Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Apr 4;16:16227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-46925-9

Liver transcriptome dynamics in Holstein cows during the periparturient transition

Nayan Bhowmik 1, Mariana da Silva 2, Alejandro Castaneda 3, Asha M Miles 1,4, Congjun Li 1, Curtis P Van Tassell 1, Ransom L Baldwin VI 1, J Eduardo Rico 3, George E Liu 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13201770  PMID: 41935099

Abstract

During the periparturient phase, dairy cows undergo profound physiological, metabolic, and immunological changes that affect their health, productivity, and reproductive efficiency, with the liver playing a central role in adaptation. In this study, liver transcriptomic changes were assessed in six multiparous Holstein cows by targeting samples approximately 21 d before expected calving date (D-21) and 7 d after calving (D+7) using RNA sequencing. A total of 198 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between D-21 and D+7 (140 upregulated and 58 downregulated) using |log2[fold-change (FC)]|> 1 and a Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted P-value < 0.05. At D+7, genes associated with lipid handling, energy metabolism, gluconeogenesis, and cell division were activated, reflecting the elevated energy demands of early lactation. In contrast, genes involved in glycogen, polysaccharide, and ketone metabolism were repressed, indicating metabolic prioritization of energy production overgrowth and storage. KEGG pathway analysis revealed activation of endocrine, digestive, and metabolic pathways, while the p53 signaling pathway controlling the cell cycle and DNA damage response was downregulated, likely promoting cell survival and adaptation. Co-expression network analysis further confirmed activation of these biological processes and pathways. In conclusion, these findings provide insights into liver transcriptomic adaptations that enable periparturient Holstein cows to meet the heightened metabolic demands of early lactation, offering potential targets for improving health and productivity during this critical period.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-46925-9.

Keywords: Gene expression, Holstein, Periparturient period, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA)

Subject terms: Genetics, Molecular biology, Physiology

Introduction

The period surrounding calving, specifically three weeks before to three weeks after, is one of the most critical times for highly productive dairy cows. The periparturient period has a significant impact on the health, production, and reproduction of cows and their calves. During this transition phase, cows face significant physiological, metabolic, and immunological challenges. Immunosuppression due to negative energy balance around calving can make cows more susceptible to periparturient infectious diseases and metabolic disorders1. These conditions can adversely affect the following lactation and increase the risk of mortality. Furthermore, negative energy balance (NEB) and excessive fat mobilization driven by increased energy demands for fetal growth and milk production, concomitant with reduced feed intake, can lead to increased oxidative stress. Oxidative stress, in turn, compromises the immune system, heightening the risk of infectious diseases in dairy cattle2. The intense breakdown of adipose tissue releases free non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) and oxylipids into the bloodstream, which influence inflammatory responses3. Moreover, excessive mobilization of fat and muscle tissue, particularly in the form of NEFA and glucogenic amino acids, during this period negatively affects reproductive performance in dairy cattle4. Several hormonal changes occur during this period, including changes in glucocorticoids and reproductive steroids (e.g., increased cortisol around calving, a sharp decline in progesterone before calving, and rising estradiol approaching parturition), together with changes in insulin dynamics and insulin sensitivity, and the periparturient steroid milieu also comprises additional steroid classes, including androgens, as characterized in targeted steroid profiling studies5–10. Additionally, there is a decrease in insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) after parturition9. Together, these hormonal shifts significantly influence the metabolic state and overall health of dairy cows. Consequently, understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing effective management and nutritional strategies that mitigate health risks, optimize performance, and enhance the resilience of dairy cows during this critical period.

The liver plays a central role in regulating various metabolic processes, including gluconeogenesis, energy production, lipid and fatty acid metabolism, hormone regulation, stress responses, and inflammatory pathways. During this transition period, the liver is responsible for producing glucose from propionate, lactate, and glucogenic amino acids through gluconeogenesis11. Additionally, the liver receives a significant influx of NEFA from mobilized body fat, which leads to liver oxidative metabolism to meet the increased energy demands associated with milk production12. During periods of NEB and nutritional deficiency, the expression of the liver’s growth hormone receptor (GHR) is reduced, resulting in decreased synthesis of IGF-1 by the liver, which impacts growth and metabolic regulation13. The liver can also experience endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress due to cellular stress, which may trigger the unfolded protein response to restore proper protein folding and function. This response contributes to conditions such as fatty liver or ketosis14. Furthermore, cytokines and acute-phase proteins that mediate inflammatory responses in the liver are essential for the metabolic adaptations that occur during this period15.

Several studies have previously analyzed liver biopsy data using microarrays or RNA sequencing to explore the impact of various factors on liver metabolism in periparturient dairy cows. These factors include rumen-protected niacin, nicotinamide, and choline supplementation during the periparturient period16,17, dietary phosphorus deprivation during the last 4 weeks of the dry period18, subacute ruminal acidosis during the periparturient period19, body condition score, and feeding management during the prepartum period20. Earlier studies have focused on the impact of dietary energy, parity, and age of cows on changes in liver transcriptomes21–23. While previous liver transcriptomic studies have examined the transition period in dairy cows, many have used limited sampling windows and focused primarily on differential expressions. Here, we characterized liver gene-expression changes in U.S. Holstein cows using biopsies collected 21 d prior to expected calving date and 7 d after calving under a clearly defined management and dietary context. We employed a complementary analytical framework combining DESeq2-based differential expression with Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to identify both individual differentially expressed genes and coordinated gene co-expression modules associated with the periparturient transition. It is important to note that genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions are well documented in dairy cattle and can influence biological and performance responses across various production settings. As such, transcriptomic signatures identified under one set of environmental conditions may not directly apply to another context24–26. Therefore, we aimed to profile liver transcriptomic differences between D−21 and D+7 in U.S. Holstein cows and to identify gene- and network-level patterns associated with the periparturient transition that can be prioritized for validation in future studies.

Materials and methods

Animals and management

The animal study was conducted at the USDA ARS Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) dairy unit in Beltsville, MD. The animal study protocol was approved by the BARC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, #AUP-22-01). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, and all methods are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org). Liver biopsies were collected from six multiparous (four 2nd lactation cows, one 3rd lactation, and one 4th lactation cow) Holstein cows with a prior mean milk production of 12,304 ± 1430 kg 305 d corrected milk with 4.05 fat and 3.1 protein yields. Liver biopsy sampling targeted 21 d before expected calving date (D-21; 14.8 ± 4.6 d actual prior to calving) and 7 d after calving (D+7; 8.5 ± 1.6 d actual post calving; Fig. 1a). The cows were housed in a ventilated, enclosed freestall barn, where veterinarians and staff daily monitored their health status during the transition period. Recorded health observations included clinical signs of metabolic or infectious disorders (e.g., ketosis, milk fever, mastitis), as well as general indicators of well-being. During the non-lactating phase, cows were maintained on a dry period total mixed ration (TMR) balanced according to NASEM (2021) guidelines27 to ensure appropriate nutrient intake during the late gestation (Table 1). Each cow received this specific ration for an average period of 51.3 ± 8.3 d prior to calving. Upon entering the lactation cycle after parturition, the cows were immediately transitioned onto a new lactation TMR specifically optimized for lactating dairy cows, similarly developed in accordance with the NASEM (2021) standards27 to support the metabolic demands of early milk production. Table 1 presents the dietary composition, including ingredient inclusion levels on both an as-fed and dry matter (DM) basis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Experimental design. (a) Experimental flow chart. (b) Data analysis workflow.

Table 1.

Total mixed rations supplied to cows during the dry and lactating period.

Ingredient As Fed1 DM Fed2
kg/hd3 % of ration4 kg/hd % of ration
Dry period
 Dry cow concentrate5 2.92 7.16 2.59 15.89
 BMR CS6 21.53 52.73 6.46 39.55
 Wheat straw 4.93 12.08 4.54 27.78
 Triticale 8.84 21.65 2.74 16.78
 Water 2.61 6.39 0 0
Lactating period
 Milk cow prebatch 18.74 34.55 16.33 65.45
  Milk cow concentrate7 13.53 70.27 11.91 70.95
  Wheat straw 0.89 4.61 0.82 4.86
  Grass hay 0.56 2.93 0.51 3.03
  Alfalfa 0.57 2.96 0.51 3.05
  Cotton seed 2/23 1.36 7.07 1.22 7.30
  Citrus pulp 2/23 1.36 7.07 1.22 7.30
  Beltsville blend 0.98 5.10 0.59 3.51
 BMR CS 22.68 41.82 6.80 27.27
 Triticale 5.85 10.79 1.81 7.27
 Water 6.96 12.84 0.00 0.00

1As Fed refers to the weight of feed offered in its natural moisture state.

2DM Fed denotes the corresponding dry-matter basis.

3 kg/hd denotes kilograms per head per day.

4% of ration values are calculated based on the proportion of total dietary dry matter contributed by each ingredient. The reported values represent formulated rations rather than individually measured intake.

5Dry Cow Concentrate – Formulated to meet or exceed dry cow nutrient requirements with a body weight of 581 kg and body condition score of 3.0, following NASEM (2021) guidelines27.

6BMR CS – Brown Mid Rib Corn Silage.

7Milk Cow Concentrate – Formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements of a 2nd lactation Holstein cow weighing 600 kg with a body condition score of 2.5, producing 41 kg milk, following NASEM (2021) guidelines27.

Liver biopsy sample collection

After brushing, clipping, and cleaning the biopsy site ~ 9 cm below the spinal processes on the right lateral of the cow, the area was anesthetized with lidocaine. A 1 to 2 cm incision was made in the 10th intercostal space, and biopsies (~ 1 to 2 g) were obtained by introducing a sterile stainless-steel trocar with a cannula through the incision. The biopsy samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C until they could be shipped for RNA extraction.

RNA isolation, library construction, and sequencing

All frozen liver tissue samples (n = 12) were shipped to Dante Labs Inc. for RNA extraction and sequencing. Total RNA was extracted from liver tissue by the sequencing service provider (Dante Genomics) as part of the contracted RNA-seq service, according to the provider’s internal standard protocols. While the specific extraction chemistry/kit is not detailed in their public submission documentation, Dante Genomics indicates that they apply extensive sample quality-control procedures for downstream processing. RNA quantity was assessed using spectrophotometry, and RNA integrity was evaluated using an automated electrophoresis system. All samples met sequencing quality thresholds, and the corresponding quality metrics (e.g., RNA integrity values and concentration ranges) were within acceptable ranges. After verifying the quality and quantity of the RNA, libraries for each tissue sample were prepared using the Illumina Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit. Each library was sequenced to produce at least 6.5 Gb of RNA-seq data using an Illumina NovaSeq 2 × 150 bp platform.

Pre-processing of RNA sequence data

After receiving the raw FASTQ files from Dante Labs, the quality of each sample was assessed using FastQC (Fig. S2; https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/, last accessed on January 5, 2025). The data analysis workflow is provided in Fig. 1b. Poor-quality reads and adapter sequences were trimmed using Trimmomatic software v.0.3928 with the following parameters: ILLUMINACLIP:TruSeq3-PE.fa:2:30:10, LEADING:3, TRAILING:3, SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15, and MINLEN:36. The trimmed reads were then aligned to the Bos taurus reference genome assembly ARS-UCD2.0 using the STAR aligner v.2.7.11b29 with default settings.

Differential gene expression analysis

The featureCounts program from the Subread package was utilized to generate gene-level read counts from the aligned RNA-seq data30. Counts per million (CPM) values were calculated from the raw integer counts using the edgeR framework solely for low-expression filtering and were not used as input for differential expression analysis. Genes with CPM greater than one in at least two samples were retained for analysis.

Differential gene expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2 version 1.44.0 in R31, which models raw count data using negative binomial generalized linear models. Because the same animals were sampled at two time points, a paired experimental design was implemented by including cow identity as a blocking factor. The DESeq2 model was specified as follows:

graphic file with name d33e700.gif

where timepoint represented prepartum day −21 and postpartum day +7. Only cows with complete paired samples at both time points were included in the statistical analysis; one sample was excluded because the corresponding animal lacked a matched sample at the alternate time point, which precludes valid paired inference when cow identity is included as a blocking factor. Differential expressions were assessed using a Wald test, and results were summarized for the contrast of postpartum day +7 versus prepartum day −21. Genes with an adjusted P value (Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate) ≤ 0.05 and an absolute log2 fold change > 1 were considered differentially expressed. A Volcano plot was generated using the ggplot2 package in R to illustrate the up- and down-regulated DEGs.

The normalization of the count data was performed using DESeq2, which calculates the ratio of each sample’s counts to those of a pseudo-reference sample, defined as the geometric mean across all samples. The median of this ratio for each sample serves as the size or normalization factor for that sample. The normalized counts are obtained by dividing the raw counts of each sample by its corresponding size factor. Normalized counts were used to conduct principal component analysis (PCA) for evaluating global transcriptional patterns and sample clustering across time points, with visualization performed using the ggplot2 package32 in R.

The identified DEGs were further investigated for gene ontology (GO) term enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses using PANTHER33 and the “enrichKEGG” function of the clusterProfiler package34 in R, respectively. PANTHER maps submitted genes to UniProtKB representative protein IDs, so gene counts for enriched terms reflect these mapped IDs, not the original gene symbols.

Co-expression network analysis

The raw count data obtained from featureCounts for both stages (D-21 and D+7) were used to identify co-expressed functional gene modules using the WGCNA v.1.7335. Genes with counts below 15 in more than 75% of the samples were excluded from the analysis, as these low-expressed features tend to reflect noise, and correlations based on counts that are mostly zero are not meaningful. The variance stabilization method was applied to obtain normalized counts. Analysis of scale-free topology was conducted using the normalized counts to determine the appropriate soft-thresholding power for network construction. A desired minimum scale-free topology fitting index (R2), along with a low mean connectivity, was used to identify this power. The automatic network was then constructed in a block-wise manner using the normalized counts and identified power to detect modules. A dendrogram was generated to visualize the modules before and after merging, utilizing the “plotDendroAndColors” function within WGCNA. The module-trait correlation coefficients were calculated using the “cor” function from the stats package in R. The correlation P-values for each module were adjusted using the false discovery rate (FDR), and modules with FDR-corrected P-values of ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. A heatmap plot of module-trait relationships was created using the “labeledHeatmap” function.

The genes from the significant modules were extracted to perform GO term enrichment and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses, employing PANTHER33 and the “enrichKEGG” function of the clusterProfiler package34 in R, respectively.

Results

Quality control and mapping of raw reads

The maximum read length for the raw RNA sequence data was 150 base pairs (bp) in a paired-end format. The original RNA-seq raw data from 12 samples underwent quality assessment, revealing an average of 35,455,451 raw reads (Table S1). The average percentages of unique and duplicate reads were 14.55% (ranging from 5.07 to 29.12%) and 85.45% (ranging from 70.88 to 94.93%), respectively. The average Phred quality score across each base position in the 150 bp raw reads was 36.29. Additionally, the average percentages of raw reads with Q20 and Q30 scores were 99.34 and 85.82%, respectively. The average GC content across all samples was 71% (Table S1).

Quality checking also identified the presence of Illumina sequence adapters in some samples. To address this, Trimmomatic was employed to filter the raw reads for quality and adapter content. A total of 31,911,712 clean reads were obtained, indicating that 90.27% of the reads passed the quality control step (Table S1). The clean reads contained an average of 14.09% (with a range of 4.92 to 29.28%) unique reads and 85.91% (ranging from 70.72 to 95.08%) duplicate reads. The average Phred quality score across each base position in the clean reads increased by 3.81% compared to the raw reads. Furthermore, the average percentage of clean reads with a Q30 score rose substantially to 95.36%, reflecting an increase of 11.12% compared to the raw reads, while the percentage of clean reads with a Q20 score increased by 0.66%. The average GC content in the clean reads was 70% across all samples.

These clean reads were subsequently mapped to the Bos taurus ARS-UCD2.0 reference genome assembly. The overall average mapping rate across 11 samples was 93.21% (Table S2). Of the clean reads, 78.68% mapped to unique locations in the genome, while 14.53% mapped to multiple genomic locations. Notably, one sample had a significantly lower mapping rate of 30.36%, with only 27.62% of its reads uniquely mapped and 2.74% mapping to multiple genomic locations, which was excluded from further analysis. The percentage of reads uniquely mapped to the cattle reference genome ranged from 73.32 to 84.46%. Only uniquely mapped reads and those assigned to annotated regions of the cattle genome were used for downstream analysis.

Principal component analysis

Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted using count data that were normalized through a variance stabilizing transformation (VST) method. This analysis aimed to explore the relationships both within and between groups of samples. Principal Component 1 (PC1) accounts for 34% of the variation, while Principal Component 2 (PC2) represents 23%. Both PC1 and PC2 collectively distinguish cows at 7 days post-calving from those at 21 days pre-calving (Fig. S1). The lowly mapped sample and the respective unpaired sample were not shown in the PCA plot (Fig. S1).

Differentially expressed genes between D-21 and D+7 cows

A total of 22,914 genes with non-zero counts were detected from all samples. After applying a filter for counts per million (CPM) reads greater than one in at least two samples, 13,193 genes were retained for differential gene expression analysis. In total, 198 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between the cows at day −21 pre-calving (D-21) and day +7 post-calving (D+7), with an adjusted P-value of ≤ 0.05 and a |log2FC| of ≥ 1. Among these, 140 genes were upregulated, and 58 genes were downregulated in the cows at day +7 after calving (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Volcano plot illustrating differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the liver between 7 days post-calving and 21 days pre-calving.

Table 2 displays the top 10 upregulated and downregulated genes observed between D+7 and D˗21. A detailed list of DEGs between the pre- and post-partum periods is presented in Table S3. Among the top ten downregulated genes, one is categorized as uncharacterized and shows a significant log2-fold change. The top upregulated genes are primarily linked to lipid metabolism and transport, including lipoprotein metabolism and fatty acid/PUFA uptake (APOA1, MFSD2A, APOA4, and ANGPTL4), energy metabolism (PDK4), amino acid metabolism (HAL), mitochondrial solute transport (SLC25A30), gluconeogenesis (PC), cell cycle/mitosis (CENPF), and muscle structure (MYOM1). Conversely, the top-downregulated genes are involved in carbohydrate metabolism, including glycogen metabolism (PPP1R3B, PPP1R3C), innate immunity and defense (CGN1), endocrine/vitamin transport (TTR), cell signaling (RAP2C), cell adhesion and cell–matrix interactions (FREM3), receptor/neural-associated signaling (RTN4RL1), and translation (TRNASTOP-UCA).

Table 2.

Top DEGs in liver at day +7 post-calving vs day -21 pre-calving, ranked by ascending adjusted P-value.

Gene name Gene symbol Log2 fold change P-value Adjusted
P-value
Upregulated
 Apolipoprotein A1 APOA1 +2.91 3.59 × 10–31 4.74 × 10–27
 Solute carrier family 25 member 30 SLC25A30 +2.34 3.94 × 10–20 2.60 × 10–16
 Major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 2A MFSD2A +3.67 6.05 × 10–16 1.60 × 10–12
 Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 PDK4 +1.62 1.09 × 10–15 2.41 × 10–12
 Apolipoprotein A4 APOA4 +2.42 3.28 × 10–15 5.69 × 10–12
 Pyruvate carboxylase PC +1.54 3.45 × 10–15 5.69 × 10–12
 Angiopoietin-like 4 ANGPTL4 +2.48 1.93 × 10–13 2.83 × 10–10
 Centromere protein F CENPF +3.42 5.61 × 10–13 7.40 × 10–10
 Myomesin 1 MYOM1 +1.69 1.92 × 10–12 2.30 × 10–09
 Histidine ammonia-lyase HAL +1.49 5.32 × 10–11 5.40 × 10–08
Downregulated
 Conglutinin CGN1  − 2.74 7.71 × 10–19 3.39 × 10–15
 Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3C PPP1R3C  − 2.20 1.28 × 10–16 4.23 × 10–13
 Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B PPP1R3B  − 1.49 5.06 × 10–11 5.40 × 10–08
 Uncharacterized LOC112443470 LOC112443470  − 2.15 8.58 × 10–09 4.03 × 10–06
 FRAS1-related extracellular matrix protein 3-like LOC100337185  − 2.27 9.21 × 10–08 3.28 × 10–05
 Transfer RNA opal suppressor TRNASTOP-UCA  − 2.06 2.16 × 10–07 7.19 × 10–05
 RAP2C, member of RAS oncogene family RAP2C  − 1.06 6.97 × 10–07 1.77 × 10–04
 Reticulon 4 receptor like 1 RTN4RL1  − 2.37 8.75 × 10–07 2.02 × 10–04
 Cortexin domain containing 1 CTXND1  − 1.27 2.41 × 10–06 4.42 × 10–04
 Transthyretin TTR  − 1.18 3.31 × 10–06 5.79 × 10–04

Gene ontology analysis of DEGs

We conducted GO enrichment analysis of up- and down-regulated genes separately using PANTHER to gain insights into their biological functions. For the up-regulated DEGs, we identified 122 enriched GO terms, which included only GO terms associated with at least 3 observed gene counts. These GO terms consist of 94 biological processes (BP), 7 molecular functions (MF), and 21 cellular components (CC), as shown in Table S4. Figure 3 illustrates the top 35 GO-enriched biological processes for upregulated genes. Based on GO term definitions, approximately 45.71% of these top biological processes were associated with lipid metabolism/lipid homeostasis/lipoprotein organization. Additionally, 22.86% of the top GO-enriched biological processes were related to cell division and chromosome segregation. About 25.71% of them were linked to general intermediary metabolism. The biological processes directly related to ketone metabolism and digestive system function were also enriched. The biological process “lipid metabolic process” had a fold enrichment score of 4.56 and contained 24 upregulated DEGs (MGLL, ABCA4, PCK1, ASPG, ABHD1, APOA1, CYP4A59, CYP7A1, ACADVL, GK, LPIN1, APOC2, LIPG, PC, ELOVL5, LEPR, FDFT1, CPT1B, LOC112449293, CYP11A1, APOA4, PLCD4, SOAT2, and ANGPTL4). Moreover, the “sterol homeostasis” biological process had an enrichment score of 15.03 and included six upregulated genes (APOA1, CYP7A1, LIPG, HSDL2, APOA4, and SOAT2).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Top 35 enriched GO biological process (BP) terms for the upregulated genes.

A total of 58 downregulated genes were analyzed, resulting in the enrichment of 27 GO terms: 21 BP, 2 MF, and 4 CC, as presented in Table S5. The 21 enriched GO BP terms for the downregulated genes are presented in Fig. 4. The GO enrichment of downregulated genes highlighted processes involving i) regulation of metabolism, including carbohydrate/polysaccharide (glycogen/glucan) metabolic regulation (23.21% of enriched BP terms), ketone metabolic regulation, precursor-metabolite/energy-generation regulation; ii) cell communication/signaling and signal-transduction regulation (28.57%); iii) regulation of cell population proliferation; and iv) responses to stress (abiotic stimulus and ischemia), alongside an ovulation-cycle term. The biological process term “regulation of the glycogen metabolic process” had an enrichment score of 52.00 and was linked to three DEGs, namely PPP1R3C, PPP1R3B, and IGF1.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Enriched GO biological process (BP) terms for the downregulated genes.

KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs

The KEGG pathway analysis was performed using both up-regulated and down-regulated genes to investigate the biological pathways affected during the D+7 period. The results of the pathway enrichment analysis are presented in Table 3, highlighting the most enriched pathways with a q-value of less than 0.05. A total of 14 KEGG pathways were identified for the up-regulated genes, while only one pathway was identified for the down-regulated genes. About 59% of the pathways enriched in the upregulated genes were related to metabolism (including carbohydrate, fat, and amino acid metabolism), 24% were associated with organismal systems (such as the endocrine and digestive systems), and 18% were linked to cellular processes (including cell growth and death, cell motility, transport, and catabolism). The three pathways with the highest enrichment scores – 13.45 for fatty acid degradation, 13.02 for the citrate cycle, and 12.01 for the PPAR signaling pathway – were associated with the metabolism of fat and carbohydrates. The pathways related to lipid metabolism included fatty acid degradation, fatty acid metabolism, cholesterol metabolism, peroxisome, and PPAR signaling pathways. For carbohydrate metabolism, the enriched pathways included the citrate cycle, pyruvate metabolism, propanoate metabolism, and glycolysis or gluconeogenesis. Additionally, glucagon and adipocytokine signaling pathways were also enriched. The digestion and absorption of vitamins were also identified. The pathway involving glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism is also upregulated at postpartum. The p53 signaling pathway, which regulates the cell cycle and DNA damage response, was downregulated at D+7.

Table 3.

List of KEGG pathways enriched in the up- and down-regulated genes.

ID Category Name Count Fold enrichment q-value Core enrichment genes
Upregulated
 bta03320 Endocrine system PPAR signaling pathway 9 16.50 3.91 × 10–07 APOA1, ANGPTL4, CPT1B, GK, CYP4A11, PCK1, RXRG, CYP4A59, CYP7A1
 bta04979 Digestive system Cholesterol metabolism 7 22.00 1.61 × 10–06 APOA1, APOA4, ANGPTL4, APOC2, LIPG, SOAT2, CYP7A1
 bta04922 Endocrine system Glucagon signaling pathway 7 10.47 1.88 × 10–04 CPT1B, LDHB, PPARGC1A, PCK1, CREB3L3, LDHA, GYS2
 bta04920 Endocrine system Adipocytokine signaling pathway 6 12.66 2.37 × 10–04 CPT1B, LEPR, PPARGC1A, PCK1, RXRG, ADIPOR2
 bta04152 Signal transduction AMPK signaling pathway 7 8.56 4.26 × 10–04 CPT1B, LEPR, PPARGC1A, PCK1, CREB3L3, ADIPOR2, GYS2
 bta00561 Lipid metabolism Glycerolipid metabolism 5 11.33 1.65 × 10–03 GK, LIPG, LPIN1, MGLL, LOC618076
 bta00071 Lipid metabolism Fatty acid degradation 4 13.69 3.24 × 10–03 CPT1B, ACADVL, CYP4A11, CYP4A59
 bta00620 Carbohydrate metabolism Pyruvate metabolism 4 13.69 3.24 × 10–03 PC, LDHB, PCK1, LDHA
 bta04931 Endocrine and metabolic disease Insulin resistance 5 7.00 1.04 × 10–02 CPT1B, PPARGC1A, PCK1, CREB3L3, GYS2
 bta00020 Carbohydrate metabolism Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) 3 14.91 1.35 × 10–02 PC, LOC132342072, PCK1
 bta00140 Lipid metabolism Steroid hormone biosynthesis 4 7.90 1.92 × 10–02 CYP11A1, UGT2B10, CYP7A1, LOC112449293
 bta04814 Cell motility Motor proteins 6 4.51 2.27 × 10–02 KIF4A, MYO7B, KIFC1, CENPE, KIF20A, KIF15
 bta04936 Endocrine and metabolic disease Alcoholic liver disease 5 4.87 3.58 × 10–02 CPT1B, ACADVL, PPARGC1A, LPIN1, ADIPOR2
 bta04975 Digestive system Fat digestion and absorption 3 9.06 4.07 × 10–02 APOA1, APOA4, LOC618076
Downregulated
 bta04115 Cell growth and death p53 signaling pathway 4 13.42 2.56 × 10–02 IGFBP3, SESN3, CDKN1A, IGF1

Gene co-expression network analysis

A co-expression network analysis was conducted using the WGCNA R package35 to identify groups of co-expressed genes (modules) that were expressed at different levels in cows seven days postpartum compared to their expression levels during the 21-day prepartum period. We constructed a scale-free co-expression gene network using the one-step network construction method. The network topology analysis was conducted using the “pickSoftThreshold” function. To identify the optimal power, we tested a range of soft threshold values and created two diagnostic plots: one displaying the relationship between power and the scale-free topology model fit (Signed R2) indices, and another showing the relationship between power and mean connectivity indices (Fig. 5a). The soft threshold power was chosen to strike a balance between the scale-free topology fit and mean connectivity. We determined that a power value of 20 achieved a higher Signed R2 (0.818) while maintaining a relatively low mean connectivity (113). This soft threshold value was then used to construct the network with the “blockwiseModules” function. A total of 22 co-expression modules were identified after merging closely related modules, specifically those with eigengenes that have over 80% similarity (r = 0.8; Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). (a) Power plot shows scale-free fit index and mean connectivity for various soft thresholding powers. The red line indicates the scale-free topology index value of 0.80. (b) Clustering dendrogram of genes with assigned merged and unmerged module colors. (c) Heatmap of module-trait association indicating correlations between module eigengenes (22) and periparturient stages, with FDR adjustment.

The module-trait association identified one significant module, labeled “red” (Padj = 0.006), out of a total of 22 modules (Fig. 5c). This red module contained 259 hub genes. The hub genes were subsequently used for GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analyses. The GO enrichment analysis identified 162 enriched GO terms, which included 113 BP, 33 MF, and 16 CC, as shown in Table S6. Figure 6 displays the top 35 biological process terms that are enriched in GO. The GO enrichment analysis, along with the significant WGCNA module, further confirmed the activation of biological processes identified with differential gene expression analyses. Approximately 40.00% of these terms were associated with fat metabolism, while 34.29% were linked to general intermediary metabolism, including organic acid/carboxylic acid/oxoacid metabolism. The BP terms involved in carbohydrate, phosphate/phosphorus, ketone, and alcohol metabolism are also enriched. We subsequently performed KEGG pathway enrichment analysis using the 259 hub genes identified in the significant red module from the co-expression network analysis to determine the biological pathways impacted at the 7-day postpartum period. A total of 10 KEGG pathways were activated during this transition in postpartum cows (Table 4). About 7 of these KEGG pathways were also enriched in the differential gene expression analysis. About 80% of these enriched KEGG pathways were associated with lipid metabolism.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Top 35 enriched GO biological process (BP) terms for the genes in the significant red module.

Table 4.

List of KEGG pathways enriched in the genes of the significant red module.

ID Category Name Count Fold enrichment q-value Core enrichment genes
bta03320 Endocrine system PPAR signaling pathway 14 11.57 2.61 × 10–09 EHHADH, ACADL, RXRG, HMGCS2, CPT2, CYP4A11, CYP4A59, ANGPTL4, SLC27A2, APOA1, NR1H3, ACSL1, CPT1A, GK
bta00071 Lipid metabolism Fatty acid degradation 9 13.88 1.34 × 10–06 EHHADH, ACADL, CPT2, CYP4A11, CYP4A59, HADHA, ACAA2, ACSL1, CPT1A
bta04979 Digestive system Cholesterol metabolism 8 11.33 3.15 × 10–05 SORT1, ANGPTL4, ABCA1, APOA4, APOA1, SCARB1, APOC2, MYLIP
bta01212 Global and overview maps Fatty acid metabolism 8 9.41 1.03 × 10–04 EHHADH, ACADL, CPT2, HADHA, ELOVL5, ACAA2, ACSL1, CPT1A
bta04146 Transport and catabolism Peroxisome 8 6.61 1.20 × 10–03 EHHADH, IDH1, ABCD3, DHRS4, SLC27A2, MLYCD, AMACR, ACSL1
bta04152 Signal transduction AMPK signaling pathway 9 4.96 2.65 × 10–03 LEPR, GYS2, ADIPOR2, PPARGC1A, CREB3L3, FBP1, AKT3, MLYCD, CPT1A
bta04920 Endocrine system Adipocytokine signaling pathway 7 6.66 2.65 × 10–03 RXRG, LEPR, ADIPOR2, PPARGC1A, AKT3, ACSL1, CPT1A
bta04931 Endocrine and metabolic disease Insulin resistance 8 5.05 5.13 × 10–03 GYS2, PPARGC1A, CREB3L3, SLC27A2, NR1H3, AKT3, PPP1R3C, CPT1A
bta04977 Digestive system Vitamin digestion and absorption 4 10.28 1.41 × 10–02 SLC19A3, APOA4, APOA1, SCARB1
bta04922 Endocrine system Glucagon signaling pathway 7 4.72 1.58 × 10–02 GYS2, PPARGC1A, CREB3L3, FBP1, SIK2, AKT3, CPT1A

Discussion

This study focuses on differentially expressed and co-expressed genes and their metabolic pathways in the liver of periparturient cows, utilizing liver biopsy sampling targeted 21 d before expected calving date (D-21; 14.8 ± 4.6 d actual prior to calving) and 7 d after calving (D+7; 8.5 ± 1.6 d actual post calving). During the dry period, cows were offered a total mixed ration (TMR) formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements for late-gestation cows as established by NASEM (2021)27. Upon calving, cows were transitioned to a high-production TMR formulated to meet nutrient requirements for early lactation, in accordance with NASEM (2021) guidelines27. Prior to the dry period, cows were maintained on a standard ration formulated for lactating, high-producing cows. As a central organ for metabolism, the liver is substantially influenced by dietary components during the dry period. Dairy cows fed high energy diets at prepartum period exhibited increased lipid accumulation and triglyceride synthesis in the liver, subsequently resulting in greater liver distress after calving36. In contrast, cows fed restricted energy diets during the prepartum period exhibited a greater ability to break down lipids and amino acids, which enhanced adaptability when metabolic challenges arise postpartum. In fact, the restricted diet enhanced their capacity to manage ER stress, likely due to increased protein synthesis and processing36. A recent study found that prepartum high energy intake activated a transcriptional cascade of events, partly driven by the activation of PPARγ, that regulates preadipocyte differentiation and lipid storage in subcutaneous adipose tissue during the periparturient period in Holstein dairy cows37. Likewise, prepartum excessive energy intake is linked to sustained levels of ER stress and oxidative stress postpartum, along with the upregulation of inflammation-related genes in dairy cows38. A study on restricted feeding during the prepartum period observed improved capacity for lipid and amino acid metabolism, indicating that feed-restricted cows adapted better to metabolic challenges20. Moreover, varying dietary energy levels before the dry period can have lasting effects during early lactation, impacting body condition, metabolic status, performance, and hepatic gene expression39,40. These findings demonstrate that different energy diets administered to cows at prepartum period and before the dry period can influence liver transcriptomic profiles during the periparturient period. Prior studies have assessed transcriptomic changes across the prepartum and postpartum periods in dairy cows using diets containing different energy levels or with no information on nutritional management41,42. To facilitate interpretation of similarities and differences in experimental design, dietary context, and key transcriptomic findings across major periparturient liver transcriptomic studies, a concise comparison, including the current study, is provided in Table S7. Therefore, our study focused on exploring liver transcriptomic changes in periparturient cows fed both a common dry-period diet and a common lactation diet.

At the gene level, the top upregulated DEGs were associated with lipid metabolism and transport (including lipoprotein metabolism and fatty-acid/PUFA uptake), energy metabolism, gluconeogenesis, amino acid metabolism, and mitochondrial solute transport. The observed upregulation of APOA1, MFSD2A, APOA4, and ANGPTL4 is directly supported by our differential gene expression analysis, while their roles in lipid metabolism and transport are supported by earlier studies. The APOA1 gene encodes apolipoprotein A1, the major protein component of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and it plays a central role in reverse cholesterol transport43,44. The HDL particles produced by this protein exhibit several beneficial properties, including anti-inflammatory, anti-atherogenic, anti-apoptotic, and anti-thrombotic effects, that occur through various mechanisms. Additionally, HDL plays a crucial role in removing cholesterol from peripheral tissues and transporting it to the liver for excretion via the reverse cholesterol transport mechanism45. APOA1 is synthesized predominantly in the liver and also in the intestine, and then it is secreted into the circulation, where it associates with HDL particles43,44. The APOA1 gene has been shown to be upregulated in the liver in several studies: at 2 weeks postpartum in Holstein cows that do not exhibit subacute ruminal acidosis (non-SARA)19, and between 10 to 14 days postpartum in cows with ketosis46. APOA1 was also found to be up-regulated in over-conditioned cows with a more balanced metabolic phenotype as compared to over-conditioned cows with an “obese” phenotype at d21 of lactation40, where over-conditioned was achieved by divergent feeding before the dry period. The MFSD2A gene encodes a sodium-dependent lysophosphatidylcholine transporter expressed at the blood–brain barrier47, which transports docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) primarily in the form of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC-DHA), rather than unesterified DHA48,49. This protein is crucial for transporting essential long-chain fatty acids, particularly DHA, to the brain. Hepatic MFSD2A is exclusively expressed in periportal hepatocytes and is induced by fasting in mice50. Additionally, it plays a facilitative role in body growth and development, as well as in motor function and lipid metabolism51. The MFSD2A was found to be upregulated in the adipose tissue of dairy cows at 2 weeks postpartum52, in the early postpartum liver of dairy cows comparing multiparous and primiparous cows23, and during the late gestation period of protein-supplemented Nelore bulls53. Furthermore, the APOA4 gene encodes apolipoprotein A-IV, a multifunctional apolipoprotein implicated in lipid adsorption and lipoprotein metabolism; in mice, this protein has been shown to promote hepatic triglyceride secretion (including via very low-density lipoprotein [VLDL]) and reduce hepatic lipid accumulation54. The APOA4 has also been reported to improve glucose homeostasis, at least in part by enhancing glucose-stimulated insulin secretion54,55. An upregulation of the APOA4 gene was observed at 10 days postpartum in the liver of dairy cows56 and at 2 and 6 weeks after parturition in the non-SARA group of Holstein cows19 compared to prepartum period. The ANGPTL4 gene encodes the angiopoietin-like 4 protein, a secreted protein that inhibits lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and thereby regulates plasma triglyceride metabolism and tissue lipid uptake57,58. It also influences glucose homeostasis by affecting lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity, as well as playing a role in angiogenesis59,60. Previous studies have indicated that the ANGPTL4 gene is overexpressed in the livers of postpartum cows experiencing significant NEB61. Additionally, mRNA levels of this gene have been found to be abundant in the subcutaneous adipose tissue of dairy cows during early lactation62. Interestingly, an upregulation of the ANGPTL4 gene’s mRNA expression has also been observed in the liver of prepartum cows treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin63.

The remaining five of the top ten upregulated DEGs were linked to amino acid metabolism, gluconeogenesis, mitochondrial solute transport, energy metabolism, cell cycle/mitosis, and muscle structure. The histidase enzyme, also known as histidine ammonia-lyase, encoded by the HAL gene, is necessary for histidine catabolism, converting L-histidine to trans-urocanic acid. This process facilitates the complete breakdown of histidine into ammonia, glutamate, and other metabolites64. An earlier study reported an upregulation of the HAL gene in the liver of beef cows at − 15 days relative to the calving period, compared to -165 days relative to the calving period65. Pyruvate carboxylase is encoded by the PC gene, which is a vital enzyme for gluconeogenesis, and converts non-carbohydrate substrates into glucose. This process helps maintain energy balance and provides substrates for lipogenesis66. Multiple studies have investigated the expression of the pyruvate carboxylase gene in the liver of periparturient dairy cows. An increased PC gene expression was observed in 14 days postpartum Holstein cows transitioning into ketosis46. This gene expression was also upregulated in postpartum Holstein cows without non-subacute ruminal acidosis19. An increase in the mRNA levels of the PC gene has been observed in the livers of Holstein transition dairy cows infused with 5-hydroxytryptophan67. Additionally, this increase was noted in the postpartum livers of multiparous Holstein cows that were fed protein during the prepartum period68. Moreover, an enhanced expression of the promoter 1-regulated PC transcript was reported during the early postpartum phase69. The SLC25A30 gene, a member of the mitochondrial carrier family, facilitates cellular energy production by connecting mitochondrial and cytosolic metabolic pathways through the transport of various solutes, including carboxylates, amino acids, nucleotides, and cofactors, across the mitochondrial membrane70,71. In early lactation, SLC25A30 was also identified among hepatic genes contributing to an enriched transport-related functional term when comparing metabolically imbalanced versus balanced cows sampled at approximately 14 DIM72. The upregulation of other solute carrier family members, including SLC12A8 and SLC16A5, was previously observed in a related study40. PDK4 encodes pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4, which phosphorylates the E1α component of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and inhibits conversion of pyruvate to acetyl‑CoA, thereby reducing pyruvate oxidation and supporting metabolic flexibility between glucose and fatty‑acid utilization73,74. In early-lactation dairy cows, PDK4 has been reported among genes associated with metabolic clustering linked to energy balance in the liver and blood leukocytes72. CENPF encodes centromere protein F (CENP‑F), which accumulates in late G2, localizes to kinetochores during mitosis, and is degraded after mitosis, consistent with its established role in cell-cycle progression and chromosome segregation75,76. MYOM1 encodes myomesin‑1, a major component of the sarcomeric M‑band that cross-links thick filaments and contributes to myofibrillar structural integrity77,78. The upregulation of this gene was reported in the liver of peripartum beef cows on a grazing system (day +15 postpartum vs day -15 prepartum cows)65. These top upregulated genes found in our study were also reported to be upregulated significantly in the liver of postpartum dairy cows compared to prepartum cows42, and five of these genes (ANGPTL4, APOA4, MFSD2A, MYOM1, and PDK4) were significantly upregulated at day +10 and/or day +17 postpartum relative to day -22 prepartum in red Holstein cows41. The increase in gene expression associated with lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, gluconeogenesis, energy metabolism, and amino acid metabolism during the early postpartum period represents a complex metabolic adaptation. This adaptation is primarily driven by NEB, which occurs due to the high energy demands of lactation combined with reduced feed intake79.

The top downregulated genes were linked to glycogen metabolism, innate immunity and defense, endocrine/vitamin transport, cell signaling, and neural-associated signaling. The CGN1 gene encodes bovine conglutinin, a liver-synthesized serum collectin/opsonin that participates in innate host defense by binding deposited iC3b and microbial glycoconjugates80. The PPP1R3B gene regulates glycogen synthesis in the liver by producing a regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). The PP1 enzyme, recruited to glycogen by glycogen-targeting regulatory subunits, promotes glycogen synthesis by dephosphorylating (activating) glycogen synthase and dephosphorylating (inactivating) glycogen phosphorylase81,82. PPP1R3B was reported to be downregulated in the livers of early lactating cows (10 days postpartum) compared to their dry period (50 days prepartum)56. The PPP1R3C gene encodes regulatory subunits of protein phosphatase 1, playing a similar role to the PPP1R3B gene in promoting glycogen synthesis and storage in the liver83. This gene expression was downregulated in the livers of early postpartum cows due to supplementation with grape seed and grape marc meal extracts, which was part of a broader decrease in genes related to ER stress and unfolded protein response (UPR) pathways84. However, PPP1R3C gene expression was upregulated in the insulin-treated healthy postpartum group (cows with β-hydroxybutyrate [BHBA] < 1.4 mmol/L) compared to the control ketosis group (cows with BHBA ≥ 1.4 mmol/L)85. In addition, both the PPP1RB and PPP1R3C gene expressions were downregulated in the livers of older multiparous cows early in lactation compared to those of primiparous cows23. The RAP2C gene regulates cell adhesion and migration through the Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways by controlling MMP2 activity and the recycling of adhesion molecules, such as LFA-186,87. The FREM3 gene, part of the Fras1/Frem family, encodes a protein found in the extracellular matrix. This protein is vital for regulating cell adhesion and maintaining the structural integrity of basement membranes. It achieves this by facilitating the adhesion of epithelial cells to the underlying mesenchyme through the formation of a macromolecular complex with other family members, such as Fras1 and Frem288. TRNASTOP-UCA is annotated as a transfer RNA (tRNA) gene; tRNAs are core adaptor RNAs required for decoding mRNA codons during protein synthesis89,90. RTN4RL1 (also known as NgR3/NgRH2) is a GPI-anchored leucine-rich repeat receptor within the Nogo receptor family, which has been implicated in neurite outgrowth inhibition and axon regeneration pathways in the central nervous system91–93. CTXND1 encodes a cortexin-domain containing protein; cortexin proteins were originally described as small membrane proteins enriched in the cerebral cortex, but CTXND1 itself remains comparatively poorly characterized in the peer-reviewed literature94. TTR encodes transthyretin, a plasma transport protein synthesized mainly by the liver that carries thyroxine and the retinol-binding protein–retinol complex95,96. Our findings align with previous research indicating that CGN1, PPP1R3B, PPP1R3C, RAP2C, and TTR are significantly downregulated in the livers of postpartum dairy cows compared to prepartum cows42. Notably, four of these genes – PPP1R3B, PPP1R3C, RAP2C, and TTR – were shown to be downregulated in at least one of the comparisons on day +10 or day +17 postpartum when compared to day -22 prepartum in red Holstein cows41. The downregulation of the genes related to glycogen metabolism and storage in the liver, immune responses, endocrine transport, and cell signaling is also part of significant physiological and metabolic changes that occur during the transition period, since the body of the cow prioritizes energy allocation for milk production and adaptation to the early lactation stress16,40,97.

For GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis, we compared our results with previous studies that used RNA sequencing data to investigate the liver adaptation of dairy cows. However, we focused on studies that measured gene expression in periparturient cows subjected to various experimental interventions, such as lactation-induced NEB, supplementation, or special diets, for our discussion. During the early postpartum period, NEB increases lipolysis in adipose tissue and circulating non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA). This leads to increased hepatic uptake of NEFA, and the postpartum liver exhibits greater capacity for fatty-acid beta-oxidation and mitochondrial fatty acid processing compared to the prepartum period6,98. In this context, our data showed significant enrichment of various biological processes (e.g., lipid metabolic process, lipid catabolic process, protein-lipid complex organization/assembly, plasma lipoprotein organization/regulation) alongside KEGG pathways including fatty acid degradation, glycerolipid metabolism, and fat digestion and absorption, which are directly associated with lipid handling and energy production. These enriched GO biological process terms and KEGG pathways related to lipid metabolism align with previous transcriptomic studies that noted similar pathway enhancements in the livers of early postpartum cows16,17,41,42,56,61,99. These enrichments collectively highlight the liver’s central role in adapting to the energy deficit by enhancing lipid mobilization, uptake, and oxidative catabolism. Our dataset reveals a substantial activation of genes associated with fatty acid metabolism pathways, consistent with increased β-oxidation to support ATP generation during periods of limited glucose availability.

Early lactation imposes a major homeorhetic shift: nutrient requirements (especially for glucose/energy) rise sharply, while cows frequently experience NEB. The liver must rapidly adapt to support lactation and systemic energy homeostasis, and this adaptation is mediated by coordinated endocrine and nutrient-sensing signals. In classic transition cow physiology, hormonal adjustments and changes in insulin function contribute to the normal distribution of nutrients toward the mammary gland while managing negative energy balance6,98,100. Consistent with this framework, our study demonstrated high activation of BP terms related to metabolic regulation and homeostasis, including regulation of lipid metabolic process, regulation of fatty acid metabolic process, regulation of lipid biosynthetic process, lipid homeostasis, cholesterol homeostasis, and sterol homeostasis. In parallel, KEGG enrichment also highlighted endocrine/energy-sensing signaling maps that coordinate metabolic state, including AMPK signaling, glucagon signaling pathway, adipocytokine signaling, PPAR signaling, and insulin resistance pathways.

Importantly, the activation of the PPAR signaling pathway provides a regulatory explanation for the lipid-centric liver response. PPARs are lipid-activated nuclear receptors that regulate transcriptional programs involved in lipid metabolism; in ruminant systems, PPARα activation has been linked to increased expression of genes involved in fatty acid transport and oxidation, and postpartum NEFA dynamics have been evaluated as a potential upstream driver of bovine PPAR activity101,102. We observed enhanced activation of PPAR signaling pathway genes, consistent with PPARα functioning as a key transcriptional regulator coordinating lipid catabolic programs during the early postpartum stage.

Our study also revealed significant enrichment in cholesterol metabolism, indicating additional layers of liver metabolic adaptation. Cholesterol homeostasis is linked with lipoprotein metabolism and bile acid-dependent lipid digestion. The increased expression of genes such as APOA1, APOA4, and ANGPTL4 in our data supports involvement of lipoprotein-associated cholesterol transport processes during early lactation. These findings align with earlier reports that demonstrated the upregulation of the cholesterol metabolic pathway in the liver of periparturient cows17,41,56, and increased liver transcription of apolipoprotein genes during early lactation103, consistent with altered lipid flux. Activation of the adipocytokine signaling pathway, particularly through adiponectin- and leptin-linked signaling, indicates enhanced cross-talk between adipose tissue and the liver. An enrichment of adipocytokine signaling pathway genes has been reported in liver transcriptomes of early postpartum cows in relation to NEB46. The enrichment of the glucagon signaling pathway and insulin resistance pathway in our study is consistent with a metabolic transition toward hepatic glucose production and altered insulin action during early lactation98,100,104. Glucagon stimulates hepatic glucose output by activating glycogenesis and gluconeogenesis, which supports the increased glucose demand associated with milk production. Concurrently, reduced systemic insulin sensitivity during early lactation is widely described as an adaptive, homeorhetic feature that helps prioritize glucose utilization by the mammary gland rather than the liver or adipose tissue105. In this context, the upregulation of the insulin resistance pathway in our analysis is consistent with this established physiological adaptation. Importantly, the AMPK signaling pathway was also upregulated, highlighting a key energy-sensing mechanism that regulates cellular metabolism. AMPK is activated under conditions of increased AMP:ATP ratios and promotes catabolic pathways such as fatty acid oxidation, while inhibiting anabolic processes like lipogenesis106. Its activation in the early postpartum liver is consistent with the energy-deficient state commonly observed in high-producing dairy cows, to restore energy homeostasis. Most of these pathways, including adipocytokine signaling pathway41,42, glucagon signaling pathway41,42,56, and AMPK signaling pathway41,42,56,61, have been reported to be activated in the liver of early postpartum cows.

The transition from late gestation to early lactation imposes substantial metabolic and physiological stress on the liver due to increased demands for gluconeogenesis, lipid mobilization, and overall metabolic reprogramming required to support milk production. The liver must rapidly adapt to meet these demands, and hepatocellular proliferation may be a critical component of this adaptive response. Enhanced hepatocyte proliferation ensures the maintenance of liver functional mass, particularly as cows are susceptible to hepatic lipid accumulation during early lactation under NEB6,98. The upregulation of genes governing cell division and chromosome segregation in our study likely reflects a regenerative or compensatory response to increased metabolic workload. Similar patterns of cell cycle gene activation in the liver have been observed in early postpartum Holstein cows, where proliferative signaling was found to be upregulated alongside pathways related to metabolic adaptation and stress response15. Additionally, mitosis-related gene activation may be influenced by hormonal and endocrine changes occurring around parturition, and the liver is integrated with growth hormone/IGF-axis physiology that shapes postpartum metabolism107.

During the immediate postpartum phase, dairy cows experience a significant increase in energy demand to support the onset of lactation, often while facing insufficient dry matter intake108. This imbalance triggers NEB, leading to enhanced liver gluconeogenesis as a compensatory mechanism to maintain blood glucose, critical for milk synthesis109. The liver becomes the primary site for glucose production via gluconeogenic pathways, utilizing substrates such as propionate, lactate, and amino acids110. The observed upregulation of the TCA cycle pathway in our study supports this physiological shift, as propionate, absorbed from the rumen, is the major glucogenic precursor in ruminants and enters gluconeogenesis via conversion to succinyl-CoA in the TCA cycle111. Additionally, enrichment of the pyruvate metabolism is consistent with increased liver flux through pyruvate as an intermediate connecting glycolysis-related inputs to gluconeogenesis and oxidative metabolism. Moreover, glycolytic intermediates may also contribute to biosynthetic processes, including lipid and amino acid metabolism, suggesting a coordinated liver response that supports both energy production and broader metabolic demands during early lactation. Concordantly, GO biological process enrichment supported a shift in intermediary carbon metabolism, with over-representation of broad small-molecule and organic-acid process terms, including small molecule metabolic process and small molecule biosynthetic process, as well as organic acid, carboxylic acid, oxoacid, and monocarboxylic acid metabolic processes, which collectively capture central metabolite transformations that feed into pyruvate and TCA-linked energy metabolism. These findings align with earlier transcriptomic and proteomic studies that have documented the activation of energy-generating and gluconeogenic pathways in the liver during early lactation23,42,56,112. The transcriptional upregulation of these metabolic pathways likely reflects a crucial adaptation to the catabolic state of early postpartum cows, underscoring the importance of liver plasticity in sustaining milk production during periods of metabolic challenge. Co-expression gene network analysis further confirmed the activation of the biological processes and KEGG pathways discussed above.

In early postpartum dairy cows, the liver undergoes a marked transition from a more anabolic state to a metabolism geared toward supporting lactation, including substantial hepatic adaptations in glucose and lipid handling98. Consistent with this transition, the enrichment of downregulated terms related to carbohydrate and polysaccharide metabolism—including regulation of carbohydrate metabolic process, regulation of glucan biosynthetic process, regulation of glycogen metabolic process and biosynthetic process, and regulation of polysaccharide metabolic process and biosynthetic process—suggests reduced transcriptional emphasis on pathways governing hepatic glycogen and related storage polymers. Instead, the liver prioritizes gluconeogenesis, particularly from non-carbohydrate sources, such as amino acids and glycerol, to sustain plasma glucose levels for the mammary gland98,113. This metabolic switch is consistent with reports showing diminished glycogen reserves in the liver of early lactation cows114, reflecting both reduced synthesis and active utilization of liver glycogen. The downregulation of stress-response–related terms, including response to ischemia and response to abiotic stimulus, suggests altered transcriptional regulation of hepatic stress-response programs during early lactation. Oxidative stress is widely recognized as a feature of the transition period in dairy cows115, and significant changes in hepatic metabolic and signaling gene networks were reported in nutrition-induced ketosis46. Beyond carbohydrate-related processes, enrichment of downregulated categories tied to small-molecule metabolism and generation of precursor metabolites and energy (regulation of small-molecule metabolic process; regulation of generation of precursor metabolites and energy) indicates that postpartum hepatic adaptation also involves coordinated changes in multiple intermediary metabolic nodes, rather than a single pathway shift. In parallel, downregulation of lipid biosynthetic process and ketone metabolic process indicates that lipid-related anabolic regulation and ketone-associated regulatory programs are among the transcriptionally responsive modules during this period. This aligns with the established physiology of early lactation in which extensive adipose lipolysis increases hepatic NEFA influx and elevates risk for hepatic lipid accumulation and ketosis-related metabolic remodeling98,114, and with transcriptomic evidence that ketosis and early postpartum state reshape hepatic metabolic and signaling networks46. The enrichment results also point to broad changes in cell communication and signaling regulation (regulation of signaling; regulation/positive regulation of signaling and signal transduction; regulation/positive regulation of cell communication) and cell population proliferation, indicating that postpartum hepatic adaptation extends beyond metabolism to include regulatory signaling programs and tissue remodeling. The downregulation of the p53 signaling pathway, which is central to apoptosis, DNA repair, and cell cycle arrest, may represent an adaptive response that limits hepatocellular turnover and preserves liver function during metabolic challenges. Consistent with this directionality, inhibition of apoptosis and the p53 signaling pathway was reported in postpartum versus prepartum liver comparison42. Finally, the presence of response to ischemia and response to abiotic stimulus among downregulated terms suggests altered stress-response programming during early lactation, a period widely recognized to be associated with systemic oxidative stress and metabolic strain in transition cows115 and measurable alterations in hepatic mitochondrial function in early lactation116. Notably, enrichment of the ovulation cycle term among downregulated hepatic DEGs may reflect the broader postpartum physiology in which negative energy balance and metabolic load are associated with delayed resumption of ovarian cyclicity and reduced reproductive efficiency117,118.

This study has several important limitations. First, the small sample size (n = 6) limits statistical power, increases sensitivity to inter-individual variability, and constrains population-level inference; accordingly, these results should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. Second, the two-time-point design (D−21 and D+7) provides only a transcriptomic snapshot and may not capture transitional dynamics occurring between or outside these windows. Third, gene-expression changes were not directly integrated with phenotypic or metabolic measures (e.g., plasma NEFA/BHBA, liver triglyceride content, milk production traits), which limits the ability to link transcriptional shifts to functional outcomes. Finally, due to limited remaining RNA, targeted qPCR validation was not performed; future work in larger, independent cohorts with denser temporal sampling and integrated metabolic/performance phenotyping will be needed to confirm key differentially expressed genes and refine biological interpretation.

In summary, this study provides a well-documented liver transcriptomic dataset from U.S. Holstein cows sampled at D−21 prepartum and D+7 postpartum under a clearly defined management and dietary context. We observed coordinated postpartum hepatic reprogramming, with increased expression of genes and pathways related to lipid handling, energy metabolism and gluconeogenesis, and decreased expression of glycogen synthesis and select immune/transport functions, consistent with transition-period adaptation to lactation-associated energy demands under negative energy balance. Given the limited sample size, two-time-point design, absence of paired metabolic/performance phenotypes, and lack of qPCR validation, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Future studies with larger cohorts, finer temporal resolution, independent validation, and integration of transcriptomic, metabolic, and production traits will be required to establish robust links between hepatic gene regulation and transition-period health and performance.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

We thank Reuben Anderson, Mary Bowman, Donald Carbaugh, Jana L. Hutchison, Cecelia Niland, Daniel J. Null, and Sara McQueeney for technical assistance and sample collection. We thank the Cooperative Dairy DNA Repository (CDDR) for providing access to sequence data that was used for this research project. We thank the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (Bowie, MD, USA) for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree data, Interbull (Uppsala, Sweden) for global trait evaluations, and the anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments. Mentioning trade names or commercial products in this article is solely to provide specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: N.B., G.E.L.; methodology: N.B. and G.E.L.; software: N.B.; validation: N.B.; formal analysis: N.B.; investigation: N.B.; resources: N.B. and G.E.L.; data curation: N.B.; writing—original draft: N.B.; writing—review and editing: N.B., M.D.S., A.C., A.M.M., C.J.L., C.P.V.T., R.L.B.VI, E.R., G.E.L.; visualization: N.B.; supervision: G.E.L.; project administration: G.E.L.; funding acquisition: G.E.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project is supported in part by AFRI grant numbers 2019-67015-29321 and 2021-67015-33409 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Data availability

The data that support the results of this research are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the SRA repository under accession PRJNA1321943 at https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1321943.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Institutional review board

The animal study protocol was approved by the BARC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, #AUP-22-01). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, and all methods are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org).

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Oliveira, A. C. D. et al. Periparturient blood T-lymphocyte PD-1 and CTLA-4 expression as potential predictors of new intramammary infections in dairy cows during early lactation (short communication). BMC Vet. Res.10.1186/s12917-024-03977-1 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khan, M. Z. et al. Role of selenium and vitamins E and B9 in the alleviation of bovine mastitis during the periparturient period. Antioxidants10.3390/antiox11040657 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Contreras, G. A. et al. Periparturient lipolysis and oxylipid biosynthesis in bovine adipose tissues. PLoS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.0188621 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hatfield, C. et al. A prospective cohort study on the periparturient muscle tissue mobilisation in high producing dairy cows. Animals10.3390/ani12141772 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mordak, R. & Anthony, S. P. Periparturient stress and immune suppression as a potential cause of retained placenta in highly productive dairy cows: Examples of prevention. Acta Vet. Scand.10.1186/s13028-015-0175-2 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McFadden, J. W. Review: Lipid Biology in the Periparturient Dairy Cow: Contemporary Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mikuła, R. et al. Changes in metabolic and hormonal profiles during transition period in dairy cattle – the role of spexin. BMC Vet. Res.10.1186/s12917-021-03069-4 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schuh, K. et al. Blood and adipose tissue steroid metabolomics and mRNA expression of steroidogenic enzymes in periparturient dairy cows differing in body condition. Sci. Rep.12, 2297–2297 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rafa, H. et al. Peripartal changes of metabolic and hormonal parameters in Romanian spotted cows and their relation with retained fetal membranes. Front. Vet. Sci.10.3389/fvets.2024.1409666 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Monteiro, P. L. J. et al. Hormonal profiles and biomarkers leading to parturition in cattle. Biol. Reprod.10.1093/biolre/ioae133 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Larsen, M. & Kristensen, N. B. Precursors for liver gluconeogenesis in periparturient dairy cows. Animal7, 1640–1650 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schäff, C. et al. Increased anaplerosis, TCA cycling, and oxidative phosphorylation in the liver of dairy cows with intensive body fat mobilization during early lactation. J. Proteome Res.11, 5503–5514 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim, J. W. et al. Dairy cows experience selective reduction of the hepatic growth hormone receptor during the periparturient period. J. Endocrinol.181, 281–290 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gessner, D. K., Schlegel, G., Ringseis, R., Schwarz, F. J. & Eder, K. Up-regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress induced genes of the unfolded protein response in the liver of periparturient dairy cows. BMC Vet. Res.10.1186/1746-6148-10-46 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Loor, J. J. et al. Temporal gene expression profiling of liver from periparturient dairy cows reveals complex adaptive mechanisms in hepatic function. Physiol. Genomics23, 217–226 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Du, X. et al. The effects of rumen-protected choline and rumen-protected nicotinamide on liver transcriptomics in periparturient dairy cows. Metabolites10.3390/metabo13050594 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang, Y. et al. Transcriptome in liver of periparturient dairy cows differs between supplementation of rumen-protected niacin and rumen-protected nicotinamide. Metabolites10.3390/metabo14030150 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ringseis, R., Wächter, S., Cohrs, I., Eder, K. & Grünberg, W. Effect of dietary phosphorus deprivation during the dry period on the liver transcriptome of high-yielding periparturient dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.107, 5178–5189 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tsuchiya, Y. et al. Liver transcriptome response to periparturient hormonal and metabolic changes depends on the postpartum occurrence of subacute ruminal acidosis in Holstein cows. Physiol. Genomics53, 285–294 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vailati-Riboni, M. et al. Prepartum body condition score and plane of nutrition affect the hepatic transcriptome during the transition period in grazing dairy cows. BMC Genomics10.1186/s12864-016-3191-3 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Loor, J. J. et al. Plane of nutrition prepartum alters hepatic gene expression and function in dairy cows as assessed by longitudinal transcript and metabolic profiling. Physiol. Genomics27, 29–41 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qin, N. et al. Prepartal high-energy feeding with grass silage-based diets does not disturb the hepatic adaptation of dairy cows during the periparturient period. J. Dairy Sci.101, 8929–8943 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cheng, Z. et al. Hepatic global transcriptomic profiles of Holstein cows according to parity reveal age-related changes in early lactation. Int. J. Mol. Sci.10.3390/ijms24129906 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hammami, H., Rekik, B. & Gengler, N. Genotype by environment interaction in dairy cattle. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ.13, 155–164 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shabalina, T., Yin, T., May, K. & König, S. Proofs for genotype by environment interactions considering pedigree and genomic data from organic and conventional cow reference populations. J. Dairy Sci.104, 4452–4466 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Silva Neto, J. B. et al. Genotype‐by‐environment interactions in beef and dairy cattle populations: A review of methodologies and perspectives on research and applications. Anim. Genet.55, 871–892 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Division on Earth and Life Studies, & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Eighth Revised Edition. 25806. 10.17226/25806. (National Academies Press, 2021). [PubMed]
  • 28.Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics30, 2114–2120 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dobin, A. et al. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics29, 15–21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics30, 923–930 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol.11, R106–R106 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Thomas, P. D. et al. PANTHER: Making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all. Protein Sci.31, 8–22 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. ClusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS16, 284–287 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform.9, 559 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shahzad, K. et al. Integrative analyses of hepatic differentially expressed genes and blood biomarkers during the peripartal period between dairy cows overfed or restricted-fed energy prepartum. PLoS ONE9, e99757 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Minuti, A. et al. Prepartum dietary energy intake alters adipose tissue transcriptome profiles during the periparturient period in Holstein dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.11, 1 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Khan, M. J. et al. Stress and inflammatory gene networks in bovine liver are altered by plane of dietary energy during late pregnancy. Funct. Integr. Genomics15, 563–576 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schuh, K. et al. Comparison of performance and metabolism from late pregnancy to early lactation in dairy cows with elevated v. normal body condition at dry-off. Animal13, 1478–1488 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ghaffari, M. H., Sadri, H., Trakooljul, N., Koch, C. & Sauerwein, H. Liver transcriptome profiles of dairy cows with different serum metabotypes. J. Dairy Sci.107, 1751–1765 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ha, N.-T. et al. Liver transcriptome analysis reveals important factors involved in the metabolic adaptation of the transition cow. J. Dairy Sci.100, 9311–9323 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gao, S. T., Girma, D. D., Bionaz, M., Ma, L. & Bu, D. P. Hepatic transcriptomic adaptation from prepartum to postpartum in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.104, 1053–1072 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Curtiss, L. K., Valenta, D. T., Hime, N. J. & Rye, K.-A. What is so special about apolipoprotein AI in reverse cholesterol transport?. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.26, 12–19 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xu, X., Song, Z., Mao, B. & Xu, G. Apolipoprotein A1-related proteins and reverse cholesterol transport in antiatherosclerosis therapy: recent progress and future perspectives. Cardiovasc. Ther.2022, 1–9 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bhale, A. S. & Venkataraman, K. Leveraging knowledge of HDLs major protein ApoA1: Structure, function, mutations, and potential therapeutics. Biomed. Pharmacother.10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113634 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Loor, J. J. et al. Nutrition-induced ketosis alters metabolic and signaling gene networks in liver of periparturient dairy cows. Physiol. Genomics32, 105–116 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wong, B. H. et al. Mfsd2a is a transporter for the essential ω-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in eye and is important for photoreceptor cell development. J. Biol. Chem.291, 10501–10514 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nguyen, L. N. et al. Mfsd2a is a transporter for the essential omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid. Nature509, 503–506 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Quek, D. Q. Y., Nguyen, L. N., Fan, H. & Silver, D. L. Structural insights into the transport mechanism of the human sodium-dependent lysophosphatidylcholine transporter MFSD2A. J. Biol. Chem.291, 9383–9394 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pu, W. et al. Mfsd2a+ hepatocytes repopulate the liver during injury and regeneration. Nat. Commun.7, 13369–13369 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Berger, J. H., Charron, M. J. & Silver, D. L. Major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 2a (MFSD2A) has roles in body growth, motor function, and lipid metabolism. PLoS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.0050629 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Salcedo-Tacuma, D. et al. Transcriptomic profiling of adipose tissue inflammation, remodeling, and lipid metabolism in periparturient dairy cows (Bos taurus). BMC Genomics21, 824 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Polizel, G. H. G. et al. Late gestation maternal nutrition has a stronger impact on offspring liver transcriptome than full-gestation supplementation in beef cattle. Vet. Sci.10.3390/vetsci12050406 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Qu, J., Ko, C.-W., Tso, P. & Bhargava, A. Apolipoprotein A-IV: A multifunctional protein involved in protection against atherosclerosis and diabetes. Cells8, 319–319 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang, F. et al. Apolipoprotein A-IV improves glucose homeostasis by enhancing insulin secretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.109, 9641–9646 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li, Q. et al. Identification of candidate genes for milk production traits by RNA sequencing on bovine liver at different lactation stages. BMC Genet.21, 72–72 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dijk, W. & Kersten, S. Regulation of lipid metabolism by angiopoietin-like proteins. Curr. Opin. Lipidol.27, 249–256 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kersten, S. Role and mechanism of the action of angiopoietin-like protein ANGPTL4 in plasma lipid metabolism. J. Lipid Res.10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100150 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fernández-Hernando, C. & Suárez, Y. ANGPTL4: A multifunctional protein involved in metabolism and vascular homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Hematol.27, 206–213 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Xu, Z. & Jiang, G. ANGPTL4—A protein involved in glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, and tumor development. J. Gene Med.26, e3740 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McCabe, M. et al. RNA-seq analysis of differential gene expression in liver from lactating dairy cows divergent in negative energy balance. BMC Genomics13, 193 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Koltes, D. A. & Spurlock, D. M. Adipose tissue angiopoietin-like protein 4 messenger RNA changes with altered energy balance in lactating Holstein cows. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol.43, 307–316 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Silva, P. R. B. et al. Hepatic mRNA expression for genes related to somatotropic axis, glucose and lipid metabolisms, and inflammatory response of periparturient dairy cows treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin. J. Dairy Sci.100, 3983–3999 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Brosnan, M. E. & Brosnan, J. T. Histidine metabolism and function. J. Nutr.150, 2570S-2575S (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Laporta, J., Rosa, G. J. M., Naya, H. & Carriquiry, M. Liver functional genomics in beef cows on grazing systems: Novel genes and pathways revealed. Physiol. Genomics46, 138–147 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.White, H. M., Koser, S. L. & Donkin, S. S. Bovine pyruvate carboxylase 5′ untranslated region variant expression during transition to lactation and feed restriction in dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci.89, 1881–1892 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Weaver, S. R. et al. Elevating serotonin pre-partum alters the Holstein dairy cow hepatic adaptation to lactation. PLoS ONE12, e0184939–e0184939 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Greenfield, R. B., Cecava, M. J. & Donkin, S. S. Changes in mRNA expression for gluconeogenic enzymes in liver of dairy cattle during the transition to lactation. J. Dairy Sci.83, 1228–1236 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Walker, C. G. et al. Epigenetic regulation of pyruvate carboxylase gene expression in the postpartum liver. J. Dairy Sci.99, 5820–5827 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kunji, E. R. S., King, M. S., Ruprecht, J. J. & Thangaratnarajah, C. The SLC25 carrier family: Important transport proteins in mitochondrial physiology and pathology. Physiology35, 302–327 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Palmieri, F. Energy metabolism | mitochondrial transporters of the solute carrier 25 (SLC25) superfamily. In Encyclopedia of Biological Chemistry III 213–243 (Elsevier, 2021). 10.1016/B978-0-12-819460-7.00060-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wathes, D. C. et al. Relationships between metabolic profiles and gene expression in liver and leukocytes of dairy cows in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci.104, 3596–3616 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jeoung, N. H. & Harris, R. A. Role of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase 4 in regulation of blood glucose levels. Korean Diabetes J.34, 274–274 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Connaughton, S. et al. Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase isoform 4 (PDK4) gene expression by glucocorticoids and insulin. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.315, 159–167 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liao, H., Winkfein, R. J., Mack, G., Rattner, J. B. & Yen, T. J. CENP-F is a protein of the nuclear matrix that assembles onto kinetochores at late G2 and is rapidly degraded after mitosis. J. Cell Biol.130, 507–518 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ciossani, G. et al. The kinetochore proteins CENP-E and CENP-F directly and specifically interact with distinct BUB mitotic checkpoint Ser/Thr kinases. J. Biol. Chem.293, 10084–10101 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Agarkova, I. & Perriard, J.-C. The M-band: An elastic web that crosslinks thick filaments in the center of the sarcomere. Trends Cell Biol.15, 477–485 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lange, S., Pinotsis, N., Agarkova, I. & Ehler, E. The M-band: The underestimated part of the sarcomere. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res.1867, 118440–118440 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Khan, M. J. et al. Overfeeding dairy cattle during late-pregnancy alters hepatic PPARα-regulated pathways including hepatokines: impact on metabolism and peripheral insulin sensitivity. Gene Regul. Syst. Biol.10.4137/GRSB.S14116 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hansen, S. et al. Novel characterisation of the gene encoding conglutinin reveals that previously characterised promoter corresponds to the CL-43 promoter. Mol. Immunol.39, 39–43 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Brady, M. J. The role of Protein Phosphatase-1 in Insulin action. Recent Prog. Horm. Res.56, 157–174 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kumar, G. S. et al. Identification of the substrate recruitment mechanism of the muscle glycogen protein phosphatase 1 holoenzyme. Sci. Adv.10.1126/sciadv.aau6044 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mehta, M. B. et al. Hepatic protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3B (Ppp1r3b) promotes hepatic glycogen synthesis and thereby regulates fasting energy homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem.292, 10444–10454 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gessner, D. K. et al. Analysis of hepatic transcript profile and plasma lipid profile in early lactating dairy cows fed grape seed and grape marc meal extract. BMC Genomics18, 253–253 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Guo, Y., Zhao, Y., Wei, Z. & Cao, J. Effects of exogenous insulin supplementation on lipid metabolism in peripartum obese dairy cows. Front. Vet. Sci.11, 1468779 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Stanley, P., Tooze, S. A. & Hogg, N. A role for Rap2 in recycling the extended conformation of LFA-1 during T cell migration. Biol. Open1, 1161–1168 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wu, J. et al. Ras-related protein rap2c promotes the migration and invasion of human osteosarcoma cells. Oncol. Lett.15, 5352–5358 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Petrou, P., Makrygiannis, A. K. & Chalepakis, G. The fras1/frem family of extracellular matrix proteins: Structure, function, and association with Fraser syndrome and the mouse bleb phenotype. Connect. Tissue Res.49, 277–282 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lowe, T. M. & Eddy, S. R. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res.25, 955–964 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pan, T. Modifications and functional genomics of human transfer RNA. Cell Res.28, 395–404 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Pignot, V. et al. Characterization of two novel proteins, NgRH1 and NgRH2, structurally and biochemically homologous to the Nogo‐66 receptor. J. Neurochem.85, 717–728 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Barton, W. A. Structure and axon outgrowth inhibitor binding of the Nogo-66 receptor and related proteins. EMBO J.22, 3291–3302 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zhang, L., Kuang, X. & Zhang, J. Nogo receptor 3, a paralog of Nogo-66 receptor 1 (NgR1), may function as a NgR1 co-receptor for Nogo-66. J. Genet. Genomics38, 515–523 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Coulter, P. M., Bautista, E. A., Margulies, J. E. & Watson, J. B. Identification of Cortexin: A novel, neuron-specific, 82-residue membrane protein enriched in rodent cerebral cortex. J. Neurochem.61, 756–759 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Bellovino, D., Morimoto, T., Tosetti, F. & Gaetani, S. Retinol binding protein and Transthyretin are secreted as a complex formed in the endoplasmic reticulum in HepG2 human hepatocarcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res.222, 77–83 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Sanguinetti, C. et al. The journey of human Transthyretin: Synthesis, structure stability, and catabolism. Biomedicines10, 1906–1906 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Shahzad, K. Systems Physiology and Nutrition in Dairy Cattle: Applications of Omics and Bioinformatics to Better Understand the Hepatic Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Adaptations in Transition Dairy Cows (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Drackley, J. K., Overton, T. R. & Douglas, G. N. Adaptations of glucose and long-chain fatty acid metabolism in liver of dairy cows during the periparturient period. J. Dairy Sci.84, E100–E112 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Du, C. et al. Hepatic transcriptome reveals potential key genes contributing to differential milk production. Genes10.3390/genes15091229 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.De Koster, J. D. & Opsomer, G. Insulin resistance in dairy cows. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract.29, 299–322 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Bionaz, M., Thering, B. J. & Loor, J. J. Fine metabolic regulation in ruminants via nutrient–gene interactions: Saturated long-chain fatty acids increase expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism and immune response partly through PPAR-α activation. Br. J. Nutr.107, 179–191 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Busato, S. & Bionaz, M. The interplay between non-esterified fatty acids and bovine peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: Results of an in vitro hybrid approach. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.11, 91–91 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Graber, M. et al. A field study on characteristics and diversity of gene expression in the liver of dairy cows during the transition period. J. Dairy Sci.93, 5200–5215 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zhang, J., Zheng, Y., Martens, L. & Pfeiffer, A. F. H. The regulation and secretion of glucagon in response to nutrient composition: Unraveling their intricate mechanisms. Nutrients15, 3913–3913 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Fu, L., Ramos-Roman, M. A. & Deng, Y. Metabolic adaptation in lactation: Insulin-dependent and -independent glycemic control. J. Transl. Intern. Med.10, 191–196 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Garcia, D. & Shaw, R. J. AMPK: Mechanisms of cellular energy sensing and restoration of metabolic balance. Mol. Cell66, 789–800 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lucy, M. Functional differences in the growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor axis in cattle and pigs: Implications for post-partum nutrition and reproduction. Reprod. Domest. Anim.43, 31–39 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Roche, J. R. et al. Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. J. Dairy Sci.92, 5769–5801 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Drackley, J. K. Biology of dairy cows during the transition period: The final frontier?. J. Dairy Sci.82, 2259–2273 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Aschenbach, J. R., Kristensen, N. B., Donkin, S. S., Hammon, H. M. & Penner, G. B. Gluconeogenesis in dairy cows: The secret of making sweet milk from sour dough. IUBMB Life62, 869–877 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Reynolds, C. K., Aikman, P. C., Lupoli, B., Humphries, D. J. & Beever, D. E. Splanchnic metabolism of dairy cows during the transition from late gestation through early lactation. J. Dairy Sci.86, 1201–1217 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zhou, Z. et al. Circulating amino acids in blood plasma during the peripartal period in dairy cows with different liver functionality index. J. Dairy Sci.99, 2257–2267 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Wang, G. et al. Hepatic gluconeogenesis and regulatory mechanisms in lactating ruminants: A literature review. Anim. Res. One Health10.1002/aro2.80 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Bobe, G., Young, J. W. & Beitz, D. C. Invited review: Pathology, etiology, prevention, and treatment of fatty liver in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.87, 3105–3124 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Sordillo, L. M. & Aitken, S. L. Impact of oxidative stress on the health and immune function of dairy cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.128, 104–109 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.García-Roche, M. et al. Impaired hepatic mitochondrial function during early lactation in dairy cows: Association with protein lysine acetylation. PLoS ONE14, e0213780 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Butler, W. R. & Smith, R. D. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.72, 767–783 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Lucy, M. C. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: Where will it end?. J. Dairy Sci.84, 1277–1293 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the results of this research are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the SRA repository under accession PRJNA1321943 at https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1321943.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES