Skip to main content
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2026 May 19;15(10):1543. doi: 10.3390/plants15101543

Genome-Wide Identification of the JAZ Gene Family in Garlic (Allium sativum L.) and the Functional Role of AsJAZ17 in Salt Tolerance

Zhenyu Cao 1,*,†, Na Li 1,†
Editors: Li’na Yin1, Daoqian Chen1
PMCID: PMC13210613  PMID: 42197678

Abstract

Jasmonate ZIM-domain (JAZ) proteins are pivotal repressors in the jasmonate (JA) signaling pathway, yet their specific roles in garlic (Allium sativum) remain largely unexplored. In this study, 28 AsJAZ genes were identified through a genome-wide analysis. The expansion of this family was primarily driven by whole-genome duplication events, with a significant majority (71.43%) of members belonging to a lineage-specific clade, Subfamily E. While AsJAZ proteins harbor conserved TIFY and Jas domains, they exhibit diverse gene structures and subcellular localization patterns. Notably, AsJAZ17 is strictly localized to the nucleus, whereas AsJAZ16 shows a nucleocytoplasmic distribution, suggesting potential functional compartmentalization within the family. Transcriptomic and qRT–PCR analyses revealed that most AsJAZ genes are responsive to heat, salt, and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) modeling and yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assays confirmed that AsJAZ17 physically interacts with the MYC2 transcription factor, identifying it as a key regulator within the conserved COI1-JAZ-MYC2 signaling module. Functional validation demonstrated that overexpression of AsJAZ17 in Arabidopsis significantly enhances salt tolerance. This improvement is attributed to an optimized growth-defense trade-off and a reinforced antioxidant defense system, as evidenced by the increased activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT), which collectively maintain reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis under stress. These findings provide comprehensive insights into the evolutionary and functional landscape of the garlic JAZ family and identify AsJAZ17 as a promising candidate gene for molecular breeding to improve abiotic stress resilience in Allium crops.

Keywords: Allium sativum, JAZ gene family, salt tolerance, jasmonate signaling

1. Introduction

Jasmonic acid (JA) and its bioactive derivative, jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JA-Ile) [1] are essential lipid-derived phytohormones that orchestrate the delicate balance between plant growth, development, and environmental adaptation. In the absence of stress, JA signaling is maintained in a repressed state by Jasmonate ZIM-domain (JAZ) proteins, which act as transcriptional repressors by sequestering key transcription factors (TFs), such as MYC2, and recruiting co-repressors like NINJA [2]. Upon perception of external stimuli, the rapid accumulation of intracellular JA-Ile levels facilitates the interaction between JAZ proteins and the SCF-COI1 ubiquitin ligase complex, where JA-Ile acts as a “molecular glue”. This interaction triggers the degradation of JAZ proteins via the 26S proteasome pathway, thereby releasing the sequestered TFs to activate large-scale adaptive physiological programs [3,4]. Although this signaling cascade can be further fine-tuned by diverse post-translational modifications, the functional versatility of the JA response is primarily driven by the structural conservation and evolutionary diversification of the JAZ family itself [5].

Functioning as the central repressive hubs of the JA pathway, prototypical JAZ proteins are characterized by two highly conserved domains: the N-terminal ZIM domain, which mediates protein dimerization and co-repressor recruitment, and the C-terminal Jas domain, essential for JA-Ile-dependent JAZ-COI1 interaction and degradation [6]. From an evolutionary perspective, the JAZ gene family has undergone significant expansion in higher plants, particularly in angiosperms, primarily driven by whole-genome duplication (WGD) and tandem duplication events [7]. While the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana possesses 12 JAZ members, the family size is markedly larger in polyploid crops, which facilitates functional divergence, or neofunctionalization, enabling plants to adapt to increasingly complex ecological niches. Recent advances have further highlighted that JAZ proteins function as signaling hubs, integrating JA signaling with other hormonal pathways to mediate responses to abiotic stresses. For instance, JAZ members have been identified as key regulators of drought and cold tolerance in Arabidopsis and tomato by modulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging and repressing stress-responsive activators [8,9]. Furthermore, JAZ proteins integrate epigenetic regulation and nutrient sensing, as evidenced by the OsJAZ8-HDA19 module in rice salt tolerance and the PHR1-JAZ-MYC2 module in phosphate starvation responses [10,11].

Despite the critical roles identified for JAZ proteins in model species and major cereal crops, their regulatory potential remains largely uncharacterized in many globally significant vegetable crops, such as garlic (Allium sativum L.). Garlic is widely recognized for its abundance of bioactive constituents, including allicin, polyphenolic compounds, and fructans, which collectively contribute to its pronounced antioxidant, antimicrobial, and health-enhancing properties. The garlic genome is notably large, with an estimated size of approximately 16 Gb and comprising about 91.3% repetitive sequences. Phylogenomic evidence indicates that the garlic genome has undergone three distinct WGD events: the first two occurring prior to the divergence from Asparagus officinalis approximately 80.8 million years ago (Mya), and a third event inferred to have occurred around 17.9 Mya [12], followed by a recent transposable element burst approximately 0.2–0.3 Mya [13]. These profound genomic events not only contributed to the massive expansion of the garlic genome but also provided the genetic basis for the duplication, diversification, and neofunctionalization of many gene families, including the JAZs.

In the present study, we performed a comprehensive genome-wide identification of the JAZ gene family in A. sativum to elucidate its evolutionary trajectory and potential roles in stress adaptation. We characterized the chromosomal distribution, gene structures, and conserved motifs of the identified AsJAZ members, and further investigated their phylogenetic relationships with JAZs from other representative species. To gain insights into their functional roles, we analyzed the expression profiles of AsJAZ genes under various abiotic stresses and during different developmental stages. This study provides a foundation for understanding the JA-mediated regulatory networks in garlic and offers potential genetic targets for enhancing the resilience of this important crop.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of JAZ Family Members

To identify the JAZ gene family in garlic, the JAZ protein sequences from A. thaliana were used to construct a hidden Markov model (HMM). A total of 28 JAZ genes were identified in the garlic genome and designated as AsJAZ1 to AsJAZ28 according to their chromosomal positions (Table 1). The predicted AsJAZ proteins range from 107 (AsJAZ27) to 349 (AsJAZ19) amino acids (aa), with calculated isoelectric points (pI) of 4.94 (AsJAZ20)–10.41 (AsJAZ27) and molecular weights of 12.39 (AsJAZ27)–39.80 (AsJAZ19) kDa. The instability indices vary between 38.32 (AsJAZ26) and 69.77 (AsJAZ18), while the aliphatic indices range from 59.62 (AsJAZ18) to 89.61 (AsJAZ1). The grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) values are between −0.984 (AsJAZ20) and −0.155 (AsJAZ1), indicating hydrophilic properties. Subcellular localization predictions suggest that eight AsJAZ proteins are localized in the cytoplasm and 20 in the nucleus.

Table 1.

The characteristics of the AsJAZ family.

No. Name Sequence ID Number of Amino Acid Molecular Weight Theoretical pI Instability Index Aliphatic Index Grand Average of
Hydropathicity
Subcellular
Localization
1 AsJAZ1 Asa0G00889.1 207 22,316.56 9.5 52.66 89.61 −0.155 Cytoplasm
2 AsJAZ2 Asa0G01028.1 170 18,171.63 7.77 47.06 73.41 −0.321 Nucleus
3 AsJAZ3 Asa0G01029.1 110 12,400.18 8.96 64.27 78.09 −0.44 Nucleus
4 AsJAZ4 Asa0G02987.1 136 15,408.72 9.45 52.07 86.18 −0.271 Nucleus
5 AsJAZ5 Asa0G05575.1 168 19,031.67 8.85 53.25 77.8 −0.524 Nucleus
6 AsJAZ6 Asa0G05603.1 149 16,788.39 9.49 59 78.59 −0.483 Nucleus
7 AsJAZ7 Asa1G00005.1 152 17,308.96 9.37 46.67 82.11 −0.45 Nucleus
8 AsJAZ8 Asa1G00028.1 149 16,936.64 9.44 58.79 77.92 −0.441 Nucleus
9 AsJAZ9 Asa1G00030.1 153 17,168.61 9.76 51.07 76.67 −0.568 Nucleus
10 AsJAZ10 Asa1G00038.1 147 16,348.55 9.38 68.11 82.38 −0.564 Nucleus
11 AsJAZ11 Asa1G00039.1 165 18,475.86 7.7 52.85 79.88 −0.552 Nucleus
12 AsJAZ12 Asa1G00040.1 158 17,504.78 9.12 59.1 81.58 −0.47 Cytoplasm
13 AsJAZ13 Asa1G00041.1 157 17,720.52 9.66 48.35 82.04 −0.441 Nucleus
14 AsJAZ14 Asa1G00043.1 163 18,230.58 8.5 51.61 76.63 −0.547 Cytoplasm
15 AsJAZ15 Asa1G00044.1 163 18,210.59 8.5 53.31 77.24 −0.536 Cytoplasm
16 AsJAZ16 Asa1G01572.1 174 18,939.62 8.71 53.04 83.1 −0.364 Cytoplasm
17 AsJAZ17 Asa2G00577.1 211 22,852.19 9.4 36.56 75.97 −0.434 Nucleus
18 AsJAZ18 Asa3G00235.1 131 15,283.6 9.78 69.77 59.62 −0.944 Nucleus
19 AsJAZ19 Asa3G00571.1 349 39,802.68 8.78 44.66 87.45 −0.349 Nucleus
20 AsJAZ20 Asa3G00573.1 287 33,162.1 4.94 47.2 71.01 −0.984 Cytoplasm
21 AsJAZ21 Asa3G00575.1 171 19,314.05 8.5 51.21 82.16 −0.437 Nucleus
22 AsJAZ22 Asa3G04941.1 217 25,261.11 9.82 62.33 66.08 −0.722 Nucleus
23 AsJAZ23 Asa3G05094.1 170 19,239.87 8.5 53.81 74.06 −0.546 Nucleus
24 AsJAZ24 Asa4G00559.1 224 24,690.07 9.17 58.3 74.82 −0.535 Nucleus
25 AsJAZ25 Asa4G01523.1 156 17,173.55 9.62 41.9 86.99 −0.216 Cytoplasm
26 AsJAZ26 Asa4G01696.1 180 19,532.2 9.71 38.32 69.94 −0.547 Cytoplasm
27 AsJAZ27 Asa5G03418.1 107 12,394.54 10.41 39.76 89.35 −0.328 Nucleus
28 AsJAZ28 Asa7G05781.1 172 19,288.17 9.57 40.19 78.31 −0.509 Nucleus

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the amino acid sequences of 12 A. thaliana and 28 garlic JAZ proteins (Figure 1). According to phylogenetic clustering with Arabidopsis thaliana counterparts, the 28 AsJAZ proteins were assigned to 5 distinct subfamilies: Group A–E (containing 1, 2, 3, 2, and 20 members, respectively). All identified AsJAZ proteins clustered into these established subfamilies, with none designated as unclassified. Among the defined subfamilies, all five—A, B, C, D, and E—harbor garlic JAZ members. Notably, 20 (71.43%) of the AsJAZ proteins belong to subfamily E, a clade dominated by garlic JAZs lacking Arabidopsis orthologs, indicating that this specific group has likely undergone significant lineage-specific expansion and may represent the primary functional clade for the JAZ family in garlic.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of the JAZ gene family in A. sativum. An unrooted neighbor-joining tree was constructed in MEGA 11.0 using the full-length amino acid sequences of the AsJAZ and AtJAZ proteins, the Poisson substitution model, and pairwise deletion of gaps. Bootstrap values from 1000 replicates (shown at nodes) ≥ 50% are indicated. Based on sequence homology, the JAZ proteins cluster into 5 distinct subfamilies (A–E), each marked by a distinct colored arc and shaded background.

2.3. Conserved Motif and Gene Structure Analysis

To explore the structural diversity and conservation of AsJAZ proteins, the phylogenetic relationships among the family members were first examined (Figure 2A). Based on this phylogenetic framework, eight conserved motifs were identified and designated as Motif 1–8 (Table S1). The results showed that most AsJAZ members within the same phylogenetic clade (Figure 2A) shared similar motif compositions (Figure 2B). For instance, Motifs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were highly conserved across the majority of the family members, suggesting their essential roles in the fundamental functions of JAZ proteins. However, certain members exhibited distinct motif patterns; for example, AsJAZ19 and AsJAZ20 possessed unique motif arrangements compared to other clades, reflecting potential functional divergence during evolution.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Phylogenetic relationship, conserved protein motifs, gene structure, and domain compositions of AsJAZ genes. (A): The neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree of AsJAZ proteins. (B): Distribution of conserved motifs in AsJAZ proteins identified by MEME analysis. The eight identified motifs are represented by different colored boxes (Motif 1–8), and their relative positions are indicated. The scale bar at the bottom represents the length of the protein (aa). (C): Exon–intron organization of AsJAZ genes. Green boxes represent coding sequences (CDS) and black lines represent introns. The scale bar at the bottom indicates the gene length (bp). (D): Conserved domain architecture of AsJAZ proteins. The TIFY domain, Jas_motif, and GluZincin superfamily are indicated by yellow, light green, and dark teal boxes, respectively. The scale bar at the bottom indicates the protein length (aa).

The exon–intron organization of AsJAZ genes was analyzed to further understand their evolutionary history (Figure 2C). The number of exons varied among family members, typically ranging from 1 to 6. Most AsJAZ genes displayed a relatively simple structure with a limited number of introns. Notably, the total genomic length of these genes showed significant variation; while most members occupied a range within 4000 bp, certain genes such as AsJAZ16 and AsJAZ25 contained substantially longer intronic regions, exceeding 10,000 bp. Despite these variations in length, the gene structures remained largely consistent within specific subfamilies.

Domain analysis further confirmed the identity of the AsJAZ proteins (Figure 2D). Almost all identified AsJAZ proteins contained the characteristic TIFY domain (yellow) and the Jas motif (green), which are the defining features of the JAZ (TIFY) family. In most cases, the TIFY domain was located towards the N-terminus relative to the Jas motif, which was consistently positioned near the C-terminus. Interestingly, AsJAZ22 was found to harbor an additional GluZincin superfamily domain at its N-terminus, a feature absent in other members. This unique domain architecture suggests that AsJAZ22 may have specialized regulatory roles distinct from the core JAZ signaling pathway.

2.4. Chromosomal Localization

Chromosomal localization analysis revealed that 22 AsJAZ genes are distributed across six garlic chromosomes (chr1–chr5, and chr7), while the remaining 6 genes are located on 5 unanchored scaffolds (Figure 3). The number of mapped AsJAZ genes per chromosome ranges from 1 to 10. Chromosome 1 harbors the largest cluster, with 10 genes (accounting for approximately 45.45% of the chromosome-mapped members), whereas chromosomes 2, 5, and 7 contain the fewest, with only one gene each (AsJAZ17, AsJAZ27, and AsJAZ28, respectively). Many AsJAZ genes are situated in the distal or subtelomeric regions of the chromosomes. The pronounced, dense clustering of AsJAZ genes on chromosome 1 (specifically AsJAZ7 to AsJAZ16) and chromosome 3 did not originate from proximal or tandem duplication events according to our collinearity analysis. Instead, this distribution pattern might be the result of ancient WGD events followed by extensive chromosomal rearrangements, which contributed to the current architecture of the JAZ family in garlic.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Genomic localization of the AsJAZ gene family in A. sativum. The physical coordinates of the AsJAZ genes are depicted on unanchored scaffolds (positioned on the left) and the six corresponding assembled garlic chromosomes (chr1–chr5, and chr7; positioned on the right). Specific scaffold identifiers are indicated next to their respective sequences, while each individual AsJAZ gene is marked according to its approximate genomic mapping. The reference scale bar on the left displays the physical distance in megabases (Mb).

2.5. Interspecific Collinearity Analysis

To investigate the evolutionary relationship and genomic conservation of JAZ genes, a comparative synteny analysis was performed among three Allium species: A. sativum (As), Allium. fistulosum (Af), and Allium. cepa (Ac). The circular map illustrates extensive syntenic blocks across the three genomes, reflecting a high degree of evolutionary conservation within the Allium genus (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Collinearity analysis of JAZ genes among A. sativum, A. fistulosum, and A. cepa. The chromosomes/contigs of A. fistulosum (Af), A. sativum (As), and A. cepa (Ac) are represented by green, yellow, and blue segments, respectively. Gray ribbons in the background indicate the overall syntenic blocks between the genomes. The highlighted colored lines (green and red) represent the orthologous relationships between specific JAZ gene pairs across the three species. Gene IDs for orthologous pairs in Af and Ac are labeled alongside their respective chromosomal locations.

Several orthologous JAZ gene pairs were identified across the species. Notably, AsJAZ8 and AsJAZ9, located on chromosome As-1, exhibited strong syntenic relationships with the AfisC8G05913 and AfisC8G05923 loci on Af-8. Similarly, AsJAZ17 on As-2 was orthologous to AfisC7G06136 on Af-7, while AsJAZ18 on As-3 showed a syntenic link to AfisC3G00614 on Af-3.

Furthermore, AsJAZ28 on chromosome As-7 demonstrated a conserved syntenic relationship spanning all three species, connecting to AfisC1G02939 on Af-1 (green line) and the g365518.t1 locus on Ac-1 (red line). These results indicate that several JAZ family members have been highly conserved during the divergence of garlic, Welsh onion, and onion, suggesting that these orthologous pairs may have originated from a common ancestor and potentially maintained similar biological functions.

2.6. Analysis of Cis-Acting Elements in Promoter Regions

The 2 kb upstream promoter sequences of the AsJAZ genes were investigated to identify predicted cis-acting regulatory elements (Figure 5). These identified motifs were subsequently classified into three primary functional categories: hormone response, light response, and stress response. While each promoter exhibit diverse combinations of these regulatory motifs, their frequencies differ significantly among the family members, indicating divergent transcriptional regulatory profiles.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Distribution of cis-acting regulatory elements in the promoters of AsJAZ genes. The heatmap illustrates the quantity of predicted regulatory motifs identified within the 2-kb upstream promoter regions of the 28 AsJAZ genes. The cis-elements are grouped into three distinct functional categories: hormone response (shaded purple), light response (shaded orange), and stress response (shaded blue). The numbers within each cell, along with the corresponding background color intensity, denote the absolute count of a specific element in each gene’s promoter. A phylogenetic tree is displayed on the left to show the evolutionary clustering of the AsJAZ family members.

Abscisic acid-responsive elements (ABRE) and methyl jasmonate-associated motifs (CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif) are widespread across the family. Promoters of specific genes, such as AsJAZ28, AsJAZ17, and AsJAZ9, display remarkably high concentrations of ABRE or MeJA-related sites, suggesting robust sensitivity to ABA and jasmonic acid signaling pathways. Core light-responsive elements, predominantly G-box and Box 4 motifs, are also extensively distributed. Notably, the promoters of AsJAZ9, AsJAZ17, and AsJAZ2 harbor particularly high numbers of G-box sites, implying substantial regulation by light stimuli.

Among the stress-responsive elements—which encompass low-temperature responsiveness (LTR), drought inducibility (MBS), and defense-related components—MYB and MYC transcription factor binding sites are overwhelmingly predominant. Furthermore, several elements explicitly associated with biotic stress and mechanical wounding were identified within this category, including the wound-responsive WUN-motif, the pathogen defense-related W-box, and TC-rich repeats. Specifically, AsJAZ9, AsJAZ27, and AsJAZ13 feature exceptional abundance in MYB or MYC binding domains, underscoring their likely fundamental roles in adaptations to varied environmental stresses, while the coexistence of biotic stress-related motifs indicates that these genes also maintain their canonical roles in JA-dependent defense responses against biological threats. The accompanying hierarchical clustering aligns the genes based on shared phylogenetic and regulatory motif profiles; genes like AsJAZ7 and AsJAZ27 share a comprehensive, multi-responsive repertoire, whereas others, such as AsJAZ22, present relatively simpler element arrays, potentially indicating a more specialized regulatory scope.

2.7. Expression Pattern Analysis

Transcriptome analysis across six tissues revealed differential expression patterns among the 28 AsJAZ genes (Figure 6). Overall, the highest transcript accumulation is predominantly observed in flowers, leaves, and roots, suggesting that these organs serve as primary functional domains for JAZ-mediated signaling and development in garlic.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Tissue-specific expression profiles of the AsJAZ gene family in A. sativum. The circular heatmap illustrates the relative transcript abundance of the 28 AsJAZ genes across six distinct garlic tissues: roots, bulbs, sprouts, pseudostems, leaves, and flowers. The color gradient represents normalized expression levels, with green indicating lower transcript abundance and orange indicating higher transcript abundance. The corresponding scale bar is provided on the top right.

At the individual gene level, distinct tissue-preferential signatures can be observed. In reproductive tissues, AsJAZ1, AsJAZ17, and AsJAZ26 exhibit prominent up-regulation within floral organs. Meanwhile, in aerial vegetative tissues, transcript accumulation peaks in the leaves for AsJAZ13, AsJAZ16, and AsJAZ17, whereas AsJAZ3, AsJAZ9, and AsJAZ24 display their highest expression levels within the pseudostems.

Evaluation of spatial distribution further highlights specific associations within below-ground and storage organs. A distinct group of genes—including AsJAZ4, AsJAZ14, and AsJAZ15—shows preferential high expression predominantly restricted to the roots. Within the bulbs, AsJAZ25 exhibits notably high transcript abundance. Additionally, in the sprouts, AsJAZ18, AsJAZ22, and AsJAZ25 demonstrate peak expression levels. Conversely, a specific subset of genes—comprising AsJAZ6, AsJAZ8, AsJAZ27, and AsJAZ28—exhibits zero or negligible expression across all the analyzed tissues under standard growth conditions. This basal suppression implies that these members may be subjected to strict transcriptional control, potentially serving as specialized regulatory components that are exclusively inducible upon environmental stresses or specific hormone elicitation.

2.8. qRT–PCR Analysis

To validate the stress-responsive expression patterns of AsJAZ genes observed in transcriptomic analysis and clustering, we selected twelve representative members (AsJAZ17, -16, -26, -9, -23, -20, -21, -5, -2, -19, -24, and -3) for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT–PCR) (Figure 7). These genes were chosen based on their expression profiles and their potential differential responsiveness under various treatments. These treatments were selected to represent the major abiotic environmental challenges in garlic production (heat and salt) and to evaluate the core response of AsJAZ genes to the jasmonate signaling pathway (MeJA). Leaves are typically the primary sites of physiological and phenotypic changes during environmental stress, making them an ideal tissue for identifying stress-related gene activity. Garlic plants were subjected to heat (represented by T), salt (S), and methyl jasmonate (M) treatments, and leaf samples were collected at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h for analysis.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

qRT–PCR analysis of selected AsJAZ genes in garlic under various stress treatments. Seedlings were subjected to (A) heat stress (39 °C), (B) salt stress (200 mM NaCl), or (C) methyl jasmonate treatment (100 µM MeJA) for 6, 12, and 24 h. “CK” denotes the untreated control plants. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three biological replicates (n = 3), with each biological replicate comprising three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences relative to the CK group at each time point, determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).

Under heat stress (Figure 7A), AsJAZ17 and AsJAZ26 were significantly induced, with transcript levels increasing and peaking at 24 h. AsJAZ21 and AsJAZ5 showed an early response, with expression peaking at 6 h before declining. Conversely, AsJAZ2, AsJAZ23, and AsJAZ24 displayed progressive downregulation over the treatment period, indicating that these genes may be repressed by high temperatures or function predominantly under non-stress conditions. Under salt treatment (Figure 7B), AsJAZ17, AsJAZ9, and AsJAZ19 showed strong induction at 24 h, with AsJAZ17 reaching a particularly notable expression level. AsJAZ16 and AsJAZ26 exhibited early induction at 6 h. In contrast, AsJAZ2, AsJAZ24, and AsJAZ20 exhibited persistent downregulation throughout the salt exposure, implying either a functional suppression by salinity or involvement in different regulatory pathways. Following MeJA application (Figure 7C), AsJAZ17, AsJAZ26, AsJAZ9, and AsJAZ19 were upregulated at later time points (12 h or 24 h). AsJAZ3 displayed a distinct and specific induction at 12 h. Notably, AsJAZ2 and AsJAZ24 again showed sustained downregulation under MeJA treatment, exhibiting persistent repression across all three stresses, consistent with potential roles as negative regulators or stress-suppressed factors.

Together, these qRT–PCR results confirm that most selected AsJAZ genes are robustly responsive to heat, salt, and MeJA, with AsJAZ17 and AsJAZ26 emerging as versatile multi-stress responsive markers. Meanwhile, the downregulated subset may participate in energy reallocation or negative feedback during stress responses.

2.9. Protein–Protein Interaction Network and Gene Ontology Enrichment

Gene Ontology analysis (Figure 8A) revealed that the AsJAZ genes are significantly enriched in biological processes (BP) associated with the “response to jasmonic acid,” the “jasmonic acid mediated signaling pathway,” and the “negative regulation of RNA biosynthetic process.” Within the cellular component (CC) category, these genes are predominantly mapped to the “nucleus” and “intracellular membrane-bounded organelle,” consistent with their anticipated roles as nuclear-localized components. For molecular function (MF), the most highly enriched terms include “transcription corepressor activity” and “transcription regulator activity.” Together, these functional annotations align closely with the established roles of JAZ proteins as transcriptional repressors in plant hormone signaling.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

GO enrichment and interaction network of AsJAZ proteins. (A) GO enrichment analysis. Terms are categorized into Molecular Function (squares), Cellular Component (triangles), and Biological Process (circles). Node size represents gene count; color reflects significance (–log10(p-value)). (B) Predicted PPI network. Peripheral pink nodes represent AsJAZ proteins. Central light blue nodes are key interacting hub proteins. Grey lines denote predicted interactions.

To further map the functional relationships of these proteins, a predictive PPI network was constructed (Figure 8B). The network displays a distinct topology wherein the majority of the peripheral AsJAZ proteins (colored pink) interact directly with three central hub proteins (colored blue). Based on annotation, the hub gene Asa2G03533.1 encodes a coronatine-insensitive protein 1 (COI1) homolog, which functions as a primary jasmonate receptor. The other two central nodes, Asa7G00377.1 and Asa7G03408.1, are identified as MYC2 transcription factors. The extensive, high-confidence interactions between the diverse AsJAZ family members and these specific hub proteins indicate that garlic possesses a conserved core JA signaling module (COI1-JAZ-MYC2), suggesting that AsJAZ proteins function by physically complexing with COI1 and MYC2 to mediate downstream transcriptional responses.

2.10. Subcellular Localization and Protein–Protein Interaction Analysis of AsJAZs

To validate the bioinformatic predictions and investigate the cellular compartments where AsJAZ proteins exert their biological functions, AsJAZ16 and AsJAZ17 were selected as representative candidates due to their distinct predicted localization patterns and their robust transcriptional induction under salt stress (Figure 7B). We performed transient expression assays in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf epidermal cells (Figure 9A). GFP-fused constructs of AsJAZ16 and AsJAZ17 were co-expressed with the nuclear marker NLS-mCherry to determine their subcellular distribution. Confocal imaging of the empty-vector control (pCAMBIA1302) showed that the free GFP signal was ubiquitously distributed throughout the cell, including the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Under the same experimental conditions, the AsJAZ17-GFP fluorescence was concentrated exclusively within the nucleus and overlapped precisely with the NLS-mCherry signal, indicating a strict nuclear localization. In contrast, AsJAZ16-GFP exhibited a broader distribution pattern; the green fluorescence signal was observed both within the nucleus, where it colocalized with NLS-mCherry, and in the cytoplasm along the cell periphery and transvacuolar strands. These observations demonstrate that AsJAZ16 and AsJAZ17 possess distinct subcellular localization patterns, with AsJAZ17 being a nuclear protein and AsJAZ16 being localized to both the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Such differential partitioning suggests that these two JAZ proteins may fulfill different regulatory roles within their respective cellular environments.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Subcellular localization and protein–protein interaction analyses of AsJAZ proteins. (A) Subcellular localization of AsJAZ16 and AsJAZ17. Transient co-expression of the GFP fusion proteins (AsJAZ16-GFP and AsJAZ17-GFP) and the empty vector (pCAMBIA1302-GFP) with the nuclear marker NLS-mCherry in N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cells. The panels from left to right represent GFP fluorescence (green), mCherry fluorescence (red), bright-field images (Blank), and merged images. The free GFP signal from the empty pCAMBIA1302 vector is distributed in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. The AsJAZ17-GFP signal strictly colocalizes with the nuclear marker NLS-mCherry, whereas the AsJAZ16-GFP signal is detected in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Scale bars = 20 μm. (B) Y2H assay confirming the interaction between AsJAZ17 and the MYC2 transcription factor Asa7G03408.1. Yeast cells co-expressing the indicated constructs were spotted onto non-selective medium (left panels) and selective media supplemented with X-α-Gal (middle and right panels) in a series of 10-fold dilutions (100, 10−1, 10−2). Pos represents the positive control; Neg represents the negative control.

To further validate the functional relationships predicted by our PPI network, we performed a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay to test the interaction between the strictly nuclear-localized AsJAZ17 and the predicted central hub protein Asa7G03408.1, a MYC2 transcription factor. As shown in Figure 9B, yeast cells co-transformed with AsJAZ17 and Asa7G03408.1 grew normally and developed blue colonies on the selective dropout media, exhibiting a phenotype similar to the positive control. In contrast, the negative control strains failed to survive under the same selective conditions. These results provide direct in vivo evidence that AsJAZ17 physically interacts with the MYC2 transcription factor Asa7G03408.1, firmly corroborating the bioinformatic predictions and supporting the existence of a conserved COI1-JAZ-MYC2 signaling module in garlic.

2.11. Overexpression of AsJAZ17 Enhances Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis

To evaluate the biological role of the AsJAZ family in stress adaptation, we prioritized AsJAZ17 as the primary candidate for functional validation. This choice was driven by its exceptionally robust transcriptional induction under salinity—which was significantly more pronounced than that of other members such as AsJAZ16 (Figure 7B)—as well as the high density of salt-responsive elements in its promoter (Figure 5) and its central hub status in the predicted PPI network (Figure 8B). While AsJAZ16 also exhibited salt-responsiveness, its potential functional role will be further explored in our future research to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the family’s diversity. In the present study, we observed the growth phenotypes of wild-type (WT) and three independent AsJAZ17-overexpressing lines (OE#3, OE#4, and OE#7). Under control conditions (CK), no significant morphological differences were observed between the WT and OE lines. However, upon exposure to 100 mM NaCl for 72 h, the WT plants exhibited severe growth inhibition, characterized by evident leaf wilting and chlorosis. In contrast, the AsJAZ17-OE lines displayed a more robust growth phenotype with higher biomass and reduced leaf damage compared to the WT (Figure 10A). The levels of ROS and MDA were measured to assess the degree of oxidative stress and membrane damage. Under control conditions, there were no significant differences in H2O2, superoxide anion (O2−) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents between the WT and OE lines. Salt stress (100 mM NaCl) led to a marked increase in ROS accumulation in all lines; however, the levels of ROS in the OE lines were significantly lower than those in the WT (Figure 10B,C). Similarly, the MDA content, a key indicator of lipid peroxidation, was significantly lower in the transgenic lines than in the WT under salt treatment (Figure 10D). These results suggest that AsJAZ17 overexpression reduces salt-induced oxidative damage in Arabidopsis. To further investigate the mechanism by which AsJAZ17 regulates ROS homeostasis, the activities of major antioxidant enzymes, including Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT), were analyzed. Under normal growth conditions, SOD, POD, and CAT activities remained at basal levels with no significant differences between genotypes. Following salt treatment, the activities of these three enzymes were significantly up-regulated in all plants. Notably, the OE lines exhibited significantly higher SOD, POD, and CAT activities compared to the WT plants (Figure 10E–G). These findings indicate that the enhanced salt tolerance in AsJAZ17-OE lines is associated with an improved antioxidant defense system.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Phenotypic and physiological responses of wild-type (WT) and transgenic lines under salt stress. (A) Growth phenotypes of WT and transgenic lines (OE#3, OE#4, and OE#7) under control (CK) and salt stress (100 mM NaCl) conditions. Images were captured after 72 h of treatment. (B–D) Concentration of ROS and lipid peroxidation markers: (B) H2O2 content, (C) O2− content, and (D) MDA content. (E–G) Activities of antioxidant enzymes: (E) SOD, (F) POD and (G) CAT. All physiological parameters were measured in the leaves of 4-week-old plants. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and OE lines under the same treatment according to Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01; ns, not significant).

3. Discussion

JAZ proteins are core repressors in the JA signaling pathway, playing crucial roles in regulating plant vegetative growth, reproductive development, and responses to various biotic and abiotic stresses. In this study, a total of 28 AsJAZ genes were identified in the garlic genome. Compared to the JAZ family sizes in other well-studied model plants or crops, such as Arabidopsis thaliana (12), maize (Zea mays) (16), and rice (Oryza sativa) (23), garlic possesses a significantly larger repertoire of JAZ members [14,15,16]. Our chromosomal localization analysis revealed an uneven distribution of AsJAZ genes, with pronounced, dense clustering observed on specific chromosomes, particularly chromosome 1 (harboring 10 genes, roughly 45%) and chromosome 3. This highly clustered genomic arrangement on chromosome 1 might not be attributed to recent tandem duplications, as our collinearity analysis detected no such events. Instead, it likely reflects ancient whole-genome duplication events followed by complex chromosomal rearrangements and lineage-specific retentions, contributing to the expansion of the AsJAZ family in garlic. Phylogenetic analysis further elucidated the complex evolutionary trajectory of AsJAZs. The AsJAZ proteins clustered into five distinct subfamilies (A–E). Strikingly, 20 out of 28 AsJAZ members (71.43%) were entirely assigned to Subfamily E, a massive clade exclusively composed of garlic JAZs without any Arabidopsis orthologs. This phenomenon indicates a significant lineage-specific expansion within the garlic JAZ family. Lineage-specific expanded genes are often retained during evolution to facilitate adaptation to specific ecological niches or to govern unique developmental processes [17,18]. Consistent with this, our transcriptomic and qRT-PCR data demonstrate that multiple Subfamily E genes are induced by abiotic stress and MeJA treatment. Tissue-specific expression profiles indicate that certain members, such as AsJAZ14 and AsJAZ15, are preferentially expressed in roots, suggesting a role in localized stress perception. The expansion of Subfamily E introduces functional redundancy into the gene family. This redundancy may function as a regulatory buffer to modulate the intensity of jasmonate signaling, assisting the plant in maintaining the growth-defense trade-off during environmental stress. Despite the rapid expansion and diversification of certain clades, core elements of the JAZ family remain highly conserved. Interspecies collinearity analysis among three Allium species revealed extensive syntenic blocks and several highly conserved orthologous JAZ gene pairs, such as AsJAZ28. This high syntenic conservation typically implies that these orthologs have been subjected to strong purifying selection to maintain fundamental biological functions in the JA signaling pathway across the Allium genus.

The biological function of JAZ proteins is intrinsically linked to their conserved domains and precise subcellular distribution. In this study, domain analysis confirmed that nearly all 28 AsJAZ proteins harbor the characteristic TIFY and Jas motifs. The TIFY domain is essential for repressor complex formation, while the Jas motif mediates interaction with COI1 receptors and MYC transcription factors [19,20]. Notably, AsJAZ22 was found to possess a unique gluzincin superfamily domain at its N-terminus. This distinct domain architecture suggests that AsJAZ22 may have evolved specialized regulatory roles or participated in crosstalk between JA signaling and proteolytic pathways [21,22]. Furthermore, the unusually substantial intronic regions observed in AsJAZ16 and AsJAZ25 (>10,000 bp) point toward complex transcriptional regulation, such as alternative splicing or the presence of internal regulatory elements. Subcellular localization is a critical determinant of protein function. Our experimental results for AsJAZ17 are consistent with the established model of JAZs as nuclear-localized transcriptional repressors, aligning with its predicted role in the COI1-JAZ-MYC2 signaling module identified in the PPI network. However, the distinct localization patterns of AsJAZ16 and AsJAZ17 suggest a refined layer of functional specialization within the garlic JAZ family. While JAZ proteins are traditionally characterized as nuclear-localized components, our findings reveal that AsJAZ16 exhibits a nucleocytoplasmic distribution. This pattern is consistent with observations in other plant species, such as Lycoris aurea, where certain JAZ members have also been identified to localize within the cytoplasm or exhibit nucleocytoplasmic co-localization [23]. Crucially, our subcellular localization predictions indicate that 8 out of the 28 identified AsJAZ members are not exclusively localized to the nucleus. This distribution suggests that the spatial partitioning and potential nucleocytoplasmic shuttling observed for AsJAZ16 represent a broader regulatory mechanism within the garlic JAZ family, rather than an isolated case. The presence of AsJAZ16, and potentially other members, in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus implies a more complex and dynamic regulatory mechanism, possibly involving cytoplasmic sequestration. Sequestering a portion of JAZ proteins in the cytoplasm may provide a cellular reservoir. Such a strategy would allow the plant to fine-tune the intensity and duration of JA responses by modulating the concentration of the repressor available to interact with nuclear transcription factors in response to specific developmental or environmental cues. This spatial divergence underscores the functional compartmentalization within the garlic JAZ family; while AsJAZ17 functions as a direct nuclear repressor, AsJAZ16 may participate in non-genomic JA signaling processes in the cytoplasm or act as a scaffold protein to integrate JA signaling with other cytoplasmic pathways before translocating into the nucleus. This multi-layered regulatory architecture enables the plant to achieve a more nuanced and rapid response to JA-mediated signals. Collectively, these results indicate that the garlic JAZ family has evolved distinct subcellular partitioning strategies, reflecting a sophisticated evolutionary adaptation to ensure a highly coordinated and flexible defense and developmental program through diverse cellular environments. The expression profile of a gene is fundamentally linked to the cis-acting regulatory elements within its promoter region. In this study, transcriptome analysis revealed that a substantial proportion of AsJAZ genes exhibit preferential transcript accumulation in the roots. Given that roots serve as the primary interface for sensing soil-borne abiotic stresses, this suggests their involvement in early stress perception and JA signal relay. The robust induction of AsJAZ17, AsJAZ26, and AsJAZ9 under heat, salt, and MeJA treatments correlates with an abundance of ABRE, MeJA-responsive motifs, and MYB/MYC binding sites in their promoters [24]. Notably, the high frequency of G-box motifs in AsJAZ9 and AsJAZ17 implies potential roles in the crosstalk between light signaling and JA-mediated pathways [25]. The qRT–PCR analysis also demonstrated divergent response patterns, characterized by both significant up-regulation and persistent downregulation. Members such as AsJAZ2 and AsJAZ24 were consistently repressed following stress exposure. Since JAZ proteins are repressors, their downregulation likely facilitates the release of inhibition on downstream defense genes. Conversely, the strong induction of AsJAZ17 might serve as a negative feedback mechanism to prevent over-activation of JA signaling. This synergistic action of induction and repression reflects a sophisticated strategy to maintain signal homeostasis and optimize resource allocation under adverse conditions [26]. The promoter region of AsJAZ17 contains both abscisic acid-responsive elements (ABRE) and MeJA-associated motifs (CGTCA/TGACG-motifs), suggesting its involvement in both signaling pathways. At the molecular level, AsJAZ17 interacts with MYC2, which serves as a convergence point for hormone crosstalk. This interaction coordinates JA-mediated defense responses with ABA-mediated osmotic adjustment. During salt stress, AsJAZ17 may prevent JA signaling from antagonizing ABA protective pathways, thereby supporting antioxidant enzyme activity and cellular homeostasis. This coordination between hormones is a strategy for garlic to maintain physiological balance under environmental stress.

The integration of PPI modeling and functional validation identifies AsJAZ17 as a central regulator of the salt stress response in garlic. The predictive PPI network, complemented by our Y2H assay, demonstrates that AsJAZ17 serves as a key node by interacting directly with the core JA signaling machinery, specifically the MYC2 transcription factor (Asa7G03408.1). This confirmed physical interaction establishes that AsJAZ17 operates through the canonical COI1-JAZ-MYC2 signaling module to translate JA signals into downstream transcriptional changes. Beyond this specific interaction, the functional dynamics of the garlic JA signaling network are also influenced by internal interactions among the 28 AsJAZ members. As indicated by the predictive PPI network (Figure S1), the conserved TIFY domain present in these proteins facilitates the formation of various JAZ-JAZ complexes. This structural capability suggests that different JAZ members compete for interaction with central transcription factors, such as MYC2. This competitive binding, combined with the redundancy provided by the expanded Subfamily E, creates a regulatory buffer. This internal network allows the plant to calibrate its physiological responses and maintain signaling homeostasis as individual JAZ proteins undergo stress-induced degradation. Functional evidence from transgenic Arabidopsis lines further supports this role, as AsJAZ17-overexpressing (OE) lines exhibited significantly improved growth phenotypes, characterized by higher biomass and reduced chlorosis compared to wild-type (WT) plants under 100 mM NaCl treatment. The observation that overexpressing a transcriptional repressor enhances stress tolerance can be elucidated through the “Growth-Defense Trade-off” mechanism. While the JA signaling pathway is essential for defense, its persistent activation typically leads to severe growth inhibition as the plant reallocates metabolic resources away from primary growth. Specifically, unchecked activity of MYC2—the master activator of JA defense—can negatively regulate growth by inhibiting primary root development and suppressing genes involved in primary metabolism [27,28]. By physically complexing with MYC2, AsJAZ17 restricts the ability of this transcription factor to promote physiological arrest, thereby preventing the runaway activation of the JA response. This calibration allows the plant to preserve the necessary physiological vigor and metabolic energy required for survival during prolonged salinity. Furthermore, the enhancement of salt tolerance is tightly linked to precise hormonal crosstalk and ROS homeostasis. MYC2 often functions as a central node for antagonistic cross-talk between JA signaling and other stress hormones, such as abscisic acid (ABA). High levels of MYC2 can misdirect the cellular response toward JA-mediated pathways at the expense of ABA-dependent pathways, which are essential for osmotic adjustment and drought/salt resilience [29,30]. By sequestering MYC2 through direct protein–protein interaction, the overexpression of AsJAZ17 optimizes this hormonal balance, preventing it from antagonizing ABA-mediated protective mechanisms. This targeted regulation directly contributes to a highly efficient ROS-scavenging machinery; consequently, the AsJAZ17-OE lines showed significantly lower levels of H2O2, O2−, and MDA, supported by markedly higher activities of SOD, POD, and CAT under stress. At the transcriptional level, this enhancement of antioxidant capacity is intrinsically linked to the JA signaling module. In established JA signaling models, the central basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factor MYC2 recognizes and binds to conserved sequence elements, such as G-box motifs. Through this regulatory mechanism, MYC2 coordinates the expression of downstream stress-responsive networks, which include genes encoding ROS-scavenging enzymes like SOD, POD, and CAT. By modulating the availability and transcriptional activity of MYC2, AsJAZ17 effectively controls the transcription of these antioxidant genes to maintain ROS homeostasis. Beyond simple detoxification, this improved stress resilience involves a sophisticated regulation of the intracellular redox environment. Current models emphasize the role of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) signaling crosstalk in plant stress adaptation [31]. In this context, the JA signaling module integrates with redox-mediated processes. By regulating the antioxidant defense system, AsJAZ17 assists in maintaining precise ROS/RNS homeostasis. This controlled regulation prevents oxidative toxicity while permitting these reactive species to function as essential secondary messengers within the broader stress response network. Finally, the increased abundance of AsJAZ17 proteins in transgenic lines provides a crucial “buffer pool” against stress-induced degradation. Because JAZ proteins are degraded via the 26S proteasome upon JA perception, a standard plant may quickly deplete its repressor stock during an environmental JA spike. In the OE lines, the larger reservoir of AsJAZ17 ensures that a sufficient population of repressors remains functional to maintain cellular homeostasis and prevent oxidative damage from over-active defense signaling. Notably, the phenomenon of JAZ gene overexpression enhancing abiotic stress tolerance is not restricted to Arabidopsis or garlic; similar findings have been documented in other major crops, including cotton and grape [32,33]. These collective results emphasize that the stabilization of repressors like AsJAZ17 is a strategic adaptation for fine-tuning environmental resilience, positioning it as a vital candidate for molecular breeding programs aimed at improving the yield stability of garlic cultivars.

Although this study verified the physical interaction between AsJAZ17 and MYC2 in garlic, the precise downstream target genes regulated by this module require further investigation. Based on studies in model plants, MYC2 directly activates a series of jasmonate (JA)-responsive genes, including VSP2, as well as key JA biosynthesis genes such as LOX2, AOS, and OPR3 [11,34]. In our study, AsJAZ17 overexpression increased SOD, POD, and CAT activities, indicating that under salt stress, the AsJAZ17–MYC2 module may directly or indirectly regulate these redox homeostasis-related genes. Furthermore, MYC2 can directly activate the transcription of JAZ family members (e.g., JAZ5, JAZ6, and JAZ10) to form a negative feedback loop. This loop is necessary to prevent excessive energy consumption during defense responses and to maintain the growth-defense trade-off.

Consistent with this regulatory role, the robust induction of AsJAZ17 by heat and MeJA indicates its involvement in a broader stress-responsive network beyond salt tolerance. Given its ability to reinforce the antioxidant defense system, AsJAZ17 may contribute to resilience against various abiotic and biotic challenges where oxidative stress is a key factor. Specifically, the interaction with the master regulator MYC2 suggests that AsJAZ17 could act as a ‘molecular brake’ to optimize the growth-defense trade-off during pathogen or herbivore encounters, preventing excessive metabolic resource reallocation. Future research utilizing specific pathogen infection assays on these transgenic lines will be essential to fully elucidate the multi-stress resilience conferred by this module.

However, the resolution of our current findings is limited by the use of bulk tissue transcriptomics. While this approach identifies tissue-preferential expression, it does not account for cell-type-specific heterogeneity. Resolving plant stress responses at cellular resolution is necessary to understand signaling dynamics, as expression and regulation can vary among adjacent cell layers [35]. Applying single-cell and spatial transcriptomics in future studies will provide a required framework to dissect the cellular heterogeneity and spatial regulation of JA-mediated stress responses in garlic.

Although the heterologous Arabidopsis system provided initial functional insights into AsJAZ17, in planta validation in garlic remains a necessary step for crop improvement. Establishing a stable genetic transformation system for garlic is currently difficult due to its large genome and high proportion of repetitive sequences. Future research will focus on utilizing methods such as virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) or optimized CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing protocols to directly evaluate the function of AsJAZ genes in garlic cultivars. Modifying or knocking out AsJAZ17 directly in the garlic background will provide direct evidence of its role in stress regulation and facilitate the molecular breeding of stress-tolerant cultivars.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Genome-Wide Identification of JAZ Genes

Genomic and protein sequences of garlic were retrieved from the AlliumDB database (https://allium.qau.edu.cn/, accessed on 3 March 2025) [36], and Arabidopsis thaliana sequences were obtained from the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 3 March 2025). A. thaliana JAZ protein sequences (AtJAZ) were sourced from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR, version 10, http://www.arabidopsis.org, accessed on 3 March 2025) [37]. A local protein database was established, and BLASTP (v2.11.0) searches (E-value < 1 × 10−5) were conducted using NCBI BLAST+ (v2.11.0) to identify candidate JAZ family members by sequence alignment. The HMM (Hidden Markov Model) profiles of the TIFY domain (PF06200) and the JAS domain (PF09425) were downloaded from the Pfam database (http://pfam-legacy.xfam.org/, accessed on 3 March 2025) and applied with HMMER v3.3.2 (http://hmmer.org/, accessed on 18 March 2025) to further screen potential JAZ proteins [38]. Candidate sequences were validated using SMART 2.8 (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/, accessed on 3 March 2025) [39] and the NCBI Conserved Domain Database (CDD, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd, accessed on 3 March 2025) [40] to confirm domain integrity. Physicochemical properties—sequence length, molecular weight, theoretical isoelectric point, instability index, aliphatic index and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY)—were computed with ProtParam (ExPASy, https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 3 March 2025) [41]. Transmembrane regions were predicted using TMHMM 2.0 (DTU Health Tech, https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/), subcellular localization with Cell-PLoc 2.0 (SJTU, http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc-2/, accessed on 3 March 2025) and secondary structure with SOPMA (I-TASSER, https://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_sopma.html, accessed on 3 March 2025).

4.2. Phylogenetic and Gene Structure Analyses

Full-length JAZ protein sequences from garlic and A. thaliana were retrieved from UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/, accessed on 3 March 2025). Multiple sequence alignment was performed with ClustalX 1.81 (http://www.clustal.org/clustal2/, accessed on 5 March 2025) and manually adjusted in Jalview (v2.11.2.5). A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA 11.0 (https://www.megasoftware.net/) using the Poisson model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Exon–intron structures were inferred by aligning genomic and cDNA sequences and visualized using the Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS 2.0; http://gsds.gao-lab.org/, accessed on 5 March 2025). Conserved motifs were identified with MEME Suite (v5.4.1; http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/intro.html, accessed on 5 March 2025) [42], setting the maximum number of motifs to 10 and motif width between 6 and 50 residues.

4.3. Chromosomal Localization, Duplication and Synteny

Chromosomal coordinates of AsJAZ genes were extracted from the garlic genome GFF3 file and visualized using TBtools v1.09876 (https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools-II, accessed on 10 March 2025) [43]. Tandem and segmental duplication events within the garlic genome were analyzed using MCScanX (http://chibba.pgml.uga.edu/mcscan2/, accessed on 10 March 2025); however, no such duplication events were identified for the AsJAZ family. To further explore the evolutionary history of these genes, interspecific synteny among garlic, onion, and Welsh onion was investigated. The resulting collinear relationships were mapped and displayed using the “Dual Synteny Plotter” module in TBtools [43].

4.4. Cis-Regulatory Element Analysis, Protein–Protein Interaction Network and Gene Ontology Enrichment

Promoter regions (2000 bp upstream of the ATG) for each AsJAZ gene were extracted with TBtools and analyzed for cis-acting elements using PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 15 March 2025) [44]. Identified elements were categorized by function—hormone response, light response, stress response and visualized as heatmaps in HemI v1.0.3.7. For functional annotation, the full-length protein sequences of AsJAZs were submitted to the EggNOG database (http://eggnog5.embl.de/, accessed on 15 March 2025) [45]. Gene Ontology (GO) annotation was then performed and visualized using WEGO (https://wego.genomics.cn/, accessed on 15 March 2025) [46]. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the AsJAZ family was constructed using Cytoscape software (version 3.9.1). First, the protein sequences of JAZ genes were submitted to the STRING database (version 12.0, https://string-db.org/, accessed on 15 March 2025) for interaction prediction. The minimum required interaction score was set to a high-confidence threshold (≥0.700) to ensure the reliability of the predicted interactions. The resulting interaction data were then imported into Cytoscape for network visualization and analysis.

4.5. Plant Material and Stress Treatments

Garlic cultivar ‘Zipi’, maintained at the Onion and Garlic Germplasm Resource Nursery of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, was used in this study. Uniform, disease-free garlic cloves were surface-sterilized in 70% ethanol for 5 min and then rinsed with sterile water. The plants were grown using half-strength Hoagland nutrient solution as the growth medium and germinated at 23–25 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle until seedlings reached 12–15 cm (≈3 weeks). For stress induction and expression analysis, seedlings were exposed to 39 °C (high-temperature stress) [47], 200 mM NaCl (salt stress) [48] or 100 µM MeJA (methyl jasmonate) [49]. To capture early transcriptional responses, leaf samples were harvested at 6, 12, and 24 h post-treatment, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C. For each treatment, three independent biological replicates were collected.

4.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted using the RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) and reverse-transcribed with PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Dalian, China). Gene-specific primers (Table S2) were designed with Primer 5 (Premier Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). qRT–PCR was performed on an FTC-3000P Real-Time PCR System (Funglyn Biotech, Toronto, ON, Canada) using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus, RR820A; TaKaRa Biotechnology). AsGAPDH and AsUBQ were initially tested as candidate reference genes based on previous garlic studies, but due to their variable expression under heat (39 °C), salt (200 mM NaCl) and MeJA (100 µM) stresses, Asβ-actin was ultimately selected for normalization due to its stable expression. Asβ-Actin served as an internal control [50], and the control (CK) plants were used as an external control [51]. Relative expression levels were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method [52]. Regarding tissue-specific expression analysis, the data were obtained from public transcriptome datasets available in the NCBI SRA database (PRJNA243415).

4.7. Subcellular Localization of AsJAZ Proteins

The coding sequences of AsJAZ genes (excluding stop codons) were cloned into the plant expression vector pCAMBIA1302, which contains a CaMV 35S promoter to drive constitutive expression in plants. The resulting GFP fusion constructs and empty vector (control) were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 using the heat-shock method [53]. Transformed Agrobacterium cultures were grown, harvested, and resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, 200 μM acetosyringone, pH 5.6) to an OD600 of 0.8. Agroinfiltration was performed by infiltrating the bacterial suspension into the abaxial sides of fully expanded leaves from 4 to 6-week-old Nicotiana benthamiana plants using a needleless syringe. For co-localization analysis, Agrobacterium cultures harboring GFP constructs were mixed at a 1:1 ratio with those containing organelle-specific markers (NLS-mCherry). After 48–72 h of incubation under standard growth conditions, fluorescence signals of GFP and mCherry were observed using a Nikon C2 Plus confocal laser-scanning microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Bright-field and merged images were also captured. All experiments were performed in at least three independent biological replicates.

4.8. Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H) Assay

The physical interaction between AsJAZ17 and the MYC2 transcription factor (Asa7G03408.1) was verified using the Matchmaker® Gold Yeast Two-Hybrid System (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Dalian, China). The full-length coding sequences of AsJAZ17 and Asa7G03408.1 were cloned into pGBKT7 (bait) and pGADT7 (prey) vectors, respectively, and co-transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain Y2HGold. Transformed yeast cells were initially grown on SD/−Trp/−Leu medium. For interaction assays, confirmed colonies were resuspended and adjusted to an OD600 of 0.1, followed by 10-fold serial dilutions. The yeast suspensions were spotted onto selective media, including SD/−Trp/−Leu/−His and SD/−Trp/−Leu/−His/−Ade, both supplemented with 30 mM 3-AT and X-α-Gal (40 μg/mL) to detect reporter gene expression. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3–5 days. Positive and negative controls were included as references.

4.9. Arabidopsis Transformation and Generation of Transgenic Lines

To generate the overexpression construct, the full-length coding sequence (CDS) of AsJAZ17 was amplified and cloned into the pBI121 vector under the control of the constitutive cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV 35S) promoter. The recombinant plasmid pBI121-AsJAZ17 was subsequently transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. The overexpression construct was introduced into Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia-0, Col-0) via the Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip method. Putative transgenic plants were screened on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (1/2 MS) medium supplemented with 50 mg/L kanamycin. Through self-crossing and antibiotic resistance analysis, three independent T3 homozygous overexpression lines (designated as OE#3, OE#4, and OE#7) were identified and utilized for subsequent experiments.

4.10. Salt Stress Treatment and Physiological Measurements

For salt tolerance assays, surface-sterilized seeds of the wild-type (WT) and transgenic lines were sown in a substrate mixture (vermiculite:perlite:peat moss = 1:1:1, v/v/v) and cultivated under standard conditions (22 °C, 16 h light/8 h dark) for 30 days. The plants were then subjected to salt stress by irrigation with a 100 mM NaCl solution. This specific concentration was selected to effectively differentiate physiological and phenotypic responses in the salt-sensitive Arabidopsis background without causing premature seedling mortality. To allow sufficient time for stress-induced phenotypic and physiological differences to manifest, observations were recorded, and samples were collected 72 h post-treatment. Specifically, 0.2 g of leaf tissue was harvested, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground into a fine powder. The absorbance for the subsequent enzymatic and non-enzymatic assays was recorded using a UH5300 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). SOD activity was determined using the nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) photochemical reduction method [54]. POD activity was measured via the guaiacol method [55], and CAT activity was assessed using a colorimetric assay [56]. The MDA content was determined using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reaction method to evaluate lipid peroxidation [57]. To assess the accumulation of ROS, the H2O2 concentration was measured via the titanium sulfate colorimetric assay [58], and the production rate of the O2− was estimated by the hydroxylamine oxidation method [59].

4.11. Statistical Analysis

All experimental data were obtained from at least three independent biological replicates and are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test or Student’s t-test to determine differences between groups. A p-value < 0.05 was defined as the threshold for statistical significance. All statistical analyses and figure construction were performed using SPSS 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and Origin 2021 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study identified 28 AsJAZ genes in garlic, revealing a significant lineage-specific expansion. While the family maintains core conserved domains, the spatial divergence between the strictly nuclear AsJAZ17 and the nucleocytoplasmic AsJAZ16 points to a sophisticated level of functional compartmentalization. Integrated analysis using PPI modeling and Y2H assays confirmed that AsJAZ17 physically interacts with MYC2, establishing it as a key regulator of salt stress responses within the conserved COI1-JAZ-MYC2 module. Functional validation demonstrated that AsJAZ17 overexpression significantly enhances salt tolerance by optimizing the growth-defense trade-off and reinforcing the ROS-scavenging system. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the garlic JAZ family and identify AsJAZ17 as a promising candidate for improving stress resilience in Allium crops through molecular breeding.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants15101543/s1, Table S1: List of Conserved Motifs and Corresponding Sequences in AsJAZs. Table S2: List of the primers used in the study. Figure S1. A Predicted Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) Network of the A. sativum JAZ Family and Key Interactors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft—N.L. and Z.C.; Investigation, Software, Data curation—N.L.; Visualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing—review and editing—Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Hewedy O.A., Elsheery N.I., Karkour A.M., Neveen E., Arafa R.A., Ghada Abd-Elmonsef M., Mona F.A.D., Hussein W.E., Mansour A., Amin D.H., et al. Jasmonic Acid Regulates Plant Development and Orchestrates Stress Response during Tough Times. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023;208:105260. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fernández-Calvo P., Iñigo S., Glauser G., Vanden Bossche R., Tang M., Li B., De Clercq R., Nagels Durand A., Eeckhout D., Gevaert K., et al. FRS7 and FRS12 recruit NINJA to regulate expression of glucosinolate biosynthesis genes. New Phytol. 2020;227:1124–1137. doi: 10.1111/nph.16586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gomi K. Jasmonic Acid Pathway in Plants 2.0. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:3506. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang Y., Mostafa S., Zeng W., Jin B. Function and Mechanism of Jasmonic Acid in Plant Responses to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:8568. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim H., Seomun S., Yoon Y., Jang G. Jasmonic Acid in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Interaction with Abscisic Acid. Agronomy. 2021;11:1886. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11091886. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhou X.E., Zhang Y., Yao J., Zheng J., Zhou Y., He Q., Moreno J., Lam V.Q., Cao X., Sugimoto K., et al. Assembly of JAZ–JAZ and JAZ–NINJA Complexes in Jasmonate Signaling. Plant Commun. 2023;4:100639. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miccono M.d.l.A., Yang H.-W., DeMott L., Melotto M. Review: Losing JAZ4 for Growth and Defense. Plant Sci. 2023;335:111816. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gupta A., Bhardwaj M., Tran L.-S.P. JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN Family Proteins: Important Nodes in Jasmonic Acid-Abscisic Acid Crosstalk for Regulating Plant Response to Drought. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2021;22:759–766. doi: 10.2174/1389203722666211018114443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen S., Zhang L., Ma Q., Chen M., Cao X., Zhao S., Zhang X. Jasmonate ZIM Domain Protein (JAZ) Gene SLJAZ15 Increases Resistance to Orobanche Aegyptiaca in Tomato. Plants. 2024;13:1493. doi: 10.3390/plants13111493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sun B., Shang L., Li Y., Zhang Q., Chu Z., He S., Yang W., Ding X. Ectopic Expression of OsJAZs Alters Plant Defense and Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:4581. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.He K., Du J., Han X., Li H., Kui M., Zhang J., Huang Z., Fu Q., Jiang Y., Hu Y.R. PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE1 (PHR1) Interacts with JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN (JAZ) and MYC2 to Modulate Phosphate deficiency-induced Jasmonate Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2023;35:2132–2156. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sun X., Zhu S., Li N., Cheng Y., Zhao J., Qiao X., Lu L., Liu S., Wang Y., Liu C., et al. A Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Garlic (Allium sativum) Provides Insights into Genome Evolution and Allicin Biosynthesis. Mol. Plant. 2020;13:1328–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Peška V., Mandáková T., Ihradská V., Fajkus J. Comparative Dissection of Three Giant Genomes: Allium cepa, Allium sativum, and Allium ursinum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:733. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu B., Seong K., Pang S., Song J., Gao H., Wang C., Zhai J., Zhang Y., Gao S., Li X., et al. Functional specificity, diversity, and Redundancy of Arabidopsis JAZ Family Repressors in Jasmonate and COI1-regulated growth, development, and Defense. New Phytol. 2021;231:1525–1545. doi: 10.1111/nph.17477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Han Y., Luthe D. Identification and Evolution Analysis of the JAZ Gene Family in Maize. BMC Genom. 2021;22:256. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07522-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bisht N., Anshu A., Singh P.C., Chauhan P.S. Comprehensive Analysis of OsJAZ Gene Family Deciphers rhizobacteria-mediated Nutrient Stress Modulation in Rice. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;253:126832. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Uebermuth-Feldhaus C., Schoof H. Integrating Differential Expression under Drought with Gene Family Expansion Unique to drought-tolerant Species Prioritizes Candidate Genes for Drought Adaptation in Brassicaceae Species. BMC Genom. 2025;26:571. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11737-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhong Y., Zhang X., Shi Q., Cheng Z.M. Adaptive evolution driving the young duplications in six Rosaceae species. BMC Genom. 2021;22:571. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07422-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Howe G.A., Major I.T., Koo A.J. Modularity in Jasmonate Signaling for Multistress Resilience. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018;69:387–415. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang C., Lei Y., Lu C., Wang L., Wu J. MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 Function Additively in Wounding-induced Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis and Catabolism. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020;62:1159–1175. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Morimoto K., Krahn D., Kaschani F., Hopkinson-Woolley D., Gee A., Buscaill P., Mohammed S., Sieber S.A., Cravatt B.F., Schofield C.J., et al. Broad-range Metalloprotease Profiling in Plants Uncovers Immunity Provided by Defence-related Metalloenzyme. New Phytol. 2022;235:1287–1301. doi: 10.1111/nph.18200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Das P.K., Biswas R., Anjum N., Das A.K., Maiti M.K. Rice Matrix Metalloproteinase OsMMP1 Plays Pleiotropic Roles in Plant Development and symplastic-apoplastic Transport by Modulating Cellulose and Callose Depositions. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:2783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20070-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang P., Yu S., Han X., Xu J., He Q., Xu S., Wang R. Identification, Molecular Characterization and Expression of JAZ Genes in Lycoris Aurea. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0230177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhou S.-L., Zhang J.-X., Jiang S., Lu Y., Huang Y.-S., Dong X.-M., Hu Q., Yao W., Zhang M.-Q., Xiao S.-H. Genome-wide Identification of JAZ Gene Family in Sugarcane and Function Analysis of ScJAZ1/2 in Drought Stress Response and Flowering Regulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024;210:108577. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wu F., Deng L., Zhai Q., Zhao J., Chen Q., Li C. Mediator Subunit MED25 Couples Alternative Splicing of JAZ Genes with Fine-Tuning of Jasmonate Signaling. Plant Cell. 2019;32:429–448. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhao P., Zheng J., Xu Q., Zhao S., Li J., Zhu Y., Yan J., Chen Q., Yang B., Li C., et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the JAZ Gene Family in Rapeseed Reveal JAZ2 and JAZ3 Roles in Drought and Salt Stress Tolerance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025;73:20955–20971. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5c01237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Andrés O., Fonseca S., Franco-Zorrilla J.M., Fernández-Calvo P., Zander M., Lewsey M.G., García-Casado G., Fernández-Barbero G., Ecker J.R., Solano R. The JA-pathway MYC Transcription Factors Regulate Photomorphogenic Responses by Targeting HY5 Gene Expression. Plant J. 2019;102:138–152. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fukazawa J., Mori K., Ando H., Mori R., Kanno Y., Seo M., Takahashi Y. Jasmonate Inhibits Plant Growth and Reduces Gibberellin Levels via microRNA5998 and Transcription Factor MYC2. Plant Physiol. 2023;193:2197–2214. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Luo X., Li C., He X., Zhang X., Zhu L. ABA Signaling Is Negatively Regulated by GbWRKY1 through JAZ1 and ABI1 to Affect Salt and Drought Tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 2019;39:181–194. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02480-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Long T., Yang F., Chen Z., Xing Y., Tang X., Chen B., Cui W., Rodriguez L.G., Wang L., Gao Y., et al. Overexpression of PtoMYB99 Diminishes Poplar Tolerance to Osmotic Stress by Suppressing ABA and JA Biosynthesis. J. Plant Physiol. 2024;292:154149. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ali M., Kaderbek T., Khan M.A., Skalicky M., Brestic M., Elsabagh M., Sabagh A.E. Biosynthesis and multifaceted roles of reactive species in plant defense mechanisms during environmental cues. Plant Stress. 2025;18:101102. doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2025.101102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhao G., Song Y., Wang Q., Yao D., Li D., Qin W., Ge X., Yang Z., Xu W., Su Z., et al. Gossypium Hirsutum Salt Tolerance Is Enhanced by Overexpression of G. Arboreum JAZ1. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020;8:157. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Che L., Lu S., Gou H., Li M., Guo L., Yang J., Mao J. VvJAZ13 Positively Regulates Cold Tolerance in Arabidopsis and Grape. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:4458. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Major I.T., Yoshida Y., Campos M.L., Kapali G., Xin X.F., Sugimoto K., de Oliveira Ferreira D., He S.Y., Howe G.A. Regulation of growth–defense balance by the JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN (JAZ)-MYC transcriptional module. New Phytol. 2017;215:1533–1547. doi: 10.1111/nph.14638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ali M., Wang Z., Guo Q., Wang Y., Cai Y., Du J., Pi E., Ding P., Shen J. Mapping plant cell-type-specific responses to environmental stresses. Trends Plant Sci. 2026 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2026.03.003. epub ahead of print . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yang P., Yuan Y., Yan C., Jia Y., You Q., Da L., Lou A., Bingsheng L., Zhang Z., Liu Y. AlliumDB: A Central Portal for Comparative and Functional Genomics in Allium. Hortic. Res. 2023;11:uhad285. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhad285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Reiser L., Bakker E., Subramaniam S., Chen X., Sawant S., Kartik K., Trilok P., Berardini T.Z. The Arabidopsis Information Resource in 2024. Genetics. 2024;227:iyae027. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyae027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Finn R.D., Clements J., Eddy S.R. HMMER Web server: Interactive Sequence Similarity Searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W29–W37. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Letunic I., Khedkar S., Bork P. SMART: Recent updates, New Developments and Status in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;49:D458–D460. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang J., Chitsaz F., Derbyshire M.K., Gonzales N.R., Gwadz M., Lu S., Marchler G.H., Song J., Thanki N., Yamashita R.A., et al. The Conserved Domain Database in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;51:D384–D388. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Duvaud S., Gabella C., Lisacek F., Stockinger H., Ioannidis V., Durinx C. Expasy, the Swiss Bioinformatics Resource Portal, as Designed by Its Users. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W216–W227. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mistry J., Finn R.D., Eddy S.R., Bateman A., Punta M. Challenges in Homology search: HMMER3 and Convergent Evolution of coiled-coil Regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e121. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen C., Chen H., Zhang Y., Thomas H.R., Frank M.H., He Y., Xia R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant. 2020;13:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lescot M. PlantCARE, a Database of Plant cis-acting Regulatory Elements and a Portal to Tools for in Silico Analysis of Promoter Sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:325–327. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Huerta-Cepas J., Szklarczyk D., Heller D., Hernández-Plaza A., Forslund S.K., Cook H., Mende D.R., Letunic I., Rattei T., Jensen L.J., et al. EggNOG 5.0: A hierarchical, Functionally and Phylogenetically Annotated Orthology Resource Based on 5090 Organisms and 2502 Viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;47:D309–D314. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ye J., Zhang Y., Cui H., Liu J., Wu Y., Cheng Y., Xu H., Huang X., Li S., Zhou A., et al. WEGO 2.0: A Web Tool for Analyzing and Plotting GO annotations, 2018 Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W71–W75. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yang Q.-Q., Fan J.-D., Liu C.-Y., Zhao Y.-Q., Xu Z.-S., Lu X.-J., Ge J., Zhang B.-W., Li M.-Q., Yang Y., et al. Physiological and Transcriptome Analysis of Changes in Endogenous Hormone Contents and Related Synthesis and Signaling Genes during the Heat Stress in Garlic (Allium sativum L.) BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25:464. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06346-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang G.-L., Ren X.-Q., Liu J.-X., Yang F., Wang Y.-P., Xiong A.-S. Transcript Profiling Reveals an Important Role of Cell Wall Remodeling and Hormone Signaling under Salt Stress in Garlic. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019;135:87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Akan S., Tuna Gunes N., Yanmaz R. Methyl Jasmonate and Low Temperature Can Help for Keeping Some Physicochemical Quality Parameters in Garlic (Allium sativum L.) Cloves. Food Chem. 2019;270:546–553. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li N., He B., Cao Z. Genome-Wide Analysis and Functional Characterization of Small Heat Shock Proteins in Allium sativum L. under Multiple Abiotic Stresses. Biology. 2025;14:1326. doi: 10.3390/biology14101326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang G., Tian C., Wang Y., Wan F., Hu L., Xiong A., Tian J. Selection of Reliable Reference Genes for Quantitative RT-PCR in Garlic under Salt Stress. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7319. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yang W., Zhou C., Guo Y., Niu S., El-Kassaby Y.A., Li W. Genome-wide Identification of the Pinus Tabuliformis CONSTANS-like Gene Family and Their Potential Roles in Reproductive Cone Development. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;254:127621. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Beauchamp C., Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved Assays and an Assay Applicable to Acrylamide Gels. Anal. Biochem. 1971;44:276–287. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cleverson D.T.F., Costa J.H., Germano T.A., Ramos M.V., Bezerra L.P. Class III Plant peroxidases: From Classification to Physiological Functions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;263:130306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ogata M., Aikoh H. Mechanism of Metallic Mercury Oxidation in Vitro by Catalase and Peroxidase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1984;33:490–493. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(84)90246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Heath R.L., Packer L. Reprint of: Photoperoxidation in Isolated Chloroplasts I. Kinetics and Stoichiometry of Fatty Acid Peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2022;726:109248. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2022.109248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mátai A., Hideg É. A Comparison of Colorimetric Assays Detecting Hydrogen Peroxide in Leaf Extracts. Anal. Methods. 2017;9:2357–2360. doi: 10.1039/C7AY00126F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Grellet Bournonville C.F., Díaz-Ricci J.C. Quantitative Determination of Superoxide in Plant Leaves Using a Modified NBT Staining Method. Phytochem. Anal. 2011;22:268–271. doi: 10.1002/pca.1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES