins CH, Dordick JS. 2020. Opportunities for broadening the application of cell wall lytic enzymes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:9019–9040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Finkler A, Koltin Y, Barash I, Sneh B, Pozniak D. 1985. Isolation of a virus from virulent strains of Rhizoctonia solani. Journal of General Virology 66:1221–1232. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-66-6-1221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Jian J, Lakshman DK, Tavantzis SM. 1997. Association of Distinct Double-Stranded RNAs with Enhanced or Diminished Virulence in Rhizoctonia solani Infecting Potato. MPMI 10:1002–1009. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.8.1002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Li Y, Lyu R, Hai D, Jia J, Jiang D, Fu Y, Cheng J, Lin Y, Xie J. 2022. Two novel rhabdoviruses related to hypervirulence in a phytopathogenic fungus. J Virol 96:e00012–22. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00012-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Wang YR, Su JE, Yang ZJ, Zhong J, Li XG, Chen Y, Zhu JZ. 2024. A pooled mycoviral resource in a strain of Rhizoctonia solani are regulators of fungal virulence. Pestic Biochem Physiol 204:106042. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.106042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Andika IB, Wei S, Cao C, Salaipeth L, Kondo H, Sun L. 2017. Phytopathogenic fungus hosts a plant virus: A naturally occurring cross-kingdom viral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:12267–12272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714916114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Yang S, Dai R, Salaipeth L, Huang L, Liu J, Andika IB, Sun L. 2021. Infection of two heterologous mycoviruses reduces the virulence of Valsa mali, a fungal agent of apple valsa canker disease. Front Microbiol 12:659210. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.659210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Lin Y-H, Fujita M, Chiba S, Hyodo K, Andika IB, Suzuki N, Kondo H. 2019. Two novel fungal negative-strand RNA viruses related to mymonaviruses and phenuiviruses in the shiitake mushroom (Lentinula edodes). Virology (Auckl) 533:125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Cao X, Liu J, Pang J, Kondo H, Chi S, Zhang J, Sun L, Andika IB. 2022. Common but nonpersistent acquisitions of plant viruses by plant-associated fungi. Viruses 14:2279. doi: 10.3390/v14102279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lian Z, Das S, Luo J, Andika IB, Sun L. 2021. Complete genome sequence of a novel ourmia-like mycovirus infecting the phytopathogenic fungus Botryosphaeria dothidea. Arch Virol 166:3461–3465. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05221-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Guo L-H, Cao Y-H, Li D-W, Niu S-N, Cai Z-N, Han C-G, Zhai Y-F, Yu J-L. 2005. Analysis of nucleotide sequences and multimeric forms of a novel satellite RNA associated with beet black scorch virus. J Virol 79:3664–3674. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.6.3664-3674.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Tan J, Feng H, Deng Z. 2025. DIA-based phosphoproteomics profiling reveals rapid cold-responsive phosphorylation events in tomato fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 219:113207. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.113207 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Martínez-Corona R, Canizal-García R, Madrigal-Perez LA, Cortés-Penagos C, González-Hernández JC. 2024. Lipase activity of recombinant KmYJR107Wp and KmLIP3p enzymes expressed in saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4742 from Kluyveromyces marxianus L2029. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 22:100396. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2024.100396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

File S1. mbio.00166-26-s0001.xlsx.

List of protein identified from secreted protein fractions.

mbio.00166-26-s0001.xlsx (468.7KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00166-26.SuF1
File S2. mbio.00166-26-s0002.xlsx.

List of proteins with altered accumulation.

mbio.00166-26-s0002.xlsx (58.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00166-26.SuF2
Supplemental Material. mbio.00166-26-s0003.docx.

Fig. S1-S16; Tables S1 and S2.

mbio.00166-26-s0003.docx (7.9MB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00166-26.SuF3

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES