Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy often preceded by infection. We report the case of a 49-year-old man presenting with subacute, progressive, symmetric ascending weakness involving the lower and distal upper extremities, ultimately diagnosed with GBS, triggered by human coronavirus 229E infection. The patient was managed with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and close respiratory monitoring in a stepdown unit without progression to respiratory failure or need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. This case highlights diagnostic considerations, the role of electrophysiologic testing, and ICU triage decision-making in suspected GBS.
Keywords: coronavirus‑associated neurologic complications, guillain-barré syndrome, human coronavirus 229e, neuromuscular weakness, peripheral nerve demyelination
Introduction
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) most commonly presents with rapidly progressive, symmetric weakness accompanied by hyporeflexia or areflexia, with variable sensory and autonomic involvement. Antecedent infections are well‑established triggers. Although GBS associated with SARS‑CoV‑2 has been increasingly reported, less attention has been directed toward non‑SARS seasonal coronaviruses. Close monitoring for respiratory compromise is essential, as up to 30% of patients require ventilatory support [1]. Consequently, early recognition and vigilant observation for respiratory decline are critical. This case highlights the development of GBS following human coronavirus 229E (HCoV‑229E) infection and illustrates management guided by clinical and physiologic assessment without the need for ICU admission.
Case presentation
A 49‑year‑old male with a history of untreated hypertension presented with progressive bilateral lower‑extremity weakness. He had been in his usual state of health until January 2026, when he developed heaviness and weakness in both feet. Symptoms progressed proximally over 48 hours, leading to difficulty ambulating. The following day, he noted distal upper‑extremity involvement affecting both hands, impairing fine motor tasks and driving.
He denied pain, paresthesias, sensory loss, bowel or bladder dysfunction, fever, chills, recent gastrointestinal illness, or respiratory symptoms. He reported receiving influenza and COVID‑19 vaccinations approximately three months prior. He initially presented to an outside emergency department and was discharged after basic laboratory evaluation. Continued progression prompted outpatient neurology evaluation, where electromyography (EMG) demonstrated absent bilateral peroneal and tibial motor responses with acute denervation in the lower extremities and paraspinal muscles. He was referred to University Hospital of Brooklyn for further evaluation of suspected GBS.
On admission, he was afebrile and hemodynamically stable, blood pressure was initially 176/101 mmHg and improved to 149/92 mmHg without intervention. His heart rate was 89 bpm, respiratory rate 18 breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation 98% on room air. He was alert and oriented without distress. Cardiopulmonary examination was unremarkable. Neurologic examination showed intact mental status and cranial nerves. Motor testing revealed distal‑predominant weakness in the upper extremities (shoulders 4+/5, wrists 4/5, fingers 3/5) and severe distal weakness in the lower extremities (ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion 0/5) with relatively preserved proximal strength (hips and knees 4+/5). Reflexes were diffusely diminished to absent, including absent ankle reflexes and reduced patellar responses. Sensation to light touch, pinprick, and temperature was intact. Coordination was preserved, though he was unable to ambulate independently.
Laboratory evaluation showed mild hyperkalemia (peak 5.8 mmol/L) without electrocardiographic changes, which resolved with treatment. Complete blood count and renal function were within normal limits. Creatine kinase was mildly elevated (peak 327 U/L), and inflammatory markers were increased (ESR 55 mm/hr, CRP 5.7 mg/L) (Table 1). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis demonstrated albuminocytologic dissociation, with mildly elevated protein (44 mg/dL), 0 WBCs, normal glucose, and negative Gram stain and cultures (Table 2). Given the electrodiagnostic findings from the outside facility, there was concern for an acute motor axonal neuropathy variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome. MRI of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine with contrast showed lumbar nerve root enhancement without compressive or structural pathology (Figures 1, 2). Respiratory viral molecular testing was positive for human coronavirus 229E, while SARS‑CoV‑2 and other respiratory pathogens were not detected (Table 3). Serial respiratory assessments demonstrated preserved pulmonary mechanics, with negative inspiratory force consistently greater than -40 cm H₂O and vital capacity approximately 3.27 L.
Table 1. Admission Laboratory Studies (Complete Blood Count and Comprehensive Metabolic Panel).
BUN - Blood Urea Nitrogen, AST - Aspartate Aminotransferase, ALT - Alanine Aminotransferase, ESR - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, CRP - C‑Reactive Protein, WBC - White Blood Cell count
| Test | Result | Reference Range |
| Sodium | 140 mmol/L | 135-145 |
| Potassium | 5.8 mmol/L (resolved to 4.4) | 3.5-5.0 |
| Chloride | 107 mmol/L | 98-107 |
| CO₂ (Bicarbonate) | 24 mmol/L | 22-29 |
| BUN | 11.1 mg/dL | 7-20 |
| Creatinine | 0.70 mg/dL | 0.6-1.3 |
| Glucose | 99 mg/dL | 70-110 |
| AST | 50 U/L | 10-40 |
| ALT | 38 U/L | 7-56 |
| Alkaline Phosphatase | 51 U/L | 44-147 |
| Total Bilirubin | 0.7 mg/dL | 0.1-1.2 |
| Albumin | 5.3 g/dL | 3.5-5.0 |
| Creatine Kinase | 327 U/L | 30-200 |
| ESR | 55 mm/hr | <20 |
| CRP | 5.7 mg/L | <3 |
| WBC | 7.13 ×10³/µL | 4.0-11.0 |
| Hemoglobin | 15.8 g/dL | 13.5-17.5 |
| Platelets | 257 ×10³/µL | 150-400 |
Table 2. Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Analysis.
RBC - Red Blood Cells, WBC - White Blood Cells
| Parameter | Result | Reference Range |
| Appearance | Clear, colorless | Clear |
| WBC | 0 cells/µL | 0-5 |
| RBC | 0 cells/µL | 0 |
| Protein | 44 mg/dL | 15-40 |
| Glucose | 66 mg/dL | 40-70 |
| Gram Stain | No organisms detected | - |
| Culture | No growth | - |
Table 3. Respiratory Viral Panel (Molecular Testing).
| Pathogen | Result |
| Coronavirus 229E | Detected |
| Coronavirus HKU1 | Not detected |
| Coronavirus NL63 | Not detected |
| Coronavirus OC43 | Not detected |
| SARS-CoV-2 RNA | Not detected |
| Influenza A | Not detected |
| Influenza B | Not detected |
| Respiratory Syncytial Virus | Not detected |
| Parainfluenza 1 | Not detected |
| Parainfluenza 2 | Not detected |
| Parainfluenza 3 | Not detected |
| Parainfluenza 4 | Not detected |
| Adenovirus | Not detected |
| Human Metapneumovirus | Not detected |
| Bordetella pertussis | Not detected |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae | Not detected |
| Chlamydia pneumoniae | Not detected |
Figure 1. Lumbar spine MRI demonstrating normal alignment without evidence of neural compression, bone fracture, or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (yellow arrow).
S in the picture represents sagittal plane.
Figure 2. Spine MRI (T1 weighted post contrast with fat suppression) showing symmetrical bilateral nerve root enhancement (arrow).
A in the figure represents axial plane.
Given the classic clinical presentation, electrophysiologic findings, and supportive cerebrospinal fluid profile, the patient was diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome, with concern for an acute motor axonal neuropathy variant. He was evaluated by neurology and the medical ICU teams. In accordance with standard ICU admission and triage principles, his preserved respiratory function, stable hemodynamics, absence of bulbar symptoms, and reassuring pulmonary mechanics supported admission to a step-down unit rather than ICU‑level care [1]. He was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (0.4 g/kg/day for five days) and underwent serial monitoring of negative inspiratory force and vital capacity. Supportive care included physical and occupational therapy, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis with subcutaneous heparin, management of hypertension, and correction of hyperkalemia with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate. Throughout hospitalization, he remained hemodynamically stable and did not develop respiratory failure or autonomic instability. Weakness stabilized with mild improvement in proximal strength, although significant distal lower‑extremity weakness persisted. After completion of immunotherapy and clinical stabilization, he was transferred to acute inpatient rehabilitation for continued motor recovery.
Discussion
GBS is an acute autoimmune neuropathy characterized by immune‑mediated injury to the peripheral nerves, leading to rapidly progressive symptoms such as paresthesias, muscle weakness, and, in severe cases, paralysis requiring close respiratory monitoring or intensive care support [1]. Although its precise cause remains unclear, the disorder is widely understood to result from aberrant immune activation following antecedent respiratory or gastrointestinal infection, with molecular mimicry between microbial antigens and peripheral nerve components believed to play a central role [1-4].
HCoV‑229E is an endemic alphacoronavirus that typically produces self‑limited upper respiratory tract symptoms. Despite its high prevalence - accounting for up to 15-20% of common cold presentations - neurologic complications are, to our knowledge, rarely reported. While GBS has been associated with several viral infections, including Epstein-Barr virus, HIV, and SARS‑CoV‑2, its occurrence following HCoV‑229E infection is uncommon, with only limited reports suggesting such a link [5-7].
First isolated in 1966, HCoV‑229E is thought to originate from African hipposiderid bats, with camelids serving as intermediate hosts. Its evolutionary history shares features with that of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Although infection typically causes mild upper respiratory symptoms in healthy adults, young children, older adults, and immunocompromised individuals may develop severe lower respiratory tract disease. The virus has also been isolated in neural cells, raising the possibility of neurotropism; a preceding infectious trigger remains clinically meaningful. Establishing a temporal association supports the post‑infectious immune hypothesis and helps distinguish GBS from other immune‑mediated neuropathies, such as multiple sclerosis and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), which follow different clinical courses and may require alternative management strategies [5,6].
This case also emphasizes that diagnosis alone should not determine level of care. Although up to 30% of patients with GBS require mechanical ventilation, respiratory decline is best predicted by objective physiologic parameters rather than diagnostic category [1]. Despite marked distal weakness and electrophysiologic findings concerning an axonal variant, the patient maintained stable pulmonary mechanics, with preserved negative inspiratory force and vital capacity throughout hospitalization. Admission to an intermediate‑care setting allowed appropriate monitoring without unnecessary escalation to intensive care, supporting efficient use of critical care resources while maintaining patient safety.
Taken together, this case demonstrated two clinically relevant themes: the potential for seasonal coronaviruses such as HCoV‑229E to act as immunologic triggers for GBS, and the importance of physiologically guided triage in the management of acute neuromuscular weakness [8,9]. Further investigation is needed to clarify the incidence and mechanisms of coronavirus‑associated peripheral neuropathies beyond SARS‑CoV‑2.
Conclusions
We report a case of Guillain-Barré syndrome following human coronavirus 229E infection that was successfully managed with intravenous immunoglobulin and careful physiologic monitoring without the need for intensive care admission. This case underscores the importance of early recognition, diagnostic confirmation, vigilant respiratory assessment, and evidence-based triage in patients with suspected GBS. It further highlights the value of evidence-based, physiology-driven triage in guiding level-of-care decisions while maintaining patient safety.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Departments of Neurology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation for their involvement in this patient’s care.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Goitom Weldearegay, Tigran Aghabekyan, Ali Arif, Jerome Salvani
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Goitom Weldearegay, Tigran Aghabekyan, Ali Arif, Jerome Salvani
Drafting of the manuscript: Goitom Weldearegay, Tigran Aghabekyan, Ali Arif, Jerome Salvani
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Goitom Weldearegay, Tigran Aghabekyan, Ali Arif, Jerome Salvani
Supervision: Jerome Salvani
References
- 1.ICU admission, discharge, and triage guidelines: a framework to enhance clinical operations, development of institutional policies, and further research. Nates JL, Nunnally M, Kleinpell R, et al. https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2016&issue=08000&article=00015&type=Fulltext. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1553–1602. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Case report: Guillain-Barré syndrome with three episodes and literature review. Wang Y, Zhao C, Chen R, et al. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1559937. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1559937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.A Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS): a case report. Timerga S, Befkadu A. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586820308821. Int J Emerg Med. 2025;18:164. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00937-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guillain‑Barré syndrome. 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/guillain-barr%C3%A9-syndrome https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/guillain-barr%C3%A9-syndrome
- 5.Guillain‑Barré syndrome (GBS) 2026. https://emcrit.org/ibcc/gbs/ https://emcrit.org/ibcc/gbs/
- 6.Coronavirus 229E: a common human coronavirus. 2025. https://biologyinsights.com/coronavirus-229e-a-common-human-coronavirus/ https://biologyinsights.com/coronavirus-229e-a-common-human-coronavirus/
- 7.Human coronavirus 229E. 2026. https://openaccesspub.org/international-journal-of-coronaviruses/human-coronavirus-229e https://openaccesspub.org/international-journal-of-coronaviruses/human-coronavirus-229e
- 8.Human coronavirus-229E, -OC43, -NL63, and -HKU1 (Coronaviridae) Liu DX, Liang JQ, Fung TS. Encycl Virol. 2021:428–440. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Predicting outcome in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: international validation of the modified Erasmus GBS outcome score. Doets AY, Lingsma HF, Walgaard C, et al. Neurology. 2022;98:0–32. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


