Abstract
The complement system bridges innate and adaptive immunity, orchestrating immune surveillance and maintaining tissue homeostasis. This review summarizes the role of the complement system in gastrointestinal-related diseases, including its function in innate immunity, impact on adaptive immunity, and regulatory role under physiological and pathological conditions in the gut. The activation pathways, regulatory mechanisms, and interactions of the complement system with the gut microbiome are crucial for maintaining intestinal homeostasis. Genetic deficiencies or excessive activation of the complement system are closely associated with the development of various intestinal diseases, including infections, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and tumors. This review also explores the role of the complement system in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of the gut and its potential as a therapeutic target. By deepening our understanding of the mechanisms by which the complement system operates in gastrointestinal diseases, we can provide a theoretical foundation for the development of novel treatment strategies.
Keywords: complement system, gastrointestinal-related diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal tumors, therapeutic targets
1. Introduction to complement
1.1. The complement system
Discovered by Jules Bordet in the late 19th century, the complement system was initially defined as a circulating serum system that complements antibody and cell-mediated immune responses. The complement system acts as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity in anti-infectious defense mechanisms. However, genetic deficiencies, functional disorders, and excessive activation of the complement system are associated with the pathology of certain diseases (1–3).
The complement system is an integral part of the innate immune system, consisting of over 50 blood and lymphatic circulation proteins (primarily produced by the liver) and membrane-bound proteins. Protein components, proteases, pattern recognition molecules (PRMs), regulatory factors, and cell surface receptors are crucial for modulating the complement system’s response to different stimuli. Functionally, the complement system can be divided into two main parts: the enzymatic cascade and the lytic pathway (Figure 1). The primary function of the cascade is to assemble convertases, leading to the activation and amplification of the complement system. This includes three activation pathways: the classical pathway, lectin pathway, and alternative pathway. Different microbial components, antigen-antibody complexes, and other exogenous or endogenous substances can activate the complement system by initiating a series of serine protease cascades. The products of complement activation possess biological functions such as regulating phagocytosis (C3b), lysing cells (C5b-9), mediating inflammation (C3a, C5a), modulating immune responses (C3a, C5a, C3b, C3d), and clearing immune complexes (C3b, iC3b) (4, 5).
Figure 1.
Different activation pathways and regulatory mechanisms of the complement system under physiological conditions.
1.2. Complement activation pathways
The classical pathway is primarily triggered by the binding of the C1 complex, which consists of C1q and the serine proteases C1r and C1s, to immunoglobulins on the surface of pathogens (6–8). Additionally, pentraxins, a superfamily of soluble PRMs including C-reactive protein (CRP) and pentraxin 3 (PTX3), recognize and bind to pathogen surface components, which then activate C1q (9). Activation of C1q leads to conformational changes, resulting in the formation of enzymatically active C1r and C1s (10). The resulting C1 enzyme complex mediates the sequential cleavage of C4 and C2, generating the C3 convertase C4b2a (11). In the lectin pathway, pattern recognition molecules include mannose-binding lectin (MBL), ficolins, and collectins, which can directly recognize glycan structures on the surface of pathogens as well as signals emitted by senescent or apoptotic cells (12, 13). Upon activation by these signals, MBL or ficolins undergo conformational changes, and the associated MBL-associated serine proteases (MASP) are activated. Among them, MASP2 cleaves C4 and C2 to form the C3 convertase C4b2a, which is identical to that formed via the classical pathway (14). Pentraxins anchored on pathogen or apoptotic cell surfaces recruit ficolin-2/MASPs to enhance lectin pathway activation, while MBL or ficolin-2 further recruits pentraxins (CRP, PTX3) to engage C1q and amplify the classical pathway (15). Furthermore, MASP3 cleaves pro-factor D to generate active factor D, facilitating the formation of the alternative pathway C3 convertase C3bBb and subsequent C3 cleavage (16, 17). In both the classical and lectin pathways, C3b produced in the previous stage combines with C3 convertase C4b2a to form C5 convertase C4b2a3b. The alternative pathway is continuously active at a low level, and its activation can be facilitated. C3(H2O)Bb cleaves native C3 to generate C3a and C3b (18). Subsequently, factor B, cleaved by factor D, forms the alternative pathway C3 convertase with C3b. The newly generated C3b can combine with the factor B degraded by factor D to form the C3 convertase C3bBb, thus producing a positive feedback effect in the alternative pathway (17, 18). Furthermore, the alternative pathway can be specifically initiated by soluble collectin-12, which recognizes PAMPs and DAMPs and recruits properdin to assemble the alternative pathway C3 convertase (15, 19). In addition, transmembrane collectin-12 interacts with pentraxins (CRP, PTX3) to trigger C1q-dependent classical pathway activation (15, 19). C3b produced in the previous stage of the alternative pathway combines with the C3 convertase C3bBb to form the C5 convertase C3bBb3b. Rather than remaining functionally isolated, these three pathways exhibit mutual cross-activation through coordinated molecular networks composed of pentraxins, collectins, ficolins, and MBL.
The three pathways share convergence points and a common terminal pathway. C5b sequentially binds to C6 and C7. The complex C5b67 exposes membrane-binding sites and non-specifically associates with nearby cell membranes. Subsequently, it binds to C8 and multiple C9 molecules, forming the membrane attack complex (MAC) (20). The insertion of MAC into the cell membrane disrupts the phospholipid bilayer and creates hydrophilic pores. This ultimately leads to a reduction in intracellular osmotic pressure, causing the cells to gradually swell and eventually rupture (20).
1.3. Regulation of complement activation
The complement system is tightly regulated by diverse regulatory proteins that safeguard normal cells against inadvertent damage. These regulators are either membrane-bound or present as soluble factors in the circulating plasma (21).
Soluble complement regulators inhibit activation primarily through three mechanisms: decay-accelerating activity (dissociation of convertases), cofactor function, and proteolytic cleavage. Acting as a plasma serine protease inhibitor, C1-INH regulates the classical pathway by accelerating dissociation of C1r and C1s subunits from antigen-antibody-C1 complexes (22). Additionally, it modulates lectin pathway activation through MASP-2 inactivation (23). C4BP inhibits formation of the C3 convertase (C4b2a) in the classical and lectin pathways by binding to C4b (24). Additionally, it serves as a cofactor for Factor I-mediated cleavage of C4b (25). Similarly, Factor H acts as a cofactor for Factor I-mediated cleavage of C3b, thereby inhibiting formation of the alternative pathway C3 convertase (C3bBb) (26).
Cell surface regulatory proteins inhibit complement activation through three principal mechanisms: decay acceleration, cofactor function, and inhibition of C5b-9 formation. CD55 accelerates decay by dissociating C3 convertases of the classical and alternative pathways (27). CD46 and CR1 possess cofactor function, enabling Factor I to cleave C3b and C4b on the cell surface (28, 29). CD59 binds to C8 and C9 to prevent polymerization of the MAC (30).
2. The role of the complement system in adaptive immunity
The complement system not only forms the MAC to mediate the killing of pathogens but also serves as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity. Upon pathogen invasion, the alternative or lectin pathway triggers a cascade reaction by recognizing pathogen surface components. During this process, some active complement fragments can recruit inflammatory cells. Meanwhile, opsonization mediated by complement fragments, such as C3b and C4b, facilitates the uptake and presentation of antigens by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), thereby initiating adaptive immunity. After the production of specific antibodies, the classical pathway is activated to stimulate C3 activation, leading to a more efficient defense.
2.1. Humoral immunity
Relevant studies have confirmed that a transient decrease in circulating complement C3 levels leads to impaired humoral immunity, indicating the involvement of the complement system in the adaptive immune process. Complement receptors CR2 (CD21) and CR1 (CD35) are primarily expressed on B cells and follicular dendritic cells (FDCs), and they bind to complement cleavage products such as C3d, C3dg, and iC3b (Figure 2). Research has shown that B cells uptake of antigens coated with C3dg can enhance their signaling (31–34). Related research has confirmed that C3d, C3dg, and iC3b, by binding to CR2, become important costimulatory molecules for B cells, significantly reducing the threshold for signal transduction via the B cell receptor (31, 33, 35). CR2 exerts its function by forming B cell co-receptor complex CR2-CD19-CD81 (36–40). The complement-opsonized antigens bind to CR2, which lowers the threshold for B cell activation and provides essential survival signals (34, 37, 39, 41, 42). Additionally, CR2-mediated antigen-independent signaling is necessary for the survival of B cells within germinal centers (43, 44). Guinamard’s research indicates that TI-II antigens localize to marginal zone B cells (MZB cells) by activating the complement system and binding to complement receptors on these cells (45). C3 and CR1/CR2 are essential for this process, highlighting the significance of complement in both T-dependent and T-independent antigen-antibody responses. FDCs located within the germinal centers of lymphoid follicles play a crucial role in the activation, differentiation, and class-switch recombination of B cells and support the formation and maintenance of germinal centers. The relatively high expression of CR2 and CR1 on FDCs provides an effective mechanism for presenting immune complexes coated with complement. These complexes can subsequently be recognized by B cells, thereby enhancing the reactivity of B cells to antigens (35, 44, 46). On FDCs, CR2 and CR1 serve as the primary receptors for capturing and retaining antigens over the long term, thereby contributing to the formation of memory B cells and the establishment of long-lasting immune memory. Anania found that in wild-type mice, FDCs are predominantly located at the boundary between the light and dark zones of the germinal centers, whereas in Cr2-/- mice, FDCs are more frequently observed outside the germinal centers within the follicles (47). Therefore, the absence of CR2 in FDCs may not be the sole reason for impaired germinal center and antibody responses in Cr2-/- mice. The improper organization of FDCs within the germinal centers may also contribute to the inefficiency of the immune response. Despite the normal expression of both receptors on FDCs, experiments in mice with B cell-specific CR1/CR2 deficiency demonstrated that B cells with complement receptor deficiencies led to a severe impairment in T cell-dependent humoral immunity (48). This indicates that the interaction between CR2 or CR1 expressed on B cells and FDCs with C3 cleavage products is crucial for antigen-specific antibody responses. However, Kovács’ study on human palatine tonsil B cells demonstrated that under non-stimulatory concentrations of anti-IgG/A/M, co-clustering of BCR and CR2 enhanced the Ca2+ response but inhibited the expression of activation markers, cytokine production, proliferation, and antibody production (49). Therefore, further investigation is required to determine whether there are significant differences in the genetic background and function of CR2 and CR1 in humans and rodents.
Figure 2.
Follicular B cells in the germinal center undergo differentiation mediated by complement-dependent antigen recognition. Complement fragments (illustrated as C3b) form immune complexes with antigen-bound IgG and bind to the surface receptor CR3 on subcapsular sinus macrophages. Marginal zone B cells in the spleen interact with these immune complexes through the complement receptor CD21. Immune complexes are subsequently transferred to follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) via complement receptor-mediated mechanisms.
Shivshankar found that vascular endothelial cells stimulated by C3a or C5a significantly upregulated the expression of B cell activation markers FasL, CD69, and IL-R1, which may be associated with the increased secretion of IL-1α, IL-6, and IL-8 by the endothelial cells post-stimulation (50). This suggests that anaphylatoxins may activate B cells through chemotaxis and the involvement of vascular endothelial cells. Cumpelik discovered that germinal center B cells, through Bcl-6, either suppress the expression of decay-accelerating factor or promote the expression of CD59, which allows for the normal cleavage of C3 on the B cell surface and prevents the formation of the MAC (51). Ultimately, C3aR1/C5aR1 signaling activates the key survival pathways mTOR and MYC in B cells, which are required for positive selection (51). In summary, the complement system is crucial for the survival and positive selection of B cells, as well as for the formation, maintenance, and function of germinal centers.
2.2. Cellular immunity
The significance of complement proteins lies not only in their ability to enhance immune responses, but also in their role in regulating the type of immune response and influencing the balance among T helper (Th) cell subsets.
2.2.1. The complement system modulates Th cell responses
T cells are regulated by three signals from APCs. APCs present antigens to T cells via MHC class II molecules, inducing their initial activation. The binding of CD80 and CD86 on APCs with CD28 on T cells provides co-stimulation for further activation, while the cytokines produced subsequently promote the proliferation and differentiation of T cells. Cytokines IL-12, IFN-γ, and IL-4 play crucial roles in the polarization of T cells towards Th1 or Th2 phenotypes. TGF-β, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-23 are involved in cell proliferation and differentiation of Th17 cells. In the absence of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TGF-β promotes the differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into regulatory T cells (Tregs) (52). Extensive research has indicated that complement components regulate the maturation of APCs and the expression of cytokines in a paracrine or autocrine manner, thereby influencing the three signals required for APCs to activate T cells (53, 54).
During specific interactions between APCs and T cells, C3 and C5 secreted by both cell types are activated by proteases, including C3 convertases and C5 convertases, with concomitant upregulation of C5aR1 and C3aR1 expression (18, 55, 56) (Figure 3). C3a and C5a bind to receptors expressed on neighboring cells in an autocrine or paracrine manner, and signals from C3aR1 and C5aR1 crosstalk with Toll-like receptors (TLRs) to induce APCs to activate downstream cAMP, ERKs, and NF-κB (57–62). This, in turn, drives the secretion of cytokines such as IL-6, IL-12, IL-23 and TGF-β, and induces the upregulation of costimulatory molecules such as MHC II, CD80 and CD86 (18, 55, 56, 63, 64). C3aR1 is involved in the TLR4-mediated release of IL-1β and IL-6 in human monocytes and promotes the differentiation of CD4+ T cells towards the Th17 lineage without affecting Th1 and Th2 cytokines (60). C5aR1 signaling in macrophages promotes the production of IL-6 and TGF-β induced by TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 (65, 66), yet inhibits IL-12 family cytokines (62, 67, 68), which also induces the autoreactive Th17 differentiation of CD4+ T cells. However, C5a and C3a do not inhibit TLR-induced IL-12 production in dendritic cells (DCs), and these anaphylatoxins promote IL-12 production as well as Th1 responses under lipopolysaccharide stimulation (57, 69, 70). Blockade or deletion of C5aR1 in DCs prevents T cell differentiation towards Th1 and enhances the production of TGF-β, IL-6 and IL-23, inducing T cell differentiation into CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs and Th17 (54).
Figure 3.
Direct effects of complement signalling activation on T cells and antigen-presenting cells.
Membrane-type regulatory protein CD55 (Decay Accelerating Factor, DAF) regulates T-cell immunity. Heeger found that the interaction of APCs with T cells was accompanied by rapid production of complement components and downregulation of CD55 expression, and that the absence of CD55 on APCs and T cells enhanced the induction of effector T cells (71). Liu’s study showed that CD55-/- mice exhibit an enhanced Th1 response, which is characterized by increased secretion of IFN-γ and IL-2 and inhibition of IL-10 following antigenic restimulation (72).
2.2.2. Differential effects of complement under different conditions
Activation of TLRs promotes factor B synthesis and activates the alternative pathway, suggesting a feedback mechanism between TLRs and complement-induced responses (73, 74). In the case of complement crosstalk with TLRs, it acts through DCs, which favor Th1 and inhibit Th17, and through macrophages, which favor Th17 and inhibit Th1. The binding of iC3b to CR3 on APCs induces the production of TGF-β and IL-10, which promotes the production of anti-inflammatory phenotype APCs. The interaction between macrophage CR3 and iC3b-encapsulated apoptotic cells inhibits IL-12, and CR3 signaling downregulates TNF production by modulating TLR7/8-induced degradation of MyD88, which is essential for blocking unwanted inflammation and inducing Th1 cell contraction (75–77). However in DCs, CR3 promotes MyD88-dependent TLR4 signaling and assists in the endocytosis of TLR4, promoting T cell proliferation (78). Similarly, apoptotic cell-bound C1q inhibits macrophage and DC-mediated proliferation of Th1 and Th17 T cell subsets (79, 80). However, C1 upregulates the expression of CD83, CD86, HLA-DR, and CCR7 on the surface of DCs, and C1q promotes the production of IL-12 in DCs, which induces the polarization of CD4+ T cells towards Th1 (81). Overall, complement can promote or inhibit Th1 or Th17 differentiation, depending on the APCs involved, antigen type, and environment.
2.2.3. Complement mediates T cell activation and differentiation
Sustained production of C3a and C5a is also necessary for T cell survival. CD4+ T cells are stocked with C3 in endosomes and lysosomes, and their expressed protease, T cell-expressed protease cathepsin L (CTSL), can process C3 in a non-C3-converting enzyme-dependent manner to produce active C3a and C3b (82). Active C3a binds to C3aR1 on lysosomes and aids in T-cell survival by regulating mTOR phosphorylation (82, 83). Liszewski found that CD4+ T cells from C3-/- mice exhibited an attenuated Th1 response, as autocrine CTSL-mediated C3 activation was inhibited, leading to reduced secretion of Th1-associated cytokines IFN-γ and TNF, while exerting a lesser effect on Th2-associated cytokines IL-4 and IL-5 (82). These findings suggest that the activation of C3 induces T cell differentiation. Strainic found that blockade of C3aR1 and C5aR1 signaling on naive CD4+ T cells resulted in termination of PI3-Kγ and mTOR signaling and increased activation of the kinase PKA, culminating in the initiation of auto-induced signaling by TGF-β1 and differentiation of CD4+ T cells into Foxp3+ Tregs (84). Kwan found that signaling through C3aR1 and C5aR1 reduced the inhibitory activity of CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ Treg cells (85). These findings suggest that C3a and C5a are involved in the induction of Tregs and regulation of cellular functions.
Co-stimulation of CD3 and the complement regulatory protein CD46 induces distinct T cell phenotypes depending on the cytokine milieu. Under low IL-2 conditions, CD3/CD46 co-stimulation promotes Th1 cell differentiation characterized by robust IFN-γ production (86, 87). Conversely, when IL-2 levels are high, CD46 engagement drives a switch from the Th1 phenotype to a regulatory phenotype (Type 1 Regulatory T cell, Tr1), marked by high IL-10 secretion (86, 88–91). This IL-2-dependent transition is mediated by the nuclear translocation of the transcriptional repressor ICER/CREM that attenuates IL-2 production. Furthermore, this process involves signaling through the CD46-CYT1 isoform via the serine-threonine kinase SPAK (86, 92). Meanwhile, CD46 activation links the complement system to T cell immunity through intracellular C5a generation. CD3/CD46 co-stimulation triggers intracellular C5 cleavage, generating C5a, which binds to C5aR1 and drives NLRP3 inflammasome activation in CD4+ T cells (93). This leads to caspase-1-dependent IL-1β secretion, which in an autocrine manner enhances IFN-γ production and promotes Th1 responses (93).
The molecular mechanism underlying CD46-mediated regulation involves crosstalk with the Notch signaling pathway. Jagged1, a canonical Notch ligand, also functions as a physiological ligand for CD46 (94–96). On resting T cells, CD46 sequesters Jagged1, preventing its interaction with Notch receptors and thereby acting as a “molecular brake” on T cell activation (92, 94). Upon TCR activation, CD46 is downregulated, releasing Jagged1 to engage Notch1 and promote Th1 differentiation (94, 96). This spatiotemporal regulation of the CD46-Jagged1-Notch axis is critical for coordinating the initial IFN-γ response and the subsequent transition to IL-10-mediated regulation (94). Thus, CD46 employs distinct mechanisms—ICER/CREM nuclear translocation to attenuate IL-2 production, complement-mediated NLRP3 activation for Th1 induction, and Notch-dependent transcriptional regulation for the Th1-to-Tr1 switch—to temporally regulate T cell responses during different phases of immune activation (86, 93).
Additionally, C5aR2, the second C5a receptor, acts as a negative regulator of C5aR1 and independently regulates T cell differentiation through lipid mediators. C5aR2 sequesters excess C5a and signals via β-arrestins, while forming heterodimers with C5aR1 to promote their internalization and prevent overactivation (97). Activation of C5aR2 orchestrates a shift from prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) dominance to enhanced prostacyclin (PGI2) (98). PGI2 autocrine signaling through PGI2 receptor activates PKA-CREB to induce IL-1R2, a decoy receptor that neutralizes intrinsic IL-1β and licenses IL-10 expression, thereby enabling Th1 cell contraction (98).
3. Complement and the gut
Activation of the complement system produces a variety of active fragments with important biological effects involved in immune regulation and inflammatory responses. Activation of the complement system is regulated by various mechanisms, such as soluble and cell membrane surface complement regulatory proteins that control key enzyme activities and MAC assembly. Thus, dysfunction and defects in complement components can lead to complement dysregulation, which in turn leads to the onset and progression of pathological processes (99–103). Enterocytes highly express various complement components that are thought to be essential for the gut epithelium to fulfil its functions (104). The gut not only provides an important physical barrier between the host and the environment, but also is essential for nutrient, electrolyte and water absorption, for inducing tolerance to normal microbiota, and for mounting immune responses against pathogens (105). Complement dysfunction can lead to a variety of diseases, including infections, inflammatory bowel disease and tumors (106, 107). Although the effectiveness and importance of the complement system in the haematological system during immunity to pathogens has been studied in detail, the contribution of the complement system to intestinal barrier function remains unclear.
3.1. Intestinal complement under physiological conditions
The intestine harbors a functionally distinct complement system that operates independently from circulating blood complement. Unlike systemic complement, intestinal complement is selectively expressed to maintain tolerance toward commensal microbiota while preserving rapid pathogen defense capabilities (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Complement-mediated regulation of gut barrier function and immune cell activity.
C3 serves as the central regulator of intestinal immune homeostasis. Under steady-state conditions, intestinal C3 expression is tightly regulated and induced by the local microbiota (108). Studies in both C3-deficient mice and human patients demonstrate that C3 deficiency disrupts intestinal immune balance, shifting cytokine profiles from anti-inflammatory to pro-inflammatory states and increasing systemic IgG responses against commensal bacteria (108). However, the terminal complement components (C5-C9) that form MAC are expressed at minimal levels in the healthy gut, suggesting that intestinal complement primarily functions through opsonization rather than direct lysis (108). Upon mucosal infection, the intestinal complement system undergoes rapid activation. The expression of C3 and alternative pathway factor B becomes significantly upregulated, with intestinal stromal cells serving as the predominant source of local C3 synthesis. This localized production enables neutrophil-mediated phagocytosis through C3b opsonization, effectively clearing invading pathogens (108). Notably, under physiological conditions, limited neutrophil presence in the intestinal lumen prevents excessive complement-mediated clearance of beneficial commensals (108). This spatial restriction ensures that large-scale phagocytosis occurs only during active infection while preserving microbiota stability.
Intestinal complement components also regulate antigen surveillance and adaptive immunity. C5aR1 expressed on microfold cells facilitates mucosal antigen sampling. However, certain pathogens exploit C5aR1-TLR crosstalk (involving TLR1/2 and TLR4) to evade immune clearance (109, 110). In Peyer’s patches, C5aR1 activation on LysoDCs enhances intracellular ROS production, thereby improving antigen cross-presentation and triggering pathogen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses (111, 112). Additionally, IL-22 reinforces mucosal defense by upregulating hepatic C3 synthesis and promoting C3 deposition on bacterial surfaces (73, 113).
Beyond immune defense, complement signaling maintains intestinal barrier integrity and tissue regeneration. The complement regulatory protein CD46 stimulates intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and accelerates wound healing through direct interaction between the cytoplasmic kinase SPAK and the transmembrane adhesion molecule E-cadherin (114). Concurrently, C3a-C3aR1 signaling activates Wnt pathways, upregulating intestinal stem cell markers (Lgr5+) and proliferation markers (Ki67). This axis promotes epithelial regeneration following mucosal injury, highlighting the dual role of intestinal complement in both immune surveillance and tissue homeostasis (115).
3.2. Immune evasion by pathogens
While the gut microbiome has been extensively studied in terms of its composition and function, research on how specific mucosal-adherent bacteria interact with the complement system at the mucosal interface remains limited. Since these mucosa-associated bacteria are in close contact with intestinal epithelial cells, they constitute an important group that is thought to play a major role in inflammation in patients with IBD (116). The three complement pathways centered on C3 achieve lysis of gram-negative bacteria by driving the formation of MAC or by promoting phagocytosis and killing by neutrophils and macrophages. In contrast, pathogens impair complement-mediated recognition and bacterial killing by inhibiting the complement cascade.
3.2.1. Binding to complement regulatory proteins
Some pathogenic bacteria have surface proteins that confer resistance to complement, such as Rck, TraT, PagC, Ail, which can recruit complement regulatory proteins to inhibit the formation of C3 convertase, thereby hindering the complement cascade and the formation of the MAC. Ail is a 17 kDa Yersinia enterocolitica outer membrane protein that mediates adhesion to and invasion of intestinal epithelial cells. It was found that the Y. enterocolitica serum resistance protein Ail binds the complement regulatory protein C4b to evade complement-mediated clearance in the human host (117). Derek K. Ho found that Rck expressed in Escherichia coli binds factor H in human serum to inhibit alternative pathway-mediated C3b and MAC deposition, and this study demonstrates that factor H binding to Rck promotes factor I-mediated C3b cleavage (118). The team also found that Rck recruits and binds C4BP to inhibit C3b and MAC deposition mediated by the classical or lectin pathways (119). The gene pagC, activated by the two-component system PhoP-PhoQ in Salmonella enterica, has a significant effect on the formation of bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). OMVs produced by PagC-expressing bacteria can bind complement component C3b in a dose-dependent manner and recruit factor H to inactivate it (120). Homologous proteins Ail, Rck, and PagC, with high sequence similarity in transmembrane structural domains, may have structures particularly suited for recruiting complement regulatory proteins, which results in inefficient recognition of pathogens by complement receptors on phagocytes and impaired complement-mediated opsonization (121, 122). Inhibition of key nodes in the complement pathway increases the chances of pathogens escaping complement attack, and increasing evidence also suggests that these pathogens have the ability to bind multiple complement regulatory proteins. Among the various complement-avoidance mechanisms, the recruitment of complement regulatory proteins is by far the most widely used strategy for escaping complement attack (123).
3.2.2. Cleavage of complement components
Pathogen proteases, such as the serine protease Pic produced by Shigella fowleri and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, can directly cleave complement components to block the complement cascade. Specifically, Pic cleaves C2 and C4, components of the classical and lectin pathways, and synergizes with factors I and H (124). The surface protease PgtE from Salmonella is able to cleave the C3b, C4b, and C5 components of the complement system (125). Additionally, the toxin PET from enteroaggregative E. coli can cleave C3, C5, and C9 components, thereby inhibiting the formation of the MAC (126). Sorbara discovered that C3-encapsulated Listeria monocytogenes is targeted by autophagy through direct C3/ATG16L1 interactions, resulting in autophagy-dependent growth restriction, while some Enterobacteriaceae such as Shigella and Salmonella can escape from C3-dependent growth restriction via shedding C3 mediated by the proteases IcsP and PgtE (127).
The human gut is colonized by a large number of different microorganisms, and this rich and diverse microbial ecosystem plays a crucial role in maintaining epithelial barrier integrity. Research has shown that intestinal dysbiosis is closely associated with intestinal inflammation, and alterations in the composition of gut microbiota may lead to impaired physiological functions and are associated with a range of human diseases, such as metabolic disorders, inflammatory diseases, and tumorigenesis (128–130). Understanding the complex interactions between the gut microbiota and mucosal immune system could potentially lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies for treating gut-related diseases.
3.3. Inflammatory diseases of the intestine
3.3.1. Inflammatory bowel disease
As a group of chronic, recurrent inflammatory diseases of the intestine, IBD is divided into two well-defined subtypes: Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). UC is confined to the colon and presents with severe mucosal inflammation and submucosal ulcers. In contrast, CD is characterized by discontinuous transmural inflammation that can affect all layers of the gastrointestinal tract (131). Continued activation and imbalance in the regulation of the intestinal complement system disrupts the barrier function of the gut, leading to severe intestinal inflammation in patients with IBD (132–136). Deposits of MAC and immune complexes in the colonic submucosal vessel wall of patients with IBD suggest that local complement activation occurs in intestinal lesions (137–139). Enhanced expression of C3 and IL-17 in the inflamed mucosa of patients has been found (140), and the TLR4-C3 axis can control the intestinal immune response during chronic colitis (141), suggesting a correlation between the complement system and the pathogenesis of IBD. In lesions of active UC, complement activation is often observed along the brush border of surface epithelial cells, which correlates with the presence of IgG1 autoantibodies (142). In patients with UC, hTM5-specific IgG autoantibodies present in the serum promote C3b deposition and destruction of colonic epithelial cells, indicating a potential direct pathogenic role (143). Autoantibodies trigger complement attack on the brush border antigens of colonic epithelial cells, leading to their lysis (142). In CD, epithelial deposition of C3b and MAC in the absence of IgG and classical components (C1q and C4c) has been reported (144). Factor B is significantly overexpressed in the intestinal mucosa of patients with CD, where its biosynthesis is regulated by TLR3 (145). Moreover, genetic coding variants in Factor B are associated with increased susceptibility to perianal CD (146). These findings suggest that alternative pathway activation is more prominent in CD.
3.3.2. Colitis
Mice lacking C3 or factor B were protected against acute DSS-induced colitis, whereas those deficient in C1q and MBL displayed increased severity of colonic inflammation (147, 148). Targeted inhibition of the complement system using CR2-Crry, which blocks all pathways, or CR2-fH, which targets the alternative pathway, led to a significant increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (147). Furthermore, deletion of C3aR1 or C5aR1 significantly reduced the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (149–151). In the DSS-induced chronic colitis model, mice with deficiencies in complement proteins C1q, MBL, or C3 showed heightened mucosal damage and increased susceptibility to infections, whereas mice lacking factor B showed mitigated mucosal damage (152). In contrast, administration of CR2-fH attenuated the inflammatory response and fibrosis, while also reducing the infiltration of intestinal B cells, macrophages, and DCs (152). In chronic colitis, C5aR1-/- mice showed severe tissue damage, increased granulocyte infiltration, and lower IL-4 mRNA levels, suggesting that C5aR1 plays a role in modulating the polarization of Th cells towards a Th2 phenotype (150). This highlights the distinct roles that C5aR1 plays in acute versus chronic colitis, indicating that its function may vary depending on the disease phase. Inhibition of the C3a-C3aR1 axis during different stages of colitis can modulate the expression of caspase-11 and inflammatory factors, which in turn influences the disease prognosis (153).
The above suggests that the classical or lectin pathway has a role in protecting the mucosa from injury and infection, whereas the alternative pathway is closely related to the pathogenesis of colitis and the immune response, and that complement may have a dual role at different stages of inflammation.
3.4. Complement and intestinal tumors
The TME plays a key role in cancer development, progression, metastasis, recurrence, and drug resistance, with cancer cells, stromal cells such as immune cells and fibroblasts, and extracellular components constituting the TME (154–156). Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are the primary immunosuppressive cell types that infiltrate the TME (157). Additionally, tumor proliferation and invasion are associated with DCs, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and Tregs (158–160). The TME is rich in complement proteins, and there is evidence suggesting that these components may be pro-tumorigenic and immunosuppressive within the TME (161, 162). As both tumor cells and stromal cells produce abnormal complement proteins, the abnormal activation of the complement system in the TME promotes tumor development (Figure 5). This occurs by inhibiting inflammation and stromal cell immunity, as well as by enhancing tumor cell proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and migratory spread (161–163).
Figure 5.
Complement system-driven immune modulation in tumor growth and metastasis.
3.4.1. Complement and complement receptors in TME
Serum C3a concentrations were found to be increased in patients with colon cancer, and high levels of C3 were associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer as well as with levels of immune cell infiltration (164, 165). Inhibiting C3 levels can potentially suppress tumor progression by enhancing effective immune responses against tumors, increasing sensitivity to radiotherapy, and reducing the immunosuppressive effects of the TME (166–168).
Studies using chimeric mouse models suggest that the pathogenesis of colitis-associated colorectal cancer is linked to C3 originating from myeloid cells rather than non-myeloid cells (169). In small bowel tumors, complement activation leads to C3a-dependent neutrophil activation and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (170). This process results in a hypercoagulable state of the blood, which contributes to the metastatic spread of the tumor.
High C3ar1 expression in patients with colorectal cancer contributes to the production of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by maintaining NK cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and DCs in a resting state (171). Mechanistically, tumor cell-derived C3a drives M2 macrophage polarization via the C3a-C3aR1-PI3Kγ signaling axis, thereby suppressing anti-tumor immunity (172). Adhesion and migration of NK cells are regulated by lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1). Physical interaction between C3aR1 and LFA-1 on NK cells maintains LFA-1 in a high-affinity conformation, thereby inhibiting NK cell infiltration into tumors (173). These findings suggest that the C3a-C3aR1 axis can suppress CD8+ T cell responses and prevent NK-cell infiltration, thereby creating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In the C3aR1-/- mouse model, the absence of C3aR1 in the colon activates a microbiota-mediated inflammatory response. This response results in the TME with a pronounced immune infiltrate characterized by Th1, Th17, and cytotoxic T cells (171). This shift promotes the transition from a cold to a hot tumor, making it more susceptible to immune checkpoint-blocking therapy (171).
C5aR1 on myeloid cells is essential for colorectal tumorigenesis. The recruitment of MDSCs through C5a-C5aR1 signaling contributes to the suppression of CD8+ T cells and can modulate the local production of a variety of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, resulting in a pro-tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment (174). TAMs also express C5aR1, and their expression of C5aR1 is negatively correlated with the degree of tumor differentiation. Related studies have found that C5a can mediate the polarization of macrophages to the M2 type and promote tumor metastasis to the liver through the NF-κB pathway (175). C5 can be cleaved in a convertase-independent manner in colonic epithelial cells, in addition to its cleavage by myeloid cells. Aberrant activation of β-catenin is an important factor in colorectal cancer. C5a-C5aR1 signaling triggers the assembly of intracellular C5aR1 with KCTD5/cullin3/Roc-1 and β-catenin complexes. This interaction promotes the polyubiquitination of β-catenin from K48 to K63, thereby facilitating colorectal tumorigenesis (176).
3.4.2. Complement regulatory proteins in TME
Studies have shown that CD46, CD55, and CD59 are up-regulated in colorectal cancer. In particular, the expression levels of CD55 and CD59 correlate with the degree of differentiation and the TNM (Tumor-Node-Metastasis) stage of the cancer (177). Additionally, CD46 is also significantly overexpressed in colorectal cancer tissues and cell lines, and its expression is positively associated with tumor invasion and advanced stages (178). CD46, CD55, and CD59 have been identified as potential biomarkers for poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients (165, 178–180).
It has been found that knocking down CD55 induces apoptosis in tumor cells, thereby reducing the growth of colon cancer in mice (181). Additionally, the expression of CD55 is associated with the induction of a hypoxic environment and regulated by the STAT3/STAT6/p38MAPK signaling pathway (178, 181). Similarly, CD46 transcription is directly controlled by STAT3/STAT6/p38 MAPK signaling in colon cancer cells (178). Knockdown of CD46 or CD59 alone significantly triggers caspase-dependent apoptosis, increases MAC deposition, and suppresses colorectal cancer growth in mice (178, 182). Moreover, CD59 enables tumor cells to evade complement-dependent cytotoxicity by blocking the assembly of the terminal complement complex, and its high expression is associated with shorter disease-specific survival (180).
Recent studies have revealed the emergence of new B-cell subpopulations in patients with tumors after chemotherapy (183). These subpopulations activate T-cell-associated anti-tumor immunity via ICOSL, a process regulated by the complement regulatory protein CD55. CD55 expression was negatively correlated with the number of ICOSL+ B cells. Targeting CD55 promotes the production of ICOSL+ B cells, which in turn enhances anti-tumor immunity after chemotherapy (183). Furthermore, silencing CD46 or CD59 markedly sensitizes colon cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin, providing a rational combination strategy for chemotherapy (178, 182). Thus, targeting complement regulatory proteins (CD46, CD55, CD59) may serve as an innovative strategy to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy-based treatments.
The role of the complement system in tumors is complex and multifaceted. It can either act as part of tumor immune surveillance or promote tumor immune escape and progression. Therefore, an in-depth study of the mechanisms by which the complement system influences tumors is crucial for developing new strategies in tumor immunotherapy.
4. Conclusion
The complement system plays a multifaceted role in intestinal health and disease. It is involved not only in the defense response against pathogens but also in regulating the gut immune response and inflammatory processes. Disorders of the complement system are associated with the development of IBD and intestinal tumors, making them potential therapeutic targets. Future research should further explore the specific mechanisms by which the complement system contributes to intestinal diseases and how these diseases can be treated by modulating the complement system. With a deeper understanding of the role of the complement system in the gut, we can look forward to developing novel therapeutic strategies to improve the prognosis of intestinal diseases and enhance patients’ quality of life.
Acknowledgments
We extend our heartfelt thanks to all those who have provided support and assistance throughout the course of this research.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2022YFS0622).The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Edited by: Yukihiro Yamaguchi, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
Reviewed by: Ying Jie Ma, Aalborg University, Denmark
Luan Gavião Prado, Cleveland Clinic, United States
Author contributions
BY: Resources, Software, Writing – original draft. ZL: Resources, Software, Writing – review & editing. BL: Resources, Software, Writing – review & editing. JL: Resources, Software, Writing – review & editing. ZZ: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1. Reis ES, Mastellos DC, Hajishengallis G, Lambris JD. New insights into the immune functions of complement. Nat Rev Immunol. (2019) 19:503–16. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0168-x. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. de Cordoba SR, Tortajada A, Harris CL, Morgan BP. Complement dysregulation and disease: from genes and proteins to diagnostics and drugs. Immunobiology. (2012) 217:1034–46. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.07.021. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Carroll MC. The complement system in regulation of adaptive immunity. Nat Immunol. (2004) 5:981–6. doi: 10.1038/ni1113. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Merle NS, Church SE, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Roumenina LT. Complement system part I - molecular mechanisms of activation and regulation. Front Immunol. (2015) 6:262. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00262. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Merle NS, Noe R, Halbwachs-Mecarelli L, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Roumenina LT. Complement system part II: role in immunity. Front Immunol. (2015) 6:257. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00257. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mortensen SA, Sander B, Jensen RK, Pedersen JS, Golas MM, Thiel S, et al. Models of the complement C1 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2018) 115:E3866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803577115. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mortensen SA, Sander B, Jensen RK, Pedersen JS, Golas MM, Jensenius JC, et al. Structure and activation of C1, the complex initiating the classical pathway of the complement cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2017) 114:986–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616998114. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Almitairi JOM, Venkatraman Girija U, Furze CM, Simpson-Gray X, Badakshi F, Marshall JE, et al. Structure of the C1r-C1s interaction of the C1 complex of complement activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2018) 115:768–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718709115. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Garlanda C, Bottazzi B, Magrini E, Inforzato A, Mantovani A. PTX3, a humoral pattern recognition molecule, in innate immunity, tissue repair and cancer. Physiol Rev. (2018) 98:623. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00016.2017. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ugurlar D, Howes SC, de Kreuk B-J, Koning RI, de Jong RN, Beurskens FJ, et al. Structures of C1-IgG1 provide insights into how danger pattern recognition activates complement. Science. (2018) 359:794–7. doi: 10.1126/science.aao4988. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sharp TH, Boyle AL, Diebolder CA, Kros A, Koster AJ, Gros P. Insights into IgM-mediated complement activation based on in situ structures of IgM-C1-C4b. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2019) 116:11900–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901841116. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gao T, Zhu L, Liu H, Zhang X, Wang T, Fu Y, et al. Highly pathogenic coronavirus N protein aggravates inflammation by MASP-2-mediated lectin complement pathway overactivation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2022) 7:318. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01133-5. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ogden CA, deCathelineau A, Hoffmann PR, Bratton D, Ghebrehiwet B, Fadok VA, et al. C1q and mannose binding lectin engagement of cell surface calreticulin and CD91 initiates macropinocytosis and uptake of apoptotic cells. J Exp Med. (2001) 194:781–95. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.6.781. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hor L, Pan J, Pike RN, Wijeyewickrema LC. Molecular interactions required for activation of complement component C2 include exosites located on the serine protease domain of C1s and mannose-binding lectin associated protease-2. J Immunol. (2024) 212:1172–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300042. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ma YJ, Parente R, Zhong H, Sun Y, Garlanda C, Doni A. Complement-pentraxins synergy: navigating the immune battlefield and beyond. BioMed Pharmacother. (2023) 169:115878. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115878. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hayashi M, Machida T, Ishida Y, Ogata Y, Omori T, Takasumi M, et al. Cutting edge: role of MASP-3 in the physiological activation of factor D of the alternative complement pathway. J Immunol. (2019) 203:1411–6. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900605. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Sekine H, Machida T, Fujita T. Factor D. Immunol Rev. (2023) 313:15–24. doi: 10.1111/imr.13155. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Elvington M, Liszewski MK, Bertram P, Kulkarni HS, Atkinson JP. A C3(H20) recycling pathway is a component of the intracellular complement system. J Clin Invest. (2017) 127:970–81. doi: 10.1172/JCI89412. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ma YJ, Lee BL, Garred P. An overview of the synergy and crosstalk between pentraxins and collectins/ficolins: their functional relevance in complement activation. Exp Mol Med. (2017) 49:e320. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.51. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Parsons ES, Stanley GJ, Pyne ALB, Hodel AW, Nievergelt AP, Menny A, et al. Single-molecule kinetics of pore assembly by the membrane attack complex. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:2066. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10058-7. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zipfel PF, Skerka C. Complement regulators and inhibitory proteins. Nat Rev Immunol. (2009) 9:729–40. doi: 10.1038/nri2620. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Davis AE, Mejia P, Lu F. Biological activities of C1 inhibitor. Mol Immunol. (2008) 45:4057–63. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.06.028. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kerr FK, Thomas AR, Wijeyewickrema LC, Whisstock JC, Boyd SE, Kaiserman D, et al. Elucidation of the substrate specificity of the MASP-2 protease of the lectin complement pathway and identification of the enzyme as a major physiological target of the serpin, C1-inhibitor. Mol Immunol. (2008) 45:670–7. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.07.008. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rawal N, Rajagopalan R, Salvi VP. Stringent regulation of complement lectin pathway C3/C5 convertase by C4b-binding protein (C4bp). Mol Immunol. (2009) 46:2902–10. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.07.006. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Blom AM, Villoutreix BO, Dahlbäck B. Mutations in alpha-chain of C4BP that selectively affect its factor I cofactor function. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:43437–42. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306620200. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Laskowski J, Renner B, Le Quintrec M, Panzer S, Hannan JP, Ljubanovic D, et al. Distinct roles for the complement regulators factor H and crry in protection of the kidney from injury. Kidney Int. (2016) 90:109–22. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.02.036. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lukacik P, Roversi P, White J, Esser D, Smith GP, Billington J, et al. Complement regulation at the molecular level: the structure of decay-accelerating factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2004) 101:1279–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307200101. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Schack VR, Herlin MK, Pedersen H, Jensen JMB, Færch M, Bundgaard B, et al. Novel homozygous CD46 variant with C‐isoform expression affects C3b inactivation in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Eur J Immunol. (2022) 52:1610–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.202249838. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Foley JH, Peterson EA, Lei V, Wan LW, Krisinger MJ, Conway EM. Interplay between fibrinolysis and complement: plasmin cleavage of iC3b modulates immune responses. J Thromb Haemost. (2015) 13:610–8. doi: 10.1111/jth.12837. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Couves EC, Gardner S, Voisin TB, Bickel JK, Stansfeld PJ, Tate EW, et al. Structural basis for membrane attack complex inhibition by CD59. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:890. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36441-z. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. van den Elsen JMH, Isenman DE. A crystal structure of the complex between human complement receptor 2 and its ligand C3d. Science. (2011) 332:608–11. doi: 10.1126/science.1201954. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Platt JL, Silva I, Balin SJ, Lefferts AR, Farkash E, Ross TM, et al. C3d regulates immune checkpoint blockade and enhances antitumor immunity. JCI Insight. (2017) 2:e90201, 90201. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.90201. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lee Y, Haas KM, Gor DO, Ding X, Karp DR, Greenspan NS, et al. Complement component C3d-antigen complexes can either augment or inhibit B lymphocyte activation and humoral immunity in mice depending on the degree of CD21/CD19 complex engagement. J Immunol. (2005) 175:8011–23. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.8011. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hess MW, Schwendinger MG, Eskelinen EL, Pfaller K, Pavelka M, Dierich MP, et al. Tracing uptake of C3dg-conjugated antigen into B cells via complement receptor type 2 (CR2, CD21). Blood. (2000) 95:2617–23. doi: 10.1182/blood.v95.8.2617.008k20_2617_2623. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Carroll MC, Isenman DE. Regulation of humoral immunity by complement. Immunity. (2012) 37:199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.08.002. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Susa KJ, Seegar TC, Blacklow SC, Kruse AC. A dynamic interaction between CD19 and the tetraspanin CD81 controls B cell co-receptor trafficking. Elife. (2020) 9:e52337. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52337. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Cherukuri A, Cheng PC, Sohn HW, Pierce SK. The CD19/CD21 complex functions to prolong B cell antigen receptor signaling from lipid rafts. Immunity. (2001) 14:169–79. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00098-x. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Wang K, Wei G, Liu D. CD19: a biomarker for B cell development, lymphoma diagnosis and therapy. Exp Hematol Oncol. (2012) 1:36. doi: 10.1186/2162-3619-1-36. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Barrington RA, Schneider TJ, Pitcher LA, Mempel TR, Ma M, Barteneva NS, et al. Uncoupling CD21 and CD19 of the B-cell coreceptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2009) 106:14490–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903477106. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Wang RY, Bare P, De Giorgi V, Matsuura K, Salam KA, Grandinetti T, et al. Preferential association of hepatitis C virus with CD19+ B cells is mediated by complement system. Hepatology. (2016) 64:1900–10. doi: 10.1002/hep.28842. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wentink MWJ, Lambeck AJA, van Zelm MC, Simons E, van Dongen JJM, IJspeert H, et al. CD21 and CD19 deficiency: two defects in the same complex leading to different disease modalities. Clin Immunol. (2015) 161:120–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.08.010. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Thiel J, Kimmig L, Salzer U, Grudzien M, Lebrecht D, Hagena T, et al. Genetic CD21 deficiency is associated with hypogammaglobulinemia. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2012) 129:801–810.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.09.027. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Rossbacher J, Haberman AM, Neschen S, Khalil A, Shlomchik MJ. Antibody-independent B cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic roles for CD21/35. Eur J Immunol. (2006) 36:2384–93. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636172. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Donius LR, Handy JM, Weis JJ, Weis JH. Optimal germinal center B cell activation and T-dependent antibody responses require expression of the mouse complement receptor Cr1. J Immunol. (2013) 191:434–47. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203176. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Guinamard R, Okigaki M, Schlessinger J, Ravetch JV. Absence of marginal zone B cells in Pyk-2-deficient mice defines their role in the humoral response. Nat Immunol. (2000) 1:31–6. doi: 10.1038/76882. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Fearon DT, Carroll MC. Regulation of B lymphocyte responses to foreign and self-antigens by the CD19/CD21 complex. Annu Rev Immunol. (2000) 18:393–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.393. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Anania JC, Westin A, Adler J, Heyman B. A novel image analysis approach reveals a role for complement receptors 1 and 2 in follicular dendritic cell organization in germinal centers. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:655753. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.655753. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zhang L, Ding Z, Xu H, Heyman B. Marginal zone B cells transport IgG3-immune complexes to splenic follicles. J Immunol. (2014) 193:1681–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400331. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Kovács KG, Mácsik-Valent B, Matkó J, Bajtay Z, Erdei A. Revisiting the coreceptor function of complement receptor type 2 (CR2, CD21); coengagement with the B-cell receptor inhibits the activation, proliferation, and antibody production of human B cells. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:620427. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.620427. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Shivshankar P, Li Y-D, Mueller-Ortiz SL, Wetsel RA. In response to complement anaphylatoxin peptides C3a and C5a, human vascular endothelial cells migrate and mediate the activation of B-cells and polarization of T-cells. FASEB Journal: Off Publ Fed Am Societies For Exp Biol. (2020) 34:7540–60. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902397R. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Cumpelik A, Heja D, Hu Y, Varano G, Ordikhani F, Roberto MP, et al. Dynamic regulation of B cell complement signaling is integral to germinal center responses. Nat Immunol. (2021) 22:757–68. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00926-0. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kapsenberg ML. Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nat Rev Immunol. (2003) 3:984–93. doi: 10.1038/nri1246. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kemper C, Köhl J. Novel roles for complement receptors in T cell regulation and beyond. Mol Immunol. (2013) 56:181–90. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2013.05.223. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Weaver DJ, Reis ES, Pandey MK, Köhl G, Harris N, Gerard C, et al. C5a receptor-deficient dendritic cells promote induction of Treg and Th17 cells. Eur J Immunol. (2010) 40:710–21. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939333. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Strainic MG, Liu J, Huang D, An F, Lalli PN, Muqim N, et al. Locally produced complement fragments C5a and C3a provide both costimulatory and survival signals to naive CD4+ T cells. Immunity. (2008) 28:425–35. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.02.001. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lalli PN, Strainic MG, Yang M, Lin F, Medof ME, Heeger PS. Locally produced C5a binds to T cell-expressed C5aR to enhance effector T-cell expansion by limiting antigen-induced apoptosis. Blood. (2008) 112:1759–66. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-151068. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Li K, Anderson KJ, Peng Q, Noble A, Lu B, Kelly AP, et al. Cyclic AMP plays a critical role in C3a-receptor-mediated regulation of dendritic cells in antigen uptake and T-cell stimulation. Blood. (2008) 112:5084–94. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-156646. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Kastl SP, Speidl WS, Kaun C, Rega G, Assadian A, Weiss TW, et al. The complement component C5a induces the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in human macrophages via NF-kappaB activation. J Thromb Haemost. (2006) 4:1790–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02046.x. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Li K, Fazekasova H, Wang N, Peng Q, Sacks SH, Lombardi G, et al. Functional modulation of human monocytes derived DCs by anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a. Immunobiology. (2012) 217:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2011.07.033. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Asgari E, Le Friec G, Yamamoto H, Perucha E, Sacks SS, Köhl J, et al. C3a modulates IL-1β secretion in human monocytes by regulating ATP efflux and subsequent NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Blood. (2013) 122:3473–81. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-05-502229. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Hajishengallis G, Lambris JD. More than complementing Tolls: complement-Toll-like receptor synergy and crosstalk in innate immunity and inflammation. Immunol Rev. (2016) 274:233–44. doi: 10.1111/imr.12467. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hawlisch H, Belkaid Y, Baelder R, Hildeman D, Gerard C, Köhl J. C5a negatively regulates toll-like receptor 4-induced immune responses. Immunity. (2005) 22:415–26. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.02.006. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Lalli PN, Strainic MG, Lin F, Medof ME, Heeger PS. Decay accelerating factor can control T cell differentiation into IFN-gamma-producing effector cells via regulating local C5a-induced IL-12 production. J Immunol. (2007) 179:5793–802. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.9.5793. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Fang C, Miwa T, Song W-C. Decay-accelerating factor regulates T-cell immunity in the context of inflammation by influencing costimulatory molecule expression on antigen-presenting cells. Blood. (2011) 118:1008–14. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-348474. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Fang C, Zhang X, Miwa T, Song W-C. Complement promotes the development of inflammatory T-helper 17 cells through synergistic interaction with Toll-like receptor signaling and interleukin-6 production. Blood. (2009) 114:1005–15. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-198283. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Hashimoto M, Hirota K, Yoshitomi H, Maeda S, Teradaira S, Akizuki S, et al. Complement drives Th17 cell differentiation and triggers autoimmune arthritis. J Exp Med. (2010) 207:1135–43. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092301. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Zhang X, Kimura Y, Fang C, Zhou L, Sfyroera G, Lambris JD, et al. Regulation of Toll-like receptor-mediated inflammatory response by complement in vivo. Blood. (2007) 110:228–36. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-12-063636. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. la Sala A, Gadina M, Kelsall BL. G(i)-protein-dependent inhibition of IL-12 production is mediated by activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein 3 kinase B/Akt pathway and JNK. J Immunol. (2005) 175:2994–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.5.2994. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Peng Q, Li K, Wang N, Li Q, Asgari E, Lu B, et al. Dendritic cell function in allostimulation is modulated by C5aR signaling. J Immunol. (2009) 183:6058–68. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804186. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Braun MC, Lahey E, Kelsall BL. Selective suppression of IL-12 production by chemoattractants. J Immunol. (2000) 164:3009–17. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.6.3009. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Heeger PS, Lalli PN, Lin F, Valujskikh A, Liu J, Muqim N, et al. Decay-accelerating factor modulates induction of T cell immunity. J Exp Med. (2005) 201:1523–30. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041967. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Liu J, Miwa T, Hilliard B, Chen Y, Lambris JD, Wells AD, et al. The complement inhibitory protein DAF (CD55) suppresses T cell immunity in vivo. J Exp Med. (2005) 201:567–77. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040863. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Hasegawa M, Yada S, Liu MZ, Kamada N, Muñoz-Planillo R, Do N, et al. Interleukin-22 regulates the complement system to promote resistance against pathobionts after pathogen-induced intestinal damage. Immunity. (2014) 41:620–32. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.09.010. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Zou L, Feng Y, Li Y, Zhang M, Chen C, Cai J, et al. Complement factor B is the downstream effector of TLRs and plays an important role in a mouse model of severe sepsis. J Immunol. (2013) 191:5625–35. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301903. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Kim S, Elkon KB, Ma X. Transcriptional suppression of interleukin-12 gene expression following phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Immunity. (2004) 21:643–53. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.09.009. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Hajishengallis G, Lambris JD. Crosstalk pathways between Toll-like receptors and the complement system. Trends Immunol. (2010) 31:154–63. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2010.01.002. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Reed JH, Jain M, Lee K, Kandimalla ER, Faridi MH, Buyon JP, et al. Complement receptor 3 influences toll-like receptor 7/8-dependent inflammation: implications for autoimmune diseases characterized by antibody reactivity to ribonucleoproteins. J Biol Chem. (2013) 288:9077–83. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.403303. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Ling GS, Bennett J, Woollard KJ, Szajna M, Fossati-Jimack L, Taylor PR, et al. Integrin CD11b positively regulates TLR4-induced signalling pathways in dendritic cells but not in macrophages. Nat Commun. (2014) 5:3039. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4039. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Benoit ME, Clarke EV, Morgado P, Fraser DA, Tenner AJ. Complement protein C1q directs macrophage polarization and limits inflammasome activity during the uptake of apoptotic cells. J Immunol. (2012) 188:5682–93. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103760. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Clarke EV, Weist BM, Walsh CM, Tenner AJ. Complement protein C1q bound to apoptotic cells suppresses human macrophage and dendritic cell-mediated Th17 and Th1 T cell subset proliferation. J Leukoc Biol. (2015) 97:147–60. doi: 10.1189/jlb.3A0614-278R. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Csomor E, Bajtay Z, Sándor N, Kristóf K, Arlaud GJ, Thiel S, et al. Complement protein C1q induces maturation of human dendritic cells. Mol Immunol. (2007) 44:3389–97. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.02.014. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Liszewski MK, Kolev M, Le Friec G, Leung M, Bertram PG, Fara AF, et al. Intracellular complement activation sustains T cell homeostasis and mediates effector differentiation. Immunity. (2013) 39:1143–57. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.018. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Settembre C, Zoncu R, Medina DL, Vetrini F, Erdin S, Erdin S, et al. A lysosome-to-nucleus signalling mechanism senses and regulates the lysosome via mTOR and TFEB. EMBO J. (2012) 31:1095–108. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.32. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Strainic MG, Shevach EM, An F, Lin F, Medof ME. Absence of signaling into CD4+ cells via C3aR and C5aR enables autoinductive TGF-β1 signaling and induction of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. (2013) 14:162–71. doi: 10.1038/ni.2499. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Kwan W, van der Touw W, Paz-Artal E, Li MO, Heeger PS. Signaling through C5a receptor and C3a receptor diminishes function of murine natural regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. (2013) 210:257–68. doi: 10.1084/jem.20121525. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Cardone J, Le Friec G, Vantourout P, Roberts A, Fuchs A, Jackson I, et al. Complement regulator CD46 temporally regulates cytokine production by conventional and unconventional T cells. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:862–71. doi: 10.1038/ni.1917. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Sánchez A, Feito MJ, Rojo JM. CD46-mediated costimulation induces a Th1-biased response and enhances early TCR/CD3 signaling in human CD4+ T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. (2004) 34:2439–48. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324259. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kemper C, Chan AC, Green JM, Brett KA, Murphy KM, Atkinson JP. Activation of human CD4+ cells with CD3 and CD46 induces a T-regulatory cell 1 phenotype. Nature. (2003) 421:388–92. doi: 10.1038/nature01315. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Ni Choileain S, Hay J, Thomas J, Williams A, Vermeren MM, Benezech C, et al. TCR-stimulated changes in cell surface CD46 expression generate type 1 regulatory T cells. Sci Signal. (2017) 10:eaah6163. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aah6163. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Tsai Y-G, Niu D-M, Yang KD, Hung C-H, Yeh Y-J, Lee C-Y, et al. Functional defects of CD46-induced regulatory T cells to suppress airway inflammation in mite allergic asthma. Lab Invest. (2012) 92:1260–9. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.86. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Astier AL, Meiffren G, Freeman S, Hafler DA. Alterations in CD46-mediated Tr1 regulatory T cells in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest. (2006) 116:3252–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI29251. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Ni Choileain S, Weyand NJ, Neumann C, Thomas J, So M, Astier AL. The dynamic processing of CD46 intracellular domains provides a molecular rheostat for T cell activation. PloS One. (2011) 6:e16287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016287. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Arbore G, West EE, Spolski R, Robertson AAB, Klos A, Rheinheimer C, et al. T helper 1 immunity requires complement-driven NLRP3 inflammasome activity in CD4+ T cells. Science. (2016) 352:aad1210. doi: 10.1126/science.aad1210. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Le Friec G, Sheppard D, Whiteman P, Karsten CM, Shamoun S-T, Laing A, et al. The CD46-Jagged1 interaction is critical for human TH1 immunity. Nat Immunol. (2012) 13:1213–21. doi: 10.1038/ni.2454. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Amsen D, Antov A, Flavell RA. The different faces of Notch in T-helper-cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol. (2009) 9:116–24. doi: 10.1038/nri2488. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Kopan R, Ilagan MXG. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell. (2009) 137:216–33. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.045. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Li XX, Lee JD, Kemper C, Woodruff TM. The complement receptor C5aR2: A powerful modulator of innate and adaptive immunity. J Immunol. (2019) 202:3339–48. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900371. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Rahman J, Bibby JA, Singh P, Merle NS, West EE, Bohrer A, et al. A CD4+ T cell-intrinsic complement C5aR2-prostacyclin-IL-1R2 axis orchestrates Th1 cell contraction. Immunity. (2025) 58:1438–1455.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.05.003. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Dijkstra DJ, Joeloemsingh JV, Bajema IM, Trouw LA. Complement activation and regulation in rheumatic disease. Semin Immunol. (2019) 45:101339. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2019.101339. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Vasilev VV, Radanova M, Lazarov VJ, Dragon-Durey M-A, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Roumenina LT. Autoantibodies against C3b-functional consequences and disease relevance. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:64. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00064. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Magrini E, Di Marco S, Mapelli SN, Perucchini C, Pasqualini F, Donato A, et al. Complement activation promoted by the lectin pathway mediates C3aR-dependent sarcoma progression and immunosuppression. Nat Cancer. (2021) 2:218–32. doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00173-0. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Ricklin D, Reis ES, Lambris JD. Complement in disease: a defence system turning offensive. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2016) 12:383–401. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.70. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement in immune and inflammatory disorders: pathophysiological mechanisms. J Immunol. (2013) 190:3831–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203487. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Benis N, Wells JM, Smits MA, Kar SK, van der Hee B, dos Santos VAPM, et al. High-level integration of murine intestinal transcriptomics data highlights the importance of the complement system in mucosal homeostasis. BMC Genomics. (2019) 20:1028. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6390-x. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Odenwald MA, Turner JR. The intestinal epithelial barrier: a therapeutic target? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2017) 14:9–21. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.169. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Ning C, Li Y-Y, Wang Y, Han G-C, Wang R-X, Xiao H, et al. Complement activation promotes colitis-associated carcinogenesis through activating intestinal IL-1β/IL-17A axis. Mucosal Immunol. (2015) 8:1275–84. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.18. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Akhlaghpour M, Haritunians T, More SK, Thomas LS, Stamps DT, Dube S, et al. Genetic coding variant in complement factor B (CFB) is associated with increased risk for perianal crohn’s disease and leads to impaired CFB cleavage and phagocytosis. Gut. (2023) 72:2068–80. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329689. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Wu M, Zheng W, Song X, Bao B, Wang Y, Ramanan D, et al. Gut complement induced by the microbiota combats pathogens and spares commensals. Cell. (2024) 187:897–913.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.036. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Kim S-H, Jang Y-S. Yersinia enterocolitica exploits signal crosstalk between complement 5a receptor and toll-like receptor 1/2 and 4 to avoid the bacterial clearance in M cells. Immune Network. (2017) 17:228–36. doi: 10.4110/in.2017.17.4.228. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Kim S-H, Jung D-I, Yang I-Y, Kim J, Lee K-Y, Nochi T, et al. M cells expressing the complement C5a receptor are efficient targets for mucosal vaccine delivery. Eur J Immunol. (2011) 41:3219–29. doi: 10.1002/eji.201141592. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Kim S-H, Cho B-H, Kim KS, Jang Y-S. Complement C5a promotes antigen cross-presentation by Peyer’s patch monocyte-derived dendritic cells and drives a protective CD8+ T cell response. Cell Rep. (2021) 35:108995. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108995. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Kim S-H, Shim E-H, Kim D-J, Jang Y-S. C5aR+ dendritic cells fine-tune the Peyer’s patch microenvironment to induce antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. NPJ Vaccines. (2023) 8:120. doi: 10.1038/s41541-023-00720-z. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Ohno M, Hasegawa M, Hayashi A, Caballero-Flores G, Alteri CJ, Lawley TD, et al. Lipopolysaccharide O structure of adherent and invasive Escherichia coli regulates intestinal inflammation via complement C3. PloS Pathog. (2020) 16:e1008928. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008928. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Cardone J, Al-Shouli S, Kemper C. A novel role for CD46 in wound repair. Front Immunol. (2011) 2:28. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00028. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Matsumoto N, Satyam A, Geha M, Lapchak PH, Dalle Lucca JJ, Tsokos MG, et al. C3a enhances the formation of intestinal organoids through C3aR1. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1046. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01046. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Donaldson GP, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2016) 14:20–32. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3552. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Kirjavainen V, Jarva H, Biedzka-Sarek M, Blom AM, Skurnik M, Meri S. Yersinia enterocolitica serum resistance proteins YadA and ail bind the complement regulator C4b-binding protein. PloS Pathog. (2008) 4:e1000140. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000140. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Ho DK, Jarva H, Meri S. Human complement factor H binds to outer membrane protein Rck of Salmonella. J Immunol (Baltimore Md: 1950). (2010) 185:1763–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001244. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Ho DK, Tissari J, Järvinen HM, Blom AM, Meri S, Jarva H. Functional recruitment of human complement inhibitor C4B-binding protein to outer membrane protein Rck of Salmonella. PloS One. (2011) 6:e27546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027546. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Dehinwal R, Cooley D, Rakov AV, Alugupalli AS, Harmon J, Cunrath O, et al. Increased production of outer membrane vesicles by Salmonella interferes with complement-mediated innate immune attack. mBio. (2021) 12:e0086921. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00869-21. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Bee GCW, Lokken-Toyli KL, Yeung ST, Rodriguez L, Zangari T, Anderson EE, et al. Age-dependent differences in efferocytosis determine the outcome of opsonophagocytic protection from invasive pathogens. Immunity. (2023) 56:1255–1268.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.03.018. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Yuste J, Sen A, Truedsson L, Jönsson G, Tay L-S, Hyams C, et al. Impaired opsonization with C3b and phagocytosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae in sera from subjects with defects in the classical complement pathway. Infect Immun. (2008) 76:3761. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00291-08. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Lambris JD, Ricklin D, Geisbrecht BV. Complement evasion by human pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2008) 6:132. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1824. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Abreu AG, Fraga TR, Granados Martínez AP, Kondo MY, Juliano MA, Juliano L, et al. The serine protease Pic from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli mediates immune evasion by the direct cleavage of complement proteins. J Infect Dis. (2015) 212:106–15. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv013. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Ramu P, Tanskanen R, Holmberg M, Lähteenmäki K, Korhonen TK, Meri S. The surface protease PgtE of Salmonella enterica affects complement activity by proteolytically cleaving C3b, C4b and C5. FEBS Lett. (2007) 581:1716–20. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.03.049. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Correa GB, Freire CA, Dibo M, Huerta-Cantillo J, Navarro-Garcia F, Barbosa AS, et al. Plasmid-encoded toxin of Escherichia coli cleaves complement system proteins and inhibits complement-mediated lysis in vitro. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2024) 14:1327241. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1327241. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Sorbara MT, Foerster EG, Tsalikis J, Abdel-Nour M, Mangiapane J, Sirluck-Schroeder I, et al. Complement C3 drives autophagy-dependent restriction of cyto-invasive bacteria. Cell Host Microbe. (2018) 23:644–652.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.04.008. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Yang Y, Jobin C. Microbial imbalance and intestinal pathologies: connections and contributions. Dis Model Mech. (2014) 7:1131–42. doi: 10.1242/dmm.016428. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Tojo R, Suárez A, Clemente MG, de los Reyes-Gavilán CG, Margolles A, Gueimonde M, et al. Intestinal microbiota in health and disease: role of bifidobacteria in gut homeostasis. World J Gastroenterol. (2014) 20:15163–76. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15163. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Weingarden AR, Vaughn BP. Intestinal microbiota, fecal microbiota transplantation, and inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes. (2017) 8:238–52. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1290757. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Neurath MF. Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. (2014) 14:329–42. doi: 10.1038/nri3661. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Ostvik AE, Granlund AV, Gustafsson BI, Torp SH, Espevik T, Mollnes TE, et al. Mucosal toll-like receptor 3-dependent synthesis of complement factor B and systemic complement activation in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammation Bowel Dis. (2014) 20:995–1003. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000035. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Nissilä E, Korpela K, Lokki AI, Paakkanen R, Jokiranta S, de Vos WM, et al. C4B gene influences intestinal microbiota through complement activation in patients with paediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Exp Immunol. (2017) 190:394–405. doi: 10.1111/cei.13040. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Cleynen I, Konings P, Robberecht C, Laukens D, Amininejad L, Théâtre E, et al. Genome-wide copy number variation scan identifies complement component C4 as novel susceptibility gene for Crohn’s disease. Inflammation Bowel Dis. (2016) 22:505–15. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000623. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Berstad AE, Brandtzaeg P. Expression of cell membrane complement regulatory glycoproteins along the normal and diseased human gastrointestinal tract. Gut. (1998) 42:522–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.42.4.522. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Akhlaghpour M, Haritunians T, More SK, Thomas LS, Stamps DT, Dube S, et al. Genetic coding variant in complement factor B (CFB) is associated with increased risk for perianal Crohn’s disease and leads to impaired CFB cleavage and phagocytosis. Gut. (2023) 72:2068–2080. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329689. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Halstensen TS, Mollnes TE, Fausa O, Brandtzaeg P. Deposits of terminal complement complex (TCC) in muscularis mucosae and submucosal vessels in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease of the colon. Gut. (1989) 30:361–6. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.3.361. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Halstensen TS, Mollnes TE, Brandtzaeg P. Persistent complement activation in submucosal blood vessels of active inflammatory bowel disease: immunohistochemical evidence. Gastroenterology. (1989) 97:10–9. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)91409-1. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Veloso T. Complement deposits in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. (1990) 99:1541–2. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91209-o. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Sugihara T, Kobori A, Imaeda H, Tsujikawa T, Amagase K, Takeuchi K, et al. The increased mucosal mRNA expressions of complement C3 and interleukin-17 in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Exp Immunol. (2010) 160:386–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04093.x. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Sünderhauf A, Skibbe K, Preisker S, Ebbert K, Verschoor A, Karsten CM, et al. Regulation of epithelial cell expressed C3 in the intestine - relevance for the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease? Mol Immunol. (2017) 90:227–38. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.08.003. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Halstensen TS, Mollnes TE, Garred P, Fausa O, Brandtzaeg P. Epithelial deposition of immunoglobulin G1 and activated complement (C3b and terminal complement complex) in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. (1990) 98:1264–71. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90343-y. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Ebert EC, Geng X, Bajpai M, Pan Z, Tatar E, Das KM. Antibody to tropomyosin isoform 5 and complement induce the lysis of colonocytes in ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. (2009) 104:2996–3003. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.455. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Halstensen TS, Mollnes TE, Garred P, Fausa O, Brandtzaeg P. Surface epithelium related activation of complement differs in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Gut. (1992) 33:902–8. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.7.902. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Ostvik AE, Granlund AV, Gustafsson BI, Torp SH, Espevik T, Mollnes TE, et al. Mucosal toll-like receptor 3-dependent synthesis of complement factor B and systemic complement activation in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammation Bowel Dis. (2014) 20:995–1003. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000035. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Akhlaghpour M, Haritunians T, More SK, Thomas LS, Stamps DT, Dube S, et al. Genetic coding variant in complement factor B (CFB) is associated with increased risk for perianal crohn’s disease and leads to impaired CFB cleavage and phagocytosis. Gut. (2023) 72:2068–80. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329689. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Schepp-Berglind J, Atkinson C, Elvington M, Qiao F, Mannon P, Tomlinson S. Complement-dependent injury and protection in a murine model of acute DSS-induced colitis. J Immunol. (2012) 188:6309–18. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200553. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Lu F, Fernandes SM, Davis AE. The role of the complement and contact systems in the dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis model: the effect of C1 inhibitor in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. (2010) 298:G878–883. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00400.2009. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Wende E, Laudeley R, Bleich A, Bleich E, Wetsel RA, Glage S, et al. The complement anaphylatoxin C3a receptor (C3aR) contributes to the inflammatory response in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. PloS One. (2013) 8:e62257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062257. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Johswich K, Martin M, Bleich A, Kracht M, Dittrich-Breiholz O, Gessner JE, et al. Role of the C5a receptor (C5aR) in acute and chronic dextran sulfate-induced models of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammation Bowel Dis. (2009) 15:1812–23. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21012. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Jain U, Woodruff TM, Stadnyk AW. The C5a receptor antagonist PMX205 ameliorates experimentally induced colitis associated with increased IL-4 and IL-10. Br J Pharmacol. (2013) 168:488–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02183.x. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Elvington M, Schepp-Berglind J, Tomlinson S. Regulation of the alternative pathway of complement modulates injury and immunity in a chronic model of dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis. Clin Exp Immunol. (2015) 179:500–8. doi: 10.1111/cei.12464. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Zhang X, Chen Y, Yu S, Jin B, Liu W. Inhibition of C3a/C3aR axis in diverse stages of ulcerative colitis affected the prognosis of UC by modulating the pyroptosis and expression of caspase-11. Inflammation. (2020) 43:2128–36. doi: 10.1007/s10753-020-01280-3. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Quail D, Joyce J. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. (2013) 19:1423–37. doi: 10.1038/nm.3394. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Liu Q, Liao Q, Zhao Y. Chemotherapy and tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell Int. (2017) 17:68. doi: 10.1186/s12935-017-0437-3. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. de Visser KE, Joyce JA. The evolving tumor microenvironment: From cancer initiation to metastatic outgrowth. Cancer Cell. (2023) 41:374–403. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.016. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Nakamura K, Smyth MJ. Myeloid immunosuppression and immune checkpoints in the tumor microenvironment. Cell Mol Immunol. (2020) 17:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41423-019-0306-1. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Marciscano AE, Anandasabapathy N. The role of dendritic cells in cancer and anti-tumor immunity. Semin Immunol. (2021) 52:101481. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2021.101481. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Wu F, Yang J, Liu J, Wang Y, Mu J, Zeng Q, et al. Signaling pathways in cancer-associated fibroblasts and targeted therapy for cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2021) 6:218. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00641-0. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Shan F, Somasundaram A, Bruno TC, Workman CJ, Vignali DAA. Therapeutic targeting of regulatory T cells in cancer. Trends Cancer. (2022) 8:944–61. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.06.008. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Reis ES, Mastellos DC, Ricklin D, Mantovani A, Lambris JD. Complement in cancer: untangling an intricate relationship. Nat Rev Immunol. (2018) 18:5–18. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.97. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Afshar-Kharghan V. The role of the complement system in cancer. J Clin Invest. (2017) 127:780–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI90962. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Ajona D, Ortiz-Espinosa S, Pio R. Complement anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a: Emerging roles in cancer progression and treatment. Semin Cell Dev Biol. (2019) 85:153–63. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.023. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Habermann JK, Roblick UJ, Luke BT, Prieto DA, Finlay WJJ, Podust VN, et al. Increased serum levels of complement C3a anaphylatoxin indicate the presence of colorectal tumors. Gastroenterology. (2006) 131:1020–9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.07.011. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Bao D, Zhang C, Li L, Wang H, Li Q, Ni L, et al. Integrative analysis of complement system to prognosis and immune infiltrating in colon cancer and gastric cancer. Front Oncol. (2020) 10:553297. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.553297. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. O’Brien RM, Meltzer S, Buckley CE, Heeran AB, Nugent TS, Donlon NE, et al. Complement is increased in treatment resistant rectal cancer and modulates radioresistance. Cancer Lett. (2024) 604:217253. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217253. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. He X-S, Zou S-Y, Yao J-L, Yu W, Deng Z-Y, Wang J-R, et al. Transcriptomic analysis identifies complement component 3 as a potential predictive biomarker for chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer. Front Mol Biosci. (2021) 8:763652. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.763652. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Downs-Canner S, Magge D, Ravindranathan R, O’Malley ME, Francis L, Liu Z, et al. Complement inhibition: a novel form of immunotherapy for colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. (2016) 23:655–62. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4778-7. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Ning C, Li Y-Y, Wang Y, Han G-C, Wang R-X, Xiao H, et al. Complement activation promotes colitis-associated carcinogenesis through activating intestinal IL-1β/IL-17A axis. Mucosal Immunol. (2015) 8:1275–84. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.18. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Guglietta S, Chiavelli A, Zagato E, Krieg C, Gandini S, Ravenda PS, et al. Coagulation induced by C3aR-dependent NETosis drives protumorigenic neutrophils during small intestinal tumorigenesis. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:11037. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11037. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Krieg C, Weber LM, Fosso B, Marzano M, Hardiman G, Olcina MM, et al. Complement downregulation promotes an inflammatory signature that renders colorectal cancer susceptible to immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. (2022) 10:e004717. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-004717. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Zha H, Wang X, Zhu Y, Chen D, Han X, Yang F, et al. Intracellular activation of complement C3 leads to PD-L1 antibody treatment resistance by modulating tumor-associated macrophages. Cancer Immunol Res. (2019) 7:193–207. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0272. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Nandagopal S, Li CG, Xu Y, Sodji QH, Graves EE, Giaccia AJ. C3aR signaling inhibits NK-cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment in mouse models. Cancer Immunol Res. (2022) 10:245–58. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-21-0435. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Ding P, Li L, Li L, Lv X, Zhou D, Wang Q, et al. C5aR1 is a master regulator in colorectal tumorigenesis via immune modulation. Theranostics. (2020) 10:8619–32. doi: 10.7150/thno.45058. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Piao C, Zhang W-M, Li T-T, Zhang C-C, Qiu S, Liu Y, et al. Complement 5a stimulates macrophage polarization and contributes to tumor metastases of colon cancer. Exp Cell Res. (2018) 366:127–38. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.03.009. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Ding P, Xu Y, Li L, Lv X, Li L, Chen J, et al. Intracellular complement C5a/C5aR1 stabilizes β-catenin to promote colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell Rep. (2022) 39:110851. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110851. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Shang Y, Chai N, Gu Y, Ding L, Yang Y, Zhou J, et al. Systematic immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of CD46, CD55, and CD59 in colon cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2014) 138:910–9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0064-OA. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Tang G, Pan L, Wang Z, Zhu H, Yang Y, Wang Z, et al. Knockdown of membrane-bound complement regulatory proteins suppresses colon cancer growth in mice through inducing tumor cell apoptosis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 114:109450. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109450. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Durrant LG, Chapman MA, Buckley DJ, Spendlove I, Robins RA, Armitage NC. Enhanced expression of the complement regulatory protein CD55 predicts a poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer immunology immunotherapy: CII. (2003) 52:638–42. doi: 10.1007/s00262-003-0402-y. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Watson NFS, Durrant LG, Madjd Z, Ellis IO, Scholefield JH, Spendlove I. Expression of the membrane complement regulatory protein CD59 (protectin) is associated with reduced survival in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer immunology immunotherapy: CII. (2006) 55:973–80. doi: 10.1007/s00262-005-0055-0. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Olcina MM, Balanis NG, Kim RK, Aksoy BA, Kodysh J, Thompson MJ, et al. Mutations in an innate immunity pathway are associated with poor overall survival outcomes and hypoxic signaling in cancer. Cell Rep. (2018) 25:3721–3732.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.093. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Mamidi S, Cinci M, Hasmann M, Fehring V, Kirschfink M. Lipoplex mediated silencing of membrane regulators (CD46, CD55 and CD59) enhances complement‐dependent anti‐tumor activity of trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Mol Oncol. (2013) 7:580. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.02.011. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Lu Y, Zhao Q, Liao J-Y, Song E, Xia Q, Pan J, et al. Complement signals determine opposite effects of B cells in chemotherapy-induced immunity. Cell. (2020) 180:1081–1097.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.015. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





