Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 May 24.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 May 8;11(7):1415–1435. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2025.03.004

Calcium Homeostatic Feedback Control Predicts Atrial Fibrillation Initiation, Remodeling, and Progression

Nicolae Moise a,b, Seth H Weinberg a,b
PMCID: PMC13197857  NIHMSID: NIHMS2172419  PMID: 40338780

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a progressive disorder, with arrhythmia episodes becoming increasingly longer and ultimately permanent. The chaotic electrical activity by itself is well known to drive progression, a process classically summarized as “AF begets AF.” However, the mechanisms underlying this progression are not yet well defined.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesize that calcium homeostatic feedback regulating ion channel expression is a critical mechanistic component of this pathological process.

METHODS

We propose a modeling framework that tracks both short-term beat-to-beat electrical and calcium activity and long-term tissue substrate remodeling as a single coupled dynamical system. Importantly, the full AF progression from healthy to pathological remodeled tissue is reproduced, in contrast with prior studies that consider “snapshots” of various AF stages.

RESULTS

Simulations predict that single cells respond to fast pacing by maintaining intracellular calcium concentrations through dynamic ion channel expression and electrical phenotype changes. In 2-dimensional homogeneous tissue, spontaneous spiral waves stabilize into permanent re-entry. In 2-dimensional heterogeneous tissue, we observe the initiation of re-entrant activity in response to fast pacing, followed by increasingly longer intermittent, and then permanent, arrhythmic activity. Simulations predict critical properties of re-entrant wave locations, leading to a novel hypothesis: spiral wave activity itself drives underlying substrate remodeling and the emergence of remodeled tissue “niches” that support the stabilization of fast re-entrant activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, the model joins multiple lines of inquiry (ie, long-term calcium regulation, ion channel coexpression and remodeling, and tissue-scale arrhythmia spatiotemporal organization) into a single coherent framework, and for the first time, captures the dynamics of the long-term natural history of AF.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation, calcium homeostasis, computational model, ion channel, remodeling

CENTRAL ILLUSTRATION

graphic file with name nihms-2172419-f0007.jpg

Long Term Progression of Atrial Fibrillation in a Heterogeneous Atrial Tissue

(A) Pseudo-ECG of tissue voltage activity. (B) Atrial fibrillation (AF) interval duration increases over time. (C) The number of spiral wave tips present in the atrial tissue. (D) electrical remodeling. Note that electrical remodeling is represented by ICaL conductance (γCaL) as all conductances remain correlated during changes (cf. Figure 1A). (E) Intercellular coupling (γD) remodeling. (F) Heterogeneous Catgt spatial distribution. (G, H) Spiral tip density in the first and last third of the simulation, respectively. (I) Snapshots of voltage, Cai, γCaL, and γD for at time periods corresponding to chaotic electrical dynamics. Black and white lines show spiral tip position shortly before and after each snapshot. Insets shows remodeling niche underlying the stable spiral location. ECG = electrocardiogram.


Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and the leading cause of stroke, causing significant morbidity and mortality.1 AF is characterized by continuous, chaotic electrical waves that prevent regular atrial activation and contractile function. AF is noteworthy for its natural history: sporadic, self-terminating episodes of disordered activity (known as paroxysmal AF) become more and more frequent, ultimately leading to a state of continuous chaotic activity, or permanent AF.

In a process that has been summarized succinctly as “AF begets AF,”2 the electrical activity itself directly causes changes in the underlying atrial tissue substrate. Specifically, rapid electrical activity drives electrical remodeling: decreased inward sodium current (INa) and calcium current (ICaL) and increased inward-rectifier potassium current (IK1) and sodium-calcium exchanger (INCX) among the most critical effects.3 These changes in ion channel expression collectively determine a shorter atrial action potential duration (APD), which in turn increase the likelihood of re-entrant electrical activity. Longer-lasting (chronic) AF further leads to structural remodeling consisting of heterogeneous gap junction coupling and fibrosis, which in turn slow conduction and amplify the proarrhythmic effects of electrical remodeling.4,5

Critically, all of these changes lead to greater likelihood of AF initiation and persistence, thus creating a vicious cycle. However, due to the intrinsically long timescales associated with this cycle, studies almost exclusively focus on the beginning and the end of this process, comparing properties of healthy atrial tissue with tissue following AF-associated remodeling. Computational studies similarly simulate these binary conditions based on either healthy or AF-associated model parameters. The goal of this study is to reproduce and understand the dynamics, not just the endpoint, of the progressive nature of AF, which is inherently a spatiotemporally complex process that depends on the coupled history and organization of arrhythmic events and dynamic atrial tissue remodeling.

Regulation of ion channel expression has been extensively studied in excitable cell systems, such as the neuron. O’Leary et al6 proposed an elegant mathematical model, in which neuronal ion channel expression levels are governed by a feedback system maintaining a particular homeostatic intracellular calcium (Cai) “set point” or “target” (Catgt) and correlations between the different channels, thus ensuring physiological cellular electrical characteristics. We recently adapted this feedback model to describe the initiation of pacemaking activity in the sinoatrial node in the heart.7 Importantly, we identified that, while ion channels are intrinsically regulated within an individual myocyte, electrical activity mediates interactions between myocytes (ie, tissue-scale dynamics), thus producing emergent patterns for the spatial organization of pacemaking activity. Critically, the feedback model captures the inherent multiple timescales of these processes: millisecond-to-second scale dynamics of ion channel gating and fluxes and hours-to-days scale dynamics of ion channel expression remodeling.

We hypothesize that the same theoretical framework can be expanded to explain the initiation and progression of AF in atrial tissue. The 2 key properties of the feedback system described previously, correlated ion channel expression and dynamic expression regulated by Cai, are also found in the heart. First, ion channels are expressed in a coordinated way in the heart8: it has been shown that Kir2.1 and Nav1.5 proteins reciprocally increase each other’s expression9 and are trafficked together to the cell membrane.10 Further, a number of channel messenger RNAs (mRNAs) (CACNA1C, SCN5A, KCNQ1, hERG1a) are colocalized and cotranscribed.11 These mechanisms lead to a balance of depolarizing and repolarizing currents,12 which has also been demonstrated computationally by optimizing for “good enough solutions” that match APD and calcium transient (CaT) characteristics.13 Second, rapid pacing is well known to drive changes in ion channel expression characteristic of AF, and there is abundant evidence that calcium, and specifically pacing-induced Cai overload, is the main driver.5 AF-associated changes ultimately converge on reducing CaT amplitude, as well as on reduced APD, and thus decrease average Cai. Notably, blocking excessive Cai entry using calcium channel blockers can prevent remodeling.14,15 Finally, remodeling induced by pacing occurs in a variety of species (eg, goat, sheep, dog, horse)2,16–18 and across cell types (eg, cardiac induced pluripotent stem cells, isolated atrial and ventricular cells),19–21 suggesting that this mechanism is a general homeostatic response to calcium overload.

Here, we are interested in answering the question, how does AF initiate and progress? Current computational efforts have focused on increasingly more spatial detail, from whole atria models22 to subcellular structures.23 However, the study of the progression of AF (identified as a standing open problem)22 necessarily requires a greatly expanded timescale that has thus far not been realized. To address this, we couple an established model of atrial electro-physiology,24 with our proposed model of dynamic control of ion channel expression and intercellular coupling based on Cai feedback. The new model opens up the study of cardiac activity across multiple timescales, from beat-to-beat dynamics to the slow progression of substrate changes and AF progression, paralleling developments in the long-term study of neuronal homeostasis and plasticity,25 the development of historical structures,26 or more generally of multiple timescale processes in adaptive networks.27

We find that the single atrial myocyte responds dynamically to increased pacing rates, remodeling ion channel expression and reproducing the characteristic cellular scale changes in APD and CaT morphology well established in AF. At the tissue scale, while the nonremodeled healthy baseline atrial tissue is resistant to re-entrant electrical activity, continuous rapid pacing leads to tissue remodeling and thus to the stabilization of re-entrant waves. Critically, we find that fast pacing in a heterogeneous tissue qualitatively replicates the natural history of AF: Pacing induces an initial substrate remodeling, followed by spontaneous re-entry. This paroxysmal AF induces further remodeling, which transforms the intermittent arrhythmic activity into persistent chaotic activity, or permanent AF. Throughout this process, we track the characteristic long-term organization of AF,28 observing an increase in AF episode duration and re-entrant wave locations and their spatial stabilization. Overall, we propose a novel theoretical framework that necessarily ties together multiple interrelated processes (ion channel coregulation, calcium homeostasis, AF natural history), demonstrating the first in silico investigation of the entire progression (ie, initiation to remodeling to stabilization) of AF.

METHODS

ATRIAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY AND CALCIUM FEEDBACK REGULATION MODEL.

We simulate individual atrial myocyte electrical dynamics using an established human atrial model of ionic currents and Cai cycling.24 To represent long-term electrical remodeling, we couple the atrial electrical and Cai model with a Cai regulatory feedback model governing ionic current expression, originally proposed for neurons6 and recently used by us to probe long-term emergent behavior in the sinoatrial node in the heart.7 Thus, in this coupled system, on the short-term (milliseconds to seconds) timescale, atrial transmembrane potential (V) is governed by voltage (V)- and Cai-dependent ionic currents I, while calcium currents and fluxes govern Cai.24 On the long-term (minutes to hours/days) timescale, ionic conductances (which mediate ionic currents and fluxes) are governed by the Cai feedback model.

In brief, the fundamental mechanism underlying the Cai regulatory feedback model is that individual myocytes regulate ion channel expression to “match” an inherent intracellular calcium target level (Catgt) to maintain Cai homeostasis. The feedback model is formulated as

τxdmxdt=Catgt−Cai, (1)
τγdγxdt=mx−γx, (2)

where Catgt is the homeostatic calcium target, Cai is the intracellular calcium concentration, mx represents a relative (normalized) mRNA expression compared with baseline, and γx is a scaling factor for ionic conductances gx, for each of the x ionic currents I and fluxes J coupled to the feedback system, which are those with significant changes (ie, mRNA, protein expression or current density) in AF remodeling (INa, ICaL, Ito, IKur, IK1, IKs, INCX, JRyR,leak, JSERCA).3 Notably, time constants τx and τγ determine the timescale of the response to Cai changes.

We simulate a 2-dimensional atrial tissue by electrically coupling individual atrial myocytes, represented by the standard monodomain partial differential equation formulation, with diffusion coefficient D governing cell-cell electrical coupling. We choose a spatial discretization step of Δx = 0:125 cm, corresponding to the average size of a human atrial myocyte.29 The largest tissue size we simulate (1,024 × 1,024 cells or 12:8 × 12:8 cm) is equivalent to the total area of both atria.30 To represent long-term intercellular coupling remodeling (reduced gap junctional coupling, fibrosis) in AF, D is also scaled by γD, which similarly obeys equations 1 and 2. Importantly, note that in tissue, each cell has a local Catgt and its own set of γx (for all conductances and diffusion), coupled to the local Cai, such that all γx vary in space, in addition to time.

In the healthy state (ie, absence of remodeling), γx = 1 for all of currents, fluxes, and intercellular coupling. While τγ is equal for all ionic conductances (approximately representing the timescale of protein translation), crucially, τx is unique for each conductance, thus defining their individual dynamic response to changes in Cai. We derive the τx values from the healthy and chronic AF values based on measured AF electrical remodeling changes (see Table 5 in Grandi et al),3 as shown in detail in the Supplemental Appendix. Importantly, noting that intercellular coupling remodeling occurs on an approximately 1,000-fold slower timescale than electrical remodeling,31 τD, the time constant for γD in equation 1, is 3 orders of magnitude larger compared with the time constants for ionic currents and fluxes. Further, we choose the baseline Catgt of 258 nM, to be equivalent to the time-averaged Cai in the atrial cell model paced at 60 beats/min (1,000 ms cycle length), thus defining the baseline homeostatic state. In heterogeneous tissue simulations, we vary Catgt on an interval of 200 to 320 nM, assuming approximately 20% tissue heterogeneity in the healthy atria.

Finally, we note that simulating the long-term changes associated with AF remodeling poses a significant computational challenge. To solve this system efficiently, we developed a CUDA-based model implementation to utilize state-of-the-art GPU hardware available through the Ohio Supercomputer Center32 and the Delta cluster at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications, through an National Science Foundation Access allocation.33 The GPU formulation takes advantage of the massively parallel nature of the system and enabled investigation of continuous electrical activity in a large tissue for more than 24 hours of simulated time—to our knowledge, the longest cardiac electrophysiology simulations performed thus far.

A complete description of the model formulation, parameter derivation, tissue pacing protocols, spiral wave tracking, action potential (AP) characterization, heterogeneous Catgt maps, and numerical methods is provided in the Supplemental Appendix.

Note that no additional ethical/Institutional Review Board approval was required for this study, as this study is fully computational. All data were generated from numerical simulations, and no human subject or animal data were generated or experiments performed for the study.

RESULTS

AF REMODELING FOLLOWING RAPID PACING IN A SINGLE ATRIAL MYOCYTE.

We first investigated the behavior of a single atrial cell coupled to the feedback model. Individual cell ion channel conductances remodeled in response to long-term pacing at different cycle lengths (Figure 1A). At a cycle length of 1,000 ms (60 beats/min), the average resting heart rate in humans, all conductance scaling factors (γx) remained close to their nominal value of 1, consistent with homeostasis (ie, Catgt = 258 nM) corresponding to baseline channel expression. In response to faster pacing (ie, shorter cycle length), mx was modified (see Supplemental Figure 1), driving changes in conductances γx, following equations 1 and 2, which thus dynamically adapted and reached a new steady state. Note that some conductances increased (γNCX, γRyRleak, γKs, γK1), while others decreased (γNa, γSERCA, γito, γCaL, γKur), based on their respective up- or downregulation during AF remodeling (described further in the Supplemental Methods). Importantly, the long-term conductance dynamics are driven by Cai (Figure 1B): faster pacing initially increases the Cai average (solid black curve) above the cell’s inherent Catgt (dashed black line), thus driving the remodeling (ie, change in conductance scaling factors) via the feedback model. This subsequent remodeling ultimately leads to a decrease in the average Cai, until the time average reaches Catgt, thus maintaining homeostasis. Progressively faster pacing leads to progressively greater remodeling; notably, the steady-state following pacing at the fastest cycle length of 250 ms leads to conductances near levels in chronic AF (see Supplemental Table 1). The remodeling process is also reversible: the scaling factors return to their original value of 1 following a return to pacing at 1,000 ms.

FIGURE 1. Electrical Remodeling in Individual Atrial Myocytes.

FIGURE 1

(A) Progressive electrical remodeling of ionic currents and fluxes (different color lines) in response to progressively faster pacing (shorter cycle lengths). Conductances are at baseline (γx ≈1) for pacing at 60 beats/min (cycle length of 1,000 ms). (B) Calcium transients (CaTs) (red) and moving average intracellular calcium (Cai) (black) illustrate the impact of remodeling to a maintain a homeostatic Cai level (calcium target, dashed horizontal line) at different cycle lengths. (C) Electrical remodeling, following pacing at different cycle lengths, alters action potential duration (APD) restitution. (D) Electrical remodeling following 250-ms pacing (dotted line) results in shorter action potentials and altered CaTs compared with the healthy state (solid line) (calcium target, dashed horizontal line). (E) For all currents and fluxes (different color lines), steady-state remodeling at different cycle lengths (symbols) maintains a linear relationship between conductances, described by equation 1.

We measured the characteristics of APs and CaTs following progressive remodeling (ie, the steady state for progressively faster cycle lengths). Notably, progressive remodeling led to the characteristic electrical changes found in chronic AF: a flattening of the APD restitution curve (Figure 1C), shortened APD, lower resting membrane potential, and reduced CaT amplitude (Figure 1D). Reduced CaTs are a crucial result of the feedback system: faster pacing intrinsically elevated Cai, such that remodeling necessarily reduced the CaTs to maintain long-term Cai homeostasis toward Catgt (dashed black line). Additionally, while the overall dynamics were similar, the specific Catgt level altered the steady-state conductances at the different cycle lengths (Supplemental Figures 2 to 4), with lower Catgt leading to more remodeling and vice versa. Notably, higher Catgt resulted in a steeper APD restitution curve in response to remodeling at all long-term pacing rates (Supplemental Figure 4).

Figure 1E illustrates channel conductances relative to the reference γCaL, with the markers denoting the steady-state values, highlighting their respective linear relation maintained throughout remodeling. Notably, this illustrates that for any γCaL value, there is a corresponding set of all other conductances, uniquely defined by the linear relationship. Therefore, for simplicity, in the subsequent tissue simulations, we presented a single scaling factor (γCaL), recognizing that all other conductances would be either proportional (if similarly down-regulated as γCaL) or inversely proportional (if up-regulated). We note that the relative relationship between the conductances was determined by the τx values derived from experimental data, as explained in the Supplemental Methods. Further, it is notable that while the τx values defined the direction and relative magnitude of conductance changes, they did not impose the steady state at a given cycle length. Therefore, it is an emergent property that the steady-state following rapid pacing of 250 ms was remarkably close to the remodeling observed in chronic AF.

Additionally, we demonstrate that the model was robust to variation both in the τx values (Supplemental Figure 5), in which random τx values corresponded to random slopes for the linear relationships shown in Figure 1E, and in the γx initial conditions (Supplemental Figure 6). Importantly, the feedback model enabled adequate response to fast pacing, inducing steady-state AP and CaT morphology that was generally consistent with AF remodeling. Overall, the single-cell model captured key dynamics of electrical remodeling in AF: the ion conductance responses to rapid pacing, subsequent changes in AP and CaT properties, and reversibility. Variants of the regulatory feedback model in a single cell are also noted further in the Discussion (Supplemental Figure 7).

PROGRESSIVE AF REMODELING IN HOMOGENEOUS ATRIAL TISSUE.

We next investigated the behavior of re-entrant activity in a 2-dimensional atrial tissue, initially considering a homogeneous tissue (Figure 2, Supplemental Figure 8), in which all cells had identical Catgt = 258 nM, as in the previous single-cell simulations. We applied a protocol designed to investigate the effect of long-term re-entrant activity in tissue and specifically the interaction between that activity and remodeling: the tissue is first rapidly paced (10 seconds at 100-ms cycle length) to drive remodeling. Then, we induced a spiral wave by cross-stimulation and tracked the persistence of re-entrant activity over time. If electrical activity was extinguished (ie, the spiral wave self-terminates), we restarted pacing followed by cross-field stimulation (see the Supplemental Methods for complete protocol details).

FIGURE 2. Spiral Wave Stabilization in a Homogeneous Atrial Tissue.

FIGURE 2

The size of the tissue corresponds to 512 × 512 cells. (A) The trajectory of the spiral tip over the first simulation hour illustrates stabilization after the first approximately 1,000 seconds. (B, C) Snapshots of voltage, Cai, and electrical conductance scaling factor γCaL for (B) stable and (C) unstable spirals. The initially induced spiral wave is unstable, leading to breakups and extinction. As remodeling progresses, the spiral wave stabilizes. (B) Note that the spiral tip follows the electrical remodeling spatial pattern, which was induced by the stable spiral wave (right and inset). Black traces show spiral tip position shortly before and after each snapshot. (D) The position of the spiral tip trajectories (y-axis projection) is initially wide (spanning the entire tissue), with brief pauses (denoting wave breakups) before stabilizing. (E) The pseudo-electrocardiogram of tissue voltage activity similarly indicates periods of unstable and stable spirals. Orange lines denote rapid (100 ms) pacing followed by cross-stimulation. (F) Electrical (γCaL , green lines) remodeling approaches steady-state levels relatively early, compared with the slower intercellular coupling (γD, blue lines) remodeling progression on a longer timescale. Lines denote γCaL and γD at each spatial location in the atrial tissue. Note that, as explained in text, γCaL represents all dynamic conductances. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

The spiral tip trajectory (ie, the position of spiral tip[s] over time) illustrates that during the first hour of simulation, electrical activity transitioned from an unstable pattern, with chaotic rotor tip trajectories and multiple spiral wave, to a single stable spiral wave (Figure 2A). Snapshots of tissue voltage at the end and the start of the first hour (Figures 2B and 2C, left, respectively) illustrate the stable wave pattern that emerges. In addition to the chaotic trajectories, the initially induced re-entrant activity frequently self-terminated, leading to a restart of rapid pacing (see gaps in trajectories in Figure 2D and orange lines [denoting pacing episodes] above the tissue pseudo-electrocardiogram [ECG] in Figure 2E).

Importantly, spiral wave stabilization was driven primarily by the electrical remodeling (Figures 2B, 2C [right], and 2F [green lines]). The initial episodes of fast pacing and the transitory spiral waves induced sufficient tissue remodeling, developing a substrate that could sustain stable activity. Beyond the tipping point for this substrate, a single stable spiral wave formed. The stabilized spiral wave then further rapidly paced the tissue, sustaining the remodeling process until a new steady state was reached.

A surprising emergent result (and prediction) of this tissue simulation is that remodeling was spatially heterogeneous, despite identical cells within the tissue having a single homogeneous Catgt (see Figure 2B, right, inset). Specifically, the region in the atrial tissue corresponding to the location of the stabilized spiral wave tip trajectory is the least remodeled (ie, electrical conductances closest to 1), with a “ring” spatial pattern with reduced remodeling emerging. The formation of this remodeled “niche” is caused by the fact that cells at and near the spiral wave “core” are effectively only partially activated, compared with the rest of the tissue, which induces less remodeling. Also notably, on this timescale, there is minimal remodeling of intercellular coupling (ie, γD remains near 1 throughout the tissue) (Figure 2F, blue lines), demonstrating that this niche formation is driven initially by electrical remodeling.

Simulating beyond the first hour, we found that the location of the spiral wave initially remained consistent (Supplemental Figure 8A, Video 1). However, subsequent intercellular remodeling induced a long-term, slow drift of the spiral wave core (Supplemental Figure 8A). Notably, this pattern is different from other forms of spiral meandering, as the immediate pattern of re-entry remained quasi-stable and only drifted on a very slow timescale. The ring remodeling spatial pattern was initially apparent in the γD map as well, but the pattern became “blurred” by the re-entrant wave drift (Supplemental Figures 8D and 8E, 2 right panels). Further, the overall level of electrical remodeling was maintained (Supplemental Figure 8C, green lines), and the intercellular remodeling also reached a remodeled state during the 24 hours (Supplemental Figure 8C, blue lines). Notably, the changes in the underlying substrate had a complex effect on the spiral trajectory itself, with a transition to a different pattern in the last quarter of the simulation, as evidenced in the spiral tip location y-position projection in panel A, as well as the traces in panels B and C (Supplemental Figure 8).

Different Catgt levels within the homogeneous tissue had a significant influence on long-term tissue level re-entrant behavior. Using the same pacing and cross stimulation protocol, a lower Catgt of 200 nM (Supplemental Figure 9, Video 2) led to more remodeling (lower γCaL, γD), consistent with single-cell behavior (Supplemental Figure 2). Enhanced remodeling shortened APDs in the tissue and resulted in significantly more dynamic, chaotic behavior. Following a shorter period of pacing, 2 spiral waves were induced. As the remodeling progressed, the spirals changed location in the tissue, ultimately leading to a brief pause in re-entrant activity (Supplemental Figure 9B, close to the 16-hour mark). Pacing and cross-field stimulation then induced a single spiral wave that stabilized on the previously remodeled ring pattern of an extinguished re-entrant wave (Supplemental Figure 9F, Video 2).

Conversely, the same protocol applied to a homogeneous tissue with higher Catgt of 320 nM led to less remodeling (Supplemental Figure 10, Video 3), also consistent with single-cell behavior (Supplemental Figure 3). This, in turn, led to the inability of crosswave stimulation to induce stable re-entry. Every induced wave was unstable and quickly extinguished, leading to a restart of the pacing protocol.

To separate the effects of electrical vs intercellular coupling remodeling, we simulated a homogeneous tissue with the baseline Catgt = 258 nM while “clamping” (ie, fixing as a constant) γD to its initial baseline value of 1 (Supplemental Figure 11, Video 4). The overall long-term behavior was comparable to the early activity in the tissue with unclamped γD dynamics (Supplemental Figure 8): initial intermittent re-entry followed by pacing, which then stabilized as a persistent spiral wave. Notably, the spiral wave remains stable, without either long-term drift or breakup. It is interesting to note that γCaL approaches steady-state values before re-entry becomes persistent. These results underline a key model prediction: electrical remodeling is the initial stabilizing factor for re-entry, while the slow intracellular remodeling drives the transition into more complex drifting or chaotic behavior.

AF PROGRESSION IN HETEROGENEOUS ATRIAL TISSUE.

Finally, we investigate the progression of AF in a large, heterogeneous tissue (Figures 3 to 6, Video 7), such that the average Catgt value within the entire tissue was the same as the previous homogeneous tissue (258 nM), while the Catgt value at each spatial location (ie, each atrial cell) had a different value on the interval of 200 to 320 nM (Figure 3E). The tissue was similarly paced at the same 100-ms cycle length (Figure 3F) but without externally inducing the spiral wave through cross-stimulation. Following pacing for a short period (~650 seconds), sufficient remodeling was induced, such that a spiral wave spontaneously formed (Figure 4, Video 5): spatial heterogeneity in Catgt led to heterogeneous remodeling and thus to local conduction block, around which re-entry formed. Initially, re-entry was unstable, leading to frequent spiral wave extinction and a subsequent restart of pacing (Figures 3A and 3B).

FIGURE 3. Long-Term Progression of AF in a Heterogeneous Atrial Tissue.

FIGURE 3

Further details of the same simulation are shown in Figures 4 to 6. The tissue size corresponds to 1024 × 1024 cells. (A) Pseudo-electrocardiogram of tissue voltage activity. Orange lines mark episodes of fast pacing (100 ms). B) Progression of atrial fibrillation (AF) interval duration. Note the log scale on the y-axis. (C) Electrical (γCaL) and (D) intercellular coupling (γD) remodeling dynamics during progression from transient to persistent fibrillatory activity. (E) Spatial map of calcium target (Catgt) in the heterogeneous tissue. (F, G) Examples of electrical activity (time points denoted in the plots above) during an episode of fast pacing and during re-entrant activity.

FIGURE 6. Fibrillatory Activity in Heterogeneous Tissue.

FIGURE 6

(A) Dense spiral tracks during fibrillatory activity. The orange track highlights the stable re-entrant activity in the emergent tissue niche. (B) Chaotic tissue pseudo-electrocardiogram. (C) Snapshot of tissue activity and remodeling state. Points 1, 2, and 3 mark the cell locations highlighted in panel E. (D) Map of average voltage activation frequency, calculated from the 20 seconds of activity shown in panels A and B. The white arrowhead points to the high activation rate spot created by stable spiral wave location, which rapidly paces the local region. (E) Normalized voltage (blue) and calcium (red) activity at the 3 locations. Cell 1 exhibits the most remodeling, with the highest activation frequency and very low calcium activity. Cells 2 and 3 are less remodeled, showing high calcium peaks and longer APDs. Both are activated chaotically and exhibit APD and calcium peak irregular periodicities. Note the dissociation between voltage and calcium, a hallmark characteristic of atrial fibrillation. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

FIGURE 4. The First Episode of Spontaneous Initiation of Re-entry in Heterogeneous Tissue.

FIGURE 4

(A) Spiral tip tracks during the first episode of re-entry. (B) Pseudo-electrocardiogram and pacing episodes. (C, D) Tissue activity and remodeling states during the initiation of re-entry. (C) Pacing in the lower left corner. (D) Re-entry initiation around a remodeling “peak,” which defines a local intracellular calcium (Cai) heterogeneity leading to a temporary local conduction block. Data are also shown in Video 5.

Electrical remodeling in the atrial substrate drove the initial capability for re-entry initiation (Figure 4D), as the early changes in intercellular coupling were minimal (Figure 4E). However, the pacing and the subsequent re-entrant episodes also drove changes in γD (Figure 3D), occurring in parallel with both increasingly longer re-entrant episodes (Figure 3B) and an increasing number of spiral waves that can be sustained in the tissue (Figure 5A). The progression of tissue remodeling further led to an increase in the dominant frequency of tissue voltage activation, as well as to faster and more complex activity (Figures 5B and 5C). Ultimately, re-entrant activity became permanent. The re-entrant waves in turn maintain γCaL and γD at a remodeled steady state, capable of sustaining permanent arrhythmic activity.

FIGURE 5. Increasing Complexity and Organization of AF Over Time.

FIGURE 5

(A) The number of spiral wave tips present in the atrial tissue (with red trace showing moving average). The pacing markers (same as Figure 3A) are overlaid for reference. (B) Increase in the dominant frequency of atrial fibrillation (AF) activity. The vertical dotted line marks the transition to permanent re-entrant activity. The final permanent episode is split into 1,000-second intervals. The red curve represents the moving average of the frequency, increasing over time. Note that the y-axis was chose to clearly delineate the average, such that some data points are outside the plot. (C) Moving average of distance between peaks in the pseudo-electrocardiogram, a measure of fractionation or complexity of activation. (D) Spiral tip density heatmap of each third of the simulation. (E, F) Snapshots of voltage, intracellular calcium (Cai), γCaL , and γD at time periods corresponding to (E) early and (F) late chaotic electrical dynamics. Black and white lines show spiral tip position shortly before and after each snapshot. Insets in panel F illustrate the remodeling pattern underlying the stable spiral location.

Notably, the spatial pattern of spiral wave tips is dynamic, as demonstrated in the heatmaps of spiral wave tip distribution during each third of the simulation in Figure 5D. At both early and late time points within AF progression, the spiral tip density was greatest around the locations of transitions between high and low remodeling (Figures 5E and 5F, 2 right panels for spatial maps of γCaL and γD). As remodeling progressed, spiral waves were present over a larger amount of the tissue. The spiral tip density exhibited exhibits an interesting spatial pattern during the last third of the simulation (Figure 5D, far left): stable re-entrant spirals appeared in the low Catgt areas, with a small re-entry core similar to the simulations in homogeneous tissue (Supplemental Figure 9). This pattern was accompanied by a corresponding positive “bump” in remodeling underlying the wave location (Figure 5F, inset), reminiscent of the pattern that develops in homogeneous tissue. Due to the fast activation of this re-entrant spot, the density of other spiral waves in the nearby transition zone increased (Figure 5D) and further led to an increase in total number of re-entrant waves that the tissue can sustain (Figure 5A). This pattern was not completely stable, and appeared in 2 low Catgt zones, as highlighted in Video 7.

We also investigated the state of the fully remodeled atrial tissue, at the end of the simulation (Figure 6, Video 6). An emerging stable re-entry site was apparent in the location of the spiral tips (Figure 6A, orange line). This led to the emergence of a niche as described previously—note the positive “bump” in the γCaL inset in Figure 6C. This fast localized activity was evident as a small, bright spot in the tissue activation frequency map (Figure 6D, white arrow). The area immediately close to the stable re-entrant focus exhibits the most frequent activation. Notably, throughout the tissue, the electrical activity exhibits multiple frequencies and is highly dissociated from calcium activity, hallmarks of AF. In all cells shown in Figure 6, calcium activity settled in a complex alternating pattern, with large peaks followed by multiple smaller transients, with each spatial location ultimately maintaining their respective Catgt.

Finally, we compared the fully AF remodeled tissue with the corresponding “control” tissue (ie, same Catgt map) that had instead been paced at 1,000 ms (60 beats/min) (Supplemental Figure 12), uncovering significant changes in tissue properties. Throughout the tissue, APD values in the AF remodeled tissue were significantly shorter (Supplemental Figures 13A and 13B), and with a wider normalized distribution (Supplemental Figure 13E). Conduction was also slower and more irregular in the AF tissue (Supplemental Figures 13C and 13D). Ultimately, these changes led to an increased susceptibility of AF tissue to re-entry (Supplemental Figure 14). Notably, while tissue re-entry can be induced in the control tissue, the episodes were brief and self-terminating; in contrast, in AF remodeled tissue, a single pacing episode induces permanent re-entry.

Importantly, the activity described in Figures 3 to 6 is only one out of a number of possible electrical activities and remodeling spatiotemporal patterns: we tested the same pacing protocol on 25 different random Catgt maps (Supplemental Figures 15 and 16), each with the same range of Catgt values but with a different spatial pattern. Note that the case described previously is number 8 out of the 25 (with arbitrary ordering). We found that 3 patterns of activity emerged: 1) no re-entrant activity was induced, and therefore pacing was continuous (6 cases); 2) transitory re-entry followed by pacing (13 cases); and finally 3) persistent re-entrant activity (6 cases). An example of a tissue resistant to re-entry and intermittent re-entry are shown in Videos 9 and 10, corresponding to maps 2 and 3, respectively, and 2 further examples of persistent activity are shown in Videos 8 and 11, corresponding to maps 1 and 5. Thus, a majority of tissues presented with either transient or persistent re-entrant activity, with the exact spatiotemporal pattern determined by the heterogeneous Catgt map. Notably, in the simulations with permanent re-entry shown (Videos 8 and 11), the same distinct spiral density hotspots appear in low Catgt areas, toward the end of the simulation, which also induce a remodeling “bump” pattern as described previously.

DISCUSSION

MODEL ASSUMPTIONS.

We first discuss several critical model assumptions. Figure 1 illustrates the fundamental assumptions and dynamics of the regulatory model, which are imposed at the level of the single atrial cell. First, the regulatory model maintains constant average Cai levels, determined by the Catgt set point, by dynamically adjusting mRNA and thus ion channel expression. As discussed in our previous work,7 the single Catgt is a reduction of a highly complex intracellular regulatory network5 to a single phenomenological set point. There are multiple known mechanisms through which pacing-induced increases in Cai translate to ion channel changes: increased Cai activates calcineurin, a Ca2+-dependent phosphatase, which activates NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells) that suppresses Cav1.2 (channel carrying ICaL) transcription.34 Moreover, NFAT upregulates IK1 mRNA and protein expression by removing translational inhibition35 and further reduces Ito mRNA and protein expression.36 Increased Cai additionally leads to activation of CaMKII, which can decrease sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ uptake and increases ryanodine receptor leak.37 Further, the knockout of transcription factor PITX2 leads to AF-like remodeling in the absence of fast pacing,38 suggesting that it could play a part in setting the sensitivity of the regulatory network to Cai. Taken together, despite their complexity, all these pathways act in concert to reduce average Cai, similar to the results shown in Figure 1B. Thus, the model captures the fundamental behavior of the regulatory network–adjusting ion channel expression to maintain calcium homeostasis.

Other pathways could be targeted by intracellular regulation during AF progression. For example, it has recently been shown that Ca2+ buffers are significantly decreased in chronic AF,39 leading to an increased risk of spontaneous Ca2+ release or arrhythmia initiation. By implementing a similar regulation as utilized to represent ion channel expression, we can reproduce the regulation of Ca2+ buffer concentrations in a single cell (Supplemental Figure 7I, A). However, we find that incorporating this additional regulation results in minimal changes in subsequent ion channel remodeling (Supplemental Figure 7I, B) and AP shape (Supplemental Figure 7I, B, top), with small differences in the CaT shape (Supplemental Figure 7I, B, bottom).

In addition to the overall Cai level, the balance between diastolic and systolic Cai levels is critically important for cardiac contractile function,40 especially given the fast pacing rates that occur in AF. As such, the feedback model can be naturally extended to investigate the influence of regulation during these 2 phases, with 2 Catgt values that alternate in time with the phases of the CaT based on average systolic and diastolic Cai levels (Supplemental Figure 7II, A). Note that all channels follow the 2 alternating Catgt values—imposing 2 targets to different subsets of the channels will lead to an unstable regulatory system.6 Interestingly, the two targets lead to less remodeling at fast pacing (Supplemental Figure 7II, B), which drives significant changes in AP shape compared with the baseline model as well (Supplemental Figure 7II, C, top). Further, the resultant CaT fails to perfectly match either of the 2 targets and instead settles into an intermediate pattern between the two (Supplemental Figure 7II, C, bottom). Collectively, these examples serve to illustrate that the feedback model can b naturally extended to account for more complex intracellular regulation. Furthermore, as discussed subsequently, a model that includes subcellular detail might be necessary to capture the full range of calcium cycling dynamics.

A second important assumption governing single cell dynamics is that as expression changes during remodeling, correlations between channels are maintained (Figure 1E), based on the concept of coexpression and coregulation of ion channel mRNA and protein levels.8–11 However, the direction of the expression changes in AF remodeling at the atrial cellular level can differ from those in healthy and ventricular cells. For example, IKr (carried by hERG1 protein) remains unchanged in AF,3 despite the lower levels of ICaL or INa, with which it is coexpressed.11 Further, more remodeled states (eg, the steady state at 250-ms pacing rate) show increased levels of IKs and IK1, while ICaL is decreased, which reverses the relation shown in healthy ventricular cells, described by Banyasz et al.12 Therefore, this suggests that the specific regulatory pathways involved in AF-induced atrial remodeling are different than those setting the baseline healthy state of ventricular cells, with differences arising potentially in both a disease- and chamber-specific manner. However, it is plausible that similar regulatory mechanisms governing calcium homeostasis (ie, altered transcription, coexpression, and cotranscription) are involved, thus leading to correlated ion channel expression levels, albeit with different relationships between currents adapted specifically to reducing Cai load.

The dynamics of tissue remodeling, shown in Supplemental Figure 8C and Figures 3C and 3D, highlight the 3 distinct timescales in our model: The fastest timescale, on the order of milliseconds, is determined by the beat-to-beat dynamics governing APs and CaTs. The intermediate timescale is determined by electrical remodeling (ie, the dynamics of g) (Figure 3C), set by sg (see Supplemental Methods), and constrained by electrical remodeling occurring significantly slower than the beat-to-beat dynamics. The value of the constant τγ is defined such that the remodeled γ values reach a new steady state in approximately 1 hour (eg, Figure 2F), based on the fastest described changes in electrical properties (eg, effective refractory period).41 Notably, reported timescales vary: other studies show slower changes in these properties, on the order of days.2,42 The slowest timescale governs the intercellular coupling or structural changes (highlighted in Figure 3D), known to occur at an even slower rate than electrical remodeling.43,44 Here, we assume that these changes stabilize over a period of 24 hours, a faster response than that seen in the studies cited previously. However, as shown previously (by us and by Jæger et al),7,45 the separation of timescales is sufficient to capture qualitative behavior in cardiac systems with dynamic substrates. Thus, our timeline of electrical properties and intercellular coupling dynamics, while erring toward the fastest timeline of reported data, is adequate to describe the long-term behavior of cardiac tissue remodeling. Thus, the separation of the 3 timescales enables approximately 24 hours of simulation time to qualitatively reproduce the processes of experimental rapid pacing and AF remodeling, which occur over weeks or months. Notably, the model inclusion of these 3 widely separated timescale requires approximately 24 hours of simulation time to reproduce the critical emergent dynamics of AF progression, and to our knowledge, these simulations represents the longest duration simulations reported of beat-to-beat cardiac electrophysiology tissue dynamics.

A simplified tissue representation represents a final important assumption of the model. To isolate the role of calcium feedback regulation and the remodeling processes, we assume an isotropic, 2-dimensional geometry with insulating boundaries, with a surface area approximating the total area of both atria.30 Voltage and calcium activation are known to be spatially variable in the atria.46 Previous studies have simulated heterogeneous tissue using specific static distributions of ion channel conductances or intercellular coupling, representing either healthy or pathological states.47 Additionally, populations of models approaches, typically performed in single-cell studies, have investigated responses for distributions of ion channel conductance levels.48–50 However, in this study, because the ion channel conductances and tissue properties are dynamic and are ultimately governed by the feedback mechanism, initial variation in the conductance values will converge to the level determined by the particular Catgt and the cell’s activation rate, as shown in Supplemental Figure 6. Therefore, for simplicity, we define the initial conditions for the conductance values with a homogeneous value of 1 for all γ (ie, the baseline model values), and we assume that tissue heterogeneity arises from heterogeneous Catgt values, as shown in Figure 3E.

In addition, the atrial anatomy is more complex: the left atrium is spheroidal, while the right atrium is cylindrical. They are joined together by the interatrial septum, and the auricles of both atria have a trabeculated, network-like structure. The atrial wall further has multiple layers,51 and conduction in tissue is anisotropic.52 Further, these structures remodel during the progression of AF, leading to perturbed conduction: atrial surface area increases and the tissue becomes fibrotic.30 The development of fibrosis during the course of AF not only is triggered by fast pacing, but also depends on local inflammation53 and mechanical stretch.54 For simplicity, we represent these structural changes as the dynamic intercellular coupling factor γD, which summarizes the long-term changes in tissue conduction. All of these details complicate the atrial geometry (fibrosis in particular providing distinct anchor points for re-entrant waves) leading to an increased possibility of re-entry.

Therefore, in order to separate the effects of complex structure and remodeling, we demonstrate that the simplified geometry, coupled with heterogeneous cells and intercellular connections, is sufficient to capture the initiation and progression of AF-associated re-entrant episodes.

ION CHANNEL REGULATION AND ADAPTATION TO PACING.

We highlight that the single-cell model integrating the 2 assumptions discussed previously (a single Catgt and expression level correlations) qualitatively reproduces the key response of atrial cells to rapid pacing (Figures 1A to 1D): ion channel expression changes in response to pacing, leading to the characteristic reduction in the CaT amplitude, APD, and resting membrane potential, and ultimately to a homeostatic prevention of Cai overload.43,55 The simulated rapidly paced atrial cell further establishes a natural, emergent steady state of remodeled expression levels, similar to experimental data, and reproduces the reversibility of pacing-induced changes,42 as seen in Figure 1A. In this context, it is also interesting to note that chronic bradycardia (in the ventricle) also leads to electrical remodeling, albeit in the opposite direction, leading to a decrease in IKr and IKs, and a faster activation of ICaL, driving a corresponding increase in APD.56 This phenomenon could also likely be explained by this model, demonstrating the broad utility of this simplified calcium regulatory feedback model framework: a slower pacing rate would naturally lead to a shift in expression to the left of the graph in Figure 1E, which is also equivalent to the 1,000-ms baseline pacing in a cell with higher Catgt, as shown in Supplemental Figure 10.

EMERGENT SPIRAL WAVE STABILIZATION.

By extending the single cell model to 2-dimensional tissue, we investigate for the first time the behavior of re-entrant waves in the presence of dynamic remodeling of the underlying substrate. In homogeneous tissue (defined as uniform Catgt), fast pacing drives changes in the tissue, leading to a transition from unstable spiral trajectories to the formation of a quasi-stable core.

It has previously been shown that defining parameters in an atrial cell model to correspond to changes seen in AF remodeling leads to the stabilization of spiral meandering.16,57 Notably, these studies consider the underlying tissue to be static. Recently, Jæger and Tveito58 used a dynamic model of ion channel expression, in which the conductance of ICaL is variable. Their single-cell results are in accordance with the results that we report in Figure 1. Further, they showed that ICaL conductance values predicted by fast pacing in the single cell can induce a sustained re-entry wave if used in a ring geometry (equivalent to a pulmonary vein). However, their tissue simulations use static values of the ICaL conductance, taken as snapshots from different time points in the single-cell simulations. Therefore, the tissue substrate is not directly coupled to the electrical activity it sustains and, as in previous work, is comparable to a study with constant parameters. Further, more broadly, prior work in other systems with significantly different timescales (such as adaptive networks) that treat the slow-modifying variables as constants lead to qualitatively different results when compared with simulating the complete coupled system.59

In our 2-dimensional simulations, the electrical activity is coupled at all times (through Cai) to the dynamic remodeling of the tissue substrate, which enables a series of novel observations. As noted previously, fast pacing leads to the stabilization of spiral wave trajectories. The properties and specific patterns of re-entrant wave trajectories are known to be affected by the balance between tissue excitability and the excitation threshold,60 as well as by the tissue APD and conduction velocity restitution curves.61 All of these properties are dynamically regulated in our model. Thus, rapid pacing leads to a dynamic transition to a new stable regime with lower excitability, shorter APD, and slower conduction velocity, which collectively in effect, constitute a trade-off between maintaining calcium homeostasis at the single-cell level for increased susceptibility to stable spirals at the tissue level.

Notably, in the setting of the uniform substrate, the location of the stable spiral core itself leads to an interesting spatial pattern, as noted previously: due to lower activation close to the spiral tip trajectory, the average Cai of the cells in this spatial region is lower, leading to an area of comparatively less remodeled tissue (ie, g values closer to the baseline of 1) (see Figure 2B), forming a “ring” shape. This pattern introduces an inhomogeneity in the tissue, which would otherwise be completely uniform. The established spiral wave then paces the entire tissue at a rate that is fast enough to maintain a new steady state in the electrical remodeling (see Supplemental Figure 8, for t > 1 hour), and crucially one that is favorable for spiral wave stability. However, over the longest timeline of approximately 24 hours, we also observe that the new state is not static: there is a long-term drift of the spiral core, as well as a transition in the re-entrant pattern. Finally, it is also interesting to note that remodeling can act as an anchor point for induced activity. This is apparent in the low Catgt tissue highlighted in Video 2. A late spiral, induced in the middle of the tissue, “jumps” and anchors to a ring remodeled by a previous re-entrant wave (at approximately the 22-hour mark). The implications of these long-term trends are discussed in more detail subsequently.

AF INITIATION AND PROGRESSION.

Last, we consider the response to rapid pacing in a large, heterogeneous atrial tissue (Central Illustration). First, we demonstrate that rapid pacing alone induces re-entry, as shown in the earliest studies of AF progression.2 As observed in Video 5, different regions within the heterogeneous tissue respond differently to fast pacing: calcium transient abnormalities lead to a localized, temporary conduction block around which a first re-entrant wave forms. This pattern is in accordance with experimental data showing irregular calcium signaling preceding re-entry.62

However, the initially induced re-entry is unstable, and subsequent pacing induces further transient re-entrant episodes. These in turn continue to contribute to substrate remodeling, such that re-entrant episodes become progressively longer (Figure 3B). This is one of the key results of our study, that the well-known dynamics of AF progression, seen in both experimental models (eg, the cornerstone example study of Wijffels et al)2 and patients,5 are an emergent behavior of the fully integrated atrial tissue model. As remodeling progresses, the tissue can sustain more re-entrant waves (Figure 5B), leading to more complex electric activity, consistent with studies showing an increase in the number of rotor locations in patients with longer history of AF.63 The same phenomenon is also illustrated by Climent et al,20 who studied the evolution of re-entry in cell cultures: the increased number in spiral tips (or phase singularities) and the resulting fragmentation of the re-entrant waves are directly comparable to the findings in Figures 5E and 5F. These changes, in turn, modify tissue voltage activity: simulations also capture the increase in the dominant frequency of activation (Figure 5B),16 as well as the fragmentation of the pseudo-ECG, indicative of more complex activation patterns, see Figure 4 in Wijffels et al2 and Figure 5 in the current paper. It is also interesting to note that the dynamics of both the spiral wave count and the dominant frequency are biphasic. There is an initial rapid increase, which corresponds with the timescale of electrical remodeling, followed by a more gradual increase as intercellular remodeling progresses (see γCaL and γD in Figures 3C and 3D, respectively). The initial electrical changes are sufficient to induce re-entry and thus transient AF episodes (corresponding to paroxysmal AF), while the longer-term intercellular changes are necessary for the transition to permanent re-entry. This timeline is consistent with the concept of a “second factor” in AF progression, in which longer-term structural changes are necessary for the transition to permanent AF.64,65 Finally, we also observe instances (ie, particular Catgt spatial patterns) in which the atrial tissue dynamics does not reach a persistent phase (Supplemental Figure 16), and rather exhibit behavior resembling long term paroxysmal AF.

The characteristics of electrical and calcium activity in the remodeled tissue (ie, at the end of the simulation from Figures 3 to 6) also match published experimental data associated with AF remodeling. The spatial pattern of APD is more heterogeneous than in the corresponding tissue paced at a baseline of 1,000 ms (Supplemental Figure 13C), corresponding to published data.66 Notably, the spatial locations corresponding with the transition between high and low APDs correspond with where re-entry is initiated (Video 5) and where the spiral tips tend to localize (Figure 5D), equivalent to data published by Avula et al.67 Further, conduction velocity is slower and more irregular (Supplemental Figure 13D).68,69 Voltage and calcium activity are dissociated (Figure 6E), hallmarks of highly remodeled atrial tissue,70 and the calcium activity exhibits an interesting, complex pattern of alternating high and low peaks, reminiscent of recent results from Iravanian et al71 that show complex periodicities in ventricular fibrillation. Notably, the only constraints we impose are the heterogeneous Catgt distribution and aforementioned cellular level assumptions. Therefore, all of the results in heterogeneous tissue and their agreement with experimental data are emergent, and moreover provide a mechanistic explanation for the phenomena discussed.

The long-term dynamics of the re-entrant waves observed present novel consideration. In the homogeneous tissue with the baseline Catgt = 258 nM, a single spiral wave stabilizes. On a short timescale, the location can appear to be stationary. However, as discussed previously, we observe a long-term drift (Supplemental Figure 8), along with a dynamic spiral tip pattern (Video 1). In effect, we identify a novel spiral drift mechanism (for a review of known causes for drift, see Biktashev)72 caused by substrate remodeling. This mechanism is directly influenced by the Catgt value: a high value (Catgt = 320 nM) prevents spiral wave formation altogether (Video 3), while a low value (Catgt = 200 nM) leads to dynamic activity, including shifting spiral locations, along with a complex pattern of remodeling (Video 2). The heterogeneous tissue Catgt values span the interval between these two extreme levels; it is thus notable that we find the highest density of rotor tips in the transition areas between high and low Catgt, where the homogeneous simulations would predict the most stable re-entry.

Early re-entrant activity can exist without a single preferential rotor location, resembling the earliest AF mathematical modeling studies,73,74 in which Moe et al observed multiple chaotic wavelets. However, in the example shown in Figures 3 to 6 preferential rotor locations appear in the low Catgt areas, especially toward the end of the simulation, pointing to a late organization of activity. We observe this pattern of spatially consistent re-entrant hotspots in other examples of permanent re-entry (see Videos 8 and 11), in which a noticeable spatial remodeling in the same “bump” pattern is induced, as in the homogeneous case. This leads to the intriguing hypothesis that AF driver regions and their associated remodeling pattern75 are inherently dynamic and can selforganize, induced by spiral waves forming their own substrate niche. Overall, our model predicts situations in which both chaotic wavelets and more stable rotors76 can exist. An interesting next step is to delineate conditions necessary for either case, as well as the corresponding clinical or experimental situations.

STUDY LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS.

Our model is limited by the large computational requirements necessary to simulate the long periods of time imposed by the timescales simulated. Therefore, we adopted a relatively simple geometry, as discussed previously. AF has been studied in computational models with increasingly more realistic geometries, incorporating whole atria 3-dimensional geometries derived directly from individual patient data.22 These models require significant spatial resolution leading to high computational costs and, as a consequence, simulation studies generally only reproduce at most several second of activity. Therefore, simulations only replicate snapshots of healthy or pathological tissue, instead of a dynamic continuum. However, it would be an interesting next step to integrate more complex aspects of atrial anatomy with our model, such as the network topology of the trabeculate auricles, periodic boundaries to mimic the cylindrical or spherical shapes of the atria, and multiple tissue layers to replicate the endo- and epicardium.51

The specific electrophysiological model used, the Courtemanche et al24 model introduces additional inherent limitations in the study. First, this model does not include important atrial-specific ion channels such as the 2 pore domain or the small conductance Ca2+-activated potassium channels, which have been shown to change in AF and are described in more complex recent models.77 Further, the Courtemanche et al model does not exhibit early or delayed afterdepolarizations,57 which have also been proposed as a source for AF initiation and maintenance alongside re-entrant waves, especially as the origin of rapid impulses from the pulmonary veins.78 Delayed afterdepolarizations are known to be caused by spontaneous calcium releases, in particular during calcium overload, which in turn depend on localized calcium release units (ie, t-tu-bules and sarcoplasmic reticulum). Recent models have succeeded in providing detailed descriptions of these subcellular structures and their pathological disruption.23,79 However, these advanced models greatly increase computational complexity—the simulation of a single cell becomes comparable (in resource requirements) to a 2-dimensional tissue using a simpler model.

However, despite these limitations, the Courtemanche et al model24 continues to be used in large-scale tissue simulations, for which computational efficiency is an important requirement. For example, it serves as a basis for a recent study by Boyle et al,80 in which the authors use whole-atria simulations to incorporate patient-specific data and successfully predict personalized arrhythmia risk and re-entrant wave locations. Thus, while more detailed and complex models have since been developed, the Courtemanche et al model still provides a sufficiently accurate approximation of atrial electrophysiology and arrhythmic activity. In our case, as with wholechamber or subcellular simulations, the computational cost is significant due to the multiple timescales and simulation durations considered. Therefore, we chose the Courtemanche et al model to represent atrial ionic current dynamics as a compromise between computational cost and complexity. Despite its relatively simple (but therefore efficient) formulation, it still describes detailed calcium cycling dynamics and most of the currents known to remodel in AF, and therefore the APD, conduction velocity, and excitability changes needed to model re-entrant wave activity. Finally, we note that the feedback model consists of a simple set of equations, which could easily be adapted to the more complex models mentioned previously, and indeed would be a natural extension of the current work.

CONCLUSIONS

More generally, as AF arises naturally in patients without outside interventions such as pacing, it is highly likely that there are other long-term substrate changes, which could be modeled by modifying the inherent properties of the feedback mechanism, such as the Catgt or the channel coexpression ratios. Such underlying changes could, for example, be the cause of rapid impulse generation at the pulmonary veins, which would lead to a naturally occurring regime of intermittent fast pacing driving further remodeling. A similar approach could also be readily applied more broadly to other settings of pathological long-term remodeling, such as in the ventricles during heart failure. In conclusion, we have introduced a novel framework to uncover the mechanisms underlying the full progression of AF, developing novel methodologies to enable the first ever simulations of this long timescale and spatiotemporally complex pathological process.

Supplementary Material

1
2
Download video file (8.5MB, mp4)
3
Download video file (5.8MB, mp4)
4
Download video file (7.9MB, mp4)
5
Download video file (7.5MB, mp4)
6
Download video file (8.2MB, mp4)
7
Download video file (7.9MB, mp4)
8
Download video file (16MB, mp4)
9
Download video file (16.2MB, mp4)
10
Download video file (8MB, mp4)
11
Download video file (7.6MB, mp4)
12
Download video file (6.8MB, mp4)

PERSPECTIVES.

COMPETENCY IN MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE:

AF is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. It is notable for being a progressive disease, with pathological processes that span a wide timescale: millisecond changes in ion channel and voltage dynamics driving protein expression and structural changes over days or weeks. Our study proposes a unifying mechanism driving AF progression, based on long-term calcium homeostasis. Simulations predict spontaneous spiral wave stabilization and progressively longer re-entrant electrical episodes that eventually become permanent, hallmarks of the disease. Critically, we observe a new phenomenon: re-entrant waves, through long-term remodeling, pattern their own emergent tissue “niches” that ensure long-term stability of arrhythmic activity.

TRANSLATIONAL OUTLOOK:

Our study unifies different lines of research (ion channel coregulation, calcium homeostasis, AF natural history) into a single framework and provides for the first time a computational investigation of the entire progression (ie, initiation to remodeling to stabilization) of AF. This opens a new perspective on in silico testing of novel drugs or drug combinations that can directly address AF progression, leading to the identification of new disease-modifying treatment strategies in AF.

FUNDING SUPPORT AND AUTHOR DISCLOSURES

This project was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health R01HL165751 to Dr Weinberg. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

ABBREVIATION AND ACRONYMS

AF

atrial fibrillation

AP

action potential

APD

action potential duration

Cai

intracellular

Catgt

calcium target

CaT

calcium transient

ECG

electrocardiogram

mRNA

messenger RNA

APPENDIX

For expanded Methods and References sections, and supplemental tables, figures, and videos, please see the online version of this paper.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014;129:837–847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wijffels MCEF, Kirchhof CJHJ, Dorland R, Allessie MA. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation: a study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation. 1995;92:1954–1968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grandi E, Pandit SV, Voigt N, et al. Human atrial action potential and Ca2+ model: sinus rhythm and chronic atrial fibrillation. Circ Res. 2011;109:1055–1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Corradi D, Callegari S, Maestri R, Benussi S, Alfieri O. Structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5:782–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heijman J, Voigt N, Nattel S, Dobrev D. Cellular and molecular electrophysiology of atrial fibrillation initiation, maintenance, and progression. Circ Res. 2014;114:1483–1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O’Leary T, Williams AH, Franci A, Marder E. Cell types, network homeostasis, and pathological compensation from a biologically plausible ion channel expression model. Neuron. 2014;82:809– [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moise N, Weinberg SH. Emergent activity, heterogeneity, and robustness in a calcium feedback model of the sinoatrial node. Biophys J. 2023;122: 1613–1632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ballouz S, Mangala MM, Perry MD, et al. Co-expression of calcium and hERG potassium channels reduces the incidence of proarrhythmic events. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117:2216–2227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Milstein ML, Musa H, Balbuena DP, et al. Dynamic reciprocity of sodium and potassium channel expression in a macromolecular complex controls cardiac excitability and arrhythmia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E2134–E2143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ponce-Balbuena D, Guerrero-Serna G, Valdivia CR, et al. Cardiac Kir2.1 and NaV1.5 channels traffic together to the sarcolemma to control excitability. Circ Res. 2018;122:1501–1516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jameson MB, Ríos-Pérez EB, Liu F, Eichel CA, Robertson GA. Pairwise biosynthesis of ion channels stabilizes excitability and mitigates arrhythmias. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120: e2305295120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Banyasz T, Horvath B, Jian Z, Izu LT, Chen-Izu Y. Sequential dissection of multiple ionic currents in single cardiac myocytes under action potential-clamp. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;50:578–581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rees CM, Yang J-H, Santolini M, Lusis AJ, Weiss JN, Karma A. The Ca2+ transient as a feedback sensor controlling cardiomyocyte ionic conductances in mouse populations. Elife. 2018;7: e36717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koldenhof T, Wijtvliet PEPJ, Pluymaekers NAHA, et al. Rate control drugs differ in the prevention of progression of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2022;24:384–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kurita Y. Daily oral verapamil before but not after rapid atrial excitation prevents electrical remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;54:447–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Martins RP, Kaur K, Hwang E, et al. Dominant frequency increase rate predicts transition from paroxysmal to long-term persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014;129:1472–1482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yue L, Feng J, Gaspo R, Li G-R, Wang Z, Nattel S. Ionic remodeling underlying action potential changes in a canine model of atrial fibrillation. Circ Res. 1997;81:512–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hesselkilde EZ, Carstensen H, Flethøj M, et al. Longitudinal study of electrical, functional and structural remodelling in an equine model of atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19:228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seibertz F, Rubio T, Springer R, et al. Atrial fibrillation-associated electrical remodelling in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived atrial cardiomyocytes: a novel pathway for anti-arrhythmic therapy development. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;119:2623–2637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Climent AM, Guillem MS, Fuentes L, et al. Role of atrial tissue remodeling on rotor dynamics: an in vitro study. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;309:H1964–H1973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ritzer A, Roeschl T, Nay S, Rudakova E, Volk T. Rapid pacing decreases L-type Ca2+ current and alters Cacna1c isogene expression in primary cultured rat left ventricular myocytes. J Membr Biol. 2023;256:257–269. 10.1007/s00232-023-00284-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Heijman J, Sutanto H, Crijns HJGM, Nattel S, Trayanova NA. Computational models of atrial fibrillation: achievements, challenges, and perspectives for improving clinical care. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117:1682–1699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang X, Ni H, Morotti S, et al. Mechanisms of spontaneous Ca2+ release-mediated arrhythmia in a novel 3D human atrial myocyte model: I. Transverse-axial tubule variation. J Physiol. 2023;601:2655–2683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Courtemanche M, Ramirez RJ, Nattel S. Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: insights from a mathematical model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1998;275:H301–H321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.O’Leary T, Wyllie DJA. Neuronal homeostasis: time for a change? J Physiol. 2011;589:4811–4826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Braudel F. Histoire et sciences sociales: la longue durée. Ann Hist Sci Soc. 1958;13:725–753. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gross T, Sayama H, eds. Adaptive Networks: Theory, Models and Applications. Springer; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pandit SV, Jalife J. Rotors and the dynamics of cardiac fibrillation. Circ Res. 2013;112:849–862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kane C, Terracciano CMN. Concise review: criteria for chamber-specific categorization of human cardiac myocytes derived from pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells. 2017;35:1881–1897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gunturiz-Beltrán C, Nuñez-Garcia M, Althoff TF, et al. Progressive and simultaneous right and left atrial remodeling uncovered by a comprehensive magnetic resonance assessment in atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e026028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ausma J, Litjens N, Lenders M-H, et al. Time course of atrial fibrillation-induced cellular structural remodeling in atria of the goat. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001;33:2083–2094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ohio Supercomputer Center. 1987. Columbus OH: Ohio Supercomputer Center. Accessed March 31, 2025. http://osc.edu/ark:/19495/f5s1ph73 [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Boerner TJ, Deems S, Furlani TR, Knuth SL, Towns J. Access: advancing innovation: NSF’s Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: services & support. In: Sinkovits R, Romanella A, Knuth S, Hackworth K, Pummill J, eds. PEARC ’23: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2023: Computing for the Common Good. Association for Computing Machinery; 2023:173–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qi XY, Yeh Y-H, Xiao L, et al. Cellular signaling underlying atrial tachycardia remodeling of L-type calcium current. Circ Res. 2008;103:845–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Luo X, Pan Z, Shan H, et al. MicroRNA-26 governs profibrillatory inward-rectifier potassium current changes in atrial fibrillation. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1939–1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xiao L, Coutu P, Villeneuve LR, et al. Mechanisms underlying rate-dependent remodeling of transient outward potassium current in canine ventricular myocytes. Circ Res. 2008;103:733–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Greiser M, Neuberger H-R, Harks E, et al. Distinct contractile and molecular differences between two goat models of atrial dysfunction: AV block-induced atrial dilatation and atrial fibrillation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;46:385–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schulz C, Lemoine MD, Mearini G, et al. PITX2 knockout induces key findings of electrical remodeling as seen in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023:e011602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fakuade FE, Hubricht D, Möller V, et al. Impaired intracellular calcium buffering contributes to the arrhythmogenic substrate in atrial myocytes from patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2024;150:544–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eisner DA, Caldwell JL, Kistamás K, Trafford AW. Calcium and excitation-contraction coupling in the heart. Circ Res. 2017;121:181–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Goette A, Honeycutt C, Langberg JJ. Electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation: time course and mechanisms. Circulation. 1996;94:2968–2974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Moriguchi M, Niwano S, Yoshizawa N, et al. Inhomogeneity in the appearance of electrical remodeling during chronic rapid atrial pacing: evaluation of the dispersion of atrial effective refractoriness. Jap Circ J. 2001;65:335–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ausma J, Dispersyn GD, Duimel H, et al. Changes in ultrastructural calcium distribution in goat atria during atrial fibrillation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000;32:355–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Van Der Velden H. Gap junctional remodeling in relation to stabilization of atrial fibrillation in the goat. Cardiovasc Res. 2000;46:476–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jæger KH, Charwat V, Wall S, Healy KE, Tveito A. Do calcium channel blockers applied to cardiomyocytes cause increased channel expression resulting in reduced efficacy? NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024;10:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Niort B, Recalde A, Cros C, Brette F. Critical link between calcium regional heterogeneity and atrial fibrillation susceptibility in sheep left atria. J Clin Med. 2023;12:746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Trayanova NA, Lyon A, Shade J, Heijman J. Computational modeling of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis: toward clinical translation. Physiol Rev. 2024;104:1265–1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ni H, Morotti S, Zhang X, Dobrev D, Grandi E. Integrative human atrial modeling unravels interactive PKA and CaMKII signaling as key determinant of atrial arrhythmogenesis. Cardiovasc Res. 2023:cvad118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gong JQX, Sobie EA. Population-based mechanistic modeling allows for quantitative predictions of drug responses across cell types. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2018;4:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Miller JA, Moise N, Weinberg SH. Modeling incomplete penetrance in long QT syndrome type 3 through ion channel heterogeneity: an in silico population study. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023;324:H179–H197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Verheule S, Eckstein J, Linz D, et al. Role of endo-epicardial dissociation of electrical activity and transmural conduction in the development of persistent atrial fibrillation. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2014;115:173–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aslanidi OV, Boyett MR, Dobrzynski H, Li J, Zhang H. Mechanisms of transition from normal to reentrant electrical activity in a model of rabbit atrial tissue: interaction of tissue heterogeneity and anisotropy. Biophys J. 2009;96:798–817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hu Y-F, Chen Y-J, Lin Y-J, Chen S-A. Inflammation and the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:230–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Medvedev RY, Afolabi SO, Turner DGP, Glukhov AV. Mechanisms of stretch-induced electro-anatomical remodeling and atrial arrhythmogenesis. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2024;193:11–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sun H, Gaspo R, Leblanc N, Nattel S. Cellular mechanisms of atrial contractile dysfunction caused by sustained atrial tachycardia. Circulation. 1998;98:719–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tsuji Y, Opthof T, Yasui K, et al. Ionic mechanisms of acquired QT prolongation and torsades de pointes in rabbits with chronic complete atrioventricular block. Circulation. 2002;106:2012–2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cherry EM, Evans SJ. Properties of two human atrial cell models in tissue: restitution, memory, propagation, and reentry. J Theor Biol. 2008;254:674–690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jæger KH, Tveito A. A possible path to persistent re-entry waves at the outlet of the left pulmonary vein. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024;10:79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Garlaschelli D, Capocci A, Caldarelli G. Self-organized network evolution coupled to extremal dynamics. Nat Phys. 2007;3:813–817. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jahnke W, Winfree AT. A survey of spiral-wave behaviors in the oregonator model. Int J Bifurcation Chaos. 1991;1:445–466. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fenton FH, Cherry EM, Hastings HM, Evans SJ. Multiple mechanisms of spiral wave breakup in a model of cardiac electrical activity. Chaos. 2002;12:852–892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu T, Xiong F, Qi X-Y, et al. Altered calcium handling produces reentry-promoting action potential alternans in atrial fibrillation-remodeled hearts. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e133754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lim HS, Hocini M, Dubois R, et al. Complexity and distribution of drivers in relation to duration of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1257–1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Garratt CJ, Fynn SP. Atrial electrical remodelling and atrial fibrillation. QJM. 2000;93:563–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stiles MK, John B, Wong CX, et al. Paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation is associated with an abnormal atrial substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1182–1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fareh S, Villemaire C, Nattel S. Importance of refractoriness heterogeneity in the enhanced vulnerability to atrial fibrillation induction caused by tachycardia-induced atrial electrical remodeling. Circulation. 1998;98:2202–2209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Avula UMR, Hernandez JJ, Yamazaki M, et al. Atrial infarction-induced spontaneous focal discharges and atrial fibrillation in sheep: role of dantrolene-sensitive aberrant ryanodine receptor calcium release. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e005659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gaspo R, Bosch RF, Talajic M, Nattel S. Functional mechanisms underlying tachycardia-induced sustained atrial fibrillation in a chronic dog model. Circulation. 1997;96:4027–4035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Heida A, Van Schie MS, Van Der Does WFB, Taverne YJHJ, Bogers AJJC, De Groot NMS. Reduction of conduction velocity in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Enríquez-Vázquez D, Quintanilla JG, García-Escolano A, et al. Non-invasive electromechanical assessment during atrial fibrillation identifies underlying atrial myopathy alterations with early prognostic value. Nat Commun. 2023;14:4613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Iravanian S, Uzelac I, Shah AD, et al. Higher-order dynamics beyond repolarization alternans in ex-vivo human ventricles are independent of the restitution properties. medRxiv. Posted online August 21, 2023. 10.1101/2023.08.16.23293853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Biktashev V. Drift of spiral waves. Scholarpedia. 2007;2:1836. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Moe GK, Abildskov JA. Atrial fibrillation as a self-sustaining arrhythmia independent of focal discharge. Am Heart J. 1959;58:59–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Moe GK, Rheinboldt WC, Abildskov JA. A computer model of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 1964;67:200–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hansen BJ, Zhao J, Li N, et al. Human atrial fibrillation drivers resolved with integrated functional and structural imaging to benefit clinical mapping. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:1501–1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Jalife J. Mother rotors and fibrillatory conduction: a mechanism of atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;54:204–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ni H, Fogli Iseppe A, Giles WR, et al. Populations of in silico myocytes and tissues reveal synergy of multiatrial-predominant K+-current block in atrial fibrillation. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177:4497–4515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chen Y-J, Chen S-A, Chen Y-C, et al. Effects of rapid atrial pacing on the arrhythmogenic activity of single cardiomyocytes from pulmonary veins: implication in initiation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2001;104:2849–2854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zhang X, Smith CER, Morotti S, et al. Mechanisms of spontaneous Ca2+ release-mediated arrhythmia in a novel 3D human atrial myocyte model: II. Ca2+ -handling protein variation. J Physiol. 2023;601:2685–2710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Boyle PM, Zghaib T, Zahid S, et al. Computationally guided personalized targeted ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3:870–879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
Download video file (8.5MB, mp4)
3
Download video file (5.8MB, mp4)
4
Download video file (7.9MB, mp4)
5
Download video file (7.5MB, mp4)
6
Download video file (8.2MB, mp4)
7
Download video file (7.9MB, mp4)
8
Download video file (16MB, mp4)
9
Download video file (16.2MB, mp4)
10
Download video file (8MB, mp4)
11
Download video file (7.6MB, mp4)
12
Download video file (6.8MB, mp4)

RESOURCES