Abstract
Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MT), which primarily affects the lungs (pulmonary tuberculosis) but can also involve other organs, such as bone, lymph nodes, brain, and kidney (extrapulmonary tuberculosis). Although it is a curable and preventable disease, it continues to be a major public health problem. Adherence to therapy plays an important role in treatment outcome. The objectives are to study the prevalence of non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment among new patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in the field practice area of a tertiary care hospital in Hyderabad and to determine the factors influencing non-adherence to treatment among new patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.
Methodology: A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in the field practice areas of Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, between October 2020 and March 2021. All newly diagnosed patients with pulmonary tuberculosis registered under Directly Observed Treatment Short-Course (DOTS) from October 2020 to March 2021 were taken into the study. Taking the prevalence of non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment as 50% and absolute error as 5% with 95% confidence interval, the sample size was calculated as 385, and the participants were chosen by simple random sampling. A predesigned, pretested, and semi-structured questionnaire was used for collecting data on sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics, and factors influencing non-adherence to treatment, such as patient-related factors, health system-related factors, stigma/discrimination, disease-related factors, and medicine-related factors, by interviewing the patients.
Results: The mean age of the study population was 43 years. Of the patients, 77.7% (299) were men and 22.3% (86) were women. In this study, 19.48% of the study participants had non-adherence to treatment. Socioeconomic status, educational status, marital status, side effects of drugs, awareness about treatment completion, and smoking were significantly associated with non-adherence to treatment.
Conclusion: Marital status, educational status, smoking, and socioeconomic constraints contribute to poor adherence. Improving adherence to treatment requires a comprehensive, patient-centered approach that combines health education, counselling, social support, and strengthened healthcare delivery systems.
Keywords: drug compliance, drug-resistant tb, poor adherence, tuberculosis, tuberculosis treatment adherence
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health concern globally. It is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), which is transmitted through the air by droplet nuclei or ingesting infected milk or meat (bovine TB) [1]. Tuberculosis is both preventable and curable. People with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB disease in the lungs) can infect others through droplet nuclei when they cough, sneeze, or talk [1]. With early detection and prompt treatment, people with the disease eventually get cured. For the same reason, the focus of public health machinery is on tuberculosis. Treatment adherence is one of the key factors affecting the outcome of the therapy. The impact of Directly Observed Treatment Short-Course (DOTS) in reducing the TB incidence has been hindered by non-adherence to treatment. Assessing the factors influencing treatment adherence will give the reasons behind high default rates and low treatment success rates.
Every year, millions of people are affected by tuberculosis. Despite being preventable and curable, 1.5 million people die from tuberculosis every year, making it the world’s top infectious killer [2]. India accounts for a quarter of the global TB burden, and in 2018, the estimated TB incidence was 2.69 million (199/100,000 population) [2]. In India, the incidence rate had reduced from 237 per lakh population in 2015 to 199 per lakh population in 2022. The mortality rate had also declined from 28 per lakh population in 2015 to 23 per lakh population in 2022 [3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), elimination means that there should be fewer than one person with TB for a population of a million people [4]. A significant amount of work remains to be done in order to achieve elimination by 2030.
This study is one of the very few studies conducted to identify factors associated with non-adherence to tuberculosis treatment in Hyderabad. Identifying the factors influencing non-adherence to TB treatment will contribute to the existing body of knowledge and also provide insights into the factors contributing to high default rates and low treatment success rates. Once the factors influencing non-adherence to treatment are identified, then targeted strategies can be formulated to address them. This study will benefit patients with tuberculosis as the findings may be used to formulate strategies and guidelines to improve the quality of care, thereby improving treatment outcomes.
The objectives are to study the prevalence of non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment among new patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in the field practice area of a tertiary care hospital in Hyderabad and to determine the factors influencing non-adherence to treatment among new patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.
Materials and methods
The present study is a community-based cross-sectional study carried out in the field practice areas of Harraj Penta (urban field practice area) and Patancheru (rural field practice area) of the Department of Community Medicine, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, between October 2020 and March 2021. All newly diagnosed patients with pulmonary tuberculosis registered under DOTS from October 2020 to March 2021 and have given consent to participate were taken into the study. Patients with tuberculosis who did not give informed consent, were unable to communicate, and were seriously ill at the time of data collection, and those with HIV co-infection were excluded from the study.
Operational definition
Non-adherence
Missing ≥2 consecutive weeks of DOTS was considered as non-adherence [5].
Taking the prevalence of non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment as 50% [6], with an absolute error of 5% with 95% confidence interval, the sample size was calculated as 385. The study participants were recruited into the study using simple random sampling. There are 26 DOTS centers under the Osmania Tuberculosis Unit (TU) and 1 in the rural field practice area. By identifying the DOTS centers under urban and rural field practice areas, the list of information containing new patients with pulmonary tuberculosis who were under treatment was obtained. From the list of 783 patients, a sample of 385 patients were selected randomly by generating the random numbers using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). The study subjects who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for the study.
A pilot study was conducted among 39 study subjects by taking 10% of the sample size in the field practice area, and the questionnaire was pretested and validated. A predesigned, pretested, and semi-structured questionnaire was used for collecting data on sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors, clinical characteristics, and factors influencing non-adherence to treatment, such as patient-related factors, health system-related factors, stigma/discrimination, disease-related factors, and medicine-related factors, by interviewing the patients. The modified BG Prasad classification was used to classify the socioeconomic status of the study subjects [7].
Once sampling was completed, a list of potential participants was compiled using their names and contact details, and data were collected through home visits. The participants were interviewed after reading the individual participant consent form that detailed the title and purpose of the study, as well as the rights of the participant. Whenever a participant has given consent to be interviewed, he/she was asked to provide a written consent by signing or fingerprinting.
Data was entered on spreadsheets using Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Epi Info version 7.2.2.6. Analysis included descriptive summary statistics and graphical summaries in the form of charts (pie, bar, and cross-tabulations). Univariate analysis using the chi-square test with a significance level at 5% was used, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association of various independent variables with the dependent variable after controlling for the effect of confounding factors using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multicollinearity was tested using the variance inflation factor. Nagelkerke R-square was 0.397, which meant that 39.7% of the variation in the outcome was explained by the variables of interest. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was statistically not found to be significant, which meant that the model was fit to predict outcomes.
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Osmania Medical College, Koti, Hyderabad (approval number: ECR/300/Inst/AP/2013/RR-16).
Results
The mean age of the study population was 43 years. The majority (75.84% (292)) of the study subjects belong to the 19-60-year age group. Of the study subjects, 5.20% were below 18 years of age. Of the patients, 77.7% (299) were men and 22.3% (86) were women. In this study, 19.48% of the study participants had non-adherence to treatment (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Distribution of study subjects based on treatment adherence.
Table 1 shows the knowledge regarding tuberculosis among the study participants.
Table 1. Knowledge regarding tuberculosis among the study participants.
| Knowledge variables | Adherent (number) | Non-adherent (number) | |
| TB is a serious disease. | Yes | 230 | 30 |
| No | 80 | 45 | |
| TB spreads by droplets. | Yes | 297 | 55 |
| No | 13 | 20 | |
| Cough with sputum for >2 weeks or sputum with blood is a criterion for suspecting TB. | Yes | 283 | 42 |
| No | 27 | 33 | |
| For TB, treatment is given in TB treatment centers. | Yes | 295 | 58 |
| No | 15 | 17 | |
| TB can be cured by taking medications regularly. | Yes | 297 | 60 |
| No | 13 | 15 | |
| Can you stop taking medications once your symptoms disappear? | Yes | 19 | 26 |
| No | 309 | 49 | |
| Do you know the duration of TB treatment? | Yes | 297 | 57 |
| No | 13 | 18 | |
| Do you know about the consequences of incomplete TB treatment? | Yes | 282 | 33 |
| No | 28 | 42 | |
| Vaccination can prevent TB. | Yes | 266 | 19 |
| No | 44 | 56 | |
| Proper hygiene, nutrition, and a healthy lifestyle can prevent TB. | Yes | 294 | 50 |
| No | 16 | 25 | |
Table 2 shows the factors influencing non-adherence to treatment among the study participants. There was a statistically significant association between marital status, socioeconomic status, education, side effects of drugs, awareness about treatment completion, improvement of symptoms, loss of daily wages, stigma/discrimination faced, and smoking, and treatment adherence.
Table 2. Factors influencing non-adherence to treatment.
p<0.05 was considered significant.
| Variable | Adherent | Non-adherent | Total | p-value | |
| Age | <18 years | 19 | 1 | 20 | 0.159 |
| 19-59 years | 230 | 62 | 292 | ||
| >60 years | 61 | 12 | 73 | ||
| Gender | Male | 240 | 59 | 299 | 0.937 |
| Female | 70 | 16 | 86 | ||
| Religion | Hindu | 132 | 31 | 163 | 0.216 |
| Christian | 25 | 2 | 27 | ||
| Muslim | 153 | 42 | 195 | ||
| Marital status | Single | 94 | 12 | 106 | 0.044 |
| Married | 168 | 49 | 217 | ||
| Widowed | 36 | 8 | 44 | ||
| Separated/divorced | 12 | 6 | 18 | ||
| Type of family | Nuclear | 196 | 54 | 250 | 0.356 |
| Joint | 51 | 9 | 60 | ||
| 3 generation | 63 | 12 | 75 | ||
| Educational status | Literate | 194 | 19 | 213 | <0.001 |
| Illiterate | 116 | 56 | 172 | ||
| Socioeconomic class | I - upper | 11 | 2 | 13 | 0.032 |
| II - upper middle | 47 | 8 | 55 | ||
| III - middle | 146 | 49 | 195 | ||
| IV - lower middle | 77 | 15 | 92 | ||
| V - lower | 29 | 1 | 30 | ||
| Awareness about the disease condition | Yes | 304 | 70 | 374 | 0.068 |
| No | 6 | 5 | 11 | ||
| Forgetfulness | Yes | 76 | 24 | 100 | 0.238 |
| No | 234 | 51 | 285 | ||
| Side effects | Yes | 301 | 67 | 368 | 0.008 |
| No | 9 | 8 | 17 | ||
| Change of residence | Yes | 15 | 7 | 22 | 0.220 |
| No | 295 | 68 | 363 | ||
| Travel time > 15 minutes | Yes | 208 | 56 | 264 | 0.260 |
| No | 102 | 19 | 121 | ||
| Transport difficulty | Yes | 34 | 10 | 44 | 0.707 |
| No | 276 | 65 | 341 | ||
| Improvement of symptoms | Yes | 285 | 61 | 346 | 0.011 |
| No | 25 | 14 | 39 | ||
| Awareness about treatment completion | Yes | 295 | 64 | 359 | 0.005 |
| No | 15 | 11 | 26 | ||
| Family support | Yes | 278 | 62 | 340 | 0.134 |
| No | 32 | 13 | 45 | ||
| Stigma/discrimination faced | Yes | 212 | 61 | 273 | 0.038 |
| No | 98 | 14 | 112 | ||
| Job security | Yes | 202 | 54 | 256 | 0.322 |
| No | 108 | 21 | 129 | ||
| Loss of daily wages | Yes | 276 | 59 | 335 | 0.027 |
| No | 34 | 16 | 50 | ||
| Longer duration of treatment | Yes | 232 | 49 | 281 | 0.128 |
| No | 78 | 26 | 104 | ||
| Left hometown for other reasons | Yes | 18 | 7 | 25 | 0.394 |
| No | 292 | 68 | 360 | ||
| Smoking | Yes | 128 | 48 | 176 | <0.001 |
| No | 182 | 27 | 209 | ||
| Alcohol | Yes | 94 | 32 | 126 | 0.061 |
| No | 216 | 43 | 259 | ||
Table 3 shows the multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors of treatment adherence. Marital status, educational status, and smoking were significantly associated with treatment adherence. Only a few variables were entered in the final model of binary logistic regression. Non-adherence to treatment was 2.304 times higher among married individuals compared to those who were not married/separated or divorced. Similarly, those who were illiterate were found to have non-adherence 6.789 times more compared with those who were literate, and it was statistically significant. Regarding smoking, smokers had 2.283 times more non-adherence compared with non-smokers, which was also statistically significant.
Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors of treatment adherence.
p<0.05 was considered significant.
CI: confidence interval
| Factors | Odds ratio | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Marital status | Single/separated | 1 | 0.007 | |
| Married | 2.304 | 1.260-4.214 | ||
| Educational status | Literate | 1 | <0.001 | |
| Illiterate | 6.789 | 3.218-14.323 | ||
| Socioeconomic class | Upper | 1 | 0.187 | |
| Middle/lower | 1.692 | 0.774-3.701 | ||
| Side effects | No | 1 | 0.502 | |
| Yes | 0.562 | 0.105-3.023 | ||
| Awareness about treatment completion | Yes | 1 | 0.597 | |
| No | 0.600 | 0.090-3.986 | ||
| Smoking | No | 1 | 0.034 | |
| Yes | 2.283 | 1.064-4.896 | ||
Discussion
Poor adherence contributes to the worsening of tuberculosis by increasing drug resistance. Evidence from the literature shows that there are many factors influencing adherence to treatment among patients with tuberculosis.
In this study, the prevalence of non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis medications was 19.48% among the total study population. Similar findings were observed in a study done by Bagchi et al. [8] in Mumbai, where 16% (87) were non-adherent. In a study done by Bam et al. [9] in Nepal, 16.12% (25) were non-adherent. Noncompliance with treatment among patients with tuberculosis affects the control of the disease, thereby leading to increased burden of the disease and mortality [10].
It was observed that 77.7% of the study participants were men and 22.3% were women. The study showed higher non-adherence among men. This might be due to the fact that men are more likely to have physically demanding jobs, and loss of wages can be a significant problem. However, the difference in the prevalence of treatment adherence associated with the gender of the patients is not statistically significant. Similar findings were seen in the study done by Shahrezaei et al. [11] and Kulkarni et al. [6]. In contrast to this, the study conducted by Gohel et al. [12] showed higher non-adherence among women.
The present study reveals that most of the patients belong to the age group 19-60 years (75.84%). It was found that non-adherence to treatment was more common among the productive age group, which was not statistically significant. These findings were similar to those by Gohel et al. [12]. Another study conducted by Mittal et al. [13] showed that non-adherence to treatment was found to be more common among elderly patients, whereas very good compliance to treatment was observed among pediatric patients.
In the present study, among the total study population, most of the patients (50.64% (195)) belonged to the middle socioeconomic class. There was a significant association between treatment adherence and socioeconomic class (p=0.032). The difference in the prevalence of treatment adherence associated with loss of daily wages faced by the patients is also statistically significant (p=0.027). Similar findings were found in the study conducted by Krasniqi et al. [14], and the study found that some patients faced high transportation costs when traveling to the health facility.
In the present study, 45.7% were smokers. There is a strong association between treatment adherence and smoking (p=0.0006). The study by Khan et al. [15] showed that smoking has a strong influence on tuberculosis and is a major barrier to treatment success. Hence, the study indicates that smoking cessation is an effective way to decrease treatment failure and thereby drug resistance.
In the present study, forgetfulness was one of the reasons for missing the doses, although the difference in the prevalence of treatment adherence associated with forgetfulness of the patients is statistically not significant.
In the present study, the perceived feeling of wellness or feeling cured was one of the reasons reported by patients for their intention to discontinue their treatment. The difference in the prevalence of treatment adherence associated with improvement of symptoms is statistically significant (p=0.011). Often, patients are very ill when they begin treatment. However, with time, as treatment progresses, their condition improves, and symptoms begin to subside. This itself can become a barrier to continuing treatment, as patients may not feel the need to complete it once they begin to feel better [16]. There is a need to address this issue. Health education must be given to all patients to emphasize the importance of adherence regardless of perceived recovery, as this could have important implications for preventing treatment interruption and thereby drug resistance.
Patients’ knowledge about their disease and its treatment will enhance treatment adherence. It was found that the majority of the patients lack adequate knowledge regarding tuberculosis and are not aware of the actual cause, mode of transmission, and duration of treatment. Treatment literacy refers to providing accurate information about the disease and its treatment, enabling patients to take greater responsibility for their own care and to advocate for their rights when appropriate care is not provided [13]. According to the study by Dewalt et al. [17], lack of treatment literacy will have an impact on health outcomes, and treatment literacy improves compliance and thereby outcomes. Although this study did not analyze the concept of treatment literacy, knowledge regarding the disease was observed, which was inadequate.
Several respondents did not know the conventional treatment duration or the risk when stopping the treatment. This was consistent with the study findings of Khan et al. [18] and Wares et al. [19]. The patients’ knowledge regarding tuberculosis symptoms was good, as the majority of the study participants were able to identify that a cough with sputum for more than two weeks or sputum with blood is a criterion for suspecting tuberculosis. Knowledge regarding treatment duration was statistically significant, as those who did not know the duration of tuberculosis treatment were more likely to be non-adherent. Lack of health education may result in non-adherence, as patients will not complete the treatment. Failure to complete the treatment is often associated with developing resistance to the drugs. In the study by Bam et al. [9], in Nepal, it was found that 48% of non-compliant patients with tuberculosis discontinued treatment once they felt better and symptom-free, believing that the disease was cured. Other studies, such as those done by O’Boyle et al. [20], Pushpananthan et al. [21], and Peltzer et al. [22], also had similar findings about feeling better being associated with non-adherence to treatment.
Most patients in this study reported TB medication side effects. Only a few had said they did not experience any side effects. Most of the patients further said the side effects disappeared after their adaptation to the medication. The difference in the prevalence of treatment adherence associated with side effects of the treatment is statistically significant (p=0.008). The side effects of the drugs can discourage patients from continuing treatment, especially during the initial weeks when they may feel worse. Therefore, it is important to provide health education to all patients and to manage any side effects promptly as they arise.
Similar findings were found in the studies conducted by Janakan and Seneviratne [23] and Okanurak et al. [24], which showed medicine side effects as factors affecting treatment adherence. The study by Janakan and Seneviratne [23] also indicated that delays in addressing adverse effects or dismissing patients’ complaints about medication can lead to treatment non-adherence.
According to WHO [25], most patients with tuberculosis complete treatment without experiencing significant side effects from the anti-tuberculosis medications. Common side effects that patients typically experience include skin rashes, visual and auditory disturbances, burning sensations in the limbs, and limb pain. These side effects may cause patients to stop the treatment. Hence, early diagnosis and prompt treatment of the side effects should be done immediately.
In the present study, the health facilities were located close to the majority of the interviewed patients’ residences. Very few patients reported a change of residence during their treatment course. The difference in the prevalence of treatment adherence associated with change of residence of the patients, travel time to the treatment center, and facing transport difficulty is statistically not significant (p>0.05). Most of the patients were supervised by a family member while taking the treatment. Several studies, such as those by Bam et al. [26], Hasker et al. [27], O’Boyle et al. [20], Pushpananthan et al. [21], and Needham et al. [28], showed that transportation costs contribute to treatment non-adherence, particularly once patients start feeling symptomatically better.
Most participants experienced societal stigma and discrimination in this study. The difference in the prevalence of treatment adherence associated with stigma/discrimination faced by the patients in society is statistically significant (p=0.038). Perceived stigma or discrimination in the community may act as a barrier, preventing patients from disclosing their disease to family or community members. Furber et al. [29] concluded that stigma and discrimination toward patients with tuberculosis and HIV lead to delays in seeking healthcare, testing, and treatment initiation, ultimately resulting in poor health outcomes.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors of treatment adherence is shown in Table 3. Marital status, educational status, and smoking were significantly associated with treatment adherence. Only a few variables were entered in the final model of binary logistic regression. Non-adherence to treatment was 2.304 times higher among married individuals compared to those who were not married/separated or divorced. Similarly, those who were illiterate were found to have non-adherence 6.789 times more compared with those who were literate, which was statistically significant. Regarding smoking, smokers had 2.283 times more non-adherence compared with non-smokers, which was also statistically significant.
The present study was conducted with a small sample size, which consisted of patients with tuberculosis who were on treatment from only selected areas of Hyderabad. Therefore, the findings of this study may not be generalizable. During the interview, the responses given by the study subjects might not have been accurate due to recall bias. Another limitation was the short time span, which did not allow follow-up of the study subjects to know the treatment outcome.
Conclusions
Poor adherence to tuberculosis treatment remains a major barrier to effective disease control. It leads to prolonged infectiousness, increased transmission in the community, higher rates of relapse, and the emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Factors contributing to poor adherence include long treatment duration, adverse drug effects, lack of patient awareness, stigma, socioeconomic constraints, and inadequate health system support. Improving adherence to treatment requires a comprehensive, patient-centered approach that combines health education, counselling, social support, and strengthened healthcare delivery systems. Strategies such as Directly Observed Therapy (DOT), digital adherence technologies, and community-based interventions are essential to ensure treatment completion. Addressing these challenges is critical for achieving national and global TB elimination goals and reducing the burden of tuberculosis.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Durga Anbalagan and Dr. Lakshman Rao RL contributed equally to the work and should be considered as co-first authors.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Institutional Ethics Committee of Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad issued approval ECR/300/Inst/AP/2013/RR-16.
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Durga Anbalagan
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Durga Anbalagan, Sandeep Kumar Dharnamoni, Prasanth Kumar Sarella, Lakshman Rao RL, Adarsh Kumar K
Drafting of the manuscript: Durga Anbalagan, Prasanth Kumar Sarella, Lakshman Rao RL, Adarsh Kumar K
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Durga Anbalagan, Sandeep Kumar Dharnamoni, Prasanth Kumar Sarella, Lakshman Rao RL, Adarsh Kumar K
Supervision: Lakshman Rao RL
References
- 1.Geneva: 1-30: 2008. World Health Organization: Tuberculosis and air travel : guidelines for prevention and control, 3rd ed. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization: Tuberculosis. 2026. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis
- 3.New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2024. National TB Elimination Programme: India TB Report 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Health Organization: Global tuberculosis report 2020. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131
- 5.A study on treatment compliance of patients under revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme in Jorhat district of Assam. Islam MM, Borgohain A. https://www.worldwidejournals.com/indian-journal-of-applied-research-(IJAR)/article/a-study-on-treatment-compliance-of-patients-under-revised-national-tuberculosis-control-programme-in-jorhat-district-of-assam/MTQ3NzM=/?is=1&b1=109&k=28 Indian J Appl Res. 2018;8 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Non-adherence of new pulmonary tuberculosis patients to anti-tuberculosis treatment. Kulkarni P, Akarte S, Mankeshwar R, Bhawalkar J, Banerjee A, Kulkarni A. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013;3:67–74. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.109507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Modified BG Prasad socio-economic classification, update - 2019. Pandey VK, Aggarwal P, Kakkar R. https://www.iapsmupuk.org/journal/index.php/IJCH/article/view/1055 Indian J Comm Health. 2019;31:150–152. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Determinants of poor adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment in mumbai, India. Bagchi S, Ambe G, Sathiakumar N. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3075517/ Int J Prev Med. 2010;1:223–232. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Factors responsible for non-compliance among tuberculosis patients in Kailali District, Nepal. Bam TS, Chand KB, Shrestha SD. https://jnhrc.com.np/index.php/jnhrc/article/view/2325 J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2005;3:52–57. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Noncompliance of treatment among tuberculosis patients in intensive phase at Kalutara District of Sri Lanka. Ranawaka N, Nandasena S, De Alwis S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33845963/ Indian J Tuberc. 2021;68:266–271. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Factors affecting mortality and treatment completion of tuberculosis patients in Isfahan Province from 2006 to 2011. Shahrezaei M, Maracy MR, Farid F. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26445638/ Int J Prev Med. 2015;6:91. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.165157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.A cross sectional study to assess the non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment and determinant factors among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Gohel H, Patel G, Shah E, Shah H, Dholakia H, Patel H. https://gcsmc.org/assets/pdf/journal/journal-1229/original-article/a-cross-sectional-study-to-assess-the-non-adherence-to-anti-tuberculosis201810051325310695330.pdf GCSMC J Med Sci. 2017;6:22–26. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Noncompliance to DOTS: how it can be decreased. Mittal C, Gupta S. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3104704/ Indian J Community Med. 2011;36:27–30. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.80789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tuberculosis treatment adherence of patients in Kosovo. Krasniqi S, Jakupi A, Daci A, et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4850324. Tuberc Res Treat. 2017;2017:4850324. doi: 10.1155/2017/4850324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Effect of smoking on treatment outcome among tuberculosis patients in Malaysia; a multicenter study. Khan AH, Sulaiman SA, Hassali MA, Khan KU, Ming LC, Mateen O, Ullah MO. http://15. Khan, A.H., Sulaiman, S.A.S., Hassali, M.A. et al. Effect of smoking on treatment outcome among tuberculosis patients in Malaysia; a multicenter study. BMC Public Health 20, 854 (2020). BMC Public Health. 2020;20:854. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08856-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Care during the continuation phase. Williams G, Alarcon E, Jittimanee S, Walusimbi M, Sebek M, Berga E, Villa TS. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18544196/ Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:731–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Dewalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone MP. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15610334/ J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1228–1239. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Knowledge, attitude and misconceptions regarding tuberculosis in Pakistani patients. Khan JA, Irfan M, Zaki A, Beg M, Hussain SF, Rizvi N. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16767946/ J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56:211–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Non-adherence to tuberculosis treatment in the eastern Tarai of Nepal. Wares DF, Singh S, Acharya AK, Dangi R. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12729337/ Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003;7:327–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Factors affecting patient compliance with anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy using the directly observed treatment, short-course strategy (DOTS) O'Boyle SJ, Power JJ, Ibrahim MY, Watson JP. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11936739/ Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002;6:307–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tuberculosis in Swaziland: a health needs assessment in preparation for a community-based programme. Pushpananthan S, Walley JD, Wright J. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11075655/ Trop Doct. 2000;30:216–220. doi: 10.1177/004947550003000412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Factors at first diagnosis of tuberculosis associated with compliance with the Directly Observed Therapy (DOT) in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Peltzer K, Onya H, Seoka P, Tladi FM, Malema RN. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12434639/ Curationis. 2002;25:55–67. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v25i3.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Factors contributing to medication noncompliance of newly diagnosed smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in the district of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Janakan N, Seneviratne R. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19124315/ Asia Pac J Public Health. 2008;20:214–223. doi: 10.1177/1010539508316974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Factors contributing to treatment success among tuberculosis patients: a prospective cohort study in Bangkok. Okanurak K, Kitayaporn D, Akarasewi P. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18812046/ Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:1160–1165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Anti-tuberculosis medication side-effects constitute major factor for poor adherence to tuberculosis treatment. Awofeso N. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2647396/ Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:0. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.043802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Factors affecting patient adherence to DOTS in urban Kathmandu, Nepal. Bam TS, Gunneberg C, Chamroonsawasdi K, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16562706/ Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10:270–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Default from tuberculosis treatment in Tashkent, Uzbekistan; who are these defaulters and why do they default? Hasker E, Khodjikhanov M, Usarova S, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18647400/ BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Barriers to tuberculosis control in urban Zambia: the economic impact and burden on patients prior to diagnosis. Needham DM, Godfrey-Faussett P, Foster SD. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9783528/ Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998;2:811–817. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Barriers to better care for people with AIDS in developing countries. Furber AS, Hodgson IJ, Desclaux A, Mukasa DS. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15564262/ BMJ. 2004;329:1281–1283. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

