In the published article, there was an error in Table 5 as published. The table should have presented the agreement analysis for TILs semi-quantitative grading based on Kappa. The corrected Table 5 and its caption appear below.
TABLE 5.
Agreement analysis for TILs semi-quantitative grading.
| Comparison group | Kappa value (κ) | 95% confidence interval | Agreement strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathologist 1 vs. pathologist 2 | 1.000 | 1.000–1.000 | Almost perfect |
| AI pipeline vs. pathologist 1 | 0.833 | 0.500–1.000 | Almost perfect |
| AI pipeline vs. pathologist 2 | 0.833 | 0.500–1.000 | Almost perfect |
| Overall (Fleiss’Kappa) | 0.889 | 0.667–1.000 | Almost perfect |
Agreement strength was interpreted per Landis and Koch (1977): <0.00 poor; 0.00–0.20 slight; 0.21–0.40 fair; 0.41–0.60 moderate; 0.61–0.80 substantial; 0.81–1.00 almost perfect. Grading was based on three categories: low (<100 cells/HPF), moderate (100–300 cells/HPF), high (>300 cells/HPF).
The original article has been updated.
Footnotes
Edited and reviewed by: Rahul Singh Jasrotia, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, United States
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.