Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2026 Feb 18;80(5):449–457. doi: 10.1038/s41430-026-01707-4

Body mass index and activities of daily living impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis

Md Razib Mamun 1,2, Hanson Gabriel Nuamah 1, Young-Jae Hong 1, Zean Song 1, Tahmina Akter 1, Yuko Yoshida 1, Yoshihisa Nakano 1, KM Saif-Ur-Rahman 3,4, Hiroshi Yatsuya 1,✉, Rei Otsuka 5
PMCID: PMC13186705  PMID: 41708966

Abstract

Both underweight and obesity have been linked to increased risk of disability, yet evidence on the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and activities of daily living (ADL) impairment remains inconsistent. To examine these associations in adults, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis following the standard methods and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Six databases were searched from inception to August 12, 2024. The protocol is registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42022357046). Abstracts and full-text articles describing associations between BMI and ADL impairment were screened using Rayyan software. Study quality was assessed using the RoBANS tool. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed using metaanalysisonline, a web-based meta-analytic platform, with BMI categories of <18.5 (underweight), 25–29.9 (overweight), and ≥30 (obese) as exposures, and 18.5–24.9 (normal) as the reference. Of the initial 25,212 articles identified, 132 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed positive association in both longitudinal studies [odds ratio (OR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.54–2.03] and cross-sectional studies (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.38–1.76). Overweight individuals exhibited a moderate increase in ADL risk in longitudinal studies (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09–1.30), but not in cross-sectional studies (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95–1.18). Both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies revealed a positive association between underweight participants and ADL impairment (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02–1.42; OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.24–1.72, respectively). Individuals with higher BMI, as well as those who are underweight, are at increased risk of ADL limitations.

Subject terms: Risk factors, Geriatrics, Nutrition, Weight management, Lifestyle modification

Introduction

Functional disability refers to a reduced ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), which can lead to significant adverse health outcomes. As of 2021, an estimated 1.3 billion individuals, representing 16% of the global population, were living with a significant disability [1]. Although the increase in global life expectancy has contributed to this high proportion, the disease burden has remained constant from 1990 to 2019 [2]. While obesity or underweight status being key risk factors for disability in older people, reports on desirable body mass index (BMI) ranges have been inconsistent [3–6].

ADLs are commonly used to quantify the level of functional impairment. They are assessed using several standardized tools, most commonly the Katz Index and the Barthel Index. The Katz Index evaluates six basic functions, while the Barthel Index assesses ten self-care and mobility tasks. There are other assessments, including Japan’s Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) certification for need of care, the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS), the Korean Activities of Daily Living (K-ADL), and Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS).

Existing studies evaluating the association between BMI and ADL impairment have also yielded inconsistent results. Studies have identified a positive association [7], an inverse association [8], and no association [9] between underweight BMI and ADL. Similarly, for overweight BMI, both a direct association [10], a negative association [11], and no association [12] with ADL have been reported. Despite these varying findings, no systematic review or meta-analysis including both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies in adults (aged 18 years and above) has yet been conducted. Such a study would yield robust results, enhance statistical power, and uncover relationships that might not be evident in individual studies. Furthermore, the findings may substantiate the need to shift health promotion strategies from their prior focus on preventing obesity in middle age, towards a comprehensive approach that emphasizes maintaining a healthy BMI throughout one’s life.

In the present report, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between BMI and ADL impairment among adults, thereby identifying the optimal BMI range for maximizing disability-free lifespan in adulthood.

Methods

Registration and search strategy

We carried out this systematic review and meta-analysis using standardized methods and adhered to the reporting requirements of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines [13]. The protocol was pre-registered before the systematic review commenced in the PROSPERO (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022357046).

The search strategy was developed and executed by MRM through discussion with the content experts [HY, KMSUR, and RO] and review teams. Keywords and medical subject heading (Mesh) terms were combined using Boolean operators. The comprehensive search strategy developed for PubMed has been provided in Supplementary Text S1. We conducted search in PubMed, Web of Science (core collection), Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and ICHUSHI (Japanese database). The search was initially conducted from inception to September 27, 2022, and updated on August 12, 2024.

Eligibility criteria

Studies were selected in compliance with the following inclusion criteria:

Any article describing the association between BMI and functional disability in relation to the ADLs was included. There was no time limit for the study period. Articles published in English, Japanese and Chinese were considered only. No geographic restriction was applied. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental trial studies, case-control studies, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and comparative cross-sectional studies were considered. Articles only published in peer-reviewed journals were considered.

We excluded articles for the following exclusion criteria:

  • Articles not describing the association between BMI and functional disability in relation to the ADL.

  • Study participants were below 18 years.

  • Articles published in languages other than English, Japanese or Chinese.

  • Qualitative study, case report, review, systematic review, scoping review, editorial, commentary, book chapter, view paper/opinion paper, letter to editor, and conference abstract were excluded.

Data collection and analysis

Software

We used Rayan software [14] for the deduplication and screening of title/abstract and full texts. We used Rayyan solely for the screening process. No AI-assisted screening or automated tools within Rayyan were employed for either title/abstract or full-text screening. All screening decisions were made by the reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed using metaanalysisonline, a web-based meta-analytic platform.

Screening

The screening of citations was conducted in two phases. After removing duplicates, two review authors [GN and TA] independently screened the titles and abstracts of the citations to determine eligibility. Any disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third review author [HY]. Two independent review authors [MRM and ZS] screened full-text articles, and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third review author [HY]. Articles obtained from the ICHUSHI (Japanese database) were independently screened by two Japanese review authors [YH and YY], and any disagreements were resolved by a third review author [YN] during both the title/abstract and full-text screening phases. No formal inter-rater reliability statistics were calculated, as consensus resolution was used to finalize inclusion decisions.

Data extraction

Two review authors [GN and TA] independently conducted data extraction using a pre-defined template. Any disagreements were discussed and subsequently resolved in consultation with a third reviewer [HY]. The extracted data included publication year, author name, types of study, sample size, BMI category, ADL assessment methods, and outcomes.

Risk of bias assessment

No randomized controlled trials were included in this review. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the RoBANS tool [15]. The RoBANS tool consists of six domains: selection of participants, confounding variables, measurement of exposure, blinding of outcome assessments, incomplete outcome data, and selective outcome reporting. Each domain was classified as low, high, or unclear risk. Two review authors (MRM and ZS) independently assessed the quality of the included studies, and any disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer (KMSUR). Risk of bias assessment of included Japanese studies was performed independently by two Japanese review authors (YH and YY) and resolved discrepancies through discussion with a third review author (YN).

Data synthesis

We performed meta-analysis on the effect of BMI on ADL impairment. Meta-analysis was performed using metaanalysisonline, a web-based meta-analytic platform based on inverse-variance weighting of log-transformed effect sizes. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis considering the heterogeneity. Between-study variance (τ²) was estimated using the platform’s default estimator (DerSimonian–Laird, DL). Results were presented as pooled OR/HR with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and I2 statistic. Based on the risk of bias assessment, studies rated as high risk were excluded from all meta-analyses. In the meta-analysis, the normal BMI category (BMI 18.5–24.9) served as the reference group, and comparisons with other BMI categories were analyzed separately. We conducted separate meta-analyses for BMI categories indicating underweight, overweight and obesity. Specifically, in studies that used multiple exposure categories (e.g., underweight, overweight, and obesity), we extracted and included all relevant estimates in the meta-analysis. For example, we extracted the ORs for ADL impairment comparing underweight (BMI < 18.5) overweight (BMI 25–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30) with normal weight, respectively, and incorporated each estimate into the separate analyses.

Due to heterogeneity in ADL assessments, the meta-analyses were conducted stratified by the ADL assessment methods. For studies using the Katz Index, we conducted separate meta-analyses for different BMI categories where BMI cut-offs were comparable. Studies using various ADL assessments, including the Katz Index, Barthel Index, and others, were combined in separate meta-analyses for different BMI categories under the approach described as ‘irrespective of ADL measurement method,’ where BMI cut-offs were comparable. Separate meta-analyses were performed for separate effect estimates. Subgroup analyses were conducted with the following subgroups: study regions (Europe, North America, Asia, Australia, Africa); and measurement method of ADL. A narrative synthesis was performed for the rest of the included studies. We also conducted subgroup analyses by study design.

Results

Literature search

The study selection process is presented in the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram (Fig. 1). We initially identified 25,212 articles, and after deduplication, title and abstract screening, and full-text screening, 132 studies were included in this systematic review.

Fig. 1. PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Flow diagram illustrating the identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and inclusion of studies.

Characteristics of studies (study design, location, age group)

Details and characteristics of studies are described in Supplementary Table S1. Out of 132 studies, 77 were longitudinal studies and 55 were cross-sectional studies. Majority of the studies were from USA (n = 34) and Japan (n = 22). Our review also included studies were from Australia, Bangladesh, Brazil, China, England, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey. Heterogeneous age groups were considered for inclusion in included studies ranges from ≥18 years to ≥90 years (Supplementary Table S1). The majority of the studies included participants who were 65 years of age and above.

BMI categories used in included studies

The BMI cut-off values differed greatly across studies, with a range from <18.5 kg/m2 to ≥40 kg/m2. Our meta-analysis was conducted based on the BMI categories reported in each study. Additionally, the reference group used in the included studies varied substantially. The presence of multiple BMI cut-off values and reference groups caused considerable challenges in conducting the meta-analysis.

Assessment of ADL in included studies

In the included studies, various methods for assessing ADL impairment were identified. Katz Index was used in thirty-three studies. Five studies used modified Katz Index. Eighteen studies used Barthel index. Six studies used LTCI. Namely, LTCI certification of need of care was defined as LTCI-ADL impairment in these studies. Forty-six studies did not specify scale or checklist name used in assessing ADL, but they did mention the questions they asked instead. Other studies used multiple scales and checklists including the GARS, K-ADL, RAI-MDS-ADL long-form scale, Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, Modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, Brazilian Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire, Brazilian Portuguese version of the Kihon Checklist (KCL), SAGE, Physical self-maintenance scale (PSMS).

Risk of bias in included studies

We assessed the risk of bias in all included studies, with detailed findings presented in Supplementary Table S2. Most studies exhibited a low risk of bias in participant selection, except for ten studies which had a high risk due to small sample size. In the domain of confounding variables, seven studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias, while the majority were considered low risk. For the measurement of exposure, four studies were rated as high risk due to reliance on self-reported data, and seven studies had unclear risk due to insufficient reporting. The blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, and selective outcome reporting domains were assessed as a low risk of bias for all studies.

Obese group (BMI ≥ 30) and ADL impairment

Figure 2A shows the pooled OR for the association between the obese group (BMI ≥ 30) and ADL impairment measured by Katz Index. Combined results through the random-effects model revealed that obesity (BMI ≥ 30) had a higher risk of ADL impairment (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.54–2.02). Cross-sectional studies showed a pooled OR of 1.61 (95% CI: 1.23–2.10), while longitudinal studies showed a pooled OR of 1.85 (95% CI: 1.58–2.16). Figure 2B shows pooled OR for the association between the obese group (BMI ≥ 30) and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods). The random-effects meta-analysis showed that obesity (BMI ≥ 30) was associated with a higher risk of ADL impairment (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.52–1.84). Cross-sectional studies showed a pooled OR of 1.56 (95% CI: 1.38–1.76), while longitudinal studies showed a pooled OR of 1.77 (95% CI: 1.54–2.03).

Fig. 2. Association between the obese group (BMI ≥ 30) and ADL impairment, in comparison to the normal-weight group.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

A Individual and pooled odds ratios for the association between the obese group and ADL impairment measured by Katz Index. B Individual and pooled odds ratios for the association between the obese group and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods).

Overweight group (BMI 25–29.9 and BMI ≥ 25) and ADL impairment

Figure 3A shows the pooled OR for the association between the overweight group (BMI 25–29.9) and ADL impairment measured by Katz Index. Combined results through the random-effects model revealed that the overweight group had a higher risk of ADL impairment (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.10–1.29). Cross-sectional studies showed a pooled OR of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.95–1.18), while longitudinal studies demonstrated a higher pooled OR of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.15–1.39). Figure 3B shows pooled OR for the association the overweight group (BMI 25–29.9) and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods). Pooled analysis shows increased risk of ADL impairment (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07–1.22). Pooled analysis in cross-sectional studies shows OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95–1.18, while longitudinal studies demonstrated a higher pooled OR of 1.19 (95% CI: 1.09–1.30).

Fig. 3. Association between the overweight group (BMI 25–29.9) and ADL impairment, in comparison to the normal-weight group.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

A Individual and pooled odds ratios for the association between the overweight group and ADL impairment measured by Katz Index. B Individual and pooled odds ratios for the association between the overweight group and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods).

Underweight group (BMI < 18.5) and ADL impairment

Figure 4A shows the pooled OR of the association between the underweight group (BMI < 18.5) and ADL impairment measured by the Katz Index, with a pooled OR of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.89–1.34). Cross-sectional studies showed a pooled OR of 1.31 (95% CI: 0.99–1.73), while longitudinal studies demonstrated a pooled OR of 1.02 (95% CI: 0.80–1.31). Figure 4B shows pooled OR for the association between the underweight group (BMI < 18.5) and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods). Pooled analysis shows increased risk of ADL impairment (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19–1.49). Pooled analysis in cross-sectional studies shows OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.24–1.72, while longitudinal studies demonstrated pooled OR of 1.20 (95% CI: 1.02–1.42). Figure 4C, D show pooled HR for the association between BMI < 18.5 and ADL impairment in longitudinal studies, measured by LTCI (HR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00–1.66) and irrespective of measurement method (HR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.14–1.47), respectively.

Fig. 4. Association between the underweight group (BMI < 18.5) and ADL impairment, in comparison to the normal-weight group.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

A Individual and pooled odds ratios for the association between the underweight group and ADL impairment measured by Katz Index. B Individual and pooled odds ratios for the association between the underweight group and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods). C Individual and pooled hazard ratios for the association between the underweight group and ADL impairment measured by LTCI in longitudinal studies. D Individual and pooled hazard ratios for the association between the underweight group and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods) in longitudinal studies.

Obese group (BMI 30–<35 and BMI > 35) and ADL impairment

Pooled OR for the association between the BMI 30–<35 group and ADL (irrespective of ADL measurement methods) in longitudinal studies shows higher risk of ADL impairment (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.28–1.87) (Fig. 5A). Pooled OR for the association between the BMI > 35 group and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods) in longitudinal studies shows heightened risk of ADL impairment (OR: 2.44, 95% CI: 2.03–2.94) (Fig. 5B). Figure 5C shows the pooled HR for the association between the BMI 30–<35 group and ADL impairment in longitudinal studies (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.21–1.43).

Fig. 5. Association between high-BMI categories and ADL impairment, in comparison to the normal-weight group.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

A Individual and pooled odds ratios for the association between the BMI 30–<35 group and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods) in longitudinal studies. B Individual and pooled odds ratios for the association between the BMI > 35 group and ADL impairment (irrespective of ADL measurement methods) in longitudinal studies. C Individual and pooled hazard ratios for the association between the BMI 30–<35 group and ADL impairment in longitudinal studies. D Individual and pooled hazard ratios for the association between the BMI ≥ 25 group and ADL impairment measured by LTCI in longitudinal studies.

Pooled hazard ratios for the association between the BMI ≥ 25 group and ADL impairment measured by LTCI in longitudinal studies shows HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.05–2.27 (Fig. 5D). Additionally, we conducted a pooled analysis for association between the different the BMI groups (BMI ≥ 30, BMI 25–29.9, and BMI < 18.5) on ADL (irrespective of scale) based on geographical region (Supplementary Fig. S1: A, B, and C, respectively). The number of studies in each region was low except North America region. In North America region, the obese group revealed a positive association between BMI and ADL impairment.

Narrative synthesis

A total of 80 studies were not included in the meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity in BMI reference category and outcome measurement. Moreover, definition of obese, overweight and underweight groups were heterogeneous. In this case we have considered obesity, overweight and underweight as mentioned in the respective study. Among the longitudinal studies, the results of 43 studies were not included in the meta- analysis, among these, 20 studies [8, 9, 16–34] identified an association between the obese group and ADL impairment, four studies [8, 28, 29, 34] reported an association between the overweight group and ADL impairment, and 10 studies [8, 20, 24, 28, 31, 32, 34–37] indicated an association between the underweight group and ADL impairment and four studies reported association between BMI (without categorization) and ADL impairment [28, 38–40] (Supplementary Table S1). Among the cross-sectional studies, the results of 37 studies were not included in the meta-analysis. Among these, 12 studies [41–52] reported an association between the obese group and ADL impairment, 10 studies [42, 44, 46, 48, 51, 53–57] found an association between the overweight group and ADL impairment, and eight studies [42, 49, 53, 56, 58–61] identified an association between the underweight group and ADL impairment and five studies [62–66] reported association between BMI (without categorization) and ADL impairment (Supplementary Table S1).

Discussion

The meta-analysis investigated the link between BMI categories and ADL impairment in both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. The results show a positive association between obesity (BMI ≥ 30) and ADL impairment. Across different measurement methods, obese individuals consistently demonstrate higher OR for ADL limitations. Overweight individuals (BMI 25–29.9) also exhibit a moderate increase in ADL risk, particularly in longitudinal studies. However, the association weakens in cross-sectional studies. For the underweight group (BMI < 18.5), the Katz Index in both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies did not reveal an association. In contrast, an association was observed when assessed irrespective of ADL measurement methods. Interestingly, when using the LTCI for ADL measurement, the underweight group shows a higher risk. Cross-sectional analyses further support these trends, with positive associations observed irrespective of ADL measurement methods. In longitudinal studies, higher BMI categories (BMI ≥ 25, BMI 30–<35, BMI > 35) consistently demonstrate elevated risks of ADL impairment, suggesting a progressive association with increasing BMI. It is important to note that the analysis is complicated by the heterogeneity in BMI reference categories and outcome measurements, as well as the diverse definitions of obesity, overweight, and underweight groups. Due to these variations, a substantial number of studies could not be included in the meta-analysis. The complex interplay between BMI and ADL impairment may be influenced by various mechanisms. An elevated BMI often leads to increased mechanical stress on weight-bearing joints, such as the knees and hips. This can raise the risk of osteoarthritis [67], which may in turn reduce mobility and make it harder to perform ADLs. On the other hand, a low BMI is linked to muscle mass loss [68]. Having low muscle mass and strength has been found to be positively linked to dependence on ADLs [69].

The review authors did not find any systematic review explored the association between BMI and ADL impairment. In contrast, systematic review on the association between physical activity and ADL were conducted [70]. Another systematic review identified underweight and ADL as risk factors for sarcopenia [71]. In another systematic review, the authors found an association between BMI and frailty [72]. The authors reported that the underweight group had a higher risk of frailty (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.10–1.90), while the overweight group had a slightly lower risk (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.85–1.02), and the obese group had an increased risk (RR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.17–1.67).

In addition to our findings, other systematic reviews have examined BMI and disability, though with different focuses. One review assessed BMI and the risk of disability retirement, reporting a higher risk among underweight (HR/RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02–1.41), overweight (HR/RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07–1.19), and obese individuals (HR/RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.36–1.71) compared with normal-weight individuals, which aligns with our results [73].

Another review focused on BMI and ADL in older adults using longitudinal studies showed that underweight older adults were more likely to experience difficulties with BADL (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.03–1.72). In contrast, overweight older adults had a lower likelihood of BADL difficulties (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.79–0.83) [74]. The focus of these reviews differed from ours. Our review expands on previous work by including both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies and by considering all adults aged ≥18 years.

Implications

This systematic review highlights the importance of weight management and maintaining a healthy BMI to maintain independence in ADL. It also emphasizes the need for comprehensive strategies to prevent and address both obesity and underweight status across different age groups, in order to reduce the risk of ADL impairment.

The variability in how BMI categories and ADL measurement methods are defined underscores the need for standardization in future research. There is a particular need for focused efforts to standardize the assessment of ADL, by developing consistent criteria and ensuring that researchers adopt a uniform approach. By addressing these methodological variations, future studies can strengthen their findings and provide more accurate assessments of the relationship between BMI and ADL impairment.

Recent guidance from the 2025 Lancet Commission highlights important limitations of relying solely on BMI to classify obesity, noting that BMI can misclassify adiposity [73]. The Commission recommends supplementing BMI with additional anthropometric or body composition measures to more accurately identify excess adiposity and related functional limitations. This aligns with our observation that inconsistent BMI cut-offs across studies complicated the meta-analyses and underscores the limitations of relying solely on BMI when evaluating associations with ADL impairment. Future research would benefit from incorporating more comprehensive measures of body composition alongside BMI.

Strength and limitations

This review represents the first systematic review on this topic, which we conducted following standard methods and reported according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The quality of the included articles was critically assessed using the RoBANs tool.

However, this systematic review also has limitations. Although a comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted, we did not perform hand-searching of reference lists from included studies. Therefore, it is possible that some relevant studies may have been missed. A limitation of this review is that excluding individuals under 18 years of age narrowed its scope. Additionally, the review is limited by the lack of formal inter-rater reliability statistics (e.g., kappa coefficients) between reviewers during the screening stages. However, independent dual screening was performed, and disagreements were resolved in consultation with a third reviewer, in accordance with Cochrane guidance, to minimize selection bias. There were divergent cutoff points for categorizing BMI groups, which potentially posed a challenge to our analytical efforts. Similarly, there was considerable heterogeneity in the methods used to measure ADL. Different assessment tools and criteria were utilized, making it difficult to synthesize results and draw comprehensive conclusions. Furthermore, in the included studies, the definitions of obese, overweight, and underweight groups varied slightly. Due to the heterogeneity in BMI categories and ADL measurement methods, the majority of included articles were not considered for the meta-analysis. Some of the included studies exhibited a high risk of bias in participant selection, confounding variables, and exposure measurements. However, none of them were included in the meta-analysis. Some of the meta-analyses included a limited number of studies, and therefore the corresponding results should be interpreted with caution. A further limitation is that we did not GRADE the evidence.

Conclusion

Individuals with a higher BMI, as well as those who are underweight, exhibit an elevated risk of limitations in ADL. Our findings underline the importance of initiatives addressing both obesity and underweight status to mitigate the risk of ADL impairment.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text S1 (21.5KB, docx)
Supplementary Table S1 (55.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table S2 (14.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Figure S1 (2.2MB, jpg)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the authors of the included studies.

Author contributions

HY and RO conceptualized the study. HY, RO, MRM, and KMSUR designed the protocol, developed the search strategy, and refined the inclusion criteria. MRM and KMSUR performed the database search. HGN, TA, YJH, and YY screened titles and abstracts. MRM, ZS, YJH, and YY screened the full text. HGN, TA, YJH, and YY performed data extraction. MRM, ZS, YJH, and YY performed quality assessment, with any disagreements resolved by KMSUR and YN. MRM and HGN analyzed the data. MRM wrote the first draft, with all authors contributing to the writing and revision of the manuscript. MRM, HGN, KMSUR, and HY accessed and verified all the underlying data. All authors had full access to all the data in the study, approved the final version of the manuscript for submission, and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by Nagoya University.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41430-026-01707-4.

References

  • 1.WHO. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. World Health Organization; 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240063600.
  • 2.GBD 2019 Ageing Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diseases and injuries for adults 70 years and older: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Study. BMJ. 2022;376:e068208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yau PN, Foo CJE, Cheah NLJ, Tang KF, Lee SWH. The prevalence of functional disability and its impact on older adults in the ASEAN region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kumar A, Karmarkar AM, Tan A, Graham JE, Arcari CM, Ottenbacher KJ, et al. The effect of obesity on incidence of disability and mortality in Mexicans aged 50 years and older. Salud Publica Mex. 2015;57:s38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tabara Y, Nakatani E, Miyachi Y. Body mass index, functional disability and all-cause mortality in 330 000 older adults: the Shizuoka study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021;21:1040–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang S, Tomata Y, Sugiyama K, Kaiho Y, Honkura K, Watanabe T, et al. Body mass index and the risk of incident functional disability in elderly Japanese: the OHSAKI Cohort 2006 Study. Medicine. 2016;95:e4452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.An R, Shi Y. Body weight status and onset of functional limitations in U.S. middle-aged and older adults. Disabil Health J. 2015;8:336–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amankwaa I, Nelson K, Rook H, Hales C. Association between body mass index, multi-morbidity and activities of daily living among New Zealand nursing home older adults: a retrospective analysis of nationwide InterRAI data. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim S, Kim M, Han D. Incidence rates of disability and its associated factors among Korean community-dwelling older adults. Iran J Public Health. 2020;49:1718–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen N, Li X, Wang J, Zhou C, Wang C. Rural-urban differences in the association between disability and body mass index among the oldest-old in China. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019;81:98–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lv YB, Yuan JQ, Mao C, Gao X, Yin ZX, Kraus VB, et al. Association of body mass index with disability in activities of daily living among chinese adults 80 years of age or older. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e181915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nam S, Snih S, Al, Markides K. The effects of chronic medical conditions and obesity on self-reported disability in older Mexican Americans. Tex public Heal J. 2017;69:12–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, Seo HJ, Sheen SS, Hahn S, et al. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:408–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Danon-Hersch N, Fustinoni S, Bovet P, Spagnoli J, Santos-Eggimann B. Association between adiposity and disability in the Lc65+ cohort. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21:799–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Andrade FCD, Nazan AIN, Lebrão MLM, Duarte YADO. The impact of body mass index and weight changes on disability transitions and mortality in Brazilian older adults. J Aging Res. 2013;2013:905094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gaulton TG, Fleisher LA, Neuman MD. The association between obesity and disability in survivors of joint surgery: analysis of the health and retirement study. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:109–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hirani V, Naganathan V, Blyth F, Le Couteur DG, Seibel MJ, Waite LM, et al. Longitudinal associations between body composition, sarcopenic obesity and outcomes of frailty, disability, institutionalisation and mortality in community-dwelling older men: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project. Age Ageing. 2017;46:413–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wolff JL, Boult C, Boyd C, Anderson G. Newly reported chronic conditions and onset of functional dependency. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:851–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jung SH, Ostbye T, Park KO. A longitudinal study of the relationship between health behavior risk factors and dependence in activities of daily living. J Prev Med Public Heal. 2006;39:221–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lang IA, Llewellyn DJ, Alexander K, Melzer D. Obesity, physical function, and mortality in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1474–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Okamoto S, Okamura T, Sugiyama D, Hayakawa T, Nakamura Y, Miyagawa N, et al. Overweight or underweight and the risk of decline in activities of daily living in a 22-year cohort study of a Japanese sample. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018;18:799–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang Y, Xiong Y, Yu Q, Shen S, Chen L, Lei X. The activity of daily living (ADL) subgroups and health impairment among Chinese elderly: a latent profile analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yin Z, Shi X, Kraus VB, Brasher MS, Chen H, Liu Y, et al. Gender-dependent association of body mass index and waist circumference with disability in the Chinese oldest old. Obesity. 2014;22:1918–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Akune T, Muraki S, Oka H, Tanaka S, Kawaguchi H, Tokimura F, et al. Incidence of certified need of care in the long-term care insurance system and its risk factors in the elderly of Japanese population-based cohorts: the ROAD study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014;14(3):695–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Konagaya Y, Watanabe T. Evaluation of multimodal factors for the certification of long-term care insurance among community-dwelling elderly: a four-year follow-up study. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2014;51:170–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bürge E, von Gunten A, Berchtold A. Factors favoring a degradation or an improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) performance among nursing home (NH) residents: a survival analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56:250–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen JF, Xiao CH, Fang MW, Ma X. Impact of physical fitness on activities of daily life among the Chinese elderly. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41:220–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen LJ, Steptoe A, Ku PW. Obesity, apolipoprotein E ε4, and difficulties in activities of daily living among older adults: a 6-year follow-up study. Ann Behav Med. 2017;51:251–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Akada K, Koyama N, Miura Y, Takahashi K, Aoshima K. Nationwide database analysis of risk factors associated with decreased activities of daily living in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2023;94:1465–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee E, Jun SS. Trajectories of disability and related factors in Korean adults aged ≥75 years. J Appl Gerontol. 2023;42:1953–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lin L, Bai S, Qin K, Wong CKH, Wu T, Chen D, et al. Comorbid depression and obesity, and its transition on the risk of functional disability among middle-aged and older Chinese: a cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zahoor A. Association between body mass index and activities of daily living among homecare patients. Neuroquantology. 2022;20:4585–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Inoue T, Wakabayashi H, Maeda K, Momosaki R. Body mass index affects postoperative daily activities of older patients after gastrectomy. Eur Geriatr Med. 2021;12:825–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shirado K, Wakabayashi H, Maeda K, Momosaki R. Impact of body mass index on activities of daily living in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Healthcare. 2020;8:385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nakazawa A, Nakamura K, Kitamura K, Yoshizawa Y. Association between body mass index and mortality among institutionalized elderly adults in Japan. Environ Health Prev Med. 2013;18:502–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Angleman SB, Harris TB, Melzer D. The role of waist circumference in predicting disability in periretirement age adults. Int J Obes. 2005;30:364–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jonkman NH, Colpo M, Klenk J, Todd C, Hoekstra T, Del Panta V, et al. Development of a clinical prediction model for the onset of functional decline in people aged 65-75 years: pooled analysis of four European cohort studies. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou J, Lyu Y, Wei Y, Wang J, Ye L, Wu B, et al. Prediction of 6-year risk of activities of daily living disability in elderly aged 65 years and older in China. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022;102:94–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Borda MG, Venegas-Sanabria LC, Garcia-Cifuentes E, Gomez RC, Cano-Gutierrez CA, Tovar-Rios DA, et al. Body mass index, performance on activities of daily living and cognition: analysis in two different populations. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bürgea E, Berchtoldb A, Von Guntenc A. Gender-related ADL performance of old people recently admitted to a Swiss nursing home: a cross-sectional study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;141:w13183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen H, Bermúdez OI, Tucker KL. Waist circumference and weight change are associated with disability among elderly hispanics. J Gerontol Ser A. 2002;57:M19–M25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Himes. Obesity, disease, and functional limitation in later life. Demography. 2000;37:73–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Larrieu S, Pérès K, Letenneur L, Berr C, Dartigues JF, Ritchie K, et al. Relationship between body mass index and different domains of disability in older persons: the 3C study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1555–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Simoes EJ, Kobau R, Kapp J, Waterman B, Mokdad A, Anderson L. Associations of physical activity and body mass index with activities of daily living in older adults. J Community Health. 2006;31:453–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Setaka H, Shimada H. Relationships between body function, habitual exercise, daily physical activity and body composition of community-dwelling elderly. Rigakuryoho Kagak. 2009;24:179–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Handajani YS, Schröder-Butterfill E, Hogervorst E, Turana Y, Hengky A. Functional dependency and its associated factors among older adults in Indonesia. Aging Med Health. 2022;14:146–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kıskaç M, Soysal P, Smith L, Capar E, Zorlu M. What is the optimal body mass index range for older adults? Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022;26:49–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee D, Kim M, Won CW. Common and different characteristics among combinations of physical frailty and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: The Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2022;22:42–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Puzianowska-Kuznicka M, Kurylowicz A, Wierucki L, Owczarek AJ, Jagiello K, Mossakowska M, et al. Obesity in Caucasian seniors on the rise: is it truly harmful? Results of the PolSenior2 study. Nutrients. 2022;14:4621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang Y, Li L, Sun D, Wu W. Study on the combined effects of sleep and obesity on functional loss in middle-aged and elderly people. Chin J Dis Control Prev. 2023;27:883–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Estrella-Castillo DF, Gómez-De-Regil L. Comparison of body mass index range criteria and their association with cognition, functioning and depression: a cross-sectional study in Mexican older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Danielewicz AL, Barbosa AR, Del Duca GF. Nutritional status, physical performance and functional capacity in an elderly population in southern Brazil. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2014;60:242–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ono LM, Schneider IJC, Confortin SC, D’Orsi E. Paid work and physical activity preserve functional capacity in elderly people: EpiFloripa study. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2015;1:2333721415608022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Verbrugge LM, Gates DM, Ike RW. Risk factors for disability among U.S. adults with arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:167–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Komatsu M, Nezu S, Tomioka K, Hazaki K, Harano A, Morikawa M, et al. Factors associated with activities of daily living (ADL) in independently living elderly persons in a community: a baseline examination of a large scale cohort study, Fujiwara-kyo study]. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2013;68:22–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ahamed F, Rehman T, Krishnamoorthy Y, Kaur A, Debnath A, Ghosh T. Underweight is an important predictor for functional impairment among the older adults in Urban West Bengal, India: A cross sectional analytical study. J Fam Med Prim care. 2022;11:2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 59.Langlois JA, Norton R, Campbell AJ, Leveille S. Characteristics and behaviours associated with difficulty in performing activities of daily living among older New Zealand women. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:365–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Reyes-Ortiz CA, Ostir GV, Pelaez M, Ottenbacher KJ. Cross-national comparison of disability in Latin American and Caribbean persons aged 75 and older. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2006;42:21–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gil-Salcedo A, Dugravot A, Fayosse A, Landré B, Yerramalla MS, Sabia S, et al. Role of age and sex in the association between BMI and functional limitations in stroke patients: cross-sectional analysis in three European and US cohorts. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023;32:107270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ahmed S, Faruque M, Moniruzzaman M, Roby NU, Ashraf F, Yano Y, et al. The pattern of physical disability and determinants of activities of daily living among people with diabetes in Bangladesh. Endocrinol Diab Metab. 2022;5:e365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Connolly D, Garvey J, McKee G. Factors associated with ADL/IADL disability in community dwelling older adults in the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA). Disabil Rehabil. 2016;39:809–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tsai HJ, Chang FK. Associations between body mass index, mid-arm circumference, calf circumference, and functional ability over time in an elderly Taiwanese population. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0175062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nagai S. Predictors of help-seeking behavior: distinction between help-seeking intentions and help-seeking behavior. Jpn Psychol Res. 2015;57:313–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhou J, Liu S, Zhang Z, Ye L, Wang J, Chen C, et al. Distribution characteristics of body mass index among Chinese oldest-old aged 80 years and above. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2023;44:855–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zheng H, Chen C. Body mass index and risk of knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Akazawa N, Harada K, Okawa N, Tamura K, Moriyama H. Low body mass index negatively affects muscle mass and intramuscular fat of chronic stroke survivors. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0211145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang DXM, Yao J, Zirek Y, Reijnierse EM, Maier AB. Muscle mass, strength, and physical performance predicting activities of daily living: a meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11:3–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gomes ESA, Ramsey KA, Rojer AGM, Reijnierse EM, Maier AB. The association of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior with (instrumental) activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. Clin Inter Aging. 2021;16:1877–915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gao Q, Hu K, Yan C, Zhao B, Mei F, Chen F, et al. Associated factors of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2021;13:4291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yuan L, Chang M, Wang J. Abdominal obesity, body mass index and the risk of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2021;50:1118–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shiri R, Falah-Hassani K, Lallukka T. Body mass index and the risk of disability retirement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2020;77:48–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lingying W, Hong Z, Hongxiu C, Ziyi H, Mei F, Menglin T, et al. Association of body mass index with disability in activities of daily living in older adults: a systematic review of the literature based on longitudinal data. BMC Public Health. 2025;25:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Text S1 (21.5KB, docx)
Supplementary Table S1 (55.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table S2 (14.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Figure S1 (2.2MB, jpg)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES