Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Athletic Training logoLink to Journal of Athletic Training
. 1993 Winter;28(4):324–329.

Comparison of Inversion Restraint Provided by Ankle Prophylactic Devices Before and After Exercise

Natalie Martin 1,2, Rod A Harter 1,2
PMCID: PMC1317736  PMID: 16558248

Abstract

The prudence of prophylactic ankle taping continues to be questioned as recent studies have identified other forms of ankle stabilization as more effective means of injury prevention. The purpose of our study was to compare the effectiveness of three ankle prophylaxes (adhesive taping, lace-up brace, and semirigid orthosis) with a control condition (no support) in limiting inversion under dynamic loads imposed by repetitive walking (4 mph) and running (9 mph) on an 8.5° laterally tilted treadmill. Ten subjects participated in four separate testing sessions in which they were videotaped while walking and running on a tilted treadmill before and after 20 minutes of vigorous exercise. Average maximum inversion angle was determined through biomechanical analysis of rearfoot motion for each experimental condition and analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA and Scheffé post hoc tests. There were significant differences in the average maximum inversion angle between the ankle devices at 4 and 9 mph, and between pre-exercise and postexercise measurements at 4 mph, between the semirigid orthosis and the control condition at 4 and 9 mph, and between the lace-up brace and the control condition at 4 mph. Overall, the semirigid orthosis provided the most inversion restraint during dynamic loading, followed by the lace-up brace, tape, and control condition. We concluded that the lace-up brace and semirigid orthosis evaluated were very similar in restricting inversion, and that both devices limited postexercise inversion significantly more than ankle taping.

Full text

PDF
324

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bullard R. H., Dawson J., Arenson D. J. Taping the "athletic ankle". J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1979 Dec;69(12):727–734. doi: 10.7547/87507315-69-12-727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burdett R. G., Borello-France D., Blatchly C., Potter C. Gait comparison of subjects with hemiplegia walking unbraced, with ankle-foot orthosis, and with Air-Stirrup brace. Phys Ther. 1988 Aug;68(8):1197–1203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burks R. T., Bean B. G., Marcus R., Barker H. B. Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices. Am J Sports Med. 1991 Mar-Apr;19(2):104–106. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garrick J. G., Requa R. K. Role of external support in the prevention of ankle sprains. Med Sci Sports. 1973 Fall;5(3):200–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garrick J. G. The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1977 Nov-Dec;5(6):241–242. doi: 10.1177/036354657700500606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greene T. A., Hillman S. K. Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during, and after exercise. Am J Sports Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;18(5):498–506. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoshowsky V. M. Chronic lateral ligament instability of the ankle. Orthop Nurs. 1988 May-Jun;7(3):33–40. doi: 10.1097/00006416-198805000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Laughman R. K., Carr T. A., Chao E. Y., Youdas J. W., Sim F. H. Three-dimensional kinematics of the taped ankle before and after exercise. Am J Sports Med. 1980 Nov-Dec;8(6):425–431. doi: 10.1177/036354658000800608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Myburgh K. H., Vaughan C. L., Isaacs S. K. The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match. Am J Sports Med. 1984 Nov-Dec;12(6):441–446. doi: 10.1177/036354658401200607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pope M. H., Renstrom P., Donnermeyer D., Morgenstern S. A comparison of ankle taping methods. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987 Apr;19(2):143–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. RARICK G. L., BIGLEY G., KARST R., MALINA R. M. The measurable support of the ankle joint by conventional methods of taping. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962 Sep;44-A:1183–1190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robinson J. R., Frederick E. C., Cooper L. B. Systematic ankle stabilization and the effect on performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986 Dec;18(6):625–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rovere G. D., Clarke T. J., Yates C. S., Burley K. Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1988 May-Jun;16(3):228–233. doi: 10.1177/036354658801600305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stover C. N. Air stirrup management of ankle injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med. 1980 Sep-Oct;8(5):360–365. doi: 10.1177/036354658000800513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vaes P., De Boeck H., Handelberg F., Opdecam P. Comparative radiologic study of the influence of ankle joint bandages on ankle stability. Am J Sports Med. 1985 Jan-Feb;13(1):46–50. doi: 10.1177/036354658501300108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilkerson G. B. Comparative biomechanical effects of the standard method of ankle taping and a taping method designed to enhance subtalar stability. Am J Sports Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(6):588–595. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Athletic Training are provided here courtesy of National Athletic Trainers Association

RESOURCES