Abstract
Therapeutic ultrasound is frequently employed as a deep heating rehabilitation modality. It is administered in one of three ways: a) ultrasound with no preceding treatment, b) ultrasound on preheated tissues, or c) ultrasound on precooled tissues. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of ultrasound treatments on the tissue temperature rise of precooled human gastrocnemius muscle. Sixteen male subjects had a 23-gauge hypodermic needle microprobe inserted 3 cm deep into the medial aspect of their anesthetized gastrocnemius muscles. Data were gathered on each subject for one of two randomly assigned treatments: a) ultrasound treatment on precooled tissue, or b) ultrasound with no preceding treatment. Each treatment consisted of ultrasound delivered topically at 1.5 watts/cm2 in a continuous mode for 10 minutes. Ultrasound was applied in an overlapping longitudinal motion at 4 cm/s, with temperature readings recorded at 30-second intervals. We discovered a difference between the two treatment methods [t(14) = 16.26, p < .0001]. Ultrasound alone increased tissue temperature an average of 2°C, whereas ultrasound preceded by 15 minutes of ice did not increase tissue temperature even to the original baseline level. We concluded that, at a depth of 3 cm, ultrasound alone provided a greater heating effect than ultrasound preceded by an ice treatment.
Full text
PDF


Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Draper D. O., Sunderland S., Kirkendall D. T., Ricard M. A comparison of temperature rise in human calf muscles following applications of underwater and topical gel ultrasound. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993 May;17(5):247–251. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1993.17.5.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffin J. E. Physiological effects of ultrasonic energy as it is used clinically. Phys Ther. 1966 Jan;46(1):18–26. doi: 10.1093/ptj/46.1.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KUITERT J. H., HARR E. T. Introduction to clinical application of ultrasound. Phys Ther Rev. 1955 Jan;35(1):19–25. doi: 10.1093/ptj/35.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kramer J. F. Ultrasound: evaluation of its mechanical and thermal effects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984 May;65(5):223–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehmann J. F., DeLateur B. J., Silverman D. R. Selective heating effects of ultrasound in human beings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1966 Jun;47(6):331–339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehmann J. F., DeLateur B. J., Warren C. G., Stonebridge J. S. Heating produced by ultrasound in bone and soft tissue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1967 Aug;48(8):397–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehmann J. F., Stonebridge J. B., deLateur B. J., Warren C. G., Halar E. Temperatures in human thighs after hot pack treatment followed by ultrasound. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978 Oct;59(10):472–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SCHWAN H. P., CARSTENSEN E. L. Advantages and limitations of ultrasonics in medicine. J Am Med Assoc. 1952 May 10;149(2):121–125. doi: 10.1001/jama.1952.02930190023006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]