Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jan 4;66(Suppl 1):S350–S367. doi: 10.1111/trf.70037

Narrative review of strategies for blood product shelf‐life extension

Mike Akaraphanth 1,2,3,✉, Jessica Oudakker 1,2, Matthew Paulson 2,4, Michael Adam Meledeo 5, Kristin M Reddoch‐Cardenas 5, Lusha Xiang 5, Steven G Schauer 1,5, Todd Getz 1,2
PMCID: PMC13184439  PMID: 41485116

Abbreviations

1:1:1

ratio of red blood cells:plasma:platelets

2,3‐DPG

2,3‐diphosphoglycerate

ACP‐215

Automated Cell Processor (Haemonetics)

AS

additive solution

AS‐1

Additive solution 1

AS‐3

Additive solution 3

AS‐5

additive solution 5

AS‐7

additive solution 7

ATP

adenosine triphosphate

COBE 2991

Automated Cell Washer (Terumo BCT)

CP2D

citrate–phosphate–double dextrose

CPD

citrate‐phosphate‐dextrose

CPDA‐1

citrate–phosphate–dextrose–adenine

CPP

cryopreserved platelets

CPRBC

cryopreserved red blood cells

CSP

cold‐stored platelets

DAS

deoxygenation and anaerobic storage

DMSO

dimethyl sulfoxide

EUA

emergency use authorization

FDA

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

FDP

freeze‐dried plasma

FFP

fresh frozen plasma

LSCO

Large‐Scale Combat Operations

LTOWB

low titer group O whole blood

MTF

medical treatment facility

PAS

platelet additive solutions

PDHA

platelet‐derived hemostatic agent

RBC

red blood cell

RCT

randomized controlled trial

RT

room temperature

SD

spray‐dried

TEG

thromboelastography

WB

whole blood

1. INTRODUCTION

Over 90% of potentially survivable United States (U.S.) battlefield fatalities are associated with severe hemorrhage, underscoring the importance of early prehospital blood transfusion to improve survival outcomes. Future near‐peer conflicts, such as Large‐Scale Combat Operations (LSCO), will introduce new challenges, including increased severity of injury patterns, delayed evacuations, and limited resupply of blood products. In such environments, finding innovative ways to prolong the shelf‐life of blood products is critical to ensuring the distribution of an adequate blood supply across operational theaters. This narrative review focuses on current and future methods to extend the shelf‐life of blood products. Many of the highlighted blood products are still in the development pipeline pending regulatory approval and may help support future blood banking constraints or augment whole blood use during times of surge.

2. BACKGROUND

Massive hemorrhage remains the leading cause of potentially preventable death in trauma patients in both civilian and military sectors. 1 , 2 These deaths often occur within 1 h due to exsanguination, coagulopathy, and shock. 1 , 3 , 4 Restoring blood volume, neutralizing coagulopathy, and re‐establishing oxygen and hemostatic function within the first few minutes are crucial to preventing mortality. 5 Thus, trauma resuscitation guidelines emphasize early whole blood or component therapies targeting a 1:1:1 ratio of red blood cells (RBCs), plasma, and platelets. 6 , 7 Around the world, military and civilian institutions are developing Walking Blood Bank programs to facilitate urgent resuscitation efforts in resource‐constrained environments. 8 While observational evidence supports the association of low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) with improved early mortality, logistical benefits, and reduced product utilization versus component therapy, ongoing randomized controlled trials, such as the Low‐Titer Group O Whole Blood or Products (TROOP) Trial, are needed to solidify its superiority. 9 , 10 Nevertheless, whole blood has limited availability, thus requiring additional blood products during times of constraint or surge.

3. MASS CASUALTY EVENTS AND BLOOD SHORTAGES

Future LSCO are expected to have increased rates and severity of injuries, straining blood product inventories. 11 It is anticipated that inventory, resupply, and operational mobility will be challenged due to a highly mobile battlefield, lack of air superiority, and interruption of communications, with modern estimates of anticipated blood requirements rising to 10,000 units per month. 12 , 13 , 14 Civilian health systems have also had challenges maintaining blood inventories during mass casualty events, exemplified by poor donor turnout resulting in shortages during the COVID‐19 pandemic. 15 The relatively short shelf‐life of most blood products adds complexity to maintaining adequate blood inventories, 16 and storage results in physiological reductions in function, often referred to as ‘storage lesions’. 17 , 18 Maintaining blood inventories during LSCO or mass casualty events will require leveraging all existing blood products through advancements that improve shelf‐life. 19 , 20 Here, we review the current methodologies for improving the shelf‐life and efficacy of blood products, including anticoagulants, additives, deoxygenation/anaerobic storage, cryopreservation, and lyophilization of various blood components. Table 1 summarizes the major blood product shelf‐life extension strategies discussed in this review, highlighting their mechanisms and potential advantages in disaster settings (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

General strategies for improving storage and utilization of blood products.

Strategy Description Potential benefit in disaster setting Key references
Ratio‐based rescue of CPD/CP2D‐stored WB with fresh WB supplementation In‐vitro functionality of 35‐day‐old WB stored with anticoagulants of CPD and CP2D can be rescued with 1:4 or 1:5 of fresh WB Potential to extend WB storage beyond 21‐day limitation and to 35 days. Would require in‐vivo validation if pursued Meledeo, et al., Trasnfusion, 2019. Page 1549‐1559 26
Utilizing AS‐7 additive solution for RBC cold storage Pushes cold‐storage duration to 56 days (vs. 42 days) with successful autologous 24‐h post‐transfusion recovery after 56 days of storage (<1% overall hemolysis, >75% RBC recovery) Extends RBC storage to 56 days (vs. 42 days), potentially reducing resupply frequency, increasing local supply, and enhancing disaster preparedness Cancelas, et al., Transfusion, 2015. p. 491–8 29
Using AS‐7 additive solution to allow for room‐temperature holding before processing AS‐7 permitted RBC units to remain viable for up to 42 days of cold‐storage following an extended post‐draw, room temperature WB hold in CPD of 18–24 h, while still supporting successful autologous transfusions to healthy recipients Enables up to 18 h of strategic WB holding before component processing and may confer logistical advantages such as improved inventory management, extended transport windows without expiration, and blood collection outside high‐risk areas. Dumont, L. J., et al., Transfusion, 2015. p. 485–490 33
Deoxygenation and anearobic storage of RBCs Removing oxygen content of RBC units before storage and maintaining these anearobic conditions during cold‐storage Hypoxic storage pushes storage beyond 42 days, potentially +2 weeks with improved post‐transfusion recovery. Initially requiring inert gasses and specialized anearobic chambers, but new technology, such as Hemanext ONE bags, would eliminate this requirement. Increases local RBC unit supply, with possible increased post‐transfusion RBC recovery compared to aerobic storage.

Yoshida, T., et al., Vox Sang, 2007. p. 22–31 60

D'Alessandro, A., et al., Transfusion, 2020. p. 786–798 66

Rabcuka, J., et al., Blood Adv, 2022. p. 5415–5428 64

Dumont, L. J., et al., Transfusion, 2016. p. 392–403 63

Cryopreservation of RBCs Adding glycerol as a cryoprotectant to freshly obtained whole blood to allow freezing blood units for up to 10 years of storage in ≥ −65°C conditions Allows for strategic stockpiling of RBC units and their utilization as a contingency reserve blood supply. Preparation still neccesitates a thawing, deglycerolization, and resuspension process prior to use.

Cap, et al., Military Medicine, 2018. p. 52–54 67

Chang et al., Blood Transfusion, 2017. p. 341–347 68

Cold‐stored platelets Adding specific platelet additive solutions to platelets to allow for cold storage (1°C to 6°C) for up to 14 days. Significantly improves storage duration and local supply of platelets when compared to room‐temperature liquid storage of platelets, which is 5–7 days. CHIPS trial recently completed, assessing noninferiority of cold‐stored platelets with max storage duration of 21 days vs. room temperature‐stored platelets. Cold‐stored platelet phenotype also suggests a potential benefit during hemorrhage.

Strandenes, G., et al., Anesthesiology, 2020. p. 1173–1183 55

Zantek, N.D., et al., Clin Trials, 2023. p. 36–46 56

Apelseth, T.O., et al., Science Series, 2017. p. 488–495 57

Cyropreserved platelets Adding DMSO as a cryoprotectant to allow −80°C storage for up to 2 years and thawing of approximately 10 min with a post‐thaw shelf‐life of within 4 to 6 h. Upcoming Cellphire product CLPH‐511 offers extended storage of 5 years in ≤ −65°C Allows for strategic stockpiling and sustained platelet availability but contingent on intact and reliable cold‐chain infrastructure with point‐of‐care thawing. Significant storage duration benefit over standard liquid stored platelets with limited shelf life of 5–7 days. Frozen activated phenotype of CPP suggested to be beneficial in trauma patients. Successfully implemented in prior military blood banks. CLIP‐II CLIPNZ‐II, and CRYPTIC trials completed comparing efficiency of CPP to liquid stored platelets

Valeri, C.R. et al., Transfusion, 2005. p. 1890–8 81

Cohn, C.S., et al., Vox Sang, 2017. p. 684–688 83

Cid, J., et al., Transfusion, 2016. p. 580–6 84

Noorman, F., et al., PLoS One, 2016. p. e0168401 87

Reade, M.C., et al., BMJ Open, 2022. p. e068933 82

Whitman, G. et al., JTCVS Open. 2022 91

Freeze‐dried plasma Sublimated‐based technique involving the removal of water and solvents from blood products. Allows for increased stability at room temperature and increasing the shelf‐life of its lyophilized product. Easily reconsistuted in minutes. OctoplaLG recently granted emergency use authorization Removes reliance on refrigerated or temperature‐controlled supply chain. Allows for stockpiling of a stable form of blood product and feasible packaging/transport. Utilized by the French military, the German Red Cross, South Africa, the Israeli Defense Force, and the US with an EUA

Zaza, M. et al., Damage Control Resuscitation, 2019. p. 145–62 95

Pusateri, A. E., et al., Anesthesiology, 2022. p. 327–335 105

Shlaifer, A., et al., J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2017. p. 675–682 102

Cuenca, et al., J Spec Oper Med, 2020. p. 43–45 103

Benov, A., et al., Injury, 2016. p. 993–1000 101

Sray dried plasma Evaporation‐based, powder generation process that produces an accumulated dry powder state of plasma that can be easily reconsistuted. Similar to freeze‐dried plasma but not interchangeable; has been shown to be equally efficacious in swine polytrauma hemorrhage models. FrontlineODP, produced by Velico Medical, allows a shelf‐life of up to 2 years at room temperature and short reconstitution times Similar to freeze‐dried plasma, dit does not rely on a refrigerated or temperature‐controlled supply chain. Allows strategic stockpiling with feasible packaging and transport. Easily reconstituted within minutes.

Zaza, M. et al., Damage Control Resuscitation, 2019. p. 145–62 95

Shuja, F., et al., J Trauma, 2011. p. 664–71 112

Pusateri, A.E., et al., Transfusion, 2016. Suppl 1 p. S16‐23 99

Lyophilized platelets Dehydration of platelets and the addition of stabilizing molecules, such as trehalose, to allow room‐temperature storage and easy reconstitution. Still under development and clinical trials. Cellphire's Thrombosomes have a 3‐year shelf‐life at room temperature Substantially increases conventional platelet shelf‐life of 3–5 days and would allow for strategic stockpiling with feasible packaging and transport. Easily reconstituted within minutes. Would not rely on a refrigerated or temperature‐controlled supply chain

Bynum, J.A., et al., Transfusion, 2019. p. 1490–1498 118

Kuhn, B.J., et al., J Thromb Haemost, 2024. p. 686–699 119

Ohanian, M., et al., Am J Hematol, 2022. p. 256–266 120

Goodrich, R.P., et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992. p. 967–7 122

Lyophilized RBCSs

Inducing transient pore formation on RBC membranes to facilitate trehalose loading and allow for lyophilization of RBCs, and increase recovery of viable RBCs

Still under development using novel techniques such as soponification. Potential to strategically store and stockpile RBCs in room temperature conditions, beyond conventional refrigerated shelf‐life durations. Would not rely on a refrigerated or temperature‐controlled supply chain. Feasible packaging and transport Janis, B.R., et al., Cryobiology, 2021. p. 73–79 129

4. ANTICOAGULANTS

4.1. Anticoagulants in whole blood

The primary challenge in maintaining a supply of blood is its inherent ability to clot ex vivo, prompting the development of anticoagulants to temporarily inhibit this process. Citrate is the primary component of anticoagulant solutions for transfusable blood, serving as a safe, reversible calcium chelator to inhibit the calcium‐dependent coagulation cascade. 21 Human blood transfusion with citrate began in 1914 but was standardized by Richard Lewisohn's work in 1915, which established an optimal dosing regimen of sodium citrate and confirmed its biocompatibility in both canine and human subjects; a follow‐on publication reported 22 successful clinical transfusions. 22 His work enabled widespread, reproducible, large‐volume blood transfusions. Building on this foundation, in 1918, U.S. Army physician Oswald Hope Robertson was credited with developing the “world's first blood bank.” 23 Using the “Robertson Blood Jar,” a single‐operator blood collection apparatus prefilled with 3.8% citrate preservative for the collection of universal donor blood, units could be stored for 10 to 14 days on average before transfusion 24 and transported to forward casualty clearing stations for critical transfusions. 22

Modern anticoagulant solutions are still primarily reliant on citrate but also incorporate nutrients and buffers such as dextrose and phosphate to preserve cellular function. Table 2 provides a comparative overview of commonly used anticoagulant and additive solutions, including their approved storage durations, key features, benefits, and selected challenges relevant to blood product storage (Table 2). WB is currently stored in citrate–phosphate‐dextrose (CPD), citrate–phosphate‐double dextrose (CP2D), and citrate–phosphate‐dextrose‐adenine (CPDA‐1). CPD and CP2D are permitted to be stored at 4°C for up to 21 days, while CPDA‐1 allows for 35 days. 16 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 Results from a comparative in vitro analysis of WB stored in CPD, CP2D, or CPDA‐1 for 35 days demonstrated no significant declines in mean platelet volume, hematocrit, or hemoglobin by day 35, although there were significant decreases in platelet count, coagulation function, and platelet aggregation in CPD and CP2D, with higher levels of lactate observed in CP2D by day 14. 26 Interestingly, the decline in function of older or expired WB was mitigated in a simulated massive transfusion by mixing fresh blood with old at ratios of 1:4 or 1:5. 26 This serves as a proof‐of‐concept for extended CPD‐/CP2D‐stored WB in resource‐limited environments, especially in concert with a fresh unit from a walking blood bank.

TABLE 2.

Anticoagulants and additive solutions.

Solution type Solution name Storage duration Key features Benefits Challenges Key references
WB anticoagulants Citrate‐phosphate‐dextrose (CPD) 21‐Days at 4°C Formulation developed in the late 1950's to better support RBC viability during storage The development of CPD improved upon the prior state‐of‐the‐art solution, Acid‐Citrate‐Dextrose (ACD) During massive transfusions, the citrate may contribute to acute hypocalcemia, impaired clotting, and arrhythmias Meledeo, et al., Transfusion, 2019. p. 1549‐1559 26
Citrate‐phosphate‐double dextrose (CP2D) 21‐Days at 4°C Formulation includes: Higher concentrations of dextrose and thus higher osmolarity than CPD intended to support RBCs Developed to better support RBC metabolism and viability Platelet concentrates from CP2D packs demonstrate reduced in vitro function after 5 days of storage Moroff, G., et al., Transfusion, 1983. p. 484‐9 144
Citrate‐phosphate‐dextrose‐adenine (CPDA‐1) 35‐Days at 4°C Formulation includes: Adenine—to help support RBC metabolism CPD supplemented with adenine (CPDA‐1) was in use, increasing the available storage time of WB and RBCs to 35 days. Extensions in shelf‐life were attributed to adenine's contribution to the increased synthesis of adenosine triphosphate Storage lesion still occurs, and hypocalcemia remains a concern during massive transfusions Rock, G., et al., Transfusion, 1998. p. 242‐6 145
RBC additive solutions AS‐1 (Adsol) 42‐Days maintained at 1–6°C Formulation includes: Adenine—to help support RBC Metabolism AS‐1 demonstrates: Increased shelf‐life (42 days) compared to CPDA‐1's 35 days. AS‐1 is a first‐generation additive solution that does not preserve RBC metabolism as well as future iterations Tran, L.N.T., et al., Biomolecules, 2024. p. 14 (7) 146
Dextrose—source of energy Less hemolysis and membrane changes compared to CPDA‐1 and SAGM over 42 days One report of that AS‐1 supernatant may prime polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) on day 42 Sparrow, R.L., et al., Blood Transfus, 2012. Suppl 2 p. s7‐11 147
Mannitol—source of energy and cell membrane stabilizer/osmotic agent
As‐3 (Nutricel) 42‐Days maintained at 1–6°C Formulation includes: Adenine—to help support RBC Metabolism AS‐3 demonstrates: Normal RBC function early in storage <14 days; however, metabolic changes increase, and the storage lesion becomes more pronounced after day 14, likely due to the solutions' lower pH AS‐3 demonstrates impaired metabolic function, loss of cell viability, accumulation of amino acids, and decreased 2,3‐DPG after 14 days of storage D'Amici, G.M., et al., Blood Transfus, 2012. Suppl 2 p. s46‐54 148
Dextrose—source of energy
Citrate—anticoagulant
Sodium chloride—maintains osmotic pressure
Sodium Phosphate—helps with buffering to maintain pH
Solution pH (~5.8)
AS‐5 (E‐Sol) 42‐Days maintained at 1–6°C Formulation includes: Adenine—to help support RBC Metabolism AS‐5 demonstrates: Lower hemolysis and microparticle formation AS‐5 demonstrates an accumulation of Pro‐inflammatory lipids in the supernatant towards the end of storage Radwanski, K., et al., Vox Sang, 2014. p. 322‐9 149
Dextrose—source of energy Higher levels of ATP and 2,3‐DPG in the later stages of storage duration PMN priming activity and higher potassium levels when compared to AS‐1 D'Alessandro, A., et al., Vox Sang, 2015. p. 131‐40 150
Mannitol—source of energy and cell membrane stabilizer/osmotic agent
Sodium chloride—maintains osmotic pressure
AS‐7 (SOLX) 42‐Days maintained at 1–6°C Formulation includes: Adenine—to help support RBC Metabolism AS‐7 demonstrates: Reduced hemolysis, less microparticle formation, improved ATP and 2,3‐DPG preservation, and increased in vivo recovery Concern exists for adenine and/or mannitol toxicity for transfused neonates or during massive transfusion protocols Cancelas, J.A., et al., Transfusion, 2015. p. 491‐8 29
Glucose—source of energy In‐vitro studies suggest the possibility of extending storage with AS‐7 to 56 days; however, this duration is not FDA‐approved D'Alessandro, A., et al., Transfusion, 2015. p. 2955‐66 32
Mannitol—source of energy and cell membrane stabilizer/osmotic agent Jain, R. et al., Transfus Apher Sci, 2001. p. 111‐5 151
Phosphate—helps with buffering to maintain pH
Platelet additive solutions PAS‐C (Intersol) RT 5‐7 Days Formulation includes: Sodium Citrate—to prevent clotting No benefits were observed for cold‐stored platelets stored in Intersol when compared to Isoplate Each additive solution is tied to the perceptive apheresis platform (Amicus into InterSol) Reddoch‐Cardenas, K.M., et al., Transfusion, 2018. p. 1682‐1688 54
4°C 14 Days Sodium Phosphate—to buffer More microaggregates were observed during storage, with an associated decrease in platelet count
Sodium Acetate—to support oxidative phosphorylation
PAS‐F (Isoplate) RT 5–7 Days Formulation includes: Sodium Phosphate—to buffer Cold‐stored platelets demonstrated better: 1. Adhesion to collagen under flow and 2. Clot strength compared to Amicus‐collect apheresis platelets in Intersol Each additive solution is tied to the perceptive apheresis platform (Trima into Isoplate) Thomas, K.A., et al., Transfusion, 2023. Suppl 3. p. S146‐s158 152
4°C 14 Days Sodium Acetate—to support oxidative phosphorylation
Potassium and Magnesium—to preserve platelet quality and prevent activation

5. ADDITIVE SOLUTIONS

5.1. Additives in packed red blood cells

Additive solutions (AS) serve as nutrients for packed RBCs during storage at 1–6°C. 29 AS maintain the levels of 2,3‐diphosphoglycerate (2,3‐DPG) in RBCs, which are critical for optimal hemoglobin‐oxygen affinity in post‐transfusion peripheral tissue oxygenation. 30 AS also maintain intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels integral to RBC morphology, post‐transfusion recovery, and survival. 30 There are currently four FDA‐approved RBC AS: AS‐1 (Adsol®, Fenwal Inc.), AS‐3 (Nutricel™, Cutter Biological), AS‐5 (Optisol™, Terumo Blood and Cell Technologies), and AS‐7 (The SOLX™ System, Hemerus Medical), all of which currently allow for a 42‐day shelf‐life. 16

AS‐7 is an alkaline solution designed to support RBC metabolism, reduce the storage lesion, and provide buffering capacity. 29 , 31 , 32 While AS‐7 is FDA‐approved for 42‐day storage, Cancelas et al. discovered that 82% ± 3% of 56‐day AS‐7 stored RBCs remained viable at 24 h post‐transfusion during autologous in vivo studies, aligning with FDA guidelines that require at least 75% RBC viability with <1% overall hemolysis. 29 Dumont et al. also demonstrated AS‐7's preservation of RBC ATP maintenance in CPD WB over 56 days when initially held for up to 18 h at room temperature (20–24°C) prior to RBC processing and refrigeration. 33 In the 42‐day storage arm, all 27 human recipients in the in vivo post‐transfusion arm also met FDA criteria. 33 The development of AS that allows for delaying WB processing while still permitting up to 42 days of cold storage is advantageous, as it operationally accommodates improved inventory management, extended transport windows, and blood collection outside of high‐risk areas.

5.2. Rejuvenation of red blood cells

RBC rejuvenation is an FDA‐approved process in which aged RBCs are briefly incubated in a solution (such as pyruvate, inosine, phosphate, and adenine) to restore the generation of 2,3‐DPG and ATP, improving oxygen unloading capability and reducing RBC storage lesions. 34 , 35 Decades of studies have been conducted, with the first clinical report of the administration of rejuvenated RBCs to humans in 1972. 36 , 37 Cardiac surgery patients receiving rejuvenated, frozen, deglycerolized cells (stored for 1 year) exhibited higher 2,3‐DPG levels and improved oxygen utilization and cardiac index compared to patients receiving stored allogeneic or autologous RBCs. 38 Interestingly, the rejuvenation process also reduced potassium levels in stored blood, 37 potentially explained by the corresponding reduction in hemolysis and maintenance of ATPase cation pump functionality. 37 However, the potential impacts of using rejuvenated red cells are unclear, including the contributions of solution components, iron homeostasis, oxidative metabolites (such as hypoxanthine), and long‐term circulation post‐transfusion. Thus, clinical trials are warranted to validate the safety and efficacy of rejuvenated RBCs, especially for massive transfusion cases.

5.3. Platelet additive solutions

Platelet additive solutions (PAS) are designed to preserve platelet function during storage. PAS also dilute fibrinogen and coagulation factors by replacing 60–70% of plasma, thereby reducing unintended platelet activation and the risk of transfusion reactions. 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 The components of PAS vary but generally include acetate, citrate, phosphate, potassium, magnesium, and glucose, which serve as metabolic fuels for the citric acid cycle, act as pH buffers, and help maintain normal platelet morphology. 40 , 44 , 45 , 46 More recently, PAS are also being used for cold‐stored platelets (CSP). Traditionally, platelets are stored at room temperature (20–24°C), requiring constant agitation and limiting shelf‐life to 5–7 days. 47 Murphy and Gardner showed in 1969 that CSP rapidly clears from circulation after transfusion and ultimately may not be the best product for oncology patients. 48 These findings led to wide acceptance of room‐temperature platelet storage despite reduced aggregation function versus “activated” cold‐stored platelets. 48 , 49 The disadvantages of room‐temperature platelets—including increased risk of bacterial growth, storage lesions, and ultimately decreased hemostatic function, which reduce their viability for supporting acute bleeding—brought about efforts to reevaluate CSP in the context of acute hemorrhage, as CSP possess beneficial in vitro characteristics, including increased hemostatic function and procoagulant activity. 50 , 51 , 52 , 53

In 2023, the FDA granted an exception to practice (variance) allowing platelets to be continuously stored for up to 14 days at 1 to 6°C, intended for use in active bleeding when room temperature platelets are not available or practical. 54 The FDA's authorization of this new guidance was enacted to account for the limited bioavailability of platelet supply or when the use of conventional platelets is not practical, including but not limited to prehospital, austere, or rural settings, or in mass casualty/public emergency events. 54 This guidance allows platelets to be stored in either plasma or PAS.

Although in vitro data from various studies suggest the specific advantages of CSP over room‐temperature stored platelets, 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 clinical data are currently lacking. Efforts to fill this data gap were investigated by Strandenes et al., who compared room‐temperature stored platelets versus CSP stored for up to 14 days in randomized adults undergoing semi‐urgent complex cardiothoracic surgery. 55 Although limited by sample size, the study revealed no significant differences between measured clinical effect (chest drain output) and platelet functionality assessed by thromboelastography, alluding to a plausible non‐inferiority conclusion. 55 Scaling beyond pilot data, the CHIlled Platelet Study (CHIPS; NCT04834414) is a Phase III, randomized, partially blinded, non‐inferiority, platelet storage study performed at 20 clinical centers that completed enrollment as of July 2025, comparing the transfusion efficacy of room‐temperature stored platelets vs. CSP (with a max storage duration of 21 days in either plasma or PAS) in both adult and pediatric patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures. 56 The outcomes of this study are intended not only to expand platelet reserves but also to demonstrate that CSP provides better hemostatic efficacy versus room‐temperature stored platelets, ideal for trauma resuscitation and acute hemorrhage control. 51 , 52 , 56 , 57

6. DEOXYGENATION/ANAEROBIC STORAGE: HYPOXIC RBCs

Isolated RBCs stored for long durations under hypothermic conditions accumulate physical and metabolic perturbations due to accumulated oxidative damage, which consequently decreases their viability and function 18 and leads to hemolysis and shortened RBC survivability in post‐transfusion recipients. 58 , 59 Deoxygenation and anaerobic storage (DAS) methods mitigate these pro‐inflammatory effects, subsequently leading to preserved ATP and 2,3‐DPG levels, improved RBC structural integrity, and decreased hemolysis rates. 60 Mechanistically, DAS lowers oxygen content (thus mitigating prooxidant reactions) prior to cold storage and maintains this hypoxic environment throughout storage. 18

In 2007, Yoshida et al. illustrated this process with a stepwise deoxygenation method involving repetitive gas exchange in multiple RBC units using AS‐3 followed by six cycles of 10‐minute exposure to ultra‐pure argon gas. 60 Deoxygenated RBC units were then cold‐stored in vented anaerobic chambers to prevent reoxygenation and compared against standard controls. 60 Deoxygenated RBCs with AS‐3 had significantly less hemolysis, more ATP (79 ± 24% remaining ATP at 10 weeks vs. 36 ± 12% for aerobic units), and improved membrane stability after 6 weeks. 60 Transfusion of six participants with similarly prepared RBCs, exposed to DAS conditions for up to 8 weeks, met FDA guidelines (<0.8% overall hemolysis and 24‐h post‐transfusion RBC >75%), effectively prolonging RBC storage by at least 2 weeks. 60 , 61 Additionally, DAS improved 24‐h autologous post‐transfusion RBC mean recovery (83.1 ± 5.4%) compared to previous reports (73.5 ± 13.7%). 60 , 62 Dumont et al. investigated the cause of these metabolic benefits by controlling CO2 removal during DAS and derived that significantly higher 2,3‐DPG concentrations were associated with CO2 removal, while the increased ATP levels were secondary to deoxygenation. 63

Hemanext was recently granted de novo authorization in the U.S. for a DAS process that eliminates the need for inert gases or a separate anaerobic storage canister. 64 The Hemanext ONE system is designed for processing and storing leukocyte‐reduced RBCs for up to 42 days with reduced oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations. The system uses a specialized Oxygen Reduction Bag and Storage Bag to control O2 and CO2 concentrations, with strict protocols for processing within 12 h of collection. 65 Alessandro et al. conducted a small two‐arm cross‐sectional study with 12 healthy volunteers donating two units of blood: one cold‐stored aerobically and the other utilizing the Hemanext ONE system. 66 Autologous 24‐h post‐transfusion RBC recovery after 42 days revealed a significant increase of hypoxic RBCs over standard controls (90.2 ± 6.5% vs. 87.3 ± 4.1% in aerobic controls) without exceeding >1% overall hemolysis. 66

Early clinical transfusion studies confirm the feasibility and safety of hypoxic RBCs, with the potential to extend shelf‐life, preserve cell quality, and enhance oxygen delivery, amplifying the biological and logistical benefits of DAS. The logistical benefit of hypoxic RBCs would enable strategic stockpiling of blood reserves without compromising functional viability. However, large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in critically injured patients would be required to delineate the effectiveness of hypoxic RBCs in trauma.

7. CRYOPRESERVATION

7.1. Cryopreserved red blood cells

Cryopreservation of red blood cells (CPRBC) is the process of storing RBC units in temperatures below −65°C, which reduces metabolism and arrests biochemical reactions within RBCs, allowing for long‐term storage. 67 CPRBC was first implemented at scale aboard U.S. Navy ships in 1956 and saw successful usage during the Vietnam War but never entered widespread implementation. The advent of glycerolization (a cryoprotective process achieved by adding 40% weight per volume of glycerol) allowed for the storage of blood products for up to 10 years, 68 with experimental storage durations reaching up to 37 years. 69 However, glycerol causes osmotic lysis upon transfusion, making post‐thaw deglycerolization a necessary yet cumbersome step 68 taking ~95 to 105 min, including thawing time. 70 Novel strategies to reduce CPRBC processing time are warranted to improve operational readiness of the product. 67 , 71 Although not widely used in the majority of military blood banks and national stockpiles, 72 it should be noted that the Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies provided guidance on the retirement of one of the major CPRBC automated cell processors, the COBE® 2991 (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA), planned for complete discontinuation in March 2031. 72 , 73 This open‐system workflow was limited by a 24‐h post‐thaw shelf‐life, operator‐dependent glycerolization, non‐integrated pre‐/post‐thaw processing steps, and a higher risk of microbial contamination, whereas the closed‐system ACP‐215 (Haemonetics Corporation, Braintree, MA, USA) streamlines both glycerolization and deglycerolization and extends post‐thaw shelf‐life to 14 days when resuspended in AS‐3. 72 , 74 , 75 , 76

From a military perspective, thawed and deglycerized CPRBCs are largely limited to Role 2 and higher Medical Treatment Facilities (MTFs), due to their 14‐day post‐processing shelf‐life in 1–6°C. 70 , 77 Therefore, the primary role for CPRBCs in military medicine is supplementing LTOWB during periods of increased demand. 70 Attempts to improve the process include Liu et al.'s dilution‐filtration method that sought to reduce the deglycerolization time of porcine erythrocytes at the cost of lower RBC recovery compared to the standard automated cell washers used today. 70 , 78 , 79

7.2. Cryopreserved platelets

Hematologist Robert C. Valeri developed a method for cryopreservation of platelets (CPP) at the Naval Blood Research Laboratory, utilizing 6% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a cryoprotectant and allowing for storage at −80°C for up to 2 years. 80 Valeri also introduced a “no‐wash” procedure before freezing, removing ~95% of the DMSO and reducing post‐thaw preparation time to about 10 min 81 with a post‐thaw shelf‐life of 4 to 6 h. 82 , 83 Compared to liquid‐stored platelets, cryopreserved platelets exhibit accelerated clotting time and significantly stronger clot firmness measured by thromboelastography. 80 , 84 , 85

Due to the activated phenotype of CPP, their use is more optimal for acute hemorrhage and trauma rather than prophylactic administration. 86 , 87 A 1999 randomized clinical trial of 53 patients comparing cryopreserved to conventional liquid platelet transfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery revealed no adverse sequelae and showed decreased median blood loss (1721 mL vs. 2298 mL) and decreased overall blood product usage. 80 , 88 More recently, a pilot randomized clinical trial revealed no adverse post‐transfusion events in either liquid‐stored platelets or CPP. 89

Additionally, CPP has been successfully implemented in military MTFs, with the Dutch Military Blood Bank incorporating frozen platelets amid coalition force deployments in Afghanistan between 2006 and 2010 during an introduction of massive transfusion protocols. 87 Protocols that included frozen blood products led to improved mortality rates and a very low incidence of transfusion reactions (1 out of 3060 transfused products). 87 Several notable advancements have happened in 2025. Cellphire's CLPH‐511 CPP offers extended storage up to 5 years at ≤ −65°C with an injectable suspension that reduces thaw time to approximately 15 min 90 and has received FDA Fast Track designation for the treatment of acute hemorrhage when conventional platelets are not readily available. 87 , 90 CLPH‐511 recently completed a multicenter RCT evaluating its non‐inferiority or superiority to liquid‐stored platelets in patients undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery (CRYPTICS trial). 91 The primary endpoint was measured as the total blood volume in chest tube drainage 24 h postoperatively, with preliminary data meeting the primary efficacy endpoint (Difference in least‐square means: 142.0 mL; 95.576% CI of volume difference below the noninferiority margin). Vitrafy Life Sciences' rapid cryopreservation platform also demonstrated CPP that achieved greater than 88% post‐thaw recovery and demonstrated regulatory‐grade hemostatic function in commercial unit sizes. 92 Furthermore, two large, blinded, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trials during complex surgical operations comparing CPP versus liquid platelets (CLIP‐II and CLIPNZ‐II trials) were completed, with results awaiting publication. 82

In the context of LSCO or mass‐casualty events, having a platelet product with a 2‐year shelf‐life will augment the immediate need for platelet collection efforts. However, it is worth noting that the distribution of freezers and thawers will be required throughout the military theater and public sectors in order to maintain an inventory of CPP.

8. GENERAL LYOPHILIZATION OF BLOOD PRODUCTS

Lyophilization, or “freeze‐drying”, is a sublimation‐based technique that involves the removal of water and solvents from blood products. 93 Freeze‐dried blood products are attractive due to their smaller footprint, increased shelf‐life, and increased stability at room temperature. Their prepared storage formulation allows for immediate reconstitution with an appropriate liquid, such as sterile water, without reliance on a refrigerated temperature‐controlled supply chain. This capability can significantly expand the availability of blood products in prehospital environments, offering clear logistical benefits in LSCO. Lyophilized blood products in the forward‐deployed environment (pre‐Role 2) could reduce or eliminate cold‐chain and temperature tag data collection requirements and allow for strategic positioning and stockpiling. 12

8.1. Lyophilization of plasma

The lyophilization of plasma products dates back to the 1930s from canine traumatic shock resuscitation experiments. 94 During World War II, lyophilized plasma was mass‐produced and widely distributed, mostly by the American Red Cross, with more than 10 million units of pooled lyophilized plasma created for Allied Forces. 95 , 96 , 97 In 1950, French military physician Jean Julliard adopted the use of freeze‐dried plasma (FDP) alongside the establishment of the French Military Blood Institute (Centre de Transfusion Sanguine des Armées), which is still producing FDP for military and austere civilian populations today. 98 , 99 , 100 Lyophilized plasma has had widespread use in South Africa, Germany, and the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps, with United States Army Special Operations Forces using French‐produced FDP under an emergency use authorization (EUA). 93 , 95 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105

FDP can be easily reconstituted (less than 6 min), with post‐transfusion coagulation profiles comparable to those of thawed plasma, making it desirable as a first‐line blood product that reduces transfusion time for combat casualties facing long transport times. 106 Donors traditionally undergo rigorous medical screening to verify appropriate coagulation factor levels with an active hemovigilance program to ensure trace‐back. 98 Large batch production of dried plasma products requires vigilant pathogen control; pathogen reduction techniques include photochemical inactivation (where molecules such as amotosalen bind to the genetic material of pathogens, followed by ultraviolet light exposure for inactivation 95 , 107 ) and solvent‐detergent treatments (which disrupt lipid‐enveloped viruses and bacteria, followed by filtration for their removal). Recent advancements in these treatments incorporate prion removal and improved preservation of clotting factors as well. 95 , 108

In a systematic review of 12 studies, FDP use during major trauma cases showed no significant differences in mortality rates or the need for transfusion of allogeneic blood products when compared to thawed plasma. 106 Although there are currently no fully approved U.S.‐manufactured FDP products, efforts are ongoing, with FDA approval expected imminently. 109 OctaplasLG Powder, a lyophilized version of Octapharma's FDA‐approved Octaplas (pooled plasma treated with the aforementioned solvent‐detergent), received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) within the Department of Defense in August 2024. 109 The EUA currently enables U.S. military forces to acquire, distribute, and store OctaplasLG for use in treating hemorrhage or coagulopathy when traditional plasma is unavailable or impractical.

8.2. Spray‐drying of plasma

Spray‐drying (SD) involves subjecting liquid plasma to high‐pressure gases through a small nozzle, creating particle liquid droplets. These droplets are then exposed to temperatures of up to 150°C, followed by rapid evaporation and cooling to generate a dry, stable powder. 95 This is an evaporation‐based process that results in a powder formulation that can be easily reconstituted with the appropriate solution. SD plasma harbors similar logistical benefits to FDP, although the two products are distinct.

An in vitro study by Booth et al. showed that SD resulted in decreased Factor VIII activity and von Willebrand factor antigen activity compared to fresh frozen plasma (FFP), 110 although Spinella et al. observed overall higher total thrombin generation compared to both FDP and FFP. 111 Animal studies comparing SD and FFP in a polytrauma, hemorrhagic shock swine model showed that SD was equally effective as FFP in reversing trauma‐associated coagulopathy and improving survival. 112 Other newer and notable products include FrontlineODP, produced by Velico Medical's single‐unit SD technology, which preserves coagulation factors with short reconstitution times (3 to 4 min) and storage up to 2 years. 113 , 114 , 115 FrontlineODP recently completed its phase I clinical trial sponsored by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority. 116 , 117

8.3. Lyophilization of platelets

The limited shelf‐life of platelets has spurred research into a lyophilized form. 118 Thrombosomes (Cellphire Therapeutics) are a platelet‐derived hemostatic agent (PDHA) manufactured from pooled blood group O platelets that are trehalose‐loaded to stabilize membranes and prevent ice crystal formation. 119 Thrombosomes have a 3‐year shelf‐life at room temperature, can be reconstituted in sterile water within 2–3 min, and present with activated surface markers, potentially improving bleeding control. 120 A phase I study found acceptable safety outcomes in 24 bleeding, thrombocytopenic patients with hematological malignancies who received PDHA doses of up to 3.78 X 108 particles/kg. 120 PDHAs are currently undergoing Phase 2 clinical trials. 120 , 121

8.4. Lyophilized red blood cells

In 1992, Cliff et al. evaluated the stability of lyophilized lipid‐encapsulated hemoglobin, and Goodrich et al. established that concentrated, washed, and lyophilized human RBCs preserved metabolic function. 122 , 123 Han et al. further developed the concept by demonstrating that a protective solution of 40% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 25% human serum albumin, and 5% DMSO produced an increased cell recovery rate of 80%. 124 Other studies have demonstrated that trehalose loading in RBCs decreases hemolysis due to the disaccharide's ability to replace water molecules' hydrogen bonds during dehydration, which stabilizes cellular membranes and prevents degradative pathways. 125 Additionally, the inclusion of phospholipid vesicles in the lyophilization buffer has been shown to increase cell survival and further reduce hemolysis rates. 126 Only one published clinical study of nonsynthetic lyophilized RBC exists, a 1992 early clinical study of four volunteers revealing low recovery secondary to rapid hepatic and splenic sequestration. 127 However, multiple pre‐clinical efforts are underway using modern stabilization techniques and production equipment. 128 , 129

8.5. Biosynthetics

The reliance on blood products and potential supply gaps has generated renewed interest in biosynthetic human blood substitutes. Ideally, these biosynthetic blood products would be stable in the austere environment and a viable resuscitation option when donated blood is unavailable. Worth mentioning is ErythoMer, a lyophilized product composed of recycled human hemoglobin encased in deformable, hybrid peptidic‐lipid nanoparticles and serving the purpose of the endogenous RBC. 130 , 131 Similarly, SynthoPlate can also be freeze‐dried and is an IV platelet‐mimetic liposomal nanoparticle coated with peptide triggers that activate its aggregation. 132 Both platforms remain under development with demonstrated efficacy in preclinical hemorrhage models and would substantially increase the shelf‐life of their blood component equivalent. 131 , 132

9. DISCUSSION

Hemorrhage is the primary cause of preventable in‐hospital deaths in U.S. civilian trauma centers and accounted for 90.9% of potentially survivable prehospital deaths during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. 1 , 133 Restoring blood volume is the best way to prevent hemorrhage‐associated deaths, but the limitations on blood product shelf‐life often contribute to restrictive usage, especially prehospital, in order to prevent waste and ensure supply in hospitals. This narrative review aimed to identify methods to prolong the shelf‐life of blood products and therefore enhance their availability wherever resuscitation is needed, even at the point of injury.

Several studies have revealed promising combinations of methods that would allow for shelf‐life extension during the storage of blood products and introduced new opportunities to logistically improve blood support infrastructure. Stretching current anticoagulant and additive solution capabilities has been low‐hanging fruit, and renewed interest in the cryopreservation and freeze‐ or spray‐drying of blood elements offers potentially dramatic improvements in the duration and functional capacity of stored blood products. It's worth noting that a current limitation is that donor screening does not assess coagulation status. However, the manufacturer of the dried blood product will need to comply with FDA regulations by setting quality control parameters for its product, such as potency and stability, to ensure consistency between manufactured lots. 134

Currently, the FDA allows refrigerated storage of RBCs for up to 42 days and platelets for only 14 days (when conventional, room‐temperature, 5–7 day stored platelets are not available or their use is not practical). The benefits of early resuscitation with whole blood are well described; however, since functional clotting parameters are not characterized, the question remains if the transfused unit was the most efficient product to reverse coagulopathy or adequately support hemostasis. 135 , 136 , 137

Since RBCs and platelets have distinct physiology and metabolism, decades of research have been conducted to address the storage lesions of these cells. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the metabolic, cytoskeletal, and other deficiencies that occur in these cells throughout the course of storage will provide new therapeutic targets to extend blood shelf‐life. In the meantime, more clinical studies to elucidate the specific implementations of these combined practices are needed to understand the risk versus benefit of changing blood product storage policies to accommodate increased blood supply demand.

While the blood research community continues to explore novel techniques to extend blood product shelf‐life, during instances of blood product surge (LSCO, mass casualty events, pandemics, etc.), blood centers and transfusion services will need to implement lessons learned from previous periods of blood shortages. 138 Blood centers will need to increase donor recruitment, be aware of the supply chain, consider utilizing alternative approved collection kits, potentially adopt nonconforming manufacturing processes, support adequate staffing and training needs, leverage neighboring or regional blood banks to share inventory, and consider shipping inventory nationally. 138 , 139 Transfusion services will need to implement conservation methods, such as triage priority, splitting units, canceling elective surgeries, and, in extreme instances, consider utilizing expired products. 138 Riley et al. have shown there was no association in mortality when combat trauma patients were transfused with expired blood products up to 1 week past expiration; however, this practice should be approached with caution and careful risk assessment. 140 Adopting new blood products remains challenging due to the cost of development, the necessary large‐scale multiple‐phase clinical trial requirements, and the lack of clear future reimbursement rates. 141 , 142 Despite these challenges, blood centers will continue to improve on prior lessons learned, plan, and train for future shortages. Additionally, the Armed Services blood program has the opportunity to implement novel blood solutions under an EUA, which may offset future wartime blood shortages. 143

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors have nothing to report.

Akaraphanth M, Oudakker J, Paulson M, Meledeo MA, Reddoch‐Cardenas KM, Xiang L, et al. Narrative review of strategies for blood product shelf‐life extension. Transfusion. 2026;66(Suppl. 1):S350–S367. 10.1111/trf.70037

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Army Medical Department, Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T, Uribe P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001‐2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–S437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Eastridge BJ, Holcomb JB, Shackelford S. Outcomes of traumatic hemorrhagic shock and the epidemiology of preventable death from injury. Transfusion. 2019;59(S2):1423–1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. McNicholl BP. The golden hour and prehospital trauma care. Injury. 1994;25(4):251–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kotwal RS, Howard JT, Orman JA, Tarpey BW, Bailey JA, Champion HR, et al. The effect of a golden hour policy on the morbidity and mortality of combat casualties. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):15–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Meyer DE, Vincent LE, Fox EE, O'Keeffe T, Inaba K, Bulger E, et al. Every minute counts: Time to delivery of initial massive transfusion cooler and its impact on mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1):19–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, Fox EE, Wade CE, Podbielski JM, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(5):471–482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cap A, Gurney J, Spinella P, Strandenes G, Schreiber M, Holcomb J, et al. Damage Control Resuscitation. Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) [Online PDF] 2019 [cited 2025]; Version 3.0 (12 July 2019): [Clinical Practice Guideline, ID18]. https://jts.health.mil/assets/docs/cpgs/Damage_Control_Resuscitation_12_Jul_2019_ID18.pdf
  • 8. Martinaud C, Scorer T, Lozano M, Miles A, Fitchett G, Ba A, et al. International Forum on Walking Blood Bank Programmes: Summary. Vox Sang. 2021;116(8):924–929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Coulthard SL, Kaplan LJ, Cannon JW. What's new in whole blood resuscitation? In the trauma bay and beyond. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024;30(3):209–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Jansen JO, Pedroza C, Novelo LL, Hao T, DeWildt GR, Coton CF, et al. Trauma resuscitation with low‐titer Group O whole blood or products: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (the TROOP trial). Trials. 2025;26(1):266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Remondelli MH, Remick KN, Shackelford SA, Gurney JM, Pamplin JC, Polk TM, et al. Casualty care implications of large‐scale combat operations. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95(2S Suppl 1):S180–s184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Schauer SG, Long BJ, Rizzo JA, Walrath BD, Baker JB, Gillespie KR, et al. A Conceptual Framework for Non‐Military Investigators to Understand the Joint Roles of Medical Care in the Setting of Future Large Scale Combat Operations. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(1):67–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Gurney JM, Cap AP, Holcomb JB, Staudt AM, Tadlock MD, Polk TM, et al. The thin red line: blood planning factors and the enduring need for a robust military blood system to support combat operations. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024;97(2S):S31–S36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Schauer SG, April MD. Large‐scale combat operations and implications for the emergency medicine community. Ann Emerg Med. 2022;80(5):456–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. McGann PT, Weyand AC. Lessons learned from the COVID‐19 pandemic blood supply crisis. J Hosp Med. 2022;17(7):574–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. U.S.F.A.D Administration . 21 CFR § 610.53—Dating periods for biological products. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21: Food and Drugs, Part 610—General Biological Products Standards [Online] 2025 [cited 2025]; Current through August 27, 2025: [Federal regulation specifying expiration dating requirements for licensed biological products, including blood components and derivatives]. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-610/subpart-F/section-610.53
  • 17. Mays JA, Hess JR. Modelling the effects of blood component storage lesions on the quality of haemostatic resuscitation in massive transfusion for trauma. Blood Transfus. 2017;15(2):153–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Yoshida T, Prudent M, D'Alessandro A. Red blood cell storage lesion: causes and potential clinical consequences. Blood Transfus. 2019;17(1):27–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Gammon RR, Rosenbaum L, Cooke R, Friedman M, Rockwood L, Nichols T, et al. Maintaining adequate donations and a sustainable blood supply: Lessons learned. Transfusion. 2021;61(1):294–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Erickson ML, Champion MH, Klein R, Ross RL, Neal ZM, Snyder EL. Management of blood shortages in a tertiary care academic medical center: the Yale‐New Haven Hospital frozen blood reserve. Transfusion. 2008;48(10):2252–2263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Getz TM, Turgeon A, Wagner SJ. Sodium citrate contributes to the platelet storage lesion. Transfusion. 2019;59(6):2103–2112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mollison PL. The introduction of citrate as an anticoagulant for transfusion and of glucose as a red cell preservative. Br J Haematol. 2000;108(1):13–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hess JR, Schmidt PJ. The first blood banker: Oswald Hope Robertson. Transfusion. 2000;40(1):110–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Robertson OH. Transfusion with preserved red blood cells. Br Med J. 1918;1(2999):691–695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nakao M, Nakao T, Tatibana M, Yoshikawa H, Abe T. Effect of inosine and adenine on adenosine triphosphate regeneration and shape transformation in long‐stored erythrocyts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1959;32:564–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Meledeo MA, Peltier GC, McIntosh CS, Bynum JA, Cap AP. Optimizing whole blood storage: hemostatic function of 35‐day stored product in CPD, CP2D, and CPDA‐1 anticoagulants. Transfusion. 2019;59(S2):1549–1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Mayer K, Ley A, D'Amaro J. Impairment of Red Cell Viability by Exposure to “Excess” Acid—Citrate Dextrose. Blood. 1966;28(4):513–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cap AP, Beckett A, Benov A, Borgman M, Chen J, Corley JB, et al. Whole blood transfusion. Mil Med. 2018;183(suppl_2):44–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Cancelas JA, Dumont LJ, Maes LA, Rugg N, Herschel L, Whitley PH, et al. Additive solution‐7 reduces the red blood cell cold storage lesion. Transfusion. 2015;55(3):491–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lagerberg JW, Korsten H, Van Der Meer PF, De Korte D. Prevention of red cell storage lesion: a comparison of five different additive solutions. Blood Transfus. 2017;15(5):456–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Koch CG, Li L, Sessler DI, Figueroa P, Hoeltge GA, Mihaljevic T, et al. Duration of red‐cell storage and complications after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1229–1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. D'Alessandro A, Nemkov T, Hansen KC, Szczepiorkowski ZM, Dumont LJ. Red blood cell storage in additive solution‐7 preserves energy and redox metabolism: a metabolomics approach. Transfusion. 2015;55(12):2955–2966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Dumont LJ, Cancelas JA, Maes LA, Rugg N, Whitley P, Herschel L, et al. Overnight, room temperature hold of whole blood followed by 42‐day storage of red blood cells in additive solution‐7. Transfusion. 2015;55(3):485–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Evans BA, Ansari AK, Srinivasan AJ, Kamyszek RW, Stoner KC, Fuller M, et al. Rejuvenation solution as an adjunct cold storage solution maintains physiological haemoglobin oxygen affinity during early‐storage period of red blood cells. Vox Sang. 2020;115(5):388–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Enten G, Dalvi P, Martini N, Kausch K, Gray A, Landrigan M, et al. Rapid bedside rejuvenation of red blood cell with an autologous cell salvage device. Vox Sang. 2018;113:562–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Valeri CR, Zaroulis CG. Rejuvenation and freezing of outdated stored human red cells. N Engl J Med. 1972;287(26):1307–1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Smethurst PA, Jolley J, Braund R, Proffitt S, Lynes T, Hazell M, et al. Rejuvenation of RBCs: validation of a manufacturing method suitable for clinical use. Transfusion. 2019;59(9):2952–2963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Dennis RC, Vito L, Weisel RD, Valeri CR, Berger RL, Hechtman HB. Improved myocardial performance following high 2‐3 diphosphoglycerate red cell transfusions. Surgery. 1975;77(6):741–747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. van der Meer PF, de Korte D. Platelet Additive Solutions: A Review of the Latest Developments and Their Clinical Implications. Transfus Med Hemother. 2018;45(2):98–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ringwald J, Zimmermann R, Eckstein R. The new generation of platelet additive solution for storage at 22 degrees C: development and current experience. Transfus Med Rev. 2006;20(2):158–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Tobian AA, Fuller AK, Uglik K, Tisch DJ, Borge PD, Benjamin RJ, et al. The impact of platelet additive solution apheresis platelets on allergic transfusion reactions and corrected count increment (CME). Transfusion. 2014;54(6):1523–1529. quiz 1522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Getz TM, Montgomery RK, Bynum JA, Aden JK, Pidcoke HF, Cap AP. Storage of platelets at 4°C in platelet additive solutions prevents aggregate formation and preserves platelet functional responses. Transfusion. 2016;56(6):1320–1328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Reddoch‐Cardenas KM, Montgomery RK, Lafleur CB, Peltier GC, Bynum JA, Cap AP. Cold storage of platelets in platelet additive solution: an in vitro comparison of two Food and Drug Administration‐approved collection and storage systems. Transfusion. 2018;58(7):1682–1688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Rajashekaraiah V, Rajanand MC. Platelet storage: Progress so far. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023;55(1):9–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sandgren P, Mayaudon V, Payrat J‐M, Sjödin A, Gulliksson H. Storage of buffy‐coat‐derived platelets in additive solutions: in vitro effects on platelets stored in reformulated PAS supplied by a 20% plasma carry‐over. Vox Sang. 2010;98(3 Pt 2):415–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Van Aelst B, Bens K, Sabot B, Vertongen S, Feys HB, Compernolle V, et al. Platelet Additive Solutions SSP+ and T‐PAS+ Are Interchangeable for Platelet Concentrate Storage despite Differences in Composition and Plasticizer. Transfus Med Hemother. 2024;51(6):424–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Schiffer CA, Lee EJ, Ness PM, Reilly J. Clinical evaluation of platelet concentrates stored for one to five days. Blood. 1986;67(6):1591–1594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Murphy S, Gardner FH. Platelet preservation. Effect of storage temperature on maintenance of platelet viability—deleterious effect of refrigerated storage. N Engl J Med. 1969;280(20):1094–1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Slichter SJ, Harker LA. Preparation and storage of platelet concentrates. Transfusion. 1976;16(1):8–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Reddoch‐Cardenas KM, Bynum JA, Meledeo MA, Nair PM, Wu X, Darlington DN, et al. Cold‐stored platelets: A product with function optimized for hemorrhage control. Transfus Apher Sci. 2019;58(1):16–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Pidcoke HF, Spinella PC, Ramasubramanian AK, Strandenes G, Hervig T, Ness PM, et al. Refrigerated platelets for the treatment of acute bleeding: a review of the literature and reexamination of current standards. Shock. 2014;41(Suppl 1):51–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Reddoch KM, Pidcoke HF, Montgomery RK, Fedyk CG, Aden JK, Ramasubramanian AK, et al. Hemostatic function of apheresis platelets stored at 4°C and 22°C. Shock. 2014;41(Suppl 1):54–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Getz TM. Physiology of cold‐stored platelets. Transfus Apher Sci. 2019;58(1):12–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. FDA (U.S.F.A.D.A) . Alternative Procedures for the Manufacture of Cold‐Stored Platelets Intended for the Treatment of Active Bleeding When Conventional Platelets are Not Available or Their Use is Not Practical. Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 121 [Online], 2023 [cited 2025]; Final Guidance Notice:[Notice of availability and guidance for industry from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, establishing alternative procedures for manufacture of cold‐stored platelets under Title 21 CFR]. 2023. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/06/26/2023‐13513/alternative‐procedures‐for‐the‐manufacture‐of‐cold‐stored‐platelets‐intended‐for‐the‐treatment‐of
  • 55. Strandenes G, Sivertsen J, Bjerkvig CK, Fosse TK, Cap AP, del Junco DJ, et al. A Pilot Trial of Platelets Stored Cold versus at Room Temperature for Complex Cardiothoracic Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2020;133(6):1173–1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Zantek ND, Steiner ME, VanBuren JM, Lewis RJ, Berry NS, Viele K, et al. Design and logistical considerations for the randomized adaptive non‐inferiority storage‐duration‐ranging CHIlled Platelet Study. Clin Trials. 2023;20(1):36–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Apelseth TO, Cap AP, Spinella PC, Hervig T, Strandenes G. Cold stored platelets in treatment of bleeding. ISBT Sci Ser. 2017;12(4):488–495. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Yoshida T, Shevkoplyas SS. Anaerobic storage of red blood cells. Blood Transfus. 2010;8(4):220–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Rapido F, Brittenham GM, Bandyopadhyay S, la Carpia F, L'Acqua C, McMahon D, et al. Prolonged red cell storage before transfusion increases extravascular hemolysis. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(1):375–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Yoshida T, AuBuchon JP, Tryzelaar L, Foster KY, Bitensky MW. Extended storage of red blood cells under anaerobic conditions. Vox Sang. 2007;92(1):22–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Heaton WM. Red blood cell hemolysis: an old standard in changing times. Transfusion. 2009;49(12):2551–2554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Luten M, Roerdinkholder‐Stoelwinder B, Schaap NPM, de Grip WJ, Bos HJ, Bosman GJCGM. Survival of red blood cells after transfusion: a comparison between red cells concentrates of different storage periods. Transfusion. 2008;48(7):1478–1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Dumont LJ, D'Alessandro A, Szczepiorkowski ZM, Yoshida T. CO2 ‐dependent metabolic modulation in red blood cells stored under anaerobic conditions. Transfusion. 2016;56(2):392–403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Rabcuka J, Blonski S, Meli A, Sowemimo‐Coker S, Zaremba D, Stephenson D, et al. Metabolic reprogramming under hypoxic storage preserves faster oxygen unloading from stored red blood cells. Blood Adv. 2022;6(18):5415–5428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Hemanext . Hemanext ONE. [Web Page] 2023 [cited 2025 August 2, 2025]; Official product description of the Hemanext ONE red blood cell processing and storage system.
  • 66. D'Alessandro A, Yoshida T, Nestheide S, Nemkov T, Stocker S, Stefanoni D, et al. Hypoxic storage of red blood cells improves metabolism and post‐transfusion recovery. Transfusion. 2020;60(4):786–798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Cap A, Badloe J, Woolley T, Prat N, Gonzales R, Malloy W, et al. The Use of Frozen and Deglycerolized Red Blood Cells. Mil Med. 2018;183(suppl_2):52–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Chang A, Kim Y, Hoehn R, Jernigan P, Pritts T. Cryopreserved packed red blood cells in surgical patients: past, present, and future. Blood Transfus. 2017;15(4):341–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Valeri CR, Ragno G, Pivacek LE, Cassidy GP, Srey R, Hansson‐Wicher M, et al. An experiment with glycerol‐frozen red blood cells stored at −80 degrees C for up to 37 years. Vox Sang. 2000;79(3):168–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Corley JB, Wilson CR, Hebert JC, Collins MJ, Davis MJ, Hill R , et al. Frozen and Deglycerolized Red Blood Cells Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) [Online PDF] 2024 05 August 2024 [cited 2025 August 27, 2025]; Version 1.1:[Guidance for the use of frozen and thawed/deglycerolized red blood cells in the combat theater (CPG ID: 26)]. Available from: https://jts.health.mil/assets/docs/cpgs/Frozen_Deglycerolized_Red-Blood_Cells_05_Aug_2024_ID26_v1.1.pdf
  • 71. Sen A, Khetarpal A. Comparative study of automated cryopreservation of red blood cells. Med J Armed Forces India. 2013;69(4):345–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Howell A, Kurach J, William N, Hill A, Dennis B, Acker JP. Deglycerolization of manually glycerolized, frozen red cell concentrates using a closed system cell processor. Transfusion. 2025;65(4):664–668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies . Information for COBE® 2991 Sunsetting. [Internet] 2025 [cited 2025 November 5, 2025]. https://www.aabb.org/blood‐biotherapies/blood/transfusion‐medicine/transfusion‐medicine‐resources/information‐for‐cobe‐2991‐sunsetting
  • 74. Lu M, Lezzar DL, Vörös E, Shevkoplyas. Traditional and emerging technologies for washing and volume reducing blood products. J Blood Med. 2019;10:37–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Howell A, Hill A, Lefresne W, Dennis B, Turner TR, Yi QL, et al. Impact of input volume on red cell quality in deglycerolized RBCs using a modified ACP‐215 protocol. Transfusion. 2025;65(1):194–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Laforce‐Lavoie A, Constanzo‐Yanez J, Chevrier MC, Cloutier M. Automated processing of Meryman‐frozen red blood cells: a novel protocol for deglycerolization. Transfusion. 2025;65(4):732–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Henkelman S, Noorman F, Badloe JF, Lagerberg JW. Utilization and quality of cryopreserved red blood cells in transfusion medicine. Vox Sang. 2015;108(2):103–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Liu J, Ding W, Zhou X, Kang Y, Zou L, Li C, et al. Deglycerolization of red blood cells: A new dilution‐filtration system. Cryobiology. 2018;81:160–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Chaudhari CN. Frozen Red Blood Cells in Transfusion. Med J Armed Forces India. 2009;65(1):55–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Kelly K, Cancelas JA, Szczepiorkowski ZM, Dumont DF, Rugg N, Dumont LJ. Frozen platelets‐development and future directions. Transfus Med Rev. 2020;34(4):286–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Valeri CR, Ragno G, Khuri S. Freezing human platelets with 6 percent dimethyl sulfoxide with removal of the supernatant solution before freezing and storage at −80 degrees C without postthaw processing. Transfusion. 2005;45(12):1890–1898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Reade MC, Marks DC, Howe B, McGuinness S, Parke R, Navarra L, et al. Cryopreserved platelets compared with liquid‐stored platelets for the treatment of surgical bleeding: protocol for two multicentre randomised controlled blinded non‐inferiority trials (the CLIP‐II and CLIPNZ‐II trials). BMJ Open. 2022;12(12):e068933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Cohn CS, Dumont LJ, Lozano M, Marks DC, Johnson L, Ismay S, et al. Vox Sanguinis International Forum on platelet cryopreservation: Summary. Vox Sang. 2017;112(7):684–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Cid J, Escolar G, Galan A, López‐Vilchez I, Molina P, Díaz‐Ricart M, et al. In vitro evaluation of the hemostatic effectiveness of cryopreserved platelets. Transfusion. 2016;56(3):580–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Six KR, Delabie W, Devreese KMJ, Johnson L, Marks DC, Dumont LJ, et al. Comparison between manufacturing sites shows differential adhesion, activation, and GPIbα expression of cryopreserved platelets. Transfusion. 2018;58(11):2645–2656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Six KR, Compernolle V, Feys HB. Platelet biochemistry and morphology after cryopreservation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3):935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Noorman F, van Dongen TTCF, Plat MCJ, Badloe JF, Hess JR, Hoencamp R. Transfusion:‐80 C frozen blood products are safe and effective in military casualty care. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Khuri SF, Healey N, MacGregor H, Barnard MR, Szymanski IO, Birjiniuk V, et al. Comparison of the effects of transfusions of cryopreserved and liquid‐preserved platelets on hemostasis and blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117(1):172–183. discussion 183–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. McGuinness S, Charlewood R, Gilder E, Parke R, Hayes K, Morley S, et al. A pilot randomized clinical trial of cryopreserved versus liquid‐stored platelet transfusion for bleeding in cardiac surgery: the cryopreserved versus liquid platelet‐New Zealand pilot trial. Vox Sang. 2022;117(3):337–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Cellphire Therapeutics Cryopreserved Platelets (CPP) . Cryopreserved Platelets (CPP). [Online] 2025 2025 [cited 2025 August 27, 2025]; Company webpage describing development, clinical studies, and potential applications of cryopreserved platelet product CLPH‐511. https://www.cellphire.com/cryopreserved-platelets-cpp
  • 91. Whitman G, Kramer R, Tanaka K, Holcomb J, Fitzpatrick GM, Raphael J, et al. Design of the Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Dimethyl Sulfoxide Cryopreserved Platelets to liquid stored platelets in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. JTCVS Open. 2023;13:232–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Listcorp . USAISR Successful Phase 1 Blood Platelet Study. ASX Announcement [Online] 2025 April 16, 2025 [cited 2025 August 2, 2025]; Phase 1 Study Collaboration Between USAISR and Vitrafy Showed Platelet Recovery of Around 88–89%, Exceeding Industry Standards. https://www.listcorp.com/asx/vfy/vitrafy‐life‐sciences‐limited/news/usaisr‐successful‐phase‐1‐blood‐platelet‐study‐3178646.html
  • 93. Fernandez‐Moure J, Maisha N, Lavik EB, Cannon JW. The chemistry of lyophilized blood products. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29(7):2150–2160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Mahoney EB. A study of experimental and clinical shock with special reference to its treatment by the intravenous injection of preserved plasma. Ann Surg. 1938;108(2):178–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Zaza M, Kalkwarf K, Holcomb J. Dried Plasma. Damage Control Resuscitation. 2019;6:145–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Medical Supply in World War II.—DTIC Defense Technical Information Center . Medical supply in World War II. [PDF] 1968 [cited 2025 August 27, 2025]; 1st:[Official U.S. Army historical monograph on medical logistics and supply during World War II.]. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB‐D104‐PURL‐gpo87082/pdf/GOVPUB‐D104‐PURL‐gpo87082
  • 97. Polk TM, Gurney JM, Riggs LE, Cannon JW, Cap AP, Friedrichs PA. Dried plasma: An urgent priority for trauma readiness. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95(2S Suppl 1):S4–s6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Sailliol A, Martinaud C, Cap AP, Civadier C, Clavier B, Deshayes A‐V, et al. The evolving role of lyophilized plasma in remote damage control resuscitation in the French Armed Forces Health Service. Transfusion. 2013;53(Suppl 1):65s–71s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Pusateri AE, Given MB, Schreiber MA, Spinella PC, Pati S, Kozar RA, et al. Dried plasma: state of the science and recent developments. Transfusion. 2016;56(Suppl 2):S128–S139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Martinaud C, Ausset S, Deshayes AV, Cauet A, Demazeau N, Sailliol A. Use of freeze‐dried plasma in French intensive care unit in Afghanistan. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1761–1764. discussion 1764–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Benov A, Glassberg E, Baruch EN, Avi S, Gilad T, Moran L, et al. Augmentation of point of injury care: Reducing battlefield mortality‐The IDF experience. Injury. 2016;47(5):993–1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Shlaifer A, Siman‐Tov M, Radomislensky I, Peleg K, Shina A, Baruch EN, et al. Prehospital administration of freeze‐dried plasma, is it the solution for trauma casualties? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(4):675–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Cuenca CM, Chamy G, Schauer SG. Freeze Dried Plasma Administration Within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry. J Spec Oper Med. 2020;20(1):43–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Galvan S. U.S., French Armies Join Forces to Expand Freeze‐Dried Plasma. [Online] 2015 March 31, 2015 [cited 2025 27 August 2025]; Military collaboration on transfusion medicine. https://www.jbsa.mil/News/News/Article/598873/us-french-armies-join-forces-to-expand-freeze-dried-plasma/
  • 105. Pusateri AE, Malloy WW, Sauer D, Benov A, Corley JB, Rambharose S, et al. Use of dried plasma in prehospital and austere environments. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(2):327–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Mok G, Hoang R, Khan MW, Pannell D, Peng H, Tien H, et al. Freeze‐dried plasma for major trauma—Systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;90(3):589–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Peng HT, Singh K, Rhind SG, da Luz L, Beckett A. Dried Plasma for Major Trauma: Past, Present, and Future. Life (Basel). 2024;14(5):619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Heger A, Svae TE, Neisser‐Svae A, Jordan S, Behizad M, Römisch J. Biochemical quality of the pharmaceutically licensed plasma OctaplasLG after implementation of a novel prion protein (PrPSc) removal technology and reduction of the solvent/detergent (S/D) process time. Vox Sang. 2009;97(3):219–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Administration, U.S.F.a.D. , Authorization of Emergency Use of a Freeze‐Dried Plasma Product for Treatment of Hemorrhage or Coagulopathy During an Emergency Involving Agents of Military Combat, D.o.H.a.H. Services, Editor. 2024, Federal Register: Washington, DC. p. 68625–68630.
  • 110. Spinella PC, Frazier E, Pidcoke HF, Dietzen DJ, Pati S, Gorkun O, et al. All plasma products are not created equal: Characterizing differences between plasma products. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(6 Suppl 1):S18–S25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Booth GS, Lozier JN, Nghiem K, Clibourn D, Klein HG, Flegel WA. Spray: single‐donor plasma product for room temperature storage. Transfusion. 2012;52(4):828–833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Shuja F, Finkelstein RA, Fukudome E, Duggan M, Kheirbek T, Hamwi K, et al. Development and testing of low‐volume hyperoncotic, hyperosmotic spray‐dried plasma for the treatment of trauma‐associated coagulopathy. J Trauma. 2011;70(3):664–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Ehn K, Skallsjö G, Romlin B, Sandström G, Sandgren P, Wikman A. An experimental comparison and user evaluation of three different dried plasma products. Vox Sang. 2025;120:1058–1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Liu QP, Carney R, Sohn J, Sundaram S, Fell MA. Single‐donor spray‐dried plasma. Transfusion. 2019;59(2):707–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Cap AP, Buckley L, Popovsky MA, Fell MA, Sohn J. Characterization and Stability of Spray Dried Plasma Manufactured with the Frontlineodp™ System. Blood. 2024;144:2645. [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Newswire P. Velico Medical Begins Clinical Trial on Spray‐Dried Plasma. 2024 [cited 2024 October 27, 2024]. Available from: https://www.prnewswire.com/news‐releases/velico‐medical‐begins‐clinical‐trial‐on‐spray‐dried‐plasma‐301875894.html
  • 117. Pusateri AE, Given MB, Macdonald VW, Homer MJ. Comprehensive US government program for dried plasma development. Transfusion. 2016;56(Suppl 1):S16–S23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Bynum JA, Meledeo MA, Peltier GC, McIntosh CS, Taylor AS, Montgomery RK, et al. Evaluation of a lyophilized platelet‐derived hemostatic product. Transfusion. 2019;59(S2):1490–1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Kuhn BJ, Swanson A, Cherupalla AS, Booth L, Dickerson WM, Fitzpatrick GM, et al. Mechanisms of action of an investigational new freeze‐dried platelet‐derived hemostatic product. J Thromb Haemost. 2024;22(3):686–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Ohanian M, Cancelas JA, Davenport R, Pullarkat V, Hervig T, Broome C, et al. Freeze‐dried platelets are a promising alternative in bleeding thrombocytopenic patients with hematological malignancies. Am J Hematol. 2022;97(3):256–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Cellphire . Thrombosomes: a platelet‐based freeze‐dried hemostatic. 2024. https://www.cellphire.com/thrombosomes-a-platelet-based-freeze-dried-hemostatic
  • 122. Goodrich RP, Sowemimo‐Coker SO, Zerez CR, Tanaka KR. Preservation of metabolic activity in lyophilized human erythrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(3):967–971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Cliff RO, Ligler F, Goins B, Hoffmann PM, Spielberg H, Rudolph AS. Liposome encapsulated hemoglobin: long‐term storage stability and in vivo characterization. Biomater Artif Cell Immobil Biotechnol. 1992;20(2–4):619–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Han Y, Quan GB, Liu XZ, Ma EP, Liu A, Jin P, et al. Improved preservation of human red blood cells by lyophilization. Cryobiology. 2005;51(2):152–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Zhang M, Oldenhof H, Sydykov B, Bigalk J, Sieme H, Wolkers WF. Freeze‐drying of mammalian cells using trehalose: preservation of DNA integrity. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Kheirolomoom A, Satpathy GR, Török Z, Banerjee M, Bali R, Novaes RC, et al. Phospholipid vesicles increase the survival of freeze‐dried human red blood cells. Cryobiology. 2005;51(3):290–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Cryopharm . Freeze‐dried Human Red Blood Cells. [Online PDF] 1991 July 12, 1991 [cited 2025 August 27, 2025]; Technical report analyzing blood transfusion support, product utilization, logistics, and challenges during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA238431
  • 128. Elder CA, Moore J, Janis BR, Shacklette S, Jones C, Cantrell R, et al. Rehydration outcomes for freeze‐dried red blood cells in reduced gravity. Acta Astronaut. 2024;214:64–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Janis BR, Priddy MC, Otto MR, Kopechek JA, Menze MA. Sonoporation enables high‐throughput loading of trehalose into red blood cells. Cryobiology. 2021;98:73–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Zhu K, Wang L, Xiao Y, Zhang X, You G, Chen Y, et al. Nanomaterial‐related hemoglobin‐based oxygen carriers, with emphasis on liposome and nano‐capsules, for biomedical applications: current status and future perspectives. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Pan D, Rogers S, Misra S, Vulugundam G, Gazdzinski L, Tsui A, et al. Erythromer (EM), a Nanoscale Bio‐Synthetic Artificial Red Cell: Proof of Concept and In Vivo Efficacy Results. Blood. 2016;128(22):1027.27563145 [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Hickman DA, Pawlowski CL, Shevitz A, Luc NF, Kim A, Girish A, et al. Intravenous synthetic platelet (SynthoPlate) nanoconstructs reduce bleeding and improve ‘golden hour’ survival in a porcine model of traumatic arterial hemorrhage. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Torres CM, Kent A, Scantling D, Joseph B, Haut ER, Sakran JV. Association of Whole Blood With Survival Among Patients Presenting With Severe Hemorrhage in US and Canadian Adult Civilian Trauma Centers. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(5):532–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration . Guidance for Industry: Quality Systems Approach to Pharmaceutical Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Braverman MA, Smith A, Pokorny D, Axtman B, Shahan CP, Barry L, et al. Prehospital whole blood reduces early mortality in patients with hemorrhagic shock. Transfusion. 2021;61(Suppl 1):S15–s21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Torres CM, Kenzik KM, Saillant NN, Scantling DR, Sanchez SE, Brahmbhatt TS, et al. Timing to First Whole Blood Transfusion and Survival Following Severe Hemorrhage in Trauma Patients. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(4):374–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Flegel WA, Natanson C, Klein HG. Does prolonged storage of red blood cells cause harm? Br J Haematol. 2014;165(1):3–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Gammon R, Becker J, Cameron T, Eichbaum Q, Jindal A, Lamba DS, et al. How do I manage a blood product shortage? Transfusion. 2023;63(12):2205–2213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Jacobs JW, Karafin MS, Allen ES, Abels E, Park YA, Stephens LD, et al. Blood conservation strategies at United States hospitals during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Findings from a multi‐institutional analysis—International Society of Blood Transfusion survey. Transfusion. 2022;62(11):2271–2281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Riley BC, Phuong J, Hasan RA, Stansbury LG, Hess JR, Roubik DJ. Expired blood transfusion and mortality outcomes in combat trauma patients. Transfusion. 2024;64(9):1683–1691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Shander A, Hofmann A, Gombotz H, Theusinger OM, Spahn DR. Estimating the cost of blood: past, present, and future directions. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2007;21(2):271–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Klein HG, Hrouda JC, Epstein JS. Crisis in the sustainability of the U.S. blood system. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(15):1485–1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. U.S. Department of Defense . DoD Instruction 6480.04: Armed Services Blood Program. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense; 2023. p. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Moroff G, Dende D. Characterization of biochemical changes occurring during storage of red cells. Comparative studies with CPD and CPDA‐1 anticoagulant‐preservative solutions. Transfusion. 1983;23(6):484–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Rock G, Haddad SA, Poon AO, Romans RA, Sparling CR, Louis P, et al. Reduction of plasma volume after storage of platelets in CP2D. Transfusion. 1998;38(3):242–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Tran LNT, González‐Fernández C, Gomez‐Pastora J. Impact of Different Red Blood Cell Storage Solutions and Conditions on Cell Function and Viability: A Systematic Review. Biomolecules. 2024;14(7):813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Sparrow RL. Time to revisit red blood cell additive solutions and storage conditions: a role for “omics” analyses. Blood Transfus. 2012;10(Suppl 2):s7–s11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. D'Amici GM, Mirasole C, D'Alessandro A, Yoshida T, Dumont LJ, Zolla L. Red blood cell storage in SAGM and AS3: a comparison through the membrane two‐dimensional electrophoresis proteome. Blood Transfus. 2012;10(Suppl 2):s46–s54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Radwanski K, Thill M, Min K. Red cell storage in E‐Sol 5 and Adsol additive solutions: paired comparison using mixed and non‐mixed study designs. Vox Sang. 2014;106(4):322–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. D'Alessandro A, Hansen KC, Silliman CC, Moore EE, Kelher M, Banerjee A. Metabolomics of AS‐5 RBC supernatants following routine storage. Vox Sang. 2015;108(2):131–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Jain R, Jarosz C. Safety and efficacy of AS‐1 red blood cell use in neonates. Transfus Apher Sci. 2001;24(2):111–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Thomas KA, Srinivasan AJ, McIntosh C, Rahn K, Kelly S, McGough L, et al. Comparison of platelet quality and function across apheresis collection platforms. Transfusion. 2023;63(Suppl 3):S146–s158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Transfusion are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES