ABSTRACT
As a member of the microbiome, Candida albicans colonizes the oral cavity and other mucosal surfaces of the human body. While commensalism is tightly controlled by the host immune system, the fungal determinants enabling the fungus to colonize the host mucosa without causing tissue damage and inflammation remain less clear. In search of genetic determinants that may underlie the commensal lifestyle of the low-damage-inducing C. albicans isolate 101, we identified a small sequence duplication in one allele of the Brg1 hyphal morphogenesis regulator gene, resulting in a truncated loss-of-function allele (BRG1TRUNC). Replacing BRG1TRUNC by the full-length allele (BRG1FL) resulted in a modest increase in filamentation but did not alter the phenotype of the fungus in the oral mucosa of experimentally colonized mice. Analysis of a spontaneous hyperfilamentous variant of the BRG1FL/BRG1FL derivative of C. albicans strain 101 identified a Glu-to-Lys change at position 1541 in the Cyr1 adenylate cyclase (CYR1E1541K). While the CYR1E1541K mutation led to greatly increased filamentation, expression of hyphae-associated genes, and host cell damage when tested in vitro, it was insufficient to render C. albicans strain 101 more pathogenic in the oral mucosa in vivo, irrespective of the BRG1 status. Together, this highlights that the low-damage-inducing nature of strain 101 cannot be overcome by manipulating BRG1 and CYR1, two genes with known roles in C. albicans virulence.
IMPORTANCE
During homeostasis, the fungus Candida albicans establishes mutualistic interactions with its human host. It can, however, also adopt a pathogenic state and cause infections with diverse clinical manifestations that pose a significant challenge for diagnosis and therapy. Understanding the fungal determinants that underlie C. albicans colonization under steady-state conditions may thus provide new avenues for modulating the fungus-host interaction in candidiasis patients to restore homeostasis. Here, we report gene variants in key regulators of C. albicans morphogenesis and virulence that distinguish strains with distinct capacity to drive inflammation and cause disease. Gene-exchange mutants provided evidence for the impact of a BRG1 loss-of-function allele and a CYR1 gain-of-function mutation toward in vitro biomarkers of fungal pathogenicity. However, in vivo in an experimental model of C. albicans oral colonization, none of these gene variants individually or in combination was sufficient to change the pathogenic state of the fungus. These findings indicate that C. albicans mucosal colonization is regulated by a complex gene network rather than by single genetic determinants.
KEYWORDS: Candida albicans, oral colonization, pathogenicity, inflammation hyphal network, cAMP-PKA pathway, BRG1
INTRODUCTION
Candida albicans is a common member of the microbiome in the oral cavity, the gastrointestinal tract, and the female reproductive tract (1). Despite its primarily commensal lifestyle, C. albicans can become pathogenic and is therefore also referred to as a pathobiont. Under conditions of compromised host immunity or upon dysbiosis, it can cause superficial infections that manifest as oral and vaginal thrush (2, 3). In rare cases, such as in neutropenic individuals, C. albicans translocates across the epithelial barrier and disseminates via the bloodstream to cause systemic disease, which is associated with a high mortality rate due to liver, spleen, and kidney failure, and/or fungal meningitis (2). The pathogenic impact of C. albicans further extends to non-infectious diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease and ethanol-induced liver disease (4–8). Treatment options are limited, and the rise in antifungal resistance jeopardizes the effectiveness of the few available antifungal drugs (9). A better understanding of the mechanisms governing fungal pathogenicity is needed to guide new approaches for disease prevention and therapy by targeting fungal pathogenicity determinants rather than aiming at eradicating the organisms with fungicidal drugs.
A hallmark of C. albicans pathogenicity is the fungus’ capacity to undergo morphological changes and switch between yeast and hyphal forms. While the yeast form was originally primarily associated with colonization and the hyphal morphotype with pathogenicity, this dichotomy has been challenged by the observation that both yeast-locked and hyperfilamentous mutants are avirulent in experimental infection models (10–12). Moreover, we and others have recently found that homeostatic colonization of the oro-gastrointestinal tract also depends on the capacity of C. albicans to filament, whereas yeast-locked mutants are bad colonizers in eubiotic hosts (10, 13). Therefore, dynamic morphological changes are critical for both fungal colonization and disease. Limiting the degree of filamentation and the processes associated with filamentation is essential for stable colonization during steady state and for maintaining tissue homeostasis (13, 14).
C. albicans filamentation is regulated by environmental cues that are integrated by diverse signal transduction pathways, including the Cek1 MAPK pathway, the Rim101 pathway, and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) pathway (15, 16). The adenylate cyclase Cyr1 plays a central role in translating environmental cues into PKA activation, in part by Ras-dependent mechanisms (17). Cyr1 converts ATP into the secondary messenger cAMP, which leads to PKA activation and, in turn, phosphorylation of the master regulator of the yeast-to-hyphae transition, Efg1 (18). Activated Efg1 not only drives the core filamentation response in C. albicans but also induces expression of numerous genes, including HWP1, ALS3, and ECE1. These hyphae-associated genes mediate fungal adhesion, tissue invasion, and host cell lysis, key processes in the interaction of the fungus with the host culminating in infection and tissue damage (19–21).
To limit the expression of these pathogenicity traits, C. albicans possesses hyphal repressors such as Nrg1, a DNA-binding protein repressing filamentous growth via the Tup1 pathway (22, 23). The expression of NRG1 itself is regulated by Brg1, which influences the stability of NRG1 transcripts, thus controlling hyphae formation via a feedback circuit (11).
C. albicans exhibits a large intraspecies diversity (24) with strain-specific differences at the genomic, genetic, and epigenetic levels translating into phenotypic variations (25, 26). As such, the C. albicans species comprises a large spectrum of isolates differing in their intrinsic capacity to filament, express hyphae-associated genes, and cause host cell damage, which, in turn, is further modulated by environmental and host factors. Most experimental studies have been conducted with strain SC5314, although this strain is not fully representative of the species due to its intrinsic highly pathogenic properties (25, 26). When orally administered to mice, it causes an acute inflammatory response (27). More recently, different groups, including our own, started to explore the intraspecies diversity of C. albicans and the consequences of strain variations on the behavior of the fungus at the host interface (25, 28, 29). Pinpointing the molecular basis underlying phenotypic differences between strains is challenging given the number of genetic differences that often separate natural isolates of C. albicans (30).
The oral isolate 101 is a low-damage-inducing strain, obtained from a healthy volunteer, that exhibits decreased filamentation and lower tissue invasiveness compared to strain SC5314 and is suitable for studying long-term fungal mucosal colonization (25). It persistently colonizes the oral mucosa of immunocompetent, non-antibiotic-treated mice without causing tissue damage and inflammation, reminiscent of C. albicans homeostatic colonization in humans. Yet, T cell and IL-17 deficiencies cause overgrowth of isolate 101, leading to symptoms reminiscent of oral thrush (25, 31, 32). The intrinsically low-damage-inducing nature of the strain is explained by the strong attenuation of key virulence genes, including those linked to filamentation, owing to high expression of the transcriptional repressor gene NRG1 (14). Deletion or repression of NRG1 rendered strain 101 more pathogenic by de-repressing the hyphal program (14). In search of genetic determinants underlying the elevated expression of NRG1 in strain 101, we identified a truncated BRG1 allele that was not present in other C. albicans isolates. We defined the role of the truncated allele in fungus-host interactions in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we found that strain 101 spontaneously acquires mutations in the RAS/cAMP-PKA pathway, which de-repressed several pathogenicity traits. The strong induction of filamentation and ECE1 expression observed under in vitro conditions was, however, not paralleled by increased pathogenicity in vivo. Instead, strain 101 variants preserved a largely colonizer behavior in the murine oral mucosa, highlighting that the low-damage-inducing nature of strain 101 cannot be overcome by manipulating individual genes.
RESULTS
The truncated BRG1 allele identified in strain 101 is unable to drive pathogenicity of strain SC5314
In search of mutations that may underlie the colonizer phenotype of strain 101, we established and annotated the full genome of strain 101 (BioProject PRJNA923600). The 101 genome was resolved into two separate haplotypes (BioProjects PRJNA1074522 and PRJNA1074523; see Material and Methods for details) with each eight large contigs corresponding to the eight chromosomes of the reference SC5314. The two haplotypes contained 5,829 and 5,816 annotated genes, which is lower than SC5314 (6,213 annotated genes), primarily due to the absence of annotations for ORFs smaller than 500 bp in the 101 haplotypes. The two 101 haplotypes exhibit low heterozygosity (approximately 11,000 SNPs between each haplotype).
While focusing on known C. albicans genes affecting filamentation and/or pathogenicity traits, we identified, using haplotype alignment, a 209-base-pair duplication at the 3′ end of the BRG1 gene in one of the haplotypes, creating a truncated protein due to a frameshift (Fig. 1A and Fig. S1). Amplification by PCR of the BRG1 alleles in strain 101 confirmed the presence of two distinct alleles that differ in length (Fig. 1B). The gene duplication responsible for the truncated BRG1 allele in strain 101 (BRG1TRUNC) is unique across >250 whole-genome (short-read) sequenced isolates.
Fig 1.
The truncated BRG1 allele identified in strain 101 is unable to drive pathogenicity of strain SC5314. (A and B) Two different BRG1 alleles are present in strain 101. (A) Alignment of the BRG1 region of the two haplotypes of strain 101 compared to the BRG1 locus (C1_05140W_A) of SC5314 as reference (yellow highlighted). BRG1 open reading frames (ORF) are indicated by yellow arrows below each aligned nucleotide sequence. The polymorphisms between the different BRG1 alleles are indicated by black bars in the grayed nucleotide sequences. The repeated regions (indicated by red rectangles) result in a 200 bp increase of PCR product for the BGR1TRUNC allele (see panel B). Alignment was obtained with Geneious Prime (Biomatters, Ltd.). (B) PCR amplification of BRG1 alleles in 101 and visualization of two different band sizes (1.5 and 1.3 kb). Primers BRG1-5 and BRG1-3 that were used in PCR are shown in panel A and are located at the boundaries of the BRG1 ORF, resulting in 1.5 and 1.3 kb products for BRG1TRUNC and BRG1FL, respectively, which is consistent with gel electrophoresis. Left lane: molecular weight standard (Benchtop 1 kb DNA Ladder, Promega). (C–G) C. albicans strains SC5314_BRG1/BRG1, SC5314_brg1Δ/Δ, SC5314_brg1∆/BRG1FL, SC5314_brg1∆/BRG1TRUNC (red labels), and 101 (blue labels) were assessed for their phenotype in vitro. (C) Colony morphology of the strains grown on Spider agar for 7 days at 35°C. (D) Representative images of filamenting strains upon contact with a monolayer of TR146 keratinocytes for 3.5 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. (E) Quantification of the filament length. Each symbol represents the mean filament length of 20–30 filaments per field. Data are pooled from two independent experiments with 15–20 visual fields analyzed per strain each. The mean ± SEM is indicated. (F) LDH released from TR146 keratinocytes after exposure to the fungal strains for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one well. Data are pooled from two independent experiments with four wells per strain each. The mean ± SEM is indicated. (G) ECE1, HWP1, and ALS3 expression levels by the fungal strains after exposure to TR146 keratinocytes for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one sample. Data are from one representative out of two independent experiments with three samples per strain each. The mean ± SD is indicated. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. See also Fig. S1.
The second haplotype retained a full-length copy of the BRG1 gene in strain 101 (termed BRG1FL in the following), which slightly differs from the two revised BRG1 alleles of strain SC5314 (Fig. S1). Notably, our phasing of single nucleotide polymorphisms and analysis of insertion-deletion data at the BRG1 locus for 182 C. albicans genome-sequenced isolates (24) revealed a frameshift in the BRG1 haplotypes of strain SC5314 (Assembly 22). Correction of this frameshift and glutamine-rich coding regions led to two Brg1 proteins with C-terminal sequences identical to that in the Brg1-FL protein of strain 101 (Fig. S1). The same was observed for strains CEC3672 and CEC3678 that will be described below. Given the role of Brg1 as a transcription factor associated with C. albicans virulence and biofilm formation, acting as a negative regulator of Nrg1 (11, 33), and because of the causal link between the degree of NRG1 expression and the colonizer phenotype of strain 101 (14), we decided to experimentally investigate the functional role of the newly identified truncated BRG1 allele in C. albicans pathogenicity.
We started by introducing the truncated allele, or the full-length allele from strain 101 (BRG1FL) as a control, into a BRG1 null mutant originating from the Homann deletion set (34)(SC5314_brg1Δ/Δ). BRG1 expression levels were restored irrespective of the allele (Fig. S2A). While full deletion of BRG1 strongly impacted filamentation, the introduction of one copy of the full-length BRG1 allele of strain 101 into SC5314_brg1ΔIΔ was sufficient to restore filamentation on Spider agar (Fig. 1C), indicating that BRG1FL of strain 101 is fully functional. In contrast, the truncated BRG1 allele of strain 101 was unable to do so (Fig. 1C). Likewise, the filamentation defect of strain SC5314_brg1ΔIΔ when placed in contact with oral keratinocytes (TR146 cells) to mimic in vitro the host interface of the oral cavity (in vitro filamentation) was restored upon introduction of BRG1FL in this strain, whereas it was not restored upon introduction of BRG1TRUNC (Fig. 1D and E). Introduction of the BRG1TRUNC allele into wild-type SC5314, replacing one full-length allele while leaving intact the second full-length allele, did not compromise filamentation under the same assay conditions, indicating that the BRG1TRUNC allele did not act as a dominant-negative allele (Fig. S2B).
In line with the requirement of strong filamentation for epithelial cell damage induction by C. albicans SC5314 (19), introducing the BRG1TRUNC allele into SC5314_brg1Δ/Δ only partially restored the high degree of damage in TR146 keratinocytes (in vitro damage induction) that was elicited in response to strains containing one or two copies of the BRG1FL allele (Fig. 1F). Again, in a mutant strain containing both a BRG1TRUNC and a BRG1FL allele, the truncated allele did not alter the effect of the full-length allele (Fig. S2C).
These observations suggested that the manifestation of pathogenicity traits depended on BRG1 integrity. This dependence extended to the expression of hyphae-associated genes by C. albicans in contact with TR146 keratinocytes (in vitro hyphae-associated gene expression), including the candidalysin-encoding ECE1 gene and the adhesin-coding genes ALS3 and HWP1, all of which are among the genes that were defined as constituting the core filamentation response (35). While the introduction of BRG1FL into SC5314_brg1Δ/Δ restored gene expression levels similar to those in SC5314, the BRG1TRUNC allele led to only limited expression of hyphae-associated genes (Fig. 1G). In the presence of a full-length gene copy, introduction of BRG1TRUNC had no impact on the expression of hyphae-associated genes, again confirming that the truncated allele was not dominant-negative (Fig. S2D). Together, these results demonstrate that the truncated BRG1 allele identified in strain 101 was dysfunctional in C. albicans. Although our experiments demonstrate that it does not act as a dominant-negative allele in SC5314, we speculate that in a low-damage-inducing strain like 101, it may impact the strain’s phenotype, even in the presence of an intact full-length allele.
Restoring the full-length BRG1 allele in strain 101 is insufficient to increase the strain’s pathogenicity
After finding that the BRG1TRUNC allele of strain 101 is hypomorphic, while the full-length allele is fully functional in the context of SC5314 (Fig. 1), we speculated that replacing BRG1TRUNC in strain 101 with a second copy of BRG1FL may render this strain more pathogenic. Notably, a strain 101 derivative bearing two BRG1FL alleles did not show any change in colony morphology on Spider agar compared to the parental strain 101, which bears BRG1TRUNC and BRG1FL alleles (Fig. 2A, top and Fig. S3). Likewise, the replacement of BRG1TRUNC by BRG1FL did not increase the degree of in vitro filamentation of strain 101 in contact with TR146 keratinocytes (Fig. 2B and C). Growth on agar, which also triggers filamentation (embedded growth), indicated that the allele replacement did impact fungal morphogenesis, although only under selected conditions (Fig. 2A, bottom). Moreover, longer incubation on Spider agar at 37°C revealed a mildly enhanced filamenting capacity of the mutant (Fig. 2D). However, the effect was not paralleled by a restoration of other pathogenicity traits. In vitro damage induction, which serves as a good correlate for C. albicans pathogenicity in barrier tissues (25), was not enhanced by replacing BRG1TRUNC with BRG1FL in strain 101 (Fig. 2E). Likewise, in vitro expression of the hyphae-associated genes ECE1, HWP1, and ALS3 was not enhanced, and NRG1 remained highly expressed (Fig. 2F). Together, these findings indicate that replacing the hypomorphic BRG1TRUNC allele in strain 101 with a fully functional BRG1 copy was not sufficient to alter the strain’s pathogenicity in terms of in vitro damage induction and hyphae-associated gene expression and only exerted a very limited effect in morphology.
Fig 2.
Restoring the full-length BRG1 allele in strain 101 is insufficient to increase the strain’s pathogenicity when tested in vitro. C. albicans strains 101_BRG1FL/BRG1TRUNC, 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL, 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*), and SC5314 wild type were assessed for their phenotype in vitro. (A) Colony morphology of the strains grown on Spider agar (top) or on YCB/BSA agar (bottom) for 7 days at 35°C. (B) Representative images of filamenting strains upon contact with a monolayer of TR146 keratinocytes for 3.5 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. (C) Quantification of the filament length. Each symbol represents the mean filament length of 20–30 filaments per visual field. Data are pooled from two independent experiments with 10–12 visual fields analyzed per strain each. The mean ± SEM is indicated. (D) Colony morphology of the indicated strains grown on Spider agar for 5 weeks at 37°C, 5% CO2. (E) LDH release from TR146 keratinocytes after exposure to the fungal strains for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one well. Data are pooled from two independent experiments with four wells per strain each. The mean ± SEM is indicated. (F) ECE1, HWP1, ALS3, and NRG1 expression levels by the fungal strains after exposure to TR146 keratinocytes for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one sample. Data are from one representative out of two independent experiments with three samples per strain each. The mean ± SD is indicated. (G) Close-up of a colony of 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL on Spider agar showing signs of filamentation in a subcolony. In panels C, D, F, and G, statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001; ns, non-significant (P > 0.05). See also Fig. S2.
Spontaneous mutants convert strain 101 into a highly pathogenic variant
While performing in vitro experiments with strains 101_BRG1FL/BRG1TRUNC and 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL shown in Fig. 2A through F, we observed that the latter strain, when grown on Spider agar, displayed some spikes at the border of the colony, resembling hyphal outgrowth (Fig. 2G). Material from the spike was collected and diluted to obtain single colonies. A clone generated from these spontaneously outgrown colonies, termed 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*), displayed a highly filamentous morphology under all conditions tested. On Spider agar, in suspension culture, and when put in contact with keratinocytes, the strain closely resembled strain SC5314 (Fig. 2A through C and Fig. S3). It also elicited strong in vitro damage in TR146 cells (Fig. 2E), and it displayed an in vitro gene expression profile strikingly similar to that of strain SC5314 (Fig. 2F). Together, these findings indicate that a low-damage-inducing strain can convert into a high-damage-inducing variant, as inferred from in vitro conditions.
To further investigate the pathogenicity of the spontaneously outgrown 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*) strain at the interface with the host, we made use of our experimental model of oral colonization in mice. In this model, C. albicans strain 101 efficiently establishes colonization of the epithelium, as assessed by quantification of the fungal burden in the tongue and by histological analysis of the tongue epithelium (25). In contrast, high-damage-inducing strains such as SC5314 swiftly induce a strong inflammatory response upon invasion of fungal hyphae into the nucleated layers of the epithelium (stratum granulosum, stratum spinosum), where they stimulate cytokine and chemokine production, which in turn results in an accumulation of inflammatory cells. This massive response, which peaks between day 1 and day 2 post-infection, leads to clearance of the fungus within 3–5 days (27, 36, 37). In contrast, low-damage-inducing strains such as 101 reside predominantly in the stratum corneum and elicit a non-inflammatory, homeostatic response characterized by tissue-resident Th17 cells (13, 31). C. albicans-specific Th17 cells mediate immunosurveillance to prevent fungal overgrowth, without eliminating the fungus, thereby allowing long-lasting colonization, which mimics C. albicans colonization in humans. This model is therefore ideally suited for assessing and distinguishing high- and low-damage-inducing isolates of C. albicans (25).
We colonized wild-type C57BL/6 mice with strain 101 carrying one or two BRG1FL alleles, as well as strain 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*), in comparison to SC5314. All strains colonized the tongue with comparable efficiency (Fig. 3A). Reminiscent of what we observed in vitro, in vivo ECE1 expression was strongly induced and NRG1 expression repressed in 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*), but not in 101_BRG1FL/BRG1TRUNC or 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL (Fig. 3B). Strong induction of hyphae-associated gene expression correlated with the activation of a pronounced inflammatory response. Large agglomerates of inflammatory cells accumulated in the tongue epithelium of mice colonized with high-damage-inducing isolates within as little as 1 day after infection (Fig. 3C). Concomitantly, we observed expression of inflammatory cytokines in the colonized tissue (Fig. 3D). Again, this response was limited to the spontaneously arisen, high-damage-inducing mutant, and its extent was comparable to that of the well-characterized strain SC5314. Reminiscent of what is known for SC5314, strain 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*) did not persist, but was rapidly cleared from the tongue epithelium, despite its origin from the persistent colonizer 101 (Fig. 3E). Together, this indicates that spontaneous changes converted a colonizer strain into a highly pathogenic one that phenocopies SC5314 in all parameters tested.
Fig 3.
Restoring the full-length BRG1 allele in strain 101 is insufficient to increase the strain’s pathogenicity in vivo. C57BL/6 mice were colonized with C. albicans strains 101_BRG1FL/BRG1TRUNC, 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL, 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*), and SC5314 wild type for 1 day (A–D) or 7 days (E–G). (A) Tongue fungal burden on day 1 after colonization. DL, detection limit. (B) ECE1 and NRG1 expression levels in the tongue tissue on day 1 after colonization. (C) PAS-stained histology sections of the tongue on day 1 after colonization. (D) Cytokine expression levels in the tongue tissue on day 1 after colonization. (E) PAS-stained histology sections of the tongue on day 7 after colonization. (F) Tongue fungal burden on day 7 after colonization. DL, detection limit. (G) ECE1, ALS3, HWP1, and NRG1 expression levels in the tongue tissue on day 7 after colonization. In panels A, B, D, E, and G, each symbol represents one animal. Data are pooled from at least two independent experiments except for SC5314 in panels B and D. The mean ± SEM is indicated. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA (B, D, E) or unpaired Student’s t-test (G). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. See also Fig. S3.
The mutant of 101 carrying two full-length BRG1 alleles could not be distinguished from its parental strain, which carries only one fully functional BRG1 allele, in terms of its behavior in the murine tongue tissue based on fungal burden, histology, and in vivo expression of hyphae-associated fungal genes and host genes on day 1 post-infection (Fig. 3A through D). Accordingly, the strain persisted in the tongue, as did the parental 101_BRG1FL/BRG1TRUNC, with high fungal burden one week after infection (Fig. 3E and F). Of note, no significant differences were detected in the expression of ECE1, HWP1, and ALS3 in the tongue colonized with strain 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL in comparison to the parental 101_BRG1FL/BRG1TRUNC on day 7 post-infection (Fig. 3G).
CYR1E1541K induces the expression of virulence traits in strain 101
We hypothesized that the highly pathogenic phenotype of strain 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*) was the result of spontaneous mutations arising during growth of strain 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL on Spider medium. To identify such mutation(s), whole-genome sequencing of strains 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL and 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*) was performed, and the short reads for both strains were aligned to the reference genome. Omitting polymorphisms that had already been identified in a set of 298 clinical isolates, including high- and low-damage-inducing strains, and focusing on SNPs resulting in a non-synonymous amino-acid change, we identified 17 SNPs that distinguished the two strains (Table S1). Fourteen SNPs were found in cell wall protein-coding genes (ALS2, ALS4, PGA23, FGR23/PGA40, C1_05970W, C3_01260C), as well as in the FGR28 and NAG3 genes, all of which are prone to sequencing errors because of repeated regions. One SNP was found in the CR_00470W gene of unknown function. Finally, we noticed a non-synonymous SNP in the gene encoding the adenylyl cyclase Cyr1, which leads to a Glu to Lys substitution in a conserved C-terminal motif close to the protein’s catalytic domain (position 1541). As an integral part of the cAMP-PKA pathway, Cyr1 regulates C. albicans morphogenesis (18). In response to environmental cues, it generates short-lived intracellular cAMP spikes. The Glu to Lys substitution at position 1541 of Cyr1 has been identified previously in a genetic screen for SC5314 derivatives with increased Cyr1 activity. This mutation renders the enzyme hyperactive and causes constitutive filamentous growth of C. albicans SC5314 even under non-hyphae-inducing conditions (38).
Thus, we hypothesized that the CYR1E1541K point mutation was indeed responsible for the phenotype of strain 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*). In order to assess this hypothesis, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to introduce the mutation directly into the original 101 strain. Modification of one allele was sufficient to drive a strong filamentation phenotype on Spider agar (Fig. 4A) and in contact with TR146 keratinocytes (Fig. 4B; Fig. S4A). Increased in vitro filamentation was accompanied by repression of NRG1 and strong induction of hyphae-associated genes to levels approximating or even exceeding those measured in SC5314 (Fig. 4C; Fig. S4B). Despite strong filamentation and high levels of ECE1 expression, the 101_CYR1E1541K mutant did not phenocopy strain SC5314 regarding damage induction in TR146 keratinocytes (Fig. 4D).
Fig 4.
CYR1E1541K induces the expression of pathogenicity traits in strain 101. (A–D). C. albicans strains 101 wild type, 101_CYR1E1541K, and 101_CYR1E1541K/E1541K were assessed for their phenotype in vitro. (A) Colony morphology of the strains grown on Spider agar for 5 days at 35°C. (B) Filamentation of the strains upon contact with a monolayer of TR146 keratinocytes for 3.5 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents the mean filament length of 20-30 filaments per visual field. The mean ± SEM is indicated. (C) ECE1 expression levels by the fungal strains after exposure to TR146 keratinocytes for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one sample. Data are from one representative out of two independent experiments with three samples per strain each. The mean ± SD is indicated. (D) LDH release from TR146 keratinocytes after exposure to the fungal strains for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one well. Data are pooled from two independent experiments. The mean ± SEM is indicated. (E-G) C57BL/6 mice were colonized with C. albicans strains 101 wild type or 101_CYR1E1541K and tongue fungal burden (E), PAS-stained histology sections of the tongue (F), and ECE1 expression levels in the tongue tissue (G) were analyzed on day 1 and day 7 after colonization. Each symbol represents one mouse. Data are pooled from two independent experiments. The mean ± SEM is indicated. DL, detection limit. (H–K) C. albicans strains 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL, 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL CYR1E1541K (clone #1 and clone #2), and SC5314 wild type were assessed for their phenotype in vitro. (H) Colony morphology of the strains grown on Spider agar for 5 days at 37°C. (I) Filamentation of the strains put in contact with a monolayer of TR146 keratinocytes for 3.5 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents the mean filament length of 20–-filaments per visual field. The mean ± SEM is indicated. (J) ECE1 expression levels by the fungal strains after exposure to TR146 keratinocytes for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one sample. Data are from one representative out of two independent experiments with three samples per strain each. The mean ± SD is indicated. (K) LDH release from TR146 keratinocytes after exposure to the fungal strains for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one well. (L–N) C57BL/6 mice were colonized with C. albicans strains 101_BRG1FL/FL and 101_BRG1FL/FL CYR1E1541K (clone 1). (L) Tongue fungal burden on day 1 and day 7 after colonization. DL, detection limit. (M) PAS-stained histology sections of the tongue on day 1 and day 7 after colonization. (N) ECE1 expression levels in the tongue tissue on day 7 after colonization. Each symbol represents one mouse. Data are pooled from two independent experiments. The mean ± SEM is indicated. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA (B–D and I–K) or unpaired Student’s t-test (E–E, G, L–N). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. See also Fig. S4 and S5.
The lack of high damage induction in vitro paralleled the inability of the 101_CYR1E1541K mutant to drive inflammation in vivo in the oral mucosa of experimentally colonized mice (Fig. 4E and F). The morphology of the 101_CYR1E1541K mutant in the murine tongue tissue was indistinguishable from that of the parental 101 wild-type strain, although quantification of filament length is impossible on tissue sections (Fig. 4F). Likewise, the in vivo expression of hyphae-associated genes by the CYR1E1541K mutant in comparison to the parental 101 wild-type strain was not enhanced in the tongue tissue (Fig. 4G). We were unable to test the mutant bearing two copies of the CYR1E1541K point mutation in vivo because this strain formed aggregates as a result of the hyperfilamentous phenotype, which precluded reproducible colonization of the murine oral mucosa. By day 7, when strain SC5314 is cleared from the experimentally infected tongue (25), fungal counts of the 101_CYR1E1541K mutant were still high and indistinguishable from those of the parental wild type strain (Fig. 4E). Fungal elements exhibited a mixed morphology. On very rare occasions, we found larger fungal accumulations at the tongue surface, which in some instances also coincided with small inflammatory foci in the epithelium; this was observed only for the CYR1E1541K-bearing mutant, but not for the wild-type 101 strain (Fig. 4F). This observation coincided with a small trend toward higher ECE1 and reduced NRG1 expression in the tongue tissue (Fig. 4G and Fig. S4C).
We wondered whether the phenotype of 101_CYR1E1541K was altered by the presence of two intact BRG1 alleles, as the CYR1E1541K-carrying mutant originally emerged from the 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL strain (Fig. 2G). We therefore introduced the CYR1E1541K mutation into this strain to obtain a reconstituted mutant. This resulted in a strain that largely phenocopied 101_CYR1E1541K. It exhibited strongly enhanced filamentation in both Spider agar and in contact with TR146 keratinocytes, and it strongly expressed hyphae-induced genes in vitro (Fig. 4H through J; Fig. S5A and B). However, these changes were not accompanied by enhanced in vitro damage induction (Fig. 4K). Likewise, in the oral mucosa of experimentally colonized mice, the CYR1E1541K variant did not exert a stronger inflammation-inducing effect when introduced into 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL than in the wild-type 101 background (Fig. 4L through N; Fig. S5C). We also tested whether the CYR1E1541K mutation would render strain 101, carrying one or two intact BRG1 alleles, more pathogenic when tested in the murine model of systemic candidiasis, which was not the case (Fig. S5D).
Together, the results from these in vitro and in vivo experiments indicate that the hyperactive variant of Cyr1 indeed has the potential to bypass the repression of some pathogenicity traits under strong hyphae-inducing conditions, such as those used for our in vitro assays, but it is insufficient to fully overcome the low-damage-inducing nature of strain 101 under within-host conditions, independently of the functionality of BRG1. This also indicates that filamentation and hyphae-associated gene expression under in vitro conditions are not good correlates of C. albicans pathogenicity in vivo.
The capacity of the hyperactive CYR1E1541K point mutation to de-repress filamentation and hyphae-associated gene expression in C. albicans is not limited to strain 101
To obtain further insights into the impact of the strain background on the potential of the CYR1E1541K mutation to modulate C. albicans phenotype, we turned to other low-damage-inducing isolates that exhibit similar properties in the oral mucosa as strain 101. Strains CEC3672 and CEC3678 (39, 40) both carry two full-length BRG1 alleles, including the C-terminal extension, encoding Brg1 proteins almost identical to those in the SC5314 genome (Fig. S1). The phenotype of these isolates was comparable to that of strain 101 regarding in vitro filamentation, damage induction, release of damage-associated cytokines, and the efficiency to colonize the murine oral mucosa in vivo (13). Introducing the CYR1E1541K point mutation in these low-damage-inducing isolates rendered them more filamentous, as we previously observed for strain 101, both on Spider agar and when placed in contact with keratinocytes (Fig. 5A and B, compare to Fig. 4A, B, H and I). Likewise, the in vitro expression of ECE1 was enhanced, while the expression of other hyphae-associated genes was less affected than what we observed in the case of strain 101 (Fig. 5C, compare to Fig. 4C and J and Fig. S4B and S5B). Keratinocyte damage was also increased in response to CEC3672 and CEC3678 carrying the hypervirulent CYR1 variant, compared to the corresponding parental strains, with the degree of the effect being strain-dependent (Fig. 5D, compared to Fig. 4D and K). Together, these data indicate that the Glu-to-Lys mutation in Cyr1 rendered the adenylate cyclase hyperactive (38), which led to de-repression of filamentation and enhanced expression of hyphae-associated genes in multiple normally low-damage-inducing isolates, although the point mutation was insufficient to induce full pathogenicity, as it did not elicit high cellular damage in vitro or an inflammatory response at the host interface in vivo, as inferred from our results with the 101_CYR1E1541K strain.
Fig 5.
The capacity of the hyperactive CYR1E1541K point mutation to de-repress filamentation and hyphae-associated gene expression in low-damage-inducing C. albicans is strain-independent. C. albicans strains CEC3672, CEC3672_CYR1E1541K, CEC3678, and CEC3678_CYR1E1541K were assessed for their phenotype in vitro. (A) Colony morphology of the strains grown on Spider agar for 5 days at 37°C. (B) Filamentation of the strains put in contact with a monolayer of TR146 keratinocytes for 3.5 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. (C) ECE1, HWP1, ALS3, and NRG1 expression levels by the fungal strains after exposure to TR146 keratinocytes for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one sample. Data are from one representative out of two independent experiments with three samples per strain each. The mean ± SD is indicated. (D) LDH release from TR146 keratinocytes after exposure to the fungal strains for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one well. Data are from one representative out of two independent experiments. The mean ± SD is indicated. Statistical significance was determined using unpaired Student’s t-test comparing each mutant with the corresponding parental strain. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
The Ras1/cAMP-PKA pathway promotes filamentation in intrinsically low-damage-inducing strains
Although the spontaneously acquired Cyr1E1541K mutation did not explain the highly pathogenic phenotype of strain 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*), it has a remarkable capacity to alter the phenotype of several low-damage-inducing isolates in vitro. We wondered whether the modulation of the cAMP pathway was a unique event or might occur more frequently. Prolonged growth on Spider agar spawned several filamentation events in both strain 101 and the 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL mutant (Fig. 6A and B). Clones generated from these spontaneously outgrown colonies confirmed the hyperfilamentous phenotype, which was associated with enhanced expression of ECE1, but not sufficient to drive epithelial damage induction (Fig. 6C and D). We then performed whole-genome sequencing of five of the isolated clones to identify mutations in comparison to their parental strains. Interestingly, all identified mutations were in RAS1 (Fig. 6E; Table S2), a gene encoding a GTPase that mediates Cyr1 activation in response to serum and N-acetylglucosamine stimulation through interaction with the N-terminal Ras association domain of Cyr1 (41). Several of the identified mutations have been previously reported to render C. albicans and/or human Ras hyperactive (42–44). Together, the data demonstrate that genes of the cAMP-PKA pathway are hotspots for spontaneously acquired mutations that enhance pathogenicity traits of C. albicans. However, as seen with 101-derived strains expressing a hyperactive variant of Cyr1 (Fig. 4), filamentation associated with mutations in Ras was not sufficient to drive full pathogenicity.
Fig 6.
The Ras1-cAMP pathway promotes filamentation in intrinsically low-damage-inducing strains. (A) C. albicans strain 101 wild type and 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL were plated on Spider agar for 7 days at 35°C. (B) Colony morphology of clones that were isolated from spontaneously outgrown filaments (A) when grown on YEPD or Spider agar, as indicated. (C and D) ECE1 expression levels (C) and LDH release (D) by the clones after exposure to TR146 keratinocytes for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Each symbol represents one sample. The mean ± SD is indicated. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA comparing each mutant with the corresponding parental strain. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; ns, non-significant (P > 0.05) (E) Mutations in RAS1 identified in the clones shown in panel B.
DISCUSSION
Candida albicans is a prominent human pathobiont associated with diseases that vary in severity from mild superficial forms to fatal systemic infections. Despite the pathogenic potential of C. albicans, it is, in the first place, a harmless colonizer of mucosal tissues that does not damage the host but instead rather enhances the host resistance to infection (5). The precise mechanisms enabling C. albicans to thrive as a resident of the mycobiota remain to be fully clarified. Studying isolates with low intrinsic pathogenicity and their interaction with the host has advanced the understanding of how C. albicans establishes colonization and avoids tissue damage and inflammation to preserve homeostasis (13, 14, 25). Here, we explored how the transcription factor Brg1 and the Cyr1 adenylate cyclase modulate pathogenic properties of the C. albicans colonizer strain 101. While the introduction of allele variants of the BRG1 and CYR1 genes into strain 101, either individually or in combination, increased the strain’s pathogenicity traits in vitro, it was not sufficient to increase the strain pathogenicity in the oral mucosal tissue of experimentally colonized mice. These findings underscore the tight restriction of the hyphae-associated gene network in C. albicans that guarantees homeostatic colonization in the immunocompetent host.
Defining the properties of C. albicans that govern fungal colonization versus inflammation and pathology in vivo is the subject of continuous ongoing efforts. Studies with gene-deficient mutant strains provided evidence that filamentation, hyphae-associated gene expression, and cell damage induction are critical pathogenicity traits of C. albicans associated with infection and induction of inflammation in vivo (45). As such, diverse assays have been developed and are widely used to quantify these fungal properties in vitro. Our findings suggest, however, that in vitro filamentation and the expression of hyphae-associated genes are not good correlates of C. albicans pathogenicity in the oral mucosa. This probably reflects the fact that environmental cues inducing filamentation and the expression of hyphae-associated genes differ between cell culture and inside mammalian tissues. In contrast, the induction of cellular damage in cultured keratinocytes seems to be a more reliable correlate of pathogenicity in vivo. This emphasizes that although filamentation is a pre-requisite for pathogenicity, the two processes can be decoupled, and as such, care should be taken when interpreting in vitro filamentation assays.
The newly assembled high-quality genomic sequence of strain 101 enabled us to conduct a comparative genome analysis of strains SC5314 and 101, which drew our attention to a rare truncated BRG1 allele in strain 101. Brg1 regulates the NRG1 hyphal repressor gene via mRNA destabilization (11) and chromatin remodeling (46). Our previous findings that NRG1 expression levels are decisive for the low-damage-inducing phenotype of strain 101 (14) led us to explore the functionality of the truncated BRG1 allele. Indeed, the truncated BRG1 allele was functionally defective. Replacing the truncated BRG1 allele of strain 101 with a copy of the functional allele, leading to strain 101 having two full-length, functional alleles, resulted in modest induction of pathogenicity traits in vitro; however, this was insufficient to increase pathogenicity in the oral mucosa in vivo. These data are consistent with previous reports of allelic differences in individual genes capable of modulating C. albicans-host interaction properties (47, 48). The lack of full induction of pathogenicity may, at least in part, be explained by the complex regulation of Brg1 (49, 50). We did only replace the dysfunctional BRG1 ORF with the full-length BRG1 ORF from strain 101, without directly modulating the expression levels. This ORF is almost identical to one of the two ORFs encoded by the first BRG1 allele in SC5314 but differs by several amino acids from that encoded by the second allele. We cannot exclude that the two SC5314 Brg1 proteins have different functionalities that are required for high pathogenicity.
Aiming to explain the acquired high-damage-inducing phenotype of 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*), reminiscent of strain SC5314, we identified a gain-of-function mutation in CYR1, CYR1E1541K, previously described to render Cyr1 hyperactive and thereby to promote constitutive filamentation of strain SC5314, even under non-hyphae-inducing conditions (38). In the background of strain 101, the CYR1E1541K point mutation led to a strong filamentation phenotype in vitro and yet was insufficient to fully de-repress the pathogenicity traits, irrespective of the BRG1 status of the strain, indicating that other, so far unidentified mutations may also contribute to the conversion of a low- into a high-damage-inducing strain. As a matter of fact, 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*) contains, in addition to the Cyr1E1541K point mutation, additional non-synonymous changes in ORFs (Table S1), which may contribute to the phenotype of this isolate. Further investigation of these changes, to identify those that, together with CYR1E1541K, lead to the high-damage-inducing phenotype of 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*), is needed. Pinpointing such change(s) is challenging, as it necessitates extensive characterization of the genomes of strains 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL and 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*), and subsequent evaluation of the validated non-synonymous changes in ORFs using strain engineering. This approach assumes that the phenotypic difference between 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL and 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*) is the consequence of changes in ORFs. Yet, it cannot be excluded that it reflects changes in non-coding regions that are even more challenging to investigate.
We observed a CYR1E1541K-dependent increase in pathogenicity in other low-damage-inducing strains of C. albicans, albeit to variable degrees. While ECE1 expression was consistently increased, other hyphae-associated genes were not. Thus, the consequences of the CYR1E1541K mutation appear to be strain-dependent. This is not unexpected as strain 101 belongs to C. albicans clade 2, while the other low-damage-inducing strains belong to C. albicans clade 1 (such as strain SC5314). Furthermore, these latter two strains differ by numerous non-synonymous SNPs in filamentation-related genes, such as HGC1, UME6, and ROB1, which may influence the penetrance of the CYR1E1541K mutation. Strain-specific regulation of the activity of Cyr1 may include the availability of ATP (the substrate for the generation of cAMP), which is regulated by mitochondrial activity, or differential expression of proteins, such as the Pde2 phosphodiesterase (17).
The impact of CYR1E1541K on fungal properties differs between in vitro and in vivo conditions, suggesting that the degree to which the cAMP-PKA pathway is required for filamentation may also differ under in vivo and in vitro conditions (51). In the mucosal tissue, the threshold to de-repress fungal pathogenicity traits is particularly high and requires an intricate sequence of events that unfold over extended periods of time (40). Cyr1 hyperactivation does not appear strong enough to override the negative regulation of filamentation and hyphae-associated genes by Tup1 and Nrg1 (16). Similarly, the CYR1E1541K mutation did not increase the virulence of strain 101 during systemic candidiasis. C. albicans is able to colonize different types of host tissue, such as the gut, which presents distinct environmental contexts (1, 45). For instance, bacterial peptidoglycan-like molecules, which are abundant in the intestine, were shown to induce filamentation by directly binding to Cyr1 (52). Therefore, we cannot exclude that Cyr1 hyperactivation may affect C. albicans phenotype in the gut.
In addition to the initially identified spontaneous highly damage-inducing mutant 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL (*), we recovered additional spontaneous mutants outgrowing from strain 101, all of which exhibited mutations in the N-terminal part of the RAS1 gene known to freeze the protein in a permanently active state (53, 54). Ras1 acts upstream of Cyr1 to induce filamentation (17). In addition, Ras1 can also induce filamentation independently of Cyr1 by activating Cdc24, leading to activation of the Cph1 transcription factor involved in the filamentation program (55). The observation that all spontaneously developed variants exhibited mutations affecting the cAMP-PKA pathway raises important questions regarding the driving force inducing these mutations. An environmental cue specific to the conditions under which the fungus was cultured may specifically target the cAMP-PKA pathway, or the cAMP-PKA signaling cascade may serve as a preferential target due to its central role in facilitating environmental adaptation without significantly jeopardizing the fungus’s survival.
Together, we demonstrate that strain 101 tightly regulates fungal pathogenicity traits. Additional allele variants may contribute to the inherently low-damage-inducing properties, and replacing a single gene turned out to be insufficient to overcome the strain-intrinsic colonizer program, which supports the maintenance of homeostasis in the colonized mucosal tissue. In addition to the strain-intrinsic properties of a strain, the functional state of a strain also depends on the environmental conditions. When exposed to hyphae-inducing conditions, such as those characteristic of the macrophage phagosome or in the epithelium of the IL-17-deficient host, even low-damage-inducing strains can gradually express increased pathogenicity features (40, 56–58). We observed a similar phenomenon when growing strain 101 on Spider agar, thereby further demonstrating the strong adaptability of C. albicans to its environment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fungal strains
Strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. All strains were maintained on YPD agar for short term and in glycerol-supplemented medium at −80°C for long-term storage. Cultures were inoculated at OD600 = 0.1 in YPD medium (using a pre-culture to adjust the OD600) and grown at 30°C and 180 rpm for 15–18 h. At the end of the culture period, yeast cells were washed in PBS, and their concentration was determined by spectrophotometry, whereby 1 OD600 = 107 yeast cells.
TABLE 1.
C. albicans strains used in this studya
| Strain | Collection # | Genotype | Parental | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC5314 | CA1 | Clinical isolate | n/a | (57) |
| 101 | DSY4709 CA117 |
Clinical isolate | n/a | (25) |
| CEC3672 | CA327 | Clinical isolate | n/a | (39) |
| CEC3678 | CA328 | Clinical isolate | n/a | (39) |
| SC5314_brg1Δ/Δ | DSY5875 CA329 |
arg4∆/arg4∆, leu2∆/leu2∆, his1∆/his1∆, URA3/ura3∆::imm434, IRO1/iro1∆::imm434, brg1∆::HIS1, brg1∆::LEU2 | SN152 | (34) |
| SC5314_BRG1/BRG1 | DSY5876 CA330 |
arg4∆/arg4∆, leu2∆/leu2∆::LEU2, his1∆/his1∆::HIS1, URA3/ ura3∆::imm434, IRO1/iro1∆::imm434 | SN152 | (34) |
| SC5314_brg1∆/BRG1FL | DSY5877 CA331 |
arg4∆/arg4∆, leu2∆/leu2∆, his1∆/his1∆, URA3/ ura3∆::imm434, IRO1/iro1∆::imm43, brg1∆::HIS1::BRG1FL::NAT1, brg1∆::LEU2 (FL allele of strain 101) |
DSY5875 | This study |
| SC5314_brg1∆/BRG1TRUNC | DSY5880 CA334 |
arg4∆/arg4∆, leu2∆/leu2∆, his1∆/his1∆, URA3/ura3∆, IRO1/iro1∆, brg1∆::HIS1::BRG1TRUNC::NAT1, brg1∆::LEU2 (TRUNC allele of strain 101) |
DSY5875 | This study |
| SC5314_BRG1/BRG1TRUNC | DSY5720 CA273 |
BRG1/ BRG1TRUNC ::NAT1 | SC5314 | This study |
| 101_BRG1FL/BRG1TRUNC | DSY5710 CA267 |
BRG1FL/BRG1TRUNC::NAT1 | 101 | This study |
| 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL | DSY5713 CA270 |
BRG1FL/BRG1FL::NAT1 | 101 | This study |
| 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL(*) | DSY5722 CA271 |
BRG1FL/BRG1FL::NAT1, CYR1/CYR1E1541K | DSY5713 | This study |
| 101_CYR1E1541K | DSY5731 CA279 |
CYR1/CYR1E1541K, ENO1::pV1025 | 101 | This study |
| 101_CYR1E1541K/CYR1E1541K (#1) | DSY5730 CA295 |
CYR1E1541K/CYR1E1541K, ENO1::pV1025 | DSY5731 | This study |
| 101_CYR1E1541K/CYR1E1541K (#2) | DSY5732 CA296 |
CYR1E1541K/CYR1E1541K, ENO1::pV1025 | DSY5731 | This study |
| 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL CYR1E1541K (#1) | DSY5862 CA335 |
BRG1FL/BRG1FL::NAT1, CYR1E1541K, ENO1::pDS2168 | DSY5713 | This study |
| 101_BRG1FL/BRG1FL CYR1E1541K (#2) | DSY5863 CA336 |
BRG1FL/BRG1FL::NAT1, CYR1E1541K, ENO1::pDS2168 | DSY5713 | This study |
| CEC3672_CYR1E1541K | DSY5791 CA299 |
CYR1/CYR1E1541K , ENO1::pV1025 | CEC3672 | This study |
| CEC3678_CYR1E1541K | DSY5774 CAC303 |
CYR1/CYR1E1541K, ENO1::pV1025 | CEC3678 | This study |
| DSY4709_1 (*) | DSY5840 | RAS1/RAS1G14R | 101 | This study |
| DSY4709_5 (*) | DSY5842 | RAS1/RAS1G13S | 101 | This study |
| DSY4709_6 (*) | DSY5844 | RAS1/RAS1G14V | 101 | This study |
| DSY5713_1 (*) | DSY5846 | BRG1FL/BRG1FL::NAT1, RAS1/RAS1G14V15insG | DSY5713 | This study |
| DSY5713_2 (*) | DSY5848 | BRG1FL/BRG1FL::NAT1, RAS1/RAS1Q62P | DSY5713 | This study |
n/a, not available.
Identification of the truncated BRG1 allele
PCR of BRG1 alleles on strain 101 was accomplished using primers BRG1-5 and BRG1-3 (Table 2) and analyzed by gel electrophoresis on 1% agarose.
TABLE 2.
Primer list
| Primer | Sequence |
|---|---|
| BRG1-5 | TACATTATAAATATTCACTACTATTCCAGAAAT |
| BRG1-3 | AATACCGCCAGCTAACATATGTTG |
| BRG1-P1 | CTTTCTTAATATCACACAAAAAGTGTTTATTCTTC |
| BRG1-NAT1-5R | GTATTCTGGGCCTCCATGTCGCATTAACAAGTGTTGATTA |
| BRG1-NAT1-5F | TAATCAACACTTGTTAATGCGACATGGAGGCCCAGAATAC |
| BRG1-NAT1-3R | GTATTCTGGGCCTCCATGTCGCATTAACAAGTGTTGATTA |
| BRG1-NAT1-3F | GAATGCTGGTCGCTATACTGAGTGTAATTAGTTTTTTCCT |
| BRG1-P2 | CTCTTAACTTACCACACAAAAAATGCTG |
| BRG1-P3B | CCATTTAATGCATTTAACCCGTTTAACATTT |
| BRG1-P4 | CATTATTTGTCCTGGACGTCGTCT |
| SNR52/N | GCGGCCGCAAGTGATTAGACT |
| sgRNA/N | GCAGCTCAGTGATTAAGAGTAAAGATGG |
| SNR52/F | AAGAAAGAAAGAAAACCAGGAGTGAA |
| Cyr1_guide Rev | CTTCAATTTACGCTCACCAACAAATTAAAAATAGTTTACGCAAGTC |
| sgRNA/R | ACAAATATTTAAACTCGGGACCTGG |
| Cyr1_guide For | TTGGTGAGCGTAAATTGAAGGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAA |
| Cyr1-A | TGACAATTGAACGAGAATTGAATGCATTGGAGGATCTTGGGTGTAACTATTTTAAAATTGGTGAGC GTAAATTGAAGGGATTGA |
| Cyr1-B | AAATATATCATATCTCAATTTCAATCTATTGGTAAACACCAAAGTGATAGGTTCTGGTGTTTTCAATCCCTT CAATTTACGCTC |
| HYGR-NotI | GCTTAAAAGCGGCCGCATTTTATGATGGAATGAATGGGATGAAT |
| HYGR-NheI | GCGCAAAGCTAGCGTATAGTGCTTGCTGTTCGATATTG |
Mutant generation
BRG1TRUNC and BRG1FL revertants in the SC5314 background
BRG1 revertants were constructed with a brg1∆/∆ mutant available from the Homann mutant collection (DSY5875) (34). A PCR fusion strategy was used to amplify BRG1 alleles fused to the NAT1 selection marker. The BRG1 alleles with a 500 bp promoter from strain 101 were first amplified with primers BRG1-P1 and BRG1-NAT1-5R (overlapping primer with NAT1). Next, the NAT1 marker was amplified from pJK795 with BRG1-NAT1-5F and BRG1-NAT1-3R. Finally, the BRG1 downstream sequence (500 bp) was amplified with primers BRG1-P2 and BRG1-NAT1-3F (overlapping primer with NAT1). After PCR fragment purification, equimolar amounts of the three fragments were used with nested primers BRG1-P3B and BRG1-P4 in a fusion PCR to result in a 4 kb fragment. This fragment was used to transform DSY5875 in order to replace the deleted BRG1 alleles with 101 BRG1 alleles. This was achieved by an RNA-protein complexes (RNPs) approach, as reported in Grahl et al. (59), which employs reconstituted, purified Cas9 protein in complex with a scaffold and gene-specific guide RNAs. A gRNA specific for the BRG1 promoter (TGGGTGTAGAGAAACGATGT), upstream of the fusion PCR construct, was designed in silico using Geneious Prime and obtained from IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.) as CRISPR guide RNA (crRNA), containing 20 bp homologous to the target gene fused to the scaffold sequence. RNPs were created using the Alt-R CRISPR-Cas9 system from IDT. Briefly, the BRG1 crRNA and tracrRNA (a universal transactivating CRISPR RNA) were first dissolved in RNase-free distilled water (dH2O) at 100 µM and stored at −80°C. The complete guide RNA was generated by mixing equimolar concentrations (4 µM final) of the gene-specific crRNA and tracrRNA to obtain a final volume of 3.6 µL per transformation. The mix was incubated at 95°C for 5 min and cooled down to room temperature. The Cas9 nuclease 3NLS (60 µM stock from IDT) was diluted to 4 µM in dH2O at a volume of 3 µL per transformation. RNPs were assembled by mixing guide RNAs (3.6 µL of gene-specific crRNA/tracrRNA) with 3 µL of diluted Cas9 protein, followed by incubation at room temperature for 5 min. Transformation of C. albicans was carried out by electroporation using 6.6 µL of gene-specific RNPs, 40 µL of C. albicans cells, and 1–2 µg of the BRG1 fusion PCR (up to 3.4 µL volume). Transformants were selected on YEPD plates with nourseothricin (200 µg/mL) for 3 days at 35°C. After selection of transformants, identification of the specific 101 BRG1 alleles introduced in DSY5875 was verified by targeted sequencing analysis. DSY5877 and DSY5880 contained the BRG1FL and BRG1TRUNC alleles, respectively, in which the HIS1 selective marker in one brg1∆ allele of DSY5875 was replaced by NAT1.
A wild-type BRG1 allele was also replaced by BRG1TRUNC allele in SC5413. For this, the construction of the repair fragment followed the above-mentioned fusion PCR approach. Two guides specific for BRG1 in SC5314, including 5-BRG1-guide-SC (TGGGAAAGAAGAGATTTACA) and 3-BRG1-guide-SC (TTTAAAAAGCATCAATCAAT), were used in the RNP complexes construction. A minor adaptation was that the RNPs were concentrated by 2-fold and mixed each (3.3 µL) with the BRG1 repair fragment for electroporation. Transformants were analyzed by targeted sequence analysis, which yielded DSY5720.
BRG1TRUNC and BRG1FL revertants in the 101 background
To replace specific BRG1 alleles in the 101 background, two different guide fusions were designed, including 5-BRG1-guide-mut-allele (TATTTATAATGTAACAAGTA) and 3-BRG1-guide-mut-allele (CTGCACTGAGATATAAAAAG), which were used in the RNP complexes. The RNPs were concentrated by 2-fold and mixed each (3.3 µL) with the BRG1 repair fragment for electroporation. Transformants were analyzed by targeted sequence analysis, yielding DSY5710 and DSY5713, which contain the BRG1FL/BRG1TRUNC alleles and BRG1FL/BRG1FL alleles, respectively.
Generation of Cyr1E1541K mutants
The introduction of the E1541K mutation in Cyr1 was achieved with a transient guide RNA expression following published protocols (60). First, the guide expression was constructed using two overlapping PCRs obtained with the primer pairs SNR52/F-Cyr1_guide Rev and sgRNA/R-Cyr1_guide, using pV1093 (61) as a template. Fusion PCR between the two fragments was performed with primers SNR52/N and sgRNA/N. Next, the repair fragment (containing the Cyr1E1541K mutation without protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sites) was obtained by mixing primers Cyr1-A and Cyr1-B, followed by self-priming and 20 PCR cycles. The two PCRs were then mixed with pV1025 previously digested by SacI and KpnI to transform strains 101, CEC3672, and CEC3678 (14) by electroporation. Transformants were selected on YEPD plates with nourseothricin (200 µg/mL) for 3 days at 35°C. Targeted sequencing of transformants yielded heterozygous (DSY5731, DSY5791, DSY5774) and homozygous (DSY5730, DSY5732) Cyr1E1541K mutants.
In order to introduce the E1541K mutation in the background of isolate DSY5713, pV1025 was first modified by replacing SAT1 with HYGR (hygromycin resistance). This was achieved by PCR amplification of HYGR from PYM70 (62) using primers HYGR-NotI and HYGR-NheI, followed by insertion into pV1025 at the NotI and NheI restriction sites, yielding pDS2168. This plasmid was digested by KpnI and EcoRV in the transformation procedure described above. After the selection of transformants, targeted sequencing yielded heterozygous Cyr1E1541K mutants DSY5862 and DSY5863.
Genome assembly and annotation of strain 101
High-quality genomic DNA was prepared according to published procedures (63). High molecular weight DNA was sheared with Megaruptor (Diagenode, Denville, NJ, USA) to obtain 10–15 kb fragments. After shearing, the DNA size distribution was checked using a Fragment Analyzer (Advanced Analytical Technologies, Ames, IA, USA). The sheared DNA (1.8 µg) was used to prepare a SMRTbell library with the PacBio SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The resulting library was size-selected on a Blue Pippin system (Sage Science, Inc. Beverly, MA, USA) for molecules larger than 6 kb. It was sequenced with v2.2/v2.0 chemistry and adaptive loading on a PacBio Sequel II instrument (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA) with a 30-hour movie length and 2-hour pre-extension time using one SMRT Cell 8M. Genome assembly was conducted with hifiasm (v0.16.1-r375) (64), and the resulting contigs were benchmarked against the C. albicans SC5314 reference (A22-s07-m01-r145) using MUMmer (v3.0) (65), QUAST (66), and BUSCO (v5.4.2) (67) to assess completeness, contiguity, and gene content. Ab initio gene prediction was performed with AUGUSTUS (v3.4.0) (68), and annotations were refined by mapping to closest orthologs from the OMA Knowledgebase using OMA Fast Mapping (69). Protein-coding gene models underwent manual curation in Geneious Prime (https://www.geneious.com/) to resolve ambiguities and validate exon–intron boundaries. Non-coding RNA loci were identified with Infernal (v1.1.4) (70) against the Rfam database (v14.8) (67). Genome feature files (GFF) and sequence files (FASTA) were manipulated and formatted using EMBOSS (v6.6.0) (71) and integrated into the final annotation with MAKER (v2.31.9) (72). The complete diploid assembly and raw sequencing reads are available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA923600.
Genome-wide mutant analysis
Spontaneous filamenting mutants were subjected to genome sequence analysis. Genomic DNA from isolates DSY5722, DSY5846, and DSY5848 (DSY5713 as parent) and from isolates DSY5840, DSY5842, and DSY5844 (101 as parent) was first obtained by a spheroplasting method (73). Genomic libraries were prepared from 100 ng of DNA using the Illumina DNA Prep Kit (Illumina) and Unique Dual Indexed oligonucleotides (IDT). PCR amplification was performed for five cycles. Libraries were quantified by a fluorimetric method, and their quality was assessed on a Fragment Analyzer (Agilent Technologies). Sequencing was performed as a 2 × 150-cycle paired-end run either on a MiSeq v2 flow cell (DSY5713 and DSY5722) or on a NovaSeq 6000 v1.5 flow cell (Illumina) (DSY5846, DSY5848, DSY5840, DSY5842, and DSY5844). Sequencing data were demultiplexed using the bcl2fastq2 Conversion Software (v. 2.20, Illumina). Data can be obtained under Bioproject PRJNA1147312.
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis was conducted to compare the isolates DSY5713 and spontaneous filamenting mutant DSY5722. As in Ropars et al. (24), each set of paired-end reads was mapped against the C. albicans reference genome SC5314 haplotype A (version A22-s07-m01-r130), downloaded from the Candida Genome Database (http://www.candidagenome.org), and SNPs were called using Genome Analysis Toolkit version 3.6. We created a table encompassing SNPs across the DSY5713 and DSY5722 isolates (Table S1).
SNP analysis from isolates DSY5846, DSY5848, DSY5840, DSY5842, and DSY5844 was performed with CLC Genomics Workbench (v24) using the variant detection tools and the annotated genome from isolate 101. After read mapping to the 101 genome, variants differing from those present in DSY5713 and DSY5722 were filtered using the variant filtering tool in CLC Genomics Workbench (Table S2).
Growth curve assays
C. albicans was inoculated at OD600 = 0.1 in 200 μL YPD or F12 cell culture medium (see below) in a 96-well plate and grown in Synergy H1 plate reader (Bio Tek) for 24 h at 30°C with double orbital shaking (3 mm amplitude) and OD600 measurements every 15 min, each preceded by a 10-second linear shaking pulse (1 mm amplitude).
Colony morphology assays
For assessing filamentation on Spider agar (10 g D-mannitol, Sigma, Cat. no. M4125; 10 g nutrient broth no.1, Sigma, Cat. no. 70122; 2 g K2HPO4, Sigma, Cat. no. 795496; and 13.5 g agar, Sigma, Cat. no. A1296 per 1 L H2O), 3 µL of a yeast cell suspension at 105 cells/mL were spotted, and plates were incubated for specific timing and temperatures as indicated in the figure legends. In some experiments, plates were incubated in the presence of 5% CO2. Filamentation was assessed on YEPD agar (yeast extract peptone dextrose [YEPD], 1% Bacto peptone [Difco Laboratories, Basel, Switzerland], 0.5% yeast extract [Difco], 2% glucose [Sigma], and 2% agar [Difco]) and YCB/BSA agar (1.17% yeast carbon base [Becton Dickinson] and 2% BSA [Sigma]). Overnight cultures in YEPB were diluted in water to obtain single colonies. Plates were incubated at 35°C for 5 to 7 days.
Keratinocyte cell culture
The human oral keratinocyte cell line TR146 (74) was grown in DMEM medium (Sigma, Cat. no. D5796) supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% penicillin, and 1% streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2. For RNA isolation and filamentation assay, cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/well in 24-well tissue culture plates and for cell damage assay at 4 × 104 cells/well in 96-well tissue culture plates, respectively, and grown to confluent monolayers for 2 days prior to infection, as described below for the individual assays. One day prior to the experiment, the DMEM medium was replaced by F12 medium (Hams’s nutrient mixture F12 medium (Gibco, Cat. no. 21765029) supplemented with 1% FCS).
Filamentation assay
Monolayers of TR146 cells in 24-well tissue culture plates, prepared as described above, were infected with 5 × 104 yeast cells per well in a 24-well plate and incubated for 3.5 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were fixed in 2% PFA for 20 min at 4°C. The PFA was then exchanged by PBS for imaging with an EVOS FL Auto microscope (Life Technologies). Filament length was determined with Image J. A total of 20–30 filaments were analyzed per imaged fields, with 10 fields imaged per well and two wells analyzed per strain.
Cell damage assay
Damage induction in TR146 cells by C. albicans was performed as described (75). Briefly, cell monolayers in 96-well tissue culture plates prepared as described above were infected with 2 × 104 yeast cells per well and incubated for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Control wells were incubated with medium only or with 1% Triton-X-100 to determine 100% damage. LDH release into the supernatant was quantified with the LDH cytotoxicity kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA isolation from infected keratinocyte cultures
Monolayers of TR146 cells in 24-well tissue culture plates prepared as described above were infected with 1 ×105 yeast cells per well. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, the medium was removed, cells were frozen on liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until further processing. RNA was isolated with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Briefly, the cells were lysed in RLT lysis buffer and homogenized with 0.5 mm glass beads (Sigma, Cat. no. G1277) using a Tissue Lyzer (Qiagen) seven times for 2 min at 30 Hz, with 30-second cooling periods on ice between cycles. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation. One volume of 75% ethanol was admixed, and each sample was transferred to an RNeasy spin column. The loaded columns were washed using RW1 buffer and RPE buffer. RNA was eluted in 30 μL RNase-free water.
Animals
WT C57BL/6j mice were purchased by Janvier Elevage and kept in specific pathogen-free conditions at the Institute of Laboratory Animals Science (LASC, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland). Female mice were used at 8–14 weeks in age-matched groups. Infected and uninfected animals were kept separately to avoid cross-contamination.
Oral colonization of mice with C. albicans
Mice were infected sublingually with 2.5 × 106 C. albicans yeast cells as described (76), without immunosuppression. In brief, mice were anesthetized by injection of 100 mg/kg ketamine and 20 mg/kg xylazine in sterile saline i.p. administered in three doses. C. albicans was administered by depositing a 2.5 mg cotton ball that was soaked in 100 µL suspension at 5 × 107 yeast cells/mL under the tongue for 80–90 min. Mice were kept on a heating mat at 35–37°C during the entire period of anesthesia, administered with 10 mL/kg sterile saline to stabilize the circulation, and vitamin A ointment was applied to avoid drying out of the eyes.
Systemic infection of mice with C. albicans
Mice were infected by intravenous injection of 2.5 × 105 C. albicans yeast cells for 3 days.
Determination of fungal burden
For determination of the fungal burden, the tongue (or kidney) of euthanized animals was removed and, homogenized in sterile 0.05% NP40 in H2O for 3 min at 25 Hz using a Tissue Lyzer (Qiagen), and serial dilutions were plated on YPD agar containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin.
Histology
Tongue tissue was fixed in 4% PBS-buffered paraformaldehyde overnight and embedded in paraffin. Sagittal sections (9 µm) were stained with periodic-acidic Schiff (PAS) reagent, counterstained with hematoxylin, and mounted with Pertex (Biosystem) according to standard protocols. Images were acquired with a digital slide scanner (NanoZoomer 2.0-HT, Hamamatsu) and analyzed with NDP.view2.
RNA isolation from colonized tongue tissue
Isolation of total RNA (including fungal RNA) from murine tongue was performed using TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Prior to the addition of chloroform, the tongue tissue was homogenized in the presence of a steel ball for 3 min at 25 Hz, followed by homogenization with 0.5 mm glass beads (Sigma) twice for 2 min at 30 Hz, with a 30-second cooling period between cycles. Both homogenizations were performed using a Tissue Lyzer (Qiagen).
RT-qPCR
cDNA was generated using RevertAid reverse transcriptase (ThermoFisher Scientific, Cat. no. EP0452). Quantitative PCR was performed with SYBR Green (Roche, Cat. no. 4913914001) on a QuantStudio 7 Flex instrument (Life Technologies). The primers used in this study are listed in Table 3. All qPCR reactions were performed in duplicates, and the relative expression (rel. expr.) of each gene was determined after normalization to EFB1 or ACT1 housekeeping gene transcript levels.
TABLE 3.
Primers used in this study for detecting C. albicans transcriptsa
| Gene | Forward primer (5′ → 3′) | Reverse primer (5′→ 3′) |
|---|---|---|
| EFB1 | CATTGATGGTACTACTGCCAC | TTTACCGGCTGGCAAGTCTT |
| ACT1 | TGCTGAACGTATGCAAAAGG | TGAACAATGGATGGACCAGA |
| BRG1 | AATCAACCATCACACCCTGC | AATGGCCTGGATGTTGATGC |
| NRG1 | AACCTCAGCCATACCATCAAC | GTAATTAGCCCTGGAGATGGTC |
| ECE1 | CCAAAATTGCCTGTGCTACTG | CTCTTCATGTTGAATTCTGGAGC |
| ALS3 | GGTCTCAATCCTATACCACTGC | GGTTGGTGTAATGAGGACGAG |
| HWP1 | CGGAATCTAGTGCTGTCGTCTCT | CCTTCAAATGTAGAAATAGGAGCAAC |
All primers for C. albicans transcripts were designed to bind to sequences that are conserved between isolates SC5314 and 101.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank the staff of the Laboratory Animal Service Center of University of Zürich for animal husbandry; staff of the Laboratory for Animal Model Pathology of University of Zürich for histology; the Zentrum für klinische Studien of the Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, for access to equipment; Kontxi Martinez de San Vicente for foundational experiments that led to the initiation of this project; and members of the LeibundGut lab for helpful advice and discussions.
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant # CRSII5_173863 to S.L.-L., D.S. and C.D.). Work in the laboratory of C.D. is supported by the Agence Nationale de Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID). S.L.-L. and C.D. received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie action, Innovative Training Network: FunHoMic; grant No. 812969. R.F.-M. was the recipient of a PhD fellowship in the frame of this program.
R.F.-M., D.S., and S.L.-L. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. R.F.-M. and S.M. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. D.S. generated C. albicans mutants. V.D.T.T. did the bioinformatic analyses of strain 101. C.M. and C.D. did additional bioinformatic analyses. S.L.-L., D.S., and C.D. oversaw the study design and data analysis and acquired funding. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Salomé LeibundGut-Landmann, Email: salome.leibundgut-landmann@uzh.ch.
Marcio Rodrigues, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Curitiba, Brazil.
DATA AVAILABILITY
All raw data linked to this study are publicly available on Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19075336). The complete diploid assembly and raw sequencing reads for strain 101 are available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA923600. Sequencing data for strains DSY5846, DSY5848, DSY5840, DSY5842 and DSY5844 are available under under BioProject PRJNA1147312 (under “SRA experiments”).
ETHICS APPROVAL
All mouse experiments in this study were conducted in strict accordance with the guidelines of the Swiss Animals Protection Law and were performed under the protocols approved by the Veterinary office of the Canton Zurich, Switzerland (license number 167/2018 and 141/2021).
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00415-26.
Supplemental figures and captions for supplemental tables.
Genome comparison of strains.
Spontaneous mutations.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. d’Enfert C, Kaune A-K, Alaban L-R, Chakraborty S, Cole N, Delavy M, Kosmala D, Marsaux B, Fróis-Martins R, Morelli M, et al. 2021. The impact of the fungus-host-microbiota interplay upon Candida albicans infections: current knowledge and new perspectives. FEMS Microbiol Rev 45:fuaa060. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lu SY. 2021. Oral candidosis: pathophysiology and best practice for diagnosis, classification, and successful management. J Fungi (Basel) 7:555. doi: 10.3390/jof7070555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Denning DW, Kneale M, Sobel JD, Rautemaa-Richardson R. 2018. Global burden of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 18:e339–e347. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30103-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bacher P, Hohnstein T, Beerbaum E, Röcker M, Blango MG, Kaufmann S, Röhmel J, Eschenhagen P, Grehn C, Seidel K, et al. 2019. Human anti-fungal Th17 immunity and pathology rely on cross-reactivity against Candida albicans. Cell 176:1340–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Shao TY, Ang WXG, Jiang TT, Huang FS, Andersen H, Kinder JM, Pham G, Burg AR, Ruff B, Gonzalez T, Khurana Hershey GK, Haslam DB, Way SS. 2019. Commensal Candida albicans positively calibrates systemic Th17 immunological responses. Cell Host Microbe 25:404–417. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Carlson SL, Mathew L, Savage M, Kok K, Lindsay JO, Munro CA, McCarthy NE. 2023. Mucosal immunity to gut fungi in health and inflammatory bowel disease. J Fungi (Basel) 9:1105. doi: 10.3390/jof9111105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li XV, Leonardi I, Putzel GG, Semon A, Fiers WD, Kusakabe T, Lin W-Y, Gao IH, Doron I, Gutierrez-Guerrero A, DeCelie MB, Carriche GM, Mesko M, Yang C, Naglik JR, Hube B, Scherl EJ, Iliev ID. 2022. Immune regulation by fungal strain diversity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 603:672–678. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04502-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zeng S, Rosati E, Saggau C, Messner B, Chu H, Duan Y, Hartmann P, Wang Y, Ma S, Huang WJM, Lee J, Lee SM, Carvalho-Gontijo R, Zhang V, Hoffmann JP, Kolls JK, Raz E, Brenner DA, Kisseleva T, LeibundGut-Landmann S, Bacher P, Stärkel P, Schnabl B. 2023. Candida albicans-specific Th17 cell-mediated response contributes to alcohol-associated liver disease. Cell Host Microbe 31:389–404. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wall G, Lopez-Ribot JL. 2020. Current antimycotics, new prospects, and future approaches to antifungal therapy. Antibiotics (Basel) 9:445. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9080445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liang S-H, Sircaik S, Dainis J, Kakade P, Penumutchu S, McDonough LD, Chen Y-H, Frazer C, Schille TB, Allert S, Elshafee O, Hänel M, Mogavero S, Vaishnava S, Cadwell K, Belenky P, Perez JC, Hube B, Ene IV, Bennett RJ. 2024. The hyphal-specific toxin candidalysin promotes fungal gut commensalism. Nature 627:620–627. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07142-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cleary IA, Lazzell AL, Monteagudo C, Thomas DP, Saville SP. 2012. BRG1 and NRG1 form a novel feedback circuit regulating Candida albicans hypha formation and virulence. Mol Microbiol 85:557–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08127.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Saville SP, Lazzell AL, Monteagudo C, Lopez-Ribot JL. 2003. Engineered control of cell morphology in vivo reveals distinct roles for yeast and filamentous forms of Candida albicans during infection. Eukaryot Cell 2:1053–1060. doi: 10.1128/EC.2.5.1053-1060.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Fróis-Martins R, Lagler J, Schille TB, Elshafee O, Martinez de San Vicente K, Mertens S, Stokmaier M, Kilb I, Sertour N, Bachellier-Bassi S, Mogavero S, Sanglard D, d’Enfert C, Hube B, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2025. Dynamic expression of candidalysin facilitates oral colonization of Candida albicans in mice. Nat Microbiol 10:2472–2485. doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-02122-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lemberg C, Martinez de San Vicente K, Fróis-Martins R, Altmeier S, Tran VDT, Mertens S, Amorim-Vaz S, Rai LS, d’Enfert C, Pagni M, Sanglard D, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2022. Candida albicans commensalism in the oral mucosa is favoured by limited virulence and metabolic adaptation. PLoS Pathog 18:e1010012. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Noble SM, Gianetti BA, Witchley JN. 2017. Candida albicans cell-type switching and functional plasticity in the mammalian host. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:96–108. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Chow EWL, Pang LM, Wang Y. 2021. From jekyll to hyde: the yeast-hyphal transition of Candida albicans. Pathogens 10:859. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Grahl N, Demers EG, Lindsay AK, Harty CE, Willger SD, Piispanen AE, Hogan DA. 2015. Mitochondrial activity and Cyr1 are key regulators of Ras1 activation of C. albicans virulence pathways. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005133. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hogan DA, Muhlschlegel FA. 2011. Candida albicans developmental regulation: adenylyl cyclase as a coincidence detector of parallel signals. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:682–686. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mogavero S, Sauer FM, Brunke S, Allert S, Schulz D, Wisgott S, Jablonowski N, Elshafee O, Krüger T, Kniemeyer O, Brakhage AA, Naglik JR, Dolk E, Hube B. 2021. Candidalysin delivery to the invasion pocket is critical for host epithelial damage induced by Candida albicans. Cell Microbiol 23:e13378. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Moyes DL, Wilson D, Richardson JP, Mogavero S, Tang SX, Wernecke J, Höfs S, Gratacap RL, Robbins J, Runglall M, et al. 2016. Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection. Nature 532:64–68. doi: 10.1038/nature17625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Staab JF, Bradway SD, Fidel PL, Sundstrom P. 1999. Adhesive and mammalian transglutaminase substrate properties of Candida albicans Hwp1. Science 283:1535–1538. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5407.1535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Murad AMA. 2001. NRG1 represses yeast-hypha morphogenesis and hypha-specific gene expression in Candida albicans. EMBO J 20:4742–4752. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Braun BR, Kadosh D, Johnson AD. 2001. NRG1, a repressor of filamentous growth in C.albicans, is down-regulated during filament induction. EMBO J 20:4753–4761. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ropars J, Maufrais C, Diogo D, Marcet-Houben M, Perin A, Sertour N, Mosca K, Permal E, Laval G, Bouchier C, et al. 2018. Gene flow contributes to diversification of the major fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Nat Commun 9:2253. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04787-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Schönherr FA, Sparber F, Kirchner FR, Guiducci E, Trautwein-Weidner K, Gladiator A, Sertour N, Hetzel U, Le GTT, Pavelka N, d’Enfert C, Bougnoux M-E, Corti CF, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2017. The intraspecies diversity of C. albicans triggers qualitatively and temporally distinct host responses that determine the balance between commensalism and pathogenicity. Mucosal Immunol 10:1335–1350. doi: 10.1038/mi.2017.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Anderson FM, Visser ND, Amses KR, Hodgins-Davis A, Weber AM, Metzner KM, McFadden MJ, Mills RE, O’Meara MJ, James TY, O’Meara TR. 2023. Candida albicans selection for human commensalism results in substantial within-host diversity without decreasing fitness for invasive disease. PLoS Biol 21:e3001822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Conti HR, Shen F, Nayyar N, Stocum E, Sun JN, Lindemann MJ, Ho AW, Hai JH, Yu JJ, Jung JW, Filler SG, Masso-Welch P, Edgerton M, Gaffen SL. 2009. Th17 cells and IL-17 receptor signaling are essential for mucosal host defense against oral candidiasis. J Exp Med 206:299–311. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. McDonough LD, Mishra AA, Tosini N, Kakade P, Penumutchu S, Liang S-H, Maufrais C, Zhai B, Taur Y, Belenky P, Bennett RJ, Hohl TM, Koh AY, Ene IV. 2021. Candida albicans isolates 529L and CHN1 exhibit stable colonization of the murine gastrointestinal tract. mBio 12:e02878-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02878-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Millet N, Sekar J, Solis NV, Millet A, Aggor FEY, Wildeman A, Lionakis MS, Gaffen SL, Jendzjowsky N, Filler SG, Swidergall M. 2024. Non-canonical IL-22 receptor signaling remodels the mucosal barrier during fungal immunosurveillance. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.08.611873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30. Braunsdorf C, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2018. Modulation of the fungal-host interaction by the intra-species diversity of C. albicans. Pathogens 7:11. doi: 10.3390/pathogens7010011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kirchner F.R, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2021. Tissue-resident memory Th17 cells maintain stable fungal commensalism in the oral mucosa. Mucosal Immunol 14:455–467. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-0327-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kirchner Florian R, Littringer K, Altmeier S, Tran VDT, Schönherr F, Lemberg C, Pagni M, Sanglard D, Joller N, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2019. Persistence of Candida albicans in the oral mucosa induces a curbed inflammatory host response that is independent of immunosuppression. Front Immunol 10:330. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Rodriguez DL, Quail MM, Hernday AD, Nobile CJ. 2020. Transcriptional circuits regulating developmental processes in Candida albicans. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:605711. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.605711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Homann OR, Dea J, Noble SM, Johnson AD. 2009. A phenotypic profile of the Candida albicans regulatory network. PLoS Genet 5:e1000783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Martin R, Albrecht-Eckardt D, Brunke S, Hube B, Hünniger K, Kurzai O. 2013. A core filamentation response network in Candida albicans is restricted to eight genes. PLoS One 8:e58613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Gladiator A, Wangler N, Trautwein-Weidner K, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2013. Cutting edge: IL-17-secreting innate lymphoid cells are essential for host defense against fungal infection. J Immunol 190:521–525. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Trautwein-Weidner K, Gladiator A, Nur S, Diethelm P, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2015. IL-17-mediated antifungal defense in the oral mucosa is independent of neutrophils. Mucosal Immunol 8:221–231. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bai C, Xu XL, Wang HS, Wang YM, Chan FY, Wang Y. 2011. Characterization of a hyperactive Cyr1 mutant reveals new regulatory mechanisms for cellular cAMP levels in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol 82:879–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07859.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bougnoux ME, Kac G, Aegerter P, d’Enfert C, Fagon JY, CandiRea Study G. 2008. Candidemia and candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units in France: incidence, molecular diversity, management and outcome. Intensive Care Med 34:292–299. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0865-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Fróis-Martins R, Martinez de San Vicente K, Maufrais C, Mertens S, Sertour N, Sitterlé E, Bougnoux M-E, d’Enfert C, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2026. IL-17-mediated antifungal immunity restricts Candida albicans pathogenicity in the oral cavity. Nat Microbiol 11:111–124. doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-02198-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Fang HM, Wang Y. 2006. RA domain-mediated interaction of Cdc35 with Ras1 is essential for increasing cellular cAMP level for Candida albicans hyphal development. Mol Microbiol 61:484–496. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05248.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Won DD, Lee JI, Lee IK, Oh ST, Jung ES, Lee SH. 2017. The prognostic significance of KRAS and BRAF mutation status in Korean colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer 17:403. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3381-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Palmirotta R, Ludovici G, De Marchis ML, Leone B, Formica V, Ettorre GM, Cavaliere F, Della-Morte D, Ferroni P, Roselli M, Guadagni F. 2012. A comprehensive procedural approach to genotyping KRAS and BRAF from paraffin embedded tissues for diagnostic purposes. In Vivo 26:537–547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Feng Q, Summers E, Guo B, Fink G. 1999. Ras signaling is required for serum-induced hyphal differentiation in Candida albicans. J Bacteriol 181:6339–6346. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.20.6339-6346.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Fróis-Martins R, Lagler J, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2024. Candida albicans virulence traits in commensalism and disease. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep 11:231–240. doi: 10.1007/s40588-024-00235-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lu Y, Su C, Liu H. 2012. A GATA transcription factor recruits Hda1 in response to reduced Tor1 signaling to establish a hyphal chromatin state in Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002663. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Glazier VE, Kramara J, Ollinger T, Solis NV, Zarnowski R, Wakade RS, Kim MJ, Weigel GJ, Liang SH, Bennett RJ, Wellington M, Andes DR, Stamnes MA, Filler SG, Krysan DJ. 2023. The Candida albicans reference strain SC5314 contains a rare, dominant allele of the transcription factor Rob1 that modulates filamentation, biofilm formation, and oral commensalism. mBio 14:e01521-23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01521-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Gnaien M, Maufrais C, Rebai Y, Kallel A, Ma L, Hamouda S, Khalsi F, Meftah K, Smaoui H, Khemiri M, Hadj Fredj S, Bachellier-Bassi S, Najjar I, Messaoud T, Boussetta K, Kallel K, Mardassi H, d’Enfert C, Bougnoux M-E, Znaidi S. 2024. A gain-of-function mutation in zinc cluster transcription factor Rob1 drives Candida albicans adaptive growth in the cystic fibrosis lung environment. PLoS Pathog 20:e1012154. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wakade RS, Ristow LC, Wellington M, Krysan DJ. 2023. Intravital imaging-based genetic screen reveals the transcriptional network governing Candida albicans filamentation during mammalian infection. eLife 12:e85114. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Su C, Lu Y, Liu H. 2013. Reduced TOR signaling sustains hyphal development in Candida albicans by lowering Hog1 basal activity. Mol Biol Cell 24:385–397. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-06-0477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Wakade RS, Kramara J, Wellington M, Krysan DJ. 2022. Candida albicans filamentation does not require the cAMP-PKA pathway in vivo. mBio 13:e0085122. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00851-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Xu X-L, Lee RTH, Fang H-M, Wang Y-M, Li R, Zou H, Zhu Y, Wang Y. 2008. Bacterial peptidoglycan triggers Candida albicans hyphal growth by directly activating the adenylyl cyclase Cyr1p. Cell Host Microbe 4:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Polke M, Sprenger M, Scherlach K, Albán-Proaño MC, Martin R, Hertweck C, Hube B, Jacobsen ID. 2017. A functional link between hyphal maintenance and quorum sensing in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol 103:595–617. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Salafsky J, Ryan P. 2013. Methods for identifying modulators of RAS using nonlinear techniquesWO 2013/115867 A1
- 55. Román E, Arana DM, Nombela C, Alonso-Monge R, Pla J. 2007. MAP kinase pathways as regulators of fungal virulence. Trends Microbiol 15:181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Case NT, Westman J, Hallett MT, Plumb J, Farheen A, Maxson ME, MacAlpine J, Liston SD, Hube B, Robbins N, Whitesell L, Grinstein S, Cowen LE. 2023. Respiration supports intraphagosomal filamentation and escape of Candida albicans from macrophages. mBio 14:e02745-23. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02745-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Gillum AM, Tsay EY, Kirsch DR. 1984. Isolation of the Candida albicans gene for orotidine-5’-phosphate decarboxylase by complementation of S. cerevisiae ura3 and E. coli pyrF mutations. Mol Gen Genet 198:179–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00328721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Wartenberg A, Linde J, Martin R, Schreiner M, Horn F, Jacobsen ID, Jenull S, Wolf T, Kuchler K, Guthke R, Kurzai O, Forche A, d’Enfert C, Brunke S, Hube B. 2014. Microevolution of Candida albicans in macrophages restores filamentation in a nonfilamentous mutant. PLoS Genet 10:e1004824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Grahl N, Demers EG, Crocker AW, Hogan DA. 2017. Use of RNA-protein complexes for genome editing in non-albicans Candida species. mSphere 2:e00218-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00218-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Min K, Ichikawa Y, Woolford CA, Mitchell AP. 2016. Candida albicans gene deletion with a transient CRISPR-Cas9 system. mSphere 1:e00130-16 doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00130-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Vyas VK, Barrasa MI, Fink GR. 2015. A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Sci Adv 1:e1500248. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Basso LR Jr, Bartiss A, Mao Y, Gast CE, Coelho PSR, Snyder M, Wong B. 2010. Transformation of Candida albicans with a synthetic hygromycin B resistance gene. Yeast 27:1039–1048. doi: 10.1002/yea.1813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Vale-Silva L, Beaudoing E, Tran VDT, Sanglard D. 2017. Comparative genomics of two sequential Candida glabrata clinical isolates. G3 (Bethesda) 7:2413–2426. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.042887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Cheng H, Concepcion GT, Feng X, Zhang H, Li H. 2021. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods 18:170–175. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5:R12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Kalvari I, Nawrocki EP, Ontiveros-Palacios N, Argasinska J, Lamkiewicz K, Marz M, Griffiths-Jones S, Toffano-Nioche C, Gautheret D, Weinberg Z, Rivas E, Eddy SR, Finn RD, Bateman A, Petrov AI. 2021. Rfam 14: expanded coverage of metagenomic, viral and microRNA families. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D192–D200. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, Hayes A, Waack S, Morgenstern B. 2006. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W435–W439. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Altenhoff AM, Warwick Vesztrocy A, Bernard C, Train C-M, Nicheperovich A, Prieto Baños S, Julca I, Moi D, Nevers Y, Majidian S, Dessimoz C, Glover NM. 2024. OMA orthology in 2024: improved prokaryote coverage, ancestral and extant GO enrichment, a revamped synteny viewer and more in the OMA ecosystem. Nucleic Acids Res 52:D513–D521. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR. 2013. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29:2933–2935. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. 2000. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 16:276–277. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Holt C, Yandell M. 2011. MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinform 12:491. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Calabrese D, Bille J, Sanglard D. 2000. A novel multidrug efflux transporter gene of the major facilitator superfamily from Candida albicans (FLU1) conferring resistance to fluconazole. Microbiology (Reading) 146 (Pt 11):2743–2754. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-11-2743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Rupniak HT, Rowlatt C, Lane EB, Steele JG, Trejdosiewicz LK, Laskiewicz B, Povey S, Hill BT. 1985. Characteristics of four new human cell lines derived from squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. J Natl Cancer Inst 75:621–635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Jacobsen ID, Wilson D, Wächtler B, Brunke S, Naglik JR, Hube B. 2012. Candida albicans dimorphism as a therapeutic target. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 10:85–93. doi: 10.1586/eri.11.152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Solis NV, Filler SG. 2012. Mouse model of oropharyngeal candidiasis. Nat Protoc 7:637–642. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental figures and captions for supplemental tables.
Genome comparison of strains.
Spontaneous mutations.
Data Availability Statement
All raw data linked to this study are publicly available on Zenodo (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19075336). The complete diploid assembly and raw sequencing reads for strain 101 are available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA923600. Sequencing data for strains DSY5846, DSY5848, DSY5840, DSY5842 and DSY5844 are available under under BioProject PRJNA1147312 (under “SRA experiments”).






