Abstract
The significance of enterotoxin production and proliferative ability of Escherichia coli in the intestinal tract as related to porcine enteric colibacillosis was studied in 68 gnotobiotic pigs.
The animals were monocontaminated at seven to ten days of age with eight selected strains of E. coli. The strains were two naturally occurring porcine enteropathogens — P155 (0149:K91;K88a,c:H10) and P307 (08:K87;K88a,b:H19), two nonenteropathogenic strains — P104 (0139:K82:H1) and F11 (018-ab:K?:H14), and four enterotoxigenic derivatives of the above strains — P104(P155), P104(P307), F11(P155) and F11(P307). The response of the animals was evaluated on the basis of clinical observations and necropsy lesions 22 hours after exposure to the organisms. E.coli counts were determined at seven different levels of the intestinal tract. Cell free extracts of the intestinal contents were examined for enterotoxic activity by the ligated pig intestine loop test.
All of the strains possessing the enterotoxin plasmid produced enterotoxin in the pig's intestine and were capable of causing diarrhea. The nonenteropathogenic E. coli failed to do so. The strains possessing the P155 enterotoxin plasmid were more virulent than the corresponding derivatives with the P307 enterotoxin plasmid. Strains P155, P307 and P104(P155) proliferated in the upper small intestine at a greater rate and were more virulent than the other strains. The numbers attained in the upper small intestine by the other enterotoxigenic derivatives were comparable to those of their nonenteropathogenic parent strains.
It was considered that enterotoxin produced by E. coli was the essential factor for causing a diarrheic response in gnotobiotic pigs. The virulence of each of the tested strains appeared to be governed by the degree of enterotoxicity associated with a particular enterotoxin plasmid, the numbers attained by these organisms in the upper small intestine, (but not in the lower small intestine or in the colon), and by other undetermined factors.
Full text
PDF









Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alexander T. J., Miniats O. P., Ingram D. G., Thomson R. G., Thackeray E. L. Gnotobiotic pigs: procurement, microbial flora, serum proteins and lymphatic tissues. Can Vet J. 1969 Apr;10(4):98–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arbuckle J. B. The location of Escherichia coli in the pig intestine. J Med Microbiol. 1970 May;3(2):333–340. doi: 10.1099/00222615-3-2-333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen R., Kalser M. H., Arteaga I., Yawn E., Frazier D., Leite C. A., Ahearn D. G., Roth F. Microbial intestinal flora in acute diarrheal disease. JAMA. 1967 Sep 11;201(11):835–840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cross R. F., Kohler E. M. Autolytic changes in the digestive system of germfree, escherichia coli monocontaminated, and conventional baby pigs. Can J Comp Med. 1969 Apr;33(2):108–112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drees D. T., Waxler D. L. Enteric colibacillosis in gnotobiotic swine: a fluorescence microscopic study. Am J Vet Res. 1970 Jul;31(7):1147–1157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gyles C. L., Barnum D. A. A heat-labile enterotoxin from strains of Eschericha coli enteropathogenic for pigs. J Infect Dis. 1969 Oct;120(4):419–426. doi: 10.1093/infdis/120.4.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gyles C. L., Barnum D. A. Escherichia coli in ligated segments of pig intestine. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1967 Jul;94(1):189–194. doi: 10.1002/path.1700940124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gyles C. L., Stevens J. B., Craven J. A. A study of Escherichia coli strains isolated from pigs with gastro-intestinal disease. Can J Comp Med. 1971 Jul;35(3):258–266. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kenworthy R. Effect of Escherichia coli on germ-free and gnotobiotic pigs. I. Light and electron microscopy of the small intestine. J Comp Pathol. 1970 Jan;80(1):53–63. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(70)90031-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohler E. M., Bohl E. H. Studies of Escherichia coli in gnotobiotic pigs. I. Experimental reproduction of colibacillosis. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci. 1966 Jul;30(7):199–203. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohler E. M. Enterotoxic activity of filtrates of escherichia coli in young pigs. Am J Vet Res. 1968 Dec;29(12):2263–2274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohler E. M. Studies of escherichia coli in gnotobiotic pigs. IV. Comparison of enteropathogenic and nonenteropathogenic strains. Can J Comp Med Vet Sci. 1967 Nov;31(11):277–282. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miniats O. P., Mitchell L., Barnum D. A. Response of gnotobiotic pigs to Escherichia coli. Can J Comp Med. 1970 Jul;34(3):269–276. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miniats O. P. Response of gnotobiotic pigs to oral infection with an enteropathogenic and with an edema disease strain of Escherichia coli. Can Vet J. 1970 Mar;11(3):52–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moon H. W., Nielsen N. O., Kramer T. T. Experimental enteric colibacillosis of the newborn pig: histopathology of the small intestine and changes in plasma electrolytes. Am J Vet Res. 1970 Jan;31(1):103–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SMITH H. W., JONES J. E. OBSERVATIONS ON THE ALIMENTARY TRACT AND ITS BACTERIAL FLORA IN HEALTHY AND DISEASED PIGS. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1963 Oct;86:387–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith H. W., Gyles C. L. The relationship between two apparently different enterotoxins produced by enteropathogenic strains of Escherichia coli of porcine origin. J Med Microbiol. 1970 Aug;3(3):387–401. doi: 10.1099/00222615-3-3-387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith H. W., Halls S. Observations by the ligated intestinal segment and oral inoculation methods on Escherichia coli infections in pigs, calves, lambs and rabbits. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1967 Apr;93(2):499–529. doi: 10.1002/path.1700930211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith H. W., Halls S. Studies on Escherichia coli enterotoxin. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1967 Apr;93(2):531–543. doi: 10.1002/path.1700930212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]