Skip to main content
Global Cardiology Science & Practice logoLink to Global Cardiology Science & Practice
. 2026 Apr 30;2026(2):e202611. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2026.11

Cardiopulmonary bypass complications and their predictors in open-heart surgery at a tertiary cardiac care facility in Tanzania

Alfred D Luvakule 1,2, Silas F Gamba 1,✉, Edwin R Lugazia 1, Alex Loth 3
PMCID: PMC13197846  PMID: 42181784

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is integral to open-heart surgery but carries significant risks of systemic inflammatory response and organ-specific complications. In low-resource settings, limited local data can impede targeted prevention. This study assessed the frequency and predictors of CPB-related complications at the Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute, Tanzania.

Methods: A retrospective review examined 195 pediatric and adult patients who underwent open-heart surgery in 2020. Data from perfusion records and ICU charts were analyzed using descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression.

Results: Of the cohort, 55.4% were male and 52.3% were under 16 years. Valvular heart disease was the most common diagnosis (42.1%). At least one major complication occurred in 31.3% of patients, with cardiovascular (10.8%) and bleeding (9.2%) events predominating. Prolonged ICU stay affected 52.8% of cases and in-hospital mortality was 4.1%. Key predictors of complications included younger age, diagnosis type, procedure type, CPB duration, and cross-clamp time. CPB time exceeding 120 min significantly increased the likelihood of prolonged ICU stay.

Conclusions: CPB-related complications represent a substantial burden in this setting. Minimising CPB and cross-clamp durations may improve outcomes. Prospective locally driven research is needed to refine management strategies.

Introduction

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is an essential technique in open-heart surgery, enabling a bloodless, motionless operative field by diverting blood from the heart and lungs1. The process involves arresting the heart with cardioplegia while an extracorporeal circuit maintains circulation and oxygenation1–3. Although CPB is vital for many complex cardiac procedures, it is associated with important postoperative complications, including systemic inflammatory response syndrome, cardiovascular instability and multi-organ dysfunction4. These complications arise from factors such as contact between blood and the bypass circuit’s artificial surfaces, aortic cross-clamping, cardioplegia, transfusion of allogeneic blood and operative trauma5,6. Inflammatory and embolic mechanisms can impair the function of vital organs, particularly the heart, brain, lungs and kidneys, leading to increased morbidity and mortality when physiological reserves are exceeded4,7.

Globally, more than two million CPB procedures are performed each year, with over 250,000 in the United States alone8,9. In contrast, sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faces significant challenges due to limited resources, optimized personnel and infrastructure, resulting in an estimated open-heart surgery rate of only two per million population8. In Tanzania, access to advanced CPB technology, such as biocompatible circuit coatings, improved oxygenators and modern antifibrinolytic drugs, is inconsistent. Prolonged CPB times, suboptimal postoperative monitoring and the absence of optimized perioperative protocols may increase the risk of adverse outcomes6,10.

Most research into CPB-related complications originates from high-income countries, where clinical environments differ markedly from those in SSA. Differences in surgical case mix, patient characteristics, disease stage at presentation and perioperative support limit the applicability of international data to low-resource settings11. To date, no published study has evaluated the predictors of CPB-related complications in Tanzania, and few have done so within the broader SSA context. This knowledge gap makes it difficult to develop evidence-based strategies for improving outcomes.

This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of CPB-related complications in patients undergoing open-heart surgery at the Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute, Tanzania’s national cardiac referral centre. By identifying key risk factors associated with adverse outcomes, such as prolonged intensive care unit stays and postoperative organ dysfunction, we sought to provide evidence that could guide preventive strategies, optimize resource allocation and align local surgical outcomes with global standards.

Methods

This retrospective chart review was conducted at the Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute (JKCI), Tanzania’s national, university-affiliated tertiary cardiac referral centre. This study was approved by the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences Research Ethics Committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. As this was a retrospective chart review, the requirement for written informed patient consent was waived by the committee.

We included all patients who underwent cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass between 1 January and 31 December 2020. We identified 214 patients during this period. Of these, 19 (8.9%) were excluded due to incomplete or missing medical records: 11 were missing critical intraoperative perfusion data (CPB duration or cross-clamp time), 5 had incomplete postoperative ICU charts, and 3 had missing preoperative diagnostic information. Excluded patients did not differ systematically from included patients with respect to age or sex distributions based on available administrative data, although formal comparison was limited by the incomplete records. The final analytical sample comprised 195 patients (Figure 1). Sampling was consecutive and non-probabilistic.

Figure 1. Flowchart for patient selection, exclusions, and final sample.

Figure 1.

Data were obtained from perfusion records, intensive care unit charts and operative notes, and recorded using a structured data collection form. Variables included demographic characteristics (age, sex), preoperative diagnoses classified according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, and intraoperative details (type of surgery, duration of CPB, aortic cross-clamp time). Postoperative data included major complications, duration of intensive care unit stay, and mortality. Data collection was performed by trained intensive care nurses and perfusionists, following a predefined protocol to ensure accuracy.

Operational definition of ‘complication’

Postoperative complications were defined and classified as follows, consistent with established criteria where referenced.

Cardiovascular complications were defined as any of the following occurring within 30 days of surgery:

  • •

    Haemodynamic instability: sustained systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg or above 160 mmHg requiring intervention

  • •

    Low cardiac output syndrome: cardiac index below 2.0 L/min/m2 with end-organ hypoperfusion necessitating inotropic or mechanical circulatory support

  • •

    Unresponsive bradycardia

  • •

    Newly identified postoperative arrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation and sustained tachyarrhythmias, requiring pharmacological or electrical treatment

Bleeding complications were defined as any clinically significant haemorrhage meeting at least one of the following criteria:

  • •

    Re-exploration for bleeding

  • •

    Transfusion of four or more units of packed red blood cells within 24 h

  • •

    A haemoglobin fall exceeding 4 g/dL not attributable to haemodilution

Pulmonary complications were defined as any of the following:

  • •

    Radiographically confirmed atelectasis with clinical significance

  • •

    Pulmonary oedema requiring diuresis or ventilatory support

  • •

    Pleural effusion requiring intervention

Renal complications were defined as acute kidney injury (AKI) according to KDIGO criteria, comprising any of the following:

  • •

    Serum creatinine increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 h

  • •

    Serum creatinine rise to ≥1.5 × baseline within 7 days

  • •

    Urine output below 0.5 mL/kg/hour for six or more consecutive hours

Metabolic complications were defined as any of the following:

  • •

    Clinically relevant metabolic acidosis (pH below 7.30 or base excess below −6)

  • •

    Significant hyperkalaemia (serum potassium above 6.0 mmol/L)

  • •

    Persistent hyperglycaemia (blood glucose above 10 mmol/L) requiring insulin infusion

Infectious complications were defined as any postoperative infection occurring during the ICU stay, including:

  • •

    Surgical site infection

  • •

    Pneumonia

  • •

    Bloodstream infection

Diagnosis required confirmation by microbiological culture or established clinical criteria.

Prolonged ICU stay was defined as an ICU admission exceeding 48 h, consistent with prior studies in cardiac surgery.

Data analysis

Analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as mean (SD), or median (IQR) where data were non-normally distributed; categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage.

The χ2 test was used to assess univariate associations between categorical variables and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Univariate binary logistic regression was then applied to estimate unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for potential predictors. A formal multivariable model was not fitted, as the number of outcome events (n = 61) was insufficient relative to the number of candidate predictor variables; doing so would have risked overfitting. All reported ORs and CIs therefore derive from univariate analyses, which represents a key limitation of the study. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Demographic and preoperative characteristics

Of 195 patients, 108 (55.4%) were male. The largest age group was those younger than 16 years (102; 52.3%), while 42 (21.5%) were older than 45 years. Nearly half (94; 48.2%) weighed <30 kg, and 47 (24.1%) had a body surface area ≤0.6 m2. Repeat surgery was uncommon (6; 3.1%). Preoperative anaemia was present in 72 (36.9%) patients with haemoglobin <10 g/dl (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline demographic and preoperative characteristics of the patients open heart surgery.

Hgb, haemoglobin. All haemoglobin values are expressed in g/dL.

Variable Category Frequency, (N = 195) Percentage (%)
Sex Female 87 44.6
Male 108 55.4
Age (years) 0–15 102 52.3
15–30 26 13.3
30–45 25 12.8
>45 42 21.5
Weight (Kilograms) 0–30 94 48.2
31–60 46 23.6
61–90 45 23.1
>90 10 5.1
Body surface area (M 2 ) 0-0.6 47 24.1
0.6–1.1 44 22.6
1.1–1.7 56 28.7
>1.7 48 24.6
Redo operation Yes 6 96.9
No 189 3.1
Pre-operative Hgb (g/dl) <6.5 9 4.6
6.5–8.0 15 7.7
8.0–10 48 24.6
10.0–12 51 26.2
12.0–18 64 32.8
>18 8 4.1

Diagnostic categories and surgical procedures

Valvular heart disease was the most frequent diagnosis (82; 42.1%), followed by acyanotic congenital anomalies (51; 26.2%) and cyanotic congenital anomalies (33; 17.4%). Valve replacement was the most common procedure (73; 37.4%), followed by patch closure of septal defects (41; 21.0%) and repair of tetralogy of Fallot (27; 13.8%). Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 22 patients (11.3%) (Table 2).

Table 2. Type and frequency of diagnoses and surgical procedures among patients who underwent open heart surgery.

Reconstruction surgery = aortic arch reconstruction; combined = patch closure + valve, patch closure+ PDA ligation, Glenn hunt + PDA ligation, valve replacement + annuloplasty; palliative surgery = Glenn shunt, BT shunt; valve replacement= MVR, DVR, AVR, Valve repair = Mv Repair; acyanotic anomalies = VSD, ASD, PDA, AVSD, VSD + PDA, partial Av canal, coarctation of aorta; cyanotic anomalies = TOF, TAPVR, tricuspid atresia (TA), pulmonary atresia, double outlet right ventricle; coronary artery disease = CAD, TVD, DSS; valvular heart disease = mitral valve regurgitation (MR), mitral stenosis (MS), aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis (AS), tricuspid regurgitation (TR), MR + TR, MS + AS; acyanotic and valvular heart diseases = MS + MR + PDA, VSD + AS, ASD + PDA + TR; cyanotic and valvular heart diseases = TA + ASD.

Variable Frequency (N = 195) Percentage (%)
Diagnosis
Acyanotic and valvular heart diseases 5 2.6
Acyanotic heart anomalies 51 26.2
Coronary heart disease 22 11.3
Cyanotic and valvular heart diseases 1 0.5
Cyanotic heart anomalies 33 17.4
Valvular heart diseases 82 42.1
Procedure
Reconstruction surgery 1 0.5
Coronary artery bypass graft 22 11.3
Combined procedure 18 9.2
Palliative surgery 7 3.6
Patch closure 41 21
PDA ligation 2 1
TAPVR correction 1 0.5
ToF repair 27 13.8
Valve repair 3 1.5
Valve replacement 73 37.4

Complication profile and outcomes

Perioperative complications occurred in 61 patients (31.3%), most frequently cardiovascular events (21; 10.8%), bleeding (18; 9.2%), and pulmonary complications (12; 6.2%). Metabolic, infectious, and renal complications each occurred in ≤3.1% (Table 3). Prolonged ICU stay (>2 days) was observed in 103 patients (52.8%). There were 8 in-hospital deaths (4.1%), all occurring within the ICU during the postoperative period; 6 of these deaths were preceded by a documented major complication (4 cardiovascular, 1 bleeding, 1 combined metabolic and renal). The remaining 2 deaths occurred in patients without a recorded major complication from the pre-specified categories, and were attributed to refractory low cardiac output in the early postoperative period. Cause-specific mortality data were unavailable in full for all cases due to the retrospective design.

Table 3. Cardiopulmonary complications, length of ICU stay and outcome of patients undergoing open heart surgery.

Cardiovascular complications = hypertension, hypotension, low cardiac output syndrome, bradycardia, unresponsive bradycardia, postoperative arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, tachyarrhythmia); Metabolic abnormalities = acidosis, hyperkalemia, hyperglycemia; Pulmonary complications = atelectasis, pulmonary oedema, pleural effusion; Renal complications = acute kidney injury

Variable Frequency (N = 195) Percentage (%)
Complications
Yes 61 31.3
No 134 68.7
Type of complications
Metabolic 6 3.1
Cardiovascular 21 10.8
Bleeding 18 9.2
Infection 6 3.1
Pulmonary 12 6.2
Renal 2 1
Post-operative arrhythmias 8 4.1
Length of ICU stay
≤2 days 92 47.2
>2 days 103 52.8
Outcome
Alive 187 95.9
In-hospital Death 8 4.1

Prolonged ICU stay (>2 days) was observed in 103 (52.8%). There were 8 in-hospital deaths (4.1%). Patients with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times >120 min were more likely to have prolonged ICU stays than those with shorter durations (64/123 [52.3%] vs 25/72 [35.1%], p = 0.049; Figure 2).

Figure 2. Distribution of prolonged and non-prolonged ICU stay by CPB time group.

Figure 2.

Factors associated with complications

Unadjusted associations between selected variables and the occurrence of any postoperative complication are presented in Table 4. Complication rates differed significantly by age group (p = 0.008), with the highest proportions in patients aged 0–16 years (OR 2.41, 95% CI [1.14–5.10] vs >45 years) and 17-30 years (OR 4.54, 95% CI [1.32–15.64]). Sex was not significantly associated with complications (OR 1.37; 95% CI [0.74–2.53]; p = 0.95). Diagnosis type was significantly associated (p = 0.015), with the highest unadjusted OR in coronary artery disease (OR 5.92, 95% CI [1.98–17.67] vs acyanotic anomalies). Procedure type was also associated (p = 0.037); CABG (OR 7.22, 95% CI [2.25–23.1]) and palliative surgery (OR 6.67, 95% CI [1.22–36.7]) carried the highest unadjusted odds relative to patch closure.

Table 4. Univariate associations (unadjusted odds ratio) between potential predictors and cardiopulmonary complications and selected variables among patients who underwent open heart surgery.

Variable Category Complications Yes n (%) No n (%) OR (95% CI) pvalue
Sex Female 24 (39.3%) 63 (47.0%) 1.37 (0.74 –2.53) 0.947
Male 37 (60.7%) 71 (53.0%) —(Reference)
Age (years) 0–16 26 (42.6%) 76 (56.7%) 2.41 (1.14 –5.10) 0.008
17–30 4 (6.6%) 22 (16.4%) 4.54 (1.32 –15.64)
31–45 12 (19.7%) 13 (9.7%) 0.90 (0.33 –2.41)
>45 19 (31.1%) 23 (17.2%) —
Transfusion Yes 78 (64.5%) 43 (35.5%) 1.72 (0.90 –3.25) 0.101
No 56 (75.7%) 18 (24.3%) —
Diagnosis Acyanotic & valvular 3 (60.0%) 2 (40.0%) 2.73 (0.40 –18.55) 0.015
Acyanotic anomalies 41 (80.4%) 10 (19.6%) —
Coronary heart disease 9 (40.9%) 13 (59.1%) 5.92 (1.98 –17.67)
Cyanotic & valvular 0 (0%) 1 (100%) NA
Cyanotic anomalies 21 (61.8%) 13 (38.2%) 2.54 (0.95 –6.75)
Valvular heart disease 58 (70.7%) 24 (29.3%) 1.70 (0.73 –3.94)
Procedure Reconstruction surgery 0 (0%) 1 (100%) NA 0.037
CABG 9 (40.9%) 13 (59.1%) 7.22 (2.25 –23.1)
Combined 12 (66.7%) 6 (33.3%) 2.50 (0.70 –8.93)
Palliative surgery 3 (42.9%) 4 (57.1%) 6.67 (1.22 –36.7)
Patch closure 35 (83.3%) 7 (16.7%) —
PDA ligation 2 (100%) 0 (0%) NA
TAPVR correction 1 (100%) 0 (0%) NA
CPB time (mins) 0–60 6 (54.5%) 5 (45.5%) 2.56 (0.68 –9.58) 0.009
61–120 46 (75.4%) 15 (24.6%) —
121–180 55 (77.5%) 16 (22.5%) 0.89 (0.40 –2.01)
>180 27 (51.9%) 25 (48.1%) 2.84 (1.27 –6.30)
Cross-clamp time (mins) 0–60 29 (72.5%) 11 (27.5%) — 0.001
61–120 78 (78.0%) 11 (11.0%) 0.37 (0.15 –0.95)
121–180 21 (55.3%) 17 (44.7%) 2.13 (0.83 –5.48)
>180 6 (35.3%) 11 (64.7%) 4.83 (1.42 –16.3)
ICU stay ≤2 days 78 (84.8%) 14 (15.2%) — 0.001
>2 days 56 (54.4%) 47 (45.6%) 4.67 (2.34 –9.31)

Notes.

OR
odds ratio
CI
confidence interval
CABG
coronary artery bypass grafting
CPB
cardiopulmonary bypass
ICU
intensive care unit
ref
reference category
*

Statistically significant at p < 0.05. All ORs are unadjusted (univariate).

Longer CPB duration was linked to higher complication rates (p = 0.009). Compared with 61-120) 61–120 min, procedures lasting >180 min carried more than double the unadjusted odds of complication (OR 2.84, 95% CI [1.27–6.30]).Longer aortic cross-clamp times were similarly associated (p < 0.001), with those exceeding 180 min having an OR of 4.83 (95% CI [1.42–16.3]) compared to the <60 min reference group. Blood transfusion was associated with higher complication rates (35.5% vs 24.3%), although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.10).

Pertaining subtype of complications, cardiovascular (p = 0.035), bleeding (p = 0.048), and renal (p = 0.032) complications were significantly associated with longer CPB durations, whereas metabolic, infectious, pulmonary, and arrhythmic complications were not (Table 5).

Table 5. Associations between type of complications, outcome and CPB time among patients who underwent open heart surgery.

Complication CPB time(minutes) P-value
≤60 n (%) 61–120n (%) 121–180 n (%) >180 n (%)
Metabolic abnormalities 0 (0.0%) 2 (33.3%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (33.3%) 0.924
Cardiovascular complications 0 (0.0%) 5 (23.8%) 5 (23.8%) 11 (52.4%) 0.035
Bleeding 2 (11.1%) 4 (22.2%) 5 (27.8%) 7 (38.9%) 0.048
Infection 0 (0.0%) 3 (50.0%) 1 (16.7%) 2 (33.3%) 0.613
Pulmonary complication 0 (0.0%) 4 (33.3%) 2 (25.0%) 5 (41.7%) 0.517
Renal complication 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (100%) 0.032
Postoperative arrhythmias 2 (25.0%) 2 (25.0%) 1 (12.5%) 3 (37.5%) 0.062

Notes.

CPB
cardiopulmonary bypass
*

Statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Discussion

In this cohort from a Tanzanian tertiary-care centre, one-third of patients undergoing open-heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) developed a major postoperative complication. Cardiovascular, bleeding, and pulmonary events were the most frequent. Prolonged CPB and aortic cross-clamp times, younger age, and certain diagnostic categories were significantly associated with these outcomes on univariate analysis, which in turn contributed to longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays.

The complication rate observed (31.3%) is lower than the 50–70% reported in several low- and middle-income country series, such as the 70.2% in an Indian cohort12 and lies within the lower range reported in contemporary high-income settings (20–40%)1,13. The in-hospital mortality rate (4.1%) is between the 2.2% reported in the STS Adult Cardiac Database and the 9.9% seen in a Jordanian study14,15. This comparatively favourable profile may reflect selective referral of less complex cases, younger patient age, and lower comorbidity burden, particularly from rheumatic heart disease16, as well as possible under-recognition of subclinical complications in the absence of advanced post operative diagnostic monitoring of complications.

Male sex was associated with a non-significantly higher complication risk (OR 1.37), consistent in direction with Patra et al., who reported a 1.8-fold increase in males after CPB12. Males may be more prone to ischaemia–reperfusion injury, coagulation abnormalities, and myocardial stress. While females have been reported to experience more systemic inflammatory responses17. These findings highlight the complex, multifactorial mechanisms potentially driving sex differences in postoperative outcomes, though no statistically significant association was observed in this study.

Cardiovascular complications occurred in roughly one in nine patients and were strongly linked to prolonged CPB, consistent with mechanisms involving ischaemia–reperfusion injury, systemic inflammation, and microvascular dysfunction2,4,6. Rates were comparable to those reported in China (13.5–42.5%) [18] and the UK (20–25%)4. Renal complications were rare (1%) compared with 7.8–30% reported elsewhere18,19, which may reflect genuine baseline differences as well as limited perioperative creatinine monitoring.

Longer CPB and cross-clamp times were associated with higher odds of cardiovascular, bleeding, and renal complications, in keeping with evidence linking durations over 180 min with multi-organ dysfunction19–21. Mechanistically, prolonged extracorporeal circulation may trigger inflammatory cascades, disrupts autoregulation, and increases endothelial permeability. In contrast, we found no significant association between CPB time and pulmonary or metabolic complications, diverging from previous reports22. This may be due to limited statistical power or differences in intraoperative ventilatory management.

More than half of the patients had an ICU stay exceeding two days, a proportion higher than the 24–26% reported elsewhere23–25. Prolonged ICU stays may indicate a higher complication burden in this cohort, or may reflect resource and capacity constraints that delayed safe discharge despite clinical improvement. The association between prolonged ICU stay and increased complications mirrors findings by Nissinen et al.5 and Salis et al.19, underscoring the operational impact of prolonged CPB in resource-limited settings.

Several strategies may be associated with reduced CPB-related complications. Tranexamic acid is associated with reduced bleeding but carries a dose-dependent risk of postoperative seizures, limiting its broad applicability26. While plasma, prothrombin complex concentrates, and bypass agents may reduce coagulopathy, robust evidence in resource-limited settings remains scarce27,28. Strategies such as blood conservation protocols, refined myocardial protection, and miniaturized CPB circuits show promise but demand significant investment and infrastructure29,30. In the present context, reducing CPB and cross-clamp times through targeted surgical training and streamlined workflows appears the most practical approach.

Limitations

This study has several important limitations. First, the retrospective design limited the completeness of complication capture, particularly for subclinical events. Second, the number of outcome events (n = 61) was insufficient to support robust multivariable logistic regression analysis; consequently, all reported associations are unadjusted and confounding between predictor variables cannot be excluded. For example, more complex procedures tend to have longer CPB and cross-clamp times, meaning these factors are not independent in practice. Third, the small number of specific complication types (e.g., 2 renal events) limits the reliability of subgroup analyses. Fourth, absence of advanced postoperative monitoring may have led to underestimation of renal, metabolic, and neurological complications. These findings should therefore be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than definitively establishing independent predictors of complications.

Conclusion

Based on the findings of this observational study, CPB and cross-clamp duration were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications and prolonged ICU stay. Efforts to reduce these durations and to optimise perioperative care may contribute to improved outcomes, and are particularly relevant in resource-limited settings where prolonged recovery affects institutional capacity. These findings should be interpreted within the context of a univariate, retrospective analysis. Further prospective multicenter studies with standardized protocols and registries are needed to improve benchmarking, guide quality improvement, and support resource allocation tailored to this context.

Funding Sources

No external funding was received

Declaration Of Competing Interests

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions

A.D.L.: Conceptualization, Methodology; Data Curation, Writing- Original draft preparation

E.R.L.: Methodology, Supervision, Writing- Reviewing and Editing.

S.F.G.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing- Reviewing and Editing.

Data Availability Statement

All data requests should be submitted to the corresponding author for consideration; access to anonymised data may be granted following review.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the surgical, anaesthesia, and ICU teams at Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute and the Institute’s management for their permission and support.

References

  • 1.Ball L, Costantino F, Pelosi P. Postoperative complications of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2016;22(4):386–392. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000319. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kurusz M. Early techniques of extracorporeal circulation. Perfusion. 2003;18(3):191–200. doi: 10.1191/0267659103pf665oa. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wikkelsø A, Wetterslev J, Møller AM, Afshari A. Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor haemostatic treatment versus usual care in adults or children with bleeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;8:CD007871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007871.pub3. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murphy GJ, Angelini GD. Side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass: what is the reality? J Card Surg. 2004;19(6):481–488. doi: 10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04101.x. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nissinen J, Biancari F, Wistbacka JO, Peltola T, Loponen P, Tarkiainen P, Virkkila M, Tarkka M. Safe time limits of aortic cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 2009;24(5):297–305. doi: 10.1177/0267659109354656. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Punjabi PP, Taylor KM. The science and practice of cardiopulmonary bypass: from cross circulation to ECMO and SIRS. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2013;2013(3):249–260. doi: 10.5339/gcsp.2013.32. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Conlon PJ, Stafford-Smith M, White WD, Newman MF, King S, Winn MP, Landolfo K. Acute renal failure following cardiac surgery. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation. 1999;14(5):1158–1162. doi: 10.1093/ndt/14.5.1158. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yankah C, Fynn-Thompson F, Antunes M, Edwin F, Yuko-Jowi C, Mendis S, Thameur H, Urban A, Bolman R. Cardiac surgery capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: quo vadis? Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon. 2014;62(5):393–401. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383723. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hessel 2nd EA. History of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015;29(2):99–111. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.04.006. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mojcik CF, Levy JH. Aprotinin and the systemic inflammatory response after cardiopulmonary bypass. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2001;71(2):745–754. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02218-9. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shann KG, Likosky DS, Murkin JM, Baker RA, Baribeau YR, De Foe GR, Dickinson TA, Gardner TJ, Grocott HP, O’Connor GT, Rosinski DJ, Sellke FW, Willcox TW. An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: a focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2006;132(2):283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.027. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patra C, Chamaiah Gatti P, Panigrahi A. Morbidity after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass and associated factors: a retrospective observational study. Indian Heart Journal. 2019;71(4):350–355. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2019.07.004. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Williamitis C. Dissertation. 2021. Complications in Cardiac Surgery. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chan PG, Seese L, Aranda-Michel E, Gleason TG, Navid F, Chu D, Kliner D, Mulukutla S, Seymour CW, Subramaniam K, Thoma F, Sultan I. Operative mortality in adult cardiac surgery: is the currently utilized definition justified? J Thorac Dis. 2021;13(10):5582–5591. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2213. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hayel A, Wael A, Abdullah Ibrahim A, Abuamereh HA, Alatoum LM, Ashraf Fadel M. Impact of duration of cardiopulmonary bypass on recovery after open heart surgery. Int J Adv Med. 2024;11(3):185–188. doi: 10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20240922. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mebrahtom G, Hailay A, Aberhe W, Zereabruk K, Haile T. Rheumatic heart disease in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Rheumatol. 2023:8834443. doi: 10.1155/2023/8834443. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Squiccimarro E, Lorusso R, Margari V, Labriola C, Whitlock R, Paparella D. Sex-related differences in systemic inflammatory response and outcomes after cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025;40(3) doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf066. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bove T, Calabrò MG, Landoni G, Aletti G, Marino G, Crescenzi G, Rosica C, Zangrillo A. The incidence and risk of acute renal failure after cardiac surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2004;18(4):442–445. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.05.021. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Salis S, Mazzanti VV, Merli G, Salvi L, Tedesco CC, Veglia F, Sisillo E. Cardiopulmonary bypass duration is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2008;22(6):814–822. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.08.004. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mangano CM, Diamondstone LS, Ramsay JG, Aggarwal A, Herskowitz A, Mangano DT. Renal dysfunction after myocardial revascularization: risk factors, adverse outcomes, and hospital resource utilization. The Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1998;128(3):194–203. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-3-199802010-00005. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Canver CC, Chanda J. Intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for respiratory failure after coronary bypass. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2003;75(3):853–858. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04493-4. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Naveed A, Azam H, Murtaza HG, Ahmad RA, Baig MAR. Incidence and risk factors of pulmonary complications after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(4):993–996. doi: 10.12669/pjms.334.12846. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Silberman S, Bitran D, Fink D, Tauber R, Merin O. Very prolonged stay in the intensive care unit after cardiac operations: early results and late survival. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2013;96(1):15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.103. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Naik R, George G, Karuppiah S, Philip MA. Hyperlactatemia in patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass: causative factors and its effect on surgical outcome. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016;19(4):668–675. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.191579. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Martin DP, Gomez D, Tobias JD, Schechter W, Cusi C, Michler R. Severe hyperkalemia during cardiopulmonary bypass: etiology and effective therapy. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2013;4(2):197–200. doi: 10.1177/2150135112467213. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Myles PS, Smith JA, Forbes A, Silbert B, Jayarajah M, Painter T, Cooper DJ, Marasco S, McNeil J, Bussières JS, McGuinness S, Byrne K, Chan MTV, Landoni G, Wallace S. Tranexamic acid in patients undergoing coronary-artery surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;376(2):136–148. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606424. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hayes K, Fernando MC, Jordan V. Prothrombin complex concentrate in cardiac surgery for the treatment of coagulopathic bleeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022;11(11):CD013551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013551.pub2. doi: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fitzgerald J, McMonnies R, Sharkey A, Gross PL, Karkouti K. Thrombin generation and bleeding in cardiac surgery: a clinical narrative review. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2020;67(6):746–753. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01609-4. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huang R, Han J, Wang W, Liu Y, Xie L, Wang X, Chen J, Zhao Q, Zhou X, Yu C, Liu H, Fang Z, Kang Y, Gao C, Zhu R, Chen W, Sun Y, Zhu J, Zhu Z, Luo X, Ma X. Expert consensus on perioperative inflammation management in cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass. J Emerg Crit Care Med. 2025;9:8. doi: 10.21037/jeccm-2024-213. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ismail A, Semien G, Sharma S, Collier SA, Miskolczi SY. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL: 2025. Cardiopulmonary bypass. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data requests should be submitted to the corresponding author for consideration; access to anonymised data may be granted following review.


Articles from Global Cardiology Science & Practice are provided here courtesy of Magdi Yacoub Institute

RESOURCES