Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine logoLink to Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine
. 1973 Oct;37(4):413–417.

Use of Mailed Questionnaire Data in a Study of Swine Congenital Malformations

L A Selby 1,2, L D Edmonds 1,2, D W Parke 1,2, R W Stewart 1,2, C J Marienfeld 1,2, W F Heidlage 1,2
PMCID: PMC1319802  PMID: 4270814

Abstract

A study was designed to evaluate the representativeness and accuracy of data collected on swine birth defects by mailed questionnaire. The study was conducted in the three contiguous counties of Johnson, Lafayette and Pettis in west central Missouri. A personal interview survey and an examination of malformed pigs were used to validate mailed questionnaire data which estimated the frequency and distribution of malformations observed in pigs over a six month period. This period between April and September 1970 was defined as the study period. The results were compared to a previous six month period (April-September 1969), or baseline period, when only the mailed questionnaire was used. The frequency and distribution of the reported malformations by type did not differ significantly (at the p=0.05 level) between the study period (70.4% response) and the baseline period (31.3% response). Evaluation of this and additional data collected during the study suggested that the mailed questionnaire can be used effectively to estimate the frequency and distribution of swine malformations within a defined geographic area.

Full text

PDF
413

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Marienfeld C. J., Silberg S. L., Menges R. W., Crawford W. T., Wright H. T. Multi-species study of congenital malformations in Missouri. Mo Med. 1967 Mar;64(3):230–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Menges R. W., Selby L. A., Marienfeld C. J., Aue W. A., Greer D. L. A tobacco related epidemic of congenital limb deformities in swine. Environ Res. 1970 Nov;3(4):285–302. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(70)90022-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Peters J. A. Symposium on virus research. Standard nomenclature and data retrieval in veterinary medicine. Am J Vet Res. 1967 Mar;28(123):531–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Priester W. A., Glass A. G., Waggoner N. S. Congenital defects in domesticated animals: general considerations. Am J Vet Res. 1970 Oct;31(10):1871–1879. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Selby L. A., Hopps H. C., Edmonds L. D. Comparative aspects of congenital malformations in man and swine. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1971 Dec 1;159(11):1485–1490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Selby L. A., Marienfeld C. J., Heidlage W., Wright H. T., Young V. E. Evaluation of a method to estimate the prevalence of congenital malformations in swine, using a mailed questionnaire. Cornell Vet. 1971 Apr;61(2):203–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Selby L. A., Menges R. W., Houser E. C., Flatt R. E., Case A. A. Outbreak of swine malformations associated with the wild black cherry, Prunus serotina. Arch Environ Health. 1971 Apr;22(4):496–501. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1971.10665885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES