Abstract
Struma ovarii is a rare ovarian tumor that can clinically and radiologically resemble other benign adnexal masses, creating diagnostic challenges, particularly in reproductive-age women in whom fertility preservation is a priority. We report the case of a 30-year-old nulliparous woman who presented with a one-month history of pelvic fullness and a palpable lower abdominal mass. Imaging demonstrated a large multiloculated left ovarian cyst, interpreted as a benign lesion. Tumor markers were within normal limits, and the patient was clinically euthyroid. She underwent fertility-sparing left ovarian cystectomy with ovarian reconstruction, and the diagnosis of struma ovarii was established following surgical excision and histopathological examination. The postoperative course was uneventful. Struma ovarii should be considered in the differential diagnosis of complex ovarian masses, even when imaging and tumor markers suggest a benign etiology. Histopathological confirmation is essential for accurate diagnosis and management. In benign cases, fertility-sparing surgery is an effective treatment option.
Keywords: fertility-sparing surgery, monodermal teratoma, multiloculated ovarian cyst, o-rads 3, ovarian cystectomy, struma ovarii
Introduction
Struma ovarii is a rare monodermal ovarian teratoma, accounting for approximately 0.5-1% of all ovarian tumors and 2-5% of ovarian teratomas [1,2]. It is characterized by the predominance of mature thyroid tissue and is usually benign. Thyrotoxicosis has been reported in a minority of patients, and malignant transformation is rare but documented [3,4].
Preoperative diagnosis of struma ovarii is challenging because its imaging appearance frequently overlaps with that of benign epithelial ovarian tumors, particularly mucinous and serous cystadenomas [5-7]. Even with modern imaging techniques, definitive preoperative identification remains difficult, especially in large multiloculated cystic lesions [6,7]. Typical imaging features may include multiloculated cystic architecture, variable internal echogenicity, and areas of solid components with vascularity; however, these findings are nonspecific and often mimic benign ovarian neoplasms.
Risk stratification tools such as the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) provide standardized assessment of adnexal masses; however, rare tumors such as struma ovarii may still be categorized as low-risk when classical malignant features are absent [8]. This diagnostic uncertainty complicates surgical planning, particularly in reproductive-age women desiring fertility preservation.
We report a case of a large benign struma ovarii that was misdiagnosed as a mucinous cystadenoma on imaging, highlighting diagnostic limitations, intraoperative decision-making regarding frozen section, and the potential future role of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted imaging in improving preoperative characterization of adnexal masses [9].
Case presentation
A 30-year-old gravida 0 para 0 healthy woman presented with a one-month history of lower-abdominal fullness and a palpable pelvic mass. She denied urinary or bowel symptoms and had regular menstrual cycles. She reported no personal or family history of thyroid disease.
Examination
The abdomen was soft and non-tender. A non-mobile, vaguely defined mass was palpable in the left lower abdomen.
Investigations
Tumor markers, including cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), Inhibin A/B, carcinoembryonic antigen, lactate dehydrogenase, and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, were all within normal limits. Thyroid function tests were not performed as the patient was clinically euthyroid.
Pelvic ultrasound demonstrated a bulky left ovary with a multilocular cystic lesion measuring 12.2 × 11.5 × 7.0 cm. The lesion contained multiple septations and intracystic solid mural nodules with internal vascularity on color Doppler. A neoplastic etiology was suspected (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Pelvic ultrasound.
Pelvic ultrasound demonstrating a multiloculated left ovarian cystic lesion with an internal solid mural nodule (white arrow) and thick septations (yellow arrow). Color Doppler reveals internal vascularity within the lesion (red arrow), raising suspicion for a neoplastic ovarian mass.
MRI of the pelvis confirmed a large (12 × 10 × 12.7 cm) multiloculated cyst with variable T1- and T2-weighted signal intensities and thin septa without significant mural nodular enhancement. The absence of diffusion restriction or significant solid enhancement supported a benign interpretation (O-RADS 3), reported as a mucinous cystadenoma (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Axial T2-weighted MRI showing a benign-appearing multiloculated ovarian cyst mimicking an epithelial neoplasm.
Axial pelvic MRI demonstrating a large multiloculated left adnexal cystic lesion. An internal septation (arrow) and a mural solid component (arrowhead) are identified, contributing to the preoperative suspicion of mucinous cystadenoma.
Treatment
A fertility-sparing cystectomy was performed via laparotomy due to the lesion’s size and the risk of rupture. Peritoneal washings were collected for cytological evaluation.
Pathology
Grossly, the specimen measured 9.5 × 5.5 × 4.5 cm and consisted of a multiloculated cyst with a smooth outer surface. Microscopically, >90% of the lesion was composed of thyroid follicles filled with colloid and lined by bland cuboidal to columnar epithelial cells (Figures 3, 4).
Figure 3. High-power histopathology (hematoxylin and eosin stain).
High-power image showing thyroid follicles lined by uniform cuboidal to low-columnar epithelial cells with bland nuclear morphology, consistent with benign struma ovarii.
Figure 4. Low-power histopathology (hematoxylin and eosin stain).
Low-power view showing abundant thyroid-type tissue composed of well-formed follicles filled with homogenous eosinophilic colloid, separated by delicate fibrous septa, features characteristic of struma ovarii.
Immunohistochemistry demonstrated strong thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) positivity, confirming thyroid differentiation (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Immunohistochemistry (TTF-1).
Immunohistochemical staining for thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) showing strong nuclear positivity in the follicular epithelial cells, confirming thyroid differentiation consistent with struma ovarii.
Cytological analysis was negative for malignant cells. The predominance of benign thyroid follicles without cytologic atypia, along with strong TTF-1 positivity, confirmed the diagnosis of benign struma ovarii and excluded malignant transformation. In the context of inconclusive imaging findings, histopathology played a decisive role in establishing the diagnosis and avoiding overtreatment. This case highlights the limitations of preoperative imaging in distinguishing rare monodermal teratomas from common epithelial ovarian neoplasms.
Postoperative recovery
The patient had an uncomplicated recovery and was discharged the next day in stable condition.
Follow-up
At the five-month follow-up, the patient was clinically well. Ultrasonography showed normal ovaries without residual or recurrent mass. CA-125, thyroid profile, and anti-Müllerian hormone levels were within normal limits, and no evidence of recurrence was identified.
Discussion
This case highlights the principal diagnostic challenge of struma ovarii, which often presents with nonspecific clinical features and imaging characteristics indistinguishable from common benign epithelial ovarian tumors [5-7]. Many patients remain clinically euthyroid and demonstrate normal CA-125 levels, further reducing preoperative suspicion [3,4,10].
Ultrasound and MRI findings in struma ovarii are variable and frequently overlap with those of mucinous cystadenomas. Sonographic appearances may include multiloculated cystic masses with internal echoes or echogenic nodules, though these features may be subtle or obscured in large lesions [1,3,6]. MRI findings reflect heterogeneous tissue composition but are rarely diagnostic, contributing to misclassification within benign risk categories such as O-RADS 3, as seen in this case [7,8].
In this case, classification as O-RADS 3 was primarily based on the multiloculated cystic morphology, absence of significant solid enhancement, and lack of diffusion restriction, all of which favored a benign etiology. However, the presence of internal mural nodules and vascularity represents a diagnostic gray zone, underscoring the limitation of standardized risk stratification systems in rare tumors such as struma ovarii.
Emerging evidence suggests that AI-assisted imaging analysis may enhance preoperative classification of adnexal masses by integrating radiologic, biochemical, and clinical data. Recent studies indicate that AI-supported diagnostic models can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary radical surgery, supporting fertility-preserving approaches in appropriate patients [9].
Benign struma ovarii has an excellent prognosis following complete excision. Although most cases are benign, malignant struma ovarii represents a distinct clinical entity, and case series and systematic reviews have described the role of adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy in selected patients [11,12]. Malignant transformation is uncommon but necessitates individualized management strategies based on tumor behavior and extent of disease [13]. Definitive histopathological diagnosis remains essential for guiding follow-up and counseling.
Intraoperative frozen section can assist surgical decision-making; however, its accuracy is limited in large, cystic, or heterogeneous tumors due to sampling error and histologic complexity [13,14]. Misinterpretation of thyroid tissue may lead to unnecessary radical surgery. In patients with reassuring imaging and tumor markers who desire fertility preservation, selective omission of frozen section may be appropriate, as demonstrated in this case [14]. This case emphasizes that rare entities such as struma ovarii may be misclassified as low-risk on imaging, and careful integration of clinical, radiological, and intraoperative findings is essential to guide appropriate and fertility-preserving management.
Fertility preservation is a key consideration in the management of struma ovarii, particularly in young nulliparous women. Several recent reports support conservative surgical approaches, such as cystectomy or unilateral oophorectomy, in benign disease when adequate ovarian tissue can be preserved [14]. Careful patient selection, thorough intraoperative assessment, and definitive histopathological confirmation are essential to balance oncologic safety with reproductive outcomes.
Conclusions
Struma ovarii remains a diagnostic masquerader that may be misclassified as a benign adnexal lesion on imaging, including O-RADS 3 categories. This case highlights the limitations of current preoperative assessment tools and reinforces the importance of histopathological confirmation. In carefully selected patients with reassuring clinical and radiologic features, fertility-sparing surgery without intraoperative frozen section may be considered. Emerging approaches, including AI-assisted imaging, may improve preoperative characterization of rare ovarian tumors. A limitation of this case is the absence of preoperative thyroid function testing, although the patient was clinically euthyroid.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Rizwana Anjum, Alaa Elghobashy
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Rizwana Anjum, Mohammad Tariq Mahmood, Alaa Elghobashy
Drafting of the manuscript: Rizwana Anjum
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Rizwana Anjum, Mohammad Tariq Mahmood, Alaa Elghobashy
Supervision: Alaa Elghobashy
References
- 1.Struma ovarii: role of imaging? Dujardin MI, Sekhri P, Turnbull LW. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:41–51. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0303-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clinical characteristics of struma ovarii. Yoo SC, Chang KH, Lyu MO, Chang SJ, Ryu HS, Kim HS. J Gynecol Oncol. 2008;19:135–138. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2008.19.2.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Diagnosis of struma ovarii with medical imaging. Shen J, Xia X, Lin Y, Zhu W, Yuan J. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36:627–631. doi: 10.1007/s00261-010-9664-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Clinical manifestations of malignant struma ovarii: a retrospective case series in a tertiary hospital in Korea. Ryu HJ, Leem DE, Yoo JH, Kim TH, Kim SW, Chung JH. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2024;39:461–467. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2023.1863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Struma ovarii: MRI findings. Matsuki M, Kaji Y, Matsuo M, Kobashi Y. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:87–90. doi: 10.1259/bjr.73.865.10721328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clinicopathological and imaging features of struma ovarii: a retrospective study. Chen M, Liao S, Xu Y, Ye X, Jia X, Zhang S. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1487812. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1487812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Struma ovarii: a case report and review the literature. Zamani F, Abdolrazaghnejad A, Ameli F, GHashghaee S, Nassiri S, Zamani N. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022;96:107318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.O-RADS US v2022: an update from the American College of Radiology's Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US Committee. Strachowski LM, Jha P, Phillips CH, et al. Radiology. 2023;308:0. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Application of ultrasound in combination with other methods in gynecological disease: artificial intelligence, surgery, and drugs. Shi S, Dai C, Liu D, Liu X. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1567024. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1567024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of malignant struma ovarii confined to the ovary. Li S, Yang T, Xiang Y, Li X, Zhang L, Deng S. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:383. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08118-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Malignant struma ovarii with a robust response to radioactive iodine. Gild ML, Heath L, Paik JY, Clifton-Bligh RJ, Robinson BG. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2020;2020:19–130. doi: 10.1530/EDM-19-0130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.The role of radioiodine therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer arising from struma ovarii: a systematic review. Bellini P, Dondi F, Zilioli V, et al. J Clin Med. 2024;13:7729. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.[Thyroid carcinoma on struma ovarii: diagnosis and treatment] Lebreton C, Al Ghuzlan A, Floquet A, Kind M, Leboulleux S, Godbert Y. Bull Cancer. 2018;105:281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Malignant struma ovarii: a case report and analysis of cases reported in the literature with focus on survival and I131 therapy. DeSimone CP, Lele SM, Modesitt SC. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;89:543–548. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00141-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





