Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Mar 28;17:4567. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70960-9

Nanoscale greenhouse effect for promoting solar-driven CO2 reduction with water to CH4

Xiaofeng Kang 1,#, Mingyu Jiang 1,#, Jiarong Lv 1,#, Chen Liao 1, Xue Ding 1, Feng Wang 1, Shengjie Bai 1, Ya Liu 1,, Liejin Guo 1,
PMCID: PMC13194751  PMID: 41904126

Abstract

Improvement of solar-to-chemical energy conversion in photocatalytic CO2 reduction remains fundamentally constrained by insufficient utilization of solar energy, particularly low-energy photons. Here we report a nanoscale greenhouse structure (Bi@Fe2O3) that enables cascaded utilization of full solar spectrum. The Bi nanocore primarily absorbs low-energy photons, generating localized nanoheating via non-radiative heating through localized surface plasmon resonance effects and energetic hot electrons. Meanwhile, the oxygen-vacancy-rich loose Fe2O3 shell absorbs high-energy photons and serves as the catalytic bed, where injected hot electrons and confined heat synergistically promote CO2 activation and deep hydrogenation. Benefiting from the interplay between photochemical and photothermal effects, the system achieves a CH4 production rate of 273.81 μmol g–1 h–1 with 98.60% selectivity and an apparent quantum efficiency of 0.64% at 850 nm illumination without any external heating or sacrificial agents. This work paves a way for the efficient utilization of the entire solar spectrum.

Subject terms: Photocatalysis, Artificial photosynthesis, Catalyst synthesis


Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction is fundamentally limited by inefficient utilization of solar energy, particularly low-energy photons. Here, the authors report a nanoscale greenhouse structure (Bi@Fe₂O₃) that enables cascaded full-spectrum solar utilization and enhances solar-driven CO₂ reduction with water to CH₄.

Introduction

Photocatalytic CO2 reduction (PCO2R), a pivotal technology that directly converts CO2, H2O, and sunlight into hydrocarbon compounds to store intermittent solar energy, represents a critical pathway toward achieving carbon neutrality and enabling a renewable energy economy13. Consequently, a vast array of semiconductors and metallic nanocatalysts have been studied, demonstrating the feasibility of solar-driven CO2 reduction47. Despite recent progress, the advancement of PCO2R technologies toward technoeconomic applications is still restricted by two key obstacles. One is the low utilization efficiency of solar energy, especially in the low-energy photon region8, and the other is the sluggish kinetics of transferring photogenerated energy into reactant molecules9. Furthermore, the selective synthesis of high-value hydrocarbons remains a formidable challenge, due to complex multi-electron and multi-proton transfer steps during PCO2R10.

As is well known, the solar spectrum is composed of approximately 6.8% ultraviolet (UV), 38.9% visible (vis), and 54.3% near-infrared (NIR) light. However, most photocatalysts commonly developed for PCO2R are only capable of harvesting the solar spectrum in the UV and visible ranges for a long time11. Therefore, developing NIR-responsive photocatalysts is considered essential for achieving broad-spectrum-driven PCO2R. To date, conventional NIR-responsive photocatalysts have mainly relied on some narrow-bandgap semiconductors such as lead12 and mercury chalcogenides13. Their practical application in PCO2R is severely constrained, which is ascribed to high toxicity, poor stability, and the diminished redox capability associated with bandgap narrowing. Recent research has demonstrated that noble metal plasmonic nanoparticles can interact strongly with incident light through localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR)1416. Adjusting the geometric characteristics of these nanostructures, such as their symmetry and size, allows precise modulation of the LSPR absorption peak of these materials across a wide spectral range from UV to NIR1719. This spectral versatility is the cornerstone of their application as broadband light-harvesting antennas, offering immense potential for advanced solar-to-chemical energy conversion systems2024. Moreover, some studies have exhibited that with the assistance of organic additives, specific proton nanostructures can convert CO2 under laser irradiation, indicating their potential in PCO2R25,26. However, in the rapid development of such protonic materials, it has been found that the mismatch in timescales between fast LSPR relaxation (up to approximately 100 ps) and slow chemical reduction kinetics (milliseconds or seconds) severely hinders solar-to-chemical energy conversion2729. To overcome this bottleneck, researchers have hybridized or coupled plasmonic materials with semiconductor nanostructures (referred to as “antenna reactors”3032) to capture hot carriers and accelerate chemical reduction kinetics. Nevertheless, such structures may cause plasmonic nanoparticles to block reaction sites on the semiconductor, resulting in sluggish chemical reduction kinetics and inadequate utilization of solar energy, thereby limiting their enhancement capabilities. Additionally, the surface atoms of plasmonic metals (primarily gold (Au), silver (Ag), and palladium (Pd), among others) exhibit high mobility under incident light, leading to the rapid degradation of such nanostructures33,34.

Inspired by the Earth’s greenhouse effect, we herein realize a nanoscale greenhouse effect for promoting highly selective CO2 reduction to CH4 based on a noble-metal-free Bi@Fe2O3 core@shell structure (Fig. 1). In this design, the Bi nanocore functions as a nanoscale transducer, converting solar energy into two synergistic driving forces: energetic hot electrons and intense localized heat. The loose Fe2O3 shell plays a dual, critical role by acting as a thermal insulator to confine the localized heat while simultaneously accepting the injected hot electrons from the Bi nanocore to serve as a catalytic platform. Thus, effectively activating CO2 and water molecules, enhancing the local electric field, and dramatically accelerating the chemical reaction kinetics. This unique coupling of photochemical and photothermal effects enables remarkable performance for solar-to-chemical energy conversion without any external energy (e.g., thermal, electric) or sacrificial agents,  delivering CH4 production rate of 273.81 μmol g–1 h–1 with 98.60% selectivity, demonstrating a record-high apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of 0.64% at 850 nm NIR light illumination compared with the current reports. Our work provides an insightful pathway for efficiently utilizing the full solar spectrum to drive CO2 reduction with water into hydrocarbons.

Fig. 1. Contrast of this work with previous works.

Fig. 1

Diagram illustrating the integration of intermittent sunlight and residual heat for on-demand CO2 conversion with water.

Results

Synthesis and microstructural analyses

The 5-Bi@Fe2O3 core@shell photocatalyst was obtained via a two-step solvothermal strategy followed by a controlled calcination process under an inert atmosphere. (Supplementary Fig. 1), yielding an intimately coupled metal/oxide heterostructure. As illustrated in Fig. 2a, a metallic Bi nanocrystal (NC) core is conformally encapsulated by a porous Fe2O3 shell, which maximizes interfacial contact while maintaining open diffusion pathways. Schematic illustration of the interfacial electronic contact is exhibited in Fig. 2b. Fermi-level equilibration upon contact establishes band bending and an internal electric field between the Bi core and the Fe2O3 shell, providing a driving force for directional transfer of plasmon-excited electrons from the Bi core to the Fe2O3 shell. According to the results in Fig. 2c, Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) further confirms the coexistence of Fe2O3 (JCPDS No. 87-1164) and metallic Bi (JCPDS No. 85-1329) without discernible impurities. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) directly evidence the morphology of the obtained spherical core@shell structure. The TEM image shows a clear contrast between the dense Bi core and the surrounding Fe2O3 shell (Fig. 2d), in which a sphere Bi NC was surrounded by a loose Fe2O3 shell, with an average size of 101 ± 31 nm (Supplementary Fig. 2). It can also be seen from the SEM images that 5-Bi@Fe2O3 possesses a spherical core@shell nanostructure (Supplementary Fig. 3). The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM, Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 4) images indicated that the main exposed lattice planes of Bi NC in 5-Bi@Fe2O3 were (012) and (104) facets, corresponding to measured fringes of 0.33 nm and 0.24 nm, respectively. The lattice fringe of 0.25 nm was also exhibited, indexed to (110) facets of Fe2O3 in 5-Bi@Fe2O3. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) (inset in Fig. 2e) showed two sets of diffraction patterns, with the (012) or (104) and (110) spots still indexed to Bi and Fe2O3. Moreover, HAADF-STEM with EDX elemental mapping measurements (Fig. 2f) and SEM with EDX elemental mapping measurements of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 (Supplementary Fig. 5) further verify the spatially separated distribution of Bi (core) and Fe/O (shell), corroborating the uniform encapsulation of Bi NCs by the Fe2O3 shell and the formation of a well-defined core@shell junction. Finally, it is worth noting that this sphere core@shell structure exhibited a larger specific surface area (175.5 m2/g) with a uniform mesoporous structure (5.8 nm) (Supplementary Fig. 6 and 7 and Supplementary Table 1), which has the advantage of adsorbing more reactant molecules, exposing a greater number of active sites, and providing convenient channels for mass transport35.

Fig. 2. Morphological and structural characterizations.

Fig. 2

a Schematic illustration of the Bi@Fe2O3 core@shell nanospheres. b Schematic illustration of the heterojunction in Bi@Fe2O3. Wm and Ws represent the work functions of the Bi NC and Fe2O3, respectively. EF,m and EF,s represent Fermi-energy levels of the Bi NC and Fe2O3, respectively; ECBM is the bottom of the conduction band; EVBM is the top of the valence band; Evac is the vacuum-energy level; E represents the built-in electric field. c XRD patterns of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst. d TEM images of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst. e HRTEM image and SAED pattern of the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst. f HAADF-STEM image and corresponding EDS elemental mapping of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst. g, h Normalized X-ray absorption near-edge spectra (XANES) at the Bi L3-edge (g) k2-weighted Fourier transform extended X-ray absorption fine-structure spectra (EXAFS) in r-space (h) for 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst. i Wavelet-transformed k2-weighted EXAFS spectra of the Bi foil and 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst.

To gain deeper insight into the atomic and electronic structure of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 core@shell, synchrotron radiation XAS was further applied to test the Bi L3-edge and Fe K-edge. The Bi L3-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectrum of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 closely resembles that of Bi foil, indicating Bi in 5-Bi@Fe2O3 exists predominantly in the metallic Bi0 state (Fig. 2g), which is consistent with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results (Supplementary Fig. 8a). The results of the Fourier-transformed extended X-ray absorption fine structure (FT-EXAFS) further corroborate this metallic nature by showing two obvious Bi–Bi coordination features (Fig. 2h), and quantitative EXAFS fitting resolves two Bi–Bi shells at 3.07 ± 0.02 Å and 3.50 ± 0.03 Å (Supplementary Table 2). In addition to the dominant Bi–Bi coordination, an extra Bi–O contribution is resolved at 2.16 ± 0.04 Å (Supplementary Table 2), indicating interfacial Bi–O bonding between the metallic Bi core and the Fe2O3 shell. The coexistence of Bi–Bi and Bi–O scattering paths is further supported by wavelet-transform analysis and EXAFS fitting (Fig. 2i and Supplementary Fig. 8b–d). This directly confirmed that 5-Bi@Fe2O3 is a chemically coupled core@shell interface that can shorten the transfer distance and facilitate efficient transport of plasmon-excited carriers from Bi to the Fe2O3 shell.

Furthermore, the Fe K-edge XAS spectra were analyzed to confirm the nature of the shell. The Fe K-edge EXAFS fitting reveals an Fe–O first-shell distance of 2.01 ± 0.03 Å and a higher-shell Fe–Fe contribution at 3.33 ± 0.02 Å (Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 9). This is consistent with a defect-rich Fe2O3 shell framework36, while indicating a locally distorted coordination environment associated with defect formation in the shell. The Fe XANES spectrum and the Fe XPS result of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 also exhibit the same results about the Fe state (Supplementary Fig. 10), which suggests the possible formation of oxygen vacancies (Vo) within the Fe2O3 shell. The presence of oxygen vacancies is further verified by the EPR signal centered at g ≈ 2.003 and O 1 s XPS (Supplementary Fig. 11). Collectively, these characterizations fully demonstrate the core@shell structure of 5-Bi@Fe2O3, featuring a metallic Bi0 core, a VO-enriched Fe2O3 shell, and an interfacial Bi–O linkage, which together provide a robust structure for efficient interfacial charge transfer and defect-mediated CO2 reduction. As a comparison, a series of x-Bi@Fe2O3 was prepared by adjusting the amount of Bi precursor (Supplementary Fig. 12). On the other hand, Bi NCs, pure Fe2O3, and Bi-Fe2O3 were also prepared and characterized in Supplementary Fig. 13.

Light and thermal effects over the unique core@shell structure

After confirming the unique structure, we further explore the fundamental optical properties and solar-to-heat energy conversion ability. Three representative catalysts are shown in Supplementary Fig. 14. As displayed in Fig. 3a, the Fe2O3 catalyst exhibits a strong, broad absorption band below ~600 nm. Bi NCs display strong, broadband absorption covering the UV-vis-NIR region, which is characteristic of bismuth plasmonic and interband transitions. Compared to pure Fe2O3, the Bi-Fe2O3 catalyst and Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst maintain this excellent broadband light-harvesting ability of Bi NCs (300–2000 nm). Moreover, increasing the Bi content effectively enhances the light absorption of x-Bi@Fe2O3, particularly in the NIR region (Supplementary Fig. 15). This enhanced NIR absorption is crucial for the efficient cascaded utilization of the full solar spectrum.

Fig. 3. Full-spectrum light harvesting and nanoscale heat-localization behavior of 5-Bi@Fe2O3.

Fig. 3

a UV-vis-NIR DRS spectra of Bi NCs, Fe2O3, Bi-Fe2O3, and 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalysts. b Dependence of steady-state surface temperature of catalysts on light intensity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of five independent measurements of the same catalyst. c Monitoring of temperatures over different Fe2O3-based catalysts under continuous illumination, using a full-Arc 300 W Xe lamp with an optical density of 455 mW cm–2. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent measurements of the same catalyst. d The infrared thermal images of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst under UV-vis, NIR, vis-NIR, and UV-vis-NIR light under a full-Arc 300 W Xe lamp with an optical density of 455 mW cm–2. e Schematics of heat dissipation for Bi-Fe2O3 catalyst and the nanoscale greenhouse effect for Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst. f Electric field distribution and spatial distribution of temperature rise under different excitation wavelengths that were excited at an incident power density of 2.5 mW μm–2 over Bi@Fe2O3. Scale bars, 50 nm.

The heat generated by the non-radiative relaxation of hot electrons can cause an increase in temperature in the catalyst bed (without any external heating), thereby accelerating the reaction37, especially in gas-solid phase reaction systems without temperature control. Under the reaction conditions of the following photocatalytic performance tests, the equilibrium temperature at the center of the illuminated surface of the catalyst was measured using an embedded contact thermocouple attached to the surface of the photocatalyst (Supplementary Fig. 16a). As the light intensity increased, the surface equilibrium temperature of Fe2O3, Bi-Fe2O3 and 5-Bi@Fe2O3 continued to rise (Fig. 3b). Numerical simulation results also revealed that light power density significantly affects the average temperature of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 (Supplementary Fig. 17). Specifically, after 20 min of illumination, the temperature of the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 reached above 170 °C, higher than that of the blank comparsion (56 °C) (Fig. 3c). Compared to Fe2O3 and Bi-Fe2O3, the temperatures of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 are obviously higher, indicating that the core@shell structure exhibits the best photothermal effect3840. The average temperature of specific regions, which is in the infrared images measured using SmartView software (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 16b), is close to the temperatures measured by thermocouples in Fig. 3c. It is worth noting that the values measured by the thermocouple and infrared thermal imager represent the macroscopic surface temperatures of different catalysts, which are lower than the local temperatures of Bi NCs.

Importantly, compared to Bi-Fe2O3, the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst effectively suppresses heat dissipation from the Bi core to the surrounding environment after illumination (Fig. 3e). COMSOL Multiphysics simulations further reveal obvious enhancement of local electric fields and surface thermal energy in 5-Bi@Fe2O3 under NIR excitation, accompanied by a temperature increase of ~135 K (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Figs. 1820). Additionally, to decouple thermal confinement from electronic effects, a Bi@SiO2 core@shell structure with an optically transparent and electronically insulating shell was synthesized as a control (Supplementary Fig. 21). Although Bi@SiO2 exhibits a certain photothermal temperature rise due to suppressed heat dissipation (Supplementary Fig. 22), its heating efficiency remains lower than that of Bi@Fe2O3 under identical illumination conditions (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 22b and Fig. 3c). These results indicate that the elevated temperature of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 originates not only from thermal insulation by the shell, but also from enhanced broadband light absorption and interfacial energy conversion enabled by the Fe2O3 shell. Based on simulation and experimental results, the observed temperature increase is more likely attributed to the enhanced broadband absorption of the Bi core after core@shell structure construction, as well as the intrinsically low thermal conductivity of the Fe2O3 shell layer. The resulting localized high-temperature environment promotes molecular collision frequency and reaction kinetics, thereby enhancing the solar-to-chemical energy conversion efficiency41,42.

PCO2R driven by coupling photo-/photothermal effect

This unique structure design, composed of Bi spheres and a loose Fe2O3 shell, aims to offer sufficient reaction driving force and to provide a channel for the mass transfer of reactants and products. To reveal the advantages of the unique structure design, PCO2R performance was tested under full-Arc Xe lamp irradiation for all photocatalysts (Supplementary Fig. 23). Detailed experimental procedures for PCO2R are shown in the Supporting Information. By optimizing the volume of H2O and the partial pressure of CO2 (Supplementary Fig. 24, with the entire system operating at atmospheric pressure), PCO2R was performed under full-spectrum illumination at different light intensities without any external heating or any sacrificial agent or photosensitizer. Firstly, to distinguish the individual contributions of the core and the shell of unique structure in photocatalytic CO2 to CH4, a series of control experiments were performed under light power 50–455 mW cm–2 for pure Fe2O3 and Bi NCs. At different light powers, nearly no products can be detected for pure Bi NCs, clearly indicating that Bi NCs itself is not active for PCO2R (Supplementary Fig. 25). While pure Fe2O3 produces only a small amount of products and intermediates, which may be associated with defect-derived surface states rather than intrinsic band-edge reduction (Supplementary Figs. 26 and 27). Interestingly, after introducing Bi nanoparticles, CH4 becomes the dominant product instead of CO (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 28), which may be attributed to an additional driving force from Bi nanoparticles to break the thermodynamic barrier for CO2 to hydrocarbons. More importantly, constructing the Bi@Fe2O3 core@shell structure further markedly increases the CH4 selectivity (Fig. 4a and  Fig. 29). Moreover, by investigating the effect of light intensity on the catalytic activity, it is found that the catalytic activity of the Bi-Fe2O3 increases with increasing light power, reaching a maximum (20.69 μmol g–1 h–1) at a critical value of 455 mW cm–2 (Fig. 4b). In sharp contrast, the spherical 5-Bi@Fe2O3 exhibits much higher CH4 production rate at each light power compared to Bi-Fe2O3, the maximum value of 273.81 μmol g–1 h–1 with a selectivity 98.60% at 455 mW cm–2 (Fig. 4c). Besides these gaseous products (CO, CH4), only trace amounts of H2 (0.27 ~ 0.58 μmol g–1 h–1) were detected over these photocatalysts, indicating that the competing hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) was effectively suppressed43.

Fig. 4. Photo-/photothermo-synergistic catalysis of PCO2R.

Fig. 4

a The PCO2R performance over different catalysts at 455 mW cm–2. Error bars in the figure represent standard deviations obtained from three independent measurements, which also include other figures about the performance measurements in this work. b Dependence of the PCO2R performance on light intensity over Bi-Fe2O3 catalyst. c Dependence of the PCO2R performance on light intensity over 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst. d The long-term stability test over 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst at 455 mW cm–2 without external heating. e The comparison of the PCO2R performance in this work with the previous works (see Supplementary Table 7), which directly convert CO2, H2O, and sunlight into compounds. f Average CH4 production rates over 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst under different conditions at 455 mW cm–2. g CH4 production rate of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst as a function of time under irradiation by full-Arc 300 W Xe lamp with different filters at 455 mW cm–2. h CH4 production rate of the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst at various temperatures and under 520 nm light irradiation with various intensities.

Verifying the origin of the products is another critical step for PCO2R. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 30 and Supplementary Table 4, the presence of the catalyst, light, CO2, and H2O is indispensable for the PCO2R over 5-Bi@Fe2O3. To further corroborate the carbon source, we performed isotopic labeling experiments using 13CO2 as the feedstock. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 31a, when 12CO2 and 13CO2 were used as the respective feed gases, mass signals at m/z = 28 and 29 were assigned to 12CO and 13CO, respectively. Similarly, signals at m/z = 16 and 17 were attributed to 12CH4 and 13CH4. These results confirm that the reduced carbon products were only generated by PCO2R rather than other reactions. Furthermore, previous studies indicated that the reduced carbon products were difficult to generate in the photocatalytic system without adding water44, thus the water was indispensable in the PCO2R. Therefore, an H218O isotope-labeling experiment was performed to investigate whether water participates in the overall reaction (Supplementary Fig. 32a). Although there might be oxygen atom exchange between CO2 and H2O, the production of 18O2 implied the involvement of water in the whole PCO2R process. Moreover, quantitative analysis of the evolved gases revealed the concurrent formation of O2 throughout the CO2 reduction process (Supplementary Fig. 32b, c), with no detectable by-products such as H2O2. This confirms that the photocatalytic conversion between CO2 and H2O proceeds through a complete and closed redox cycle. Moreover, deuterium oxide (D2O) was employed in the reaction to trace the origin of the H element in the produced CH4. The product peak at m/z = 18 was indexed to CD4 (Supplementary Fig. 31b) when using D2O in the reaction, indicating that the proton in CH4 comes from H2O. This result further manifests that the formation of CH4 is a multistep hydrogenation process and that the proton is provided by H2O4547.

To explore the high stability of the core@shell structure with the proposed design, a comprehensive characterization was performed. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results demonstrate that the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst exhibits excellent high-temperature tolerance (Supplementary Fig. 33). More importantly, the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst nearly retained its original morphology rather than collapsing after PCO2R reaction (Supplementary Fig. 34a, b). The XRD patterns of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 after PCO2R reaction exhibited no discernible changes (Supplementary Fig. 34c), confirming the strong thermal stability of the catalyst structure. Furthermore, according to the XPS and XAS spectra of the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst after PCO2R reaction (Supplementary Figs. 35 and 36; and Supplementary Tables 5 and 6), the valence state and coordination environment of Bi and Fe in the core@shell catalyst did not clearly change, indicating that the Bi core does not undergo oxidation during the reaction, and the Fe-VO active sites keep stable in the reaction process (Supplementary Fig. 37). Concurrently, 21-h consecutive testing and another 11-h consecutive testing for 5-Bi@Fe2O3 were carried out (Fig. 4d). Between the two tests, the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 was kept in Ar gas at room temperature for 45 days. During the first 21-h test, there is almost no significant degradation of PCO2R activity. Surprisingly, the next 11-h test still exhibits stable selectivity in spite of the slightly fluctuating yield of CH4. These results clearly confirm that the outer Fe2O3 shell effectively protects the encapsulated Bi nanoparticles from thermal sintering at elevated temperatures48. The core@shell design not only provides a super-photothermal effect through the thermal insulation and the electronic-structure modulation of the nanoporous shell, but also enhances the thermal stability of the Bi nanoparticles against sintering due to spatial confinement within the Fe2O3 sheath. This enhanced photothermal effect and thermal stability are expected to synergistically improve the photothermal catalytic CO2 activity. We compared the performance in this work to typical reports of PCO2R without an external heater. Impressively, to the best of our knowledge, this represents a record-high performance for noble-metal-free photocatalysts in the reduction of CO2 with water to CH4, substantially surpassing most previously reported systems (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Table 7). And the AQE at 850 nm is promoted to 0.64% (Supplementary Fig. 38). Such a superior photoconversion efficiency under low-energy NIR light illumination, which is even comparable with the efficiencies of the representative works in PCO2R with high-energy photons, achieves the record-high AQE of PCO2R under NIR light illumination (Supplementary Table 8).

To distinguish the respective contributions of light and heat, the PCO2R over the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst was conducted under four distinct conditions: (i) in the dark at room temperature; (ii) under 300 W Xe lamp illumination with a broadband pass filter (λ < 800 nm) to exclude infrared light; (iii) under full-spectrum irradiation from the 300 W Xe lamp; and (iv) in the dark at 220 °C. As shown in Fig. 4f, PCO2R cannot occur in the dark at either room temperature or at an elevated temperature of 220 °C, which unambiguously confirms that the PCO2R over 5-Bi@Fe2O3 is exclusively light-driven. Under full-spectrum irradiation from the 300 W Xe lamp, the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst exhibited a remarkable average CH4 production rate of 273.81 μmol g–1 h–1 over a 60-min reaction period, during which the catalyst surface temperature reached approximately 212 °C. This rate is 2.7 times higher than that achieved under purely photocatalytic conditions (i.e., with IR light excluded, λ < 800 nm), where the surface temperature only reached ~73 °C. These results powerfully demonstrate a synergistic enhancement between photocatalysis and photothermal catalysis, leading to a superior solar energy utilization efficiency.

Further investigation into the wavelength-dependent activity revealed the distinct roles of different spectral regions. The relative spectral distribution for this series of tests, labeled I through IV, was shown in Supplementary Fig. 39 for (I) no filter (UV-vis-NIR), (II) l > 420 nm (vis-NIR), (III) l > 800 nm (NIR), and (IV) l < 800 nm (UV-vis). The temperature variations under different spectral regions were visualized using an infrared (IR) camera (Fig. 3d). As exhibited in Fig. 4g, both visible and NIR light can independently drive the reaction, while filtering out either the NIR portion (λ < 800 nm) or the UV-vis portion (λ > 800 nm) leads to a dramatic drop of the activity. The UV-vis photons are primarily responsible for initiating the photochemical pathway via bandgap excitation in the Fe2O3 shell. Meanwhile, the NIR photons are selectively harvested by the Bi core to generate energetic hot electrons and a strong photothermal effect. This coupling of a semiconductor component, confirmed as indispensable by control experiments with Bi NCs, and a plasmonic nanoheater is the key to the catalyst’s exceptional performance in utilizing low-energy photons. To further reveal the influence of thermal effect, temperature-dependent photocatalytic tests were conducted by systematically varying the reaction temperature under 520 nm illumination while tuning the light intensity. As shown in Fig. 4h, under the same light intensity, the catalytic performance of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 exhibited a clear correlation with the reaction temperature, indicating that light-induced heat can promote the PCO2R process. Furthermore, a similar positive correlation between performance and reaction temperature was observed across various light intensities, indicating that at a constant reaction temperature, increasing the light intensity enhances the catalytic activity. This finding aligns with the observed temperature varying trends (Fig. 3b) and catalytic performance changes (Fig. 4a, b) as a function of light intensity.

Charge carrier dynamics

To elucidate the charge carrier dynamics over 5-Bi@Fe2O3 for the PCO2R process, femtosecond transient absorption (fs-TA) spectroscopy was performed under dual excitation at 560 nm and 870 nm. Under 560 nm excitation, pristine Fe2O3 exhibits a broad photoinduced absorption (PIA) in the 500–800 nm region (Fig. 5a)49, which is attributed to the absorption of trapped photogenerated charge carriers. In contrast, 5-Bi@Fe2O3 displays a modified transient spectral profile with a weakened PIA at short wavelengths and a notable ground-state bleach (GSB) around ~700 nm (Fig. 5b), consistent with interfacial electronic coupling between the Bi core and Fe2O3 shell. Upon 870 nm excitation, a distinct plasmon-induced bleach in the NIR region (800–1000 nm) is observed for 5-Bi@Fe2O3 (Fig. 5c), whereas negligible signals are detected for pristine Fe2O3, confirming that the NIR response originates exclusively from the LSPR of Bi nanospheres. Kinetic fitting analysis further reveals that the carrier lifetimes of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 are markedly longer than pristine Fe2O3 (Supplementary Fig. 40), particularly under NIR illumination. This lifetime extension indicates suppressed electron-hole recombination enabled by ultrafast interfacial charge separation at the Bi/Fe2O3 interface, which stabilizes plasmon-generated hot electrons and promotes their participation in subsequent surface reactions.

Fig. 5. Charge carrier dynamics.

Fig. 5

2D pseudo-color plot for a pristine Fe2O3 pumped at 560 nm, b 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst pumped at 560 nm, and c 870 nm, respectively. KPFM images of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst d in the dark, e under UV-vis, and f under UV-vis-NIR illumination. g Corresponding to the surface potential analysis of the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst. Schematic illustration of the charge transfer processes of the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst during PCO2R under h UV-vis and i UV-vis-NIR excitation conditions. kET represents the rate constant for hot-electron injection from Bi core to the interfacial accumulation layer; kHT1 denotes the hole transfer rates of hole-trapping processes between Bi core and Fe2O3 shell; kHT2 represents the rate constant of the corresponding holes from the Fe2O3 are consumed mainly for water oxidation; k(e-h)1 and k(e-h)2 correspond to the electron-hole recombination rate constant in Bi core and Fe2O3 shell, respectively; kCO2R represents CO2 reduction reaction rate constant.

To further visualize the interfacial charge redistribution, light-assisted Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) was employed to investigate the surface potential distribution of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 (Supplementary Fig. 41). As shown in Fig. 5d–g, the surface potential (CPD) of both the Bi core and Fe2O3 shell under UV-vis-NIR irradiation exhibits a significant positive shift compared to that under dark or UV-vis illumination, indicating enhanced electron accumulation under full-spectrum excitation. This enhanced CPD response is attributed to the additional absorption of NIR photons, which activates the LSPR of Bi and generates a larger population of energetic hot electrons. Additionally, the transient photocurrent of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 under full-spectrum illumination was markedly higher than that under UV-vis irradiation (Supplementary Fig. 42). These results demonstrate that UV-vis and NIR light synergistically enhance charge separation and carrier transport in 5-Bi@Fe2O3, thereby providing an optimal electronic environment for plasmon-assisted CO2 reduction.

Based on the above complementary spectroscopic analysis results, a simplified PCO2R model based on the cascaded utilization of full-solar spectrum-driven over the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 core@shell catalyst is depicted in Fig. 5h, i. Due to the favorable work function alignment (Supplementary Figs. 43 and 44), photoexcited electrons in the Bi core tend to transfer toward the Bi/Fe2O3 junction and accumulate in an interfacial electron-rich region. PCO2R preferentially occurs on the interfacial electron-accumulation layer associated with Fe-VO active sites. Specifically, under UV-vis illumination (Fig. 5h), the electrons generated from Bi interband excitation are transferred to the interfacial accumulation layer (rate constant kET)50, which is corroborated by theoretical computation electron redistribution and electrostatic potential (Supplementary Fig. 45). These energetic hot electrons drive CO2 reduction toward CO/CH4 (rate constant kCO2R), which competes with the electron-hole recombination (rate constant k(e-h)1) of Bi NC and in the Fe2O3 region (rate constant k(e-h)2). The corresponding holes from the Fe2O3 are consumed mainly through water oxidation (rate constant kHT2) or hole-trapping processes (maintaining charge balance, rate constant kHT1). Under UV-vis-NIR illumination (Fig. 5i), the Bi LSPR effect triggers more energetic hot electrons (ET). These hot electrons are efficiently injected and strongly trapped with reactant molecules in the interfacial accumulation layer, creating a significantly higher electron density than under UV-vis illumination. And the large localized electric field in 5-Bi@Fe2O3 promotes charge separation and transfer, thereby enhancing the reduction potential at the reaction interface. Moreover, the prolonged lifetime of photogenerated electrons under NIR excitation enables efficient utilization of the full solar spectrum, while concurrently creating a “self-heating greenhouse bed” effect at the nanoscale (Fig. 3e). This synergistic photothermal enhancement is particularly critical for overcoming the high kinetic barriers associated with multielectron CO2 activation and multielectron-proton CH4 production. Therefore, the CH4 yield under full-spectrum irradiation is significantly higher than that obtained under UV-vis or NIR light alone, which is consistent with the PCO2R performance (Fig. 4g).

Proposed reaction mechanism for enhanced photoactivity

After elucidating the charge carrier dynamics mechanism in this unique core@shell structure, it is necessary to explore deep insight into the origins of the enhanced activity of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 in PCO2R with the support of in situ experimental results and theoretical calculations. As widely reported, oxygen vacancies often serve as the primary active sites for CO2 adsorption and activation51. Generally, the generated oxygen vacancies can act as reactive centers that modulate the local charge density distribution, thereby increasing the number of adsorbed and activated CO2 molecules and lowering the energy barrier for the CO2 reduction reaction. Firstly, to validate this enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity, CO2 adsorption isotherms and temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments were performed. CO2 adsorption isotherms demonstrated that the adsorption capacity of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 is stronger than that of Bi NCs, Fe2O3, and Bi-Fe2O3 (Supplementary Fig. 46a), which is likely due to the defect-enriched shell chemistry and the porous curved shell microenvironment. This result indicates that 5-Bi@Fe2O3 may provide more active sites for adsorbing and converting CO2 molecules during the PCO2R process, thus facilitating the occurrence of the reaction. As the shell composition was optimized, the overall CO2 adsorption capacity increased significantly, consistent with the independent CO2 adsorption results (Supplementary Fig. 46b). Notably, the similarity in CO2 adsorption isotherms among the core@shell samples with different core loadings suggests that CO2 activation on the interfacial sites is sufficiently efficient and does not constitute the rate-determining step in the catalytic reaction. The CO2 adsorption properties of the various catalysts were further evaluated by CO2-TPD, as shown in Fig. 6a. The desorption profiles can be broadly divided into three temperature regions, namely 50 °C–300 °C, 300 °C–450 °C, and above 450 °C, which are generally associated with weak, moderate, and strong CO2 adsorption sites, respectively. Compared with the Fe2O3 and Bi-Fe2O3 catalysts, the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst showed markedly enhanced CO2 adsorption after the construction of the spherical core@shell structure and active component incorporation. In particular, the appearance of obvious medium- and high-temperature desorption features indicates the generation of stronger CO2 binding sites (a broad peak at 300 °C–450 °C and a sharp peak at >450 °C). Strong CO2 adsorption led to a high CO2 conversion rate (Fig. 4a). These sites are mainly attributed to the abundant interfacial regions formed at the core@shell junction, which effectively promote CO2 adsorption and activation. These results powerfully underscore the critical importance of a CO2-activating support (Fe-VO active centers) for promoting efficient PCO2R. CO is a key reaction intermediate during CO2 conversion. As shown in Fig. 6b, the evolution of CO adsorption on the spherical core@shell catalysts closely followed the trend observed for CO2 adsorption, indicating that the construction of the core@shell structure effectively increased both the number and strength of CO adsorption sites. These enhanced CO-binding sites, mainly originating from the abundant core@shell interfacial regions (Fe-VO active centers), stabilized the *CO intermediates and favored their subsequent hydrogenation or dissociation rather than desorption. Consequently, CO selectivity was suppressed, while CH4 formation was significantly promoted. To gain deeper insight into the protonation behavior of *CO, the projected crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis was also performed. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 47, the spherical 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst exhibits a markedly more positive integrated COHP (-ICOHP) value than the Fe2O3 catalyst (3.92 eV vs 0.07 eV), indicating a stronger interfacial electronic coupling between the core@shell junction and the *CO intermediate. This strengthened bond interaction arises from the unique core@shell interface and effectively stabilizes *CO, thereby facilitating its subsequent protonation and promoting the downstream hydrogenation reaction.

Fig. 6. Mechanism analysis of photoactivity enhancement.

Fig. 6

a CO2-TPD profile of different catalysts. b CO-TPD profiles of different catalysts. c In-situ XPS analysis of the Fe 2p signals in 5-Bi@Fe2O3 under full-spectrum light irradiation. d In-situ DRIFTS of Bi-Fe2O3 catalyst. e In-situ DRIFTS of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst. f Gibbs Free energy diagram for PCO2R over the pristine Fe2O3 surface and the Bi/Fe2O3 interfacial model, both with adsorbed CO2 and an explicit H2O solvent layer. (Blue: Bi; Orange: Fe; Red: O; White: H; Gray: C). g Mechanism of PCO2R driven by the synergy of photochemical and photothermal effects based on the cascaded utilization of full-solar spectrum.

Combined with charge carrier dynamics in the above section, to further confirm the proposed mechanism, in situ near-ambient pressure XPS (NAP-XPS) was conducted to deeply explore the specific reconstruction mechanism of the Fe-VO active centers at the reaction interface. As shown in Fig. 6c, the Fe 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 peaks of the Fe2O3-based catalysts shifted toward lower binding energies under light irradiation, accompanied by an obvious increase in the surface Fe2+ concentration compared to the dark condition. This observation indicates that hot electrons generated in the Bi core were efficiently transferred to the interface between the Fe2O3 shell and the Bi core. Notably, the 5-Bi@Fe2O3 sample exhibited a substantially higher Fe2+/Fe3+ proportion than the Bi-Fe2O3 catalyst (Supplementary Table 9), confirming that plasmon-induced hot-electron transfer from Bi nanoparticles promoted the formation of abundant Fe-VO active centers. These sites provided higher electron density for CO2 adsorption and activation (Supplementary Figs. 48), thereby accelerating the superior catalytic activity observed (Fig. 4c). The In-situ EPR measurements further supported this conclusion (Supplementary Fig. 49). The VO-associated signal increased slightly as photoexcited electrons were trapped, and a characteristic peak at g = 2.003 appeared under illumination, demonstrating the presence of excited electrons. In contrast, the EPR spectra of Bi-Fe2O3 before and after Xe lamp irradiation were nearly identical, suggesting less efficient photoinduced electron migration. These results highlight the pivotal role of Fe-VO centers in PCO2R by simultaneously enhancing the intrinsic reactivity of electron-deficient Fe sites and promoting charge separation and transfer. Moreover, under light irradiation, the Bi 4 f peaks exhibited an evident positive shift (Supplementary Fig. 50). Combined with the Fe XPS results, this demonstrates that hot electrons in the Bi core are injected into the Fe2O3 shell during PCO2R.

Subsequently, in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) measurements were employed to fundamentally study the reaction intermediates involved in PCO2R. The infrared signals of intermediates for photoreduction CO2 over 5-Bi@Fe2O3 after illumination demonstrated more abundant characteristic fingerprints compared to pure Fe2O3 and Bi-Fe2O3 (Fig. 6d, e and Supplementary Figs. 27 and 51), which is well in line with its higher performance and selectivity toward photoreduction CO2 (Fig. 4a). After introducing CO2, a peak at 1378 cm−1 appeared, which could be attributed to the monodentate carbonate ion (m-CO32−)52. The asymmetric stretching vibration peaks of *HCO3 were observed at 1318 cm−1. Multiple new peaks appeared after illumination. The peak at 1269 cm−1 can be attributed to the stretching vibration of CO2. The infrared signals at 1590 cm−1 and 1719 cm−1 can be attributed to the *COOH group, which is a critical intermediate in the conversion of CO2 to other solar fuels53,54. The increase in the peak intensity of the absorption band at 2082 cm−1 and 2134 cm−1 confirmed the formation of *CO intermediates in the reaction. Importantly, the absorption bands at 1011, 1473, and 1112 cm−1 correspond to the *CHO, *CH2O, and *CH3O species, respectively, which are key intermediates in CH4 formation. Furthermore, the peak at 3026 cm−1 is attributed to *CH3 stretching vibrations, clearly indicating CH4 formation.

The density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to elucidate the thermodynamic origins of the enhanced activity and selectivity in the PCO2R to CH4 over 5-Bi@Fe2O3. To explicitly probe the interfacial electronic effect and solvent participation, the simplified slab models with explicit water molecules were constructed (details in Methods; optimized structures of pure Fe2O3 and 5-Bi@Fe2O3 in Supplementary Figs. 52−54). The calculated Gibbs free-energy for CO2 reduction with H2O toward CH4 reveals a markedly more favorable thermodynamic advantage over 5-Bi@Fe2O3 than over Fe2O3 (Fig. 6f and Supplementary Figs. 55 and 56). Specifically, CO2 was adsorbed on the surface of 5-Bi@Fe2O3 and Fe2O3 to produce *CO2, and then *CO2 was hydrogenated to produce *COOH. Owing to the high energy barrier, the first proton-coupled electron transfer for *COOH generation was considered a rate-limiting step. Importantly, the formation energy of *COOH on 5-Bi@Fe2O3 is 0.67 eV, distinctly lower than that on pristine Fe2O3 (0.85 eV), indicating that the electron-rich Bi/Fe2O3 interface significantly decreases the energy barrier for CO2 activation. After that, *COOH was then protonated and dehydrated to form a stable intermediate *CO, which was associated with the C − O bond breakage through a proton-assisted electron transfer process50. After *CO formation, pristine Fe2O3 tends to favor CO desorption rather than further hydrogenation (0.20 eV vs 0.98 eV). In contrast, the *CO intermediate is more strongly stabilized for 5-Bi@Fe2O3, and the subsequent hydrogenation to *CHO becomes thermodynamically preferred over CO desorption, thereby resulting in the pathway toward deep hydrogenation. The subsequent hydrogenation steps (*CHO → *CH2O → *CH3O → *+CH4 ↑ ) proceed with overall downhill energetics and a small thermodynamic barrier, consistent with the enhanced CH4 selectivity. Notably, these theoretical trends are in good agreement with the experimental results. Specifically, the increased Fe2+/Fe3+ proportion under irradiation suggests an electron-enriched, defect-associated surface environment, while time-resolved DRIFTS shows the continuous accumulation of *CHO/*COOH-related bands on 5-Bi@Fe2O3. This is consistent with the predicted stabilization of key hydrogenation intermediates and the suppression of premature CO desorption. Therefore, the combined DFT and experiment analyses provide a clear logical framework for highly selective CH4 formation on the Bi@Fe2O3 core@shell catalyst.

Based on these results, we therefore propose a CO2-to-CH4 mechanism driven by the synergistic interplay between photochemical effect and photothermal effect over the Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst (Fig. 6g). Specifically, the Bi core absorbs vis-NIR light to excite LSPR hot electrons, while the Fe2O3 shell absorbs UV-visible light to generate electron-hole pairs. The non-radiative relaxation of these excited electrons generates localized heat, elevating the temperature at the interface between the Bi core and Fe2O3 shell. The Fe2O3 shell, possessing intrinsically low thermal conductivity, effectively confines this energy to establish a highly localized photothermal environment. Crucially, the hot electrons injected from Bi are continuously trapped by Fe-VO sites (Fe3+ to form transient Fe2+ species), which serve as highly active centers for CO2 activation. These Fe-VO sites are not only the platform of the initial activation for CO2 to the *COOH intermediate but also support the subsequent proton-coupled electron transfer deep reduction steps (*COOH → *CO → *CHO → *CH2O → *CH3O → *CH4). Under continuous illumination, plasmon-induced hot-electron injection and localized photothermal heating sustain a dynamic Fe3+/Fe2+ redox cycle, ensuring the persistent availability of Fe-VO sites during multi-electron proton-coupled transfer steps toward CH4 formation. Consequently, the synergistic coupling of plasmonic nanoheating and hot-electron injection based on the Bi@Fe2O3 structure not only accelerates charge-carrier dynamics but also promotes the deep reduction of CO2 and H2O to CH4, as confirmed by in situ spectroscopy and control experiments.

Discussion

In this work, we designed a noble-metal-free core@shell structure (Bi@Fe2O3), which enables cascaded utilization of the full solar spectrum. The metallic Bi core acts as a plasmonic transducer: interband excitation under UV-vis light and LSPR excitation under vis-NIR light generate energetic electrons together with localized nanoheating. Meanwhile, the Fe2O3 shell provides abundant adsorption/activation sites and thermally confines heat to create a “nanoscale greenhouse” microenvironment. This interplay promotes ultrafast hot-electron injection from the Bi core to the Fe2O3 shell, leading to long-lived charge separation and electron accumulation at defect-associated interfacial sites (Fe-VO sites), which serve as highly active centers for CO2 activation and deep hydrogenation toward CH4 formation requiring multielectron-proton coupling steps. Supported by in situ spectroscopy and temperature-dependent analyses, these findings validate the proposed nanoscale greenhouse effect mechanism, and reveal how interfacial charge transfer (photochemical effect) and plasmon-induced nanoheating (photothermal effect) synergistically drive the highly selective production of CH4 from CO2 and H2O. This work offers an effective strategy for solar-to-fuel conversion based on full-spectrum utilization, and provides design insights for future artificial photosynthesis systems.

Methods

Materials and synthesis

Chemicals

All chemicals are of analytical grade and used without further purification. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP, molecular weight of 360,000) was purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China); sodium borohydride (NaBH4), ethanol, bismuth nitrate pentahydrate (Bi(NO3)3·5H2O) and ferric nitrate nonahydrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The deionized water was supplied by a Millipore system (Outlet water resistivity > 18 MΩ cm at 25 °C) in all experiments.

Preparation of Bi@Fe2O3 spherical nanostructures

In a typical procedure, 10 mmol of urea was dissolved in ethylene glycol (EG) under continuous Ar purging. Subsequently, 0.5 mmol of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O was added under stirring for 2 h, obtaining solution A. Additionally, 1 mmol of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O was dispersed in 100 mL EG in a three-necked flask equipped with a reflux condenser, thermometer, and gas inlet/outlet. An appropriate amount of PVP was then added. The mixture was ultrasonicated for 30 min and then vigorously stirred for 1 h. Ar was continuously bubbled through the system for an additional 1 h. The reaction mixture was heated to 150 °C and maintained for 4 h under an Ar atmosphere. After cooling to 70 °C, the resulting solution was marked as solution B. Subsequently, solution A was added dropwise into solution B under an Ar atmosphere. After addition, the reaction was maintained at 150 °C for 8 h under continuous stirring and Ar flow. Then, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and allowed to stand for several hours. The obtained mixture was washed sequentially with ethanol and deionized water, followed by vacuum drying at 60 °C for 12 h. The dried powder was then transferred into a tubular furnace and annealed at 250 °C for 4 h under an Ar atmosphere with a ramping rate of 1 °C/min. The final product, Bi@Fe2O3, featuring a core@shell architecture, was obtained. By varying the amount of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O precursor, a series of samples with different Bi (1-Bi@Fe2O3, 3-Bi@Fe2O3, 5-Bi@Fe2O3, 6-Bi@Fe2O3, and 7-Bi@Fe2O3) were synthesized accordingly.

Preparation of Fe2O3 catalyst

A pristine Fe2O3 sample was synthesized under identical conditions but without adding the Bi precursor. All products were stored in a desiccator before further characterization and catalytic evaluation.

Preparation of Bi-Fe2O3 flat nanostructures

Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (2 mmol) and urea (6 mmol) were dissolved in 40 mL of deionized water and subsequently treated hydrothermally at 120 °C for 2 h, obtaining FeOOH precursor. The precursor mixture was washed, dried, and calcined at 350 °C in air for 2 h to obtain crystalline Fe2O3. Then, 100 mg Fe2O3 was dispersed in 50 mL EG with PVP under ultrasonication. After N2 purging (30 min), Bi(NO3)3·5H2O (0.5 mmol, dissolved in 5 mL EG) was added, followed by dropwise addition of NaBH4 (0.1 M, 10 mL) at 80 °C. After being stirred for 2 h, the mixture was washed alternately with ethanol and water, then vacuum-dried at 60 °C. Finally, the dried mixture was annealed at 250 °C for 1 h under flowing Ar with a ramping rate of 2.5 °C/min to stabilize the Bi nanoparticles.

Fundamental characterizations

The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) spectra were acquired on a PANalytical X’pert MPD Pro diffractometer with Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.1538 nm, 40 kV × 40 mA). The microcrystalline structure and surface characteristics were examined by a JEOL JSM-7800F field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) and an FEI Tecnai G2 F30 S-Twin transmission microscope (TEM). The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis was performed using the installed energy-dispersive X-ray detector, OXFORD MAX-80. SEM and EDS images were recorded on the XL-30 ESEM-FEG SEM. XPS measurements were conducted using a Kratos spectrometer (Axis Ultra DLD) with monochromatic Al Kα radiation (hν = 1486.69 eV). The in situ XPS was recorded using United States-Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC ESCALAB 250Xi. The X-ray source was an aluminum target (Al Kα line energy of 1486.69 eV after monochromator filtration), and the detection pressure was 2 × 10−8 Pa. The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum (DRS) was acquired using a Hitachi double-beam UV4100 UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere in which BaSO4 acted as the background. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were performed on a Bruker A300 spectrometer.

Ultrafast spectroscopy characterization

Femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy was carried out using a PHAROS PH2 Femtosecond laser system. The excitation source was a PHAROS PH2 Femtosecond laser system (LIGHT CONVERSION, Lithuania, 35 fs pulse width, 1 kHz repetition rate, 3 mJ per pulse). The output beam was divided into two paths to feed a pair of optical parametric amplifiers (TOPAS-PRIME) for generating the pump and probe pulses. A white light continuum (350–950 nm) was produced by focusing the 1300 nm signal from one OPA (TOPAS1) onto a sapphire plate, then filtered with a short-pass filter to limit the spectral window. The pump pulses at 560 and 870 nm were generated from the second OPA (TOPAS2), with fluences adjusted to 5.0 mJ cm–2 and 0.7 mJ cm–2, respectively. Temporal resolution was achieved by introducing a delay line into the pump beam path, allowing the capture of differential transmission spectra over time. To correct for spectral dispersion in the white light probe, the optical Kerr effect of the substrate was measured following a standard polarization-resolved method. This involved setting the pump polarization at 45° relative to the probe and analyzing the probe polarization changes after transmission through the sample. These polarization shifts reflected pump-induced anisotropy in the substrate’s refractive index. For nanosecond-scale measurements in the NIR, a separate nanosecond TAS system was employed. Here, excitation was provided by 560 and 870 nm pulses from a Nd:YAG laser, while probe light came from a tungsten–halogen lamp. Transient NIR absorption spectra were recorded using a liquid nitrogen-cooled InSb detector, operating in single-channel mode with spectral scanning via a grating. Decay kinetics at each wavelength were captured using a Ni-Scope digital oscilloscope (8-bit, 100 MHz bandwidth, 30,000 data points).

Kelvin probe force microscopy measurements

The atomic force microscope (AFM) and Kelvin probe force microscope (KPFM) signals were detected by an SPM-9700HT (SHIMADZU, Japan) AFM instrument. The powder sample was dispersed in ethanol and then dropped on a Silicon chip. Au was used for the potentiometric calibration. CPD changes under dark and illumination were recorded to explore photoinduced charge dynamics. According to the following Eq. (1), the CPD can be calculated as:

VCPD=ϕsampleϕtipe 1

where ϕsample is the work function of the sample, ϕtip is the work function of the AFM tip, and e is the elementary charge.

In-situ DRIFTS characterization

In situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) measurement was performed on a Thermo Fisher Nicolet iS50 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a mercury-cadmium-telluride (MCT) detector cooled by liquid nitrogen and a DRIFTS accessory. Each spectrum was collected over the range of 4000 to 600 cm−1 at a resolution of 0.964 cm−1. The as-prepared samples were compressed at the bottom of an in situ sample cell and then degassed for 1 h under an Ar atmosphere at 120 °C to remove the absorbed species before the photocatalytic experiments. After cooling down to room temperature, humidified CO2 (CO2/H2O = 4/1) was flowed into the specimen chamber to saturate the surface absorption of the catalyst. The DRIFTS spectra were collected after a certain irradiation duration. The simulated light source (UV-vis and UV-vis-NIR) was consistent with that in the photocatalytic experiment above.

Photocurrent and Mott–Schottky measurements

First, the original ITO glass was washed with acetone (30 min), ethanol (30 min), and water (30 min) by ultrasonication. The 5.0 mg catalyst was dispersed in 0.5 mL of ethanol and then treated with ultrasonics for 5 h. The obtained suspension was added to the 1.5 cm × 2 cm ITO glass drop by drop. Before the photoelectrochemical measurement, the ITO glass was treated in a vacuum at 150 °C for 2 h. The CHI 660B electrochemical workstation equipped with three electrodes was used for photoelectrochemical experiments. An aqueous solution of 0.5 M Na2SO4 was used as the electrolyte. Using standard three electrodes, the catalyst-coated ITO was used as the working electrode, Pt foil was used as the counter electrode, and the Ag/AgCl electrode was used as the reference electrode. The Mott-Schottky diagram was obtained at the frequencies of 1000 and 1500 Hz in the range of −1 ~ 1 V vs Ag/AgCl.

PCO2R measurement

The PCO2R experiments were carried out in a custom-made reactor with a quartz glass top (illuminated area approximately 1 cm²). 5 mg of catalyst was uniformly spread on a glass fiber cloth after plasma cleaning and then placed into the reactor. Except for the temperature comparison experiment, all other experiments were conducted at room temperature (without any external heat source). A PLS-SXE300 Xe lamp (Beijing Perfect-Light Technology Co. Ltd.) with different reflectors and cut filters was used to simulate UV-vis, NIR, and full-spectrum. The light intensities can be adjusted continuously by changing the current of the xenon lamp and the optical path to the reactor. The light intensity on the sample surface was measured by an optical power meter (CEL-NP2000-2A, Beijing China Education Au-light Co., Ltd.), and the measuring range of wavelength was 190 − 11000 nm. Before irradiation, the whole reaction system was purged with CO2 and H2O vapor for 1 h to remove the gaseous impurity. High-purity CO₂ was introduced into the reaction chamber through a mass flow controller, while H2O was injected into the chamber using a syringe pump, which can precisely control the amount of each reactant. The temperature of the catalyst bed was measured by a K-type thermocouple (DT-8891E) and an infrared thermometer (Fisher Scientific). The gas products were qualitatively and quantitatively detected using an Agilent GC-8890 gas chromatograph equipped with a TDX-01 column, a thermal conductivity detector (TCD), and a flame ionization detector (FID) with ultra-high purity argon as the carrier gas. The liquid products were quantified by a liquid chromatography (1260 Infinity II LC System, Agilent Technologies, Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a refractive index detector (RID) and a column from Bio-Rad.

To detect the difference between photothermal and traditional thermal catalysis, an IKA heating plate equipped with a thermocouple was used as a heat source for both the heating zone and reaction area to test the thermal catalytic activity.

Isotopic labeling experiments

13CO2 gas (isotopic purity 99%) was used as the carbon source instead of pure 12CO2 gas (chemical purity 99.999%), and the same photocatalytic process was used for isotope labeling measurement. The high-purity Ar was purged at a flow rate of 8 sccm for 60 min to remove any existing CO2 in the reactor. The reactor was then exposed to a 300 W Xe lamp for 1 h while continuously bubbling and stirring at a flow rate of 13CO2 and 12CO2 at 30 mL/min. Photocatalytic species were separated into individual substances via gas chromatography columns. The origin of products was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Trace 1310 GC-ISQ quadrupole MS, ThermoFisher, USA).

To confirm the oxygen source of O2, the labeled H218O experiment was performed as follows: CO2 was purged continuously into the reactor for 60 min. Then, 1 mL of H218O was introduced into the reactor. The temperature was controlled at room temperature. Then, the photocatalytic reaction experiment was conducted as before by irradiating the mixture for 1 h. The gas samples from the reactor were collected and analyzed by mass spectrometry.

Equations evaluating PCO2R

The production rate, the selectivity, and the AQE were calculated as follows.

Production rate. The mass-normalized production rate of product i was calculated as55:

ri(μmol g1h1)=Nimcatt 2

where Ni is the amount of product i (μmol), mcat is the catalyst mass (g), and t is the irradiation time (h).

Amount of gaseous products. For continuous-flow analysis, the amount of product

i was obtained from the outlet flow rate and the measured volume fraction:

Ni(mol)=Fout(Vi/100)Vm 3

where Fout is the total outlet flow rate (sccm), Vi is the volume percentage of product i (vol%), and Vm= 22.414 L mol–1 is the molar volume of an ideal gas at 273.15 K and 1 atm.

Selectivity. The electron-based selectivity toward the product i was calculated as:

Si(%)=ni×Nijnj×nj×100% 4

where ni is the number of electrons required to form one molecule of product i, and the summation index j refers to all detected reduction products.

AQE, the light was filtered by different monochromatic filters to test the PCO2R, and the AQE was calculated as:

AQE(%)=neNprodNph×100% 5

where ne is the electron number per product molecule (for CH4, ne= 8); Nprod is the amount of the target product formed (mol).

Nph=IAtλhc 6

where Nph is the total number of incident photons during the irradiation time t; I is the incident light intensity (W m–2); A is the illuminated area (m2); t is the irradiation time (s); λ is the incident wavelength (m); and h and c are Planck’s constant and the speed of light, respectively.

COMSOL Multiphysics simulations

The finite element modeling (FEM)-based numerical framework in COMSOL Multiphysics 6.3 was used to numerically solve the frequency domain form of Maxwell’s equation:

×μr1(×E)k02(εrjσωε0)E=0 7

where k0 represents the wavenumber, ω is the angular frequency, E is the scattered field; ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, μr, εr, and σ represent the properties of the material, namely, relative permeability, relative permittivity, and electrical conductivity, respectively.

The frequency domain module and thermal conduction module are coupled in one model, in which a single spherical Bi@Fe2O3 nanoparticle is illuminated by the linear polarized plane wave, with a power density of 2.5 mW μm–2. The core radius and shell thickness of the Bi@Fe2O3 nanoparticle are 50 and 5 nm, respectively, in line with the TEM and SEM images. A spherical computational domain with a perfectly matched layer (PML) was implemented. To characterize the thermal effects of the plasma itself, the heat-transfer analysis was carried out by solving the steady-state form of the heat equation:

UT=kρCp2T+qρCp 8

where T is the temperature, U is the velocity vector, k, ρ, and Cp are the local properties, namely, thermal conductivity, density, and heat capacity, respectively. The heat source term q(r) induced by LSPR is given by the equation:

q(r)=ω2ε0Im(εr)E(r)2 9

where ω is the angular frequency of the incident light, ε0 is the vacuum permittivity of the material, and εr is the complex relative permittivity, and E(r) is the local electric field. Optical constants and heat-transfer parameters for Bi, Fe2O3, and water were taken from the built-in Optical Materials Database. Due to the small length scale of the nanoparticle, the Grashof number is negligible, and the convective contribution to heat transfer can be neglected. Thus, heat transfer was modeled using the conduction equation in a sufficiently large domain that approximates an infinite medium.

Note: (i) The PML is a non-reflective boundary condition that absorbs outgoing electromagnetic waves, minimizing spurious reflections to accurately model wave propagation in unbounded domains.

ii) Due to the high symmetry, only a quarter of the model is simulated to reduce computational costs.

iii) Due to the low air mass fraction, water’s properties are applied to the medium.

DFT calculations

The spin-polarized first-principles calculations in this study were performed using DFT as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP, version 5.4.4)56. The interactions between valence electrons and ionic cores were described using the projector augmented wave (PAW) method57,58, which ensures accurate treatment of the core-valence interactions. The exchange-correlation energy was treated with the revised Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (RPBE) functional within the framework of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)59. A kinetic energy cutoff of 500 eV was employed for the plane-wave basis set to ensure convergence of the total energy.

All structural optimizations were conducted using the conjugate gradient algorithm until the residual force on each atom was less than 0.05 eV/Å, and the electronic self-consistent field (SCF) convergence criterion was set to 10–6 eV. Brillouin zone integrations were carried out using a Γ-centered 2 × 3 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack k-point grid for the slab models. Gaussian smearing with a width of 0.05 eV was applied for electronic occupations. Where necessary, dipole corrections were applied to eliminate spurious interactions between periodic images. For surface and adsorption calculations, a vacuum layer of at least 15 Å was added along the direction perpendicular to the slab to avoid image interactions. To illustrate the long-range dispersion interactions between the adsorbates and catalysts, we employed the D3 correction method by Grimme et al.60. All calculations were carried out under periodic boundary conditions.

The free energy change (ΔG) of each elementary step was estimated using the following thermodynamic correction:

ΔG=ΔE+ΔZPE+0TΔCpdTTΔS 10

where ΔE is the DFT total energy difference between initial and final states, ΔZPE is the zero-point energy correction, 0TΔCpdT represents the thermal contribution to the enthalpy, and ΔS is the entropy change. All thermodynamic corrections were obtained from vibrational frequency analysis and processed using the VASPKIT package61.

Note: It should be noted that although the experimentally synthesized Bi@Fe2O3 catalyst exhibits a core@shell architecture, constructing a full-scale core@shell model is hardly possible in DFT calculations. Therefore, as commonly reported in previous studies6265, simplified slab-based models are employed to approximate the essential physicochemical features of core@shell systems.

In a conventional stacked slab model (a layered “vertical” slab model, Supplementary Fig. 57), the Bi/Fe2O3 interface is buried and inaccessible to reactant molecules, so that it is extremely difficult to investigate the interfacial electronic effects under CO2/H2O coexisting conditions. To better represent the realistic reaction microenvironment at the interface, a new Bi@Fe2O3 interfacial model was constructed by loading Bi nanoparticles onto the Fe2O3 slab. A layer of 16 H2O molecules was introduced above the surface to account for solvation and interfacial electric-field effects66.

Although this model represents a geometric simplification of the ideal core@shell structure, it captures the intrinsic electronic interaction at the Bi@Fe2O3 heterojunction. Importantly, the charge redistribution and activation mechanisms observed in this interfacial model reflect the intrinsic chemical nature of the Bi@Fe2O3 heterojunction. The resulting theoretical insights are therefore directly relevant to understanding the experimentally observed high selectivity for CO2 reduction to CH4 under CO2 and H2O coexisting conditions. Considering all computational constraints and mechanistic requirements, we believe that the adopted modeling approach provides a more physically meaningful and experimentally consistent theoretical description of the catalytic mechanism proposed in this work.

Supplementary information

Source data

Source Data (1MB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Basic Science Center Program for Ordered Energy Conversion of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52488201) and the 2025 Annual Science and Technology Support Project of Daqingshan Laboratory (No. 2025KYPT0188). The authors also acknowledge the support from the Computing Center in Xi'an, as well as the Instrumental Analysis Center and HPC Platform of Xi’an Jiaotong University.

Author contributions

X.K. designed research, carried out the experiments, analyzed the experimental data, and wrote the manuscript. M.J. performed DFT calculations and analyzed data. J.L. performed COMSOL Multiphysics simulations and analyzed data. C.L., X.D., F.W., and S.B. helped analyze data. Y.L. and L.G. helped revise the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Hong Chen, Lingzhi Wang, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Data are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Xiaofeng Kang, Mingyu Jiang, Jiarong Lv.

Contributor Information

Ya Liu, Email: yaliu0112@xjtu.edu.cn.

Liejin Guo, Email: lj-guo@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-70960-9.

References

  • 1.Lei, T. et al. Global iron and steel plant CO2 emissions and carbon-neutrality pathways. Nature622, 514–520 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonchio, M. et al. Best practices for experiments and reporting in photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal.6, 657–665 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wu, Y. A. et al. Facet-dependent active sites of a single Cu2O particle photocatalyst for CO2 reduction to methanol. Nat. Energy4, 957–968 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kang, X., He, Z., Wang, F., Liu, Y. & Guo, L. Decrypting the controlled product selectivity over tunable Ni─Co bimetallic alloy for photoreduction CO2. Adv. Funct. Mater.35, 2419802 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.An, J., Ge, S., Wang, G. & Fu, H. Photocontrolled heterojunctions constructed from holmium single atom modified Mg1.2Ti1.8O5/g-C3N4 with enhanced photocatalytic CO2 conversion. Energy Environ. Sci.17, 5039–5047 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ma, Y. et al. Selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction in aerobic environment by microporous Pd-porphyrin-based polymers coated hollow TiO2. Nat. Commun.13, 1400 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Feng, X. et al. Unlocking bimetallic active sites via a desalination strategy for photocatalytic reduction of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nat. Commun.13, 2146 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li, Y., Li, B., Zhang, D., Cheng, L. & Xiang, Q. Crystalline carbon nitride supported copper single atoms for photocatalytic CO2 reduction with nearly 100% CO selectivity. ACS Nano14, 10552–10561 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jiang, L. et al. An innovative CuxAg50−x/UiO66-NH2 photocatalyst prepared using a dual ship bottling strategy for photocatalytic CO2 reduction: controlled product selectivity and pathways. Energy Environ. Sci.17, 8228–8242 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karmakar, S. et al. Confining charge-transfer complex in a metal-organic framework for photocatalytic CO2 reduction in water. Nat. Commun. 14, 4508 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Liu, Y. & Zhou, Y. Synergistic mechanisms of dual-metal single-atoms catalysts for promoting CO2 photoreduction: bifunctional, intersite distance, and electronic effects. ACS Catal.15, 10957–10970 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang, J., Li, L., Wei, R. & Dong, R. Quantum dot-based micromotors with NIR-I light photocatalytic propulsion and NIR-II fluorescence. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces14, 48967–48975 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kamath, A., Melnychuk, C. & Guyot-Sionnest, P. Toward bright mid-infrared emitters: thick-shell n-type HgSe/CdS nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 19567–19575 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jain, P. K., Huang, X., El-Sayed, I. H. & El-Sayed, M. A. Noble metals on the nanoscale: optical and photothermal properties and some applications in imaging, sensing, biology, and medicine. Acc. Chem. Res.41, 1578–1586 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eustis, S. & El-Sayed, M. A. Why gold nanoparticles are more precious than pretty gold: noble metal surface plasmon resonance and its enhancement of the radiative and nonradiative properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem. Soc. Rev.35, 209–217 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Olson, J. et al. Optical characterization of single plasmonic nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev.44, 40–57 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jiang, X. et al. Plasmonic active “Hot Spots”-confined photocatalytic CO2 reduction with high selectivity for CH4 production. Adv. Mater.34, 2109330 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cortie, M. B. & McDonagh, A. M. Synthesis and optical properties of hybrid and alloy plasmonic nanoparticles. Chem. Rev.111, 3713–3735 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Skrabalak, S. E., Au, L., Li, X. & Xia, Y. Facile synthesis of Ag nanocubes and Au nanocages. Nat. Protoc.2, 2182–2190 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hu, C. et al. Surface plasmon enabling nitrogen fixation in pure water through a dissociative mechanism under mild conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 7807–7814 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guo, J. et al. Boosting hot electrons in hetero-superstructures for plasmon-enhanced catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 17964–17972 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang, X. et al. Product selectivity in plasmonic photocatalysis for carbon dioxide hydrogenation. Nat. Commun.8, 14542 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zheng, Z., Tachikawa, T. & Majima, T. Plasmon-enhanced formic acid dehydrogenation using anisotropic Pd–Au nanorods studied at the single-particle level. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 948–957 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mukherjee, S. et al. Hot electrons do the impossible: plasmon-induced dissociation of H2 on Au. Nano Lett.13, 240–247 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yu, S. & Jain, P. K. Plasmonic photosynthesis of C1–C3 hydrocarbons from carbon dioxide assisted by an ionic liquid. Nat. Commun.10, 2022 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yu, S., Wilson, A. J., Heo, J. & Jain, P. K. Plasmonic control of multi-electron transfer and C–C coupling in visible-light-driven CO2 reduction on Au nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 18, 2189–2194 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang, Y. et al. Surface-plasmon-driven hot electron photochemistry. Chem. Rev.118, 2927–2954 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Polte, J. Nucleation and growth of gold nanoparticles studied via in situ small angle X-ray scattering at millisecond time resolution. ACS Nano4, 1076–1082 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhan, C. et al. From plasmon-enhanced molecular spectroscopy to plasmon-mediated chemical reactions. Nat. Rev. Chem.2, 216–230 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Clavero, C. Plasmon-induced hot-electron generation at nanoparticle/metal-oxide interfaces for photovoltaic and photocatalytic devices. Nat. Photonics8, 95–103 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Swearer, D. F. et al. Heterometallic antenna−reactor complexes for photocatalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA113, 8916–8920 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mubeen, S. et al. An autonomous photosynthetic device in which all charge carriers derive from surface plasmons. Nat. Nanotechnol.8, 247–251 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Griffiths, J. et al. Resolving sub-angstrom ambient motion through reconstruction from vibrational spectra. Nat. Commun.12, 6759 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lin, Q. Optical suppression of energy barriers in single molecule-metal binding. Sci. Adv.8, eabp9285 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cai, M. et al. Greenhouse-inspired supra-photothermal CO2 catalysis. Nat. Energy6, 807–814 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang, N. et al. Enhanced selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over homoatomic dinuclear sites in defective α-Fe2O3. Chem. Eng. J.426, 131845 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cui, X. et al. Photothermal nanomaterials: a powerful light-to-heat converter. Chem. Rev.123, 6891–6952 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gao, W. et al. Photo-driven syngas conversion to lower olefins over oxygen-decorated Fe5C2 catalyst. Chem. 4, 2917–2928 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen, Y.-Z. et al. Singlet oxygen-engaged selective photo-oxidation over Pt nanocrystals/porphyrinic MOF: the roles of photothermal effect and Pt electronic state. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 2035–2044 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mao, C. et al. Beyond the thermal equilibrium limit of ammonia synthesis with dual temperature zone catalyst powered by solar light. Chem. 5, 2702–2717 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang, K. et al. Modeling the effect of Cu doped TiO2 with carbon dots on CO2 methanation by H2O in a photo-thermal system. Appl. Catal. B Environ.256, 117780 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li, J. et al. Sunlight induced photo-thermal synergistic catalytic CO2 conversion via localized surface plasmon resonance of MoO3−x. J. Mater. Chem. A7, 2821–2830 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang, W. et al. Photocatalytic C–C coupling from carbon dioxide reduction on copper oxide with mixed-valence copper(I)/copper(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 2984–2993 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang, J. et al. Dynamic behavior of single-atom catalysts in electrocatalysis: identification of Cu–N3 as an active site for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 14530–14539 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang, L. et al. Selective reduction of CO to acetaldehyde with CuAg electrocatalysts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA117, 12572–12575 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chang, X., Malkani, A., Yang, X. & Xu, B. Mechanistic Insights into electroreductive C–C coupling between CO and acetaldehyde into multicarbon products. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 2975–2983 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Garza, A. J., Bell, A. T. & Head-Gordon, M. Mechanism of CO2 reduction at copper surfaces: pathways to C2 products. ACS Catal.8, 1490–1499 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Peng, B., Zhang, K., Sun, Y., Han, B. & He, M. Role of water in green carbon science. J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 13083–13100 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhu, J. et al. Asymmetric triple-atom sites confined in ternary oxide enabling selective CO2 photothermal reduction to acetate. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 131845 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shangguan, W. et al. Molecular-level insight into photocatalytic CO2 reduction with H2O over Au nanoparticles by interband transitions. Nat. Commun.13, 3894 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wu, X. et al. Identification of the active sites on metallic MoO2−x nano-sea-urchin for atmospheric CO2 photoreduction under UV, visible, and near-infrared light illumination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.62, e202213124 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ma, Z. et al. Selectivity reversal of photocatalytic CO2 reduction by Pt loading. Catal. Sci. Technol.8, 5129–5132 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang, R. et al. Photocatalytic oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane using CO2 as a soft oxidant over Pd/TiO2 catalysts to C2H4 and syngas. ACS Catal.8, 9280–9286 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cui, Y. et al. A chiral mesostructured photocatalyst for efficient solar-driven CO2 reduction to ethanol. Nat. Synth.5, 117–128 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gurudayal, G. et al. Efficient solar-driven electrochemical CO2 reduction to hydrocarbons and oxygenates. Energy Environ. Sci.10, 2222–2230 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Furthmu¨ller, G. K. J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B54, 169–186 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B50, 17953–17979 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Joubert, G. K. D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B59, 1758–1775 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hammer, B., Hansen, L. B. & Nørskov, J. K. Improved adsorption energetics within density-functional theory using revised Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof functionals. Phys. Rev. B59, 7413–7421 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang, V., Xu, N., Liu, J.-C., Tang, G. & Geng, W.-T. VASPKIT: a user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Comput. Phys. Commun.267, 108033 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang, Z. et al. Cavity-confined Au@Cu2O yolk-shell nanoreactors enable switchable CH4/C2H4 selectivity. Nat. Commun.16, 7559 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tsao, C.-W. et al. Dual-plasmonic Au@Cu7S4 yolk@shell nanocrystals for photocatalytic hydrogen production across visible to near infrared spectral region. Nat. Commun.15, 413 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sun, Z. et al. Atomic dispersed Co on NC@Cu core-shells for solar seawater splitting. Adv. Mater.36, 2406088 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Xu, Z. et al. Exploring the mechanisms of charge transfer and identifying active sites in the hydrogen evolution reaction using hollow C@MoS2-Au@CdS nanostructures as photocatalysts. Adv. Mater.37, 2501091 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang, X. et al. Efficient electrically powered CO2-to-ethanol via suppression of deoxygenation. Nat. Energy5, 478–486 (2020). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Source Data (1MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Data are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES