Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2026 Apr 14;330(5):C1474–C1490. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00035.2026

Overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ promote distinct phenotypes of skeletal muscle fibrosis and stiffness, with PDGFRβ also driving muscle growth

Mariola Gimla 1,*, Szczepan Olszewski 1,*, Jacob L Brown 1,2, Christiana J Raymond-Pope 1, Sandra Rigsby 1, Frederick F Peelor III 1, Hae Ryong Kwon 3, Longbiao Yao 3, Lorin E Olson 3, Jordan D Fuqua 1,#, Benjamin F Miller 1,4,#
PMCID: PMC13206643  NIHMSID: NIHMS2166381  PMID: 41979571

Abstract

Background:

Fibrosis accumulates in skeletal muscle over time and leads to greater muscle rigidity, stiffness, and increased risk of injuries. However, investigations of appropriate experimental models to study the mechanisms through which muscle fibrosis occurs are often confounded by injury or disease. The contribution of platelet-derived growth factor receptors alpha and beta (PDGFRα or PDGFRβ) to muscle fibrosis is yet to be clarified. We hypothesized that both receptors would promote extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and fibrosis, causing muscle stiffening and weakness, with sex-specific differences arising due to hormonal influences on receptors.

Methods:

To test this hypothesis, we used a mouse model with inducible overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ signaling and assessed various indicators of muscle function, metabolism, motor coordination, exercise capacity, collagen deposition, and muscle stiffness.

Results:

Overactive PDGFRα led to higher collagen deposition, collagen crosslinking, and AGE/LOX protein levels, all of which correlated with greater muscle stiffness compared to controls. Overactive PDGFRβ resulted in greater muscle mass and lower fat mass and had higher collagen deposition in female mice compared to controls. There were also sex-specific differences with fibrotic remodeling, muscle stiffness, and muscle size in response to overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ signaling.

Conclusion:

These findings establish PDGFRα and PDGFRβ signaling as distinct regulators of muscle remodeling and establish overactive PDGFRα as a mouse model to study skeletal muscle fibrosis in the absence of other confounding variables.

Keywords: Collagen, Crosslinking, Isotope labelling, Muscle function, Muscle hypertrophy

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2166381-f0001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Skeletal muscle extracellular matrix (ECM) is essential for muscle structure as it provides a framework for myofibers, nerve supply, capillaries, and other supporting cells (1). Muscle ECM also plays an essential role in force transmission (2, 3) and mechanotransduction (4–6). Although ECM consists of multiple components such as glycoproteins, proteoglycans, and glycosaminoglycans, the predominant protein component is collagen. With age and with certain metabolic disorders (e.g., insulin resistance) there is higher collagen abundance, collagen crosslinking, and fibrosis (7) leading to stiffer and less functional skeletal muscle.

There are three types of cells that produce and secrete collagen in mouse skeletal muscle: fibroblasts, fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs), and skeletal muscle progenitor cells (8). Platelet derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR) alpha (α) and/or beta (β) are found on each of these three cell types and can promote their deposition of collagen in different tissues (9–15). During development, elevated PDGFRα signaling in mice leads to increased connective tissue growth in multiple organs, including skeletal muscle, leading to excessive and widespread fibrosis (16–18). Although PDGFRβ is less studied than PDGFRα, PDGFRβ lineage cells have been shown to shift to a fibrotic phenotype in skeletal muscles of aged mice (10). Despite the progress in understanding PDGFR signaling, the relative contributions of overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ activity in promoting excessive deposition of collagen and fibrosis is unknown, and having an established model of fibrosis could help identify mechanisms of muscle fibrosis.

A major limitation in advancing our understanding, and therefore treatment, of muscle fibrosis is the availability of appropriate experimental models to study the mechanisms through which muscle fibrosis occurs. Animal models used to study muscle fibrosis often include dystrophic mouse models such as the mdx mouse, a model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (1, 19), or non-dystrophic injury models that include lacerations, tenotomy, crushing, or chemically-induced injury (1). Each of these models presents other confounding variables (e.g., severe muscle wasting or injury-induced trauma) that limit applicability to mechanisms responsible for fibrosis. Therefore, animal models are needed that facilitate the independent effects of fibrosis on muscle without affecting other aspects of muscle health.

The goal of this study was to determine whether overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ leads to skeletal muscle fibrosis and impaired function. We hypothesized that both overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ would result in skeletal muscle fibrosis, muscle stiffness, and impaired muscle function. Because estrogen has been shown to induce PDGFR expression (20), we also hypothesized that there would be sex-related differences in these two models. Secondarily, we sought to identify a new model to study the mechanisms of muscle fibrosis that was not complicated by muscle damage or a disease model. To accomplish these goals, we used two different inducible mouse models that express a gain-of-function of either PDGFRα or PDGFRβ. While there were overlapping outcomes between the two mutant models, we found that overactive PDGFRα leads to significant muscle fibrosis and stiffness while overactive PDGFRβ was not fibrotic and leads to markedly higher muscle mass and a lower fat mass. Each model also showed sex-related differences in multiple physiological outcomes like collagen crosslinking, treadmill exercise capacity, force production, and muscle stiffness. Whereas the overactive PDGFRα mouse could be useful for studying fibrosis independent of muscle damage or disease, the overactive PDGFRβ has a hypertrophic phenotype that may be useful for other mechanistic studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal models

We maintained all mouse strains on a mixed C57BL/129 genetic background. The bKFlp and aKFlp alleles were made in 129 genetic background ES cells, while the remaining alleles have a C57BL6 background. All animal comparisons were age-matched, and we used littermate controls whenever possible. We used both male and female mice to test the effect of sex. We sought to create mice where overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ could be expressed from their endogenous loci selectively in PDGFRα-expressing cells. To create the tamoxifen-inducible PDGFRα gain-of-function model, we bred globally expressed Ubc-CreERtg (JAX:007001) (21) and PdgfraK-Flp knockin mice (JAX:038627) (22). Note that these mice have overactive PDGFRα signaling in all Pdgfra positive cells systemically, not just in skeletal muscle. To create the tamoxifen-inducible PDGFRβ gain-of-function model, we bred mice carrying PdgfraCreER (JAX:032770) (23) and Stat1flox (JAX:032054) (24) alleles with PdgfrbK-Flp knockin mice. Stat1flox was included in the PDGFRβ gain-of-function model because previous work has shown that elevated PDGFRβ signaling leads to early lethality due to excessive Stat1-induced inflammation (25). Ubc-CreERtg was not used for PDGFRβ because this would lead to global deletion of Stat1 and expression of overactive PDGFRβ in PDGFRα-negative cell types. The PdgfrbK-Flp knock-in mice have the same design as PdgfraK-Flp: a floxed stop cassette and cDNA encoding a constitutively active Pdgfrb gene (mutation: D849V; also known as PDGFRβK), with a T2A-flpo sequence replacing the PDGFRβK stop codon, were inserted into the Pdgfrb gene. These mice have overactive PDGFRβ signaling and Stat1 knockout in all Pdgfra positive cells systemically, not just in skeletal muscle. Although systemic changes likely contribute to the observed muscle phenotypes in both PDGFRα and PDGFRβ models, systemic alterations are a recognized feature that contribute to muscle fibrosis with metabolic disorders, chronic inflammation, and aging (26). Thus, these models remain appropriate for determining whether increased PDGFRα or PDGFRβ signaling is sufficient to drive fibrotic remodeling in adult skeletal muscle. Control mice were littermates with Cre but without PdgfraK-Flp or PdgfrbK-Flp. We prepared tamoxifen (Tmx) as a 20mg/ml stock in corn oil. To induce Cre recombination at 4-months-old, we gavaged all mice three times with 100 mg Tmx/kg bw. We housed mice in the vivarium at the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation under the care of the Department of Comparative Medicine. We group-housed animals with ad libitum access to food and water in a room on a 12:12 h light:dark cycle under constant temperature and humidity control. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation approved all procedures performed on mice. For ease of reading, PDGFR mutant mice will be identified as PDGFR+ and control mice will be identified as CON.

Study design

After induction of recombination at 4 months of age, the mice were aged to 7 months when they underwent a battery of tests that was spread out over 2 months to limit animal stress (Figure 1A). Most mice were used for all outcomes; however, samples used vary across ex vivo assays due to the exclusion of tissue preparations that did not meet predefined quality criteria necessary for successful assay completion (e.g., suboptimal sample preparation). Specific sample sizes are indicated in figure legends. Seven days before the tissue collection, we injected mice intraperitoneally (i.p.) with a bolus of 99% D2O, equivalent to 5% of the body water pool (7, 27, 28). Following i.p. injection animals had ad lib access to 8% D2O-enriched drinking water. Prior to harvest, we measured in vivo muscle contractile function. After euthanasia with CO2 and cervical dislocation we collected blood through cardiac puncture and harvested and weighed lower limb skeletal muscles. We then put the right extensor digitorum longus muscle (EDL) in oxygenated Ringer’s solution and measured ex vivo muscle stimulation and passive stiffness. All other right limb muscles were trimmed of fat and connective tissues, and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Left limb muscles were prepared for histology. We also measured tibia length and collected bone marrow and plasma. Physiological measurements, histology, microscopy, and morphological analyses were performed with the investigator blinded.

Figure 1. Mice with overactive PDGFRβ signaling have greater body mass, lean mass, and less fat mass.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Study design for PDGFRα and PDGFRβ mice (image created using Biorender). Changes in body mass over length of intervention for (B) PDGFRα and (C) PDGFRβ mice. Percentage of fat and lean mass in (D) PDGFRα and (E) PDGFRβ mice (n=7–12). Individual wet muscle mass (GA, PLA, SOL, TA, and EDL) normalized to tibia length from (F) PDGFRα and (G) PDGFRβ mice (n=7–9). Representative images of MHC fiber type staining, myofiber mean cross-sectional area (CSA) and total fiber number, CSA per fiber type, and distribution of fiber size in (H, I, J, K) PDGFRα and (L, M, N, O) PDGFRβ mice (n=7–8). Gastrocnemius (GA), plantaris (PLA), soleus (SOL), tibialis anterior (TA), and extensor digitorum longus (EDL), Main Effect (ME). In panel B and C, asterisk (*) indicates difference between CON and Mutant. Data are means ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Body composition

We measured body composition at 7 months of age using EchoMRI™−500 Body Composition Analyzer (Echo Medical Systems, Houston, TX, USA). Mice were placed in a ventilated plastic canister while being held immobile during assessments.

Endurance capacity

We acclimated mice to the treadmill (Treadmill Simplex II, Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA) for three days by running at 10 m/min for 10 minutes each day. On the fourth day, we tested animals with an initial speed of 10 m/min for 10 minutes at a 5% incline. At this point, we gradually increased the speed by 2 m/min until the mice were exhausted. We calculated the total work and max power (29) performed during the treadmill run:

WorkJ=bodymassKg*gravity9.81msec2*verticalspeedmsec*angle*timesec
PowerW=bodymassKg*gravity9.81msec2*verticalspeed(msec*angle)

We calculated max power by using the max vertical velocity which occurred at the time just prior to failure. We calculated work and power because PDGFRβ+ mice weighed significantly more than CON. An electric grid and brush located at the end of the treadmill were used to encourage the animals to run. We terminated the test when a mouse stopped responding to tail brushing/electric grid continuously for 3 seconds. We assessed blood lactate and blood glucose before and at the termination of the test by tail bleeding.

Rotarod

We placed mice in home cages in the testing room for at least 1 hour before testing to minimize the effects of stress on behavior during testing. We acclimated mice to the rotarod (Rota-Rod ENV-577 | ENV-577M, Med Associates, Fairfax, VT, USA) for three days. On the first day, mice were placed on the apparatus at a speed of 4 rpm for 60 seconds in 6 different trials with 5 minutes rest between trials. Next day for 4 rpm × 4 sets and 10 rpm × 4 sets for 60 seconds each. On the last day of acclimatization, 4 rpm × 4 sets and 20 rpm × 4 sets for 60 seconds each. We tested animals on the fourth day with an initial speed of 4 rpm accelerated to 40 rpm in 5 minutes. The test was terminated when the animal fell off the rotating rod. We repeated the procedure for a total of four trials separated by 5-minute intervals.

In vivo muscle contractile function

We assessed muscle function in plantar flexors by stimulating the tibial nerve, according to our previously published methods (30). In summary, the knee of the mouse was secured between pivots, and the foot was placed in and secured to the foot plate attached to a force transducer at a 90⁰ angle. Two needle electrodes (monopolar PTFE coated stainless steel) (Chalgren Enterprises, Gilroy, CA) were used for percutaneous stimulation of the tibial nerve. Tetanic isometric contractions at optimal length were elicited by stimulations of 150 Hz for 300 msec using the 1300A: 3-in-1 Whole Animal System (Aurora Scientific Inc, Aurora, ON, Canada). We collected and analyzed data to determine maximal muscle torque using the Dynamic Muscle Analysis software (ASI 611A v.5.321, Aurora Scientific Inc, Ontario, Canada). Additional contractile parameters from the tetanic curve were also evaluated, including average rates of contraction and relaxation and the time to maximal contraction.

Ex vivo skeletal muscle specific force

We conducted studies of limb muscle isometric function as previously described (31, 32). Mice were sacrificed, and the EDL muscle was excised and immediately placed in oxygenated Krebs buffer for dissection. One end of the muscle was tied to a Dual-Mode Muscle Lever System (300C-LR, Aurora Scientific Inc, Aurora, Canada) and the other end onto a hook. Muscles were placed at optimal length and allowed 10 min of thermoequilibration to the desired temperature (32°C). Thereafter, measurements of maximal force were initiated. In all electrical stimulations, a supramaximal current (600–800 mA) of 0.25 ms pulse duration was delivered through a stimulator (701 C, Aurora Scientific Inc.), while train duration for isometric contractions was 300 ms. Following ex vivo muscle stimulation, we equilibrated the EDL in oxygenated Krebs buffer for 10 minutes and then measured passive stress using a modified protocol (33). We stretched the muscle from the previously determined optimal length (Lo) using an eight-step passive stretch protocol without electrical stimulation, applying 5% Lo strain increments every 2 seconds from 100–140% Lo. After the final stretch, we removed the muscle and recorded the mass. We collected and analyzed all data using commercial software (DMC and DMA, Aurora Scientific).

D2O labeling and protein synthesis

We measured protein synthesis by determining deuterium incorporation into protein of gastrocnemius muscles as previously described (7, 28, 34–36). To measure the synthesis of subcellular fractions, we homogenized and then fractionated skeletal muscle tissue according to our previously published procedures (7, 28, 34–36). We then ran derivatized samples of alanine on an Agilent 7890A GC coupled to an Agilent 5975C MS. We determined body water enrichment on serum using a Liquid Water Isotope Analyzer (LWIA-45-EP, Los Gatos Research, San Jose, CA). We used rates of tracer incorporation to calculate protein fractional synthesis rates (FSR, %/day) as performed previously in our lab (7, 28, 34–36).

Glucose regulation

We performed glucose tolerance tests (GTT) after 6h of fasting, ~2pm (fasting started ~8am). Briefly, we transferred animals to clean cages without food at the beginning of the fasting period, and the test was initiated with a baseline assessment of glycaemia via tail bleeding with a glucometer (CONTOUR®NEXT EZ, Ascensia Diabetes, New Jersey USA). Subsequently, we performed an i.p. injection of a glucose solution prepared in saline (2 g/kg body weight). We measured blood glucose at 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after the glucose injection. We performed insulin tolerance tests (ITT) after 4h of fasting, ~2 pm (fasting started ~10am). We assessed baseline levels of blood glucose and then i.p. injected insulin solution prepared in saline (0.75 U/kg of body weight; Humulin R, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN). We measured blood glucose at 15, 30, and 60 min after insulin injection. On a separate day, we transferred mice to clean cages without food and then measured blood glucose with a glucometer (CONTOUR®NEXT EZ, Ascensia Diabetes, New Jersey USA) at the end of a 16-hour fasting period at 8 pm.

Pepsin collagen solubility and hydroxyproline assay

To quantify the proportions of mature cross-linked collagen and non-cross-linked and immature cross-linked collagen in gastrocnemius muscles, we treated ~30 mg of tissue with pepsin as previously described (7). We determined the collagen concentration in the pepsin-soluble and pepsin-insoluble fractions using a hydroxyproline (OHP) assay as we previously described (7). We measured concentration through absorbance reading at 558 nm with the BioTek Synergy H1 microplate reader (Agilent Technologies Santa Clara, CA, US).

Quantification of pyridinium cross-links

To quantify pyridinium crosslinks, we measured pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline (P&D) using the MicroVue PYD EIA enzyme immunoassay (Quidel Corporation: San Diego, CA 92121, USA) following the manufacturer`s instructions. We measured concentration through absorbance reading at 405 nm with the BioTek Synergy H1 microplate reader (Agilent Technologies Santa Clara, CA, US).

Quantification of Myostatin

To measure myostatin in plasma we used a GDF11-K01 mouse myostatin/GDF8 ELISA Kit (Eagle Biosciences, Inc., Nashua, NH 03063, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. We measured concentration through absorbance reading at 450 nm with the BioTek Synergy H1 microplate reader (Agilent Technologies Santa Clara, CA, US).

Immunoblot analysis

Skeletal muscle samples were prepared, processed, and analyzed as described previously (28). We prepared primary antibody dilutions as follows: lysyl oxidase (LOX) (Novus Biologicals, NBP2–24877, 1:1000), advanced glycation end products (AGEs) (Abcam, ab23722, 1:500), total p70S6 kinase (Cell Signaling Technology [CST] 9202, 1:1000) and phospho-p70S6K (Thr389) (CST 9205, 1:1000), total ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) (CST 2217, 1:1000) and phospho-rpS6 (Ser235/236) (CST 4858, 1:1000), total 4EBP1 (CST 9452, 1:1000) and phospho-4EBP1 (Thr37/46) (CST 9459, 1:1000). We used primary antibodies with the LI-COR secondary antibody IRDye 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (LI-COR Biotech 926–32211, 1:10,000). We normalized results for protein expression to Ponceau stain. Due to limited lanes within a gel, we ran all Western blots with one sex per gel to be able to directly compare between mutant and control animals.

Histology, fluorescence/confocal microscopy, and myofiber diameter

Upon harvesting, gastrocnemius muscles were directly embedded in tissue frozen medium (Tissue-Tek® O.C.T., Fisher-Scientific) and frozen in liquid nitrogen cooled isopentane for subsequent analysis. We obtained serial sections of muscle samples (10 μm) from the middle section of the gastrocnemius at a temperature of −24–25°C using a Cryotome Leica 3050 (Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL, US.)

We determined fiber type and fiber size by post-fixing sections in pre-cooled acetone. Next, we permeabilized muscle sections in PBS with 1% Tween 20, blocked with M.O.M. solution (MKB 2213, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), rinsed and blocked again in normal goat serum (NGS, Sigma, G-9023) diluted to 5% in PBST (5% NGS), and then incubated overnight with primary antibodies: MHC Type-I (BA-F8, 1:250), Type-IIa (SC-71s, 1:250), Type-IIb (BF-F3s, 1:250) from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (University of Iowa, Iowa City), and Laminin (L9393, 1:500) from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) at 4°C. On the following day, we incubated samples for 1 hour with corresponding isotype specific secondary antibodies in 5% NGS, and then covered with ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were washed 3 times with PBST after each of the steps outlined above except after the second blocking where no wash was performed. Also, MHC Type-IIx fibers were denoted as “black” fibers (i.e., absence of color/dye). We imaged slides using a Zeiss LSM710 Confocal Microscope (Oberkochen, Germany). We measured muscle fiber cross-sectional area (CSA) using Myovision analysis software (Myovision 2.0 software, University of Kentucky).

To evaluate capillarity, we stained muscle sections with CD31 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 14–0311-82, 1:100), laminin (Sigma-Aldrich, L9393, 1:500), and DAPI (Invitrogen, 1:10000), using previously described procedures (34). The following corresponding isotype specific conjugated secondary antibodies were used: Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen, A21428, 1:200) and Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen, A21247, 1:200). We then imaged whole tissue sections using a Zeiss Axioscan 7 slide scanner and a 20X objective (Plan-Apochromat 20x/0.8 M27). Images were exported and analyzed using Myovision analysis software (Myovision 2.0 software, University of Kentucky) (37).

To evaluate collagen content and organization (i.e., loosely and densely packed collagen) spatially, we stained muscle sections with picrosirius red (PSR) (Abcam, ab246832), as previously described (38). Whole tissue sections were imaged using a Zeiss Axioscan 7 slide scanner with a diascopic cross-linear polarized filter using a 20X objective (EC Plan-Neofluar 20x/0.50 Pol M27). After adjusting white balance and focus parameters, a reference brightfield image and subsequent polarized image of the whole muscle section were captured. We exported images and used Fiji (ImageJ) to conduct thresholding analysis of green and red/yellow collagen staining within the polarized images of each gastrocnemius section. Images were binarized and the area fraction of green (loosely packed) and red/yellow (densely packed) were quantified using the Color Pixel Counter plugin and presented as a percentage of total area.

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as mean ± SEM with individual data points shown for each mouse. Within both PDGFRα and PDGFβ experiments we used a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (genotype by sex) followed by Sidaks post hoc analyses where appropriate. Main effects are shown when significantly different. For body mass over time we used a two-way repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc analyses. We analyzed Western blots with unpaired t-tests. For our correlation between muscle stiffness and collagen we used Pearson R correlation. Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical tests were performed with GraphPad Prism, v. 10 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

RESULTS

Overactive PDGFRβ leads to greater lean mass and less fat mass.

Both PDGFRα and PDGFRβ gain-of-function mutations are well established to result in constitutively overactive signaling (22, 25). We first determined the effects of overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ signaling on body composition (mice with overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ hereafter denoted by “+” (PDGFRα+ and PDGFRβ+) and littermate controls denoted as CON). We showed that while there was no difference in body mass between female CON and PDGFRα+, body mass was significantly higher in male PDGFRα+ and male and female PDGFRβ+ mice compared to their respective CON (Figure 1 B and C) (Supplemental Figure 1A and B). We measured body composition with EchoMRI prior to euthanasia and found that there were no differences in lean or fat masses between PDGFRα+ and CON (Figure 1D). However, male and female PDGFRβ+ had less % fat mass and greater % lean mass compared to their CON (Figure 1E).

There was a main effect of genotype for hindlimb muscle mass in the female PDGFRα mice with many of the hindlimb muscles weighing less in PDGFRα+ compared to their CON (Figure 1F) (Supplemental Figure 1C). There was also a main effect of genotype for both male and female PDGFRβ mice with many of the hindlimb muscles weighing more in PDGFRβ+ mice compared to CON (Figure 1G) (Supplemental Figure 1D). Because PDGFR signaling regulates bone growth, we measured tibia length and showed that tibia length was longer in PDGFRβ+ compared to CON while EDL length was also longer in PDGFRα+ in both sexes and in female PDGFRβ+ relative to their respective CON (Supplemental Figure 1E-H). Because of this longer bone length, we normalized muscle mass by tibia length (Figure 1F and G).

For fiber type CSA there was a main effect of genotype for both male and female groups. PDGFRα+ female mutants had lower gastrocnemius (GA) mean myofiber CSA compared to their CON, and this lower CSA was only seen in the fast twitch (i.e., IIx and IIb) muscle fibers (Figure 1H–K).There was a main effect of genotype for the total number of fibers in GA muscles with a higher number of fibers in male PDGFRα+ compared to CON (Figure 1I). For PDGFRβ mice, both male and female mutants showed a rightward shift in myofiber CSA distribution compared to their respective CON (Figure 1L–O). Although there was no significant difference in myofiber CSA, there was a main effect of genotype for total number of fibers in GA muscles, and this combined with the rightward shift in myofiber size helps to account for higher muscle mass observed in PDGFRβ+ mice.

Capillary density is minimally affected by overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ signaling.

Because PDGF has been linked to insulin resistance (39), we wanted to determine whether overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ signaling altered insulin sensitivity or glucose handling. We showed no differences in GTT, ITT, or fasted blood glucose levels between PDGFRα+ or PDGFRβ+ and their respective CON; however, male PDGFRα+ had higher basal glucose levels compared to their CON (Supplemental Figure 2A-H).

Because PDGFRβ signaling can promote pericyte differentiation and angiogenesis (40), we investigated whether there was a change in capillary density in PDGFRα+ and PDGFRβ+ mice. Male PDGFRα+ mice had a higher capillary per myofiber ratio compared to female PDGFRα+ mice (Figure 2A–B). However, the distribution of capillary number per myofiber was shifted left for male PDGFRα+ mice compared to male CON, indicating a greater percentage of myofibers that had fewer capillaries compared to CON (Figure 2C). While PDGFRβ+ showed no differences in the capillaries per fiber or capillaries per area ratios for males or females, the capillaries per fiber distribution for males was shifted right compared to male CON, indicating a greater percentage of myofibers that had a higher number of capillaries compared to CON (Figure 2D–F).

Figure 2. Overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ signaling only minimally effects capillary density.

Figure 2.

Representative images of GA muscle stained for capillarity (CD31) in (A) PDGFRα and (B) PDGFRβ mice. Associated distribution of capillary number per fiber in (C) PDGFRα and (D) PDGFRβ mice, and corresponding capillary/fiber and capillary/area ratios in (E) PDGFRα and (F) PDGFRβ mice (n=6–7). Main Effect (ME). Data are means ± SEM. *p<0.05.

Overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ signaling modulates specific cellular signaling pathways.

Given the observed differences in muscle mass, we next examined whether muscle growth signaling and protein synthesis was different between genotypes. mTORC1 regulates muscle protein synthesis and growth. We examined mTORC1 signaling by probing for the mTORC1 downstream targets: 4EBP1, p70S6 Kinase, and rpS6 total and phosphorylated protein. We showed that total 4EBP1 protein was less in male PDGFRα+ mice compared to CON and that total and phosphorylated 4EBP1 protein were less in male PDGFRβ+ mice compared to CON (Figure 3A–D). However, there were no differences in p70S6 Kinase and rpS6 protein under any condition (Figure 3A–D).

Figure 3. Mice with overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ signaling minimally effect mTOR signaling but have altered myostatin levels.

Figure 3.

Representative immunoblots and quantification of mTOR singling (phospho and total 4EBP1, p70s6K, and S6K) in TA muscle for (A, B) PDGFRα and (C, D) PDGFRβ mice (n=7–8). Plasma myostatin concentration for (E) PDGFRα and (F) PDGFRβ mice (n=6–9). Myofibrillar fractional synthetic rates (FSR) over 7-day labeling period prior to euthanasia in GA muscle of (G) PDGFRα and (H) PDGFRβ mice (n=7–9). Main Effect (ME). Data are means ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Because changes in downstream mTORC1 signaling were minimal, we next examined growth and differentiation factor 8 (i.e., myostatin). Myostatin is a negative regulator of muscle hypertrophy, and we found that myostatin plasma levels were lower in male and female PDGFRα+ and in male PDGFRβ+ compared to CON (Figure 3E and F). Last, to determine whether there was higher muscle protein synthesis we administered deuterium oxide (D2O) to the animals for the last 7 days prior to harvest. There were no differences in myofibrillar protein synthesis in any of the groups (Figure 3G and H).

Collagen dynamics are differentially affected by overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ signaling.

Reanalysis of published single-cell RNA sequencing data (41) showed that both Pdgfra and Pdgfrb are co-expressed in endomysial, paramysial, and nerve fiber associated fibroblasts, indicating these populations as candidates for increased synthesis of collagen. On the other hand, Pdgfra expression is relatively low in perimysial fibroblasts and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), where Pdgfrb is more highly enriched (Supplemental Figure 3 A-E). PDGFRα and PDGFRβ signaling potentially increases the synthesis of collagen from fibroblasts and FAPs. To determine collagen abundance in skeletal muscle, we examined the amount of total, soluble, and insoluble collagen biochemically by measuring hydroxyproline content of these fractions in GA muscle.

We first showed main effects of sex and genotype for total, soluble, and insoluble collagen in PDGFRα+ mice. Second, we showed that male and female PDGFRα+ had more total and insoluble collagen compared to CON. Finally, we showed that female PDGFRα+ also had more soluble collagen compared to CON (Figure 4A). For PDGFRβ mice, there was a main effect of genotype for total and insoluble collagen abundance and a main effect of sex and genotype for soluble collagen abundance. Only total collagen was greater in female PDGFRβ+ compared to CON (Figure 4B).

Figure 4. Overactive PDGFRα signaling results in a greater amount of insoluble and crosslinked collagen while overactive PDGFRβ model shows greater amounts of collagen only in female mice.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

GA muscle was used for hydroxyproline, picrosirius red staining, and pyridinium crosslinks (A-H). Total, soluble, and insoluble collagen concentration in muscle for (A) PDGFRα and (B) PDGFRβ mice (n=7–8). Representative picrosirius red (PSR) staining and collagen quantification in (C, D) PDGFRα and (E, F) PDGFRβ models (n=7–8). Total, soluble, and insoluble pyridinium crosslinks muscle for (G) PDGFRα and (H) PDGFRβ mice (n=7–8). Representative immunoblots and quantification of total AGE and LOX protein abundance in TA muscle for (I, K) PDGFRα and (J, L) PDGFRβ mice (n=7–8). Main Effect (ME). Data are means ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

We also stained GA muscle cross sections with PSR. There was a main effect of genotype for densely packed collagen for PDGFRα+ mice indicating female PDGFRα+ had a higher abundance of densely packed collagen compared to CON. There was no difference in densely packed collagen for PDGFRβ+ compared to CON (Figure 4C–F).

Collagen crosslinking is a hallmark of fibrosis and decreases muscle function and force generation. We showed main effects of P&D in total collagen and the insoluble collagen fraction of both PDGFRα and PDGFRβ groups. We also showed that P&D abundance in the total collagen fraction was greater in PDGFRα+ compared to CON and that this difference was entirely driven by higher abundance in the insoluble collagen fraction (Figure 4G and H). Female PDGFRβ+ had higher P&D in the total collagen fraction compared to CON, and although there was more P&D in the soluble collagen fraction of female PDGFRβ+, the majority of P&D was found in the insoluble collagen fraction (Figure 4G and H). As a final indicator of collagen structure/crosslinking, we measured LOX and AGE in TA muscles. We showed that both male and female PDGFRα+ had more LOX, and female PDGFRα+ had more AGE compared to CON (Figure 4I and J). There were no significant differences in LOX or AGE abundance in PDGFRβ+ compared to CON (Figure 4K and L).

PDGFRα and PDGFRβ signaling modulate muscle function and stiffness.

We used several tests to determine how changes in fibrosis impact muscle function. First, we tested motor coordination using rotarod and saw no differences in either sex of PDGFRα+ compared to CON. There was, however, a main effect of genotype in which the genotype had shorter latency to fall (Figure 5A). PDGFRβ+ mice had a shorter latency to fall compared to CON in both sexes with a main effect of genotype (Figure 5C).

Figure 5. Overactive PDGFRα signaling results in stiffer muscles in both male and female mice while overactive PDGFRβ results in stiffer muscles only in female mice.

Figure 5.

Rotarod, treadmill run distance, and maximal treadmill power output for (A, B) PDGFRα and (C,D) PDGFRβ mice (n=7–9). In vivo maximal absolute and normalized (normalized to muscle mass) isometric torque for (E) PDGFRα and (H) PDGFRβ mice (n=8–12). Ex vivo maximal specific force and passive stretch values for (F, G) PDGFRα and (I, J) PDGFRβ mice (n=8 12). Main Effect (ME). In panel G and J, asterisk (*) indicates difference between CON and Mutant. Data are means ± SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

We next performed maximal treadmill capacity and found that female PDGFRα+ ran a shorter distance before exhaustion compared to CON and had a main effect of genotype (Figure 5B). Similarly, female PDGFRβ+ mice also ran a shorter distance before exhaustion, and there were no differences in distance run with male mice (Figure 5D). There was a main effect of genotype in which the mutant genotype ran a shorter distance before exhaustion (Figure 5D). It is important to note that each group ran to a similar level of exhaustion as indicated by the change in blood lactate levels with the treadmill test (Supplemental Figure 4C and D). Because body mass was different between mutant and CON mice, we measured max power output and total work performed, both of which incorporate body mass. We observed a main effect of sex for work performed (joules), as male mice had higher work output than female mice during the treadmill bout across both PDGFRα and PDGFRβ groups (Supplemental Figure 4A and B). There were no differences in maximal power output with PDGFR+ mice (Figure 5B). We showed that there was a main effect of sex and genotype regarding maximal power output in PDGFRβ+ mice, with males and PDGFRβ+ mice generating more power compared to female and CON respectively (Figure 5D). Female PDGFRβ+ mice generated higher maximal power compared to CON (Figure 5D).

Last, we examined how overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ affected skeletal muscle strength and muscle stiffness. We first measured in vivo maximal force production of the plantarflexors (GA, PL, SOL) by electrically stimulating the tibial nerve. We showed that there was a main effect of sex and genotype in absolute in vivo torque and that values were lower in female PDGFRα+, with no differences observed in male PDGFRα+ compared to CON (Figure 5E). We also showed a main effect of sex and genotype for absolute torque, and that absolute torque was greater in both male and female PDGFRβ+ mice compared to CON (Figure 5H). When we normalized maximal in vivo torque to muscle mass, the main effect of sex remained but there were no differences between any PDGFRβ+ and their respective CON (Figure 5H). Further evaluation of the maximal torque curve showed that female PDGFRα+ had the slowest rates of contraction and relaxation, while both male and female PDGFRβ+ had higher rates of contraction and relaxation compared to CON (Supplemental Figure 5C-D). To determine the neural-independent specific force of the muscle, we used an isolated EDL in physiological solution and electrically stimulated the muscle to measure ex vivo contractile force. Female PDGFRα+ and male PDGFRβ+ had impaired force production compared to their respective CON (Figure 5F and I).

To test muscle stiffness, we passively stretched the EDL muscle while simultaneously measuring force produced from the stretch. Male and female PDGFRα+ mice generated more force during passive stretch compared to CON in absolute (Figure 5G) and when normalized to muscle CSA (Supplemental Figure 5A, showing that PDGFRα+ have stiffer muscles. We also showed that female PDGFRβ+ generated more force with passive stretch compared to CON, however, we saw no differences in force generated during passive stretch test in male PDGFRβ+ (Figure 5J) or in either sex when normalized to muscle CSA (Supplemental Figure 5B.

To gain greater insight into which aspects of collagen (i.e., total, soluble, insoluble, or crosslinked collagen) may contribute most to muscle stiffness, we correlated these outcomes with muscle stiffness. We show that for PDGFRα mice, insoluble, crosslinked insoluble, and total collagen had a relatively low, but significant positive correlation with muscle stiffness while soluble did not have a significant correlation (Supplemental Figure 6A, B, D, F, H). For the PDGFRβ mice, only crosslinked insoluble collagen had a low, but significant positive correlation with muscle stiffness (Supplemental Figure 6A, C, E, G, I).

DISCUSSION

We initially hypothesized that both overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ signaling would promote skeletal muscle fibrosis through collagen deposition, leading to stiffer, and less functional muscle in mutant mice relative to their respective controls. We also hypothesized that overactive PDGFRα or PDGFRβ signaling would have sex-specific effects. Our results show that compared to CON, PDGFRα+ had a fibrotic phenotype as evidenced by higher collagen deposition, collagen crosslinking, and AGE/LOX protein levels, which all correlated with greater muscle stiffness. Although PDGFRβ+ had minor changes in some markers of collagen deposition, the notable changes seen were higher muscle mass, lower fat mass, and prominent sex-specific differences in collagen crosslinking and muscle stiffness. In sum, these findings highlight the contrasting roles of PDGFRα and PDGFRβ in adult skeletal muscle, with PDGFRα acting as a potent inducer of collagen deposition and fibrosis, and a previously undescribed role of PDGFRβ in promoting skeletal muscle hypertrophy in vivo. These findings also identify PDGFRα+ as a potential mouse model to study skeletal muscle fibrosis in the absence of aging, muscle damage, or other disease process.

Overactive PDGFRα Promotes Robust Fibrosis in Adult Skeletal Muscle

A notable finding of this study was the difference between the effects of overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ on collagen accumulation in skeletal muscle. Both male and female PDGFRα+ mice had a higher collagen concentration and amount of crosslinked and densely packed collagen compared to CON. Overactive PDGFRβ resulted in only slightly higher amounts of collagen deposition, which was present only in female mice. These results are important because an accumulation of more and stiffer/crosslinked collagen that is resistant to turnover is a hallmark of muscle fibrosis (7, 37).

Consistent with greater fibrosis, passive stretch of EDL muscles revealed markedly higher muscle stiffness in PDGFRα+ mice, with force generation 53% higher in males and 107% higher in females compared to their respective CON. Not only did higher insoluble and crosslinked collagen lead to stiffer muscles, but female PDGFRα+ mice had smaller type IIx and type IIb myofibers and lower specific force. However, we do not know if the changes in myofiber size are directly related to PDGFRα signaling, or secondary to fibrosis. Although motor deficits could reflect central nervous system or other systemic effects, the impaired ex vivo contractile force and increased passive stiffness observed in isolated muscles support a predominantly muscle intrinsic mechanism. The link between collagen accumulation/crosslinking and stiffness further suggests ECM driven functional limitations, though non-muscle contributions cannot be excluded.

Our study demonstrates that while overactive PDGFRα signaling caused a fibrotic phenotype, PDGFRβ did not. These findings imply that PDGFRα and PDGFRβ have distinct roles in skeletal muscle remodeling, with PDGFRα more directly linked to collagen accumulation and fibrosis. Consistent with this interpretation, reanalysis of publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing data showed substantial overlap in Pdgfra and Pdgfrb expression in endomysial, paramysial, and nerve fiber associated fibroblasts. However, Pdgfra expression was relatively low in perimysial and VSMCs compared to Pdgfrb, helping define the specific Pdgfra positive cell populations in which the gain-of-function mutation is active for both models.

Although we did not identify the mechanisms of how overactive PDGFRα promotes collagen deposition, previous studies have shown that PDGFRα positive cells differentiate into collagen type-I-producing cells that accumulate in fibrotic areas of muscle in mdx mice (42) and that constitutively active PDGFRα fibroblasts promote fibrosis during injury/repair (43). It is important to note that while previous studies demonstrate that PDGFRα promotes fibrosis in muscle during disease states or during injury/repair, there is a scarcity of data regarding the role of PDGFRα in skeletal muscle in the absence of damage or disease, and how PDGFRα activity may contribute to age-related fibrosis.

Previous data from our lab indicate that the accumulation of collagen in muscle with denervation (44) and aging (28) are not due to higher rates of collagen synthesis, but rather a slowing of collagen breakdown. This slowing is likely caused by increased cross-linking that impairs breakdown (45, 46). From the current study, it is not clear if PDGFRα+ caused higher rates of collagen synthesis followed by more cross-linking, or if PDGRα+ leads to more cross-linking that in turn slows breakdown and promotes fibrosis. When examining the concentration of crosslinks in proportion to total collagen amount, there are higher proportions of crosslinks in PDGFRα+ (57.8 nM/mg in female and 23.4 nM/mg in male) compared to CON (12.2 nM/mg in female and 11.5 nM/mg in male), particularly in female mice which had ~370% more. The higher proportion of crosslinks to collagen concentration in PDGRα+ raises the possibility that PDGRα may also have a role in activating crosslinking. With either possibility, the overactive PDGFRα promotes fibrosis independent of disease or injury and thus could be used as a model to isolate the impact of fibrosis on skeletal muscle.

Overactive PDGFRβ Leads to Skeletal Muscle Growth and Reduced Fat Mass

An unexpected finding was the effects that overactive PDGFRβ had on muscle mass and body composition. Compared to CON, PDGFRβ+ had higher overall body mass (38% higher in female and 20% higher in male mice) that was accompanied by substantially higher lean mass (86% more in female and 49% more in male mice). In male, but not female, PDGFRβ+ mice, this pronounced hypertrophy was associated with lower myostatin (GDF-8), a potent negative regulator of muscle growth (47). Given that PDGFRβ signaling promotes pericyte differentiation and angiogenesis (40), the rightward shift in capillary distribution in PDGFRβ+ mice may reflect enhanced vascular remodeling associated with muscle hypertrophy. Interestingly, circulating myostatin levels were also reduced in both male and female PDGFRα+ mice, yet muscle mass was unchanged in males and lower in females compared to CON. This discrepancy demonstrates that low myostatin alone is not sufficient to induce muscle growth with overactive PDGFRα signaling. These findings suggest that systemic factors, including those measured here (i.e., myostatin) and others, may contribute to the observed muscle phenotype, however, futures studies are required to identify the specific factors responsible.

Overactive PDGFRβ mice had greater maximal power output than controls during treadmill running, possibly due to more muscle mass, but at the cost of impaired motor coordination. These findings of enhanced output but reduced coordination may reflect biomechanical challenges brought about by excess body mass (48) and altered limb mechanics, as indicated by the visibly widened stance and modified gait in PDGFRβ+ mice (data not shown). In addition to identifying different mechanistic actions through which these two receptors signal as highlighted above, these data identify distinct functions of PDGFRα and PDGFRβ in muscle function and stiffness.

PDGFRβ signaling is linked to both adipogenic and fibrotic fates. For example, in aged muscle, PDGFRβ lineage cells acquire mesenchymal stem cell-like properties and express both adipogenic and fibrotic markers (49). Given these diverse functions, activation of PDGFRβ signaling could influence adipogenic or fibrotic outcomes in PDGFRβ+ mice. We found that overactive PDGFRβ signaling led to markedly lower fat mass (53% in females and 48% in males) compared to CON. Another study found that adipogenesis is enhanced in PDGFRβ knockout mice (22). These data shed light on the regulatory role of PDGFRβ in maintenance of fat mass. These data identify a novel role for PDGFRβ in promoting skeletal muscle hypertrophy and reducing fat mass in vivo, potentially through myostatin signaling and/or other signaling pathways not investigated in this current study.

Sex-Specific Differences Observed with Overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ

There were prominent sex-specific differences in this study for both PDGFRα and PDGFRβ groups. One significant sex difference was the large change in collagen composition. Female PDGFRα+ mice had higher levels of total, insoluble, and crosslinked collagen, as well as greater AGE and LOX content compared to male PDGFRα+ mice. Although less pronounced, similar trends were observed in female PDGFRβ+ mice, which had elevated P&D crosslinking compared to male counterparts. Female PDGFRβ+ mice also had stiffer muscles compared to male counterparts, likely due to higher P&D crosslinks. Despite higher P&D crosslinks in female PDGFRα+ mice, absolute muscle stiffness did not differ from male PDGFRα+ mice. However, when normalized to muscle CSA, female PDGFRα+ mice had higher stiffness compared to male PDGFRα+ mice.

Another sex-specific finding was the lower muscle mass in the female PDGFRα+ compared to CON, whereas these differences were not noted in male PDGFRα+ compared to their respective CON. Our data show that the smaller muscle mass in female PDGFRα+ was driven exclusively by lower type IIx and IIb myofiber size since type I and IIa fiber size were unaffected by PDGFRα+. Although direct regulation of sex hormones on PDGFR in skeletal muscle is lacking, our findings are consistent with the findings that estrogen and testosterone can modulate PDGF activity in other tissues and cell types (20, 50–52). Together, these findings underscore that there are sex-specific impacts of PDGFR-driven muscle remodeling.

Limitations, Recommendations, and Conclusions

One limitation of the current study is that we measured protein synthesis and other biochemical assays (i.e., mTORC1 signaling, myostatin) at a point when rapid changes were likely completed and there was a new steady state in muscle mass and other collagen-related outcomes. We approached this first experiment as an endpoint analysis after a sufficient period of time for the overactive PDGFR activity to potentially have an effect. To capture rapid changes would require an additional cohort that were euthanized at an earlier timepoint. As a result, it is likely that our biochemical assays missed earlier changes that led to body composition changes in PDGFRβ mice (e.g., higher lean/muscle mass and lower fat mass). Assessment of the ~2–6 weeks following tamoxifen induction may help capture the mechanisms driving body mass changes as they occur. In addition, unbiased approaches (e.g., proteomics, RNA sequencing, and transcriptional profiling) will be required to better define the mechanisms by which overactive PDGFRβ signaling contributes to hypertrophy and identify the cell types that contribute to this outcome. Given the lean phenotype observed in PDGFRβ+ mice, these findings raise the possibility of muscle-adipose cross-talk or broader inter-organ communication contributing to altered body composition (53).

Another limitation is that our labeling approach did not allow us to capture muscle collagen turnover. We have shown that to properly assess collagen, especially when fibrosis is expected, there needs to be a time-course labeling approach (e.g., 1, 3, 7, and 14 days) (7, 28). This approach allows determination of valid synthesis rates because it does not assume that the collagen pool fully turns over, which we have repeatedly shown to be true (7, 28, 44).

Both PDGFRβ+ and PDGFRβ CON mice are Stat1 deficient, as overactive PDGFRβ signaling causes early lethality through Stat1-driven inflammation (25). Lastly, while our study focused on skeletal muscle, our mutant mouse models are not muscle specific, limiting our ability to attribute effects solely to muscle-resident cells. However, these models had outcomes that were consistent with receptor signaling in the muscle.

In conclusion, our hypothesis was partially supported as overactive PDGFRα signaling led to fibrosis marked by deposition of insoluble and crosslinked collagen and greater muscle stiffness. In contrast, overactive PDGFRβ produced a sex-specific response with only female muscle exhibiting more collagen crosslinking, and to a lesser extent than overactive PDGFRα. Surprisingly, overactive PDGFRβ lead to larger muscle size and lower fat mass, suggesting a novel role for PDGFRβ signaling in skeletal muscle growth that warrants further mechanistic investigation. PDGFRα+ mice showed multiple indicators of fibrosis, highlighting the value of the PDGFRα model for studying fibrosis in the absence of other confounding injury or disease. Together, these findings establish PDGFRα and PDGFRβ signaling as distinct regulators of muscle remodeling and emphasize the importance of considering sex-specific outcomes when investigating mechanisms of muscle fibrosis (Graphical Abstract).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Figures: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31549666

NEW & NOTEWORTHY.

  • This study demonstrates that overactive PDGFRα and PDGFRβ signaling drive distinct and sex-specific skeletal muscle remodeling phenotypes.

  • Overactive PDGFRα induces robust fibrosis characterized by increased insoluble and crosslinked collagen, elevated LOX and AGE levels, and marked muscle stiffness. Thus, establishing a new model to study skeletal muscle fibrosis.

  • Overactive PDGFRβ unexpectedly promoted skeletal muscle hypertrophy and reduced fat mass with minimal fibrosis, revealing a previously unrecognized role in regulating muscle growth in vivo.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Preprint is available at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.01.02.697406v1.full Some images were created with BioRender.com. Graphical Abstract created in BioRender. Fuqua, J. (2026) https://BioRender.com/aai02m3.

GRANTS

J.D.Fuqua was supported by NIA K99/R00 MOSAIC: 1K99AG086524–01A1 grant and the NIA Training Grant: 5T32AG052363–04. B.F. Miller a VA Research Career Scientist was supported by VA Merit Awards: VA I01 BX005592 and VA I01 BX006508. L.E. Olson was supported by R01-AR073828 and R01-AR080896. J.L. Brown was supported by a VA Career Development Award (1 IK2BX005620–01A1).

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data will be made available upon request

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mahdy MAA (2019) Skeletal muscle fibrosis: an overview. Cell Tissue Res. 375, 575–588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Purslow PP (2010) Muscle fascia and force transmission. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 14, 411–417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pavan P, Monti E, Bondí M, Fan C, Stecco C, Narici M, Reggiani C, and Marcucci L (2020) Alterations of Extracellular Matrix Mechanical Properties Contribute to Age-Related Functional Impairment of Human Skeletal Muscles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vandenburgh H and Kaufman S (1979) In Vitro Model for Stretch-Induced Hypertrophy of Skeletal Muscle. Science (1979). 203, 265–268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burkholder TJ (2007) Mechanotransduction in skeletal muscle. Front. Biosci. 12, 174–191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fischer M, Rikeit P, Knaus P, and Coirault C (2016) YAP-Mediated Mechanotransduction in Skeletal Muscle. Front. Physiol. 7, 41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abbott CB, Lawrence MM, Kobak KA, Lopes EBP, Peelor FF, Donald EJ, Van Remmen H., Griffin TM., and Miller BF. (2021) A Novel Stable Isotope Approach Demonstrates Surprising Degree of Age-Related Decline in Skeletal Muscle Collagen Proteostasis. Function 2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chapman MA, Mukund K, Subramaniam S, Brenner D, and Lieber RL (2017) Three distinct cell populations express extracellular matrix proteins and increase in number during skeletal muscle fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 312, C131–C143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Contreras O, Córdova-Casanova A, and Brandan E (2021) PDGF-PDGFR network differentially regulates the fate, migration, proliferation, and cell cycle progression of myogenic cells. Cell. Signal. 84, 110036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lu A, Tseng C, Guo P, Gao Z, Whitney KE, Kolonin MG, and Huard J (2022) The role of the aging microenvironment on the fate of PDGFRβ lineage cells in skeletal muscle repair. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 13, 1–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Contreras O and Brandan E (2017) Fibro/adipogenic progenitors safeguard themselves: a novel mechanism to reduce fibrosis is discovered. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 11, 77–78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Contreras O, Cruz-Soca M, Theret M, Soliman H, Tung LW, Groppa E, Rossi FM, and Brandan E (2019) Cross-talk between TGF-β and PDGFRα signaling pathways regulates the fate of stromal fibro-adipogenic progenitors. J. Cell Sci. 132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yao L, Rathnakar BH, Kwon HR, Sakashita H, Kim JH, Rackley A, Tomasek JJ, Berry WL, and Olson LE (2022) Temporal control of PDGFRα regulates the fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition in wound healing. Cell Rep. 40, 111192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gao Z, Sasaoka T, Fujimori T, Oya T, Ishii Y, Sabit H, Kawaguchi M, Kurotaki Y, Naito M, Wada T, Ishizawa S, Kobayashi M, Nabeshima Y-I, and Sasahara M (2005) Deletion of the PDGFR-beta gene affects key fibroblast functions important for wound healing. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 9375–9389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yu J, Moon A, and Kim HR (2001) Both platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-alpha and PDGFR-beta promote murine fibroblast cell migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 282, 697–700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Olson LE and Soriano P (2009) Increased PDGFRα Activation Disrupts Connective Tissue Development and Drives Systemic Fibrosis. Dev. Cell 16, 303–313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun C, Berry WL, and Olson LE (2017) PDGFRα controls the balance of stromal and adipogenic cells during adipose tissue organogenesis. Development 144, 83–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Iwayama T, Steele C, Yao L, Dozmorov MG, Karamichos D, Wren JD, and Olson LE (2015) PDGFRα signaling drives adipose tissue fibrosis by targeting progenitor cell plasticity. Genes Dev. 29, 1106–1119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pessina P, Cabrera D, Morales MG, Riquelme CA, Gutiérrez J, Serrano AL, Brandan E, and Muñoz-Cánoves P (2014) Novel and optimized strategies for inducing fibrosis in vivo: focus on Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Skelet. Muscle 4, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gray K, Eitzman B, Raszmann K, Steed T, Geboff A, McLachlan J, and Bidwell M (1995) Coordinate regulation by diethylstilbestrol of the platelet-derived growth factor-A (PDGF-A) and -B chains and the PDGF receptor alpha- and beta-subunits in the mouse uterus and vagina: potential mediators of estrogen action. Endocrinology 136, 2325–2340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ruzankina Y, Pinzon-Guzman C, Asare A, Ong T, Pontano L, Cotsarelis G, Zediak VP, Velez M, Bhandoola A, and Brown EJ (2007) Deletion of the developmentally essential gene ATR in adult mice leads to age-related phenotypes and stem cell loss. Cell Stem Cell 1, 113–126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sun C, Sakashita H, Kim J, Tang Z, Upchurch GM, Yao L, Berry WL, Griffin TM, and Olson LE (2020) Mosaic Mutant Analysis Identifies PDGFRα/PDGFRβ as Negative Regulators of Adipogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 26, 707–721.e5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chung MI, Bujnis M, Barkauskas CE, Kobayashi Y, and Hogan BLM (2018) Niche-mediated BMP/SMAD signaling regulates lung alveolar stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Development 145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Klover PJ, Muller WJ, Robinson GW, Pfeiffer RM, Yamaji D, and Hennighausen L (2010) Loss of STAT1 from Mouse Mammary Epithelium Results in an Increased Neu-Induced Tumor Burden. Neoplasia 12, 899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.He C, Medley SC, Kim J, Sun C, Kwon HR, Sakashita H, Pincu Y, Yao L, Eppard D, Dai B, Berry WL, Griffin TM, and Olson LE (2017) STAT1 modulates tissue wasting or overgrowth downstream from PDGFRβ. Genes Dev. 31, 1666–1678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gong J, Xu J, Zhang J, Shen Y, Sun H, and Chen B (2026) Molecular mechanisms of skeletal muscle fibrosis and potential targeted therapeutic strategies. Front. Immunol. 17, 1714238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Miller BF, Wolff CA, Peelor FF, Shipman PD, and Hamilton KL (2015) Modeling the contribution of individual proteins to mixed skeletal muscle protein synthetic rates over increasing periods of label incorporation. J. Appl. Physiol. 118, 655–661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fuqua JD, Lawrence MM, Hettinger ZR, Borowik AK, Brecheen PL, Szczygiel MM, Abbott CB, Peelor FF, Confides AL, Kinter M, Bodine SC, Dupont-Versteegden EE, and Miller BF (2023) Impaired proteostatic mechanisms other than decreased protein synthesis limit old skeletal muscle recovery after disuse atrophy. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Castro B and Kuang S (2017) Evaluation of Muscle Performance in Mice by Treadmill Exhaustion Test and Whole-limb Grip Strength Assay. Bio. Protoc. 7, e2237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fuqua JD, Mere CP, Kronemberger A, Blomme J, Bae D, Turner KD, Harris MP, Scudese E, Edwards M, Ebert SM, Sousa LGO, Bodine SC, Yang L, Adams CM, and Lira VA (2019) ULK2 is essential for degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates and homeostasis in skeletal muscle. The FASEB Journal 33, 11735–12745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Borowik AK, Lawrence MM, Peelor FF, Piekarz KM, Crosswhite A, Richardson A, Miller BF, Van Remmen H, and Brown JL (2024) Senolytic treatment does not mitigate oxidative stress-induced muscle atrophy but improves muscle force generation in CuZn superoxide dismutase knockout mice. Geroscience 46, 3219–3233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu H, Czyżowska A, Van Remmen H, and Brown JL (2023) Modulation of sarcopenia phenotypes by glutathione peroxidase 4 overexpression in mice. J. Physiol. 601, 5277–5293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hakim CH, Grange RW, and Duan D (2011) The passive mechanical properties of the extensor digitorum longus muscle are compromised in 2- to 20-mo-old mdx mice. J. Appl. Physiol. 110, 1656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Miller BF, Baehr LM, Musci RV, Reid JJ, Peelor FF, Hamilton KL, and Bodine SC (2019) Muscle-specific changes in protein synthesis with aging and reloading after disuse atrophy. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 10, 1195–1209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Miller BF, Reid JJ, Price JC, Lin H-JL, Atherton PJ, and Smith K (2020) CORP: The use of deuterated water for the measurement of protein synthesis. J. Appl. Physiol. 128, 1163–1176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lawrence MM, Van Pelt DW, Confides AL, Hettinger ZR, Hunt ER, Reid JJ, Laurin JL, Peelor FF, Butterfield TA, Miller BF, and Dupont-Versteegden EE (2021) Muscle from aged rats is resistant to mechanotherapy during atrophy and reloading. Geroscience 43, 65–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wen Y, Murach KA, Vechetti IJ, Fry CS, Vickery C, Peterson CA, McCarthy JJ, and Campbell KS (2018) MyoVision: software for automated high-content analysis of skeletal muscle immunohistochemistry. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985). 124, 40–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hoffman DB, Raymond-Pope CJ, Sorensen JR, Corona BT, and Greising SM (2021) Temporal changes in the muscle extracellular matrix due to volumetric muscle loss injury. Connect. Tissue Res. 63, 124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Abderrahmani A, Yengo L, Caiazzo R, Canouil M, Cauchi S, Raverdy V, Plaisance V, Pawlowski V, Lobbens S, Maillet J, Rolland L, Boutry R, Queniat G, Kwapich M, Tenenbaum M, Bricambert J, Saussenthaler S, Anthony E, Jha P, Derop J, Sand O, Rabearivelo I, Leloire A, Pigeyre M, Daujat-Chavanieu M, Gerbal-Chaloin S, Dayeh T, Lassailly G, Mathurin P, Staels B, Auwerx J, Schürmann A, Postic C, Schafmayer C, Hampe J, Bonnefond A, Pattou F, and Froguel P (2018) Increased Hepatic PDGF-AA Signaling Mediates Liver Insulin Resistance in Obesity-Associated Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 67, 1310–1321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang Z, Warner KA, Mantesso A, and Nör JE (2022) PDGF-BB signaling via PDGFR-β regulates the maturation of blood vessels generated upon vasculogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 977725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Muhl L, Genové G, Leptidis S, Liu J, He L, Mocci G, Sun Y, Gustafsson S, Buyandelger B, Chivukula IV, Segerstolpe Å, Raschperger E, Hansson EM, Björkegren JLM, Peng XR, Vanlandewijck M, Lendahl U, and Betsholtz C (2020) Single-cell analysis uncovers fibroblast heterogeneity and criteria for fibroblast and mural cell identification and discrimination. Nat. Commun. 11, 3953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Uezumi A, Ito T, Morikawa D, Shimizu N, Yoneda T, Segawa M, Yamaguchi M, Ogawa R, Matev MM, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Takeda S, Tsujikawa K, Tsuchida K, Yamamoto H, and Fukada S (2011) Fibrosis and adipogenesis originate from a common mesenchymal progenitor in skeletal muscle. J. Cell Sci. 124, 3654–3664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ieronimakis N, Hays A, Prasad A, Janebodin K, Duffield JS, and Reyes M (2016) PDGFRα signalling promotes fibrogenic responses in collagen-producing cells in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J. Pathol. 240, 410–424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kobak KA, Lawrence MM, Pharaoh G, Borowik AK, Peelor FF, Shipman PD, Griffin TM, Van Remmen H, and Miller BF (2021) Determining the contributions of protein synthesis and breakdown to muscle atrophy requires non-steady-state equations. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 12, 1764–1775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.van den Bos T, Speijer D, Bank RA, Brömme D, and Everts V (2008) Differences in matrix composition between calvaria and long bone in mice suggest differences in biomechanical properties and resorption: Special emphasis on collagen. Bone 43, 459–468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.van der Slot-Verhoeven AJ, van Dura EA, Attema J, Blauw B, Degroot J, Huizinga TWJ, Zuurmond A-M, and Bank RA (2005) The type of collagen cross-link determines the reversibility of experimental skin fibrosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1740, 60–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Welle S, Burgess K, Thornton CA, and Tawil R (2009) Relation between extent of myostatin depletion and muscle growth in mature mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 297, E935–40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mao JH, Langley SA, Huang Y, Hang M, Bouchard KE, Celniker SE, Brown JB, Jansson JK, Karpen GH, and Snijders AM (2015) Identification of genetic factors that modify motor performance and body weight using Collaborative Cross mice. Scientific Reports 2015 5:1 5, 1–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lu A, Tseng C, Guo P, Gao Z, Whitney KE, Kolonin MG, and Huard J (2022) The role of the aging microenvironment on the fate of PDGFRβ lineage cells in skeletal muscle repair. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 13, 405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Garate-Carrillo A, Gonzalez J, Ceballos G, Ramirez-Sanchez I, and Villarreal F (2020) Sex related differences in the pathogenesis of organ fibrosis. Transl. Res. 222, 41–55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kappert K, Caglayan E, Huntgeburth M, Bäumer AT, Sparwel J, Uebel M, and Rosenkranz S (2006) 17β-Estradiol attenuates PDGF signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells at the postreceptor level. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 290, H538–H546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ambhore NS, Katragadda R, Raju Kalidhindi RS, Thompson MA, Pabelick CM, Prakash YS, and Sathish V (2018) Estrogen receptor beta signaling inhibits PDGF induced human airway smooth muscle proliferation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 476, 37–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Stanford KI and Goodyear LJ (2018) Muscle-Adipose Tissue Cross Talk. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 8, a029801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request

RESOURCES