Skip to main content
Plant Biotechnology Journal logoLink to Plant Biotechnology Journal
. 2026 Feb 19;24(6):3739–3741. doi: 10.1111/pbi.70603

The Rice E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene OsPUB77 Regulates Head Milled Rice Rate by Affecting Grain Starch Accumulation

Shuai Nie 1,2,3,4, Luo Chen 1,2,3,4, Leilei Kong 1,2,3,4, Minhua Zheng 1,2,3,4, Jingfang Dong 1,2,3,4, Song Bai 1,2,3,4, Dilin Liu 1,2,3,4, Shaohong Zhang 1,2,3,4, Hao Chen 1,2,3,4, Haifei Hu 1,2,3,4, Xin Luan 1,2,3,4,✉, Junliang Zhao 1,2,3,4,✉, Wu Yang 1,2,3,4,✉
PMCID: PMC13205682  PMID: 41714903

ABSTRACT

Head milled rice rate (HMRR) is a critical trait determining rice yield and economic value, yet its genetic basis remains poorly understood. Here, through genome‐wide association study across multiple environments, we identified a major QTL, qHMRR4‐2, and pinpointed OsPUB77, a U‐box E3 ubiquitin ligase, as the causal gene. Haplotype analysis and transgenic validation revealed that both knockout and overexpression of OsPUB77 significantly reduce HMRR by disrupting starch accumulation and increasing grain chalkiness. We further demonstrated that OsMADS29 directly binds to the OsPUB77 promoter and represses its transcription. Transcriptomic analysis indicated that OsPUB77 maintains metabolic homeostasis essential for starch biosynthesis during grain filling. Our findings establish the OsMADS29‐OsPUB77 module as a critical regulator of HMRR and provide a promising target for improving rice milling quality through precision breeding.


Head milled rice rate (HMRR), defined as the proportion of milled kernels retaining at least 75% of their original length, is a key determinant of rice productivity and market value (Zhu et al. 2024). Despite its importance, the genetic basis of this complex quantitative trait remains largely unclear, with only a few genes having been identified to date (Sreenivasulu 2019; Deng et al. 2022). This limited understanding hampers molecular breeding efforts aimed at improving this economically important trait.

To dissect the genetic architecture of HMRR, we evaluated the HMRR of 300 diverse indica accessions across two environments, identifying 15 associated QTLs via genome‐wide association study (GWAS) (Figure 1a; Figure S1, Tables S1 and S2). Four QTLs were co‐localized with previously reported QTLs or genes, and among the novel QTLs, qHMRR4‐2 on chromosome 4 was consistently detected across two environments (Table S2). Within this locus, HMRR varied significantly among accessions carrying contrasting haplotypes (Figure 1b). Linkage disequilibrium decay analysis delimited qHMRR4‐2 to a 260‐kb interval containing 31 annotated genes (Figure 1c and Table S3).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

OsPUB77 regulates head milled rice rate (HMRR) by affecting grain starch accumulation. (a) GWAS for HMRR. The 2016GZ and 2018YJ represent the two environments, respectively. (b) Phenotypic comparison between accessions corresponding to each of the two alleles of leading SNP (major allele ‘C’ vs. minor allele ‘A’ of Chr4‐29 582 749) for qHMRR4‐2. (c) The local Manhattan plot and the linkage disequilibrium heatmap for qHMRR4‐2. (d) In the LD block of qHMRR4‐2, a gene with significant differential expression (DE) was identified between samples corresponding to each of the two alleles (‘C’ vs. ‘A’) of leading SNP. Red dot was defined as DE gene, while blue dots represent stably expressed genes. (e) Comparison of HMRR among accessions harbouring four haplotypes of OsPUB77. (f) and (g) represent the population and geographic distributions of the four haplotypes among 3 K rice genomes, respectively. (h–m) Phenotypic comparisons among the wild type (an indica accession No. 659), gene knockout lines (KO‐1, KO‐2), and gene overexpression lines (OE‐7 and OE‐9) of OsPUB77. Values are means ± SD. Student's t‐test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns, no significance. (h) Phenotypes of HMRR in wild type and transgenic lines. (i–m) represent the statistical results of HMRR, percentage of grains with chalkiness (PGWC), degree of endosperm chalkiness (DEC), starch content, and thousand grain weight of brown rice, respectively. (n) Y1H assay showing the direct binding of OsMADS29 to the promoter of OsPUB77. The empty constructs of pJG4‐5 and pLacZi2μ served as the negative controls. (o) Luciferase complementation imaging assay and histogram showing the interaction of OsMADS29 with the promoter of OsPUB77 in N. benthamiana leaves. The pseudo‐colour bar shows the range of luminescence intensity in each image. (p) Comparison of pathway networks of GO enrichment analysis for two sets of DE genes from KO vs. 659 and OE vs. 659. The nodes represent the pathways, and the edges represent Jaccard similarity between them. All clusters can be categorised into three types: Those specific to the DE genes in ‘OE vs. 659’, those specific to the DE genes in another set of ‘KO vs. 659’, and those consensus between both sets of DE genes. (q) A proposed model for the role of OsPUB77 and its regulator OsMADS29 in the regulation of HMRR.

To identify the key functional gene within the qHMRR4‐2 locus, we employed a comprehensive prioritisation approach. RNA sequencing of filling seeds from phenotypically contrasting accessions (high versus low HMRR) proved highly informative. Among these, only the LOC_Os04g49500 gene (OsPUB77) showed significantly differential expression in filling seeds between the two contrasting accession sets, a pattern confirmed by qRT‐PCR (Figure 1d and Figure S2). Furthermore, genetic linkage analysis showed that OsPUB77 exhibited the highest LD with the lead SNP (with the lowest p‐value of qHMRR4‐2) (Figure S3a). Crucially, haplotype analysis provided definitive evidence: phenotyping of accessions carrying the four major OsPUB77 haplotypes (Hap1–4) revealed that Hap4 was associated with significantly lower HMRR compared to Hap1, Hap2 or Hap3 (Figure 1e and Figure S4). Parallel haplotype‐phenotype association tests for the other candidate genes showed no significant correlation with HMRR variation (Figure S3). Leveraging 3 K genome data (Wang et al. 2018), Hap1 and Hap3 predominated in indica, whereas Hap2 and Hap4 clustered in japonica and aus subpopulations, respectively, with low‐HMRR Hap4 accessions concentrated in South Asia (Figure 1f,g). OsPUB77 encodes a nucleus‐ and cytoplasm‐localised U‐box E3 ubiquitin ligase (Figure S5), a protein class implicated in regulating grain traits via cellular metabolism and protein dynamics (Wang et al. 2022). Collectively, this convergence of multi‐layered evidence, combined with functional exclusion of neighbouring genes, conclusively establishes OsPUB77 as the key functional gene at this locus.

We established transgenic lines, comprising two gene knockout lines (KO‐1 and KO‐2) and two gene overexpression lines (OE‐7 and OE‐9), to validate the role of OsPUB77 in regulating HMRR (Figures S6 and S7). Remarkably, both KO and OE lines exhibited decreased HMRR, accompanied by increased percentage of grains with chalkiness (PGWC) and the degree of endosperm chalkiness (DEC) (Figure 1h–k). Additionally, starch content was reduced, and the thousand‐grain weight decreased in transgenic lines at filling and ripening stages (Figure 1l,m). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in protein content, grain perimeter, grain length, grain width, grain length‐width ratio or amylose content between transgenic lines and the wild type (Figure S8). Reduced starch accumulation can increase grain susceptibility to breakage during processing, thereby leading to declined HMRR (Ma et al. 2023). Collectively, both knockout and overexpression of OsPUB77 negatively impact HMRR, indicating that the precise regulation of OsPUB77 expression is related to HMRR.

Given that both knockout and overexpression of OsPUB77 reduce HMRR, we investigated upstream regulators. OsMADS29, a well‐characterised grain development regulator (Nayar et al. 2013), was identified as a direct transcriptional repressor that binds to the OsPUB77 promoter (Table S5). This interaction was demonstrated by yeast one‐hybrid (Figure 1n), and luciferase complementation imaging assays further confirmed that OsMADS29 binding to the OsPUB77 promoter directly represses its transcriptional activity (Figure 1o). The relative expression of OsPUB77 peaked in the filling seeds at the 10th day after flowering (Figure S9), prompting us to perform RNA‐sequencing at the same time point. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between KO and OE lines was smaller than that between transgenic lines and wild‐type (Figure S10). This suggests that dysregulation in either direction disrupts a common set of core pathways. Indeed, GO enrichment showed that DEGs in both KO and OE lines converged on overlapping metabolic networks essential for starch biosynthesis and grain filling (Figure 1p). We propose that OsMADS29‐mediated repression fine‐tunes OsPUB77 expression to maintain metabolic equilibrium (Figure 1q). The transcriptional repression by OsMADS29 (Figure 1n,o) likely prevents excessive OsPUB77 expression and the attendant over‐ubiquitination of target proteins, which could disrupt the starch synthesis pathway. Optimal OsPUB77 activity ensures starch accumulation and endosperm integrity, preventing chalkiness and grain breakage. Both insufficient and excessive OsPUB77 disrupt starch deposition, reducing HMRR.

In conclusion, our study establishes the OsMADS29‐OsPUB77 module as a critical rheostat for HMRR, in which precise control of OsPUB77 safeguards starch homeostasis. This axis provides an actionable target for improving rice milling yield through precision breeding.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32272085), Scientific and Technological Plan of Guangzhou (2024A04J7152), Special Funding for the Construction of the High‐Level Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NYQS202606, R2026PY‐BJ001), Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2025A1515012969), Elite Rice Plan of GDRRI (2024YG07) and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Rice Science and Technology (2023B1212060042).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Data S1: pbi70603‐sup‐0001‐DataS1.docx.

PBI-24-3739-s001.docx (1.7MB, docx)

Tables S1–S6: pbi70603‐sup‐0002‐TablesS1‐S6.xlsx.

PBI-24-3739-s002.xlsx (39.2KB, xlsx)

Contributor Information

Xin Luan, Email: luanxin@gdaas.cn.

Junliang Zhao, Email: zhao_junliang@gdaas.cn.

Wu Yang, Email: yangwu@gdaas.cn.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequencing data have been submitted to the NGDC database (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/bioproject/) under BioProject number PRJCA026257. More details were available in Supporting Information files.

References

  1. Deng, Z. , Liu Y., Gong C., Chen B., and Wang T.. 2022. “ Waxy Is an Important Factor for Grain Fissure Resistance and Head Rice Yield as Revealed by a Genome‐Wide Association Study.” Journal of Experimental Botany 73, no. 19: 6942–6954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ma, B. , Zhang L., and He Z.. 2023. “Understanding the Regulation of Cereal Grain Filling: The Way Forward.” Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 65, no. 2: 526–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Nayar, S. , Sharma R., Tyagi A. K., and Kapoor S.. 2013. “Functional Delineation of Rice MADS29 Reveals Its Role in Embryo and Endosperm Development by Affecting Hormone Homeostasis.” Journal of Experimental Botany 64, no. 14: 4239–4253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sreenivasulu, N. 2019. Rice Grain Quality. Humana. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, R. , You X., Zhang C., et al. 2022. “An ORFeome of Rice E3 Ubiquitin Ligases for Global Analysis of the Ubiquitination Interactome.” Genome Biology 23, no. 1: 154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, W. , Mauleon R., Hu Z., et al. 2018. “Genomic Variation in 3010 Diverse Accessions of Asian Cultivated Rice.” Nature 557, no. 7703: 43–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhu, M. , Liu Y., Jiao G., et al. 2024. “The Elite Eating Quality Alleles Wx(b) and ALK(b) Are Regulated by OsDOF18 and Coordinately Improve Head Rice Yield.” Plant Biotechnology Journal 22, no. 6: 1582–1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data S1: pbi70603‐sup‐0001‐DataS1.docx.

PBI-24-3739-s001.docx (1.7MB, docx)

Tables S1–S6: pbi70603‐sup‐0002‐TablesS1‐S6.xlsx.

PBI-24-3739-s002.xlsx (39.2KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequencing data have been submitted to the NGDC database (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/bioproject/) under BioProject number PRJCA026257. More details were available in Supporting Information files.


Articles from Plant Biotechnology Journal are provided here courtesy of Society for Experimental Biology (SEB) and the Association of Applied Biologists (AAB) and John Wiley and Sons, Ltd

RESOURCES