Abstract
Globoid cell leukodystrophy (GLD) is a lysosomal storage disease caused by genetic deficiency of galactocerebrosidase (GALC) activity. Failure in catalyzing the degradation of its major substrate, galactocerebroside, in oligodendrocytes (OLs) and Schwann cells leads to death of these myelinating cells, progressive demyelination, and early demise of GLD patients. Transplantation of bone marrow cells and umbilical cord blood have been attempted as a means of enzyme replacement and have shown limited success. It remains unknown whether or how these therapies support survival of GALC-deficient OLs and myelin maintenance. We report that, upon transplantation, GALC-deficient OLs from the twitcher mouse, a model of GLD, achieved widespread myelination in the brain and spinal cord of the myelin-deficient shiverer mouse, which was preserved for the life of the host. GALC immunohistochemistry showed direct evidence for GALC transfer from the shiverer environment to the engrafted mutant OLs in vivo. These findings suggest that the mutant OLs can internalize exogenous GALC and maintain stable myelin, demonstrating that exogenous enzyme replacement will be a key strategy in the therapy of GLD.
Keywords: enzyme replacement, globoid cell leukodystrophy, myelination, transplantation, lysosomal storage disease
Globoid cell leukodystrophy (GLD, also called Krabbe's disease) (1) is a lysosomal storage disease caused by genetic deficiency of activity of a lysosomal enzyme galactocerebrosidase (GALC) that catalyzes the digestion of its major substrate galactocerebroside in myelinating oligodendrocytes (OLs) and Schwann cells (2). GLD is characterized pathologically by rapidly progressive demyelination of the CNS and peripheral nervous system (PNS) and accumulation of macrophages in the demyelinating lesions. The majority of GLD patients (infantile form) succumb to severe neurological symptoms in the first two years of life.
Homozygous twitcher (GALCtwi/twi; twi) mice (3) have a genetic defect in GALC activity (4, 5), show progressive demyelination and accumulation of macrophages in the CNS and PNS, and rarely survive >45 days. These similarities to GLD have enabled the mouse to serve as a bona fide model to explore the pathophysiology and therapy of GLD (6). It has recently been shown that twi OLs can internalize exogenous GALC in vitro, resulting in their phenotypic correction (7), raising the possibility that in vivo enzyme replacement could be used to treat GLD. However, it is essential to evaluate the effect of enzyme replacement on OL function in vivo, because in vitro correction cannot unequivocally determine the myelinating capacity of the cell or the longevity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether twi OLs form and maintain normal myelin when GALC is provided exogenously in the CNS. In search of a method of enzyme replacement in vivo, we transplanted twi mutant oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) into the brain and spinal cord of homozygous shiverer (shi) mice in which OLs do not form compact myelin sheaths because of a deletion in the myelin basic protein (MBP) gene (8). The shi mouse has previously been used as a host to study cell-transplantation-derived myelination by detecting MBP of donor origin (9, 10).
Here, we report that twi OLs can survive and maintain stable myelin in the shi environment, which provides the transplanted twi cells with the missing enzyme.
Materials and Methods
Mice. Colonies of shiverer (C3Fe.SWV-MBPshi/J) and twitcher (B6.CE-GALCtwi/J) mice (The Jackson Laboratory) and transgenic mice that express EGFP driven by the 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase (CNP) promoter (CNP-EGFP) (11) were maintained at the University of Wisconsin. Methods for animal husbandry, surgery, and killing in this study were approved by the University's Animal Care and Use Committee.
Cell Culture. See Supporting Materials and Methods, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site.
Transplantation. Oligospheres were dissociated into single OPCs by incubating them in 0.025% trypsin/1 mM EDTA followed by trituration using a fire-polished Pasteur pipette. Neonatal shi mice (postnatal day 0-1) of both sexes born to shi homozygous pairs were cryoanesthetized and received bilateral intracallosal injection (100,000 cells per 2 μl at each site) through a pulledglass needle. At 3 weeks, the same animals received laminectomy under isoflurane anesthesia and were injected with 50,000 cells per 1 μl in the dorsal column of the thoracolumbar spinal cord. Cells derived from oligospheres were used for transplantation between 1 and 2 months of culture, and eight different batches of culture used in this study produced the same results.
Histology and Morphometric Analyses. See Supporting Materials and Methods.
GALC Activities. See Supporting Materials and Methods.
Results
Mutant OPCs. OPCs were derived from primary oligosphere cultures of neonatal twi mice carrying the CNP-EGFP transgene as an oligodendroglial marker (see Fig. 6, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). The transplanted cells consisted of 95.1 ± 0.4% NG2+, 4.4 ± 1.3% GFAP+, and 26.4 ± 4.4% O4+ (mean ± SD of three separate experiments).
Transplantation into the Brain and Spinal Cord. At 4 months of age, 8 of 12 transplanted shi brains contained CNP-EGFP+ grafts extending at least 2.5 mm in the corpus callosum rostrocaudally. These mice also showed CNP-EGFP+ grafts in the spinal cord extending at least 2.5 mm along the dorsal column rostrocaudally. The remainder (n = 4) were not used for further analyses, because only sporadic and scattered CNP-EGFP+ cells were found in cryostat sections, and fewer CNP-EGFP+ cells were found near the injection site in the spinal cord.
Four months after intracallosal transplantation of twi/CNP-EGFP OPCs, the donor-derived OLs and their resulting myelin were found throughout the corpus callosum of shi mice and also in other white-matter tracts of the brain (Fig. 1). The hippocampal fimbria and the corpus callosum were predilection sites of migration and engraftment (Fig. 1 A-C). The grafts found in areas distant from the injection sites (Fig. 1 G and H) suggest that the transplanted twi/CNP-EGFP OPCs are capable of migration throughout the brain.
In the spinal cord, twi donor cells migrated widely in the white matter around the injection site (Fig. 2A). In four engrafted mice, twi OLs myelinated the white matter almost completely, as viewed in cross sections (Fig. 2B). Scattered donor OLs were also found in the gray matter, providing myelin sheaths around axonal projections. Compared with the extensive patchy demyelination in twi mice, twi/CNP-EGFP myelin was more evenly and densely distributed in the white matter, although it was less dense than the wild-type myelin (Fig. 2 B and C). There was no MBP immunoreactivity in the untransplanted shi spinal cord (Fig. 2C). Toluidine blue staining showed extensive myelination in all columns of the spinal cord (Fig. 2 D-G). Electron microscopy showed multiple myelin wrapping by twi OLs (Fig. 2H). twi/CNP-EGFP OLs myelinated 95.5% of shi axons (15.1 ± 1.9 myelinated axons and 0.7 ± 0.1 nonmyelinated axons per 100 μm2 in the ventral column at 4 months of age, mean ± SD). The donor myelin was significantly thinner than wild-type myelin (G ratios of 0.66 ± 0.10, n = 170 for the donor myelin versus 0.56 ± 0.07, n = 171 for wild-type myelin, mean ± SD; n denotes the number of axons scored from three animals; P < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test). However, this result does not appear to be due to twi mutation, because transplanted wild-type CNP-EGFP OLs myelinated shi axons in the same manner (see Fig. 7, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site).
Stability of the Graft. The persistence of scattered nonmyelinated axons in the transplanted shi spinal cord raised the possibility that twi OL death/demyelination could have taken place in parallel with myelination. Thus, we determined the frequency of donor-cell death by using TUNEL assay, because OLs die by apoptosis in both GLD patients (12) and twi mice (13). As expected, TUNEL+ cells were scattered throughout the spinal white matter of moribund twi mice at 45 days of age (Fig. 3 A and B). There were sporadic TUNEL+ apoptotic cells in the engrafted shi mice at 4 months of age (Fig. 3 C and D). However, the numbers of TUNEL+ cells in the graft and in the wild-type and untransplanted shi mice were negligible compared with the twi spinal cord (Fig. 3A). Unfortunately, natural death of shi mice at ≈4 months of age did not allow us to observe extended life span of the engrafted twi OLs beyond this point. However, the fact that few TUNEL+ twi OLs were present in the graft of 4-month-old shi mice (Fig. 3 C and D) suggests that the transplanted twi OLs could have lived and maintained myelin for a longer period. That these cells lived approximately three times longer than the life span of twi mice (40-45 days) suggests that the shi CNS environment corrected the phenotype of the mutant OLs.
Evidence for GALC Enzyme Transfer from the shi Environment to twi OLs. Our next objective was to determine whether the activity and protein expression of GALC were altered in the engrafted shi white matter and, more importantly, whether there was evidence for GALC transferred into the mutant OLs. Interestingly, the level of GALC activity in shi mice was significantly higher than normal (P < 0.0001, Fig. 4A). Bu et al. (14) have recently reported that the number of OLs in shi mice continuously increased up to 60 days of age as a result of NG2+ cell proliferation. We confirmed an increased number of shi OLs, even at 4 months of age (see Fig. 8, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). Hence, the elevation of GALC activity level in shi mice is, likely, a reflection of the proliferation of OLs. In shi mice transplanted with twi/CNP-EGFP OPCs, the level of enzyme activity in the transplant was less than in the shi host (P < 0.0001) but was slightly higher than normal (Fig. 4A). It appears that the GALC-deficient, myelination-competent twi OLs and the GALC-producing, myelin-deficient shi OLs balanced the levels of GALC activity to support enzyme correction in twi OLs.
In addition to the positive effect of twi/CNP-EGFP graft (i.e., building myelin in the myelin-deficient host), the transplantation surgery itself might have contributed to the reduction in the abnormally elevated GALC activity of shi mice, because the sham-operated group showed a moderate decrease (Fig. 4A, P < 0.0001, compared with shi mice). As the control experiment, we transplanted dead OPCs. Injecting vehicle without cells may not be sufficient as a control, because a considerable number of donor OPCs are expected to die immediately after transplantation.¶ A possible explanation for this sham-surgery-induced reduction in GALC activity is that the dead cell transplantation could cause tissue damage in the host through inflammation (15). Nevertheless, the twi/CNP-EGFP transplants normalized the GALC activity in shi mice, and the extent of this activity was significantly larger than the possibly deleterious reduction by the sham transplantation (P = 0.0012 between shi mice with twi OPC graft and shi mice with sham surgery).
To demonstrate localization of GALC in twi cells, we used an immunofluorescent, confocal-microscopy approach. GALC immunolabeling in the spinal white matter (Fig. 4B) paralleled the results of GALC activity (compare Fig. 4 A and C). In confocal microscopy, GALC immunolabeling in the graft was found mainly in the shi parenchyma, presumably in OLs; granular GALC immunoreactivity was localized in all twi/CNP-EGFP OLs examined (n = 40), indicating that the donor cells internalized the enzyme (Fig. 4D). In previous studies, twi sciatic nerve grafted into the sciatic nerve of normal or trembler mutant mice showed improved myelination in the graft (16, 17). The finding was indicative of GALC enzyme replacement in twi Schwann cells. However, no evidence was provided for localization of GALC in the mutant cells. Moreover, it is essential to know whether phenotypic correction by GALC replacement occurs in OLs that myelinate multiple CNS axons in a more complex manner with elaborate processes.
Cell fusion of the donor OPCs to shi host cells could account for the GALC localization in twi/CNP-EGFP OLs; such a phenomenon has been reported in more immature donor cells, such as hematopoietic stem cells (18), but has not been recognized in OPCs. It appears unlikely that this phenomenon has occurred in our study, because no cells with double nuclei were observed in DAPI-counterstained EGFP+ OLs in the graft (confirmed with 2,000 EGFP+ cells from the brain and spinal cord of three transplanted mice).
Activation of Microglia/Macrophages. Infiltration of numerous macrophages, often multinucleated and “globoid,” is a unique pathology in the demyelinating lesion of GLD and its animal models including twi mice. It has been postulated that undegraded galactocerebroside induces globoid-cell formation (19). Thus, it was important to determine whether macrophages accumulate in the twi/CNP-EGFP graft. Moribund twi mice (postnatal day 45) showed highly activated microglia and macrophages in the spinal white matter (Fig. 5A). Compared with resting microglia in wild type mice (Fig. 5B), microglia in shi mice were partially activated, with increased number and CD45 immunoreactivity (Fig. 5C). In the twi/CNP-EGFP graft of shi spinal cord 14 weeks after transplantation, microglia were sporadically further activated (Fig. 5D). However, no macrophage accumulation was observed. When wild-type CNP-EGFP OPCs were transplanted, the extent of microglial activation was similar to that of twi/CNP-EGFP OPCs, showing sporadic microglia with thick processes, increased cell volume, and CD45 immunoreactivity (see Fig. 9, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). Thus, this slight activation of microglia may relate to factors in transplantation instead of twi mutation per se (e.g., a mismatch of the major histocompatibility complex haplotype, EGFP antigenicity, and toxicity of EGFP).
Although the pathogenesis of GLD primarily lies in the lack of GALC activity, it is not known whether the macrophage accumulation plays an important role in OL death and progressive demyelination. In this study, the survival of twi OLs in the shi host could be due to the absence of macrophage accumulation and not to the enzyme replacement. Scaravilli and Suzuki (16) noted the absence of macrophage accumulation in the twi sciatic nerve grafted in normal mice but did not exclude the possibility that twi Schwann cells survived in the host because of the lack of macrophage accumulation. Recently we have created macrophage-deficient twi mice by crossing the twi mouse with a mutant mouse deficient in macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (20). We confirmed that this double mutant had no macrophage accumulation in the CNS white matter yet showed demyelination comparable with or even more severe than that in control twi mice.∥ Thus, the absence of macrophage accumulation (Fig. 5D) is not a likely explanation for why engrafted twi OLs maintained stable myelin in shi mice.
Discussion
In both GLD and its animal counterpart, the twi mouse, myelination of both the CNS and PNS begins normally, yet, shortly after its formation, myelin is lost through progressive demyelination. Thus, both OLs and Schwann cells have the initial capacity to synthesize normal myelin in these disorders, albeit in reduced amounts (21, 22), raising the question whether they could be protected from ensuing death and myelin loss. Here, we show that replacement of GALC enabled twi OLs to maintain stable and widespread myelin throughout the CNS, when these cells were transplanted into another mutant background. The shi mouse serendipitously provides advantages to twi cells as the increase in OLs and their progenitors in shi mice (14), even in the face of their persistent failure to myelinate axons, provides an extraneous source of GALC that the transplanted twi cells can use.
The mechanism of GALC transfer into the mutant OLs is yet to be determined. The mannose-6-phosphate receptors (MPRs) cycle among the Golgi, endosomes, and the plasma membrane, internalizing exogenous lysosomal enzymes and mediating transport of acid hydrolases to lysosome (reviewed in ref. 23). In the CNS, immunohistochemical localization of MPRs is found mostly in neurons (24, 25). Because OLs are also reported to express MPRs, perhaps to a lesser extent (26), the cells are likely to internalize GALC through MPRs. However, MPR-mediated internalization of GALC into cultured twi OLs is only partially blocked by the addition of mannose-6-phosphate (7), suggesting other mechanisms of GALC internalization, such as direct pinocytosis. As to the source of exogenous GALC in this study, shi OLs may secrete the enzyme by certain means. The diffuse GALC immunoreactivity, in addition to the strong intracellular labeling in the white matter of shi spinal cord (Fig. 4B), may indicate the presence of secreted GALC in the neuropil. In addition, direct cell-to-cell transfer of lysosomal enzyme independent of MPRs could be possible, because it occurs between lymphocytes and fibroblasts (27), although the phenomenon is enzyme-specific (28) and has not been tested for GALC or for OL-to-OL.
twi OLs survived for up to 4 months after transplantation in the shi recipient, suggesting that longevity of these cells is achievable. In this study, the transplanted mutant OPCs were capable of developing into mature OLs in the presence of GALC in the environment, and they maintained stable myelin for the long term. It has been reported that a substantial number of OLs appear to be newly formed in parallel with their death in the spinal white matter of twi mice (29). Thus, the mechanism of GALC-replacement therapy in GLD would be to cease this turnover of OLs and enable myelin maintenance and repair by supporting the survival of OLs derived from endogenous OPCs.
GALC replacement in GLD might seem an obvious therapy, yet it faces at least two important challenges. First, enzyme replacement to protect the myelinating cells must take place very early in life, because children with the classical infantile form of the disease develop disability within the first few months of life and rarely survive beyond two years. To date, only early bone marrow (30) and umbilical cord blood transplantation (31) have been shown to have any beneficial effect in GLD. The mechanism by which these therapies improve function is not clear, although it has been postulated that GALC is supplied to mutant OLs and Schwann cells by donor-derived microglia/macrophages (32). Direct evidence for this mechanism, however, is lacking. Regrettably, these therapies have minimal effects on the symptomatic patients with infantile GLD, who represent the majority of the cases, probably because the levels of GALC activity in the CNS provided by the donor cells are not sufficient to reverse rapid progression of the disease. The second major challenge to enzyme replacement in GLD is that GALC must be supplied to the entire nervous system as both the CNS and PNS are severely affected. Preservation or remyelination of the CNS might prolong survival and quality of life, but demyelination of the PNS is responsible for severe disability. Recently, intracerebroventricular or intracranial injections of an adenoassociated virus encoding the GALC gene in neonatal twi mice resulted in high levels of GALC activity in the brain, leading to moderate improvement in neurological symptoms and life span (33). Interestingly, neuronal cells were most efficiently transduced with the GALC gene. It is not clear whether the virus also infected OLs to a lesser extent or the transduced neurons secondarily delivered GALC to OLs. Our study supports the idea that the mutant OLs can survive and maintain myelin solely by exogenous GALC in vivo. Eventual death of the animals, however, emphasizes that therapies targeting focal areas of the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerve through gene therapy or cell transplantation have critical limitations for complete cure of the disease.
To overcome the difficulties described above, rapid and systemic delivery of GALC is crucial. Our results of enzyme transfer in vivo strongly support efforts to deliver the exogenous enzyme by the systemic administration of recombinant GALC (34); i.p. GALC injection appeared to improve the demyelinating pathology of PNS in twi mice but had little effect on the CNS. Perhaps a sufficient level of GALC activity was not achieved in the CNS, leaving a question whether the strategy of exogenous enzyme transfer is effective in OLs in the CNS. Our present study clearly shows that the mutant OLs can survive and maintain central myelin for the long term when a sufficient amount of GALC is provided. Thus, whether the enzyme can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a key factor for success. In fact, enzyme-replacement therapy has been performed successfully in some lysosomal storage diseases, such as type I Gaucher disease, Fabry disease, and mucopolysaccharidosis I, in which somatic organs are mainly affected (35). However, poor transfer of enzymes to CNS target cells across the BBB has made it difficult to apply this approach to neurodegenerative lysosomal storage diseases (36). Indeed, Urayama et al. (37) have recently demonstrated that MPR-mediated transport of β-glucuronidase from blood to brain parenchyma occurs only in early postnatal life and is down-regulated by 7 weeks of age in mice. This limitation, however, could be overcome by high doses of enzyme and a long-term treatment (38). Another approach to deliver GALC would be transplantation of GALC-producing (ideally-secreting) cells that have been transduced with the GALC gene. Blood-borne macrophages and microglia may be among the best candidates, because they have the potential to cross the BBB and populate widely in the CNS and PNS (39). Development of such methods for enzyme delivery will benefit GLD and, potentially, other lysosomal storage diseases with severe CNS pathologies, such as Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff disease.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. I. R. Griffiths for critically reviewing the manuscript and E. Merrill, D. Majewski, A. Gossens, S. Yang, P. Halfmann, and C. Lavin for technical assistance. This work was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant R21NS048238 (to V.G.), NIH Mental Retardation/Developmental Disabilities Research Center Grant P30HD40677 (to V.G.), the European Leukodystrophy Association (V.G.), and the Hunter's Hope Foundation.
Author contributions: Y.K. and I.D.D. designed research; Y.K. and V.G. performed research; Y.K. and D.A.W. analyzed data; and Y.K. wrote the paper.
Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
Abbreviations: CNP, 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase; GALC, galactocerebrosidase; GLD, globoid cell leukodystrophy; MBP, myelin basic protein; OL, oligodendrocyte; OPC, oligodendrocyte progenitor cell; PNS, peripheral nervous system; shi, homozygous shiverer; twi, homozygous twitcher.
Footnotes
Zhang, S. C., Wagner, D. & Duncan, I. D., 29th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Oct. 23-28, 1999, Miami Beach, FL (abstr.).
Kondo, Y. & Duncan, I. D., 34th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Oct. 23-27, 2004, San Diego (abstr.).
References
- 1.Wenger, D. A., Suzuki, K., Suzuki, Y. & Suzuki, K. (2001) in The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, eds. Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W. S., Valle, D., Childs, B., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 3669-3694.
- 2.Suzuki, K. & Suzuki, Y. (1970) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 66, 302-309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Duchen, L. W., Eicher, E. M., Jacobs, J. M., Scaravilli, F. & Teixeira, F. (1980) Brain 103, 695-710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kobayashi, T., Yamanaka, T., Jacobs, J. M., Teixeira, F. & Suzuki, K. (1980) Brain Res. 202, 479-483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sakai, N., Inui, K., Tatsumi, N., Fukushima, H., Nishigaki, T., Taniike, M., Nishimoto, J., Tsukamoto, H., Yanagihara, I., Ozono, K., et al. (1996) J. Neurochem. 66, 1118-1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Suzuki, K. & Suzuki, K. (1995) Brain Pathol. 5, 249-258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luddi, A., Volterrani, M., Strazza, M., Smorlesi, A., Rafi, M. A., Datto, J., Wenger, D. A. & Costantino-Ceccarini, E. (2001) Neurobiol. Dis. 8, 600-610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roach, A., Takahashi, N., Pravtcheva, D., Ruddle, F. & Hood, L. (1985) Cell 42, 149-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Windrem, M. S., Nunes, M. C., Rashbaum, W. K., Schwartz, T. H., Goodman, R. A., McKhann, G., Roy, N. S. & Goldman, S. A. (2004) Nat. Med. 10, 93-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mitome, M., Low, H. P., van den, P. A., Nunnari, J. J., Wolf, M. K., Billings-Gagliardi, S. & Schwartz, W. J. (2001) Brain 124, 2147-2161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yuan, X., Chittajallu, R., Belachew, S., Anderson, S., McBain, C. J. & Gallo, V. (2002) J. Neurosci. Res. 70, 529-545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jatana, M., Giri, S. & Singh, A. K. (2002) Neurosci. Lett. 330, 183-187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Taniike, M., Mohri, I., Eguchi, N., Irikura, D., Urade, Y., Okada, S. & Suzuki, K. (1999) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 58, 644-653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bu, J., Banki, A., Wu, Q. & Nishiyama, A. (2004) Glia 48, 51-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Modo, M., Stroemer, R. P., Tang, E., Patel, S. & Hodges, H. (2003) NeuroReport 14, 39-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Scaravilli, F. & Suzuki, K. (1983) Nature 305, 713-715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Scaravilli, F. & Jacobs, J. M. (1982) Brain Res. 237, 163-172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yagi, T., Matsuda, J., Tominaga, K., Suzuki, K. & Suzuki, K. (2005) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 64, 565-575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Austin, J. H. & Lehfeldt, D. (1965) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 24, 265-289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yoshida, H., Hayashi, S., Kunisada, T., Ogawa, M., Nishikawa, S., Okamura, H., Sudo, T., Shultz, L. D. & Nishikawa, S. (1990) Nature 345, 442-444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tanaka, K., Nagara, H., Kobayashi, T. & Goto, I. (1988) Brain Res. 454, 340-346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nagara, H., Kobayashi, T., Suzuki, K. & Suzuki, K. (1982) Brain Res. 244, 289-294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kornfeld, S. (1992) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 307-330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Konishi, Y., Fushimi, S. & Shirabe, T. (2005) Neurosci. Lett. 378, 7-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hawkes, C. & Kar, S. (2002) Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 33-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schluff, P., Flott-Rahmel, B., Gieselmann, V., Zimmer, P., Das, A. & Ullrich, K. (1998) J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 21, 313-317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Olsen, I., Dean, M. F., Harris, G. & Muir, H. (1981) Nature 291, 244-247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Olsen, I., Muir, H., Smith, R., Fensom, A. & Watt, D. J. (1983) Nature 306, 75-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Taniike, M. & Suzuki, K. (1995) J. Neurosci. Res. 40, 325-332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Krivit, W., Shapiro, E. G., Peters, C., Wagner, J. E., Cornu, G., Kurtzberg, J., Wenger, D. A., Kolodny, E. H., Vanier, M. T., Loes, D. J., et al (1998) N. Engl. J. Med. 338, 1119-1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Escolar, M. L., Poe, M. D., Provenzale, J. M., Richards, K. C., Allison, J., Wood, S., Wenger, D. A., Pietryga, D., Wall, D., Champagne, M., et al (2005) N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 2069-2081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Krivit, W., Lockman, L. A., Watkins, P. A., Hirsch, J. & Shapiro, E. G. (1995) J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 18, 398-412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rafi, M. A., Zhi Rao, H., Passini, M. A., Curtis, M., Vanier, M. T., Zaka, M., Luzi, P., Wolfe, J. H. & Wenger, D. A. (2005) Mol. Ther. 11, 734-744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lee, W. C., Courtenay, A., Troendle, F. J., Stallings-Mann, M. L., Dickey, C. A., DeLucia, M. W., Dickson, D. W. & Eckman, C. B. (2005) FASEB J. 19, 1549-1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Desnick, R. J. (2004) J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 27, 385-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.von Specht, B. U., Geiger, B., Arnon, R., Passwell, J., Keren, G., Goldman, B. & Padeh, B. (1979) Neurology 29, 848-854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Urayama, A., Grubb, J. H., Sly, W. S. & Banks, W. A. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12658-12663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vogler, C., Levy, B., Grubb, J. H., Galvin, N., Tan, Y., Kakkis, E., Pavloff, N. & Sly, W. S. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14777-14782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Imai, F., Sawada, M., Suzuki, H., Kiya, N., Hayakawa, M., Nagatsu, T., Marunouchi, T. & Kanno, T. (1997) Neurosci. Lett. 237, 49-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.