Abstract
Background
Genital ulcer disease (GUD), a common clinical presentation at health facilities in Uganda, is often caused by sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and increases the risk of HIV. Family planning (FP) methods are effective for preventing unintended pregnancies, while some methods, namely male and female condoms, also reduce the risk of STI transmission. However, little has been documented about FP use among individuals with GUD in Uganda.
Methods
Patients with clinician-confirmed genital ulcers were enrolled for a GUD study at six sites across government clinics and community outreaches in Kampala, Wakiso, and Kalangala, Uganda, between July/2023 and June/2024. Demographic, behavioral, and family planning use data were collected in English and Luganda using prespecified questionnaires. Urine and genital swabs were collected for gonorrhea and chlamydia testing and blood for HIV and syphilis antibodies using rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). Pregnant women were excluded from the analysis. Associations with FP use were explored using rank sum tests, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate.
Results
Of 104 participants with confirmed genital ulceration, 75(72.1%) were women, 12(16.0%) of whom were pregnant. Overall, of 92 non-pregnant participants, 36(39.1%) had a reactive HIV RDT; 10(27.8%) were new diagnoses. Nine (9.8%) had positive tests for gonorrhea, chlamydia, or syphilis. No men reported condom use. Of the 63 non-pregnant female participants analyzed, 29(46.0%) reported current FP use. Subdermal implants were the most used method in 15/29(51.7%). Twenty-one (33.3%) reported ≥ 2 sexual partners in the past 3 months. FP use was significantly associated with younger age, being married, transactional sex, ≥ 2 sexual partners in the past 3 months, and being sexually active in the past month.
Conclusion
More than one-sixth of women with GUD were pregnant. The uptake of FP among individuals with GUD was low, and HIV/STI prevalence was high. Effective FP has a key role in preventing unintended pregnancies and mother-to-child transmission of STIs. These findings highlight the need for educational and policy strategies to increase sensitization on sexual health, including increasing uptake of FP and encouraging male condom use in a population at high risk of STIs.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40834-026-00456-w.
Keywords: Family planning, Contraceptives, Genital ulcers, Sexually transmitted infections, Sexual heath, HIV, Uganda
Introduction
The total fertility rate (TFR), the number of children born per woman, has been declining for decades [1]; the smallest declines occurred in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [2], with a fertility rate of 4.5 [3]. Uganda’s TFR of 4.7 is among the top 20 globally [4].
A cornerstone of maternal health, family planning (FP) is codified in Sustainable Development Goal 3.7, which aims to achieve “universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services, including family planning, information and education, and integration of reproductive health into national strategies and programs [5].” In 2022, the global family planning prevalence of any method was estimated at 65%, and of modern methods at 58.7% for married or in-union women [6]. Uganda faces significant challenges in meeting family planning needs; recent data revealed the use of modern FP among married women was 38%, with 22% experiencing unmet FP needs [7].
Modern contraceptives include male and female sterilization, male and female condoms, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), subdermal implants (SDI), oral contraceptives, lactational amenorrhea, intrauterine devices (IUD), and emergency contraception [8]. While FP is a key strategy in preventing unintended pregnancies, only condoms are effective at preventing both pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STI), including HIV [6]. The use of male condoms for dual protection was reported in 35–55% of adolescents in SSA, including Uganda [9]. Women with HIV in SSA face gaps in access to sexual and reproductive health services, with only 20–43% using contraception, despite 67–92% wanting to limit childbearing [10]. Reducing the unmet need for contraception in women living with STIs, including HIV, can not only improve reproductive health outcomes but also reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission [11].
STIs that cause genital ulcer disease (GUD), such as syphilis, Mpox, and herpes simplex virus [12], can cause preterm delivery, fetal demise, and serious morbidity in newborns [13, 14]. Syphilis rates in pregnant women in Uganda are high; in one study in Kampala in 2019–2020, syphilis prevalence was 5.9% [15]. Despite STIs being a marker of high-risk sexual behaviors, FP choices in people with GUD in Uganda have not been previously evaluated. We assessed current FP use in adults with clinician-confirmed genital ulcer disease in three districts in central Uganda.
Methods
Study setting
An observational cohort study assessing the epidemiology and etiology of GUD was conducted from July 2023 to June 2024 at three government health centers and three community health posts in Kampala, Wakiso, and Kalangala, Uganda [16]. Data from the baseline study visit are presented.
Study population
Potential participants, men and women aged 18 years and above, attending health facilities seeking care for GUD symptoms were referred to the study team after completion of their clinical care visit, which included syndromic management of STIs per Ugandan treatment guidelines [17]. Additionally, we reached those who were not actively seeking health care at health centers through community mobilizations by village health teams (VHT) [18, 19]. VHTs were located in urban slums in Kampala and Wakiso and on the Kalangala islands.
Study procedures
After study initiation at the clinical sites, the study team sensitized clinicians to inform potentially eligible patients about the study and to refer them to the study team. In community venues, VHTs were asked to mobilize their communities; they actively engaged residents through home visits and private indoor discussions while discreetly identifying individuals with signs and symptoms of STIs and GUD. Potential participants were advised that they could go to a particular community post on the designated day to meet the study team. After consent, a physical examination was performed by a research clinician to confirm the presence and nature of genital ulceration prior to enrollment. Those who did not have GUD, had taken antibiotics with anti-treponemal activity in the past 28 days, were not willing to provide samples for STI testing, or who were deemed too ill were excluded. Participants were screened and enrolled consecutively after they were seen by a clinician at the health facility or registered their interest in participation with the VHT.
After enrollment, demographic, socio-behavioral, and clinical data were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires. Data were captured using the REDCap mobile application (Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, USA), which were checked weekly by the study data manager for completeness to ensure quality. Sociodemographic characteristics included age, sex, marital status, level of education, employment status, recruitment site (clinic vs. community), and alcohol and drug use. Sexual behavior data included sexual activity in the past one month, any involvement in transactional sex in the past 6 months, and the number of sex partners in the past 3 months. Clinical data included the type of FP used at the time of enrollment: men were asked about condom use and vasectomy; women were asked about DMPA injectables, oral contraceptives, SDI, emergency contraception, condoms, IUD, and tubal ligation. STI testing and treatment history were also collected.
Using standard venipuncture techniques, study clinicians collected blood for HIV and syphilis antibody rapid diagnostic tests (SD Bioline duo, Abbot Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ); the results were returned to the participants on the day of recruitment. Self-collected genital swabs for women and urine for men were transported on the same day to the Translational Research Laboratory at the Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) and tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng) and Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) using nucleic acid amplification tests (Xpert, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Test results were issued within one working day following receipt.
Participants who tested positive for treponemal antibodies, Ng, or Ct were treated according to Ugandan national treatment guidelines [17] by the study team unless appropriate treatment had already been provided at the health facilities as part of syndromic management. Participants newly identified with HIV were referred to the nearest health facility for confirmatory laboratory testing and initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART).
Statistical analysis
FP methods used by the female partners of male participants were not assessed; therefore, the main analysis was restricted to female participants. Sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics were described for all female participants and by FP status (current use vs. no use) using frequencies and proportions or medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for categorical or numeric data, respectively. Group differences by FP use status were compared using rank sum test, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using STATA version 17.0 (College Station, Texas, USA).
Ethical oversight
In Uganda, the IDI Research Ethics Committee (IDI-REC-2022-26) and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS2728ES) approved the study. Approval was also obtained from the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board (IRB:00376680). No study procedures were commenced until written informed consent had been obtained either in Luganda or English per participant preference. Participants were not compensated for joining the study but were provided with 40,000 UGX (~ 11 USD) for transportation. No costs for testing, treatment, or referral were incurred by participants.
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants
In total, 104 participants were enrolled; 72.1% (75 of 104) were women, of whom 16.0% (12 of 75) were pregnant; data from 92 participants (of whom 68.5% (63) were non-pregnant women) were analyzed. Two thirds (63.5%) were enrolled from community, non-clinical sites. Baseline socio-demographic characteristics, sexual behaviors, methods of FP, and results of diagnostic tests for the female participants are presented in Table 1. The median (IQR) age was 29(24-38) years; 31.7% were < 25 years old. All women who provided responses were less than 53 years old; none were post-menopausal.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics and Family Planning Uptake in Ugandan women with Genital Ulcer Disease
| Variable | All n = 63 (100.0) n(col%) |
Family Planning Use | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes n = 29 (46.0) n (col%) |
No n = 34 (54.0) n (col%) |
|||
| Age (years) Median (IQR) | 29 (24–38) | 26 (22–30) | 33 (27–41) | 0.002 a |
| Age range (years) | 0.024 | |||
| ≤ 24 | 20 (31.7) | 14 (48.3) | 6 (17.6) | |
| 25–34 | 22 (34.9) | 9 (31.0) | 13 (38.2) | |
| ≥ 35 | 21 (33.3) | 6 (20.7) | 15 (44.1) | |
| Marital status | 0.035 c | |||
| Single, never married | 17 (27.0) | 11 (37.9) | 6 (17.6) | |
| Married, cohabiting | 31 (49.2) | 15 (51.7) | 16 (47.1) | |
| Separate, divorced & widowed | 15 (23.8) | 3 (10.3) | 12 (35.3) | |
| Study site | 0.060 | |||
| Clinic | 23 (36.5) | 7 (24.1) | 16 (47.1) | |
| Community | 40 (63.5) | 22 (75.9) | 18 (52.9) | |
| HIV status (Self-reported) | 0.643c | |||
| Positive | 19 (30.2) | 8 (27.6) | 11 (32.3) | |
| Negative | 35 (55.6) | 18 (62.1) | 17 (50.0) | |
| Unsure | 9 (14.3) | 3 (10.3) | 6 (17.6) | |
| Highest level of education | 0.765c | |||
| < Primary seven | 25 (39.7) | 12 (41.4) | 13 (38.2) | |
| ≥Primary seven | 35 (55.5) | 15 (51.7) | 20 (58.8) | |
| None | 3 (4.8) | 2 (6.9) | 1 (2.9) | |
| Employment | 0.214 | |||
| Employed | 44 (69.8) | 18 (62.1) | 26 (76.5) | |
| Unemployed | 19 (30.2) | 11 (37.9) | 8 (23.5) | |
| Family planning method used b | na | |||
| Condom use | 3 (10.3) | 3 (10.3) | na | |
| Injections (DMPA) | 8 (27.6) | 8 (27.6) | na | |
| Subdermal implant (SDI) | 15 (51.7) | 15 (51.7) | na | |
| Coil or IUD | 3 (10.3) | 3 (10.3) | na | |
| Transactional sex (in past 6 M) | 0.002 c | |||
| Yes | 18 (28.6) | 14 (48.3) | 4 (11.8) | |
| No | 45 (71.4) | 15 (51.7) | 30 (88.2) | |
| Number sexual partners (in past 3 M) | 0.026 c | |||
| None | 6 (9.5) | 0 (0%) | 6 (17.6) | |
| 1 | 36 (57.1) | 16 (55.2) | 20 (58.8) | |
| ≥ 2 | 21 (33.3) | 13 (44.8) | 8 (23.5) | |
| Alcohol use (in past 3 M) | 0.946 | |||
| Yes | 22 (34.9) | 10 (34.5) | 12 (35.3) | |
| No | 41 (65.1) | 19 (65.5) | 22 (64.7) | |
| Previously tested for an STI including HIV | 0.770c | |||
| Yes | 6 (9.5) | 3 (10.3) | 3 (8.8) | |
| No | 53 (84.1) | 25 (86.2) | 28 (82.3) | |
| Unsure | 4 (6.3) | 1 (3.5) | 3 (8.8) | |
| Prior STI treatment | 0.297 | |||
| Yes | 26 (41.3) | 14 (48.3) | 12 (35.3) | |
| No | 37 (58.7) | 15 (51.7) | 22 (64.7) | |
| Sexually active (in past 1 M) | 0.006 c | |||
| Yes | 48 (76.2) | 27 (93.1) | 21 (61.8) | |
| No | 15 (23.8) | 2 (6.9) | 13 (38.2) | |
| Illicit drug use (in past 6 M) | 0.326c | |||
| Yes | 4 (6.3) | 3 (10.3) | 1 (2.9) | |
| No | 59 (93.6) | 26 (89.7) | 33 (97.1) | |
| HIV (antibody on RDT) | 0.080 | |||
| Positive | 27 (42.9) | 9 (31.0) | 18 (52.9) | |
| Negative | 36 (57.1) | 20 (69.0) | 16 (47.1) | |
| Syphilis (treponemal antibody on RDT) | 0.999c | |||
| Positive | 6 (9.5) | 3 (10.3) | 3 (8.8) | |
| Negative | 57 (90.5) | 26 (89.7) | 31 (91.2) | |
| Ng NAAT | 0.694c | |||
| Positive | 7 (11.1) | 4 (13.8) | 3 (8.8) | |
| Negative | 56 (88.9) | 25 (86.2) | 31 (91.2) | |
| Ct NAAT | 0.999c | |||
| Positive | 6 (9.5) | 3 (10.3) | 3 (8.8) | |
| Negative | 57 (90.5) | 26 (89.7) | 31 (91.2) | |
| Any curable STI* | 0.712 | |||
| Yes | 16 (25.4) | 8 (27.6) | 8 (23.5) | |
| No | 47 (74.6) | 21 (72.4) | 26 (76.5) | |
P-valuea by rank sum test, P-value by chi-square, P-valuec Fishers exact test, bonly one participant had dual contraception (condoms and SDI), M – months, DMPA- Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, IUD- Intrauterine device, RDT – rapid diagnostic test, Ng Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Ct Chlamydia trachomatis
*Any of syphilis, Ng, Ct
Similar proportions were either married or cohabiting 49.2% (31 of 63) or single, never married, separated, divorced, or widowed 50.8% (32 of 63). Most (69.8%) were employed; 28.6% (18 of 63) had engaged in transactional sex in the previous 6 months. The majority (84.1%) had never been tested for STIs, including HIV. Three quarters (76.2%) reported sex in the previous month. HIV prevalence was 36/92(39.1%); 10(27.8%) were new HIV diagnoses. Twenty-three participants had a curable STI; syphilis, gonorrhea, or chlamydia; 9/92(9.8%) each. Of those with negative HIV tests, 5/56(8.9%) reported current use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
Prevalence of family planning uptake
None of the 29 male participants reported condom use or vasectomy. Of the women, 46.0% (29 of 63) reported current FP use; data on the full study population can be found in Supplementary Table 1. Among women who used FP, the SDI was reported in 51.7% (15 of 29). More than one quarter, 27.6% (8 of 29), reported DMPA use. In contrast, condoms and IUDs were the least used methods, each reported by 10.3% (3 of 29) of women. Notably, only one participant reported dual methods, specifically condoms and SDI. No women reported the use of emergency contraception, oral contraceptives, or tubal ligation.
Among female participants who reported transactional sex (n = 18), 14(77.8%) reported FP use; of these 3(21.4%) reported condom use, 3(21.4%) injectables, and 8(57.1%) SDIs. Among female participants with HIV (n = 27), 9(33.3%) reported FP use; 3(33.3%) reported using condoms, 2(22.2%) injectables, and 4(44.4%) SDIs.
Factors that were significantly associated with family planning uptake
FP use in women was significantly associated with younger median age, being married/cohabiting, sex work, ≥ 2 sex partners in the past 3 months, and sexual activity in the past month. There was no significant association between FP use and HIV or curable STI status or previous STI testing and treatment (Table 1).
Discussion
Among patients with GUD with a high prevalence of HIV, FP use was low in women and absent in men. Women’s FP use is consistent with other studies; in a nationally representative sample of 9,235 Ugandan women of reproductive age (15–49 years), 53.19% reported FP use [20]; in a study in Butaleja in eastern Uganda, 34% of women reported FP use [21]. Modern contraceptive use in SSA between 1995 and 2020 was 22%, with SDI reported as the most common [22], consistent with our findings. Another study conducted in Gulu City, Uganda, also reported the SDI as the most common method at 52.4% [23], possibly reflecting preference for discreet, effective methods that do not require daily adherence, or differences in availability of long-acting reversible FP methods. African men’s involvement in FP was low as in other studies [24, 25], and has been attributed to limited knowledge, social stigma, and patriarchal notions and norms [26].
Various studies highlight barriers to FP uptake at the individual level, such as fear of side effects [27, 28] lack of knowledge about FP, and misconceptions [29]. Community-level factors such as discouragement from relatives and close friends [29], and health facility-level factors such as unavailability of the preferred method and absence of trained personnel [30].
Despite the enhanced risk of HIV acquisition in people with GUD, less than 10% of HIV-uninfected participants reported HIV PrEP use. Inadequate knowledge about PrEP, including concerns related to side effects and stigma, may both limit uptake and adherence [31], suggesting overall limitations in sexual health education. Only one participant reported dual contraception; other studies reveal modest use of dual contraception. In a cross-sectional study conducted among female sex workers (FSW) in urban Uganda, dual contraception use was 58% [32]. In a northern Ugandan study, dual contraception was reported in 45% [33]. Taken together, these studies suggest that Ugandan women attending clinical services and those residing in urban slums might not be adequately informed about the benefits of dual contraception.
Younger age was significantly associated with FP use, consistent with several studies among Ugandan and Zambian women, where increasing age was inversely associated with modern FP use [34, 35]. Likewise, in high fertility countries in SSA, younger women were more likely to use FP [36]. A cross-sectional study among postpartum women in western Uganda reported that younger mothers were more likely to use postpartum FP [37]. In an urban setting, Ugandan women aged 40–49 years reported lower contraceptive uptake compared to those aged 15–24 years [38]. Younger age is associated with higher fertility [39], which may make younger women more vigilant about FP.
Being married or cohabiting was associated with FP use. This was also highlighted in a Tanzanian study among women of reproductive age [40]. Spousal communication and partner support in longer-term relationships may facilitate decision making and uptake of FP.
There were two predictable positive associations with FP use: sex work and recent sexual activity. One-third of the female participants reported transactional sex in the previous 6 months; most of these women reported FP use, possibly reflecting increased concern about unplanned pregnancies due to the nature of sexual encounters. In northern Uganda, 48.6% of the FSW interviewed reported at least one unintended pregnancy during sex work [41]. A study across SSA revealed that only 19% of FSW were planning a pregnancy [42]. Similarly, we found that having two or more sexual partners was significantly associated with FP use. Heightened unintended pregnancy and STI risks may explain the higher use of FP in this group of women. Higher reported use of FP in participants who reported sex in the past month is consistent with the results of another Ugandan study where women cited not being sexually active as their reason for not using contraceptives [38].
In our study, one-third of female participants with HIV reported FP use, similar to another study conducted in urban Uganda, where the uptake of FP was 38.4% among women with HIV on ART [38]. A systematic review and meta-analysis among women of reproductive age with HIV in SSA found that the pooled prevalence of unmet FP need was 30.1% [43], while globally, 14.9% of women of reproductive age in the general population had an unmet need [6]. Potential explanations for the low FP uptake in women with HIV in our study include a high prevalence of undiagnosed HIV and lack of FP services integrated into HIV care [44].
Our study has several strengths, including describing FP use in women with GUD who are at high risk of vertically transmitting STIs and may greatly benefit from effective FP. It also has limitations; the study was conducted among people with GUD and therefore cannot be generalized to other populations in Uganda. Other natural methods of FP, like lactational amenorrhea and the standard days method, were not assessed; this may have underestimated FP use. There was lack of information on reasons for non-use and potential confusion between condom use for contraception or HIV/STI prevention, which could have impacted the reliability of findings on condom use as a family planning method. Men were not asked about their partners’ FP use, which may have underestimated adequate FP within their relationships. Conversely, social desirability bias may have caused under- or overestimation of FP uptake; this was mitigated by asking personal questions at the end of the interview after establishing adequate rapport with the participants. The study sample was small and precluded multivariate analysis due to the low case number per event in relevant subgroups.
Conclusion
Pregnancy was common in women with GUD. That two-thirds were enrolled outside of clinical settings suggests barriers to healthcare access. Despite clear behavioral risks in a setting where HIV/STI prevalence was high, FP uptake remained low, but consistent with other Ugandan studies. These findings underscore the need to strengthen sexual health services, promote FP education to increase uptake of FP overall, and encourage male condom use to prevent pregnancies and STIs. Community outreaches should educate the public and health care workers about GUD-associated risks and the benefits of effective FP in reducing mother-to-child transmission of STIs.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge all study participants, staff at the study sites, community leaders and the VHTs for the support rendered. We also acknowledge Vivian Nakate who conducted the primary data analysis, Joseph Musaazi who provided statistical advice, Dr. Peter Kyambadde MBChB, MPH from the STI Control Programme, Ministry of Health (MoH), Uganda who provided MoH support and guidance, Ann Beatrice Magoro who collected data and Dr. Agnes Kiragga who contributed to the study design.
Abbreviations
- ART
Antiretroviral Therapy
- DMPA
Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
- FP
Family Planning
- GUD
Genital Ulcer Disease
- HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- IDI
Infectious Diseases Institute
- IQR
Interquartile Range
- IUD
Intrauterine Device
- NAATs
Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests
- PrEP
Pre–Exposure Prophylaxis
- RDT
Rapid Diagnostic Test
- REC
Research Ethics Committee
- SDI
Subdermal Implant
- SSA
Sub–Sahara Africa
- STIs
Sexually Transmitted Infections
- TFR
Total Fertility Rate
- USA
United States of America
- VHT
Village Health Team
Author contributions
BMD collected the data and wrote the first draft, RPR provided study oversight, initial editing and reviewed the manuscript, AO collected the data and provided study oversight, EM and GK conducted lab tests, reviewed, and edited the manuscript, MMH and YCM designed the study, provided funding support, and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by a Johns Hopkins University Discovery Award (MMH) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institute of Health under award number U54EB007958 (YCM). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute of Health.
Data availability
Data is available from the senior author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Yukari C. Manabe and Matthew M. Hamill Joint senior authors.
References
- 1.Fauser BC, Adamson GD, Boivin J, Chambers GM, de Geyter C, Dyer S, et al. Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update. 2024;30(2):153–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cheng H, Luo W, Si S, Xin X, Peng Z, Zhou H, et al. Global trends in total fertility rate and its relation to national wealth, life expectancy and female education. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Group. Fertility rate, total, (births per woman) - Sub-Saharan Africa. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 26]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=ZG.
- 4.World Bank Group. Fertility rate, total (births per woman) - Uganda. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 26]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=UG.
- 5.United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs. Sustainable development. 2025. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal3#targets_and_indicators.
- 6.World Health Organization. Family planning/contraception methods. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 26]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception.
- 7.Uganda Bureau of Statistics. Uganda demographic and health survey (UDHS) key findings. 2023 [cited 2025 May 01]. Available from: https://www.ubos.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/09_2023UDHS_2022_Key_Findings_Presentation_B.pd.
- 8.World Health Organization. Family planning/contraception methods. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception.
- 9.Kumakech E, Acen J, Musinguzi M, Ebong D, Okello J. Female-controlled dual protection methods: Prevalence, predictors, experiences and perceptions among young women living with HIV in northern Uganda–A mixed-method study protocol. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(10):e0290338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wanyenze RK, Matovu JK, Kamya MR, Tumwesigye NM, Nannyonga M, Wagner GJ. Fertility desires and unmet need for family planning among HIV infected individuals in two HIV clinics with differing models of family planning service delivery. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grant-Maidment T, Kranzer K, Ferrand RA. The effect of integration of family planning into HIV services on contraceptive use among women accessing HIV services in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Front Global Women’s Health. 2022;3:837358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cunha Ramos M, Nicola MRC, Bezerra NTC, Sardinha JCG, Morais JSS, Schettini AP. Genital ulcers caused by sexually transmitted agents. An Bras Dermatol. 2022;97(5):551–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Andrievskaya IA, Zhukovets IV, Dovzhikova IV, Ishutina NA, Petrova KK. The Effect of HSV-1 Seropositivity on the Course of Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Condition of Newborns. Microorganisms. 2022;10(1):176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schlueter A, Doshi U, Garg B, Hersh AR, Caughey AB. Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with maternal syphilis infection. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):5828–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Simiyu A, Atuheire CGK, Taremwa M, Ssali SN, Mwiine FN, Kankya C, et al. Sero-prevalence of syphilis and associated risk factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at an urban-poor health centre in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2024;47:129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abstract book 2024 STI Prevention Conference. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 10]. Available from: https://stipreventionconference.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/2024-STI-Prevention-Conference_Abstract-Book_Final.pdf.
- 17.Ministry of Health Uganda. Uganda clinical guidelines 2023: national guidelines foe management of common health conditions. 2023 [cited 2025 Feb 0505/02/2025]. Available from: https://library.health.go.ug/sites/default/files/resources/Uganda%20Clinical%20Guidelines%202023.pdf.
- 18.Nalugga EA, Kukundakwe M, Tibakanya R, Tindyebwa E, Baluku W, Mulindwa K, et al. It takes a village; involvement of village health teams to develop tools and resources to communicate about antiretroviral use in pregnancy and breastfeeding at community level in Uganda. Wellcome Open Res. 2023;8:510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ministry of Health Uganda. Village health team: participants manual for village health team members. [cited 2025 Feb 04]. Available from: https://library.health.go.ug/sites/default/files/resources/VHT%20Participant%20Manual.pdf.
- 20.Towongo MF, Kelepile M. Prevalence, distribution and factors associated with modern contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Uganda: evidence from UDHS 2016. Contracept Reproductive Med. 2024;9(1):32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mubale F, Auma AG, Otim R, Atim N. Uptake of Modern Family Planning Among Postpartum Women Attending Postnatal Clinic in Busolwe Hospital, Butaleja District, Eastern Uganda. Healthc Stud. 2023;1(1):7–23. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boadu I. Coverage and determinants of modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa: further analysis of demographic and health surveys. Reproductive Health. 2022;19(1):18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bongomin F, Pebolo PF, Kibone W, Apio PO, Nsenga L, Okot J, et al. Dual contraceptive use and associated factors among female sex workers in Gulu City, Uganda in 2023. Trop Med Health. 2023;51(1):45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wambete SN, Serwaa D, Dzantor EK, Baru A, Poku-Agyemang E, Kukeba MW, et al. Determinants for male involvement in family planning and contraception in Nakawa Division, Kampala, Uganda; An urban slum qualitative study. PLOS Global Public Health. 2024;4(5):e0003207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mulatu T, Sintayehu Y, Dessie Y, Dheresa M. Male involvement in family planning use and associated factors among currently married men in rural Eastern Ethiopia. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10:20503121221094178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tekakwo A, Nabirye RC, Nantale R, Oguttu F, Nambozo B, Wani S, et al. Enablers and barriers of male involvement in the use of modern family planning methods in Eastern Uganda: a qualitative study. Contracept Reproductive Med. 2023;8(1):49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kawuma R, Lunkuse JF, Ssembajjwe W, Kayesu I, Price MA, Brickley DB, et al. I fear those things: non-uptake of contraceptives, and barriers to use among adolescent girls and young women at high risk of HIV infection in Kampala, Uganda. Front Reprod Health. 2023;5:1198672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hakizimana S, Odjidja EN. Beyond knowledge acquisition: factors influencing family planning utilization among women in conservative communities in Rural Burundi. Reproductive Health. 2021;18(1):94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mushy SE, Tarimo EA, Massae AF, Horiuchi S. Barriers to the uptake of modern family planning methods among female youth of Temeke District in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A qualitative study. Sex Reproductive Healthc. 2020;24:100499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nanvubya A, Wanyenze RK, Kamacooko O, Nakaweesa T, Mpendo J, Kawoozo B, et al. Barriers and facilitators of family planning use in fishing communities of Lake Victoria in Uganda. J Prim care community health. 2020;11:2150132720943775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nakamanya S, Kawuma R, Kibuuka D, Kusemererwa S, McCormack S, Ruzagira E, et al. Assessing acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among participants in an HIV vaccine preparedness study in southwestern Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(7):e0271104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bukenya JN, Wanyenze RK, Barrett G, Hall J, Makumbi F, Guwatudde D. Contraceptive use, prevalence and predictors of pregnancy planning among female sex workers in Uganda: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Erickson M, Goldenberg SM, Ajok M, Muldoon KA, Muzaaya G, Shannon K. Structural determinants of dual contraceptive use among female sex workers in Gulu, northern Uganda. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):91–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kananura RM, Birabwa C, Wasswa R, Ssanyu JN, Muluya KM, Namutamba S, et al. Intra-urban inequalities in modern family planning use in Uganda’s urban settings: the role of place of residence, socio-economic, family, and individual factors. medRxiv. 2023:2023.04.11.23288416.
- 35.Lasong J, Zhang Y, Gebremedhin SA, Opoku S, Abaidoo CS, Mkandawire T, et al. Determinants of modern contraceptive use among married women of reproductive age: a cross-sectional study in rural Zambia. BMJ open. 2020;10(3):e030980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Negash WD, Eshetu HB, Asmamaw DB. Predictors of modern contraceptive use among reproductive age women in high fertility countries in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from demographic and health surveys. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Akello F, Okorid F. Factors influencing uptake of post-partum family planning among mothers 0–6 weeks postpartum at Kiryandongo Hospital: a cross-sectional study. 2023.
- 38.Mbabazi L, Nabaggala MS, Kiwanuka S, Kiguli J, Laker E, Kiconco A, et al. Factors associated with uptake of contraceptives among HIV positive women on dolutegravir based anti-retroviral treatment-a cross sectional survey in urban Uganda. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Trawick E, Pecoriello J, Quinn G, Goldman KN. Guidelines informing counseling on female age-related fertility decline: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:41–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ngole BE, Joho AA. Factors influencing modern family planning utilization and barriers in women of reproductive age in the Iringa region, Tanzania: a mixed-methods study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2025;11:23779608251313897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ouma S, Tumwesigye NM, Abbo C, Ndejjo R. Factors associated with the uptake of long-acting reversible contraception among female sex workers in post-conflict Northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Reproductive Health. 2022;19(1):34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schwartz SR, Papworth E, Ky-Zerbo O, Sithole B, Anato S, Grosso A, et al. Reproductive health needs of female sex workers and opportunities for enhanced prevention of mother-to-child transmission efforts in sub-Saharan Africa. J Family Plann Reproductive Health Care. 2017;43(1):50–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bakari HM, Alo O, Mbwana MS, Salim SM, Ludeman E, Lascko T, et al. Prevalence of unmet need for family planning and unintended pregnancies among women of reproductive age living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Afr Health Sci. 2024;24(2):41–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nabirye J, Matovu JK, Bwanika JB, Makumbi F, Wanyenze RK. Missed opportunities for family planning counselling among HIV-positive women receiving HIV Care in Uganda. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data is available from the senior author upon reasonable request.
