Abstract
Objectives
Predicting the carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is challenging due to their structural complexity and diverse biological activity. Carcinogenic potential is strongly influenced by molecular structure mainly ring arrangement and substitution patterns that affect metabolic activation and DNA reactivity. To improve predictive modeling, we compiled a dataset of 302 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons featuring novel topological indices-Bay, Fjord, Harbor, and Canyon (BFHC)-along with experimental carcinogenicity classifications, log P, and log Iball values. PAHs were further classified according to their fused-benzene ring topology as linear, angular (cata-condensed), or peri-condensed (clustered) structures. The BFHC indices were developed as part of a PhD dissertation (https://rcin.org.pl/publication/63491).
Data description
The dataset provides structural and experimental information for 302 PAHs, including both unsubstituted and hydrocarbon-substituted molecules (such as alkyl, benzyl, and small ring substituents). Each compound is characterized by XYZ Gaussian input files, IUPAC name, molecular structure, carbon and hydrogen counts, and counts of four topological indices - Bay, Fjord, Harbor, and Canyon -collectively referred to as BFHC indices. The dataset also includes experimental carcinogenicity classified into seven qualitative categories, physicochemical properties such as log P (131 compounds) and log Iball (117 compounds), and fused benzene ring-based topology classification (linear, angular, peri-condensed). The dataset is publicly available and suitable for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) and machine learning applications in toxicology and carcinogenic potency of PAHs.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-026-07791-w.
Keywords: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Carcinogenicity, BFHC indices, Fused benzene ring-based topology, QSAR
Objectives
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are abundant environmental pollutants that are composed of chemically diverse compounds with varying carcinogenic potential [1, 2]. Accurately predicting their carcinogenicity is challenging due to their structural diversity and the wide range of biological activities they exhibit. While many QSAR models have been proposed [3, 4], their generalizability is often limited by insufficient structural characterization or inconsistent data [5–7].
To address these gaps, we compiled a dataset of 302 PAHs, incorporating both unsubstituted and hydrocarbon-substituted molecules (e.g., alkyl, benzyl, and small ring substituents). While hydrocarbon substituents can influence local steric accessibility and metabolic processing of specific ring sites [6, 8], the present dataset does not directly encode electronic effects of substituents such as changes in electron density or HOMO–LUMO energies as such properties require quantum chemical descriptors which is outside the scope this data note.
Previous studies on substituted PAHs highlight how electron‑donating and electron‑withdrawing groups can influence metabolic activation and carcinogenic potential. Reviews of methylated and non‑methylated PAHs show that substitutions at reactive positions alter metabolic bioactivation and carcinogenic outcomes and that alkyl substituents can shift the metabolic pathways relevant to mutagenic and carcinogenic intermediates [9, 10]. Additionally, substituted derivatives such as oxygenated and nitrated PAHs often exhibit enhanced mutagenic or carcinogenic effects compared to parent PAHs [11]. These findings, combined with established evidence that several PAHs are carcinogenic in animals and humans [12]. This suggests that our current data sets could provide a good foundation for future extensions incorporating broader substituent chemistry to refine quantitative structure‑activity relationships.
We introduced novel structural indices-Bay, Fjord, Harbor, and Canyon regions (BFHC) - to characterize molecular topology along with their core fused benzene ring topology classification (linear, angular, peri-condensed) [6, 8, 13] that can be extensively used in carcinogenicity and toxicological researches of PAHs. Each PAH’s carcinogenic potency is classified based on the highest experimentally observed activity reported in peer-reviewed studies [1, 7, 14–23] providing a consistent reference scale for model development.
Hence, our focus is on BFHC indices and core fused benzene ring topology and structural concavities that have been mechanistically linked to metabolic activation pathways relevant to carcinogenic outcomes.
By integrating detailed topological descriptors (BFHC indices and along with the fused ring classes) with curated experimental carcinogenicity data and relevant physicochemical parameters, this dataset is designed to support the development and validation of improved QSAR and machine learning models for predicting PAH carcinogenicity as well as other toxicological investigations involving PAHs.
Data description
This dataset contains structural and experimental information for 302 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, all composed exclusively of carbon and hydrogen atoms. Each compound is represented by an XYZ Gaussian input file. The metadata table (PAH_Topological_Regions_Carcinogenicity_Data.xlsx in the dataset) includes the PAH xyz input file, the IUPAC name of the compound, its chemical structure. It also lists the number of carbon and hydrogen atoms, and provides BFHC indices and fused benzene ring-based topology classifications.
The BFHC indices are topological descriptors that capture the local geometry of PAH ring systems with the presence of four key structural motifs: Bay (B), Fjord (F), Harbor (H), and Canyon (C) regions. A Bay region (B) is a concave pocket formed between adjacent aromatic rings and is identified by a short four-atom path: X–sp²C–sp²C–Y, where X and Y are typically hydrogen-bearing sp² carbons [13]. Fjord regions (F) are V-shaped motifs involving a five-atom path (X–sp²C–sp²C–sp²C–Y), often introducing steric strain due to inward-facing hydrogens. Harbor regions (H) extend this pattern to six atoms (X–sp²C–sp²C–sp²C–sp²C–Y), forming wider angular cavities. Canyon regions (C) represent the deepest structural pockets, following a seven-atom sequence (X–sp²C–sp²C–sp²C–sp²C–sp²C–Y), commonly found in large or contorted PAHs. These indices provide a rich and detailed characterization of molecular topology and are especially useful for distinguishing structural isomers and understanding ring fusion patterns that may influence PAH reactivity or biological activity [18, 24].
To generate these indices, a python code was developed that uses a xyz Cartesian coordinates of the PAHs. The algorithm first calculates a distance matrix to identify bonded atoms based on covalent radii thresholds for carbon and hydrogen. An adjacency matrix is then constructed to represent molecular connectivity. Atom types and hybridizations are assigned by evaluating the degree of each atom in the adjacency matrix, distinguishing between hydrogen (H), sp, sp², and sp³ types, including hydrogen-bonded variants (e.g., sp²-H). Ring structures are identified using graph-theoretic approaches, allowing for classification by ring size (e.g., 5-, 6-, or 7-membered cycles) [25].
Topological motifs such as Bay, Fjord, Harbor, and Canyon regions are identified by detecting specific atomic paths across fused aromatic systems. For example, Bay regions are determined by a four-atom path that bridges adjacent rings through a common sp² carbon, while Fjord, Harbor, and Canyon motifs are identified by extending this path to five, six, and seven atoms, respectively, with geometric constraints to ensure structural validity. This systematic annotation enables consistent comparison across PAHs and supports high-quality feature generation for machine learning applications.
To further characterize core structure, each PAH is classified according to a fused benzene ring–based topology, reflecting how benzene rings are arranged and fused within the molecule [13, 26]. Three classifications are used: linear, angular (cata-condensed), and peri-condensed (clustered). A linear arrangement occurs when benzene rings are fused in a straight sequence, forming acene-type systems. Angular (cata-condensed) arrangements arise when rings are fused in bent or angular configurations, often associated with the formation of bay regions that influence chemical reactivity. Peri-condensed (clustered) arrangements occur in highly fused ring systems where multiple edges are shared between rings, generating compact structures with fjord, harbor, or canyon motifs.
These ring fusion topologies influence aromatic stabilization, steric strain, and the formation of bay and fjord regions, which are key structural features governing metabolic activation and carcinogenic potential in PAHs.
Each compound’s experimental carcinogenicity classification is recorded using a standardized seven-level scheme: non-carcinogenic (–), very low (±), low (L), low to moderate (LM), moderate (M), high to moderate (HM), and high (H) [1, 24]. In addition, physicochemical properties such as log P (octanol–water partition coefficient) [27, 28] and the log Iball index [29, 30] are included, where available log P values are reported for 131 compounds and log Iball values for 117 compounds.
Methodology summary
The dataset was developed through a combination of computational modeling, manual annotation, and literature-based data curation. This has the following key information:
Molecular Structure Generation: Molecular structures were prepared using Chem Draw while the xyz coordinates of the PAHs were prepared using Gaussian.
Topological descriptors: Bay, Fjord, Harbor, and Canyon- BFHC indices.
Fused benzene ring-based classification: Linear, angular (cata-condensed, peri-condensed(clustered).
Experimental Carcinogenicity: These information was compiled from peer-reviewed published sources and harmonized into a unified, qualitative classification system with following level catagories: “-“ or “L” : non-carcinogenic; “±”: very low level (almost inactive); “+”, LM : low moderate; M: moderate; HM: high moderate; H: high potency (extremely active).
Physicochemical Property: Log P values (octanol–water partition coefficients) and the log Iball index were collected from peer reviewed published literatures.
Python Code for BFHC Indices: A Python code/algorithm was developed to automate the identification of BFHC regions using xyz atomic coordinates of PAHs.
All the aforementioned datasets are publicly available in an open-access data repository, with corresponding DOIs listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Overview of datasets and data files in the repository
| Label | Name of data file/dataset | File type | Data repository and identifier (DOI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Set 1 | PAH_Topological_Regions_Carcinogenicity_Data | .xlsx | 10.6084/m9.figshare.29693360.v1 |
| Data Set 2 | Pah_xyz.tar | .tar | 10.6084/m9.figshare.29692925.v1 |
| Data Set 3 | Pah_Topological_Indices.py | .py | 10.6084/m9.figshare.29901779.v1 |
Limitations
Carcinogenicity classifications are based on the highest reported experimental effect and may reflect route or organ-specific activity rather than systemic toxicity. Physicochemical data are not fully complete, with log P reported for 131 compounds and log Iball for 117 compounds. Although the dataset includes unsubstituted and hydrocarbon-substituted PAHs (e.g., alkyl, benzyl, and small ring substituents), it does not include electronic substituent effects or heteroatom-containing functional groups.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
MW, PWA, MC and FHZ gratefully acknowledge the support of SHARCNET, Compute Canada, and the McMaster University computing facilities for providing the computational resources used in this work. MW, AH and RB acknowledges funding from the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) under grant number MPD/2009/1/styp8 and the Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Polish Academy of Sciences (IChF PAN) as well as Mekelle University for granting computational resources.
Abbreviations
- BFHC
Bay, Fjord, Harbor, Canyon indices
- DNA
Deoxyribonucleic Acid
- HOMO
Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital
- IUPAC
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
- LUMO
Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital
- PAH(s)
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon(s)
- QSAR
Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship
- log Iball
Iball Index descriptor for carcinogenic activity (logarithmic)
- log-P
Octanol–water partition coefficient (logarithmic)
Author contributions
MW searched and compiled the dataset and annotated the BFHC indices. PWA provided supervision, methodological design, and python coding. FHZ and MC involved in graphing and coding concept AH and RB provided supervision. Both authors approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) with grant number MPD/2009/1/styp8.
Data availability
The datasets described in this data note are fully publicly available and open-access in the Figshare repository at the following DOIs:- [10.6084/m9.figshare.29693360.v1](PAH_Topological_Regions_Carcinogenicity_Data.xlsx-Topological regions and carcinogenic activities)- [10.6084/m9.figshare.29692925.v1] (Pah_xyz.tar-PAHs structure archive) and [10.6084/m9.figshare.29901779.v1] (Pah_Topological_Indices.py-Python script for producing BFHC indices).
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Zhang L, Sannes K, Shusterman AJ, Hansch C. The structure-activity relationship of skin carcinogenicity of aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocycles. Chemico-Biol Interact. 1992;81:149–80. 10.1016/0009-2797(92)90032-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cavalieri E, Rogan E. The Molecular Etiology and Prevention of Estrogen-Initiated Cancers. Mol Aspects Med. 2014;0:1–55. 10.1016/j.mam.2013.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chung E, Russo DP, Ciallella HL, Wang Y-T, Wu M, Aleksunes LM, et al. Data-Driven Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling for Human Carcinogenicity by Chronic Oral Exposure. Environ Sci Technol. 2023;57:6573–88. 10.1021/acs.est.3c00648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li N, Qi J, Wang P, Zhang X, Zhang T, Li H. Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) study of carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in atmospheric particulate matter by random forest (RF). Anal Methods. 2019;11:1816–21. 10.1039/C8AY02720J. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hansch C, Hoekman D, Leo A, Weininger D, Selassie CD. Chem-Bioinformatics: Comparative QSAR at the Interface between Chemistry and Biology. Chem Rev. 2002;102:783–812. 10.1021/cr0102009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nguyen LH, Truong TN. Quantitative Structure–Property Relationships for the Electronic Properties of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. ACS Omega. 2018;3:8913–22. 10.1021/acsomega.8b00870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Villemin D, Cherqaoui D, Mesbah A. Predicting Carcinogenicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Back-Propagation Neural Network. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1994;34:1288–93. 10.1021/ci00022a010. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morshead ML, Truong L, Simonich MT, Moran JE, Anderson KA, Tanguay RL. Developmental toxicity of alkylated PAHs and substituted phenanthrenes: Structural nuances drive diverse toxicity and AHR activation. Chemosphere. 2025;370:143894. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Flesher JW, Lehner AF. Structure, function and carcinogenicity of metabolites of methylated and non-methylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a comprehensive review. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2016;26:151–79. 10.3109/15376516.2015.1135223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang D, Schramm V, Pool J, Pardali E, Brandenburg A, Rietjens IMCM, et al. The effect of alkyl substitution on the oxidative metabolism and mutagenicity of phenanthrene. Arch Toxicol. 2022;96:1109–31. 10.1007/s00204-022-03239-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cao W, Yuan J, Geng S, Zou J, Dou J, Fan F. Oxygenated and Nitrated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Sources, Quantification, Incidence, Toxicity, and Fate in Soil—A Review Study. Processes. 2022;11. 10.3390/pr11010052.
- 12.Jameson CW. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and associated occupational exposures. In: Baan RA, Stewart BW, Straif K, editors. Tumour Site Concordance and Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li P, Bian H, Yu H, Dou Y, Li P, Bian H, et al. Clar covering polynomials of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. MATH. 2024;9:13385–409. 10.3934/math.2024653. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cavalieri EL, Rogan EG, Roth RW, Saugier RK, Hakam A. The relationship between ionization potential and horseradish peroxidase/hydrogen peroxide-catalyzed binding of aromatic hydrocarbons to DNA. Chemico-Biol Interact. 1983;47:87–109. 10.1016/0009-2797(83)90150-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dipple A, Moschel RC, Bigger CAH. In: Chemical, Carcinogens, editors. Polynuclear aromatic carcinogens. 2nd ed. ACS; 1984. pp. 41–163.
- 16.Richard AM, Woo Y. A CASE-SAR analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogenicity. Mutat Research/Genetic Toxicol. 1990;242:285–303. 10.1016/0165-1218(90)90047-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cavalieri EL, Rogan EG. The approach to understanding aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogenesis. The central role of radical cations in metabolic activation. Pharmacol Ther. 1992;55:183–99. 10.1016/0163-7258(92)90015-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Birks JB. A Physical Theory of Carcinogenesis by Aromatic Hydrocarbons*. Nature. 1961;190:232–5. 10.1038/190232a0. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Purdy R. A mechanism-mediated model for carcinogenicity: model content and prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 25 organic chemicals. Environ Health Perspect. 1996;104(Suppl 5):1085–94. 10.1289/ehp.96104s51085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Badger GM. The Carcinogenic Hydrocarbons: Chemical Constitution and Carcinogenic Activity. Br J Cancer. 1948;2:309–50. 10.1038/bjc.1948.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vijayalakshmi KP, Suresh CH. Theoretical studies on the carcinogenic activity of diol epoxide derivatives of PAH: proton affinity and aromaticity as decisive descriptors. Org Biomol Chem. 2008;6:4384–90. 10.1039/B813008F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yuan M, Jurs PC. Computer-assisted structure-activity studies of chemical carcinogens: a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon data set. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1980;52:294–312. 10.1016/0041-008x(80)90117-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vendrame R, Braga RS, Takahata Y, Galvão DS. Structure-activity relationship studies of carcinogenic activity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using calculated molecular descriptors with principal component analysis and neural network methods. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1999;39:1094–104. 10.1021/ci990326v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Benigni R. Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Chemical Mutagens and Carcinogens: Mechanistic Investigations and Prediction Approaches. Chem Rev. 2005;105:1767–800. 10.1021/cr030049y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.May JW, Steinbeck C. Efficient ring perception for the Chemistry Development Kit. J Cheminform. 2014;6:3. 10.1186/1758-2946-6-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fetzer JC. The chemistry and analysis of large PAHs. Polycycl Aromat Compd. 2007;27:143–62. 10.1080/10406630701268255. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bond JA, Baker SM, Bechtold WE. Correlation of the octanol/water partition coefficient with clearance half-times of intratracheally instilled aromatic hydrocarbons in rats. Toxicology. 1985;36:285–95. 10.1016/0300-483x(85)90031-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sahu SK, Pandit GG. Estimation of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients for Polycylic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Using Reverse‐Phase HPLC. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2003;26:135–46. 10.1081/JLC-120017158. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Barone PMVB, Camilo A Jr, Galvão DS. Theoretical Approach to Identify Carcinogenic Activity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77:1186–9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Braga RS, Barone PMVB, Galvão DS. Identifying carcinogenic activity of methylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). J Mol Struct (Thoechem). 1999;464:257–66. 10.1016/S0166-1280(98)00557-0. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets described in this data note are fully publicly available and open-access in the Figshare repository at the following DOIs:- [10.6084/m9.figshare.29693360.v1](PAH_Topological_Regions_Carcinogenicity_Data.xlsx-Topological regions and carcinogenic activities)- [10.6084/m9.figshare.29692925.v1] (Pah_xyz.tar-PAHs structure archive) and [10.6084/m9.figshare.29901779.v1] (Pah_Topological_Indices.py-Python script for producing BFHC indices).
