1. Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide, and its prevalence is projected to triple by 2050, posing a substantial societal and economic burden (1–3). The pathological hallmarks of AD include the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques, neurofibrillary tangles of hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau), and a persistent state of neuroinflammation (4–8). While recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of anti-Aβ immunotherapies such as Lecanemab and Donanemab represent a pivotal advancement (9), their effects are modest and primarily target a single aspect of the disease cascade. It is well-established that Aβ aggregates elevate intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative damage and establishing a vicious cycle that further reinforces Aβ aggregation and oxidative stress (10). Simultaneously, Aβ activates glial cells, triggering neuroinflammation marked by elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), which in turn exacerbate Aβ dyshomeostasis and synaptic impairment (11–13). The synergistic interplay between oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, perpetuated by Aβ, accelerates disease progression, highlighting the pressing need for therapeutic interventions that can concurrently address multiple pathological pathways, including Aβ dysmetabolism, oxidative stress, and chronic neuroinflammation.
In this context, microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as attractive candidates due to their ability to precisely regulate complex gene networks (14–16). The recent identification of a novel miRNA, miR-32533, and its intricate involvement in AD pathogenesis through the cyclic-AMP response binding protein 5 (CREB5) axis presents a fresh avenue for investigation (16). In this opinion article, we critically evaluate these discoveries, highlight their immunological implications, and discuss the translational potential of targeting this axis for AD diagnosis and therapy.
2. miR-32533: a novel multifunctional therapeutic target for AD
The study by our group provides robust evidence that establishes miR-32533 as a central regulator in AD (16–19). Its identification by RNA sequencing in amyloid precursor protein (APP)/Presenilin-1 dE9 (PS1) mouse brains and rigorously validated as a canonical Drosha/Dicer product via northern blot, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Several critical characteristics make it a promising therapeutic candidate:
2.1. miR-32533 is brain-enriched and early dysregulated in AD
The expression of miR-32533, enriched in the cortex and hippocampus, is significantly reduced in AD models, exemplified by APP/PS1 and 5×familial AD (5×FAD) mice, and APPswe cells (16). This downregulation is also observed in the plasma of AD patients (16). The nadir of its expression at 5 months in mice suggests it may be an early event in the disease progression, making it a potential biomarker for early detection.
2.2. miR-32533 levels correlate with clinical parameters
The positive correlation between plasma miR-32533 levels and minimum mental state examination (MMSE) scores in AD patients, along with its significant diagnostic value (Area Under Curve (AUC)=0.737), featuring 53.8% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity, strengthens its clinical importance. Intriguingly, its association with the Aβ1-42/Aβ1–40 ratio, but not with tau phosphorylation at threonine 217 (p-Tau217), places it within the amyloid pathology cascade (16).
2.3. miR-32533 overexpression exhibits pleiotropic neuroprotective effects
Functionally, overexpression of miR-32533 has demonstrated a remarkable capacity to alleviate Aβ-induced neurotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo. It improves neuronal viability, reduces oxidative stress by decreasing ROS and malondialdehyde (MDA) while increasing glutathione (GSH) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), and inhibits mitochondrial apoptosis (16). Mechanically, miR-32533 overexpression elevates the ratio of anti-apoptotic markers, reduces cytochrome c expression, and decreases the cleaved cysteinyl aspartate-specific proteinase-3 (caspase-3) to caspase-3 ratio (16). Notably, miR-32533 overexpression also significantly suppresses the release of key pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, demonstrating its immunomodulatory capacity (16). Conversely, all these protective effects are reversed upon suppression of miR-32533 expression (16). Given the established role of microRNAs in synaptic plasticity (20), miR-32533 is a putative regulator of this process. The multi-faceted nature of the protective effects of miR-32533 is exactly what is desirable for a complex disease like AD.
3. The miR-32533/CREB5 axis: a novel regulator of AD pathogenesis and neuroinflammation
The most significant mechanistic insight from our study is the elucidation of CREB5 as a direct and functional target of miR-32533 (16). This axis represents a master regulatory switch for Aβ metabolism and its downstream consequences (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Role of miR-32533/CREB5 in AD pathology. AD, alzheimer’s disease; CREB5, cyclic-AMP response binding protein 5; Aβ, amyloid-beta; ADAM10, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10; PS1, presenilin-1; APP, amyloid precursor protein; BACE1, beta-site cleaving enzyme 1; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha. (Created using BioRender.com).
3.1. CREB5 is directly targeted for transcriptional regulation
Our research reveals that miR-32533 binds to the 3’ untranslated region (3’-UTR) region of CREB5 mRNA, thereby repressing its expression. Our multi-omics approach revealed CREB5 as the only predicted miR-32533 target gene showing significant upregulation in two distinct AD mouse models (5×FAD, p = 0.022; APP/PS1, p = 0.038) (16). Our results are reinforced by Tian et al., who identified CREB5 as a factor critically associated with neurodegenerative disease and aging (21). CREB5 acts as a transcriptional hub, shifting amyloid processing by directly repressing a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10) and activating beta-site cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1)/PS1 through promoter binding (16). This dual action elegantly explains how miR-32533 downregulation leads to Aβ overproduction.
3.2. The miR-32533/CREB5 axis is specifically associated with amyloid pathology
Aβ deposition, as the initiating factor in AD, promotes aging-associated DNA damage (22). The association of CREB5 with brain atrophy and Aβ accumulation reinforces our findings (23). Notably, in the tested AD models, the miR-32533/CREB5 axis exerted a significant effect on Aβ-related pathologies but had no remarkable effect on tau phosphorylation. Our findings indicate that the miR-32533/CREB5 axis attenuates Aβ1–42 generation through the coordinated regulation of ADAM10 and BACE1/PS1. Cognitive deficits and elevated Aβ levels in AD models were linked to the dysregulation of this axis, whereas tau pathology remained unaffected (16). This specificity suggests a primary role in the amyloid cascade, potentially rendering it most relevant for early-stage AD or as a combination therapy with tau-targeting agents in the later disease stages.
3.3. The miR-32533/CREB5 axis is a bridge of amyloid pathology and neuroinflammation
Beyond Aβ regulation, the miR-32533/CREB5 axis is critically involved in neuroinflammation. Our study shows that modulation of this axis directly affects the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α. Although initially studied in oncology (24, 25), CREB5 is increasingly implicated in neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, where its expression is significantly elevated (16, 26, 27). As a disease node, suppressing CREB5 could inhibit tumorigenesis (24), while upregulation of CREB5 counteracts the anti-apoptotic activity in Parkinson’s disease models (28). The involvement of CREB5 in apoptosis and inflammation is exemplified in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury, where the CREB5/NF-κB axis serves as a crucial downstream effector of FOXQ1 (29). Given that CREB5 has been involved in the TNF signaling pathway in other contexts (29, 30), its upregulation in AD likely exacerbates the chronic neuroinflammatory response.
By repressing CREB5, miR-32533 can concurrently reduce Aβ production and mitigate neuroinflammation, disrupting the detrimental cycle between Aβ accumulation and glial activation. Inhibition of miR-32533 leads to CREB5 upregulation, leading to ROS-driven oxidative stress, apoptosis (decreased B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2)/Bcl2-association X protein (Bax) ratio and increased cytochrome c expression), and elevates pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) (16). CREB5 overexpression reverses these protective effects, increasing ROS and MDA, decreasing GSH and SOD activity, and increasing neuroinflammation (16). Supporting this, miR-769-5p protects against AD by targeting CREB5 to alleviate oxidative stress (31), and CREB5 modulates neuroinflammation and cognition in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) encephalitis (32). Collectively, the miR-32533/CREB5 axis connects amyloidosis and immunopathology in AD.
4. Targeting miR-32533: a strategic approach for AD therapy
Accumulating preclinical studies indicate that dysregulated miRNA expression in AD patients, especially in plasma, brain tissues, and synaptic regions, contributes to cognitive impairments (33–35). Regarding discoveries of the miR-32533/CREB5 axis, two primary therapeutic strategies can be employed: restoring miR-32533 function or inhibiting CREB5 activity.
The utilization of advanced, brain-penetrant delivery systems, such as optimized adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors, exosomes and nanoparticles (36–42), to administer miR-32533 mimics constitutes a direct gene therapy approach. In vivo studies using AAV-loaded mimics in APP/PS1 mice have shown promising results, demonstrating restored cognitive function, reduced Aβ burden, and mitigated neuroinflammation (16–19). The primary challenge lies in ensuring efficient, safe, and long-lasting delivery to the central nervous system (CNS).
An alternative strategy involves developing small-molecule inhibitors capable of disrupting the transcriptional activity of CREB5, especially its binding to the BACE1 and PS1 promoters. This approach could replicate the benefits of miR-32533 upregulation, while avoiding the delivery difficulties associated with oligonucleotides. High-throughput screening and structure-based drug design could be utilized to identify these compounds (43–48).
Given the immunomodulatory effects of this axis, a combined treatment using a miR-32533-based agent alongside passive anti-Aβ immunotherapy might exhibit synergistic effects. While immunotherapy eliminates existing plaques, restoring miR-32533 could reduce the formation of new Aβ plaques and, at the same time, mitigate the associated neuroinflammatory response, potentially leading to enhanced clinical effectiveness.
5. Discussion and future perspectives
Our research group identified miR-32533, a 23-nucleotide miRNA with negligible coding capacity, presenting a promising diagnostic candidate. The assessment of its aberrant expression using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves shows significant predictive value for AD, supporting its potential as a non-invasive biomarker. Furthermore, our findings reveal a tight regulatory relationship between miR-32533 and its direct target, CREB5, indicating that the miR-32533/CREB5 axis is a critical regulator of Aβ metabolism, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammatory responses. To strengthen our findings, subsequent studies will employ the physiologically relevant brain organoid model (49). Moreover, to apply miR-32533/CREB5 axis clinically, several questions remain to be addressed.
First, it is essential to conduct large-scale longitudinal studies on human cohorts to confirm the diagnostic and prognostic significance of plasma miR-32533. Given that miR-32533 likely targets other molecules besides CREB5, a comprehensive identification of its entire target network using techniques such as Argonaute CrossLinking ImmunoPrecipitation followed by sequencing (AGO-CLIP-seq) will provide systems-level insight into its function and uncover potential off-target effects and additional synergistic pathways (50–52).
Second, although the present study did not identify a connection to tau, it is of utmost importance to explore this aspect in alternative models, particularly those with robust tauopathy. The interaction among Aβ, inflammation, and tau is central to AD, and understanding whether and how this axis impacts tau pathogenesis in the later stages of the disease is crucial (53–55).
Third, the primary obstacle to any CNS-targeting miRNA therapy is its delivery (56–58). It is paramount to invest in the development of novel, cell-type-specific delivery platforms. Moreover, comprehensive toxicology studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term safety of chronically modulating this axis, considering the potential roles of CREB5 in other tissues and processes.
6. Final considerations
In conclusion, the identification of the miR-32533/CREB5 pathway unveils a previously unknown regulatory mechanism in AD pathogenesis, uniquely linking Aβ metabolism with neuroinflammation. Its capability to coordinately modulate multiple aspects of AD pathology, ranging from secretase balance to oxidative stress and cytokine release, renders it an exceptionally promising therapeutic target. Looking ahead, it will be imperative to make a concerted effort to integrate rigorous basic scientific research with thorough mapping of the miR-32533 regulatory network, alongside the development of innovative bioengineering delivery methodologies. By focusing on this endogenous regulatory pathway, we might develop the next wave of multi-target, disease-modifying therapies for AD, which not only clear pathological proteins but also alleviate the destructive inflammatory environment in the brain.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82473904) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Peking Union Medical College (3332025074 and 3332025161).
Footnotes
Edited by: Ulises Gomez-Pinedo, Health Research Institute of Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Spain
Reviewed by: Alejandro A Canales-Aguirre, CONACYT Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco (CIATEJ), Mexico
Ghada Elsayed, National Research Centre, Egypt
Author contributions
LL: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Visualization, Writing – original draft. LZ: Visualization, Writing – original draft. ZL: Visualization, Writing – original draft. KZ: Visualization, Writing – original draft. ZC: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. RL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author RL declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1. Chen S, Cao Z, Nandi A, Counts N, Jiao L, Prettner K, et al. The global macroeconomic burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: estimates and projections for 152 countries or territories. Lancet Global Health. (2024) 12:e1534–43. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00264-X. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Livingston G, Huntley J, Liu KY, Costafreda SG, Selbæk G, Alladi S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission. Lancet. (2024) 404:572–628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01296-0. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rey-Picazo J, Pita J, Peña L, Ferraz-Torres M, Martínez-García O, Ávila-Villanueva M, et al. Potential risk to brain health after surgical interventions: biomarkers to predict the occurrence of cognitive decline. Aging Dis. (2025) 17(6):1–14. doi: 10.14336/AD.2025.1105. PMID: . Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Karran E, De Strooper B. The amyloid hypothesis in Alzheimer disease: new insights from new therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2022) 21:306–18. doi: 10.1038/s41573-022-00391-w. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Starling S. Blood-derived Aβ induces AD pathology. Nat Rev Neurol. (2017) 14:2. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.164. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sierksma A, Lu A, Salta E, Vanden Eynden E, Callaerts-Vegh Z, D’Hooge R, et al. Deregulation of neuronal miRNAs induced by amyloid-β or TAU pathology. Mol Neurodegener. (2018) 13:54. doi: 10.1186/s13024-018-0285-1. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. LaFerla FM, Green KN, Oddo S. Intracellular amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2007) 8:499–509. doi: 10.1038/nrn2168. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rahman MM, Lendel C. Extracellular protein components of amyloid plaques and their roles in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Mol Neurodegener. (2021) 16:59. doi: 10.1186/s13024-021-00465-0. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jucker M, Walker LC. Alzheimer’s disease: From immunotherapy to immunoprevention. Cell. (2023) 186:4260–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.021. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Xing H, Sun X, Xing L, Li Q, Puyang M, Liu L, et al. ROS-responsive ecdysterone nanodelivery system ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease via synergistic modulation of oxidative stress and amyloid-β deposition. Chem Eng J. (2025) 522:167717. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.167717. PMID: 38826717 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Li JJ, Wang B, Kodali MC, Chen C, Kim E, Patters BJ, et al. In vivo evidence for the contribution of peripheral circulating inflammatory exosomes to neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflamm. (2018) 15:8. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-1038-8. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gao C, Jiang J, Tan Y, Chen S. Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Signal Transduction Targeted Ther. (2023) 8:359. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01588-0. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ding B, Lin C, Liu Q, He Y, Ruganzu JB, Jin H, et al. Tanshinone IIA attenuates neuroinflammation via inhibiting RAGE/NF-κB signaling pathway in vivo and in vitro. J Neuroinflamm. (2020) 17:302. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01981-4. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wu X, Xia P, Yang L, Lu C, Lu Z. The roles of long non-coding RNAs in Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis, treatment, and their involvement in Alzheimer’s disease immune responses. Non-coding RNA Res. (2024) 9:659–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2024.03.008. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Li Y-B, Fu Q, Guo M, Du Y, Chen Y, Cheng Y. MicroRNAs: pioneering regulators in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Transl Psychiatry. (2024) 14:367. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03075-8. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zeng L, Cai Z, Liu J, Zhao K, Liang F, Sun T, et al. miR‐32533 reduces cognitive impairment and amyloid‐β overload by targeting CREB5‐mediated signaling pathways in Alzheimer’s disease. Adv Sci. (2025) 12:e2409986. doi: 10.1002/advs.202409986. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Liu R, Li Z, Zeng L, Zhao K, Cai Z. Biomarker miR-32533 for cognitive impairment-related diseases and use thereof (2024). WO2024037389 Available online at: https://patentscope2.wipo.int/search/zh/detail.jsf?docId=WO2024037389 (Accessed April 25,2026).
- 18. Liu R, Li Z, Zeng L, Zhao K, Cai Z. Biomarker miR-32533 for cognitive impairment-related diseases and use thereof (2025). US20250171851 Available online at: https://patentscope2.wipo.int/search/zh/detail.jsf?docId=US456990204 (Accessed April 25,2026).
- 19. Liu R, Li Z, Zeng L, Zhao K. Biomarker miR-32533 for cognitive disorder related diseases and application of biomarker miR-32533 (2022). CN115927583 Available online at: https://patentscope2.wipo.int/search/zh/detail.jsf?docId=CN395772485 (Accessed April 25,2026).
- 20. Reza-Zaldivar EE, Hernández-Sápiens MA, Minjarez B, Gómez-Pinedo U, Sánchez-González VJ, Márquez-Aguirre AL, et al. Dendritic spine and synaptic plasticity in Alzheimer’s disease: a focus on microRNA. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2020) 8:255. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00255. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Tian X, Zhao Z, Zhao J, Su D, He B, Shi C, et al. Transcriptomic analysis to identify genes associated with hypothalamus vulnerability in aging mice with cognitive decline. Behav Brain Res. (2024) 465:114943. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.114943. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Xu Y, Hong D, Gomez-Pinedo U, Liu J, Xu J. Editorial: Current advances in genetic dementia and aging. Front Aging Neurosci. (2022) 14:1020547. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1020547. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nho K, Nudelman K, Allen M, Hodges A, Kim S, Risacher SL, et al. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis identifies novel dysregulated genes implicated in Alzheimer’s pathology. Alzheimer’s Dementia: J Alzheimer’s Assoc. (2020) 16:1213–23. doi: 10.1002/alz.12092. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhou W, Xu C, Yang S, Li H, Pan C, Jiang Z, et al. An oncohistone-driven H3.3K27M/CREB5/ID1 axis maintains the stemness and Malignancy of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:3675. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58795-2. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Wang A, Yan S, Liu J, Chen X, Hu M, Du X, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-related super enhancer promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in hepatocellular carcinoma through CREB5 mediated activation of TNC. Cell Death Dis. (2025) 16:73. doi: 10.1038/s41419-025-07356-y. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, Chételat G, Holtzman DM, Hyman BT, et al. Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2021) 7:33. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00269-y. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zhang C-H, Gao Y, Hung H-H, Zhuo Z, Grodzinsky AJ, Lassar AB. Creb5 coordinates synovial joint formation with the genesis of articular cartilage. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:7295. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35010-0. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang R, Tong S, Wang M, Zou J, Wang N, Sun F, et al. CREB5 hypermethylation involved in the ganglioside GM1 therapy of Parkinson’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. (2023) 15:1122647. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1122647. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhao Q, Zhang R, Wang Y, Li T, Xue J, Chen Z. FOXQ1, deubiquitinated by USP10, alleviates sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by targeting the CREB5/NF-κB signaling axis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. (2024) 1870:167331. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167331. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Canive M, Badia-Bringué G, Vázquez P, Garrido JM, Juste RA, Fernandez A, et al. A genome-wide association study for tolerance to paratuberculosis identifies candidate genes involved in DNA packaging, DNA damage repair, innate immunity, and pathogen persistence. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:820965. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.820965. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Ma P, Cui H, Ren L, Liu Y, Cen M. miR-769-5p as a novel biomarker and functional mediator in Alzheimer’s disease: targeting CREB5 to alleviate oxidative injury. APMIS: Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Immunologica Scandinavica. (2026) 134:e70148. doi: 10.1111/apm.70148. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wang L, Huang J, Jiang M. CREB5 computational regulation network construction and analysis between frontal cortex of HIV encephalitis (HIVE) and HIVE-control patients. Cell Biochem Biophys. (2011) 60:199–207. doi: 10.1007/s12013-010-9140-x. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Patrick E, Rajagopal S, Wong H-K, McCabe C, Xu J, Tang A, et al. Dissecting the role of non-coding RNAs in the accumulation of amyloid and tau neuropathologies in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. (2017) 12:51. doi: 10.1186/s13024-017-0191-y. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Chen G, Li H, Shao X, Wang DJJ, Hu W, Han Y, et al. Decreased water exchange rate across the blood–brain barrier throughout the Alzheimer’s disease continuum: evidence from Chinese data. Alzheimer’s Dementia. (2025) 21:e70089. doi: 10.1002/alz.70089. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Song C, Li S, Mai Y, Li L, Dai G, Zhou Y, et al. Dysregulated expression of miR-140 and miR-122 compromised microglial chemotaxis and led to reduced restriction of AD pathology. J Neuroinflamm. (2024) 21:167. doi: 10.1186/s12974-024-03162-z. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Yin Z, Herron S, Silveira S, Kleemann K, Gauthier C, Mallah D, et al. Identification of a protective microglial state mediated by miR-155 and interferon-γ signaling in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci. (2023) 26:1196–207. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01355-y. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ouyang Q, Liu K, Zhu Q, Deng H, Le Y, Ouyang W, et al. Brain-penetration and neuron-targeting DNA nanoflowers co-delivering miR-124 and rutin for synergistic therapy of Alzheimer’s disease. Small (Weinheim der Bergstrasse Germany). (2022) 18:e2107534. doi: 10.1002/smll.202107534. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ojeda-Hernández DD, Hernández-Sapiéns MA, Reza-Zaldívar EE, Canales-Aguirre A, Matías-Guiu JA, Matías-Guiu J, et al. Exosomes and biomaterials: in search of a new therapeutic strategy for multiple sclerosis. Life (Basel Switzerland). (2022) 12:1417. doi: 10.3390/life12091417. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ojeda-Hernández DD, Velasco-Lozano S, Fraile JM, Mateos-Díaz JC, Rojo FJ, Benito-Martín MS, et al. Thermosensitive chitosan-based hydrogel: a vehicle for overcoming the limitations of nose-to-brain cell therapy. Acta Biomater. (2024) 188:157–68. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.002. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Gao J, Gunasekar S, Xia ZJ, Shalin K, Jiang C, Chen H, et al. Gene therapy for CNS disorders: modalities, delivery and translational challenges. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2024) 25:553–72. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00829-7. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ojeda-Hernández DD, Canales-Aguirre AA, Matias-Guiu JA, Matias-Guiu J, Gómez-Pinedo U, Mateos-Díaz JC. Chitosan-hydroxycinnamic acids conjugates: emerging biomaterials with rising applications in biomedicine. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:12473. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012473. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Mendell JR, Al-Zaidy S, Shell R, Arnold WD, Rodino-Klapac LR, Prior TW, et al. Single-dose gene-replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:1713–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706198. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Williams D, Glasstetter LM, Jong TT, Chen T, Kapoor A, Zhu S, et al. High-throughput screening for small-molecule stabilizers of misfolded glucocerebrosidase in Gaucher disease and Parkinson’s disease. PNAS. (2024) 121:e2406009121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2406009121. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Best AJ, Braunschweig U, Wu M, Farhangmehr S, Pasculescu A, Lim JJ, et al. High-throughput sensitive screening of small molecule modulators of microexon alternative splicing using dual Nano and Firefly luciferase reporters. Nat Commun. (2024) 15:6328. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50399-6. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Blay V, Tolani B, Ho SP, Arkin MR. High-throughput screening: today’s biochemical and cell-based approaches. Drug Discov Today. (2020) 25:1807–21. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.07.024. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2004) 3:935–49. doi: 10.1038/nrd1549. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Forli S, Huey R, Pique ME, Sanner MF, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite. Nat Protoc. (2016) 11:905–19. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.051. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wu K, Karapetyan E, Schloss J, Vadgama J, Wu Y. Advancements in small molecule drug design: a structural perspective. Drug Discov Today. (2023) 28:103730. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103730. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Larriba-González T, García-Martín M, Ojeda-Hernández DD, Rincón-Cerrada P, Martín-Blanco L, Benito-Martín MS, et al. Modeling neurodegenerative diseases with brain organoids: from development to disease applications. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2025) 13:1663286. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1663286. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Powell BH, Witwer KW, Meffert MK. Cellular miRNAs and viruses: trends in miRNA sequestering and target de-repression. J Virol. (2025) 99:e0091425. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00914-25. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Carotenuto P, Amato F, Lampis A, Rae C, Hedayat S, Previdi MC, et al. Modulation of pancreatic cancer cell sensitivity to FOLFIRINOX through microRNA-mediated regulation of DNA damage. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:6738. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27099-6. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Bottini S, Pratella D, Grandjean V, Repetto E, Trabucchi M. Recent computational developments on CLIP-seq data analysis and microRNA targeting implications. Briefings Bioinf. (2018) 19:1290–301. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx063. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Chen Y, Yu Y. Tau and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: interplay mechanisms and clinical translation. J Neuroinflamm. (2023) 20:165. doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02853-3. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Mary A, Mancuso R, Heneka MT. Immune activation in Alzheimer disease. Annu Rev Immunol. (2024) 42:585–613. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-101921-035222. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Liu E, Zhang Y, Wang JZ. Updates in Alzheimer’s disease: from basic research to diagnosis and therapies. Transl Neurodegener. (2024) 13:45. doi: 10.1186/s40035-024-00432-x. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kumar MA, Baba SK, Sadida HQ, Marzooqi SA, Jerobin J, Altemani FH, et al. Extracellular vesicles as tools and targets in therapy for diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9:27. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01735-1. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Winkle M, El-Daly SM, Fabbri M, Calin GA. Noncoding RNA therapeutics - challenges and potential solutions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2021) 20:629–51. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00219-z. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Pedder JH, Sonabend AM, Cearns MD, Michael BD, Zakaria R, Heimberger AB, et al. Crossing the blood-brain barrier: emerging therapeutic strategies for neurological disease. Lancet Neurol. (2025) 24:246–60. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00476-9. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

