Skip to main content
BMC Cancer logoLink to BMC Cancer
. 2026 Apr 14;26:661. doi: 10.1186/s12885-026-15987-3

Clinicopathologic characteristics and predictors of treatment uptake among patients with cervical cancer managed at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia

Demisew Amenu Sori 1,2,✉, Rahma Ali 3, Nega Jibat 4, Wondimagegn Adissu 5, Gerezgiher Buruh 6, Haftamu Hailekiros 7, Endashaw Nadew 8, Ashenafi Alemu 9, Alemseged Abdissa 10, Gelila K Goba 11, Suzanne M Garland 12, Nigisti Mulholland 13, Kim Mulholland 14,15, Eva J Kantelhardt 16
PMCID: PMC13192001  PMID: 41981508

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer remains a major public health concern in Ethiopia because of limited screening and delayed diagnosis, resulting in high mortality. Most patients present with advanced-stage disease, predominantly squamous cell carcinoma. Despite the World Health Organization’s 90%–70%–90% strategy, screening coverage is low, and access to treatment remains inadequate. This study assessed the clinicopathologic characteristics and predictors of treatment uptake among cervical cancer patients managed at Jimma University Medical Center in southwest Ethiopia to inform evidence-based interventions.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Jimma University Medical Center, including all women with histologically confirmed cervical cancer between April 2019 and October 2024. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, pathology, and outcomes were collected using a pretested tool and entered into REDCap. Missing outcome data were supplemented through telephone interviews. Multiple imputation was used for missing explanatory variables (n = 20 datasets). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 17, univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of treatment uptake.

Result

Among the 719 women with cervical cancer, most were illiterate, grand multiparous, and from rural areas. Postmenopausal bleeding and pelvic pain were the most common presenting symptoms. Over two-thirds experienced delays in seeking care exceeding 90 days, and only 16% had a history of prior cervical cancer screening. Of the 709 patients with documented stage, 78.4% presented with advanced disease (stage IIB–IV)), while 21.6% were diagnosed at an early stage (stage I–IIA). Chemoradiotherapy was the main treatment modality, while surgery was rarely performed. Treatment uptake was higher among women younger than 55 years (OR = 2.27; 95% CI: 1.08–4.75) and those with formal education (OR = 3.31; 95% CI: 1.25–8.70), whereas women diagnosed at stage IV were significantly less likely to receive treatment (OR = 0.10; 95% CI: 0.03–0.43).

Conclusion

These findings underscore the need to strengthen culturally appropriate community awareness and expand accessible screening programmes, particularly in rural areas, to improve timely treatment and outcomes for women in middle age. Vaccination and palliative care services should also be integrated into comprehensive cervical cancer care.

Keywords: cervical cancer, clinicopathology, outcomes, cervical cancer treatment, cervical cancer screening

Introduction

Cervical cancer (CC) is a major global health concern, ranking as the fourth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. In 2022, an estimated 604,127 new cases and 341,831 deaths were attributed to CC [1]. Notably, approximately 90% of cases occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where organised screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programmes are often lacking [2]. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the incidence of CC has been rising alarmingly [3], with Eastern and Southern Africa bearing the highest burden [4]. In Ethiopia, CC is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among women, after breast cancer. It is also the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the country, with an estimated 7,445 new cases and 5,338 deaths annually [5].

The high mortality rate in Ethiopia is largely attributed to low screening coverage, stemming from a poorly coordinated CC screening programme [6, 7]. Late-stage diagnosis is common due to limited awareness, delays in diagnostic testing, and difficulties in accessing curative treatment [8–11]. However, HPV vaccination coverage in Ethiopia shows promise, with first- and second-dose coverage reported at 86% and 75%, respectively [5].

Understanding the histological types of CC is crucial for developing effective screening strategies. In regions where adenocarcinoma (AC) is more common, HPV DNA testing is important because routine cytology is less effective in detecting AC [12, 13]. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the predominant histological type in SSA and South-Central Asia, with a prevalence of 92.63% in SSA. By contrast, AC is relatively more common in North America and Europe, with a prevalence of 23.72% in Oceania [14]. A study in India found SCC to be the most prevalent histological type, accounting for 93.3% of cases, followed by AC at 5%, with other types making up 1.7% [15].

Similarly, SCC is the predominant histologic type in East African countries. In Uganda, SCC accounts for 86.3% of cases, with AC and other types comprising 13.7% [16]. In Malawi, SCC is reported in 85.7% of cases, followed by AC at 8.8% [17]. In Kenya, 91% of cases are SCC, 8% are AC, and 1% belong to other histologic types [18]. Studies in Ethiopia also indicate that SCC is the most common histologic type, with prevalence ranging from 83% to 96%, while AC accounts for 3.3% to 15% of cases [19–21].

Elimination of CC is possible, but many LMICs, including Ethiopia, lack effective preventive and therapeutic programmes. The World Health Organization urges global action to implement the 90%–70%–90% strategy by 2030: 90% of girls vaccinated by age 15, 70% of women screened at ages 35 and 45, and 90% of those diagnosed treated [22]. However, challenges in diagnosis and treatment in LMICs hinder this strategy because most patients in these regions present at a late stage due to inadequate early detection of precancerous lesions. In Ethiopia, 60.45% of patients are diagnosed at a late stage [23], largely because of limited awareness and knowledge about the disease, its risk factors, and screening methods, as well as restricted access to treatment [11].

Ethiopia’s CC prevention strategy includes tertiary care, but access to specialised treatments such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy is limited to a few cities and remains costly. While early-stage cases are potentially curable, inadequate screening and limited access to treatment continue to hinder survival rates. The Ministry of Health aims to screen 80% of women aged 30–49 by 2025, yet national coverage was only 5% between 2015 and 2020 [24], highlighting significant challenges in achieving this goal.

Moreover, there is limited evidence on the clinicopathologic features and treatment uptake of patients with CC in Ethiopia, which is crucial for guiding policy decisions. This underscores the urgent need for updated data to support evidence-based interventions. The present study was performed to assess the clinicopathologic characteristics and predictors of treatment uptake among patients with CC managed at Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC), providing current evidence to inform policy and practice.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

A hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with CC who were registered at the Gynecology and Oncology Center of JUMC, Oromia, Ethiopia, between April 2019 and October 2024. Data were collected from June to November 2024. JUMC is located in Jimma Town, 350 km southwest of Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia. It is the second tertiary teaching hospital in the country to provide comprehensive cancer treatment, including radiotherapy, since February 2022.

Population, sample size, and sampling technique

The study included all patients with histologically diagnosed CC who were registered at JUMC during the study period.

Data collection

The data extraction form was developed based on the study objectives and relevant literature, reviewed by senior clinicians and researchers, and pilot-tested on a subset of patient records. The finalized tool was implemented in REDCap with predefined variable names, value labels, validation rules, and branching logic to ensure data quality.

The dependent variable was treatment uptake, defined as initiation of any cervical cancer–directed treatment following histologic confirmation. Independent variables included sociodemographic, clinical, pathological, and health system–related factors. The instrument was used to collect sociodemographic information, clinical characteristics, pathological findings, and treatment initiation status. Trained female data collectors entered data into REDCap. Cancer registries from the Oncology Centre and Gynaecology Ward were used to obtain patients’ medical registration numbers, after which medical records were retrieved from the hospital archive.

For patients with undocumented outcomes, phone interviews were conducted with patients or caregivers. Overall, 200 records had incomplete outcome data; 158 patients were successfully contacted. During the phone interview, 69 patients were identified as deceased and were recorded accordingly, with no further interviews conducted. Outcome status was determined using medical records and caregiver reports where available.

Statistical analysis

In this study, the health-seeking interval was defined as the period between the patient’s first recognition of symptoms and the first consultation with a healthcare provider. This interval was considered delayed if it exceeded 90 days. The diagnostic interval (DI) was defined as the time between the first consultation with a healthcare provider and the date of histologically confirmed diagnosis, and it was considered delayed if it exceeded 30 days. The pretreatment interval (PTI) was defined as the period between histopathologic diagnosis and commencement of cancer treatment, and it was considered delayed if it exceeded 30 days [16, 25–27].

Data were cleaned and analysed using STATA version 17 software. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sociodemographic, clinical, pathological, and treatment characteristics. We examined sociodemographic, clinical, and health service–related characteristics as potential predictors of treatment initiation among women diagnosed with cervical cancer. These included age, place of residence, educational status of the patient and her husband, stage of cervical cancer, parity, and diagnostic interval. Treatment initiation was treated as a binary outcome (yes/no).

Because some predictor variables had missing values, multiple imputation with chained equations was carried out before conducting regression analyses to make the best use of the available data and reduce potential bias. Missing information was limited to the stage of disease and educational variables. These variables were imputed, while variables with complete data, including the outcome, were kept as observed. Categorical variables with more than two categories were imputed using multinomial logistic regression models, and all relevant predictors were included in the imputation process. Only twenty imputed datasets were generated, and a fixed random seed (rseed = 12345) was used to ensure reproducibility.

After imputation, we first performed univariable logistic regression analyses to explore crude associations between each predictor and treatment initiation. We then fitted a multivariable logistic regression model across the imputed datasets to identify independent predictors. Results were pooled using Stata’s mi estimate command and are presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

In total, 719 patients with CC were identified, and their data were accessed. The patients’ mean age was 52.6 ± 10.5 years (range, 28–96 years). Patients seeking care came from nearly all regions of the country, with the majority (69.9%) from the Oromia region. Most patients resided in rural areas (59.2%), were unable to read and write (43.5%), and were grand multiparous (71.1%). The most common clinical symptoms were postmenopausal bleeding (34.5%), persistent pelvic and/or back pain (26.1%), and abnormal vaginal discharge (16.5%). Approximately 66.5% of patients had a health-seeking interval longer than 90 days. For (6%) of the patients, the HIV status was positive, and only (16.0%) had a history of CC screening (Table 1). The median diagnostic interval was 20 days, and the median pre-treatment interval was 62 days (Table 2).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients with CC managed at JUMC, Ethiopia

Variable Frequency Percentage

Age, years (n = 719)

Mean ± SD

52.6 ± 10.5

≤ 44 118 16.4
45–54 303 42.1
55–64 226 31.4
≥ 65 72 10.0
Regions (n = 718) Oromia 502 69.9
Amhara 35 4.9
Addis Ababa 37 5.1
Gambela 13 1.8
SNNP 126 17.6
Others 5 0.7
Residence (n = 714) Urban 291 40.8
Rural 423 59.2

Educational status

(n = 588)

Unable to read and write 256 43.5
Primary 189 32.2
Secondary and above 143 24.3
Education level of husband (585) Unable to read and write 166 28.4
Primary 182 31.1
Secondary and above 237 40.5
Parity (n = 622) ≤ 1 17 2.7
2–4 163 26.2
≥ 5 442 71.1
Symptoms (n = 718) Heavy and prolonged menstrual bleeding 181 13.8
Contact bleeding 41 3.1
Abnormal vaginal discharge 216 16.5
Pain during intercourse 79 6.0
Postmenopausal bleeding 453 34.5
Persistent pelvic and or back pain 342 26.1

Health-seeking interval (n = 717)

Median = 180 days

≤ 3 months 241 33.6
> 3–12 months 386 53.8
> 12 months 90 12.6
HIV status (n = 215) Positive 13 6.0
Negative 202 94.0
History of CC screening (n = 619) No 520 84.0
Yes 99 16.0

SD standard deviation, SNNP Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region

Table 2.

Time intervals for receiving services among patients with CC managed at JUMC, Ethiopia

Variables Observations (n) Median (IQR) Min Max
DI, days 578 20 (17.0) 1 809
PTI, days 521 62 (83.0) 3 1404
Death interval (treated patients), months 107 10.1 (10.1) 0.3 33.6
Death interval (untreated patients), months 30 6.6 (6.3) 1.6 35.1

IQR interquartile range, Min minimum, Max maximum

Of the 709 patients with documented International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, half (50%) presented with stage IIB disease, and 78.4% had advanced-stage disease (stage IIB or above). SCC was the predominant histologic type (97.0%), followed by AC (2.7%). Approximately 92% of patients (91.6%, 95% CI: 89.3%–93.4%) received at least one form of treatment. Among those treated, 59.1% accessed services through the private wing, which required additional payment but did not require prior appointments. The most common treatment regimen was Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (78.2%), while surgery was the least common (3.9%). Regarding patient outcomes, 53.0% were alive and 29.2% had died at the time of follow-up. The median time from histopathological diagnosis to death (death interval) was 10.1 months for treated patients and 6.6 months for untreated patients. The outcome for 17.8% of patients remained unknown. Among treated patients, 25% were cured, 36%% showed improvement, 5.9% experienced disease progression or complications, and 33.1% had died. By contrast, among untreated patients, 63.8% had died, and 36.2% were alive at the time of the interview (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 3.

Stages, histopathology, and outcomes of patients with CC managed at JUMC, Ethiopia

Variable Frequency Percentage
Early-stage disease (n = 153/709) Stage I 6 0.9
Stage IIA 147 20.7
Advanced-stage disease (n = 556/709) Stage IIB 355 50.0
Stage III 156 22.0
Stage IV 45 6.4
Histologic type (n = 707) Squamous cell carcinoma 686 97.0
Adenocarcinoma 19 2.7
Adenosquamous cell carcinoma 2 0.3

Initiated on treatment

(N = 719)

Yes 659 91.7
No 60 8.3
Treatment regimen (n = 647) Surgery 25 3.9
Radiotherapy 29 4.4
Chemotherapy 55 8.5
Chemoradiotherapy 506 78.2
Surgery with Chemoradiotherapy 32 5.0
Outcomes (all patients) (n = 586) Alive 378 64.5
Dead 208 35.5
Outcomes (treated patients) (n = 539) Cured 135 25.0
Improving 194 36.0
Disease progression/complications 32 5.9
Dead 178 33.1
Outcomes (untreated patients) (n = 47) Alive 17 36.2
Dead 30 63.8
Type of treatment service followed (n = 553) Private wing 388 70.2
Routine or scheduled 165 29.8

After multiple imputation, univariable logistic regression analyses showed that younger age, urban residence, higher educational status of both the patient and her husband, advanced stage of disease, high parity, and a prolonged diagnostic interval were associated with treatment initiation.

In the multiple imputation multivariable logistic regression model, younger age and higher patient educational status remained independent positive predictors of treatment initiation, whereas advanced stage of disease remained a strong negative predictor. Women under the age of 55 years had significantly higher odds of receiving treatment than did those aged 55 years and above (AOR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.06–4.69), and women with primary education or above (formal education) were more likely to receive treatment than those without formal education (AOR = 3.31; 95% CI: 1.26–8.71). In contrast, women diagnosed with Stage IV cervical cancer were substantially less likely to initiate treatment (AOR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03–0.44). Although urban residence, husband’s educational status, high parity, and a prolonged diagnostic interval showed associations with treatment initiation in the adjusted analysis, these did not reach statistical significance (Table 4).

Table 4.

Predictors of treatment initiation among patients with CC managed at JUMC, Ethiopia

Variable Treatment initiation N = 557 (%) Univariable logistic regression Multiple imputation multivariable logistic regression
No Yes COR 95% CI AOR 95% CI
Age, years < 55 16 (4.92) 309 (95.08) 2.87 1.52, 5.39 2.23 1.06, 4.69
≥ 55 30 (12.93) 202 (87.07) 1
Residence Urban 8 (3.29) 235 (96.71) 4.12 1.88, 9.00 2.10 0.78, 5.61
Rural 38 (12.30) 271 (87.70) 1
Education level of patient Unable to read and write 38 (15.97) 200 (84.03)
Primary and above 8 (2.52) 309 (97.48) 3.92 2.12, 7.27 3.31 1.26, 8.71
Education level of husband Unable to read and write 26 (17.11) 126 (82.89) 1
Primary and above 20 (5.00) 380 (95.00) 7.33 3.35, 16.06 2.23 0.99, 5.01
Stage of CC Stage I–IIA2 8 (6.96) 107 (93.04) 1
Stage IIB 20 (7.41) 250 (92.59) 0.94 0.399, 2.19 1.21 0.48, 3.09
Stage III 11 (8.80) 114 (91.20) 0.78 0.3, 2.0 0.82 0.28, 2.35
Stage IV 7 (18.92) 30 (81.08) 0.32 0.11, 0.96 0.11 0.03, 0.44
Parity ≤ 4 7 (4.90) 136 (95.10) 1
≥ 5 39 (12.26) 279 (87.74) 0.37 0.16, 0.85 0.87 0.34, 2.22
Diagnostic interval ≤ 30 days 27 (8.88) 277 (91.12) 1
> 30 days 19 (16.81) 94 (83.19) 0.48 0.26, 0.91 0.54 0.26, 1.11

COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval

Discussion

This study investigated the clinicopathologic features and the predictors of treatment uptake among patients with CC managed at JUMC, Ethiopia. Although previous studies in Ethiopia have examined certain aspects of CC, they have not provided a comprehensive analysis, and no prior study has been conducted at this centre.

In this study of 719 patients, the majority were from rural areas, were unable to read and write, and were grand multiparous. The most commonly reported symptoms were postmenopausal bleeding and pelvic pain. Approximately two-thirds of patients experienced a health-seeking delay of more than 3 months, and only 16% had a history of prior screening. Among the 709 patients with documented FIGO stage, 78.4% were diagnosed at an advanced stage, with SCC accounting for 97.0% of cases. Most patients received treatment, predominantly CRT, while surgical intervention was rare. Multivariable analysis identified age, education level, and disease stage as significant predictors of treatment uptake. Patients younger than 55 years and those with formal education were more likely to receive treatment, whereas patients diagnosed at stage IV were significantly less likely to receive treatment than were those diagnosed at earlier stages.

The mean age of the patients with CC in this study (52.7 ± 10.6 years) is comparable to findings from a global analysis, in which the average age at diagnosis was 53 years [4], as well as studies in Uganda (50.0 ± 11.7 years) [16], a cancer centre in northwestern Nigeria (49.9 ± 11.9 years) [28], and Ghana (56.9 years) [29]. It is also similar to previous studies in Ethiopia, where the mean ages were 53 ± 12 years [19] and 52.6 ± 13.17 years [8]. However, it is higher than that reported in Malawi (44.9 years) [30]. The underlying age structure of the population influences the average age of patients. Additionally, such variations may be attributed to differences in risk factors influencing the progression of high-risk HPV infection to invasive CC, including HIV infection and other comorbidities. Notably, 47% of participants in the Malawian study were HIV-positive, compared with only 6% in the current study, which may have contributed to the earlier onset of invasive CC. The younger age at diagnosis in Malawi could also be associated with the high prevalence of sexual violence among children and adolescents in the country [31].

The majority of patients in this study came from rural areas (59.2%), comparable to a previous study (57.4%) [19]. Additionally, 43.5% of patients were unable to read or write, similar to findings from another study (38.5%) [8]. The consistency in sociodemographic characteristics across studies may indicate persistent disparities in CC prevention and control programmes among rural and uneducated populations.

The most common symptoms among patients in this study were postmenopausal bleeding (34.5%), persistent pelvic and/or back pain (26.1%), and abnormal vaginal discharge (16.5%). These patterns align with findings from Ghana, where postmenopausal bleeding, vaginal discharge, and pelvic pain accounted for 43.0%, 32.8%, and 7.0%, respectively [32]. The presence of postmenopausal bleeding should prompt immediate medical consultation unless cancer has already been ruled out. However, nearly two-thirds (66.4%) of patients in this study had a delayed health-seeking interval exceeding 3 months, compared with 15.2% in the Ghanaian study [32], 55.4% in a Moroccan study [26], and 23.4% in an earlier Ethiopian study [8]. These differences likely reflect variations in socioeconomic status, place of residence, and awareness of CC.

The median DI of 20 days in this study is not considered delayed, whereas the median PTI of 62 days indicates a significant delay. A similar PTI delay (2.4 months) was reported in a study conducted in Uganda [16]. This delayed PTI highlights the shortage of comprehensive treatment centres, particularly radiotherapy facilities, which are crucial for managing the majority of patients who present with advanced-stage disease.

Only 16% of patients in this study reported a history of CC screening, which is higher than the rate reported in Ghana [32] but markedly lower than the 57.4% observed in Botswana [33]. The higher screening coverage in Botswana may be attributed to the country’s relatively better socioeconomic conditions and its high HIV prevalence (69.7%) because individuals living with HIV are at increased risk of developing CC and are prioritised in screening programmes. These findings underscore the alarmingly low uptake of CC screening and highlight the urgent need to strengthen screening initiatives. Expanding access to globally recommended HPV DNA testing in culturally appropriate and accessible ways is essential to improving early detection and prevention of CC.

Among the 709 patients with documented FIGO staging in this study, 78.0% presented with advanced-stage disease (FIGO stages IIB–IV). This finding is consistent with studies from other African countries, where the prevalence of advanced-stage disease ranges from 70.6% in Ibadan, Nigeria, to 86% in Uganda [18, 28, 34–36]. However, it is notably higher than the reported prevalence in Southern Malawi (38.7%) [30] and in Ghana (66.0%) [37], yet slightly lower than that reported in an Ethiopian study, where the prevalence of late-stage or advanced-stage disease was 87.9% [38]. Variations in the prevalence of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis may be influenced by sociodemographic factors, awareness levels, and other contributing factors such as HIV prevalence. For instance, in Malawi, where 47% of patients with CC were HIV-positive, higher CC screening rates may have contributed to increased early-stage detection. The high proportion of advanced-stage cases in this study underscores the extremely low coverage of CC screening, limited knowledge and awareness about the disease, and inadequate access to early detection services.

SCC was the dominant histologic type (97.0%), exceeding the global average of 82.7%, while AC accounted for 2.7%, lower than the global estimate of 12.18% [14]. These findings are consistent with studies from India, where SCC comprised 93.3% and AC 5% [15], and from Ethiopia, where SCC accounted for 96% and AC 3% [9]. However, the prevalence of SCC was higher than that reported in Ghana (64.9% SCC, 8.4% AC) and Kenya (91% SCC, 8% AC) [16, 18, 29, 36, 37, 39], reflecting regional variations in histologic types, with SCC being more prevalent in East Africa. The higher prevalence of SCC is advantageous because it is more readily detected through screening and generally has better treatment outcomes than AC.

Approximately 92% of patients (91.6%, 95% CI: 89.3%–93.4%) initiated at least one form of cervical cancer–directed treatment. The majority (78.2%) received chemoradiotherapy, while only a small proportion (3.9%) underwent surgery. This treatment pattern is consistent with guideline-based management for advanced-stage disease and reflects the stage distribution in our cohort, where nearly four in five patients (78%) presented with advanced disease requiring combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy [40]. Nevertheless, this apparently high treatment uptake should be interpreted with caution. A substantial proportion of patients received treatment with palliative rather than curative intent, underscoring the consequences of late presentation. Moreover, treatment initiation and continuity were frequently compromised by prolonged waiting times related to limited radiotherapy capacity, as well as by the financial burden of cancer care, both of which contributed to treatment delays and non-compliance. These findings underscore the persistent challenge of late diagnosis in Ethiopia and are closely linked to the low coverage of cervical cancer screening, which remains markedly limited, with reported uptake ranging from 5% [24] to 14.8% [6, 7].

Among the 586 treated patients with known outcomes, 64.5% were alive, and 35.5% had died at the time of the interview. The median time from diagnosis to death was 10.1 months. The mortality rate in this study was higher than that reported in a previous Ethiopian study (23.5%) [41], likely due to differences in sociodemographic characteristics, including a higher proportion of rural patients and the predominance of advanced-stage disease in the present study.

In this study, multiple imputed multivariable analysis identified patient age, education level, and disease stage as significant predictors of CC treatment. Patients younger than 55 years and those with formal education were more likely to receive treatment, whereas those diagnosed at stage IV were significantly less likely to receive treatment than those diagnosed at earlier stages. This likely reflects the prioritisation of limited radiotherapy resources for women with earlier-stage disease.

Accordingly, women under the age of 55 years had significantly higher odds of receiving CC treatment than those aged 55 years and above (AOR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.06–4.69). This finding is consistent with previous studies, which have also reported that younger patients are more likely to undergo treatment, although the specific age cut-offs vary across studies [42–48]. Several factors may explain this association. Younger women often exhibit greater health-seeking behaviour, leading to earlier diagnosis and better engagement with treatment services. In addition, they typically have fewer comorbidities, higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores, and more robust immune function, which may increase their likelihood of being eligible for, and successfully completing cancer treatment.

Similarly, women with formal education were significantly more likely to receive CC treatment than were those without formal education (OR = 3.31; 95% CI: 1.26–8.71). This association may be attributed to the greater health literacy and awareness commonly observed among educated women, which can enhance their understanding of the disease, available treatment options, and the importance of timely care. Previous studies have likewise shown that women with formal education are more likely to engage with health services, adhere to medical advice, and navigate the healthcare system effectively, all of which contribute to increased treatment uptake [49–52].

Furthermore, in this study, women diagnosed with stage IV CC were significantly less likely to receive treatment than were those diagnosed at earlier stages (I–IIA2) (AOR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03–0.44). This finding is consistent with previous studies demonstrating that women with advanced-stage disease are more likely to present late and less likely to initiate treatment [53–55]. This may be because stage IV CC often involves metastasis to distant organs, limiting the effectiveness of curative treatment options. Consequently, healthcare providers may prioritise palliative care over definitive treatment. In addition, some patients may choose not to initiate treatment because of the perceived limited benefits and potential adverse effects associated with advanced therapies.

Strengths and limitations

This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of patients with CC by examining sociodemographic characteristics, delays in health-seeking and diagnostic intervals, clinicopathologic features, and predictors of treatment initiation among those diagnosed during the study period. However, a key limitation lies in the retrospective nature of treatment outcome assessment. Because of connectivity challenges and the unavailability of accurate contact information, some patients could not be reached by telephone, resulting in an undetermined treatment status for a subset of the study population.

Conclusion

This study highlights substantial delays in the diagnosis and treatment of CC in Ethiopia, with most patients presenting at advanced stages, largely because of low screening uptake and prolonged health-seeking intervals. Treatment initiation was significantly associated with age, education status, and stage at diagnosis. These findings underscore the urgent need to strengthen community awareness, expand access to CC screening services, and implement effective early detection strategies to enable timely treatment and improve patient outcomes.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the data collectors and supervisors for their unwavering dedication to this study. We also extend our heartfelt appreciation to the study participants and their families for their invaluable time and active participation. In addition, we acknowledge the support of the following institutions: the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, England; the Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa; Jimma University, Ethiopia; the University of Melbourne and the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Australia; and Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Abbreviations

CC

Cervical cancer

LMICs

Low- and middle-income countries

SSA

Sub-Saharan Africa

AC

Adenocarcinoma

SCC

Squamous cell carcinoma

FIGO

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

DI

Diagnostic interval

PTI

Pre-treatment interval

HPV

Human papillomavirus

JUMC

Jimma University Medical Center

Authors’ contributions

**D.A.** contributed to the development of the concept, collected and analysed data, and wrote the draft and final versions of the article. **R.A.** contributed to the development of the concept, and reviewed the draft and final article. **N.J.** contributed to the development of the concept reviewed the draft and final article. **W.A.** contributed to the development of the concept, reviewed the draft and final article. **G.B.** contributed to the development of the concept, and reviewed the draft and final article. **H.H.** contributed to the development of the concept and data analysis and reviewed the draft and final article. **E.N.** contributed to the development of the concept and reviewed the draft and final article. **A. Alemu.** contributed to the development of the concept reviewed the draft and final article. **A. Abdissa.** contributed to the development of the concept and reviewed the draft and final article. **G.K.G.** contributed to the development of the concept reviewed the draft and final article. **S.M.G.** contributed to the development of the concept reviewed the draft and final article. **N.M.** contributed to the development of the concept reviewed the draft and final article. **K.M.** contributed to the development of the concept and data analysis and reviewed the draft and final article. **E.J.K.** contributed to the development of the concept and data analysis and reviewed the draft and final article.

Funding

The project was funded by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Ref. LSHTM 102685ED and EPIDZN83). In addition, the project on which this publication is based was partly supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant No. 01KA2220B) through the NORA Programme, and by the Science for Africa Foundation under Programme Del-22-008, with support from the Welcome Trust and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. It forms part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring that all research involving human participants adhered to ethical standards.

The study protocol received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Jimma University, Institute of Health (ref. IHRPHD/308/23). For the retrospective review of medical records, the IRB granted a waiver of individual informed consent due to the minimal risk associated with the study and the absence of direct patient interaction.

For participants whose disease outcome information was not accessible in the records, verbal informed consent was obtained from either the patients or their caregivers prior to conducting brief phone interviews. During data entry, all data were de-identified to maintain participant confidentiality.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Collado JJ, Gómez D, Muñoz J, de Bosch FX. SS Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases Report. ICO/IARC HPV Inf Cent. 2023;(Summary Report 10 March). Available from: https://www.hpvcentre.net.
  • 2.Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):169–82. Available from: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Jedy-Agba E, Joko WY, Liu B, Buziba NG, Borok M, Korir A et al. Trends in cervical cancer incidence in sub-Saharan Africa. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(1):148–54. Available from: 10.1038/s41416-020-0831-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Singh D, Vignat J, Lorenzoni V, Eslahi M, Ginsburg O, Lauby-Secretan B et al. Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: a baseline analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative. Lancet Glob Heal. 2023;11(2):e197–206. Available from: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00501-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Collado JJ, Gómez D, Muñoz J. Bosch FX de SS. Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in ethiopia. ICO/IARC HPV Information Centre; 2023.
  • 6.Yeshitila YG, Desta M, Getaneh T, Yeserah B, Worku Y, Eshete T et al. Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(11 November):1–22. Available from: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Ayenew AA, Zewdu BF, Nigussie AA. Uptake of cervical cancer screening service and associated factors among age-eligible women in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Agent Cancer. 2020;15(1):67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dereje N, Addissie A, Worku A, Assefa M, Abraha A, Tigeneh W, et al. Extent and predictors of delays in diagnosis of cervical cancer in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A population-based prospective study. J Glob Oncol. 2020;6:277–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Deressa BT, Assefa M, Tafesse E, Kantelhardt EJ, Soldatovic I, Cihoric N, et al. Contemporary treatment patterns and survival of cervical cancer patients in Ethiopia. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saleem A, Bekele A, Fitzpatrick MB, Mahmoud EA, Lin AW, Velasco HE et al. Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer in Southwestern Ethiopia is lacking: A descriptive analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):1–11. Available from: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Jibat N, Ali R, Adissu W, Buruh G, Abdissa A, Goba GK et al. Less known but greatly feared: Cervical cancer in Ethiopia community awareness. Heliyon. 2024;10(7):e28328. Available from: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Bray F, Carstensen B, Møller H, Zappa M, Žakelj MP, Lawrence G, et al. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(9):2191–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Castanon A, Landy R, Sasieni PD. Is cervical screening preventing adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(5):1040–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang M, Huang K, Wong MCS, Huang J, Jin Y, Zheng ZJ. Global Cervical Cancer Incidence by Histological Subtype and Implications for Screening Methods. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024;14(1):94–101. Available from: 10.1007/s44197-023-00172-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Shivamurthy SK, Lethika RD, Madabhavi IV. Clinicopathological Profile, Treatment Response and Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in North Karnataka. Asian Pac J Cancer Care. 2022;7(2):213–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lacika JL, Wabinga H, Kagaayi J, Opito R, Orach CG, Mwaka AD. Diagnostic and pre-treatment intervals among patients with cervical cancer attending care at the Uganda Cancer Institute: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaseka PU, Kayira A, Chimbatata CS, Chisale MRO, Kamudumuli P, Wu TSJ, et al. Histopathological profile of cervical biopsies in northern Malawi: A retrospective cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shaffi AF, Odongo EB, Itsura PM, Tonui PK, Mburu AW, Hassan AR et al. Cervical cancer management in a low resource setting: A 10-year review in a tertiary care hospital in Kenya. Gynecol Oncol Reports. 2024;51(November 2023):101331. Available from: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.Yusuf FZ, Kebede T, Abera MT, Bedane A, Getachew A, Abrar S. Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2024;34(1):17–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tirkaso BH, Bayisa TH, Desta TW. Histopathologic patterns and factors associated with cervical lesions at Jimma University Medical Center, Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia: A two-year cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2024;19(4 APRIL):1–17. Available from: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Ameya G, Yerakly F. Characteristics of cervical disease among symptomatic women with histopathological sample at Hawassa University referral hospital, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.World Health Organization. Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. United Nations Gen Assembly. 2020;2:1–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zewdie A, Shitu S, Kebede N, Gashaw A, Eshetu HB, Eseyneh T et al. Determinants of late-stage cervical cancer presentation in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):1–9. Available from: 10.1186/s12885-023-11728-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Federal Ministry of Health. Guideline for cervical cancer prevention and control in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Federal Ministry of Health; 2021. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/ncdccs/Data/ETH_D1_Cervical%20cancer%20guideline-Print%20version.pdfFMOH.
  • 25.Gyenwali D, Khanal G, Paudel R, Amatya A, Pariyar J, Onta SR. Estimates of delays in diagnosis of cervical cancer in Nepal. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ouasmani F, Hanchi Z, Rahou BH, Bekkali R, Benazzouz B, Mesfioui A. The Measurement of Delay in Diagnosis and Treatment among Moroccan Women with Cervical Cancer. Cancer Oncol Res. 2017;5(1):10–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Weller D, Vedsted P, Rubin G, Walter FM, Emery J, Scott S et al. The Aarhus statement: Improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(7):1262–7. Available from: 10.1038/bjc.2012.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Usman MA, Otene SA. Clinicopathologic features of cervical cancer patients seen in a comprehensive cancer centre in north-western nigeria. Open J Med Res. 2021;2(1):56–65. 10.52417/ojmr.v2i1.211. (ISSN: 2734-2093).
  • 29.Nartey Y, Hill PC, Amo-Antwi K, Nyarko KM, Yarney J, Cox B. Cervical cancer in the Greater Accra and Ashanti Regions of Ghana. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3(6):782–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rudd P, Gorman D, Meja S, Mtonga P, Jere Y, Chidothe I, et al. Cervical cancer in southern Malawi: A prospective analysis of presentation, management and outcomes. Malawi Med J. 2017;29(2):124–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Swedo EA, Sumner SA, Msungama W, Massetti GM, Kalanda M, Saul J et al. Childhood Violence Is Associated with Forced Sexual Initiation Among Girls and Young Women in Malawi: A Cross-Sectional Survey. J Pediatr. 2019;208:265–272.e1. Available from: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Appiah-Kubi A, Konney TO, Amo-Antwi K, Tawiah A, Nti MK, Ankobea-Kokroe F, et al. Factors associated with late-stage presentation of cervical cancer in Ghana. Ghana Med J. 2022;56(2):86–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Friebel-Klingner TM, Luckett R, Bazzett-Matabele L, Ralefala TB, Monare B, Nassali MN et al. Clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with late stage cervical cancer diagnosis in Botswana. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):1–9. Available from: 10.1186/s12905-021-01402-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.de Fouw M, Boere MWM, Nakisige C, Nabwire M, Namugga J, Luutu I et al. Cervical cancer care at a tertiary oncology facility in Uganda: Comparing daily practice with national treatment targets on cervical cancer control. PLoS One. 2025;20(1):1–15. Available from: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Swanson M, Nakalembe M, Chen LM, Ueda S, Namugga J, Nakisige C, et al. Surgical candidacy and treatment initiation among women with cervical cancer at public referral hospitals in Kampala, Uganda: a descriptive cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e039946. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Awolude OA, Oyerinde SO. Invasive cervical cancer in Ibadan: Socio-sexual characteristics, clinical stage at presentation, histopathology distributions and HIV status. Afr J Infect Dis. 2019;13(1):32–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dunyo P, Effah K, Udofia EA. Correction to: Factors associated with late presentation of cervical cancer cases at a district hospital: a retrospective study (BMC Public Health (2018)18 (1156) DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6065-6). BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Begoihn M, Mathewos A, Aynalem A, Wondemagegnehu T, Moelle U, Gizaw M et al. Cervical cancer in Ethiopia – predictors of advanced stage and prolonged time to diagnosis. 2019;4:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Alegbeleye JO, Nyeche S, Jaja MA. Socio-demographic and clinico-pathological analysis of cervical cancer patients at a tertiary care centre in South-south Nigeria. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2023;12(6):1538–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Burmeister CA, Khan SF, Schäfer G, Mbatani N, Adams T, Moodley J, et al. Cervical cancer therapies: Current challenges and future perspectives. Tumour Virus Res. 2022;13:200238. 10.1016/j.tvr.2022.200238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Kantelhardt EJ, Moelle U, Begoihn M, Addissie A, Trocchi P, Yonas B, et al. Cervical Cancer in Ethiopia: Survival of 1,059 Patients Who Received Oncologic Therapy. Oncologist. 2014;19(7):727–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Diver EJ, Hinchcliff EM, Gockley AA, Melamed A, Contrino L, Feldman S, et al. Assessment of treatment factors and clinical outcomes in cervical cancer in older women compared to women under 65 years old. J Geriatr Oncol. 2018;9(5):516–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Randall TC, Ghebre R. Challenges in prevention and care delivery for women with cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa. Front Oncol. 2016;6(JUN):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sharma C, Deutsch I, Horowitz DP, Hershman DL, Lewin SN, Lu YS, et al. Patterns of care and treatment outcomes for elderly women with cervical cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(14):3618–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Robin TP, Amini A, Schefter TE, Behbakht K, Fisher CM. Disparities in standard of care treatment and associated survival decrement in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143(2):319–25. Available from: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 46.Albert A, Lee A, Allbright R, Vijayakumar S. Impact of age on receipt of curative treatment for cervical cancer: an analysis of patterns of care and survival in a large, national cohort. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019;10(3):465–74. Available from: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 47.Quinn BA, Deng X, Colton A, Bandyopadhyay D, Carter JS, Fields EC. Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival. Brachytherapy. 2019;18(1):29–37. Available from: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 48.Chiew KL, Chong S, Duggan KJ, Kaadan N, Vinod SK. Assessing guideline adherence and patient outcomes in cervical cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(5):e373–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nigussie T, Asefa A, Nigusse A, Admassu B. Knowledge Toward Cervical Cancer and Its Determinants Among Women Aged 30–49 in Jimma Town, Southwest Ethiopia. Cancer Control. 2020;27(1):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Geremew AB, Gelagay AA, Azale T. Comprehensive knowledge on cervical cancer, attitude towards its screening and associated factors among women aged 30–49 years in Finote Selam town, northwest Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Murfin J, Irvine F, Meechan-Rogers R, Swift A. Education, income and occupation and their influence on the uptake of cervical cancer prevention strategies: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(3–4):393–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sivaranjini K, Oak A, Cheulkar S, Maheshwari A, Mahantshetty U, Dikshit R. Role of Education and Income on Disparities of Time–to–Treatment Initiation and its Impact on Cervical Cancer Survival. Indian J Public Health. 2023;67(2):235–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ferreira da Silva I, Ferreira da Silva I, Koifman RJ. Cervical Cancer Treatment Delays and Associated Factors in a Cohort of Women From a Developing Country. J Glob Oncol. 2019;2019(5):1–11. Available from: 10.1200/JGO.18.00199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 54.Hernández Vargas JA, Ramírez Barbosa PX, V albuena-Garcia AM, Acuña L, González-Diaz JA. Factors associated with delays in time to treatment initiation in Colombian women with cervical cancer: A cross-sectional analysis. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021;35:100697. 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 55.Shen SC, Hung YC, Kung PT, Yang WH, Wang YH, Tsai WC. Factors involved in the delay of treatment initiation for cervical cancer patients: A nationwide population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(33):e4568. 10.1097/MD.0000000000004568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES