Abstract
The thermal conditions experienced during development can affect host-associated microbial communities. We still know little about whether such effects similarly persist across life stages between different species. In particular, it is unclear if the bacterial communities of closely interacting species, such as hosts and their endoparasitoids, exhibit similar responses to thermal conditions. We reared two generations of the Melitaea cinxia butterfly and its specialised parasitoid wasp, Hyposoter horticola, at three temperatures in the laboratory (26°C, 28°C, and 31°C). We found that the two species harbour different bacterial communities as adults, with the parasitoid exhibiting higher bacterial richness than its host butterfly. When the parental generation of the butterfly was exposed to high temperatures, the F1 generation exhibited increased bacterial richness but a reduced diversity (Shannon index). The opposite effect was observed for its parasitoid, but only for the wasps infected with Wolbachia, which appears sensitive to thermal conditions. Collectively, these results highlight that the bacterial communities of insect hosts and their parasitoids are distinct units, differently susceptible to environmental thermal conditions, particularly to temperatures experienced at the parental generation.
Keywords: trophic interactions, koinobiont, microbiota, microbial symbiosis, Wolbachia, climate change
Insect hosts and their parasitoids harbour distinct microbiota that respond differently to thermal conditions, with parental temperatures and Wolbachia infection partly shaping these effects.
Introduction
The microbial communities associated with insects, commonly referred to as the microbiota, encompass communities of bacteria, archaea, fungi, protozoa, and microalgae (Berg et al. 2020), which are structured by biotic and abiotic factors (Douglas 2015). The host identity often plays a key role (Malacrinò 2022), with the microbiota often reflecting the ecological niche and the dietary specialisation of each insect species (Ludington 2024). For example, symbiotic microbes can supplement their aphid and bedbug hosts’ diet with essential nutrients, such as amino acids and vitamins (Hansen and Moran 2011, Serrato-Salas and Gendrin 2023), or contribute to digestion and detoxification by herbivorous caterpillars and beetle larvae (Jing et al. 2020). Diet composition itself can also strongly shape microbial communities; for example, in honeybees, a pollen-based diet has been shown to support more diverse bacterial communities than a nectar-based diet (Kešnerová et al. 2020). Additionally, shifts in the microbiota of insects occur throughout their life cycle and development. Although early life microbial colonisation can determine the associated microbial community composition in later stages (Sprockett et al. 2018, Debray et al. 2022), each life stage presents distinct physiological and nutritional demands, which can drive changes in microbial communities (English and Barreaux 2020, Kingsolver and Buckley 2020, Brueggemann et al. 2025). This is particularly evident in holometabolous insects, which undergo complete metamorphosis through the larval, pupal, and adult stages. For example, in the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), bacterial communities are dominated by Pantoea in caterpillars, Enterobacter in pupae, and Asaia in adults (Sanaei et al. 2024).
Temperature is a key abiotic factor affecting insect-associated microbial communities (Moghadam et al. 2018, Sepulveda and Moeller 2020, Iltis et al. 2022). In the laboratory, Drosophila melanogaster flies reared at cool temperatures (13°C) exhibit more diverse bacterial communities than those reared under warmer conditions (31°C). Similarly, high temperatures have been shown to negatively affect the titer of the bacterial symbiont Wolbachia in Drosophila spp. (Lau et al. 2020, Hague et al. 2022); and differences in Wolbachia titer are known to have cascading effects on the abundance of other bacterial families, including Spiroplasmataceae, Lactobacillaceae, and Acetobacteraceae (Simhadri et al. 2017, Fromont et al. 2019). Such shifts in the host-associated bacterial composition can lead to functional changes, with potential consequences for host reproduction and survival (Werren et al. 2008), and for the fitness of their offspring (Funkhouser and Bordenstein 2013). Although the transgenerational effects of parental environmental conditions are common in various insect life-history traits (Saastamoinen et al. 2013, Sánchez-Tójar et al. 2020), how temperature experienced at any life stage may impact the composition and species richness of bacterial communities associated with subsequent life stages or generations of the insect hosts remains generally unclear.
Koinobiont endoparasitoids are insects that lay their eggs inside other arthropods, with larvae developing within the host while allowing the host to continue growing until parasitoid pupation, which ultimately results in host death (Godfray 1994). Although adult parasitoids are free-living, this intimate developmental association creates prolonged physiological and ecological interaction between host and parasitoid. Studies on endoparasitoid-associated bacterial microbiota suggest that hosts and their endoparasitoids can harbour similar communities. For example, parasitoid larvae of the species Cotesia vestalis and Diadromus collaris have been shown to share similar gut bacterial communities with each other and with their shared lepidopteran host, Plutella xylostella (Hu et al. 2024). Such similarity may arise because endoparasitoids develop within host tissues, and are exposed to host-associated microbial communities and metabolites. This may facilitate microbial transfer or convergence toward shared microbial pools if microbes persist across metamorphosis (Gao et al. 2021, Gloder et al. 2021, Hu et al. 2024). Conversely, divergence in parasitoid–host microbiota may result from species-specific physiological and immune filtering, extensive microbial loss during complete metamorphosis, or differences in adult diet and behaviour (Hammer et al. 2014, Malacrinò 2022, Manthey et al. 2023). Although several studies have compared the bacterial microbiota of parasitoids and their hosts (Gao et al. 2021, Gloder et al. 2021, Ashraf et al. 2022, Wang et al. 2023, 2024, Gwokyalya et al. 2024, Hu et al. 2024), the stability of these host–parasitoid microbiota relationships across environmental contexts and life stages remains unclear. In particular, environmental stressors, including temperature experienced during development or across generations, may alter bacterial assembly processes, potentially reinforcing species-specific filtering or, alternatively, promoting parallel responses in hosts and parasitoids through shared microbial pools or constrained physiological responses. Direct comparisons of host and parasitoid bacterial microbiota under controlled and ecologically relevant environmental conditions are therefore needed to demonstrate how environmental history interacts with intimate biotic interactions to structure insect-associated bacterial communities.
The Glanville fritillary butterfly, Melitaea cinxia (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), its specialist parasitoid wasp Hyposoter horticola (Gravenhorst, 1829) (Ichneumonidae: Campoplaginae) and their primary host plant, Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae), are found across Europe and northern Asia (Kuussaari et al. 2004, van Nouhuys and Hanski 2004, Couchoux et al. 2016). In the Åland Islands, Finland, these species and their interactions have been the focus of extensive ecological and evolutionary research over the past three decades (Ehrlich and Hanski 2004, Duplouy et al. 2015, Opedal et al. 2020). Both the host butterfly and the endoparasitoid wasp are univoltine in northern Europe. Butterfly eggs are laid in clutches in early summer, and the caterpillars develop in gregarious sibling groups throughout summer and fall. They diapause in groups over the winter and then continue to feed until pupation in the spring (Kuussaari et al. 2004). Hyposoter horticola parasitise newly formed M. cinxia caterpillars just before they hatch from the eggs. The parasitoid larvae then develop within caterpillar hosts until just before pupation occurs in the following spring (van Nouhuys and Lei 2004).
Although the temperate maritime climate of the Åland Islands is characterised by cool summers and mild winters, in recent years, the region has experienced increasing temperatures and more frequent droughts (Kahilainen et al. 2022). High temperatures and drought have been associated with a reduction in survival and fitness in M. cinxia caterpillars due to desiccation and changes in host plant quality (Nieminen et al. 2004, Tack et al. 2015, Salgado et al. 2020). The environmental change affects the dynamics of the parasitoid population primarily through its effects on the dynamics of the host butterfly population dynamics (Nair et al. 2018).
The bacterial community of M. cinxia has been suggested to be transient and facultative, acquired primarily from the environment, rather than consisting of resident and obligate endosymbionts (Minard et al. 2019). The composition of the bacterial microbiota of M. cinxia caterpillars has been shown to differ depending on the host food plant species, environmental conditions, and exposure to pathogens (Minard et al. 2019). For example, fungal or viral infections in host plants across Åland can alter the microbial communities available to M. cinxia caterpillars, potentially influencing their health and development (Laine 2004, Susi and Laine 2021). The bacterial microbiota of H. horticola remains largely uncharacterized other than the vertically transmitted endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia (Duplouy et al. 2015, 2021; van Nouhuys et al. 2016). In Åland, this infection persists at a stable intermediate level of about 50% of the population across the years (Duplouy et al. 2015, 2021), likely due to a balance of costs and benefits of infection (Karisto et al. 2022). The bacterium is not found in the host butterfly (Jones et al. 2025). Minard et al. (2019) showed that M. cinxia caterpillars containing H. horticola larvae had a different bacterial microbiota than unparasitized caterpillars, likely reflecting a mixture of bacterial communities from both the caterpillar and the Wolbachia-infected developing H. horticola larvae.
Here, we investigated how parasitoidism and temperature conditions across generations and development influence the insect-associated bacterial community. We exposed two generations of the butterfly M. cinxia and its specialist parasitoid H. horticola to three rearing temperatures in a cross-sectional experimental setup. We addressed two questions: (i) How does the bacterial community differ between a butterfly host and its specialist parasitoid at the adult stage? and (ii) How do temperature conditions experienced by the parents and across developmental stages (prediapause vs. postdiapause caterpillar stages) influence the bacterial communities of adult offspring of these two interacting species? Because H. horticola is a specialist parasitoid of M. cinxia caterpillars, the intimate developmental association of the parasitoid larvae with the host caterpillar may promote similarity in bacterial microbiota between host and parasitoid through shared microbial exposure. Under this scenario, thermal stress would be expected to induce similar changes in the bacterial microbiota of F1 individuals of both species. Alternatively, host and parasitoid bacterial microbiota may diverge as a result of species-specific physiological, immunological, or ecological filtering, such that thermal stress affects the bacterial community of each species independently. Through these contrasting expectations, we assess whether shared ecology or species identity plays the dominant role in structuring the bacterial microbiota in this host–parasitoid system.
Material and methods
Experimental design
In the laboratory, M. cinxia was fed exclusively on P. lanceolata plants grown at 25°C in the greenhouse. The plants were fertilised with 100 ml of 0.02% Neko NPK solution once a week. The plants were also watered and sprayed with soap and sodium bicarbonate solution 3 days a week to avoid aphids and fungal infestations. All pre- and postdiapause caterpillars were provided ad libitum P. lanceolata leaves on a daily basis, while adult insects were fed 30% honey water on a sterilised sponge once a day.
Parental generation (F0)
The first generation (F0) of M. cinxia (N = 370) was collected in the Åland archipelago, southwest Finland, in the fall of 2020, when the caterpillars were in the early stage of diapause. All specimens received a unique identifier upon collection in the field (Ojanen et al. 2013). The diapausing M. cinxia caterpillars were kept at 5°C, 24 h dark, with constant 80% humidity in an incubator (Climacell 222 L, MMM Group), from early 2020 fall until the following spring 2021. To break the diapause, caterpillars were exposed to a 12:12 h light:dark cycle, followed by a gradual increase in temperature over 3 days: from 15°C:8°C day:night temperatures, to 20°C:13°C, and finally 28°C:18°C. The prediapause caterpillars were then individually reared in plastic containers at 28°C:18°C. About one-third of these caterpillars were naturally parasitised by H. horticola, some of which were further hyperparasitized by Mesochorus cf. stigmaticus (van Nouhuys and Hanski 2004, Montovan et al. 2015). When caterpillars or parasitoid larvae pupated, they were split into three temperature treatments until the emergence of adults: 26°C:18°C (mean = 22°C; F026), 28°C:18°C (mean = 23°C; F028), or 31°C:18°C (mean = 24.5°C; F031) (Fig. 1). All experimental temperatures are representative of a range of microclimatic conditions that caterpillars experience naturally at the ground level in Åland during spring and summer (Kuussaari et al. 2004, Saastamoinen 2007, Duplouy and Hanski 2015). Upon emergence, adult butterflies were labelled on their wings with a unique number and moved to 27 L mesh cloth cages (with a maximum of 10 individuals per cage, separated by sex), while adult wasps were kept in individual 100 ml containers, inside incubators and under their respective temperature treatment. Adult female H. horticola wasps reach reproductive maturation after 10–12 days (Montovan et al. 2015, Couchoux et al. 2016).
Figure 1.
Cross-sectional experimental design used over the parental (F0) and offspring (F1) generations. The F0 caterpillars were collected in the Åland Islands, Finland, in the fall of 2020, and the F1 generation was born and reared under laboratory conditions. N represents the total number of individuals that survived in each developmental stage, while N* represents the number of individuals selected for DNA extraction. All adult H. horticola specimens were used for DNA extraction (N = N*).
Melitaea cinxia butterflies mated under natural sunlight in the greenhouse (average temperature was 25°C). We recorded the IDs of each mating pair, and then the mated females were each offered a potted host plant to lay eggs on. Plants carrying egg clutches were set aside and kept at 25°C for a week. Then, when caterpillars were nearly ready to hatch from the eggs, they were offered for parasitisation by manually placing a mature F0 female H. horticola wasp (N = 9) on the M. cinxia egg clutch using a mouth aspirator (Montovan et al. 2015). We observed oviposition by each wasp to ensure parasitism occurred. Hyposoter horticola has been described to not mate in the lab, therefore, all female wasps remained unmated and thus laid only unfertilized haploid eggs, which developed into males through parthenogenesis (van Nouhuys and Ehrnsten 2004). No wasps emerged from the F031 treatment. Although this treatment was maintained for M. cinxia (Table S2), the data were later excluded from this study for simplicity and to allow direct comparison between species (Fig. 1). To investigate the failure of parasitoid development in the F031 treatment group, we dissected all deceased F031 caterpillars to check for the presence of dead H. horticola. When possible, we assessed the developmental stage at death using a Leica Z16 macroscope and a Flexacam C3 at the Finnish Museum of Natural History (LUOMUS).
Offspring generation (F1)
We divided all large butterfly egg clutches (>60 eggs) parasitised by H. horticola into two clutches of similar size. We randomly assigned each half of the clutches to the 26°C or 28°C temperature treatment. Small egg clutches (<60 eggs) parasitised by H. horticola were not split as young caterpillars kept in small groups have low survival (Kuussaari et al. 2004, Saastamoinen 2007, Duplouy and Hanski 2015). These small clutches were randomly assigned to the 26°C or 28°C temperature treatments. The butterflies in the F026 treatment only laid one small egg clutch, which was assigned to 28°C (Fig. 1). After breaking the diapause in the fall of 2021, postdiapause caterpillars from each temperature treatment were divided into smaller groups of 15–25 individuals that were randomly assigned to 26°C or 28°C temperature treatments until pupation and emergence of a parasitoid wasp or a butterfly host (Fig. 1). Adults (F1) from the final eight treatment groups (Fig. 1) were killed within 24 h after emergence by placing them at −20°C for 24 h. All specimens were transferred into individual Eppendorf tubes filled with 99% ethanol and labelled with their unique identification number.
DNA extraction and sequencing
Each adult specimen was individually surface washed twice, by dipping it in two consecutive 10X-Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) baths. The abdomen was cut off with a sterile blade and air-dried in a sterile hood environment for 2–4 h. DNA extractions were performed using a tissue kit on the ChemagicTM 360 Nucleic Acid Extractor (PerkinElmer, USA) at the Molecular Ecology and Systematics (MES) Laboratory, at the University of Helsinki. We amplified the hypervariable V5–V6 bacterial region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rrs) gene by Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers 784F (5′-AGGATTAGATACCCTGGTA) and 1061R (5′-CRRCACGAGCTGACGAC) (Toft and Andersson 2010). Each specimen was amplified in duplicate. Each PCR reaction (18 µl total volume) contained 3 µl of DNA extract, 3.6 µl of 5x Q5 Reaction Buffer (New England Biolabs, USA), 3.6 µl of Q5 High GC Enhancer (New England Biolabs), 0.36 µl of dNTPs (2 mM), 0.1 µl of T4 gene 32 protein (10 mg/ml; New England Biolabs), 0.36 µl of bovine serum albumin, 0.36 µl of each primer (10 µM), 0.15 µl of Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (2000 U/ml; New England Biolabs), and 6.95 µl of nuclease-free water. The PCR conditions were: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 1 min 40 s, 54.2°C for 1 min 45 s, 72°C for 1 min 40 s, and a final extension step of 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products of the same specimen were then pooled together (Duplouy et al. 2018, 2020), and sent for library preparation and sequencing at the Genomics NGS Sequencing unit, at the Finnish Institute for Molecular Medicine (FIMM), University of Helsinki. Sequencing was performed on a MiSeq v.3. Sequencing platform (Illumina, USA) using both reverse and forward primers. Raw sequencing data are available in NBCI under the accession code PRJNA1227207.
Curation of amplicon sequencing data
To characterise the bacterial communities from M. cinxia and H. horticola samples in each temperature treatment, all 16S rRNA gene amplicons were processed using a home-developed pipeline based on USEARCH/VSEARCH (available at https://github.com/Symbiosis-JU/Bioinformatic-pipelines/blob/main/Example_analysis.md). Quality-filtered forward and reverse reads for both bins were assembled into contigs using PEAR (Zhang et al. 2014). Contigs were dereplicated (Rognes et al. 2016) and denoised (Edgar 2016). Chimeric sequences were removed after detection using USEARCH (Edgar 2010). The exact sequence variants (zOTU) of the 16S amplicons were clustered using the UPARSE-OTU algorithm implemented in USEARCH. The bacterial taxonomy was then assigned using the SINTAX algorithm and the SILVA database (version 138 SSU). Bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicons were also screened for putative DNA extraction and PCR reagent contaminants, using negative controls (TE buffer blanks) as reference. After removing contamination, we normalised the data using Total Sum Scaling (TSS) and removed zOTU with a read count lower than 10 per sample.
Statistical analyses
We used R version 4.4.0 (R Core Team 2018) for all statistical analyses. Data visualisation was done using the ggplot 2 3.4.4 package (Wickham 2011) in tidyverse 1.3.1 (Wickham et al. 2019).
To compare the bacterial communities associated with M. cinxia and H. horticola, we calculated Bray–Curtis, unweighted and weighted UniFrac distance matrices using the R package phyloseq 1.41.1 (McMurdie and Holmes 2013). In contrast with Bray–Curtis distance, both UniFrac distances account for the phylogenetic relatedness of zOTUs, but only the weighted UniFrac distance incorporates zOTU abundances (Lozupone and Knight 2005). To build the phylogenetic tree that was incorporated into the phyloseq object, we aligned the sequences and built a UPGMA tree (Sokal 1958) using MAFFT online service v7 (Katoh and Standley 2013, Katoh et al. 2019). Then, we tested for differences in bacterial composition using the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) (Anderson 2001) test using the function adonis2 with 10 000 permutations. First, we tested the effects of insect species and generation as fixed explanatory variables, including the M. cinxia and H. horticola F0 and F1 samples. Because bacterial composition differed between species and generations, and because the sample size of F0 individuals was small (see Fig. 1), we subsequently focused our analyses on the effects of temperature treatments on the bacterial community of the F1 generation only, and separately for each insect species. Temperature was included in these models as a nested variable, with three levels: the temperature treatment experienced by F1 postdiapause caterpillars was nested within that of F1 prediapause caterpillars, which, in turn, was nested within the temperature treatment experienced by the F0 mother. Because life-history traits in M. cinxia are often found to differ among families (Verspagen et al. 2020), we added the IDs of the F0 mother butterflies or mother wasps as random effects in our models, passing them through the “strata” argument. For the M. cinxia models, sex was also added as a fixed effect. For H. horticola, because Wolbachia is temperature-sensitive (Hague et al. 2020, 2022), we conducted the analyses for H. horticola both using all samples and separately for individuals infected with Wolbachia and those not infected.
We compared the richness of bacterial species (zOTU richness) and the Shannon diversity index between species (M. cinxia versus H. horticola) and generations (F0 and F1) using generalised linear mixed models (GLMM) from the package glmmTMB 1.1.10 (Brooks et al. 2017). We first tested the effects of insect species and generation as fixed explanatory variables, including both the M. cinxia and H. horticola F0 and F1 samples. Then, we examined the effect of temperature on richness and Shannon index separately for the F1 specimens of each insect species, with the nested temperature treatments as fixed explanatory variables. We added the IDs of the F0 mother butterflies and mother wasps as random effects in the models. We used a Poisson distribution to model the richness of bacterial species (count data), and a Gaussian distribution to test variation in the Shannon index. For the M. cinxia models, sex was added as an additional fixed effect. For H. horticola, we performed the analyses considering all the samples and separately for individuals infected with Wolbachia and those that were not.
We selected the best model (PERMANOVA or GLMM) hierarchically, considering variable significance, and choosing the model with the lowest Akaike Information Criteria value, following the information-theoretic approach (Akaike 1998, Burnham and Anderson 2002). To identify bacterial taxa associated with each species and with specific temperature treatments, we conducted an indicator species analysis using the package indicspecies 1.8.0 (De Cáceres and Legendre 2009).
Results
Survival and developmental stages of parasitoids under exposure at 31°C
None of the F0 H. horticola exposed to the 31°C treatment survived. Dissection of the 30 caterpillars from that treatment that died revealed that 26 were clearly parasitised, while four did not contain a detectable parasitoid. Of the 26 parasitised hosts, 23 contained H. horticola and three were hyperparasitized by Mesochorus cf. stigmaticus. Among the H. horticola-parasitised individuals, one was found as a prepupa (Fig. 2A), seven as pupae (Fig. 2B) and 15 as pharate adults (Fig. 2C), indicating that the H. horticola-parasitised individuals died at a late development stage, after killing their hosts.
Figure 2.
Hyposoter horticola exposed to the 31°C treatment died at three late stages of their development. (A) Parasitoid prepupa (specimen AF20-63-1). (B) Parasitoid pupa (specimen AF20-1025-5). (C) Pharate adult H. horticola (specimen AF20-6-12). The scale bar represents 0.25 cm for all images (A–C).
Bacterial communities of Melitaea cinxia versus Hyposoter horticola
We obtained 1 479 zOTUs (2 879 567 reads) for the bacterial microbiota of M. cinxia and 4909 zOTUs (14 579 491 reads) for that of H. horticola before decontamination. After decontamination, 111 zOTUs (1 728 371 reads) remained for the bacterial community of M. cinxia and 129 zOTUs (13 780 536 reads) for that of H. horticola.
The most abundant bacterial taxon detected in M. cinxia was Enterobacter (Proteobacteria) (zOTUs 2 and 8; Fig. 3A). However, this taxon was present in only 11% of all specimens, whereas the remaining individuals harboured a diverse mixture of bacterial taxa. Indicator species analysis identified 36 bacterial zOTUs significantly associated with M. cinxia and 50 zOTUs associated with H. horticola (Table S6). Among the strongest associations for M. cinxia, we observed, for instance, bacteria of the genera Kocuria (zOTU 43) and Rubrobacter (zOTUs 129 and 137) (indicspecies, P = .0001). In contrast, in H. horticola, the proteobacterium Wolbachia (zOTU 1) dominated the bacterial community of all specimens originating from F0 females reared at 28°C (F028), and approximately one-third of the specimens originating from F0 females reared at 26°C (Fig. 3B). Indicator species results for H. horticola, in addition to Wolbachia, included, for example, bacteria of the genera Clostridium (zOTU 23) and Burkholderiales (zOTU 73) (indicspecies, P = .0001).
Figure 3.
Stacked bar plot of the relative abundances of bacterial zOTUs in M. cinxia (A) and H. horticola (B). Each bar represents an insect specimen, with colours indicating the 10 most abundant zOTUs for each species. Letters preceding the zOTU names indicate bacterial phyla: A, Actinobacteriota; F, Firmicutes; and P, Proteobacteria. All other zOTUs are grouped as “Others”. Bars are grouped by temperature treatment, and for M. cinxia (A), they are further organised by sex (F, female and M, male).
The compositions of the bacterial community differed significantly between M. cinxia and H. horticola (PERMANOVA using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity: R² = 0.124, P = .003; Unweighted and weighted UniFrac distance metrics are presented in the Supplementary data) (Fig. 4A, Appendix S1, Table S4). However, both species shared 131 zOTUs, including zOTU 2 (Enterobacter, Proteobacteria), zOTU 7 (Pseudomonas, Proteobacteria), zOTU 8 (Enterobacter, Proteobacteria) and zOTU 11 (Cutibacterium, Actinobacteriota) (Fig. 3). The richness of bacterial species (number of zOTU) associated with the parasitoid was higher than that associated with the butterfly (GLMM: β = 0.324, P = .034) (Fig. 4B). However, the bacterial community of the two host species showed similar Shannon index values (GLMM: β = −0.041, P = .383) (Fig. 4C).
Figure 4.
Microbiota composition, richness, and diversity for M. cinxia and H. horticola. (A) PCoA plot (Bray−Curtis distance) of parental (F0) (squares) and offspring (F1) (crosses) generations of M. cinxia (light colour) and H. horticola (dark colour) (R² = 0.124, P = .003). Ellipses indicate 95% confidence limits for each host species. Arrows highlight F0 specimens. (B) Bacterial species richness (N of zOTUs) and (C.) Shannon index for M. cinxia and H. horticola. Different letters above boxplots indicate significant differences among groups (P < .05).
The bacterial communities of the parental generation (F0) differed significantly in composition from that of the generation of offspring (F1) for both M. cinxia and H. horticola (PERMANOVA Bray–Curtis: R² = 0.015, P = .025) (Fig. 4A, Table S4). However, there was no effect of generation on the richness of bacterial species or the Shannon index (Table S5).
Bacterial communities of M. cinxia and H. horticola under temperature treatments
M. cinxia
The bacterial community composition in M. cinxia differed between sexes, with the microbiota of males showing greater dispersion/heterogeneity than that of females (PERMANOVA Bray–Curtis: R² = 0.016, P = .027) (Fig. 5A, Appendix S2A and C). However, no significant effects of the temperature experienced at the parental generation or during caterpillar pre- or postdiapause periods were observed on the bacterial composition of M. cinxia (Fig. 5B, Appendix S2B and D, Table S4).
Figure 5.
Microbiota composition, richness and Shannon index of adult M. cinxia F1. (A) PCoA plot based on Bray–Curtis distances, showing differences in the microbiota composition between sexes (female = circle, male = triangle) (R² = 0.016, P = .027). (B) PCoA plot using Bray–Curtis distances showing the difference in the microbiota composition according to the temperature experienced by the parental generation (F0) (26°C = circle; 28°C = triangle) (R² = 0.040, P = .102). (C) Richness (N of zOTU) and (D.) Shannon index across the temperature treatment groups (see Table S5 for statistical results).
The richness of bacterial species and the Shannon diversity index of the microbiota of M. cinxia did not differ between sexes (Appendix S3, Table S5), but were affected by temperature. The bacterial species richness of offspring (F1) was greater if the F1 samples were from mothers reared at 28°C compared to 26°C (GLMM: β = 1.088, P < .001). There were also significant three-way interactions between the temperatures of the parental, prediapause clutch, and postdiapause group, suggesting that different temperature combinations may influence the richness of bacterial species in adult butterflies in complex ways (Fig. 5C, Table S5). The Shannon index was lower for the offspring of mothers at high temperature (28°C) (GLMM: β = −0.223, P = .003), suggesting a reduced bacterial diversity when parents were exposed to higher temperatures. Finally, two significant three-way interactions between parental, prediapause, and postdiapause temperature treatments suggest that developmental stages may play a role in shaping bacterial diversity, as measured by the Shannon index (F028-F126-28, GLMM: β = 0.157, P < .001; F026-F128-28, GLMM: β = −0.189, P = .043) (Fig. 5D, Table S5).
Indicator species analysis for M. cinxia identified a small number of zOTUs associated with individual treatment groups (N = 9). However, these associations were uneven and limited to single treatments (Table S6). No indicator taxa were shared across temperature treatments, showing an absence of consistent treatment-specific bacterial associations.
H. horticola
Bacterial composition and diversity of Wolbachia-infected versus uninfected H. horticola
The bacterial communities in the parasitoid wasp H. horticola were clearly divided into two types: those infected with the bacterium Wolbachia and those lacking the infection (Fig. 6A, Appendices S4 and S5, Table S4). None of the temperature treatments affected the composition of the bacterial communities associated with F1 H. horticola (Fig. 6A, Table S4).
Figure 6.
Microbiota composition, richness and Shannon index of adult H. horticola F1. (A) PCoA plot using the Bray–Curtis distance. Shapes represent individuals with or without Wolbachia (triangle = Wolbachia present; circle = Wolbachia absent) (R² = 0.455, P = .006), and colours indicate the eight temperature treatments (see Table S4). (B) Richness (N of zOTU) and (C.) Shannon index per temperature treatment for individuals with (dark colour) and without Wolbachia (light colour) (see Table S5 for statistical results).
The richness of bacterial species and the Shannon diversity index differed between H. horticola specimens, with individuals infected with Wolbachia exhibiting a lower richness of bacterial species and a higher Shannon index compared to those without Wolbachia (Fig. 6B and C, Appendix S6, Table S5). Furthermore, the samples infected with Wolbachia showed a wider dispersion in the Shannon index, indicating greater variability in the diversity of their associated bacterial communities, compared to the samples without Wolbachia (Fig. 6B and C, Table S5).
In H. horticola, the indicator species analysis revealed very limited support for treatment-specific bacterial associations, with only two bacteria, Paracoccus (zOTU 8812; indicspecies, P = .028) and Wolbachia (zOTU 17457; indicspecies, P = .027) identified as indicators of a single treatment group (F028-F128-26) (Table S6). No taxa were associated with the other treatments, suggesting that the diverse temperature treatments did not strongly select for consistent or distinct indicator communities.
Effects of temperature on bacterial diversity in Wolbachia-infected and uninfected H. horticola
Wolbachia-infected specimens exhibited lower bacterial species richness when their parents were reared at 28°C (GLMM: β = −2.179, P < .001). The effect of temperature in the parental generation on bacterial richness was further modulated by the temperatures experienced during different stages of the offspring development, with some treatments reducing richness and others increasing it (Table S5). In addition, the Shannon diversity index of Wolbachia-infected individuals was especially high when the parental generation had been reared at 28°C (GLMM: β = 0.253, P = .007). As with species richness, the effect of temperature at the parental generation on the Shannon index of the offspring bacterial community was influenced by temperature conditions across life stages, with some combinations reducing diversity and others enhancing it (Table S5).
In Wolbachia-free specimens, temperature played a role in shaping bacterial diversity. Individuals that experienced a prediapause clutch temperature of 26°C and postdiapause group temperature of 28°C had significantly reduced bacterial richness (GLMM: β = −0.137, P = .004) compared to other treatment groups. Conversely, exposure to 26°C during prediapause was associated with a higher Shannon index (GLMM: β = 0.163, P < .001).
Discussion
By simultaneously exposing the Glanville fritillary butterfly (M. cinxia) and its specialist parasitoid (H. horticola) to different temperatures over two generations, we explored how species and temperature conditions at different developmental stages can shape the bacterial communities associated with a host and its parasitoid.
Host–parasitoid thermal tolerance mismatch
Melitaea cinxia butterflies developed normally within the experimental range of 26°C–31°C, which are temperatures commonly experienced by this species under natural conditions in the Åland Islands (Verspagen et al. 2020). This butterfly species is also known to tolerate prolonged exposure to high temperatures, up to 34°C (Verspagen et al. 2020, 2023). Strikingly, at 31°C, the parasitoid died late in development, after killing its host, either during the final stages of pupation, or while attempting to emerge from the pupal case as an adult. This suggests that the late developmental stage might be the most sensitive stage for the wasp, and that 31°C may be within its upper thermal limit, potentially making this species more sensitive to climate change than its host butterfly. In the field, late-instar M. cinxia caterpillars, which are black, are known to bask in the sun, attaining temperatures far above 31°C (van Nouhuys and Lei 2004), which may be a host behavioural mechanism that could limit parasitoid development prior to parasitoid pupation and host death. Similar patterns between hosts and parasitoids have been observed in other systems. For example, survival of the parasitoid Cotesia congregata in its host Manduca sexta decreased with increasing temperatures, with complete mortality occurring at 30°C ± 10°C, whereas the unparasitized hosts remained unaffected (Moore et al. 2021, Malinski et al. 2023). Such a disparity in the thermal tolerance between host and parasitoids could serve as an enemy escape or enemy release strategy for host insects, allowing their persistence or range expansion in areas where their parasitoids might face decline as they reach their upper thermal tolerance limit (Malinski et al. 2024). As species respond uniquely to environmental stressors, thermal changes might disrupt ecological interactions and threaten parasitoid populations (Malinski et al. 2024). Characterising this discrepancy in the thermal limits between the parasitoid and its host might have some important consequences for the dynamics of such interactions.
The bacterial communities of M. cinxia and H. horticola are host-specific
Although larvae of the parasitoid H. horticola feed and develop entirely within the M. cinxia caterpillar, the two species host distinct bacterial community composition and richness. This is consistent with other host–parasitoid studies, although these typically focus on the larval stage. For example, the bacterial microbiota of the larval parasitoids Cotesia glomerata and Cotesia rubecula differ in composition from that of their host caterpillars, Pieris brassicae and Pieris rapae (Gloder et al. 2024). However, such a difference between trophic levels was not found in a study by Hu et al. (2024) comparing the microbiota of C. vestalis larvae to that of their host, the moth P. xylostella, as both exhibited similar bacterial composition.
In our study, the bacterial communities associated with M. cinxia were dominated by an Enterobacter bacterium (Proteobacteria) and were also consistently associated with the indicator species of the bacterial genera Kocuria and Rubrobacter. Caterpillars of M. cinxia have previously been reported to harbour Enterobacteriaceae. This family comprises taxa commonly associated with animal guts and engaged in diverse host–microbe interactions, ranging from mutualistic to pathogenic (Minard et al. 2019). Kocuria are commonly described as environmental or plant-associated bacteria and have been reported from a range of insect hosts. These include the weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, in which the bacteria show cellulose-degrading capacity (Basavand et al. 2024), cockroaches, where the bacteria exhibit antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (Alkhalifah 2021), and several moth species (Sevim and Sevim 2022). Similarly, Rubrobacter has been reported from the gut of the moth Spodoptera frugiperda, where it might play a putative nutritional role through the degradation of organic substrates (Rozadilla et al. 2020, Fu et al. 2023). In contrast, the bacterial microbiota of the parasitoid exhibited a higher number of zOTUs than M. cinxia, and the parasitoid’s bacterial community was characterised by the indicator species Wolbachia, Clostridium, and members of the Burkholderiales. In H. horticola, Wolbachia does not affect its host fecundity, longevity, nor dispersal (Duplouy et al. 2015). However, it has been shown to increase host susceptibility to hyperparasitism by Mesochorus cf. stigmaticus (van Nouhuys et al. 2016). Broader effects of Wolbachia on parasitoid population dynamics (Duplouy et al. 2021), as well as its sensitivity to temperature, remain unclear. Clostridium has been reported across a wide range of insect taxa (Douillard et al. 2025), and although some Clostridium species are pathogenic to vertebrates, insects could act as vectors in the environment or benefit from their presence through improved digestion or protection against pathogens (Douillard et al. 2025). Finally, bacterial members of Burkholderiales are environmentally acquired symbionts known to confer nutritional benefits, resistance to insecticides, or protection against pathogens in stinkbugs, beetles, and ants (Kaltenpoth and Flórez 2020, Stillson et al. 2022). Together, these results suggest that the indicator taxa identified in M. cinxia and H. horticola may play roles in host nutrition and host protection, although these functions remain to be further tested.
We observed significant differences in community composition between the bacterial microbiota of F0 and F1 generations in both the butterfly and parasitoid, independent of temperature effects. This pattern was indeed expected, since wild F0 and lab-reared F1 insect populations experienced different diets and rearing environments, which are known to strongly influence insect-associated bacterial communities (Tinker and Ottesen 2021). However, interpretation of F0-associated microbiota patterns is necessarily limited because the F0 sample sizes were small due to substantial mortality across developmental stages and limited successful mating or parasitism events, resulting in insufficient replication for robust statistical inference. Consequently, F0 data were used solely to assess broad generational differences. We also noted that in M. cinxia, the bacterial community differed between the sexes and showed greater dispersion (i.e. heterogeneity) in males than in females. However, bacterial species richness and diversity remained similar in both sexes. Therefore, while males and females harbour similar numbers of bacterial taxa, the composition of the community differs, with higher variability in the bacterial communities between male host individuals. These results contrast with previous research on M. cinxia, which found no differences between sexes (Minard et al. 2019). However, the study by Minard et al. (2019) analysed the bacterial microbiota of caterpillars, whereas our study examined the microbiota of adult butterflies. Investigating whether the composition of the bacterial microbiota also differs between M. cinxia and H. horticola at the larval stage, and when such differences could arise during male and female development, are important next steps.
In the parasitoid, Wolbachia dominated the bacterial microbiota of all F1 specimens originating from F0 females reared at 28°C (F028), and approximately one-third of those originating from F0 females reared at 26°C (F026). The higher prevalence observed in F028-derived offspring reflects the maternal infection status, as by chance all three F028 mothers carried Wolbachia, whereas only one of the two F026 mothers was infected. This pattern is consistent with maternal transmission of Wolbachia and aligns with previous findings showing that Wolbachia occurs in approximately half of H. horticola individuals in natural populations from the Åland Islands, Finland (Duplouy et al. 2015, 2021). However, as a limitation of this study, the small number of F0 females prevented us from obtaining uninfected mothers at 28°C. Finally, because all F1 H. horticola individuals in our study were male, we were unable to assess sex-specific effects on the composition, richness, or diversity of their bacterial microbiota, which represents an additional limitation of this study.
In H. horticola, the composition, richness, and diversity of the bacterial microbiota differed depending on the presence or absence of the Wolbachia bacterium (zOTU 1). We observed that the presence of Wolbachia in H. horticola is associated with low bacterial richness but high Shannon diversity. As a highly abundant symbiont, Wolbachia may compete with other bacteria for resources, potentially reducing the number of rare taxa and leading to a more even distribution in the remaining bacterial taxa (Li et al. 2022). However, because we lack absolute bacterial density estimates, inferring resource competition is not possible. Alternatively, these patterns may reflect sequencing artefacts (Wilches et al. 2021), limiting our power to interpret this data.
Temperatures at the parental generation affect bacterial richness in the offspring for both the host and parasitoid
There was little to no effect of temperature treatments on the overall composition of the bacterial microbiota for M. cinxia or H. horticola. However, bacterial richness and Shannon index were significantly affected by the temperature experienced by the parental generation (F0), as well as by temperature treatments in the different larval stages (pre- vs postdiapause larval stage) of the offspring generation (F1).
In both M. cinxia and H. horticola, the thermal conditions experienced by the maternal generation (F0) influenced the microbial species richness and the Shannon index. In M. cinxia, the richness was higher and the Shannon index was lower when the mothers were reared at 28°C. In contrast, the opposite effect was observed in H. horticola: the richness was lower and the Shannon index was higher when the mothers were reared at 28°C compared to 26°C. This suggests that the effects of environmental conditions manifest themselves transgenerationally. If offspring inherit a portion of their bacterial microbiota from their mother (e.g. through egg coating, transovarial transmission, or gut symbionts passed at oviposition), thermal stresses on mothers could shape the initial maternally transmitted bacterial community, which then persists or influences the later development of the offspring microbiota (Guilhot et al. 2023). Alternatively, thermal conditions may affect how the bacterial microbiota of the offspring assembles during early development and after the maternal transmission of the microbes. If the assembly of the bacterial community is more plastic during the early stages of development (when the offspring microbiota is first formed), the temperature experienced by mothers might shape the bacterial community in a way that persists throughout development (Guilhot et al. 2023). To our knowledge, only one study has investigated the transgenerational effects of the insect bacterial microbiota under different temperature treatments. This study, conducted using the cockroach Diploptera punctata, also found that temperatures experienced by the parental generation had a greater effect on the bacterial community associated with the offspring than the temperature experienced by the offspring themselves (Bridson 2020). Future studies could investigate the mechanisms by which parental temperature influences the adult bacterial microbiota of the offspring in the M. cinxia–H. horticola association. Although there were interactions between temperatures at different developmental stages, no single stage appeared to be more sensitive to temperature than the others. This suggests that temperature might have some effect during development, but these effects are not general and would be difficult to interpret without a more focused study.
The lower richness and higher Shannon diversity observed in H. horticola when mothers were reared at 28°C (compared to 26°C) can be explained by the presence of Wolbachia. This is supported by the stronger effects of temperature treatments on both bacterial richness and Shannon index in Wolbachia-infected individuals compared to uninfected ones. These patterns may occur because Wolbachia is more sensitive to temperature fluctuations (Arnold et al. 2019, Hague et al. 2020, Lau et al. 2020) than other bacterial taxa within the parasitoid. This finding aligns with previous research demonstrating that Wolbachia density is temperature dependent (Hague et al. 2020, 2022). Temperature-driven changes in Wolbachia abundance likely influence the overall richness of the parasitoid’s bacterial microbiota and the abundance of the other bacterial species (Li et al. 2022). Again, because our dataset does not include absolute abundance measurements, this interpretation should be taken with caution. Nonetheless, altogether our results underscore that insect hosts and their parasitoids have distinct bacterial communities, which respond differently to thermal conditions, especially those experienced at the parental generation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank colleagues from the Insect Symbiosis Ecology and Evolution and the Life-history Evolution research groups at the University of Helsinki, Finland, for their support during the development of this study. We thank the Åland meadow network surveys, coordinated by Marjo Saastamoinen, for collecting F0 individuals in 2020. We thank Suvi Ikonen for helping with F0 prediapause caterpillars; Sridhar Halali and Aapo Kahilainen for providing extra F0 H. horticola pupae; and Annina Rokka for transporting parasitoid pupae from Lammi Biological Station to the University of Helsinki. We thank Frédéric Guillaume for lending space in the incubators for our diapausing caterpillars, and Timo Saarinen for assisting with the incubators during the experiment. We also thank Leena Grönholm for the greenhouse assistance and Nadja Verspagen for the donation of extra P. lanceolata leaves. We thank Kirsi Kähkönen and Leena Laaksonen for their support with all activities in the MES Lab, and Niko Johansson for assisting with the photographs of dissected caterpillars at the Finnish Museum of Natural History (LUOMUS). Thanks to Tiina Hannunen from the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland for processing the sequencing request. We also acknowledge Ulla Riihimäki and Nadja Verspagen for sharing their caterpillar icons, which we modified for Figure 1, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments, which improved the quality of this manuscript.
Contributor Information
Camila Souza Beraldo, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland; Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, United States.
Diego Castillo Franco, Department of Developmental Biology and Morphology of Invertebrates, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków 30-387, Poland; Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Saskya van Nouhuys, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru560012, India.
Anne Duplouy, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland; Institute for Life Science (HiLIFE), Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00790, Finland.
Author contributions
Camila Souza Beraldo (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Diego Castillo Franco (Data curation, Formal Analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing), Saskya van Nouhuys (Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing), Anne Duplouy (Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding
The project was financially supported by the Wildlife Biology (LUOVA) Doctoral Programme salaried position to C.S.B., and the Research Council of Finland (grant number #321543) and a Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE) fellowship to A.D. SvN acknowledges support from the Israel Institute for Advanced Studies for the research group programme “Mathematical modelling of biological control interactions to support agriculture and conservation”. The Genomics Next-Generation Sequencing unit is supported by HiLIFE and Biocenter Finland. Open access funded by Helsinki University Library. Funding agencies' positions do not reflect the authors’ opinions.
Data availability
Raw sequences are available in NCBI through the accession code PRJNA1227207.
References
- Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G (eds), Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. New York: Springer, 1998, 199–213. [Google Scholar]
- Alkhalifah DHM. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of bacterial symbionts isolated from wild field cockroach Blattella vaga from Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28:6239–44. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson MJ. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001;26:32–46. [Google Scholar]
- Arnold PA, Levin SC, Stevanovic AL et al. Drosophila melanogaster infected with Wolbachia strain wMelCS prefer cooler temperatures. Ecol Entomol. 2019;44:287–90. 10.1111/een.12696. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ashraf HJ, Ramos Aguila LC, Akutse KS et al. Comparative microbiome analysis of Diaphorina citri and its associated parasitoids Tamarixia radiata and Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis reveals Wolbachia as a dominant endosymbiont. Environ Microbiol. 2022;24:1638–52. 10.1111/1462-2920.15948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basavand F, Khani A, Yaghubi S et al. Investigation on gut microbiota diversity of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier (Coleoptera: curculionidae) larvae. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci. 2024;51:294–301. 10.1134/s106235902360352x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome. 2020;8:103. 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bridson C. Interactions between insect gut microbiotas and the environment. PhD Thesis, The University of Manchester; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Brooks M, Kristensen K, van Benthem K et al. GlmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 2017;9:378. 10.32614/RJ-2017-066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brueggemann L, Singh P, Müller C. Life stage- and sex-specific sensitivity to nutritional stress in a holometabolous insect. Ecol Evol. 2025;15. 10.1002/ece3.70764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. 2nd edn. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (eds). New York: Springer, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Couchoux C, Seppä P, van Nouhuys S. Strong dispersal in a parasitoid wasp overwhelms habitat fragmentation and host population dynamics. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:3344–55. 10.1111/mec.13696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Debray R, Herbert RA, Jaffe AL et al. Priority effects in microbiome assembly. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022;20:109–21. 10.1038/s41579-021-00604-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Cáceres M, Legendre P. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology. 2009;90:3566–74. 10.1890/08-1823.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douglas AE. Multiorganismal insects: diversity and function of resident microorganisms. Annu Rev Entomol. 2015;60:17–34. 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douillard FP, Lanzoni O, Duplouy A et al. Insects as natural hosts, vectors and reservoirs of botulinum neurotoxin-producing Clostridia and their non-toxinogenic counterparts: preliminary evidence. Environ Microbiol. 2025;27:e70053. 10.1111/1462-2920.70053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duplouy A, Couchoux C, Hanski I et al. Wolbachia infection in a natural parasitoid wasp population. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134843. 10.1371/journal.pone.0134843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duplouy A, Hanski I. Small spermatophore size and reduced female fitness in an isolated butterfly population. Ecol Entomol. 2015;40:167–74. 10.1111/een.12172. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Duplouy A, Minard G, Lähteenaro M et al. Silk properties and overwinter survival in gregarious butterfly larvae. Ecol Evol. 2018;8:12443–55. 10.1002/ece3.4595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duplouy A, Minard G, Saastamoinen M. The gut bacterial community affects immunity but not metabolism in a specialist herbivorous butterfly. Ecol Evol. 2020;10:8755–69. 10.1002/ece3.6573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duplouy A, Nair A, Nyman T et al. Long-term spatiotemporal genetic structure of an accidental parasitoid introduction, and local changes in prevalence of its associated Wolbachia symbiont. Mol Ecol. 2021;30:4368–80. 10.1111/mec.16065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–1. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar RC. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv. 2016; 081257. [Google Scholar]
- Ehrlich PR, Hanski I. On the Wings of Checkerspots: A Model System for Population Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 10.1093/oso/9780195158274.001.0001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- English S, Barreaux AMG. The evolution of sensitive periods in development: insights from insects. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020;36:71–8. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fromont C, Adair KL, Douglas AE. Correlation and causation between the microbiome, Wolbachia and host functional traits in natural populations of drosophilid flies. Mol Ecol. 2019;28:1826–41. 10.1111/mec.15041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu J, Wang J, Huang X et al. Composition and diversity of gut microbiota across developmental stages of Spodoptera frugiperda and its effect on the reproduction. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1237684. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1237684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funkhouser LJ, Bordenstein SR Mom knows best: the universality of maternal microbial transmission. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001631. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao X, Niu R, Zhu X et al. Characterization and comparison of the bacterial microbiota of Lysiphlebia japonica parasitioid wasps and their aphid host Aphis gosypii. Pest Manag Sci. 2021;77:2710–8. 10.1002/ps.6299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gloder G, Bourne ME, Cuny MAC et al. Caterpillar–parasitoid interactions: species-specific influences on host microbiome composition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024;100. 10.1093/femsec/fiae115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gloder G, Bourne ME, Verreth C et al. Parasitism by endoparasitoid wasps alters the internal but not the external microbiome in host caterpillars. Anim Microbiome. 2021;3. 10.1186/s42523-021-00135-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godfray HCJ. Parasitoids. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. 10.1515/9780691207025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guilhot R, Xuéreb A, Lagmairi A et al. Microbiota acquisition and transmission in Drosophila flies. iScience. 2023;26:107656. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gwokyalya R, Herren JK, Weldon CW et al. Shaping the microbial landscape: parasitoid-driven modifications of Bactrocera dorsalis microbiota. Microb Ecol. 2024;87:81. 10.1007/s00248-024-02393-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hague MTJ, Caldwell CN, Cooper BS. Pervasive effects of Wolbachia on host temperature preference. mBio. 2020;11. 10.1128/mBio.01768-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hague MTJ, Shropshire JD, Caldwell CN et al. Temperature effects on cellular host-microbe interactions explain continent-wide endosymbiont prevalence. Curr Biol. 2022;32:878–88.e8. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammer TJ, McMillan WO, Fierer N. Metamorphosis of a butterfly-associated bacterial community. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86995. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen AK, Moran NA. Aphid genome expression reveals host-symbiont cooperation in the production of amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:2849–54. 10.1073/pnas.1013465108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu N-N, Wang Z-Q, Zhang S-J et al. Characterization of larval gut microbiota of two endoparasitoid wasps associated with their common host, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: plutellidae). Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12. 10.1128/spectrum.01208-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iltis C, Tougeron K, Hance T et al. A perspective on insect–microbe holobionts facing thermal fluctuations in a climate-change context. Environ Microbiol. 2022;24:18–29. 10.1111/1462-2920.15826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jing T-Z, Qi F-H, Wang Z-Y. Most dominant roles of insect gut bacteria: digestion, detoxification, or essential nutrient provision?. Microbiome. 2020;8. 10.1186/s40168-020-00823-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones M, Rastas P, Chacón-Duque JC et al. Recovering ecological interactions by mining non-target data from whole genome re-sequencing projects. bioRxiv. 2025. 10.1101/2025.01.17.633498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kahilainen A, Oostra V, Somervuo P et al. Alternative developmental and transcriptomic responses to host plant water limitation in a butterfly metapopulation. Mol Ecol. 2022;31:5666–83. 10.1111/mec.16178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaltenpoth M, Flórez LV. Versatile and dynamic symbioses between insects and Burkholderia bacteria. Annu Rev Entomol. 2020;65:145–70. 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karisto P, Duplouy A, de Vries C et al. Positive fitness effects help explain the broad range of Wolbachia prevalences in natural populations. Peer Community J. 2022;2. 10.24072/pcjournal.202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1160–6. 10.1093/bib/bbx108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80. 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kešnerová L, Emery O, Troilo M et al. Gut microbiota structure differs between honeybees in winter and summer. ISME J. 2020;14:801–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kingsolver JG, Buckley LB. Ontogenetic variation in thermal sensitivity shapes insect ecological responses to climate change. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2020;41:17–24. 10.1016/j.cois.2020.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuussaari M, van Nouhuys S, Hellmann J. et al. Larval biology of checkerspot butterflies. In: Ehrlich PR., Hanski I (eds), On the Wings of Checkerspots: A Model System for Population Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 138–60. 10.1093/oso/9780195158274.001.0001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Laine A-L. A powdery mildew infection on a shared host plant affects the dynamics of the Glanville fritillary butterfly populations. Oikos. 2004;107:329–37. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12990.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lau M-J, Ross PA, Endersby-Harshman NM et al. Impacts of low temperatures on Wolbachia (Rickettsiales: rickettsiaceae)-infected Aedes aegypti (Diptera: culicidae). J Med Entomol. 2020;57:1567–74. 10.1093/jme/tjaa074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li T-P, Zhou C-Y, Gong J-T et al. Recently introduced Wolbachia reduces bacterial species richness and reshapes bacterial community structure in Nilaparvata lugens. Pest Manag Sci. 2022;78: 1881–94. 10.1002/ps.6806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lozupone C, Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:8228–35. 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ludington WB. The importance of host physical niches for the stability of gut microbiome composition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024;379. 10.1098/rstb.2023.0066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malacrinò A. Host species identity shapes the diversity and structure of insect microbiota. Mol Ecol. 2022;31:723–35. 10.1111/mec.16285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malinski KH, Elizabeth Moore M, Kingsolver JG. Heat stress and host–parasitoid interactions: lessons and opportunities in a changing climate. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2024;64:101225. 10.1016/j.cois.2024.101225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malinski KH, Sorenson CE, Moore ME et al. Host species differences in the thermal mismatch of host–parasitoid interactions. J Exp Biol. 2023;226. 10.1242/jeb.245702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manthey C, Johnston PR, Nakagawa S et al. Complete metamorphosis and microbiota turnover in insects. Mol Ecol. 2023;32:6543–51. 10.1111/mec.16673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61217. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minard G, Tikhonov G, Ovaskainen O et al. The microbiome of the Melitaea cinxia butterfly shows marked variation but is only little explained by the traits of the butterfly or its host plant. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:4253–69. 10.1111/1462-2920.14786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moghadam NN, Thorshauge PM, Kristensen TN et al. Strong responses of Drosophila melanogaster microbiota to developmental temperature. Fly (Austin). 2018;12:1–12. 10.1080/19336934.2017.1394558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montovan KJ, Couchoux C, Jones LE et al. The puzzle of partial resource use by a parasitoid wasp. Am Nat. 2015;185:538–50. 10.1086/680036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore ME, Hill CA, Kingsolver JG. Differing thermal sensitivities in a host–parasitoid interaction: high, fluctuating developmental temperatures produce dead wasps and giant caterpillars. Funct Ecol. 2021;35:675–85. 10.1111/1365-2435.13748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nair A, Nonaka E, van Nouhuys S. Increased fluctuation in a butterfly metapopulation leads to diploid males and decline of a hyperparasitoid. Proc Biol Sci. 2018;285:20180372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nieminen M, Siljander M, Hanski I. Structure and dynamics of Melitaea cinxia metapopulations. In: Ehrlich PR, Hanski I (eds), On the Wings of Checkerspots: A Model System for Population Biology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004, 63–91. 10.1093/oso/9780195158274.001.0001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ojanen SP, Nieminen M, Meyke E et al. Long-term metapopulation study of the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia): survey methods, data management, and long-term population trends. Ecol Evol. 2013;3:3713–37. 10.1002/ece3.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Opedal ØH, Ovaskainen O, Saastamoinen M et al. Host-plant availability drives the spatiotemporal dynamics of interacting metapopulations across a fragmented landscape. Ecology. 2020;101:e03186. 10.1002/ecy.3186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. CRAN, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B et al. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2584. 10.7717/peerj.2584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rozadilla G, Cabrera NA, Virla EG et al. Gut microbiota of Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) larvae as revealed by metatranscriptomic analysis. J Appl Entomol. 2020;144:351–63. 10.1111/jen.12742. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saastamoinen M, Hirai N, van Nouhuys S. Direct and trans-generational responses to food deprivation during development in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Oecologia. 2013;171:93–104. 10.1007/s00442-012-2412-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saastamoinen M. Life-history, genotypic, and environmental correlates of clutch size in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Ecol Entomol. 2007;32:235–42. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00865.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Salgado AL, DiLeo MF, Saastamoinen M. Narrow oviposition preference of an insect herbivore risks survival under conditions of severe drought. Funct Ecol. 2020;34:1358–69. 10.1111/1365-2435.13587. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sanaei E, Chavez J, Harris EV et al. Microbiome analysis of monarch butterflies reveals effects of development and diet. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024;100. 10.1093/femsec/fiae143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Tójar A, Lagisz M, Moran NP et al. The jury is still out regarding the generality of adaptive “transgenerational” effects. Ecol Lett. 2020;23:1715–8. 10.1111/ele.13479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sepulveda J, Moeller AH. The effects of temperature on animal gut microbiomes. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:384. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serrato-Salas J, Gendrin M. Involvement of microbiota in insect physiology: focus on B vitamins. mBio. 2023;14. 10.1128/mbio.02225-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sevim A, Sevim E. Culturable bacterial communities related to different larval stages of Sanys irrosea (Guenee, 1852) (Lepidoptera: noctuoidae). J Adv Res Nat Appl Sci. 2022;8:641–50. 10.28979/jarnas.1097397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Simhadri RK, Fast EM, Guo R et al. The gut commensal microbiome of Drosophila melanogaster is modified by the endosymbiont Wolbachia. mSphere. 2017;2. 10.1128/mSphere.00287-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sokal M. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kansas Sci Bull. 1958;38:1409–38. [Google Scholar]
- Sprockett D, Fukami T, Relman DA. Role of priority effects in the early-life assembly of the gut microbiota. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15:197–205. 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stillson PT, Baltrus DA, Ravenscraft A. Prevalence of an insect-associated genomic region in environmentally acquired Burkholderiaceae symbionts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022;88:e0250221. 10.1128/aem.02502-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Susi H, Laine A-L. Agricultural land use disrupts biodiversity mediation of virus infections in wild plant populations. New Phytol. 2021;230:2447–58. 10.1111/nph.17156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tack AJM, Mononen T, Hanski I. Increasing frequency of low summer precipitation synchronizes dynamics and compromises metapopulation stability in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282:20150173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tinker KA, Ottesen EA. Differences in gut microbiome composition between sympatric wild and allopatric laboratory populations of omnivorous cockroaches. Front Microbiol. 2021;12. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.703785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toft C, Andersson SGE. Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:465–75. 10.1038/nrg2798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Nouhuys S, Ehrnsten J. Wasp behavior leads to uniform parasitism of a host available only a few hours per year. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:661–5. 10.1093/beheco/arh059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- van Nouhuys S, Hanski I. Natural enemies of checkerspot butterflies. In: Ehrlich PR, Hanski I (eds), On the Wings of Checkerspots: A Model System for Population Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 161–80. 10.1093/oso/9780195158274.001.0001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- van Nouhuys S, Kohonen M, Duplouy A. Wolbachia increases the susceptibility of a parasitoid wasp to hyperparasitism. J Exp Biol. 2016;219:2984–90. 10.1242/jeb.140699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Nouhuys S, Lei G. Parasitoid–host metapopulation dynamics: the causes and consequences of phenological asynchrony. J Anim Ecol. 2004;73:526–35. 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00827.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Verspagen N, Ikonen S, Maes D et al. Thermal plasticity in development and diapause strategy in a temperate butterfly across a latitudinal gradient. Funct Ecol. 2023;37:3111–23. 10.1111/1365-2435.14446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Verspagen N, Ikonen S, Saastamoinen M et al. Multidimensional plasticity in the Glanville fritillary butterfly: larval performance is temperature, host and family specific. Proc Biol Sci. 2020;287:20202577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Gao P, Zheng J et al. Effects of parasitism by a parasitoid wasp on the gut microbiota in a predaceous lady beetle host. Pest Manag Sci. 2023;79:4501–7. 10.1002/ps.7652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Werren JH, Baldo L, Clark ME. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:741–51. 10.1038/nrmicro1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4:1686. 10.21105/joss.01686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wickham H. Ggplot2. New York: Springer, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Wilches DM, Coghlin PC, Floate KD. Next generation sequencing, insect microbiomes, and the confounding effect of Wolbachia: a case study using spotted-wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) (Diptera: drosophilidae). Can J Zool. 2021;99:588–95. 10.1139/cjz-2020-0260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Kobert K, Flouri T et al. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:614–20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequences are available in NCBI through the accession code PRJNA1227207.






