Abstract
Background
Continuity of HIV treatment among pregnant and breastfeeding women (PBFW) living with HIV is challenging in South Sudan. Understanding factors associated with interruption in treatment (IIT) among PBFW on antiretroviral therapy (ART) may inform programmatic interventions to improve care and continuity of treatment.
Methods
A retrospective cohort analysis of records of PBFW on ART in twenty health facilities was conducted. A probability-proportionate-to-size sampling (PPS) method was used to select facilities with PBFW on ART for at least six months from 01/10/2019 to 01/02/2022 prior to date of data abstraction. Demographic and clinical information were abstracted from facility-based registers and client files. Abstracted ART visit data were used to calculate IIT, and multi-month dispensing (MMD) of ART. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to calculate measures of association for IIT.
Results
A total of 1,478 PBFW on ART were included; 37% had IIT. Home delivery compared to facility delivery (Adj.PR = 1.3, 95% C.I: 1.04–1.49) and receiving MMD for < 3 months compared to ≥ 6 months (Adj.PR = 1.6, 95% C.I: 1.30–2.00) were significantly associated with IIT among PBFW. Those attending one Antenatal Care (ANC) visit compared to ≥ 3 (Adj.PR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.66–0.96) were less likely to have IIT.
Conclusions
Over one-third of PBFW on ART had IIT, which was associated with three factors: number of ANC visits, place of delivery, and frequency of MMD. MMD for PBFW was not associated with IIT, supporting its use in areas with similar challenges to South Sudan.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-026-27413-1.
Keywords: Interruption in treatment, continuity in treatment, retention in HIV care, MMD among PBFW
Background
Ensuring continuity in HIV treatment and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) throughout the pregnancy and postpartum periods is essential both for maternal health and to decrease the risk of vertical transmission. While prevention of vertical transmission (PVT) programs have greatly reduced new child infections over the past twenty years, gaps exist within the PVT cascade of services in South Sudan [1].
Interruptions in HIV treatment (IIT) during pregnancy and breastfeeding lead to increased maternal viral load, increased risk of mortality, HIV disease progression, and increased risk of vertical transmission, and potentially undiagnosed and untreated children living with HIV [2–4]. Estimates of continuity in HIV treatment among PBFW in sub-Saharan Africa range widely from 56% to 97% at the first PVT follow-up visit and from 47% to 88% 6 months after ART initiation [5]. High IIT rates have been described across all timepoints in the pregnant and postpartum periods [6].
In studies in Eastern and Southern Africa, low retention in HIV care and treatment during pregnancy and postpartum has been associated with rural residency, lower educational level, unemployment, non-disclosure of HIV status to a partner, age, newly initiating treatment, and late presentation to antenatal care [7–9].
Given the unique geo-political and health system context in South Sudan, it is important to understand if the same factors also contribute to IIT. South Sudan is the world’s youngest nation, and since gaining independence in 2011, remains impacted by political instability, conflict, and severe droughts and floods [10]. Many residents of South Sudan have poor access to health services and the maternal and infant mortality rates are among the highest in the world [11]. About 31% of women in South Sudan attended 4 + antenatal care (ANC) visits [12] compared to 58% of women in Sub-Saharan Africa [13], and an estimated 42% of women delivered in a health facility during their last pregnancy [12].
South Sudan is one of the few countries in the Eastern and Southern Africa region where the number of new child HIV infections is greater than the estimated new infections averted due to PVT programming [1]. In 2023, an estimated 6,200 pregnant women in South Sudan needed ART, with about 76% of those women receiving ART during pregnancy, and the vertical transmission rate of HIV was about 20% [1]. South Sudan prescribes 3- to 6-month refills of ART to PBFW as a standard of care. Multi-month dispensing (MMD) is a model that provides stable clients on ART with drug refills every 3 or 6 months instead of monthly to reduce ART clinic visits and support client-centered care. The model is supported by the World health Organization (WHO) for the general population [14]. Recognizing that conflict and frequent environmental disasters create potential difficulties for clients to access ART clinics, South Sudan’s national guidelines endorse dispensing ART for up to a 6- month supply, including to pregnant and breastfeeding women (PBFW) [15]. Given the unique context of South Sudan and the importance of treatment continuity in the PVT cascade, we aim to describe the factors associated with IIT among PBFW across the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-supported sites in South Sudan.
Methods
Study setting and design
A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 01/08/2022 to 30/09/2022 using health facility-based records from 20 PEPFAR-supported health facilities in three urban (Juba, Yambio, and Torit), three peri-urban (Yei, Wau, and Rumbek), and four rural (Yirol West, Kapoeta South, Magwi, and Maridi) counties in South Sudan. The 10 counties were selected based on a high volume of PBFW on ART. Together, the 10 counties cover 80% of PBFW on ART among PEPFAR-supported facilities. PBFW in most of the PEPFAR-supported health facilities in South Sudan receive antenatal care (ANC) in a separate clinic from where they receive HIV care and ART; PBFW are tested for HIV at ANC clinics and if found to be positive, enrolled in an ART clinic and referred to PVT services. In South Sudan, PVT services include pre-and post-test counseling at ANC clinics, client treatment, viral load testing and treatment literacy during ART initiation and follow up at the ART and PVT clinics. While the clinics are usually in proximity, pregnant women living with HIV (PWLHIV) are required to see two separate providers, one to provide ANC and another to provide ART.
This was a secondary data analysis reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistently with applicable federal law and CDC policy. † Consent to participate was waived by the South Sudan National Ministry of Health research ethics review board (MOH-RERB).
Study population
For this study, inclusion criteria include PBFW living with HIV, ages 14–45 years who were enrolled at selected health facilities providing PVT care, and on ART at the beginning of the study period. Eligible clients were pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV (PBFWLHIV) enrolled in ART clinics for at least six months from 01/10/2019 to 01/02/2022 prior to date of data abstraction. We excluded those who were missing data on date of enrollment.
Sample size determination and data collection procedure
The following data sources were used to collect client-level information from facility records: (1) ANC PVT patient register to collect clients’ socio-demographic, gravidity, and ANC attendance data (2) pharmacy dispensing logs/ART register/missed appointment and IIT tracking registers to collect ART initiation, (3) Maternity register to collect data on place of delivery (4) HIV care and ART card to collect ART attendance data. Records for each patient were matched using a unique identifier.
Health facilities with PVT services were selected using probability-proportionate-to-size sampling (PPS). The sample size for the current study was informed by the duration of data abstraction. Records were utilized to assess IIT among PBFW living with HIV enrolled in the PVT program for at least six months from 01/10/2019 to 01/02/2022 prior to date of data abstraction.
which varied by facility and ranged from 01/08/2022 to 30/09/2022. Data were abstracted from hard copy documents/registers and to hard copy standardized study data collection forms that were stored in a secured location. Data from the study forms were entered into a secure electronic database designed in EPI-INFO (version 7.2.3.1, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA, USA).
Study variables and measurement
The outcome variable was “interruption in treatment”, defined as missing the first ART follow-up visit after enrollment in PVT care by greater than 28 days from the scheduled date. IIT was measured as either ‘yes’ (missing first ART follow-up visit by greater than 28 days) or ‘no’ (documented first visit ART follow-up visit date is within 28 days of scheduled appointment date). This includes already on ART and new on ART clients. Data on sociodemographic, obstetric, and HIV-related variables was collected: maternal age at ANC registration, client location/residence, marital status, main occupation, parity, gravida, number of ANC visits, gestational age at ANC registration, HIV status at entry to ANC1 (known or new), HIV treatment status at entry to PVT (already on ART or newly initiating), and place of delivery. Multi-month drug dispensing (MMD) was calculated using the number of days between the initial visit date and the first scheduled follow-up visit date as a proxy to determine MMD. Those with a scheduled follow-up that was before the initial visit date were set as missing for the MMD variable. A month was defined as 30 days and categories were created for < 3 months (no MMD), 3–5 months, and ≥ 6 months.
Statistical analysis
The data were entered into an automated database designed using EPI-INFO. Data was analyzed using STATA® standard edition version 17 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, Texas, USA). Descriptive statistics were conducted to describe the demographic, obstetric, and HIV treatment characteristics of PBFWLHIV. The Pearson chi-square test was used to test for differences between groups. The differences between IIT and age, place of delivery, client residential area, and MMD were measured using Bartlett’s test for equal variances.
Prevalence ratios (PRs) were used as a measure of association between IIT and socio-demographic and other variables. A generalized linear model (GLM) analysis was conducted using a robust standard error Poisson regression, taking into consideration the high prevalence outcome. All independent factors with a p-value < 0.15 and biologically plausible variables were included in the multivariable model. A stepwise model-building technique was used to ascertain the best-fitting model with a log likelihood tending towards zero. For all tests, a p-value ≤ 0.05 at 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was considered statistically significant. Unadjusted PRs (PRs), adjusted prevalence ratios (Adj.PR), and their respective 95% CI were reported.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics
A total of 1,478 PBFW on ART were included in the study. Approximately one third resided in each of the urban, peri-urban, and rural areas settings (33.8%, 33.6%, and 32.6%, respectively). More than half of the participants (58.9%) were aged 20–29 years, with a median age of 27 years withan age range of 14–45. Majority (84.3%) of the participants were married and unemployed (80.1%). Most women (90.7%) were multigravida, 23.6% delivered at home, 31.8% enrolled in ANC before 16 weeks of gestational age, 53.2% had known HIV positive status before ANC enrollment, and 59.8% of all clients received ≥ 6 months of MMD (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of PBFW on ART in 20 PEPFAR-supported Health Facilities, South Sudan, 2022
| Variable | Frequency | Percentage (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at ANC Registration (n = 1474) | ||||
| 14–19 | 113 | 7.7 | ||
| 20–29 | 868 | 58.9 | ||
| 30–39 | 475 | 32.2 | ||
| 40–45 | 18 | 1.2 | ||
| Client’s Location/Residence (n = 1478) | ||||
| Urban area | 500 | 33.8 | ||
| Peri-Urban area | 496 | 33.6 | ||
| Rural area | 482 | 32.6 | ||
| Marital Status (n = 1410) | ||||
| Never Married | 180 | 12.8 | ||
| Married | 1,188 | 84.3 | ||
| Divorced/Widowed | 42 | 2.9 | ||
| Client’s Main Occupation (n = 1434) | ||||
| Unemployed | 1,149 | 80.1 | ||
| Employed | 285 | 19.9 | ||
| Client’s Gravida (Number of Pregnancies) (n = 1238) | ||||
| 1 | 115 | 9.3 | ||
| 2 | 235 | 19.0 | ||
| ≥3 | 888 | 71.7 | ||
| Number of ANC Visits (n = 1303) | ||||
| 1 visit | 639 | 49.1 | ||
| 2 visits | 373 | 28.6 | ||
| ≥3 visits | 291 | 22.3 | ||
| Place of Delivery (n = 1397) | ||||
| At Health Facility | 1,067 | 76.4 | ||
| At home | 330 | 23.6 | ||
| Gestational age at ANC registration (n = 1170) | ||||
| <16 weeks | 372 | 31.8 | ||
| ≥16 weeks | 798 | 68.2 | ||
| HIV status at entry to ANC 1 (n = 1430) | ||||
| Newly tested Positive | 675 | 46.1 | ||
| Known Positive | 790 | 53.9 | ||
| Birth Outcomes (n = 1382) | ||||
| Live Birth-LB | 1,356 | 98.1 | ||
| Still Birth-MSB | 16 | 1.2 | ||
| Neonatal Death-ND | 10 | 0.7 | ||
| Treatment status at entry to PVT (n = 1431) | ||||
| Already on ART | 781 | 54.6 | ||
| New on ART | 650 | 45.4 | ||
| MMD (n = 1,434) | ||||
| <3 Months | 156 | 10.9 | ||
| 3–5 Months MMD | 421 | 29.3 | ||
| ≥ 6 Months MMD | 857 | 59.8 | ||
Interruption in Treatment (IIT)
The overall proportion of clients with IIT was 37.2% (n = 550). Statistically significant differences were observed in treatment interruption among PBFW across marital status (p < 0.001), place of delivery (p = 0.012), number of ANC visits (p = 0.043), and MMD (p < 0.001). There were no differences in IIT by age, client’s location, or occupation (Table 2).
Table 2.
The distribution of Interruption in Treatment Among Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women (PBFW) on ART in 20 PEPFAR-supported Health Facilities -South Sudan, 2022
| Treatment Interruption | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal Factors | Frequency (N) | Yes (%) | No (%) | p (< 0.05) * | ||||
| Total | 1478 | 550 (37.2) | 928 (62.8) | N/A | ||||
| Age at ANC Registration | ||||||||
| 14–19 | 113 | 38 (33.6) | 75 (66.4) | 0.409 | ||||
| 20–29 | 868 | 323 (37.2) | 545 (62.8) | |||||
| 30–39 | 475 | 182 (38.3) | 293 (61.7) | |||||
| 40–45 | 18 | 6 (33.3) | 12 (66.7) | |||||
| Total | 1,474 | 549 (37.2) | 925 (62.8) | |||||
| Client’s Location/Residence | ||||||||
| Urban area | 500 | 204 (40.8) | 296 (59.2) | 0.096 | ||||
| Peri-Urban area | 496 | 170 (34.3) | 326 (65.7) | |||||
| Rural area | 482 | 176 (36.5) | 306 (63.5) | |||||
| Total | 1,478 | 550 (37.2) | 928 (62.8) | |||||
| Marital Status | ||||||||
| Never Married | 180 | 48 (26.7) | 132 (73.3) | < 0.001 | ||||
| Married | 1,188 | 471 (39.7) | 717 (60.3) | |||||
| Divorced/Widowed | 42 | 10 (23.8) | 32 (76.2) | |||||
| Total | 1,410 | 529 (37.5) | 881 (62.5) | |||||
| Client’s Main Occupation | ||||||||
| Unemployed | 1,149 | 438 (38.1) | 711 (61.9) | 0.166 | ||||
| Employed | 285 | 96 (33.7) | 189 (66.3) | |||||
| Total | 1,434 | 534 (37.2) | 900 (62.8) | |||||
| Number of ANC Visits | ||||||||
| 1 visit | 639 | 224 (35.1) | 415 (64.9) | 0.043 | ||||
| 2 visits | 373 | 143 (38.3) | 230 (61.7) | |||||
| 3 + visits | 291 | 127 (43.6) | 164 (56.4) | |||||
| Total | 1,303 | 494 (37.9) | 809 (62.1) | |||||
| Place of Delivery | ||||||||
| At Health Facility | 1,067 | 390 (36.6) | 677 (63.4) | 0.012 | ||||
| At home | 330 | 128 (38.8) | 202 (61.2) | |||||
| Total | 1,397 | 518 (37.1) | 879 (62.9) | |||||
| MMD | ||||||||
| < 3 months | 156 | 75 (48.1) | 81 (51.9) | < 0.001 | ||||
| 3–5 Months MMD | 421 | 177 (42.0) | 244 (58.0) | |||||
| ≥ 6 Months MMD | 857 | 283 (33.0) | 574 (67.0) | |||||
| Total | 1,434 | 535 (37.3) | 899 (62.7) | |||||
*chi square test was conducted for p values
Multivariable analysis of socio-demographic factors associated with interruption in treatment among PBFW on ART
After adjusting for potential confounders, the study found significant associations between ANC attendance, place of delivery, and MMD (Table 3). Pregnant women attending only one ANC visit were less likely to have ITT compared to those attending three or more ANC visits (Adj.PR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.66–0.96). Women who delivered at home were statistically significantly more likely to have IIT compared to those who delivered at a health facility (Adj.PR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.04–1.49). PBFW who received less than three months of medication were more likely to have IIT compared to those who received ≥ 6 months of medication (Adj.PR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.30–2.00).
Client age at ANC registration, residence, HIV status at entry to ANC, main occupation, marital status, and treatment status at PVT enrollment were not significantly associated with treatment interruption among PBFW.
Table 3.
Multivariate analysis of Potential Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Treatment Interruption among PBFW ART in 20 PEPFAR-Supported Health Facilities, South Sudan, 2022
| Interruption in Treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Total N | Yes [n (%)] | No [n (%)] | Unadjusted PR, 95% CI | Adjusted PR*|, 95% CI | P value |
| Age at ANC Registration (N = 1,474) | ||||||
| 14–19 | 113 | 38 (33.6) | 75 (66.4) | 0.9 [0.69–1.19] | 1.0 [0.74–1.34] | 0.972 |
| 20–29 | 868 | 323 (37.2) | 545 (62.8) | 1 | 1 | |
| 30–39 | 475 | 182 (38.3) | 293 (61.7) | 1.0 [0.89–1.19] | 1.1 [0.95–1.32] | 0.161 |
| 40–45 | 18 | 6 (33.3) | 12 (66.7) | 0.9 [0.46–1.73] | 0.8 [0.34–1.69] | 0.503 |
| Client’s Location/Residence ,(N = 1478) | ||||||
| Urban Area | 500 | 204 (40.8) | 296 (59.2) | 1 | 1 | |
| Peri-Urban Area | 496 | 170 (34.3) | 326 (65.7) | 0.8 [0.72–0.99] | 1.0 [0.79–1.19] | 0.761 |
| Rural Area | 482 | 176 (36.5) | 306 (63.5) | 0.9 [0.76–1.05] | 0.9 [0.73–1.08] | 0.227 |
| Marital Status (N = 1,410) | ||||||
| Married | 1,188 | 471 (39.7) | 717 (60.3) | 1 | 1 | |
| Never Married | 180 | 48 (26.7) | 132 (73.3) | 0.7 [0.52–0.87] | 0.8 [0.59–1.04] | 0.095 |
| Divorced/Widowed | 42 | 10 (23.8) | 32 (76.2) | 0.6 [0.35–1.04] | 0.7 [0.39–1.21] | 0.195 |
| Number of ANC Visits (N = 1,303) | ||||||
| 3 + Visits | 291 | 127 (43.6) | 164 (56.4) | 1 | 1 | |
| 2 Visits | 373 | 143 (38.3) | 230 (61.7) | 0.9 [0.73–1.06] | 0.9 [0.72–1.08] | 0.217 |
| 1 visit | 639 | 224 (35.1) | 415 (64.9) | 0.8 [0.68–0.95] | 0.8 [0.66–0.96] | 0.019 |
| Place of Birth Delivery (N = 1,397) | ||||||
| At Health Facility | 1,067 | 390 (36.6) | 677 (63.4) | 1 | 1 | |
| At home | 330 | 128 (38.8) | 202 (61.2) | 1.1 [0.91–1.24] | 1.3 [1.04–1.49] | 0.018 |
| Types of entry to PVT (N = 1,465) | ||||||
| Known Positive † | 790 | 310 (39.2) | 480 (60.8) | 0.9 [0.78–1.02] | 1.0 [0.76–1.40] | 0.850 |
| Newly tested Positive ‡ | 675 | 235 (34.8) | 440 (65.8) | 1 | 1 | |
| Treatment Status at Entry to PVT (N = 1,431) | ||||||
| Already on ART § | 781 | 302 (38.7) | 479 (61.3) | 1 | 1 | |
| New on ART || | 650 | 226 (34.8) | 424 (65.2) | 0.9 [0.78–1.03] | 0.9 [0.68–1.26] | 0.637 |
| Clients’ Occupation (N = 1,434) | ||||||
| Unemployed | 1,149 | 438 (38.1) | 711 (61.9) | 1 | 1 | |
| Employed | 285 | 96 (33.7) | 189 (66.3) | 0.9 [0.74–1.06] | 1.0 [0.82–1.22] | 0.992 |
| MMD (N = 1,434) | ||||||
| <3 Months (No MMD) | 156 | 75 (48.1) | 81 (51.9) | 1.5 [1.21–1.76] | 1.6 [1.30–2.00] | < 0.001 |
| 3–5 Months | 421 | 177 (42.0) | 244 (58.0) | 1.3 [1.10–1.48] | 1.3 [1.12–1.58] | 0.001 |
| ≥6 Months | 857 | 283 (33.0) | 574 (67.0) | 1 | 1 | |
PR Prevalence Ratio, CI Confidence interval
*p < 0.05;
† (Newly tested positive at ANC 1 and Positive at Post ANC1)
‡ (Known positive on ART+ Known Positive not on ART)
§ (Already on ART prior to current ART enrolment
|| (New on ART in pregnancy and new on ART-postpartum)
Discussion
This study highlights the factors associated with interruption in treatment among PBFW enrolled in PVT in South Sudan. It demonstrates potential areas for improving the continuity of treatment for PBFW on ART. South Sudan is the youngest nation in the world, with multiple obstacles to the successful HIV treatment of PBFW. Implementing a PVT program in South Sudan is particularly challenging due to a combination of weak health infrastructure, and ongoing conflicts. Conflict and displacement have disrupted health systems and made large portions of the country inaccessible, especially during the rainy season [10]. Low ANC attendance and high rates of home births limit opportunities for HIV testing and maternal ART initiation [12].
Our analysis examined the following factors among PBFW: rural residency, education levels, employment, age, newly initiating HIV treatment, timing of presentation to antenatal care, and MMD. Previous studies in Eastern and Southern Africa have found associations between all these factors and IIT in their context [5, 7–9, 16–18]. However, none assessed MMD. While we evaluated IIT, which we defined as missing the first ART follow-up visit by greater than 28 days after enrollment in PVT services, prior studies that we refer to all used different definitions of IIT, lost to follow-up, retention in care, or continuity of treatment.
This analysis demonstrated that, overall, among the study population, 37.2% of participants with PBFW had IIT. This falls within the upper range of estimates from a 2018 review of eight African countries, which estimated IIT after the first PVT visit to be between 3% and 44% [5].
PBFW in South Sudan receive HIV treatment in ART clinics separately from antenatal and postnatal care. Our study found that only 21.8% of pregnant women visited ANC clinics three or more times during their current pregnancy, well below the WHO guidelines adopted by South Sudan, which recommended eight ANC contacts through pregnancy [19]. Pregnant women living with HIV who attended only one ANC visit were 20% less likely to interrupt treatment compared to pregnant women who attended three or more ANC visits during their current pregnancy. Although this finding was unexpected, a possible explanation is that the low number of ANC visits among pregnant women on ART and the lack of alignment between ANC and ART clinic appointments observed during follow-up visits, PBFW in this study, are possibly choosing to prioritize ART visits over ANC visits, given the constraints of attending both. In clinics, half of the women in this analysis only attended one ANC visit, promoting health education and the importance of both ART and ANC visits. Reaching women who do not access the health system through community engagement and programming may improve their access to healthcare services. Aligning HIV clinic dates with ANC visit dates and fully integrating ANC and PVT services can help increase attendance at both clinics.
Despite efforts to reduce maternal and child mortality through the promotion of facility-based delivery by skilled attendants [19], many women in South Sudan deliver their babies at home. The United Nations cooperation framework estimates indicate that 87% of deliveries in South Sudan occur at home, and a 2020 household survey in South Sudan estimated that 58% of women gave birth at home during their last pregnancy [12]. While the home delivery rate for women living with HIV in our study was high at 23.6%, it is lower than previous estimates for the general population of pregnant women in South Sudan. In our study, home delivery was associated with IIT among pregnant women. These findings support focusing interventions on women who say they may not give birth in a health facility or who have in the past given birth at home. Interventions that may be helpful include education around the benefits of facility delivery, addressing access barriers, like transportation, to general antenatal care, and ensuring continuity in HIV care for pregnant women in South Sudan.
This is one of the few studies to evaluate MMD in pregnant women, as most studies exclude pregnant women with MMD from their analysis. A survey conducted in the general population of South Sudan found that providing 3–6 months of MMD was feasible and supported client retention (Kieran Hartsough HA, Shambel, Aragaw FB, Altaye Kidane, Onyekachi, Ukaejiofo HS, Semira M, Najohapa J: SMS: Rapid Expansion of Multi Month Dispensing to Support Retention of People Living with HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy during the COVID 19 Pandemic in South Sudan, unpublished). Another study in the general population in Zambia and Malawi found that retention in care at 12 months (defined as less than 60 consecutive days without ART) was non-inferior for people who received ≥ 6 MMD, compared to 3 MMD and no MMD (Kieran Hartsough HA, Shambel, Aragaw FB, Altaye Kidane, Onyekachi, Ukaejiofo HS, Semira M, Najohapa J: SMS: Rapid Expansion of Multi Month Dispensing to Support Retention of People Living with HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy during the COVID 19 Pandemic in South Sudan, unpublished) [20]. South Sudan’s national guidelines do support MMD for pregnant women, given the political instability, conflict, and severe droughts and floods. In our study, most pregnant women (59.8%) were given ≥ 6 months of MMD during their first follow-up visit. Those who received less than 3 months of MMD were 1.6 times more likely to experience interruption in treatment compared to those who received 6 or more months of MMD. This supports the continued use of MMD for pregnant women for at least 6 months, particularly in conflict and environmental disaster zones. In these areas, women may face challenges attending clinic appointments, making it crucial for them to have access to their medication for an extended period. In South Sudan, the ANC appointments are separate from the ART clinic appointments. This means that women who have received ≥ 6 months of MMD are not expected to come in for their ART refills before 6 months have passed. However, they are expected to have more frequent ANC appointments. Because ART appointments are not always scheduled on the same day as ANC appointments, receiving a ≥ 6-month MMD reduces additional transportation costs and clinic waiting time. When the ANC and ART appointments are scheduled on the same day, women would still need to wait in two separate queues. Receiving a ≥ 6-month MMD can save clients time and money.
While other studies have found a significant association between client residence and IIT [21–23], ours did not. In our study, approximately one-third of women from each of the three areas (urban, peri-urban, and rural) reported IIT. This may be attributed to the classification of geographical areas. For instance, in South Sudan, there are no major differences between rural and peri-urban areas in terms of health infrastructure and health service delivery. However, transportation issues may be present in all areas and have been shown to contribute to IIT [24]. While previous studies in Africa have reported that age (younger and older age groups) is associated with treatment interruption [9, 16, 24–26], we did not find any association with these factors. Our study also did not align with previous findings that PBFW newly diagnosed with HIV are more likely to interrupt treatment [5, 27].
We acknowledge several study limitations. First, programmatic data sources from health facilities may contain missing and inaccurate data. To mitigate this, we used multiple data sources to identify the relevant variables from other data sources to determine if they were missing from one data source. Second, we calculated MMD by using a proxy based on appointment dates: the number of days between the date of the initial visit and the date of the follow-up visit. This was done with the assumption that the prescriber gave a follow-up appointment date based on the amount of medication prescribed. Third, some transfers to other facilities may not have been correctly recorded and may have been misclassified as IIT. Fourth, the data analysis did not include a longitudinal component to assess multiple instances of IIT. Fifth, The South Sudan national treatment guideline recommends 6-month MMD for all adult clients regardless of whether the patients are stable. Persons who are given a shorter duration of MMD may be those at higher risk of IIT, either judged by a clinician, or they may be at risk for other reasons, such as Advanced HIV Disease (AHD) and the need for frequent monitoring of their viral load. However, PBFW given at least 6 moths of MMD faired no worse, thus MMD is not a risk factor for IIT in the context of South. Sixth, all the facilities included in this study were supported by PEPFAR and had same standards of care and support levels. However, differences did exist particularly between urban and rural settings. Due to the nature of the data, we did not include this information in the analysis. Finally, this study is not generalizable beyond the context of South Sudan.
Conclusion
Despite significant investment in rapid ART initiation for PBFW and PVT services, interruption in treatment among PBFW on ART remains a challenge in South Sudan. Over one-third of PBFW on ART had IIT in our study. Delivery of an infant at home and receiving fewer months of ARV medications were significantly associated with IIT, while women who attended only one ANC visit were less likely to interrupt treatment. Integration of ANC and ART services may improve continuity of HIV care and treatment and reduce the burden on women attending multiple appointments. The unique practice in South Sudan of prescribing six months of ART for PBFW seemed protective of IIT. While there are data limitations, this indicates that longer MMD for PBFW may be an effective option for other countries facing similar barriers. Further work should focus on exploring interventions that enhance community engagement and increase demand for antenatal care, such as client tracing through the mentor-mothers, and community outreach volunteers to support adherence to ART appointments. In addition, future studies should evaluate viral load suppression and outcomes for HIV-exposed infants in relation to MMD. Addressing both health system and community-level barriers with context-adapted strategies, such as MMD, integrated ANC and ART services, and strengthened community-based support, could be essential for improving retention and reducing treatment interruption among pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV in South Sudan.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Data Used to replicate findings in the manuscript (XLSX 680 kb).
Additional file 2: Data Abstraction form (docx 21 kb).
Acknowledgements
We thank the management of South Sudan MOH department of HIV/AIDS and STI for the unwavering leadership and guidance support to facilitate the process of protocol review and ethical approval of the study protocol. We greatly appreciate and acknowledge the technical support rendered by the HIV/TB field officers, the leadership of IntraHealth International strategic information branch for the technical support provided during planning and implementation. We thank the healthcare workers and the research assistants who participated in the study. We acknowledge all the women living with HIV in South Sudan.
Disclaimer
The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agencies.
Abbreviations
- ANC
antenatal care
- ART
antiretroviral therapy
- CDC
U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- DGHT
Division on Global HIV and Tuberculosis
- IIT
Interruption in Treatment
- MMD
Multi-month dispensing
- PBFW
Pregnant and breastfeeding women
- PEPFAR
U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
- PVT
Prevention of Vertical Transmission
- WHO
World Health Organization
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualized the study and designed the Study proposal: SO, AB, SA, AA, MM. Conducted field data abstractions and compilation: SA AA. Conducted Data analysis and interpretation of results: SO, EC. Wrote the paper: SO, AB, MM, EC. Contributed to interpretation of data for substantial intellectual content: AB, MM, MS, EC, KB, AB, SB. Drafted and revised the manuscript: SO, AB, MM, MS, EC, KB. All authors read and approved the final version of manuscript.
Funding
The Authors didn’t receive any research grant from any institution.
The data for this research was generated from program supported by the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the terms of Cooperative Agreement No 1 NU2GGH002032.”
Data availability
I have the raw data used to generate findings for this research article.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This was a secondary data analysis and therefore, consent to participate was waived by the South Sudan national Ministry of Health research ethics review board (MOH-RERB). Ethical approval was obtained for the application form, protocol and supporting documents which complied with the conditions and principles established by the South Sudan National Guidelines and International Guidelines such as Helsinki Declaration for carrying out research involving humans as research subjects. Additional ethical approval was obtained from the Division of Global HIV and TB, Center for Global Health, CDC in Atlanta. † 45 C.F.R. part 46, 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. Sect. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. Sect. 552a; 44 U.S.C. Sect. 3501 et seq.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.https://aidsinfo.unaids.org/
- 2.Cooper ER, Charurat M, Mofenson L, Hanson CI, Pitt J, Diaz C, Hayani K, Handelsman E, Smeriglio V, Hoff R. Combination antiretroviral strategies for the treatment of pregnant HIV-1-infected women and prevention of perinatal HIV-1 transmission. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;29(5):484–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Haas AD, Msukwa MT, Egger M, Tenthani L, Tweya H, Jahn A, Gadabu OJ, Tal K, Salazar-Vizcaya L, Estill J. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy during and after pregnancy: cohort study on women receiving care in Malawi’s option B+ program. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(9):1227–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sikazwe I, Eshun-Wilson I, Sikombe K, Czaicki N, Somwe P, Mody A, Simbeza S, Glidden DV, Chizema E, Mulenga LB. Retention and viral suppression in a cohort of HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy in Zambia: Regionally representative estimates using a multistage-sampling-based approach. PLoS Med. 2019;16(5):e1002811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Knettel BA, Cichowitz C, Ngocho JS, Knippler ET, Chumba LN, Mmbaga BT, Watt MH. Retention in HIV care during pregnancy and the postpartum period in the Option B + era: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999). 2018:77(5);427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cichowitz C, Mazuguni F, Minja L, Njau P, Antelman G, Ngocho J, Knettel BA, Watt MH, Mmbaga BT. Vulnerable at each step in the PMTCT care cascade: high loss to follow up during pregnancy and the postpartum period in Tanzania. AIDS Behav. 2019;23:1824–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hoffman RM, Phiri K, Parent J, Grotts J, Elashoff D, Kawale P, Yeatman S, Currier JS, Schooley A. Factors associated with retention in Option B + in Malawi: a case control study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(1):21464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tweya H, Gugsa S, Hosseinipour M, Speight C, Ng’ambi W, Bokosi M, Chikonda J, Chauma A, Khomani P, Phoso M. Understanding factors, outcomes and reasons for loss to follow-up among women in O ption B+ PMTCT programme in L ilongwe, M alawi. Tropical Med Int Health. 2014;19(11):1360–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mitiku I, Arefayne M, Mesfin Y, Gizaw M. Factors associated with loss to follow-up among women in Option B+ PMTCT programme in northeast Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(1):20662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/southsudan
- 11.https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/neonatal-mortality/
- 12.https://www.elrha.org/resource/lqas-household-survey-report
- 13.https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/antenatal-care/
- 14.Organization WH. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: recommendations for a public health approach. World Health Organization; 2021. [PubMed]
- 15.https://www.differentiatedservicedelivery.org/wp-content/uploads/South-Sudan_2017-2.pdf Consolidated clinical guidelines on use of antiretroviral drugs for hi treatment and prevention.
- 16.Woldesenbet S, Jackson D, Lombard C, Dinh T-H, Puren A, Sherman G, Ramokolo V, Doherty T, Mogashoa M, Bhardwaj S. Missed opportunities along the prevention of mother-to-child transmission services cascade in South Africa: uptake, determinants, and attributable risk (the SAPMTCTE). PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tolossa T, Kassa GM, Chanie H, Abajobir A, Mulisa D. Incidence and predictors of lost to follow-up among women under option B+ PMTCT program in western Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kiwanuka G, Kiwanuka N, Muneza F, Nabirye J, Oporia F, Odikro MA, Castelnuovo B, Wanyenze RK. Retention of HIV infected pregnant and breastfeeding women on option B + in Gomba District, Uganda: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/mca-documents/qoc/quality-of-care/standards-for-improving-quality-of-maternal-and-newborn-care-in-health-facilities_1a22426e-fdd0-42b4-95b2-4b5b9c590d76.pdf?sfvrsn=3b364d8_4.%202016
- 20.Hoffman RM, Moyo C, Balakasi KT, Siwale Z, Hubbard J, Bardon A, Fox MP, Kakwesa G, Kalua T, Nyasa-Haambokoma M. Multimonth dispensing of up to 6 months of antiretroviral therapy in Malawi and Zambia (INTERVAL): a cluster-randomised, non-blinded, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(5):e628–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kiirya Y, Musoke P, Obeng-Amoako GAO, Kalyango J. Loss to follow up after pregnancy among mothers enrolled on the option B+ program in Uganda. Public Health Pract. 2021;2:100085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grimsrud A, Lesosky M, Kalombo C, Bekker L-G, Myer L. Implementation and operational research: community-based adherence clubs for the management of stable antiretroviral therapy patients in Cape Town, South Africa: a cohort study. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;71(1):e16–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Geldsetzer P, Yapa HMN, Vaikath M, Ogbuoji O, Fox MP, Essajee SM, Negussie EK, Bärnighausen T. A systematic review of interventions to improve postpartum retention of women in PMTCT and ART care. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(1):20679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Frijters EM, Hermans LE, Wensing AM, Devillé WL, Tempelman HA, De Wit JB. Risk factors for loss to follow-up from antiretroviral therapy programmes in low-income and middle-income countries. Aids. 2020;34(9):1261–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hodgson I, Plummer ML, Konopka SN, Colvin CJ, Jonas E, Albertini J, Amzel A, Fogg KP. A systematic review of individual and contextual factors affecting ART initiation, adherence, and retention for HIV-infected pregnant and postpartum women. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e111421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kirsten I, Sewangi J, Kunz A, Dugange F, Ziske J, Jordan-Harder B, Harms G, Theuring S. Adherence to combination prophylaxis for prevention of mother-to-child-transmission of HIV in Tanzania. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6):e21020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Erlwanger AS, Joseph J, Gotora T, Muzunze B, Orne-Gliemann J, Mukungunugwa S, Farley T, Mangwiro A-Z. Patterns of HIV care clinic attendance and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV in the context of Option B + in Zimbabwe. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75:S198–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1: Data Used to replicate findings in the manuscript (XLSX 680 kb).
Additional file 2: Data Abstraction form (docx 21 kb).
Data Availability Statement
I have the raw data used to generate findings for this research article.
