Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2026 May 13;12(20):eaea6509. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aea6509

Fate of isoprene peroxy radical constrains the urban photochemical regime

Michael A Robinson 1,2,*, Matthew M Coggon 2, Kelvin H Bates 1,2,, Jeff Peischl 1,2,, Christopher M Jernigan 1,2,§, Gordon Novak 2, Subi Thakali 3, James M Roberts 2,, J Andrew Neuman 1,2,, Patrick R Veres 2,#, Kristen Zuraski 1,2, Eleanor M Waxman 1,2, Wyndom S Chace 1,2,4, Andrew W Rollins 2, Victoria Treadaway 1,2,**, Morgan Selby 1,2,††, Colby Francoeur 1,2,5, Jessica B Gilman 2, Shang Liu 6, Erin R Delaria 7,8, Abby E Sebol 9, Nidhi S Desai 10, Jennifer Kaiser 10,11, Kathryn E Kautzman 12, Jason M St Clair 7,13, Glenn M Wolfe 7, Lu Xu 1,2,‡‡, Chelsea E Stockwell 2, Carsten Warneke 2, Han N Huynh 1,2, Ming Lyu 1,2, Adam Ahern 1,2, Charles A Brock 2, Alison Piasecki 1,2,§§, Sarah Albertin 1,2, Ann M Middlebrook 2, Amy P Sullivan 14, Magesh Kumaran Mohan 10, Rodney Weber 10, Emily Lill 14, Ilana Pollack 14,¶¶, Katherine Ball 15, John D Crounse 15,16, Paul O Wennberg 15,16,17, Anna Novelli 18, Aaron Stainsby 18, Hendrik Fuchs 18,19, Birger Bohn 18, Georgios I Gkatzelis 18, Joshua P DiGangi 20, Glenn S Diskin 20, J Jerrold M Acdan 21,#, R Bradley Pierce 21,22, Chia-Hua Hsu 1,2, Siyuan Wang 1,2, Rebecca Schwantes 2, Gonzalo González Abad 23, Caroline R Nowlan 23, Xiong Liu 23, Nathan Howard 1,2,##, Steven S Brown 2,4
PMCID: PMC13170639  PMID: 42127190

Abstract

Declining nitrogen oxide (NOx = NO + NO2) emissions have transformed oxidation pathways in urban atmospheres, with implications for air quality. Organic peroxy radicals (RO2), key intermediates in volatile organic compound oxidation, typically react with NO to form ozone (O3). Under lower-NO conditions, alternative RO2 fates, including isomerization forming highly oxidized organic molecules (HOMs), can enhance secondary organic aerosol (SOA) production. We combine aircraft observations over four major North American cities with geostationary satellite data to characterize isoprene-derived RO2 fate across urban environments. We infer RO2 bimolecular lifetimes (τbi) as a proxy for isomerization potential, finding longer τbi (17 ± 11 seconds) in New York, Chicago, and Toronto compared to Los Angeles (7 ± 6 seconds). Satellite measurements reveal that long τbi is widespread across urban North America, suggesting that declining NOx is likely to lead to greater HOM formation in urban regions. These findings indicate that atmospheric models omitting RO2 isomerization chemistry may incorrectly simulate organic oxidation and the subsequent oxidation state of volatile organic compounds and SOA.


Less NOx shifts peroxy radical chemistry, reducing ozone but enhancing highly oxidized molecules.

INTRODUCTION

The atmospheric chemical reactions between NOx = (NO + NO2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and HOx = (OH + HO2) produce secondary pollutants such as tropospheric ozone (O3) and secondary aerosol that degrade air quality and affect human health (1, 2). The relative abundance of NOx and VOCs determines O3 and secondary aerosol production regimes, often described as either NOx-sensitive or NOx-saturated (38). These regimes depend on the fate of hydroxyl (OH), hydroperoxyl (HO2), and organic peroxy (RO2) radicals. Organic peroxy radicals formed by photochemical VOC oxidation react either with NO to form organic nitrates (RONO2) and alkoxy radicals (RO), with NO2 to form acyl peroxynitrates [PANs; RC(O)OONO2], with HO2 to form hydroperoxides (ROOH), or with other RO2 to form an assortment of oxygenates. In addition, certain RO2 radicals may undergo isomerization to form highly oxidized organic molecules (HOMs) (912). The rates at which RO2 radicals react along these pathways, sometimes termed the photochemical regime, change the composition of atmospheric organic matter and affect the rate at which ozone, secondary organic aerosol (SOA), and other secondary pollutants form.

Defining photochemical regimes is challenging because of the nonlinear dependence of O3 and SOA production on NOx and VOCs. This understanding is essential for the development of air pollution mitigation strategies. Traditional approaches include model-based isopleth analyses (6, 1319), radical termination metrics (17, 1924), and proxies such as formaldehyde (HCHO)–to–NO2 ratio (FNR) or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)–to–HNO3 ratio (2527). FNR is useful for the HOx/NOx ratio because it is observable by satellite remote sensing instruments (24, 2730). While FNR does often correlate well with other photochemical regime indicators (24), it is imperfect because it is a quantity that integrates over time rather than representing the instantaneous RO2 fate, a key factor in the photochemical regime, particularly in transitional or low-NO regimes. Furthermore, the spatial and temporal variation in satellite-retrieved FNR does not represent the true extent of this heterogeneity in the chemistry or emissions (31).

Recent research underscores the importance of RO2 fate (i.e., low-NO or high-NO) in defining photochemical regimes. For example, organic molecules in wildfire plumes show a rapid shift from high-NO to low-NO oxidation as NOx is transformed to reactive nitrogen reservoirs (32). SOA modeling studies, such as those defining the fraction of RO2 reacting with either NO or HO2 (sometimes termed β), have shown that high-NO chemistry dominated the continental US in the early 2000s (33), while transitional chemistry (where RO2 + NO and RO2 + HO2 reactions compete) better represents the global atmosphere (34). Combined observations and models reveal widely varying RO2 fates in urban plumes (35) and the upper troposphere (36, 37), highlighting the need for detailed observations.

As NOx emissions decline and RO2 fate shifts to predominately low-NO bimolecular fates, the prevalence of RO2 isomerization pathways will increase. RO2 isomerization is the overall process of an RO2 undergoing an intramolecular hydrogen shift to form an alkyl radical with a hydroperoxide functional group (9, 10, 38). This alkyl radical will rapidly form a more oxidized RO2, which can continue to undergo rapid H-shifts, or terminate to form diverse products including HOMs (38, 39). Multiple generations of H-shifts to form HOMs are often termed autoxidation. Because of their low volatility, anthropogenic and biogenic HOMs can contribute substantially to SOA formation (38, 40, 41).

Isoprene, the largest biogenic VOC emission in the atmosphere, strongly influences the oxidative capacity of the terrestrial troposphere (42), alters NOx fate (43), and affects SOA (4446). Isoprene reacts rapidly with OH and plays a key role in urban O3 exceedances in North America (47, 48). In New York City (NYC), isoprene and other biogenic VOCs contribute up to 85% of O3 production from VOCs (49), while in Los Angeles, isoprene accounts for nearly half of O3 formation potential from VOCs in both 2014 and 2021 (5052). Chicago, although less studied, also exhibits a large contribution of isoprene to OH reactivity (~30%) (53). Isoprene is ubiquitous in the air of most US cities, but its contribution to RO2 chemistry and O3 production is relevant anywhere isoprene chemistry is prevalent. Changes in anthropogenic VOC emissions, NOx emissions, climate, and urban greening could alter isoprene’s role in urban O3 production (50, 54, 55).

Here, we leverage measurements of isoprene oxidation products and demonstrate a measurement-based approach to define the photochemical regime (Fig. 1). Specifically, we analyze measurements of isoprene hydroxy nitrates (IHNs; C5H9NO4) that are produced from RO2 + NO pathways and isoprene hydroperoxides and epoxy diols (ISOPOOH and IEPOX, respectively; C5H10O3) that are produced from RO2 + HO2 pathways. We show that the relative contribution of these products informs RO2 fate, photochemical regimes, and bimolecular lifetime for urban VOCs. We connect this measure to a satellite-derived proxy of photochemical regimes and show that RO2 isomerization, an important yet understudied determinant of atmospheric organic composition, is likely prevalent across most North American urban areas.

Fig. 1. Reactions of (β-1,2) isoprene peroxy radical with NO, HO2, and RO2.

Fig. 1.

Only the (β-1,2) isomer shown for clarity. Circled species were measured directly during SUNVEx and AEROMMA via CIMS (∑IHN and ∑ISOPOOH + IEPOX), LIF or cavity ring down spectroscopy (NO, NO2, and HCHO), and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (isoprene and MVK). Rates and branching ratios are from the study by Wennberg et al. (57). Background photos taken by P.R.V. and M.A.R.

In the following sections, we first explore the use of isoprene RO2 as a proxy for understanding urban VOC RO2 fate. We then validate measurement-based isoprene RO2 fate against modeled metrics and define the chemical regimes governing O3 production. The discussion expands to examine the variation of chemical regimes across major North American cities sampled with aircraft during the summer of 2023. We study the role of RO2 isomerization in urban chemistry and lastly how chemical regimes observed with Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) satellite, as indicated by measured column FNR, show the extent of RO2 isomerization in North American urban areas.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We evaluate relationships between isoprene RO2 fate, FNR, radical termination, and photochemical regime in urban air using data from two field campaigns. One was sampled at a ground site in Pasadena, CA (1 August to 5 September 2021; see section S1.1), downwind of the Los Angeles urban core. The other, part of the Atmospheric Emissions and Reactions from Megacities to Marine Areas (AEROMMA) mission, used a research aircraft to sample four major North America cities (26 July to 26 August 2023). Measurement and sampling details are provided in Materials and Methods and section S1.5.

Estimating fNO with isoprene RO2 and defining O3 production chemical regimes

Equation 1 defines the fraction of RO2 radicals reacting with NO, fNO

fNO=kRO2+NO[NO]kRO2+NO[NO]+kRO2+HO2[HO2]+kRO2+RO2[RO2]+kisom (1)

where kRO2+NO, kRO2+HO2, kRO2+RO2, and kisom are the rate coefficients of RO2 reacting with NO, HO2, or RO2, or isomerization, respectively. A similar parameter used previously (56), β, is defined when only considering the NO and HO2 bimolecular RO2 fates (see section S3.3) and represents fNO when these reactants control RO2 reactive fate. We use known isoprene oxidation products of RO2 + NO (∑IHN) and RO2 + HO2 (∑[ISOPOOH+IEPOX]) pathways to develop a measurement-based proxy of fNO, termed fNO, defined in Eq. 2

fNO=[IHN]αIHN[IHN]αIHN+([ISOPOOH+IEPOX]αISOPOOHαIEPOX) (2)

where αIHN and αISOPOOH are the product branching ratios (see Fig. 1; αIHN = 0.13, αISOPOOH = 0.937, and αIEPOX = 0.95) (57), and [IHN] and ∑[ISOPOOH+IEPOX] are measured mixing ratios using chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS). Similar approaches have been used to understand the fate of RO2 in smoke using the known chemistry of VOCs emitted from biomass burning (32). In this analysis, isoprene is an ideal choice because (i) it is abundant and ubiquitous in urban, rural, and remote terrestrial regions and (ii) its product distributions are well studied. A full description of these CIMS measurements and the derivation of fNO is provided in Materials and Methods and sections S1.2 and S3.2. The uncertainty in fNO depends on its magnitude (see Materials and Methods and figs. S1 to S3). It is smallest when fNO is high (≈0.98, ±0.030.01), moderate at intermediate values (≈0.88, ±0.120.07), and largest at low values (≈0.63, ±0.220.19). Measurement-derived fNO relies on the assumption that production of isoprene oxidation products is large and that their measured relative concentration is not appreciably affected by differences in the rate of their chemical losses. We test these assumptions with individual AEROMMA flight box models over relevant chemical timescales (see sections S1.6, S2.2, and S2.3 and figs. S4). We apply models and ground site observations to define the fNO transition point for NOx-saturated to NOx-sensitive O3 production. In Fig. 2, we compare the model relationships between fNO and fNO, as well as other proxies of atmospheric chemical regimes including FNR, radical termination (Ln/Q), and chemical O3 production.

Fig. 2. Modeled chemical regime transitions in isoprene RO2 chemistry.

Fig. 2.

The model relationships of fNO, fNO, Ln/Q, FNRin situ, and normalized photochemical O3 production with initial NOx at constant OH exposure (2.3 × 1010 molecules cm−3 s) for isoprene chemistry. Blue shading represents NOx-sensitive chemistry, and red shading represents NOx-saturated chemistry. FNRin situ and Ln/Q transitions are presented from the literature (20, 24, 31, 59), and fNO and fNO transition is defined by dfNO/dNOx < 0.1 ppbv−1.

First, we evaluate fNO for five urban VOCs using a box model constrained in Pasadena, CA, during the summer of 2021 to determine whether fNO derived from isoprene is representative of reactive fates of other VOCs observed in urban air (see section S2.1 for box model details). While VOC OH reactivity (VOCR; ∑kOH[VOC]) is driven by isoprene (45% of VOCR at noon) at the Pasadena ground site (fig. S5), we find that isoprene’s RO2 fate closely resembles those of other urban VOCs, including toluene, isopentane, and other biogenic VOCs, such as α-pinene (see section S3.4 and fig. S6). This is due to similarity in RO2 + NO and RO2 + HO2 rates across VOCs (58). We conclude that when isomerization and RO2 + RO2 reactions are negligible, isoprene fNO sufficiently represents urban VOC fNO (fig. S6). However, for VOC-derived RO2 that isomerize rapidly, traditional bimolecular RO2 fate does not adequately describe their fate, an aspect we explore further below.

Figure 2 displays the nonlinear relationship isoprene fNO has with NOx. Also shown is modeled fNO, which agrees with fNO within 15% and demonstrates the utility of this measurement-based proxy for RO2 fate (see figs. S7 and S8 and sections S2.1 to S2.3 for further comparisons and model descriptions). Notably, fNO exhibits a monotonically increasing relationship with NOx until ~3.5 parts per billion by volume (ppbv). At this point (fNO and fNO ~ 0.9), the proxy saturates and exhibits smaller sensitivity with respect to NOx. This transition occurs at the same NOx levels as the “chemical regime” transition typically associated with traditional O3 regime metrics, namely FNR and Ln/Q. The radical termination approach, Ln/Q, is calculated to estimate the O3 production chemical regime in both the Pasadena ground site and simplified isoprene box models (section S3.1) (1923). Briefly, Ln is the rate of odd hydrogen (= OH + HO2 + RO2) removal by reactions with NOx, and Q is the sum of total odd hydrogen loss (see section S3.1 for more information). Values of Ln/Q > 0.5 indicate NOx-saturated chemistry, where most of radical termination reactions proceed via reaction with NOx (20). Conversely, Ln/Q < 0.5 indicates NOx-sensitive chemistry, where most of the radical termination reactions proceed via radical-radical reactions. However, in urban atmospheres when compared to ozone isopleths, the Ln/Q transition value is typically higher (~0.7) (31, 59). The transition in fNO when dfNOdNOx falls below 0.1 ppbv−1, corresponding to fNO of 0.90, agreeing with in situ FNR (FNRin situ) and Ln/Q, defined transitions in the literature (Ln/Q = 0.5; FNRin situ of 1.8) and other studies on fNO (20, 24, 36, 37). The transition in fNO could be as high as 0.95 if Ln/Q transition is 0.7, as shown in Fig. 2. Furthermore, we find that the average relative uncertainty for FNRin situ is ±33% for the AEROMMA campaign (see Methods and Materials and figs. S1 to S3), emphasizing the uncertainty in the FNRin situ transition definition (1.8 ± 0.6). Comparison of modeled fNO to fNO in Pasadena shows agreement within 5 to 15% throughout the photochemical day (fig. S7). This comparison with real atmospheric data indicates a high bias in the model-derived transition of fNO, leading to defining the fNO chemical saturation at 0.9 with respect to O3 production regime. This saturation point does not reflect where the RO2 chemistry has equal NO and HO2 rates, which is at 0.5, but the point where RO2 fate and O3 production are no longer sensitive to NO.

Chemical regimes across North American cities

Figure 3A shows transect-averaged fNO and FNRin situ during AEROMMA for the four North American cities. Isoprene makes up 6 to 16% of VOCR in these cities, allowing for fNO determination (see fig. S9). The relationship between FNRin situ and fNO illustrates how the established O3-production regime proxy (FNR) compares to the metric of RO2 fate. The O3-production regime transition for FNRin situ is taken from Souri et al. (24) (1.8 ± 0.4), which agrees with the fNO saturation of 0.9 established above. However, column-derived FNR (FNRremote) transition values differ from FNRin situ. In the work of Duncan et al. (27), NOx-saturated chemistry occurs with FNRremote < 1, and NOx-sensitive chemistry occurs with FNRremote > 2, with transitional chemistry for FNRremote between 1 and 2 (60, 61). The simplified zero-dimensional box model–predicted results from Fig. 2 are also shown in Fig. 3A. The solid black curve and markers are model estimates at a constant OH exposure (AEROMMA average = 2.3 × 1010 molecules cm−3 s) created by varying initial NO from 100 to 3600 parts per trillion by volume (pptv) to span the range of measured fNO and FNRin situ. The agreement between the box model and field observations of FNRin situ and fNO shows that the relationship is readily predictable up to FNRin situ of ~4 with known chemistry if OH exposure is considered.

Fig. 3. Observed relationships between fNO, FNR, and RO2 bimolecular lifetime.

Fig. 3.

Transect averaged (error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation) for measurement-based (A) fNO versus FNR and (B) fNO versus isoprene RO2 bimolecular lifetime, colored by the NO-to-NO2 ratio, for the sampled cities during the AEROMMA campaign. Reference isomerization lifetimes are shown for isoprene [kisom = 0.006 s−1 (93)], α-pinene [kisom = 0.28 s−1 (70)], and 2-ethoxy ethanol [kisom = 0.13 s−1 (69)]. Exponential fits to the experimental data are shown in both panels.

The RO2 lifetime with respect to bimolecular reactions with NO or HO2 or τbi (9, 10, 12, 34, 62) is also integral to this chemistry

τbi=1kRO2+NO[NO]+kRO2+HO2[HO2] (3)

where kRO2+NO is the bimolecular rate coefficient for isoprene RO2 reacting with NO (57), kRO2+HO2 is the bimolecular rate coefficient for isoprene RO2 reacting with HO2 (57), [NO] is the observed NO number density measured on the DC-8, and [HO2] is the estimated HO2 number density from Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model runs sampled along the DC-8 flight track described in Materials and Methods. RO2 + RO2 reactions are omitted because their bimolecular rates are typically slow (6365). Modeled urban plume HO2 was on average 25 ± 9 pptv (see fig. S10). To evaluate WRF-Chem HO2, we calculate β and compare with fNO, showing agreement within ±15% (see section S3.3 and fig. S11).

Figure 3A shows that observations of fNO from AEROMMA can mostly be explained with an isoprene box model or an exponential fit of the data (black dashed line). Transects that display NOx-saturated chemistry (upper left-hand sector of Fig. 3A) make up 38% of observations during AEROMMA and are predominately in the LA Basin or transects very close to urban centers. NOx-sensitive chemistry is plotted in the lower right-hand sector of Fig. 3A, comprising 36% of observations, mainly downwind of NYC, Chicago, and Toronto. The absence of fNO data below 0.55 and a small amount of points below 0.70 in Fig. 3A suggest that isoprene RO2 reactions with NO were the prevailing fate during AEROMMA, likely due to the campaign’s emphasis on sampling urban areas or the limited presence of low-NO oxidation conditions. The remaining 26% of observations fall in the lower left-hand sector of Fig. 3A, where fNO and FNRin situ disagree in NOx sensitivity designation. This discrepancy may reflect regional differences in FNRin situ threshold definition, uncertainty in FNRin situ, or cases where fNO does not fully represent the urban plume. These points are predominately from the Chicago transects (46%) and largely correspond to instances where fNO and β disagree outside of uncertainty (fNO uncertainty = ±0.120.07). However, nearly half of the observations in this sector (46%) fall within the uncertainty of their respective thresholds (FNR = 1.8 ± 0.6; fNO = 0.9 ± 0.1). In addition, FNR integrates both direct emissions and the accumulated effects of photochemistry, which can bias photochemical regime determination, whereas fNO reflects the prompt production of isoprene oxidation products, providing information on recent oxidation conditions.

NYC, Chicago, and Toronto all displayed a mix of chemical regimes during AEROMMA, with notable variability depending on the proximity to the urban core. NYC was predominately NOx-sensitive (69% of transects) with longer τbi (23 ± 12 s) and moderate fNO (0.79 ± 0.1), but Hudson River transects near Manhattan were NOx-saturated (see fig. S12D), with shorter τbi (6 ± 3 s) and high fNO (0.92 ± 0.03). Chicago’s plume exhibited transitional chemistry, split between NOx-sensitive (38% of transects) chemistry over Lake Michigan and NOx-saturated (19% of transects) chemistry near downtown, where τbi averaged 9 ± 3 s and fNO was 0.90 ± 0.03. Similarly, Toronto’s plume was characterized with τbi (13 ± 5 s) and fNO (0.87 ± 0.06), resembling Chicago. Across these cities, NOx-saturated chemistry persisted near urban centers, while NOx-sensitive regimes were found outside of the urban plume and downwind (fig. S12). However, this analysis reflects only the urban areas with sufficient observational constraints on FNR and fNO and does not capture broader, biogenically influenced regions with limited data, where lower-NOx conditions and different RO2 fates are expected.

In contrast, Los Angeles was dominated by NOx-saturated chemistry throughout the basin (73%), with only limited NOx-sensitive (8%) transects on the east side of the basin (see fig. S12A). As a result, the LA Basin exhibited the shortest isoprene RO2 lifetimes, with an average τbi of 7 ± 6 s and even shorter lifetimes downtown (3 ± 2 s). These transects closest to downtown LA had the highest fNO (0.96 ± 0.02) and lowest FNRin situ (0.49 ± 0.2). Unlike NYC, Chicago, and Toronto, which all displayed mixed chemical regimes, LA’s consistently short τbi, low FNRin situ, and high fNO emphasize the dominance of NOx-saturated chemistry (RO2 + NO reactions) across the basin at flight altitude.

Role of RO2 isomerization in urban chemistry

Measured isoprene RO2 fate (fNO) does not consider isomerization, but the τbi can be compared to RO2 isomerization lifetimes (τisom = 1/kisom) to infer the importance of this pathway. For example, although certain isoprene RO2 rapidly isomerize to form hydroperoxy aldehydes (HPALDs) (9, 62), the bulk isoprene RO2 isomer pool isomerizes more slowly [kisom,bulk ~ 0.002 to 0.008 s−1 (298 K)], with τbi ~ 160 s. This has implications for other VOCs for which RO2 isomerization can lead to the production of HOMs (10, 12, 6669). We present our fNO as a function of estimated τbi in Fig. 3B. The average τbi estimated for isoprene during urban transects was 14 ± 10 s, ranging from 0.83 to 47 s. These values are much lower than those reported by Kenagy et al. (20 to 300 s) (34), reflecting the influence of the urban oxidation environment sampled during AEROMMA and the lack of observations under low-NO conditions that are more representative of the global background. However, the AEROMMA observationally constrained estimates of τbi are sufficiently long for isomerization chemistry to be an important chemical fate of other RO2 radicals in urban air, as proposed by Praske et al. (12).

The relatively slow bulk isomerization rate for isoprene RO2 means that a small fraction of these isomerize. Many RO2 derived from other VOCs have much faster isomerization rates than those from isoprene. For example, α-pinene and 2-ethoxy ethanol [kisom,2EE = 0.13 s−1 (294 K); kisom,apine = 0.28 s−1 (298 K); τisom,2EE = 7.7 s; τisom,apine = 3.6 s−1] (66, 6871) and even moderate RO2 bimolecular lifetimes (e.g., τbi > ~3 s) can lead to a substantial fraction of isomerization for certain VOCs. As will be shown below, moderate to high (τbi > ~3 s) RO2 bimolecular lifetimes are prevalent in urban regions across North America. The fraction of RO2 isomerizing (fisom) can be defined similarly to fNO in Eq. 1

fisom=kisom1/τbi+kisom (4)

kisom is for the first-generation RO2 isomer of interest (at 298 K), and isomerization rates are highly dependent on the VOC and temperature. Master Chemical Mechanism (version 3.3.1) RO2 + NO and RO2 + HO2 rate constant expressions are used in Eq. 4. In addition to isoprene, we examine the anthropogenic VOCs 2-ethoxy ethanol and hexanal [kisom,hexanal = ~0.2 s−1 (298 K)] and α-pinene as important biogenic SOA precursors (69, 72, 73). These VOCs span key source sectors, including biogenic emissions, volatile chemical products, and cooking, and have either modeled or measured RO2 isomerization rates. We report only the fraction of RO2 that isomerize at the rates reported above to account for large differences in RO2 isomer–specific isomerization rates (i.e., only certain RO2 isomers isomerize fast enough for this chemistry to matter). In the case of α-pinene, the total fisom is weighted by the fraction of RO2 formed that isomerize rapidly (22%) (73). The estimated fisom from AEROMMA data varied not only between VOCs but also between cities. The LA Basin had the lowest fraction on average because of the short τbi (isoprene: 4 ± 3%; 2-ethoxyethanol: 28 ± 14%; hexanal: 35 ± 15%; α-pinene: 12 ± 4%). The cities with longer τbi (NYC, Chicago, and Toronto) displayed much higher average isomerization fractions (isoprene: 9 ± 5%; 2-ethoxyethanol: 44 ± 11%; hexanal: 51 ± 10%; α-pinene: 17 ± 3%). We calculate fisom for typical conditions during AEROMMA, and it is apparent that isomerization chemistry will become more prevalent with decreasing NO (see fig. S13). These isomerization processes lead to lower-volatility HOMs, which have been shown to contribute to SOA formation (see section S3.8 and table S2) (38, 40, 41, 73).

Chemical regimes observed by TEMPO

Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO; first light August 2023 during AEROMMA) retrieves tropospheric NO2 and HCHO columns hourly over North America. Average August 2023 maps of TEMPO FNRremote and fNO derived from correlations between FNRin situ and fNO are shown in fig. S14 and S15. TEMPO hourly data are averaged for the entire month of August 2023 from 1300 to 1700 PDT (Pacific daylight time), which overlaps with typical aircraft sampling hours. Exponential fits to fNO and τbi versus FNRin situ in urban plumes during AEROMMA are used to produce fig. S15 and Fig. 4 (see figs. S16 and S17). Data filtering applied to FNRremote (see Materials and Methods) in Fig. 4 largely excludes regions of North America without high tropospheric NO2 or HCHO columns, highlighting urban areas. FNRin situ values from the DC-8 during AEROMMA agree in magnitude, and spatial distribution with monthly averaged TEMPO retrieved FNRremote values in most cases (see figs. S18 to S20). AEROMMA-derived τbi maps of sampled cities are shown in Fig. 4. As was shown with the AEROMMA data, urban areas share similar FNRremote, fNO, and τbi values across North America, indicating a widespread prevalence of RO2 isomerization. TEMPO enables near-real-time, continental-scale constraints on chemical regimes, but interpretation of satellite-derived proxies requires appropriate context. In this work, we demonstrate correlation between fNO, τbi, and FNRin situ (fig. S16 and S17), providing a chemistry-based linkage to FNRremote. Extension of these relationships to TEMPO FNRremote introduces uncertainty because the retrieval is column integrated, is temporally averaged, and reflects chemistry integrated over several hours. Accordingly, TEMPO-derived regime patterns should be interpreted as broad, regional indicators rather than instantaneous local constraints, within which this analysis provides observationally constrained maps of τbi at the continental scale.

Fig. 4. Satellite mapping of RO2 bimolecular lifetime using in situ constraints.

Fig. 4.

TEMPO satellite retrieval for 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. PDT average for the month of August 2023 of τbi as estimated with the relationship to FNRin situ determined during AEROMMA. Data are filtered on the basis of the published thresholds for HCHO and NO2 (see Materials and Methods).

These data show that isomerization for certain VOCs is a widely prevalent RO2 fate in urban environments, which likely affects organic composition. Current state-of-the-art models (e.g., Goddard Earth Observing System–Chem, Community Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Multiphase Mechanism) have only recently included this chemistry (7375), necessitating careful model and measurement comparisons. As was shown in Fig. 3B, the relationship between fNO and τbi predicts an increasing importance in RO2 isomerization reactions as NO mixing ratios continue to decrease. While decreasing NOx levels are predicted to decrease OH and offset SOA from isomerization products (73), for α-pinene, 2-ethoxy ethanol, and hexanal, the prevalence of RO2 isomerization reactions in urban areas, at current NOx and OH levels, is already high. This widespread occurrence of RO2 isomerization and its known temperature dependence may contribute to the formation of HOMs, which in turn could be a contributing factor in SOA formation in NYC and LA along with other processes, such as wildfire influences or temperature-dependent VOC emissions (7679). In addition, it has been recently shown that the nationwide decreasing NOx/VOC ratio, an indicator of the reaction partner of OH (i.e., to make RO2 or to form HNO3), has an important impact on the NOx loss, increasing the importance of RO2 + NO compared to OH + NO2 → HNO3 (80). These findings highlight the importance of incorporating more RO2 isomerization chemistry in reduced chemical mechanisms to accurately predict future air quality trends in a changing NOx landscape.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aircraft measurements and 2023 campaign description

The AEROMMA mission used the instrumented NASA DC-8 research aircraft during the summer of 2023 to sample urban pollution plumes from four North American cities (see fig. S21) (81). Isoprene oxidation products (∑IHN and ∑[ISOPOOH + IEPOX]) were measured by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) I CIMS and California Institute of Technology CF3O CIMS (see fig. S22) (82, 83). The NOAA I CIMS was calibrated after the campaign in the same manner as described by Robinson et al. (84), but isomer distributions were updated with flight-by-flight box models (described below) representative of aircraft sampling conditions. Additional details of the NOAA I CIMS measurements are shown in section S1.2.

In addition to isoprene oxidation products, NOx, aerosol pH, aerosol liquid water (ALW), total aerosol surface area, methyl vinyl ketone (MVK), and methacrolein (MACR) were used to constrain the heterogeneous losses of isoprene oxidation products and to estimate average isoprene system OH exposure. NOx was measured via a custom two-channel NO laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) instrument with a blue light converter to measure NO2 (85). Formaldehyde (HCHO) was measured via a custom LIF instrument (86). Nitric acid (HNO3) was measured with the California Institute of Technology CF3O CIMS (82, 83). MVK and MACR were measured using a custom-built whole air canister system analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (87). Each canister was analyzed by custom, two-channel gas chromatography–mass spectrometry with a 20-min duty cycle per sample. Canister samples are analyzed in series using quadrupole mass spectrometry (Agilent 5975C). Samples were analyzed postflight, typically within 48 hours of sampling. OH reactivity was measured by flash photolysis and LIF (88). Aerosol pH and ALW were determined by ISORROPIA-lite run in forward mode, constrained by high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometer nonrefractory mass concentrations, nonvolatile cations measured by ion chromatography of particle-into-liquid samples, gas phase NH3 and HNO3, relative humidity, and temperature (see fig. S23). The total aerosol volume and surface area (see fig. S24) were derived from a complete size-resolved aerosol composition profile and adjusted for ambient relative humidity. Additional details of measurements are shown in section S1 and table S3.

fNO and FNR uncertainty

We quantified uncertainties in both fNO and FNR using a Monte Carlo approach that propagates measurement and yield uncertainties. We use nominal measurements (IHN, ∑[ISOPOOH + IEPOX], HCHO, and NO2) and product branching ratios from the literature (αIHN, αISOPOOH, and αIEPOX). Each parameter was assigned a log-normal uncertainty distribution defined by its nominal value and reported uncertainty (see table S3 for measurement uncertainties). Because of the wide-ranging mixing ratios observed during AEROMMA, we take three cases (LA, Chicago, and NYC) spanning the range of measurements. For each case, we draw 2 × 105 Monte Carlo samples, evaluate fNO and FNR, and report the resulting probability distribution, mean, and 95% confidence interval (89, 90). The probability distribution functions and associated uncertainties for both fNO and FNR for each case are shown in figs. S1 to S3.

Isoprene oxidation timescales and corrections

We apply a sequential reaction model to estimate the OH exposure that isoprene and its products experienced, following approaches used previously from field data (91, 92). This sequential reaction model (see section S2) uses MVK and MACR ratios to isoprene to estimate isoprene system OH exposures, which ranged from 1.1 × 1010 to 5.1 × 1010 molecules cm−3 s (average ± standard deviation: 2.3 ± 0.7 × 1010 molecules cm−3 s) (fig. S4) during AEROMMA urban sampling. Anthropogenic VOC OH exposure (average ± standard deviation: 8.3 ± 2.6 × 1010 molecules cm−3 s) is higher than isoprene OH exposures during AEROMMA. The same sequential reaction model can be applied to the ground site observations in Pasadena to estimate isoprene OH exposure, which ranged from 0.15 × 1010 to 3.4 × 1010 molecules cm−3 s (average ± standard deviation: 0.95 ± 0.5 x 1010 molecules cm−3 s) (fig. S4). We use these measured isoprene system OH exposures to evaluate box models to the appropriate chemical timescales as well as correct ∑[ISOPOOH + IEPOX] signal.

We apply a correction to the ∑[ISOPOOH + IEPOX] signal measured by I CIMS to correct for differences in sensitivity for each isomer (see section S1.4). The fraction of ISOPOOH is determined flight by flight (see fig. S25) from individual isoprene box models constrained to meteorology (temperature, pressure, and photolysis) and parameters affecting heterogenous loss processes (ALW, aerosol pH, aerosol surface area, and aerosol mean radius) and evaluated at isoprene OH exposures observed across each flight (see section S2.3). The impact of this isomer distribution on I CIMS sensitivity was found to be ±15%, well within typical CIMS uncertainties (see fig. S26).

We use fNO to estimate production rates of ∑IHN and ∑[ISOPOOH + IEPOX], which relies on short oxidation timescales (where OH dictates loss processes). A high background of either IHN or ∑[ISOPOOH + IEPOX] could skew fNO in the direction of the high-background molecule. As there is very little NO outside of the urban plumes measured, the ∑IHN background is generally quite low during AEROMMA and SUNVEx. Because of HO2 being an important bimolecular reaction partner outside of urban air, we have implemented a background subtraction for ∑[ISOPOOH + IEPOX] mixing ratios in both the AEROMMA and SUNVEx datasets (see section S1.7, table S4, and fig. S27).

HO2 estimate from the regional chemical model

An estimate of HO2 was derived from WRF-Chem, sampled along the DC-8 flight track (see fig. S10). Three WRF-Chem simulations were conducted to cover the AEROMMA spatial and temporal domain, one centered on Chicago, one centered on NYC (which included Toronto), and one covering the conterminous United States for LA flights. Detailed descriptions of these WRF-Chem setups can be found in section S2.4. HO2 has little impact on the determined τbi and β for moderate to high NO (NO >100 pptv; see fig. S28).

FNR TEMPO data

We build FNRremote maps from L3 TEMPO qualified data (main_data_quality_flag = 0) and filtered for effective cloud fraction <0.2, with tropospheric NO2 (https://doi.org/10.5067/IS-40e/TEMPO/NO2_L3.003) and total HCHO (https://doi.org/10.5067/IS-40e/TEMPO/HCHO_L3.003) version 3 columns. On the basis of FNRremote error quantification and validation work done for TROPOMI satellite retrieval products, we have disregarded data below a threshold of 2.7 × 1015 molecules cm−2 for both tropospheric NO2 and HCHO columns. This is based on the work of Souri et al. (24), adjusted for monthly averaging (i.e., scaled by 1/√n).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Purdue PALMS-NG team for providing single-particle composition data. We acknowledge J. Surratt, A. Gold, Z. Zhang, R. Rice, and M. Fraeneheim from the University of North Carolina for synthesizing and providing the authentic standards of (1,2)-ISOPOOH and trans-β-IEPOX.

Funding:

CIRES researchers were in part supported by the NOAA cooperative agreements NA17OAR4320101 and NA22OAR4320151. We acknowledge the NOAA NESDIS Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Program for its support of AEROMMA flight operations. C.R.N., X.L., and G.G.A. thank NASA for funding the TEMPO mission and its operation through contracts NNL12AA09C and 80MSFC24CA004. S.T. acknowledge NOAA grant NA18OAR4310109. M.K.M. and R.W. acknowledge NOAA grant NA21OAR4310126-T1-01. E.R.D., A.E.S., N.D., K.E.K., J.M.S., J.K., and G.M.W. acknowledge support from NOAA AC4 grant NA21OAR4310137. J.J.M.A. acknowledge NASA FINESST grant 80NSSC22K1435.

Author contributions:

Investigation: M.A.R., C.M.J., G.N., S.T., J.M.R., J.A.N., P.R.V., J.P., K.Z., W.S.C., E.M.W., A.W.R., V.T., M.S., C.F., J.B.G., E.R.D., A.E.S., N.D., K.E.K., J.M.S., J.K., G.M.W., S.L., M.M.C., K.H.B., L.X., G.I.G., C.E.S., C.W., H.N.H., M.L., A.A., C.A.B., A.P., S.A., A.M.M., A.P.S., M.K.M., R.W., E.L., I.P., K.B., J.D.C., P.O.W., A.N., A.S., B.B., A.N., A.S., H.F., J.P.D., G.S.D., J.J.M.A., R.B.P., C.H., S.W., R.S., G.G.A., C.R.N., X.L., and N.H. Data curation: M.A.R., C.M.J., G.N., S.T., J.M.R., J.A.N., P.R.V., J.P., K.Z., W.S.C., E.M.W., A.W.R., V.T., M.S., C.F., J.B.G., E.R.D., A.E.S., N.D., K.E.K., J.M.S., J.K., G.M.W., S.L., M.M.C., K.H.B., L.X., G.I.G., C.E.S., C.W., H.N.H., M.L., A.A., C.A.B., A.P., S.A., A.M.M., A.P.S., M.K.M., R.W., E.L., I.P., K.B., J.D.C., P.O.W., A.N., A.S., B.B., A.N., A.S., H.F., J.P.D., G.S.D., J.J.M.A., R.B.P., C.H., S.W., R.S., G.G.A., C.R.N., X.L., and N.H. Formal analysis: M.A.R., J.J.M.A., H.N.H., M.K.M., and R.W. Visualization: M.A.R. Writing—original draft: M.A.R. Writing—review and editing: all authors.

Competing interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data, code, and materials availability:

All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. All materials used in this study are described in detail in Materials and Methods and/or the Supplementary Materials. The SUNVEx field campaign data are available at https://csl.noaa.gov/groups/csl7/measurements/2021sunvex/GroundLA/DataDownload/DataDownloadAll.html. The AEROMMA field campaign data are available at https://csl.noaa.gov/projects/aeromma/data.html.

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S30

Tables S1 to S6

References

sciadv.aea6509_sm.pdf (10.1MB, pdf)

REFERENCES

  • 1.EPA, “Policy Assessment for the Review of the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards” (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2020); www.epa.gov/naaqs/ozone-o3-standards-policy-assessments-current-review.
  • 2.Pye H. O. T., Ward-Caviness C. K., Murphy B. N., Appel K. W., Seltzer K. M., Secondary organic aerosol association with cardiorespiratory disease mortality in the United States. Nat. Commun. 12, 7215 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chameides W. L., The photochemical role of tropospheric nitrogen oxides. Geophys. Res. Lett. 5, 17–20 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Haagen-Smit A. J., Fox M. M., Photochemical ozone formation with hydrocarbons and automobile exhaust. Air Repair 4, 105–136 (1954). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Crutzen P. J., The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content. Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc. 96, 320–325 (1970). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Womack C. C., McDuffie E. E., Edwards P. M., Bares R., Gouw J. A., Docherty K. S., Dubé W. P., Fibiger D. L., Franchin A., Gilman J. B., Goldberger L., Lee B. H., Lin J. C., Long R., Middlebrook A. M., Millet D. B., Moravek A., Murphy J. G., Quinn P. K., Riedel T. P., Roberts J. M., Thornton J. A., Valin L. C., Veres P. R., Whitehill A. R., Wild R. J., Warneke C., Yuan B., Baasandorj M., Brown S. S., An odd oxygen framework for wintertime ammonium nitrate aerosol pollution in urban areas: NOx and VOC control as mitigation strategies. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 4971–4979 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pullinen I., Schmitt S., Kang S., Sarrafzadeh M., Schlag P., Andres S., Kleist E., Mentel T. F., Rohrer F., Springer M., Tillmann R., Wildt J., Wu C., Zhao D., Wahner A., Kiendler-Scharr A., Impact of NOx on secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from α -pinene and β -pinene photooxidation: The role of highly oxygenated organic nitrates. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 10125–10147 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang Z., Tsona N. T., Li J., Wang S., Xu L., You B., Du L., Effects of NO and SO2 on the secondary organic aerosol formation from the photooxidation of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene: A new source of organosulfates. Environ. Pollut. 264, 114742 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crounse J. D., Paulot F., Kjaergaard H. G., Wennberg P. O., Peroxy radical isomerization in the oxidation of isoprene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 13607 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crounse J. D., Nielsen L. B., Jørgensen S., Kjaergaard H. G., Wennberg P. O., Autoxidation of organic compounds in the atmosphere. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 3513–3520 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ehn M., Thornton J. A., Kleist E., Sipilä M., Junninen H., Pullinen I., Springer M., Rubach F., Tillmann R., Lee B., Lopez-Hilfiker F., Andres S., Acir I.-H., Rissanen M., Jokinen T., Schobesberger S., Kangasluoma J., Kontkanen J., Nieminen T., Kurtén T., Nielsen L. B., Jørgensen S., Kjaergaard H. G., Canagaratna M., Maso M. D., Berndt T., Petäjä T., Wahner A., Kerminen V.-M., Kulmala M., Worsnop D. R., Wildt J., Mentel T. F., A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol. Nature 506, 476–479 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Praske E., Otkjær R. V., Crounse J. D., Hethcox J. C., Stoltz B. M., Kjaergaard H. G., Wennberg P. O., Atmospheric autoxidation is increasingly important in urban and suburban North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 64–69 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chameides W., Lindsay R., Richardson J., Kiang C., The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study. Science 241, 1473–1475 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seinfeld J. H., Urban air pollution: State of the science. Science 243, 745–752 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Poppe D., Koppmann R., Rudolph J., Ozone formation in biomass burning plumes: Influence of atmospheric dilution. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 3823–3826 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Edwards P. M., Brown S. S., Roberts J. M., Ahmadov R., Banta R. M., deGouw J. A., Dubé W. P., Field R. A., Flynn J. H., Gilman J. B., Graus M., Helmig D., Koss A., Langford A. O., Lefer B. L., Lerner B. M., Li R., Li S.-M., McKeen S. A., Murphy S. M., Parrish D. D., Senff C. J., Soltis J., Stutz J., Sweeney C., Thompson C. R., Trainer M. K., Tsai C., Veres P. R., Washenfelder R. A., Warneke C., Wild R. J., Young C. J., Yuan B., Zamora R., High winter ozone pollution from carbonyl photolysis in an oil and gas basin. Nature 514, 351–354 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mazzuca G. M., Ren X., Loughner C. P., Estes M., Crawford J. H., Pickering K. E., Weinheimer A. J., Dickerson R. R., Ozone production and its sensitivity to NOx and VOCs: Results from the DISCOVER-AQ field experiment, Houston 2013. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 14463–14474 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McDuffie E. E., Edwards P. M., Gilman J. B., Lerner B. M., Dubé W. P., Trainer M., Wolfe D. E., Angevine W. M., deGouw J., Williams E. J., Tevlin A. G., Murphy J. G., Fischer E. V., McKeen S., Ryerson T. B., Peischl J., Holloway J. S., Aikin K., Langford A. O., Senff C. J., Alvarez R. J., Hall S. R., Ullmann K., Lantz K. O., Brown S. S., Influence of oil and gas emissions on summertime ozone in the Colorado Northern Front Range. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 8712–8729 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Robinson M. A., Decker Z. C. J., Barsanti K. C., Coggon M. M., Flocke F. M., Franchin A., Fredrickson C. D., Gilman J. B., Gkatzelis G. I., Holmes C. D., Lamplugh A., Lavi A., Middlebrook A. M., Montzka D. M., Palm B. B., Peischl J., Pierce B., Schwantes R. H., Sekimoto K., Selimovic V., Tyndall G. S., Thornton J. A., Van Rooy P., Warneke C., Weinheimer A. J., Brown S. S., Variability and time of day dependence of ozone photochemistry in Western wildfire plumes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 10280–10290 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kleinman L. I., Daum P. H., Lee J. H., Lee Y.-N., Nunnermacker L. J., Springston S. R., Newman L., Weinstein-Lloyd J., Sillman S., Dependence of ozone production on NO and hydrocarbons in the troposphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2299–2302 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kleinman L. I., The dependence of tropospheric ozone production rate on ozone precursors. Atmos. Environ. 39, 575–586 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Edwards P. M., Young C. J., Aikin K., deGouw J., Dubé W. P., Geiger F., Gilman J., Helmig D., Holloway J. S., Kercher J., Lerner B., Martin R., McLaren R., Parrish D. D., Peischl J., Roberts J. M., Ryerson T. B., Thornton J., Warneke C., Williams E. J., Brown S. S., Ozone photochemistry in an oil and natural gas extraction region during winter: Simulations of a snow-free season in the Uintah Basin, Utah. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 8955–8971 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rickly P. S., Coggon M. M., Aikin K. C., Alvarez R. J., Baidar S., Gilman J. B., Gkatzelis G. I., Harkins C., He J., Lamplugh A., Langford A. O., McDonald B. C., Peischl J., Robinson M. A., Rollins A. W., Schwantes R. H., Senff C. J., Warneke C., Brown S. S., Influence of wildfire on urban ozone: An observationally constrained box modeling study at a site in the Colorado front range. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 1257–1267 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Souri A. H., Johnson M. S., Wolfe G. M., Crawford J. H., Fried A., Wisthaler A., Brune W. H., Blake D. R., Weinheimer A. J., Verhoelst T., Compernolle S., Pinardi G., Vigouroux C., Langerock B., Choi S., Lamsal L., Zhu L., Sun S., Cohen R. C., Min K.-E., Cho C., Philip S., Liu X., Chance K., Characterization of errors in satellite-based HCHO/NO2 tropospheric column ratios with respect to chemistry, column-to-PBL translation, spatial representation, and retrieval uncertainties. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 1963–1986 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sillman S., The use of NOy, H2O2, and HNO3 as indicators for ozone-NOx-hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 100, 14175–14188 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Martin R. V., Fiore A. M., Van Donkelaar A., Space-based diagnosis of surface ozone sensitivity to anthropogenic emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, 2004GL019416 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Duncan B. N., Yoshida Y., Olson J. R., Sillman S., Martin R. V., Lamsal L., Hu Y., Pickering K. E., Retscher C., Allen D. J., Crawford J. H., Application of OMI observations to a space-based indicator of NOx and VOC controls on surface ozone formation. Atmos. Environ. 44, 2213–2223 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chameides W. L., Fehsenfeld F., Rodgers M. O., Cardelino C., Martinez J., Parrish D., Lonneman W., Lawson D. R., Rasmussen R. A., Zimmerman P., Greenberg J., Mlddleton P., Wang T., Ozone precursor relationships in the ambient atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 97, 6037–6055 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martin R. V., Jacob D. J., Chance K., Kurosu T. P., Palmer P. I., Evans M. J., Global inventory of nitrogen oxide emissions constrained by space-based observations of NO2 columns. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 108, 2003JD003453 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Martinez M., Harder H., Kovacs T. A., Simpas J. B., Bassis J., Lesher R., Brune W. H., Frost G. J., Williams E. J., Stroud C. A., Jobson B. T., Roberts J. M., Hall S. R., Shetter R. E., Wert B., Fried A., Alicke B., Stutz J., Young V. L., White A. B., Zamora R. J., OH and HO2 concentrations, sources, and loss rates during the Southern Oxidants Study in Nashville, Tennessee, summer 1999. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 108, 4617 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schroeder J. R., Crawford J. H., Fried A., Walega J., Weinheimer A., Wisthaler A., Müller M., Mikoviny T., Chen G., Shook M., Blake D. R., Tonnesen G. S., New insights into the column CH2O/NO2 ratio as an indicator of near-surface ozone sensitivity: CH2O/NO2 as indicator of O3 sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 8885–8907 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu L., Crounse J. D., Vasquez K. T., Allen H., Wennberg P. O., Bourgeois I., Brown S. S., Campuzano-Jost P., Coggon M. M., Crawford J. H., DiGangi J. P., Diskin G. S., Fried A., Gargulinski E. M., Gilman J. B., Gkatzelis G. I., Guo H., Hair J. W., Hall S. R., Halliday H. A., Hanisco T. F., Hannun R. A., Holmes C. D., Huey L. G., Jimenez J. L., Lamplugh A., Lee Y. R., Liao J., Lindaas J., Neuman J. A., Nowak J. B., Peischl J., Peterson D. A., Piel F., Richter D., Rickly P. S., Robinson M. A., Rollins A. W., Ryerson T. B., Sekimoto K., Selimovic V., Shingler T., Soja A. J., St. Clair J. M., Tanner D. J., Ullmann K., Veres P. R., Walega J., Warneke C., Washenfelder R. A., Weibring P., Wisthaler A., Wolfe G. M., Womack C. C., Yokelson R. J., Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes. Sci. Adv. 7, eabl3648 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Marais E. A., Jacob D. J., Jimenez J. L., Campuzano-Jost P., Day D. A., Hu W., Krechmer J., Zhu L., Kim P. S., Miller C. C., Fisher J. A., Travis K., Yu K., Hanisco T. F., Wolfe G. M., Arkinson H. L., Pye H. O. T., Froyd K. D., Liao J., McNeill V. F., Aqueous-phase mechanism for secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene: Application to the southeast United States and co-benefit of SO2 emission controls. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 1603–1618 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kenagy H. S., Heald C. L., Tahsini N., Goss M. B., Kroll J. H., Can we achieve atmospheric chemical environments in the laboratory? An integrated model-measurement approach to chamber SOA studies. Sci. Adv. 10, eado1482 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Newland M. J., Bryant D. J., Dunmore R. E., Bannan T. J., Acton W. J. F., Langford B., Hopkins J. R., Squires F. A., Dixon W., Drysdale W. S., Ivatt P. D., Evans M. J., Edwards P. M., Whalley L. K., Heard D. E., Slater E. J., Woodward-Massey R., Ye C., Mehra A., Worrall S. D., Bacak A., Coe H., Percival C. J., Hewitt C. N., Lee J. D., Cui T., Surratt J. D., Wang X., Lewis A. C., Rickard A. R., Hamilton J. F., Low-NO atmospheric oxidation pathways in a polluted megacity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 1613–1625 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nussbaumer C. M., Fischer H., Lelieveld J., Pozzer A., What controls ozone sensitivity in the upper tropical troposphere? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 12651–12669 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nussbaumer C. M., Kohl M., Pozzer A., Tadic I., Rohloff R., Marno D., Harder H., Ziereis H., Zahn A., Obersteiner F., Hofzumahaus A., Fuchs H., Künstler C., Brune W. H., Ryerson T. B., Peischl J., Thompson C. R., Bourgeois I., Lelieveld J., Fischer H., Ozone formation sensitivity to precursors and lightning in the tropical troposphere based on airborne observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 129, e2024JD041168 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bianchi F., Kurtén T., Riva M., Mohr C., Rissanen M. P., Roldin P., Berndt T., Crounse J. D., Wennberg P. O., Mentel T. F., Wildt J., Junninen H., Jokinen T., Kulmala M., Worsnop D. R., Thornton J. A., Donahue N., Kjaergaard H. G., Ehn M., Highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOM) from gas-phase autoxidation involving peroxy radicals: A key contributor to atmospheric aerosol. Chem. Rev. 119, 3472–3509 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rissanen M., Anthropogenic volatile organic compound (AVOC) autoxidation as a source of highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOM). J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 9027–9039 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang M., Chen D., Xiao M., Ye Q., Stolzenburg D., Hofbauer V., Ye P., Vogel A. L., Mauldin R. L., Amorim A., Baccarini A., Baumgartner B., Brilke S., Dada L., Dias A., Duplissy J., Finkenzeller H., Garmash O., He X.-C., Hoyle C. R., Kim C., Kvashnin A., Lehtipalo K., Fischer L., Molteni U., Petäjä T., Pospisilova V., Quéléver L. L. J., Rissanen M., Simon M., Tauber C., Tomé A., Wagner A. C., Weitz L., Volkamer R., Winkler P. M., Kirkby J., Worsnop D. R., Kulmala M., Baltensperger U., Dommen J., El-Haddad I., Donahue N. M., Photo-oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons produces low-volatility organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 7911–7921 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xiao M., Wang M., Mentler B., Garmash O., Lamkaddam H., Molteni U., Simon M., Ahonen L., Amorim A., Baccarini A., Bauer P. S., Chen D., Chiu R., Dada L., Duplissy J., Finkenzeller H., Fischer L., He X.-C., Heinritzi M., Hofbauer V., Kim C., Kürten A., Kvashnin A., Lehtipalo K., Liu Y., Mai H., Makhmutov V., Mathot S., Mauldin R., Onnela A., Petäjä T., Quéléver L. L. J., Rissanen M., Schuchmann S., Sipilä M., Stolzenburg D., Stozhkov Y., Tauber C., Tomé A., Wagner R., Yan C., Yang B., Ye P., Zha Q., Curtius J., Hansel A., Kirkby J., Kulmala M., Volkamer R., Winkler P. M., Worsnop D. R., Nie W., Donahue N. M., Hoyle C. R., Jiang J., Baltensperger U., Dommen J., El Haddad I., Anthropogenic organic aerosol in Europe produced mainly through second-generation oxidation. Nat. Geosci. 18, 239–245 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Peeters J., Nguyen T. L., Vereecken L., HOx radical regeneration in the oxidation of isoprene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 5935–5939 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Atkinson R., Atmospheric chemistry of VOCs and NOx. Atmos. Environ. 34, 2063–2101 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Claeys M., Graham B., Vas G., Wang W., Vermeylen R., Pashynska V., Cafmeyer J., Guyon P., Andreae M. O., Artaxo P., Maenhaut W., Formation of secondary organic aerosols through photooxidation of isoprene. Science 303, 1173–1176 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Carlton A. G., Wiedinmyer C., Kroll J. H., A review of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 4987–5005 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shrivastava M., Cappa C. D., Fan J., Goldstein A. H., Guenther A. B., Jimenez J. L., Kuang C., Laskin A., Martin S. T., Ng N. L., Petaja T., Pierce J. R., Rasch P. J., Roldin P., Seinfeld J. H., Shilling J., Smith J. N., Thornton J. A., Volkamer R., Wang J., Worsnop D. R., Zaveri R. A., Zelenyuk A., Zhang Q., Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing. Rev. Geophys. 55, 509–559 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu S., Barletta B., Hornbrook R. S., Fried A., Peischl J., Meinardi S., Coggon M., Lamplugh A., Gilman J. B., Gkatzelis G. I., Warneke C., Apel E. C., Hills A. J., Bourgeois I., Walega J., Weibring P., Richter D., Kuwayama T., FitzGibbon M., Blake D., Composition and reactivity of volatile organic compounds in the South Coast Air Basin and San Joaquin Valley of California. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 10937–10954 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cao C., Gentner D. R., Commane R., Toledo-Crow R., Schiferl L. D., Mak J. E., Policy-related gains in urban air quality may be offset by increased emissions in a warming climate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 9683–9692 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Coggon M. M., Gkatzelis G. I., McDonald B. C., Gilman J. B., Schwantes R. H., Abuhassan N., Aikin K. C., Arend M. F., Berkoff T. A., Brown S. S., Campos T. L., Dickerson R. R., Gronoff G., Hurley J. F., Isaacman-VanWertz G., Koss A. R., Li M., McKeen S. A., Moshary F., Peischl J., Pospisilova V., Ren X., Wilson A., Wu Y., Trainer M., Warneke C., Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2026653118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gu S., Guenther A., Faiola C., Effects of anthropogenic and biogenic volatile organic compounds on Los Angeles air quality. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 12191–12201 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pfannerstill E. Y., Arata C., Zhu Q., Schulze B. C., Woods R., Harkins C., Schwantes R. H., McDonald B. C., Seinfeld J. H., Bucholtz A., Cohen R. C., Goldstein A. H., Comparison between spatially resolved airborne flux measurements and emission inventories of volatile organic compounds in Los Angeles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 15533–15545 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Stockwell C. E., Coggon M. M., Schwantes R. H., Harkins C., Verreyken B., Lyu C., Zhu Q., Xu L., Gilman J. B., Lamplugh A., Peischl J., Robinson M. A., Veres P. R., Li M., Rollins A. W., Zuraski K., Baidar S., Liu S., Kuwayama T., Brown S. S., McDonald B. C., Warneke C., Urban ozone formation and sensitivities to volatile chemical products, cooking emissions, and NOx upwind of and within two Los Angeles Basin cities. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 25, 1121–1143 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Vermeuel M. P., Novak G. A., Alwe H. D., Hughes D. D., Kaleel R., Dickens A. F., Kenski D., Czarnetzki A. C., Stone E. A., Stanier C. O., Pierce R. B., Millet D. B., Bertram T. H., Sensitivity of ozone production to NOx and VOC along the Lake Michigan Coastline. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 10989–11006 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Geddes J. A., Pusede S. E., Wong A. Y. H., Changes in the relative importance of biogenic isoprene and soil NOx emissions on ozone concentrations in nonattainment areas of the United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 127, e2021JD036361 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nussbaumer C. M., Cohen R. C., The role of temperature and NOx in ozone trends in the Los Angeles Basin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 15652–15659 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pye H. O. T., Chan A. W. H., Barkley M. P., Seinfeld J. H., Global modeling of organic aerosol: The importance of reactive nitrogen (NOx and NO3). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11261–11276 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wennberg P. O., Bates K. H., Crounse J. D., Dodson L. G., McVay R. C., Mertens L. A., Nguyen T. B., Praske E., Schwantes R. H., Smarte M. D., St Clair J. M., Teng A. P., Zhang X., Seinfeld J. H., Gas-phase reactions of isoprene and its major oxidation products. Chem. Rev. 118, 3337–3390 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jenkin M. E., Young J. C., Rickard A. R., The MCM v3.3.1 degradation scheme for isoprene. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 11433–11459 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sebol A. E., Canty T. P., Wolfe G. M., Hannun R., Ring A. M., Ren X., Exploring ozone production sensitivity to NOx and VOCs in the New York City airshed in the spring and summers of 2017–2019. Atmos. Environ. 324, 120417 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Acdan J. J. M., Pierce R. B., Dickens A. F., Adelman Z., Nergui T., Examining TROPOMI formaldehyde to nitrogen dioxide ratios in the Lake Michigan region: Implications for ozone exceedances. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 7867–7885 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jin X., Fiore A., Boersma K. F., Smedt I. D., Valin L., Inferring changes in summertime surface ozone–NOx–VOC chemistry over U.S. Urban areas from two decades of satellite and ground-based observations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 6518–6529 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Teng A. P., Crounse J. D., Wennberg P. O., Isoprene peroxy radical dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 5367–5377 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jenkin M. E., Saunders S. M., Pilling M. J., The tropospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds: A protocol for mechanism development. Atmos. Environ. 31, 81–104 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tyndall G. S., Cox R. A., Granier C., Lesclaux R., Moortgat G. K., Pilling M. J., Ravishankara A. R., Wallington T. J., Atmospheric chemistry of small organic peroxy radicals. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106, 12157–12182 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jenkin M. E., Valorso R., Aumont B., Rickard A. R., Estimation of rate coefficients and branching ratios for reactions of organic peroxy radicals for use in automated mechanism construction. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 7691–7717 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Vereecken L., Müller J.-F., Peeters J., Low-volatility poly-oxygenates in the OH-initiated atmospheric oxidation of α-pinene: Impact of non-traditional peroxyl radical chemistry. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9, 5241 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Xu L., Møller K. H., Crounse J. D., Otkjær R. V., Kjaergaard H. G., Wennberg P. O., Unimolecular reactions of peroxy radicals formed in the oxidation of α-pinene and β-pinene by hydroxyl radicals. J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 1661–1674 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Berndt T., Peroxy radical processes and product formation in the OH radical-initiated oxidation of α-pinene for near-atmospheric conditions. J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 9151–9160 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yu H., Møller K. H., Buenconsejo R. S., Crounse J. D., Kjaergaard H. G., Wennberg P. O., Atmospheric photo-oxidation of 2-ethoxyethanol: Autoxidation chemistry of glycol ethers. J. Phys. Chem. A 127, 9564–9579 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Berndt T., Richters S., Jokinen T., Hyttinen N., Kurtén T., Otkjær R. V., Kjaergaard H. G., Stratmann F., Herrmann H., Sipilä M., Kulmala M., Ehn M., Hydroxyl radical-induced formation of highly oxidized organic compounds. Nat. Commun. 7, 13677 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Färber M., Fuchs H., Bohn B., Carlsson P. T. M., Gkatzelis G. I., Marcillo Lara A. C., Rohrer F., Vereecken L., Wedel S., Wahner A., Novelli A., Effect of the Alkoxy radical chemistry on the ozone formation from anthropogenic organic compounds investigated in chamber experiments. ACS ES&T Air 1, 1096–1111 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Barua S., Iyer S., Kumar A., Seal P., Rissanen M., An aldehyde as a rapid source of secondary aerosol precursors: Theoretical and experimental study of hexanal autoxidation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 10517–10532 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pye H. O. T., D’Ambro E. L., Lee B. H., Schobesberger S., Takeuchi M., Zhao Y., Lopez-Hilfiker F., Liu J., Shilling J. E., Xing J., Mathur R., Middlebrook A. M., Liao J., Welti A., Graus M., Warneke C., De Gouw J. A., Holloway J. S., Ryerson T. B., Pollack I. B., Thornton J. A., Anthropogenic enhancements to production of highly oxygenated molecules from autoxidation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 6641–6646 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Xu R., Thornton J. A., Lee B. H., Zhang Y., Jaeglé L., Lopez-Hilfiker F. D., Rantala P., Petäjä T., Global simulations of monoterpene-derived peroxy radical fates and the distributions of highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) and accretion products. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 5477–5494 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pye H. O. T., Place B. K., Murphy B. N., Seltzer K. M., D’Ambro E. L., Allen C., Piletic I. R., Farrell S., Schwantes R. H., Coggon M. M., Saunders E., Xu L., Sarwar G., Hutzell W. T., Foley K. M., Pouliot G., Bash J., Stockwell W. R., Linking gas, particulate, and toxic endpoints to air emissions in the Community Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Multiphase Mechanism (CRACMM). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 5043–5099 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Schervish M., Donahue N. M., Peroxy radical chemistry and the volatility basis set. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 1183–1199 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 77.B. C. Schulze, “Insights into the sources of atmospheric aerosols and greenhouse gases in California,” thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hass-Mitchell T., Joo T., Rogers M., Nault B. A., Soong C., Tran M., Seo M., Machesky J. E., Canagaratna M., Roscioli J., Claflin M. S., Lerner B. M., Blomdahl D. C., Misztal P. K., Ng N. L., Dillner A. M., Bahreini R., Russell A., Krechmer J. E., Lambe A., Gentner D. R., Increasing contributions of temperature-dependent oxygenated organic aerosol to summertime particulate matter in New York City. ACS ES&T Air 1, 113–128 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pfannerstill E. Y., Arata C., Zhu Q., Schulze B. C., Ward R., Woods R., Harkins C., Schwantes R. H., Seinfeld J. H., Bucholtz A., Cohen R. C., Goldstein A. H., Temperature-dependent emissions dominate aerosol and ozone formation in Los Angeles. Science 384, 1324–1329 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Romer Present P. S., Zare A., Cohen R. C., The changing role of organic nitrates in the removal and transport of NOx. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 267–279 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chace W. S., Womack C., Ball K., Bates K. H., Bohn B., Coggon M., Crounse J. D., Fuchs H., Gilman J., Gkatzelis G. I., Jernigan C. M., Novak G. A., Novelli A., Peischl J., Pollack I., Robinson M. A., Rollins A., Schafer N. B., Schwantes R. H., Selby M., Stainsby A., Stockwell C., Taylor R., Treadaway V., Veres P. R., Warneke C., Waxman E., Wennberg P. O., Wolfe G. M., Xu L., Zuraski K., Brown S. S., Ozone production efficiencies in the three largest United States cities from airborne measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 13306–13318 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Crounse J. D., McKinney K. A., Kwan A. J., Wennberg P. O., Measurement of gas-phase hydroperoxides by chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 78, 6726–6732 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Allen H. M., Crounse J. D., Kim M. J., Teng A. P., Ray E. A., McKain K., Sweeney C., Wennberg P. O., H2O2 and CH3OOH (MHP) in the remote atmosphere: 1. Global distribution and regional influences. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 127, 1–14 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Robinson M. A., Roberts J. M., Neuman J. A., Jernigan C. M., Xu L., Coggon M. M., Stockwell C. E., Warneke C., Peischl J., Gilman J. B., Lamplugh A., Rollins A. W., Zuraski K., Rivera-Rios J. C., Wang Y., Ng N. L., Liu S., Brown S. S., Veres P. R., Online calibration of a chemical ionization mass spectrometer for multifunctional biogenic organic nitrates. ACS ES&T Air 1, 1066–1083 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rollins A. W., Rickly P. S., Gao R.-S., Ryerson T. B., Brown S. S., Peischl J., Bourgeois I., Single-photon laser-induced fluorescence detection of nitric oxide at sub-parts-per-trillion mixing ratios. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 13, 2425–2439 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Cazorla M., Wolfe G. M., Bailey S. A., Swanson A. K., Arkinson H. L., Hanisco T. F., A new airborne laser-induced fluorescence instrument for in situ detection of formaldehyde throughout the troposphere and lower stratosphere. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 541–552 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lerner B. M., Gilman J. B., Aikin K. C., Atlas E. L., Goldan P. D., Graus M., Hendershot R., Isaacman-VanWertz G. A., Koss A., Kuster W. C., Lueb R. A., McLaughlin R. J., Peischl J., Sueper D., Ryerson T. B., Tokarek T. W., Warneke C., Yuan B., de Gouw J. A., An improved, automated whole air sampler and gas chromatography mass spectrometry analysis system for volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 10, 291–313 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Fuchs H., Stainsby A., Berg F., Dubus R., Färber M., Hofzumahaus A., Holland F., Bates K. H., Brown S. S., Coggon M. M., Diskin G. S., Gkatzelis G. I., Jernigan C. M., Peischl J., Robinson M. A., Rollins A. W., Schafer N. B., Schwantes R. H., Stockwell C. E., Veres P. R., Warneke C., Waxman E. M., Xu L., Zuraski K., Wahner A., Novelli A., Advances in an OH reactivity instrument for airborne field measurements. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 18, 881–895 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Marsaglia G., Tsang W. W., A fast, easily implemented method for sampling from decreasing or symmetric unimodal density functions. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 5, 349–359 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  • 90.M. Evans, N. Hastings, B. Peacock, Statistical Distributions (Wiley, ed. 2, 1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Roberts J. M., Marchewka M., Bertman S. B., Goldan P., Kuster W., De Gouw J., Warneke C., Williams E., Lerner B., Murphy P., Apel E., Fehsenfeld F. C., Analysis of the isoprene chemistry observed during the New England Air Quality Study (NEAQS) 2002 intensive experiment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, 2006JD007570 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wolfe G. M., Kaiser J., Hanisco T. F., Keutsch F. N., De Gouw J. A., Gilman J. B., Graus M., Hatch C. D., Holloway J., Horowitz L. W., Lee B. H., Lerner B. M., Lopez-Hilifiker F., Mao J., Marvin M. R., Peischl J., Pollack I. B., Roberts J. M., Ryerson T. B., Thornton J. A., Veres P. R., Warneke C., Formaldehyde production from isoprene oxidation across NOx regimes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 2597–2610 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Novelli A., Vereecken L., Bohn B., Dorn H.-P., Gkatzelis G. I., Hofzumahaus A., Holland F., Reimer D., Rohrer F., Rosanka S., Taraborrelli D., Tillmann R., Wegener R., Yu Z., Kiendler-Scharr A., Wahner A., Fuchs H., Importance of isomerization reactions for OH radical regeneration from the photo-oxidation of isoprene investigated in the atmospheric simulation chamber SAPHIR. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 3333–3355 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ryerson T. B., Andrews A. E., Angevine W. M., Bates T. S., Brock C. A., Cairns B., Cohen R. C., Cooper O. R., de Gouw J. A., Fehsenfeld F. C., Ferrare R. A., Fischer M. L., Flagan R. C., Goldstein A. H., Hair J. W., Hardesty R. M., Hostetler C. A., Jimenez J. L., Langford A. O., McCauley E., McKeen S. A., Molina L. T., Nenes A., Oltmans S. J., Parrish D. D., Pederson J. R., Pierce R. B., Prather K., Quinn P. K., Seinfeld J. H., Senff C. J., Sorooshian A., Stutz J., Surratt J. D., Trainer M., Volkamer R., Williams E. J., Wofsy S. C., The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study: CalNex 2010 FIELD PROJECT OVERVIEW. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 5830–5866 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Xu L., Coggon M. M., Stockwell C. E., Gilman J. B., Robinson M. A., Breitenlechner M., Lamplugh A., Crounse J. D., Wennberg P. O., Neuman J. A., Novak G. A., Veres P. R., Brown S. S., Warneke C., Chemical ionization mass spectrometry utilizing ammonium ions (NH4+ CIMS) for measurements of organic compounds in the atmosphere. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 15, 7353–7373 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 96.De Gouw J. A., Gilman J. B., Kim S.-W., Alvarez S. L., Dusanter S., Graus M., Griffith S. M., Isaacman-VanWertz G., Kuster W. C., Lefer B. L., Lerner B. M., McDonald B. C., Rappenglück B., Roberts J. M., Stevens P. S., Stutz J., Thalman R., Veres P. R., Volkamer R., Warneke C., Washenfelder R. A., Young C. J., Chemistry of volatile organic compounds in the Los Angeles Basin: Formation of oxygenated compounds and determination of emission ratios. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 2298–2319 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Veres P. R., Neuman J. A., Bertram T. H., Assaf E., Wolfe G. M., Williamson C. J., Weinzierl B., Tilmes S., Thompson C. R., Thames A. B., Schroder J. C., Saiz-Lopez A., Rollins A. W., Roberts J. M., Price D., Peischl J., Nault B. A., Møller K. H., Miller D. O., Meinardi S., Li Q., Lamarque J.-F., Kupc A., Kjaergaard H. G., Kinnison D., Jimenez J. L., Jernigan C. M., Hornbrook R. S., Hills A., Dollner M., Day D. A., Cuevas C. A., Campuzano-Jost P., Burkholder J. B., Bui T. P., Brune W. H., Brown S. S., Brock C. A., Bourgeois I., Blake D. R., Apel E. C., Ryerson T. B., Global airborne sampling reveals a previously unobserved dimethyl sulfide oxidation mechanism in the marine atmosphere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2113268118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Robinson M. A., Neuman J. A., Huey L. G., Roberts J. M., Brown S. S., Veres P. R., Temperature-dependent sensitivity of iodide chemical ionization mass spectrometers. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 15, 4295–4305 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Bertram T. H., Kimmel J. R., Crisp T. A., Ryder O. S., Yatavelli R. L. N., Thornton J. A., Cubison M. J., Gonin M., Worsnop D. R., A field-deployable, chemical ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 4, 1471–1479 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Lee B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker F. D., Mohr C., Kurtén T., Worsnop D. R., Thornton J. A., An iodide-adduct high-resolution time-of-flight chemical-ionization mass spectrometer: Application to atmospheric inorganic and organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 6309–6317 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ji Y., Huey L. G., Tanner D. J., Lee Y. R., Veres P. R., Neuman J. A., Wang Y., Wang X., A vacuum ultraviolet ion source (VUV-IS) for iodide–chemical ionization mass spectrometry: A substitute for radioactive ion sources. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 13, 3683–3696 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Breitenlechner M., Novak G. A., Neuman J. A., Rollins A. W., Veres P. R., A versatile vacuum ultraviolet ion source for reduced pressure bipolar chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 15, 1159–1169 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Roberts J. M., Neuman J. A., Brown S. S., Veres P. R., Coggon M. M., Stockwell C. E., Warneke C., Peischl J., Robinson M. A., Furoyl peroxynitrate (fur-PAN), a product of VOC–NOx photochemistry from biomass burning emissions: Photochemical synthesis, calibration, chemical characterization, and first atmospheric observations. Environ. Sci. Atmos. 2, 1087–1100 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Maier E. J., Aikin A. C., Ainsworth J. E., Stratospheric nitric oxide and ozone measurements using photoionization mass spectrometry and UV absorption. Geophys. Res. Lett. 5, 37–40 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  • 105.de Gouw J., Warneke C., Measurements of volatile organic compounds in the Earth’s atmosphere using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 26, 223–257 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Yuan B., Koss A. R., Warneke C., Coggon M., Sekimoto K., de Gouw J. A., Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry: Applications in atmospheric sciences. Chem. Rev. 117, 13187–13229 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Krechmer J., Lopez-Hilfiker F., Koss A., Hutterli M., Stoermer C., Deming B., Kimmel J., Warneke C., Holzinger R., Jayne J., Worsnop D., Fuhrer K., Gonin M., de Gouw J., Evaluation of a new reagent-ion source and focusing ion–molecule reactor for use in proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 12011–12018 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Crosson E. R., A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring atmospheric levels of methane, carbon dioxide, and water vapor. Appl. Phys. B 92, 403–408 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 109.C. Rella, J. Hoffnagle, D. Kim-Hak, “Quantification of atmospheric formaldehyde by near-infrared cavity ring-down spectroscopy,” in 20th EGU General Assembly, EGU2018, Proceedings from the Conference (European Geosciences Union, 2017), p. 11101. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Junkermann W., Platt U., Volz-Thomas A., A photoelectric detector for the measurement of photolysis frequencies of ozone and other atmospheric molecules. J. Atmos. Chem. 8, 203–227 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Zheng W., Flocke F. M., Tyndall G. S., Swanson A., Orlando J. J., Roberts J. M., Huey L. G., Tanner D. J., Characterization of a thermal decomposition chemical ionization mass spectrometer for the measurement of peroxy acyl nitrates (PANs) in the atmosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 6529–6547 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Guo H., Campuzano-Jost P., Nault B. A., Day D. A., Schroder J. C., Kim D., Dibb J. E., Dollner M., Weinzierl B., Jimenez J. L., The importance of size ranges in aerosol instrument intercomparisons: A case study for the Atmospheric Tomography Mission. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 14, 3631–3655 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Bahreini R., Dunlea E. J., Matthew B. M., Simons C., Docherty K. S., DeCarlo P. F., Jimenez J. L., Brock C. A., Middlebrook A. M., Design and operation of a pressure-controlled inlet for airborne sampling with an aerodynamic aerosol lens. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 42, 465–471 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Bahreini R., Ervens B., Middlebrook A. M., Warneke C., De Gouw J. A., DeCarlo P. F., Jimenez J. L., Brock C. A., Neuman J. A., Ryerson T. B., Stark H., Atlas E., Brioude J., Fried A., Holloway J. S., Peischl J., Richter D., Walega J., Weibring P., Wollny A. G., Fehsenfeld F. C., Organic aerosol formation in urban and industrial plumes near Houston and Dallas, Texas. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 114, 2008JD011493 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Froyd K. D., Murphy D. M., Brock C. A., Campuzano-Jost P., Dibb J. E., Jimenez J.-L., Kupc A., Middlebrook A. M., Schill G. P., Thornhill K. L., Williamson C. J., Wilson J. C., Ziemba L. D., A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single-particle mass spectrometry. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12, 6209–6239 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Jacquot J. L., Shen X., Abou-Ghanem M., Froyd K. D., Lawler M., Schill G. P., Slovacek K., Thomson D. S., Cziczo D. J., Murphy D. M., A new airborne single particle mass spectrometer: PALMS-NG. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 58, 991–1007 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Brock C. A., Schröder F., Kärcher B., Petzold A., Busen R., Fiebig M., Ultrafine particle size distributions measured in aircraft exhaust plumes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 105, 26555–26567 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Williamson C., Kupc A., Wilson J., Gesler D. W., Reeves J. M., Erdesz F., McLaughlin R., Brock C. A., Fast time response measurements of particle size distributions in the 3–60 nm size range with the nucleation mode aerosol size spectrometer. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 3491–3509 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kupc A., Williamson C., Wagner N. L., Richardson M., Brock C. A., Modification, calibration, and performance of the ultra-high sensitivity aerosol spectrometer for particle size distribution and volatility measurements during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) airborne campaign. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 369–383 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Brock C. A., Williamson C., Kupc A., Froyd K. D., Erdesz F., Wagner N., Richardson M., Schwarz J. P., Gao R.-S., Katich J. M., Campuzano-Jost P., Nault B. A., Schroder J. C., Jimenez J. L., Weinzierl B., Dollner M., Bui T., Murphy D. M., Aerosol size distributions during the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom): Methods, uncertainties, and data products. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12, 3081–3099 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Brock C. A., Froyd K. D., Dollner M., Williamson C. J., Schill G., Murphy D. M., Wagner N. J., Kupc A., Jimenez J. L., Campuzano-Jost P., Nault B. A., Schroder J. C., Day D. A., Price D. J., Weinzierl B., Schwarz J. P., Katich J. M., Wang S., Zeng L., Weber R., Dibb J., Scheuer E., Diskin G. S., DiGangi J. P., Bui T., Dean-Day J. M., Thompson C. R., Peischl J., Ryerson T. B., Bourgeois I., Daube B. C., Commane R., Wofsy S. C., Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in situ measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 15023–15063 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Hu W., Palm B. B., Day D. A., Campuzano-Jost P., Krechmer J. E., Peng Z., De Sá S. S., Martin S. T., Alexander M. L., Baumann K., Hacker L., Kiendler-Scharr A., Koss A. R., De Gouw J. A., Goldstein A. H., Seco R., Sjostedt S. J., Park J.-H., Guenther A. B., Kim S., Canonaco F., Prévôt A. S. H., Brune W. H., Jimenez J. L., Volatility and lifetime against OH heterogeneous reaction of ambientisoprene-epoxydiols-derived secondary organic aerosol (IEPOX-SOA). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 11563–11580 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Marais E. A., Jacob D. J., Turner J. R., Mickley L. J., Evidence of 1991–2013 decrease of biogenic secondary organic aerosol in response to SO2 emission controls. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 054018 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Vasquez K. T., Crounse J. D., Schulze B. C., Bates K. H., Teng A. P., Xu L., Allen H. M., Wennberg P. O., Rapid hydrolysis of tertiary isoprene nitrate efficiently removes NOx from the atmosphere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 33011–33016 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wolfe G. M., Marvin M. R., Roberts S. J., Travis K. R., Liao J., The Framework for 0-D Atmospheric Modeling (F0AM) v3.1. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3309–3319 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Zhu Q., Schwantes R. H., Coggon M., Harkins C., Schnell J., He J., Pye H. O. T., Li M., Baker B., Moon Z., Ahmadov R., Pfannerstill E. Y., Place B., Wooldridge P., Schulze B. C., Arata C., Bucholtz A., Seinfeld J. H., Warneke C., Stockwell C. E., Xu L., Zuraski K., Robinson M. A., Neuman J. A., Veres P. R., Peischl J., Brown S. S., Goldstein A. H., Cohen R. C., McDonald B. C., A better representation of volatile organic compound chemistry in WRF-Chem and its impact on ozone over Los Angeles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 5265–5286 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Li F., Zhang X., Kondragunta S., Lu X., Csiszar I., Schmidt C. C., Hourly biomass burning emissions product from blended geostationary and polar-orbiting satellites for air quality forecasting applications. Remote Sens. Environ. 281, 113237 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Stockwell C. E., Bela M. M., Coggon M. M., Gkatzelis G. I., Wiggins E., Gargulinski E. M., Shingler T., Fenn M., Griffin D., Holmes C. D., Ye X., Saide P. E., Bourgeois I., Peischl J., Womack C. C., Washenfelder R. A., Veres P. R., Neuman J. A., Gilman J. B., Lamplugh A., Schwantes R. H., McKeen S. A., Wisthaler A., Piel F., Guo H., Campuzano-Jost P., Jimenez J. L., Fried A., Hanisco T. F., Huey L. G., Perring A., Katich J. M., Diskin G. S., Nowak J. B., Bui T. P., Halliday H. S., DiGangi J. P., Pereira G., James E. P., Ahmadov R., McLinden C. A., Soja A. J., Moore R. H., Hair J. W., Warneke C., Airborne emission rate measurements validate remote sensing observations and emission inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 7564–7577 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.He J., Harkins C., O’Dell K., Li M., Francoeur C., Aikin K. C., Anenberg S., Baker B., Brown S. S., Coggon M. M., Frost G. J., Gilman J. B., Kondragunta S., Lamplugh A., Lyu C., Moon Z., Pierce B. R., Schwantes R. H., Stockwell C. E., Warneke C., Yang K., Nowlan C. R., González Abad G., McDonald B. C., COVID-19 perturbation on US air quality and human health impact assessment. PNAS Nexus 3, pgad483 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Fast J. D., Gustafson W. I., Easter R. C., Zaveri R. A., Barnard J. C., Chapman E. G., Grell G. A., Peckham S. E., Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology-chemistry-aerosol model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, 10.1029/2005JD006721 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Grell G. A., Peckham S. E., Schmitz R., McKeen S. A., Frost G., Skamarock W. C., Eder B., Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmos. Environ. 39, 6957–6975 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Emmons L. K., Schwantes R. H., Orlando J. J., Tyndall G., Kinnison D., Lamarque J., Marsh D., Mills M. J., Tilmes S., Bardeen C., Buchholz R. R., Conley A., Gettelman A., Garcia R., Simpson I., Blake D. R., Meinardi S., Pétron G., The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). J. Adv. Model Earth Syst. 12, 10.1029/2019MS001882 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Koplitz S., Simon H., Henderson B., Liljegren J., Tonnesen G., Whitehill A., Wells B., Changes in ozone chemical sensitivity in the United States from 2007 to 2016. ACS Environ. Au 2, 206–222 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Bourgeois I., Peischl J., Thompson C. R., Aikin K. C., Campos T., Clark H., Commane R., Daube B., Diskin G. W., Elkins J. W., Gao R.-S., Gaudel A., Hintsa E. J., Johnson B. J., Kivi R., McKain K., Moore F. L., Parrish D. D., Querel R., Ray E., Sánchez R., Sweeney C., Tarasick D. W., Thompson A. M., Thouret V., Witte J. C., Wofsy S. C., Ryerson T. B., Global-scale distribution of ozone in the remote troposphere from the ATom and HIPPO airborne field missions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 10611–10635 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Pollack I. B., Lindaas J., Roscioli J. R., Agnese M., Permar W., Hu L., Fischer E. V., Evaluation of ambient ammonia measurements from a research aircraft using a closed-path QC-TILDAS operated with active continuous passivation. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12, 3717–3742 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Sullivan A. P., Pokhrel R. P., Shen Y., Murphy S. M., Toohey D. W., Campos T., Lindaas J., Fischer E. V., Collett J. L. Jr., Examination of brown carbon absorption from wildfires in the western US during the WE-CAN study. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 13389–13406 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Sullivan A. P., Guo H., Schroder J. C., Campuzano-Jost P., Jimenez J. L., Campos T., Shah V., Jaeglé L., Lee B. H., Lopez-Hilfiker F. D., Thornton J. A., Brown S. S., Weber R. J., Biomass burning markers and residential burning in the WINTER aircraft campaign. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 1846–1861 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Diskin G. S., Podolske J. R., Sachse G. W., Slate T. A., Open-path airborne tunable diode laser hygrometer. Proc. SPIE 4817, 196 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Bohn B., Lohse I., Calibration and evaluation of CCD spectroradiometers for ground-based and airborne measurements of spectral actinic flux densities. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 10, 3151–3174 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Lee L., Teng A. P., Wennberg P. O., Crounse J. D., Cohen R. C., On rates and mechanisms of OH and O3 reactions with isoprene-derived hydroxy nitrates. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 1622–1637 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.St. Clair J. M., Rivera-Rios J. C., Crounse J. D., Knap H. C., Bates K. H., Teng A. P., Jørgensen S., Kjaergaard H. G., Keutsch F. N., Wennberg P. O., Kinetics and products of the reaction of the first-generation isoprene hydroxy hydroperoxide (ISOPOOH) with OH. J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 1441–1451 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Bates K. H., Crounse J. D., St. Clair J. M., Bennett N. B., Nguyen T. B., Seinfeld J. H., Stoltz B. M., Wennberg P. O., Gas phase production and loss of isoprene epoxydiols. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 1237–1246 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S30

Tables S1 to S6

References

sciadv.aea6509_sm.pdf (10.1MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. All materials used in this study are described in detail in Materials and Methods and/or the Supplementary Materials. The SUNVEx field campaign data are available at https://csl.noaa.gov/groups/csl7/measurements/2021sunvex/GroundLA/DataDownload/DataDownloadAll.html. The AEROMMA field campaign data are available at https://csl.noaa.gov/projects/aeromma/data.html.


Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES