Abstract
Background
Bacterial urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a noteworthy cause of lower urinary tract disease both in humans and companion animals, especially in patients with systemic comorbidities or underlying anatomical or functional urinary tract abnormalities. Aerococcus species are increasingly recognised as opportunistic uropathogens in human medicine; however, their role in UTIs in companion animals remains poorly characterised.
Case presentation
The case of a neutered male European Shorthair cat with a history of antepubic urethrostomy and recurrent lower urinary tract signs, in which urine culture yielded a pure growth of Aerococcus mictus, is herein described. Species identification was achieved by whole-genome sequencing, which underscores the value of modern diagnostic tools in recognizing organisms that are often misclassified by conventional methods. The cat was successfully treated with targeted antimicrobial therapy.
Conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of A. mictus as a causative agent of UTI in a cat, supporting its potential role as an opportunistic uropathogen in companion animals, highlighting the risk of misidentification among closely related Aerococcus species, and emphasizing the need for updated MALDI-TOF reference databases in veterinary microbiology.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12917-026-05462-3.
Keywords: FLUTD, Infected urolithiasis, MALDI-TOF/MS, Whole-genome sequencing
Background
Urinary tract infection (UTI) refers to the adherence, multiplication and persistence of an infectious agent within the urogenital system that causes an associated inflammatory response and clinical signs [1]. The diagnosis of lower UTIs relies on the presence of lower urinary tract signs (LUTS) together with urinalysis findings and confirmation by quantitative bacterial urine culture [2]. Historically, bacterial UTIs were considered uncommon in cats, with early studies reporting a prevalence of < 3% among cats presenting with LUTS [2]; however more recent investigations indicate higher yet variable prevalence rates, ranging from 8% to 12% [3]. This variability likely reflects differences in study populations and diagnostic approaches, including case definitions, urine collection methods, and culture protocols. Prevalence is higher in older cats (over 10 years of age) likely due to the greater incidence of metabolic and systemic comorbidities [4]. Nonetheless, although bacterial UTIs are relatively uncommon in younger cats, the risk increases in the presence of predisposing local factors, including structural abnormalities, urolithiasis, chronic lower urinary tract disease, or iatrogenic factors [2]. Bacterial feline UTIs typically result from ascending entry of opportunistic bacteria from the host enteric or distal urogenital flora [2]. Among these, Escherichia coli is consistently reported as the most common isolated pathogen, accounting for 39–59% of positive urine cultures, followed by Streptococcus species (2–19%), Enterococcus faecalis (5–27%) and Staphylococcus felis (17–20%) [3, 5–9].
In recent years, emerging organisms associated with UTIs have gained increasing attention in human medicine. Notably, the genus Aerococcus (Gram-positive, α-haemolytic, catalase-negative cocci), specifically A. urinae and A. sanguinicola, has been recognized as opportunistic uropathogens, particularly in elderly patients with underlying urogenital diseases or structural/functional urological abnormalities [10]. With regard to A. urinae, recent taxonomic revisions have led to a proposed reorganization of the former A. urinae complex into distinct species. Among these, A. mictus has been differentiated from A. urinae on both genomic and phenotypic grounds [11]. Despite the growing clinical relevance of aerococcal UTIs in humans, reports of Aerococcus species as uropathogens in companion animals remain scarce and may be underestimated due to misidentification within the Aerococcus urinae complex. In this report, we describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and management of an aerococcal UTI in a cat and provide definitive species-level identification of the isolate. Species assignment was confirmed by whole-genome sequencing, thereby documenting what appears to be the first published feline case of UTI caused by Aerococcus mictus.
Case presentation
A four-year-old neutered male European Shorthair cat, weighing 4.4 kg, was presented for evaluation of stranguria, pollakiuria and haematuria of approximately three weeks duration.
At five months of age, the cat underwent an antepubic urethrostomy following a traumatic urethral rupture. Thereafter, the medical history was notable for recurrent culture-confirmed UTIs. The first episode occurred approximately six months post-urethrostomy and yielded E. coli on urine culture; a subsequent episode was associated with E. faecalis. In both instances, the isolates did not display antimicrobial resistance profiles, and clinical and microbiological resolution was achieved with antimicrobial therapy guided by susceptibility testing. Approximately 18 months before the current presentation, the cat underwent cystotomy for urolith removal; this episode was associated with a Pasteurella multocida UTI and likewise resolved following susceptibility-guided antimicrobial treatment. A further UTI episode occurred approximately six months before the current presentation, with E. coli isolated on urine culture and subsequent resolution with targeted antimicrobial therapy.
On admission, the patient was afebrile (rectal temperature 38.5 °C), with normal vital parameters, good nutritional status, and normal hydration status. Physical examination revealed severe urine scald dermatitis affecting the antepubic region surrounding the urethrostomy site, likely secondary to ongoing urinary leakage; no evidence of urethral obstruction was identified at presentation. The cat also appeared painful on abdominal palpation and showed marked discomfort on palpation of the skin lesion. Abdominal ultrasonography (A-FAST) showed a moderately filled urinary bladder with an irregular and mildly thickened wall. The bladder lumen contained suspended echogenic sediment, and two hyperechoic shadowing structures measuring approximately 8.3 and 5.8 mm, respectively, which were consistent with uroliths. Evaluation of the upper urinary tract did not reveal abnormalities. Two irregularly marginated radiopaque densities within the bladder lumen were confirmed by abdominal radiography, consistent with the presence of uroliths. Complete blood count (Siemens, ADVIA 2120, Erlangen, Germany) and biochemistry results (Beckman Coulter, Clinical Chemistry Analyzer AU680, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were within reference intervals; selected renal markers were urea 45 mg/dL (RI 35–76) and creatinine 1.2 mg/dL (RI 0.7–1.8). The urinalysis showed a specific gravity (USG) of 1.014, determined through refractometer measurement (Leica Vet 360, Misco Products Division, Cleveland, OH, USA). The low USG was interpreted as consistent with increased water intake, as the cat had been fed a wet diet with additional water supplementation since the onset of clinical signs. Dipstick analysis (Combur 9 Test, Roche, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) indicated a pH of 7.5 and marked haematuria. Urine sediment was prepared by centrifuging 5 mL of urine for 10 min at 900 × g and a 12 µL aliquot of the resuspended sediment was examined microscopically. Sediment examination confirmed marked haematuria (100 RBCs/hpf), along with pyuria (50 WBCs/hpf), struvite crystals, and numerous cocci (observed both extracellularly and within leukocytes on the cytospin-prepared, stained slide).
Urine obtained by ultrasound-guided cystocentesis was cultured using a semi-quantitative method with a calibrated 10 µl loop on 5% horse blood agar (Oxoid) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h under aerobic conditions. No antibiotic treatment had been administered before the current urine culture; the last course of antimicrobial therapy dated back to the previous UTI episode, approximately six months earlier. After incubation, a pure and heavy growth (> 100,000 CFU per milliliter) of small α-haemolytic colonies was observed. Species identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK MS, bioMérieux) indicated A. urinae with 91.2% confidence (SARAMIS Knowledge base version 4.17). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution using Sensititre COMPGP1F plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood (CAMHB-LHB; Oxoid), in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [12]. Because specific veterinary breakpoints for Aerococcus species are limited, results were interpreted using a combined approach. Interpretation was performed for penicillin, ampicillin, nitrofurantoin, tetracycline and vancomycin based on recently proposed CLSI M45 breakpoints [13], whereas results for all other antimicrobials were interpreted descriptively and are reported in Supplementary Table S1. No bacterial growth was observed in any antimicrobial-containing wells, whereas the growth control showed adequate growth, indicating inhibition at all tested antimicrobial concentrations. The strain was therefore considered fully susceptible to all antimicrobials included in the panel. The full MIC values are presented in Supplementary Table S1.
Whole-genome sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq platform, followed by de novo assembly of 586,903 paired-end reads with SPAdes with default parameters [14] and quality assessment with CheckM [15], yielded a 2.03-Mb genome (42.2% GC content; 99.97% completeness; 82× mean genome coverage) containing 1,835 coding sequences within 95 contigs (largest contig of 415.3 kbp; N50 of 215.8 kbp). Raw sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA1373523. Taxonomic assignment with PubMLST species identification [16] classified the isolate as A. mictus, with 98% support. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis calculated with FastANI further supported this assignment, with the feline isolate being closer to the reference A. mictus genome Au-59-B15 (98.6% ANI), than the other A. urinae complex species, namely A. urinae reference strain CCUG 36,881 (92.5% ANI) [17], A. loyolae reference strain CDC-3352-U95 (93.9% ANI) and A. tenax reference strain UMB7049 (95.4% ANI). Notably, the ANI value relative to A. mictus exceeded the generally accepted 95–96% threshold for species delineation [18]. Screening for antimicrobial-resistance genes using ABRicate against both the ResFinder and CARD databases [19, 20] revealed no acquired resistance determinants, consistent with the phenotypic susceptibility profile. Similarly, no virulence determinants were identified by screening for virulence genes against the virulence factor database (VFDB) [21].
A diagnosis of infected urolithiasis, most consistent with struvite uroliths, was established based on urinalysis findings (alkaline urine pH, abundant struvite crystals), imaging results and urine culture; however, urolith composition was not analytically confirmed. The medical management plan consisted of susceptibility-guided antimicrobial therapy with oral amoxicillin/clavulanate (20 mg/kg every 12 h) for four weeks, combined with a wet diet and increased water intake to facilitate urolith dissolution. The prolonged antimicrobial course was chosen because the infection was complicated by concurrent urolithiasis, as bacteria may persist within or be released from infected uroliths during treatment [22].
At the 4-week follow-up, ultrasonography demonstrated a progressive reduction in the size of the uroliths which measured approximately 5.5 mm and 5.2 mm. Urinalysis revealed a specific gravity of 1.033 and a pH of 7.5, with persistent struvite crystalluria and haematuria but no evidence of pyuria, while urine culture was negative, thereby confirming resolution of the infection. In the light of the suboptimal USG and pH for struvite dissolution, review of the feeding history revealed poor dietary compliance, as the cat was receiving a mixed wet and dry diet not specifically formulated to acidify urine. Therefore, the ongoing therapeutic plan recommended stricter dietary management aimed at urine acidification, together with strategies to increase water intake, to be maintained until complete dissolution of the uroliths. Further follow-up beyond the reported re-evaluation was not available due to poor owner compliance, limiting confirmation of long-term outcome and complete urolith dissolution.
Discussion and conclusions
This report describes a feline UTI caused by A. mictus, confirmed by whole-genome sequencing, and underscores that closely related Aerococcus species may be under-recognised in veterinary urinary diagnostics due to limitations of routine identification methods.
While regarded as opportunistic or low-virulence organisms, Aerococcus species have emerged in human medicine as clinically relevant causes of UTIs, particularly in elderly patients and those with chronic comorbidities or structural or functional urological abnormalities [10], such as those with urinary diversion procedures, prostatic disease, or indwelling catheters [23]. In the present case, A. mictus was isolated in pure culture from a cystocentesis sample, supporting its role as the primary etiologic agent. Nonetheless, the affected cat had substantial predisposing factors, including antepubic urethrostomy and concurrent urolithiasis [24], that likely impaired local host defence mechanisms, facilitating opportunistic colonisation by A. mictus and subsequent infection.
The increasing detection of Aerococcus species is attributed not only to an ageing population with increasing urological comorbidities but also to improved diagnostic accuracy. In this regard, Aerococcus species are easily overlooked due to their phenotypic similarity to other Gram-positive cocci and their slow growth in routine cultures, leading to historical underreporting [25]. Recent advances in clinical microbiology, including the widespread use of MALDI-TOF, the introduction of selective enrichment media, and the increasing use of molecular techniques, have improved the ability of diagnostic laboratories to detect uncommon or previously misclassified pathogens [26, 27]. In parallel, whole-genome sequencing has recently refined the taxonomy of pathogenic genera, including the genus Aerococcus, with a substantial diversity within what was historically grouped as A. urinae cluster [11]. These genomics insights have led to the reclassification of several isolates from human urinary samples that were initially identified as A. urinae, including the reassignment to newly delineated species such as A. mictus [28].
Although A. urinae has been associated in humans with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, ranging from asymptomatic bacteriuria to pyelonephritis, sepsis, and infective endocarditis [23], the clinical significance of A. mictus remains largely unknown. Its absence from clinical descriptions likely reflects its recent recognition and prior misclassification within the A. urinae complex. In the present report, the organism was initially identified as A. urinae by MALDI-TOF using SARAMIS Knowledge base version 4.17, where A. mictus is absent, whereas whole-genome sequencing confirmed it as A. mictus, highlighting the need to update MALDI-TOF reference spectrogram libraries to enable reliable discrimination of closely related Aerococcus species.
Evidence from clinical studies indicates that outcomes are most favourable when antimicrobial therapy is initiated promptly, whereas delayed identification or inadequate treatment increases the risk of systemic complications [29]. In the present case, the isolate exhibited full susceptibility to the antimicrobials tested, and targeted therapy resulted in rapid clinical improvement and microbiological clearance, as evidenced by a negative follow-up urine culture. The persistence of struvite crystalluria and uroliths despite infection resolution underscores the importance of addressing concurrent urinary tract abnormalities, as these factors may predispose to recurrent infections irrespective of the causative organism. This favourable response reinforces the principle that early organism-level identification and timely, appropriate antimicrobial selection are essential for managing opportunistic pathogens such as A. mictus, particularly in patients with underlying structural urinary tract alterations. Accordingly, Aerococcus species should be considered when Gram-positive cocci are observed in cystocentesis-derived urine from cats with LUTS or predisposing urinary tract abnormalities, and isolates should be identified to species level whenever feasible. In addition, molecular confirmation may be warranted when routine methods identify uncommon or unexpected uropathogens. However, veterinary data on Aerococcus species, and particularly on A. mictus, remain very limited. To the best of our knowledge, no previous reports are currently available in cats or, more broadly, in companion animals. Therefore, although findings from human medicine may help contextualize the possible clinical relevance of this isolate, their interpretation in a veterinary setting should remain cautious until further animal data become available.
We acknowledge some limitations. First, as a single case report, the findings cannot be generalised to the broader feline population, and the clinical relevance of A. mictus as a uropathogen in cats remains to be established through larger studies. Second, although the organism was isolated in pure culture from a cystocentesis sample, the presence of multiple predisposing factors, including antepubic urethrostomy and urolithiasis, complicates the assessment of its pathogenic role relative to opportunistic colonisation. Third, antimicrobial susceptibility results were interpreted only for few antimicrobials due to the lack of established veterinary-specific breakpoints for Aerococcus species. Finally, long-term follow-up was not available due to limited owner compliance, precluding assessment of recurrence risk and complete resolution of uroliths.
In conclusion, although based on a single clinical observation, this case suggests that A. mictus may be clinically relevant in feline urinary tract disease and raises the possibility that recently defined Aerococcus species could act as opportunistic pathogens in cats with underlying urogenital abnormalities. It also highlights the risk of misidentification of closely related Aerococcus species using routine diagnostic methods and underscores the need for increased clinical awareness and updated MALDI-TOF reference spectrogram libraries to accurately assess the clinical relevance of these organisms in veterinary medicine.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Authors’ contributions
**AU: ** conducted the investigation, curated the data, and drafted the original version of the manuscript. **MP: ** contributed to the investigation and data curation and critically revised the manuscript. **MAC, GT and AZ: ** contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript and to the editing of the final text. **LG and FG: ** supervised the work and contributed to the critical revision and editing of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors did not receive any subsidies for the study.
Data availability
Raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA1373523. Additional data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication of this case report was obtained from the cat’s owner.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wood MW. Lower urinary tract infections. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC, Côté E, editors. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine. 8th ed. St. Louis, MO: St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 1992–6. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dorsch R, Teichmann-Knorrn S, Lund H, FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY. Urinary Tract Infection and Subclinical Bacteriuria in Cats a Clinical Update. Volume 21. JOURNAL OF; 2019. pp. 1023–38. 11Located at: WOS:000491051500001. 10.1177/1098612X19880435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Teichmann-Knorrn S, Reese S, Wolf G, Hartmann K, Dorsch R. Prevalence of feline urinary tract pathogens and antimicrobial resistance over five years. Vet Rec. 2018;183(1):21–21. 10.1136/vr.104440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lekcharoensuk C, Osborne CA, Lulich JP. Epidemiologic study of risk factors for lower urinary tract diseases in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001;218(9):1429–35. 10.2460/javma.2001. 218.1429 PubMed PMID: 11345305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martinez-Ruzafa I, Kruger JM, Miller R, Swenson CL, Bolin CA, Kaneene JB. Clinical features and risk factors for development of urinary tract infections in cats. J Feline Med Surg. 2012;14(10):729–40. 10.1177/1098612X12451372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marques C, Gama LT, Belas A, Bergström K, Beurlet S, Briend-Marchal A, et al. European multicenter study on antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from companion animal urinary tract infections. BMC Vet Res. 2016;12(1):213. 10.1186/s12917-016-0840-3. PubMed PMID: 27658466; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5034465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lund HS, Skogtun G, Sørum H, Eggertsdóttir AV. Antimicrobial susceptibility in bacterial isolates from Norwegian cats with lower urinary tract disease. J Feline Med Surg. 2015;17(6):507–15. 10.1177/1098612X14550171. PubMed PMID: 25216729; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10816785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dorsch R, von Vopelius-Feldt C, Wolf G, Straubinger RK, Hartmann K. Feline urinary tract pathogens: prevalence of bacterial species and antimicrobial resistance over a 10-year period. Vet Rec. 2015;176(8):201–201. 10.1136/vr.102630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bailiff NL, Westropp JL, Nelson RW, Sykes JE, Owens SD, Kass PH. Evaluation of urine specific gravity and urine sediment as risk factors for urinary tract infections in cats. Vet Clin Pathol. 2008;37(3):317–22. 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2008.00065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rosales-Castillo A, Jiménez-Guerra G, Ruiz-Gómez L, Expósito-Ruíz M, Navarro-Marí JM, Gutiérrez-Fernández J. Emerging Presence of Culturable Microorganisms in Clinical Samples of the Genitourinary System: Systematic Review and Experience in Specialized Care of a Regional Hospital. J Clin Med. 2022;11(5):1348. 10.3390/jcm11051348. PubMed PMID: 35268439; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8911399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Choi BI, Ene A, Du J, Johnson G, Putonti C, Schouw CH, et al. Taxonomic considerations on Aerococcus urinae with proposal of subdivision into Aerococcus urinae, Aerococcus tenax sp. nov., Aerococcus mictus sp. nov., and Aerococcus loyolae sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol. 2023;73(9):006066. 10.1099/ijsem.0.006066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing M100. 32nd edn. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Maynard R, Manuel C, Simpkins S, Haro M, Ledeboer N, Simner PJ, et al. Development of disk diffusion susceptibility test methods for Aerococcus spp. and updates to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute MIC breakpoints. J Clin Microbiol. 2025;63(6):e0011525. 10.1128/jcm.00115-25. PubMed PMID: 40366161; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12153260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler. Curr Protocols Bioinf. 2020;70(1):e102. 10.1002/cpbi.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–55. 10.1101/gr.186072.114. PubMed PMID: 25977477; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4484387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:124. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1. PubMed PMID: 30345391; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6192448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Carkaci D, Dargis R, Nielsen XC, Skovgaard O, Fuursted K, Christensen JJ. Complete Genome Sequences of Aerococcus christensenii CCUG 28831T, Aerococcus sanguinicola CCUG 43001T, Aerococcus urinae CCUG 36881T, Aerococcus urinaeequi CCUG 28094T, Aerococcus urinaehominis CCUG 42038 BT, and Aerococcus viridans CCUG 4311T. Genome Announc. 2016;4(2):e00302–16. 10.1128/genomeA.00302-16. PubMed PMID: 27103727; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4841142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol. 2014;64(Pt2):346–51. 10.1099/ijs.0.059774-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(11):2640–4. 10.1093/jac/dks261. PubMed PMID: 22782487; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3468078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, et al. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D566–73. 10.1093/nar/gkw1004. PubMed PMID: 27789705; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5210516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen L, Yang J, Yu J, Yao Z, Sun L, Shen Y, et al. VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Database Issue):D325–8. 10.1093/nar/gki008. PubMed PMID: 15608208; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC539962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weese JS, Blondeau JM, Boothe D, Breitschwerdt EB, Guardabassi L, Hillier A, et al. Antimicrobial Use Guidelines for Treatment of Urinary Tract Disease in Dogs and Cats: Antimicrobial Guidelines Working Group of the International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases. Veterinary Med Int. 2011;2011:1–9. 10.4061/2011/263768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rasmussen M. Aerococcus: an increasingly acknowledged human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(1):22–7. 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.09. .026 PubMed PMID: 26454061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Griffin DW, Gregory CR. Prevalence of bacterial urinary tract infection after perineal urethrostomy in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992;200(5):681–4. PubMed PMID: 1568912. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cattoir V, Kobal A, Legrand P. Aerococcus urinae and Aerococcus sanguinicola, two frequently misidentified uropathogens. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010;42(10):775–80. 10.3109/00365548.2010. .485576 PubMed PMID: 20482457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Christensen JJ, Kilian M, Fussing V, Andresen K, Blom J, Korner B, et al. Aerococcus urinae: polyphasic characterization of the species. APMIS. 2005;113(7–8):517–25. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm_183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Opota O, Prod’hom G, Andreutti-Zaugg C, Dessauges M, Merz L, Greub G, et al. Diagnosis of Aerococcus urinae infections: Importance of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and broad-range 16S rDNA PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(1):e1–2. 08.026 PubMed PMID: 26363405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Choi BI, Fontes Noronha M, Kaindl J, Wolfe AJ. Complete genome sequences of Aerococcus loyolae ATCC TSD-300T, Aerococcus mictus ATCC TSD-301T, and Aerococcus tenax ATCC TSD-302T. Microbiol Resour Announc 13(6):e00156–24. 10.1128/mra.00156-24 PubMed PMID: 38651909; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC11237779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Christensen JJ, Vibits H, Ursing J, Korner B. Aerococcus-like organism, a newly recognized potential urinary tract pathogen. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(5):1049–53. 10.1128/jcm.29.5.1049-1053. 1991 PubMed PMID: 2056040; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC269932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA1373523. Additional data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
