Skip to main content
Emerging Microbes & Infections logoLink to Emerging Microbes & Infections
. 2026 May 13;15(1):2651464. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2026.2651464

A CRISPR activation screen identifies CH25H as a restriction factor against influenza viruses by targeting accessible cholesterol

Jinyu Huang a,b,c,d,e, Kaixiong Ma e, Shiping Ding a,b,c, Yunmeng Wang f, Junlong Xiong a,b,c, Jiahui Yi a,b,c, Jiahao Zhang a,b,c, Zhuoliang He e, Lihong Huang a,b,c,d, Xingxing Ren g, Jiangtao Zhou a,b,c, Xiaona Chen a,b,c, Lele Liu a,b,c, Wenbao Qi a,b,c,d,CONTACT, Shaobo Wang e,f,, Ming Liao a,b,c,d,h,
PMCID: PMC13215439  PMID: 42126187

ABSTRACT

Influenza A viruses (IAVs) cause severe outbreaks with high mortality in birds and humans. A deeper understanding of cell-intrinsic defense mechanisms against influenza viruses is therefore crucial for developing novel antiviral strategies. Herein, we perform a genome-wide CRISPR activation screen to systematically elucidate host restriction factors against influenza A (H7N9) virus. Among multiple candidates, cholesterol 25-hydroxylase (CH25H) is shown to be induced by influenza virus infection and inhibit viral membrane fusion. Notably, our previous work demonstrated that CH25H blocks the entry of plasma membrane-fusing viruses such as coronaviruses. This inhibition occurs by relocating accessible cholesterol from the plasma membrane (PM) to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Here, we extend this finding and show that the same mechanism works against endocytosis-dependent viruses such as influenza viruses. The exogenous supplementation of cholesterol can restore depleted accessible cholesterol and reverse the CH25H-mediated restriction. Additionally, we prove that acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) is required to recruit the accessible cholesterol in this process. However, how hydrophobic accessible cholesterol is transported remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that GRAMD1/Aster-mediated non-vesicular cholesterol transport is utilized to mobilize accessible cholesterol upon stimulation of CH25H. 25-hydroxycholesterol (25HC), the catalytic product of CH25H, is a natural metabolite that potently inhibits influenza virus infection both in vitro and in vivo. These findings underscore the promising therapeutic potential of 25HC against influenza viruses.

KEYWORDS: CH25H, influenza virus, host restriction factor, CRISPR activation screen, viral membrane fusion

Introduction

Influenza A viruses (IAVs) undergo frequent genetic recombination and antigenic drift in both wildlife and domestic animals, resulting in widespread seasonal and annual outbreaks across the globe [1]. Since 2016, China has reported five successive waves of human infections with highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, with a case-fatality rate as high as approximately 40% [2]. Mandatory vaccination has effectively curtailed the transmission of H7N9. However, its persistent circulation in poultry and evolutionary potential necessitate ongoing surveillance. H7N9 continues to pose a pandemic risk and therefore warrants sustained monitoring. Currently, high-throughput influenza virus screens predominantly use gene loss-of-function methods to define host factors essential for infection [3]. In recent years, some host factors with anti-influenza virus activity have also been identified, most notably interferon-stimulated genes such as IFITM3, BTN3A3, and MX1 [4–6]. The CRISPR synergistic activation mediator (CRISPR SAM) is designed to recruit transcriptional activators. This system provides a highly effective platform for genome-wide gain-of-function screens, complementing standard loss-of-function studies [7]. Significantly, the low overlap rate of common hits across diverse high-throughput screens indicates that many antiviral genes may still be undiscovered. This underscores the critical need for further research to deepen our understanding of host antiviral mechanisms. Notably, there is a lack of systematic screening studies focused on restriction factors against highly pathogenic H7 subtype influenza viruses.

In this study, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR activation screening with a human origin of H7N9 influenza virus. CH25H is an interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) known to restrict a broad range of viral infections [8]. CH25H catalyzes the conversion of cholesterol to 25HC, an oxysterol with broad antiviral activity [9,10]. However, it has been reported that CH25H knockout effectively protects mice against the H1N1 challenge. Interestingly, we previously reported that CH25H blocks plasma membrane-fusing viruses like coronaviruses by moving accessible cholesterol from the PM to the ER [11]. In contrast, influenza virus is a classic endocytosis-dependent virus. Therefore, the exact association between CH25H and influenza virus has not been fully elucidated to date.

Here, we showed that CH25H inhibits viral membrane fusion to restrict entry of endocytosis-dependent viruses, including influenza virus. We also demonstrated that acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) is required for recruiting accessible cholesterol in this process. Additionally, we have refined our model to show that 25HC exploits GRAMD1/Aster proteins for non-vesicular cholesterol transport. By mobilizing accessible cholesterol through this pathway, 25HC effectively inhibits viral membrane fusion. Furthermore, we demonstrated the in vivo antiviral efficacy of 25HC against H7N9 using a mouse model. These findings highlight the potential of 25HC and its underlying mechanism for future therapeutic development.

Material and methods

Cells

Human lung adenocarcinoma cells (A549, ATCC, #CVCL_0023), human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293 T, ATCC, #CVCL_0063), Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (MDCK, ATCC, #CVCL_0460), human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Huh7, ATCC, #CVCL_0336), African green monkey kidney cells (Vero, ATCC, #CVCL_0574), and immortalized murine bone marrow-derived macrophage (iBMDM, ATCC, #CVCL_M688) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, #11965092). Mouse alveolar macrophage cells (MHS, ATCC, #CVCL_2744) were grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI 1640, Gibco, #11875093). All cells were grown in medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (v/v, FBS, ExCell Bio, #FSP500) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. To establish CH25H-deficient A549 cells, sgRNAs in Table S1 were inserted into the lentiGuide-Puro backbone. The efficiency of CH25H knockout was confirmed by western blot using anti-CH25H antibody (Bioss, #bs-6480R). For generation of A549 cell lines stably overexpressing CH25H, the encoding region of CH25H was amplified into Myc tag lentiviral expression vector (pCDH) and confirmed with anti-Myc antibody (Proteintech, #16286). Stable cell lines were generated through puromycin selection.

Viruses

The influenza virus strains used were H1N1 (A/Puerto Rico/8/1934), H3N2 (A/Hong Kong/1/1968), H3N8 (A/Henan/4-10/2022), H5N6 (A/Duck/Sicuan/21957-1/2021), H7N9 (A/Guangdong/Th008/2017), and H9N2 (A/Chicken/Guangdong/V/2008). Viruses were grown in 9–11 d-old chicken embryos, then titrated by TCID50 assay on MDCK cells [12]. ZIKV was produced in Vero cells, and supernatant was harvested after 48 h. Viral titer was assessed using plaque assay on Vero cells. The experiments with H1N1, H3N2, H3N8, and H9N2 were done in a BSL-2 lab, but those involving H5N6 and H7N9 were performed in a BSL-3 lab.

Plasmids

Plasmids encoding HA of strains A/Puerto Rico/8/1934, A/Duck/Sicuan/21957-1/2021, A/Guangdong/Th008/2017, and A/Chicken/Guangdong/V/2008, as well as NA of strain A/Guangdong/Th008/2017, were constructed previously. This RNA was reverse transcribed, followed by the amplification of viral genomes with universal primers as described by Hoffmann [13]. CH25H sequence was amplified by CH25H gene-specific primers (Fw: 5’-ATGAGCTGCCACAACTGCTC-3’, Rv: 5’-TGCATCTGTCCCAGCGCGGTGA-3’) from cDNA of A549 cells and cloned into the Myc-tag pCAGGS expression vector.

A549-CRISPR activation library preparation and screening with H7N9

The A549-CRISPR activation library cells were generated using three vector lentiviral CRISPR SAM systems [14]. Briefly, 8 × 108 A549-dCas9 polyclonal cell lines were infected with lentivirus containing a CRISPR activation library at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.3, covered at 1000-fold. Next, the A549-CRISPR activation library was then challenged with H7N9 (MOI = 2), until all negative control cells died after infection. After enrichment, the second infection screen was continued and repeated once. Three independent genome-wide screens were performed. In survival and control cells, sgRNAs were tagged with barcodes, and subjected to deep sequencing (Novogene Co., Ltd.). NGS enrichment data were analyzed using the MAGeCK algorithm. The fold enrichment of individual sgRNAs was quantified through a direct comparison of their read frequencies in experimental versus control samples.

Functional and signaling pathway enrichment analyses based on Gene Ontology (GO) terms were performed using the Metascape online platform. Functional enrichment analysis was performed by mapping enriched genes to the GO database, followed by identification of significantly enriched GO terms with P < 0.05.

Validation of the candidate genes

Full-length cDNAs of the candidate genes were PCR-amplified from HEK-293 T total RNA-derived cDNA and subcloned into a Myc-tagged pCAGGS vector. HEK-293 T cells transfected with empty vector (EV)-Myc or candidate genes were infected with H7N9 for 1 h at MOI = 1; then, cell lysates were harvested at 12 h p.i. to assess mRNA expression of AIV-NP.

siRNAs directed against the candidate genes, along with non-targeting control siRNAs (siNC), were obtained from Ribo Bio (Guangzhou, China). HEK-293 T cells were transfected with 50 nM siRNAs using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, #13778075) following the manufacturer’s protocol. For each target gene, a mixture of three independent siRNAs was utilized. Following 48 h of incubation, the cells were inoculated with H7N9 influenza virus at an MOI of 1. Cellular samples were collected at 12 h p.i. for the analysis of AIV-NP mRNA expression.

Virus infection

Cells were infected with H1N1, H3N2, H3N8, H5N6, H7N9, or H9N2 with different MOIs for 1 h [15]. After removing viruses, cells were maintained in maintenance medium (DMEM, 0.2% BSA). The cells were collected for TCID50 or immunofluorescence.

Lung organoid infection

Human iPSC-derived lung organoids were produced following previously reported methods [16,17]. Human lung organoids were infected with viruses at MOI = 2. Upon removal from the viral inoculum, encapsulate the cells in Matrigel and maintain them in CKDCI medium. Cell lysates were collected at 24 h p.i. to assess mRNA expression of CH25H.

Multi-omics in situ pairwise sequencing (MiP-seq)

4–6 week-old female BALB/c mice were intranasally infected with 106 TCID50 in 40 μL of H7N9. Lungs were harvested for the analysis of MiP-seq at 4 d p.i. Mouse lungs were dissected and fixed in 4% PFA, then stored in 30% sucrose in PBS for cryopreservation. Subsequently, MiP-seq probe design and in situ RNA MiP-seq were kindly completed by Gang Cao (State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University) [18].

Immunofluorescence

Cells were fixed with 4% PFA and then incubated with PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and 5% BSA for blocking. Antibody staining was performed using anti-M1 antibody (ATCC, #M2-1C6-4R3), followed by incubation with anti-mouse IgG 488 AlexaFluor (Invitrogen, #A56869). Nuclear staining was achieved using DAPI (Beyotime Biotech, #C1005).

RNA isolation and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated using the RNAfast200 kit (Shanghai Feijie, #220011). The cDNA was generated using a reverse transcription kit (TaKaRa, #2641A) with random primers for influenza virus NP or M1 mRNA (5’-AGCAAAAGCAGG-3’) and with specific primers for influenza virus NP vRNA (5’-GGCCGTCATGGTGGCGAATGAATGACAATGGACGGAAAACAAG GATTGC-3’). Quantitative RT–PCR was conducted with the ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, #Q711) with one cycle at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 30 s, on the Applied Biosystems 7500 qPCR cycler. Primers used in qRT-PCR were listed in Table S2.

CH25H knockdown rescue assays

A549 cells were transduced with siCH25H (Table S3) for 48 h, then treated with medium containing DMSO or 20 μM 25HC (MedChemExpress, #HY-113134) for 12 h. Cells were infected with H7N9 influenza virus, followed by cell lysis and qPCR analysis after 12 h.

In vivo virus infection

BALB/c female mice aged 4–6 weeks were intraperitoneally injected with 25HC (30 mg/kg) or DMSO vehicle. After 12 h, they were intranasally infected with H7N9 virus (A/Guangdong/Th008/2017) titrated to 10⁶ TCID50 [19]. Daily treatment continued for 7 days. Body weight and survival rate were monitored daily after infection. Animals were sacrificed if their body weight fell below 75% of baseline, adhering to ethical animal welfare standards. Serum was collected from seven randomized mice in each group on the day before infection and on day 2 after infection. Lungs were harvested for the analysis of the viral titer, mRNA abundance, immunohistochemistry and H&E staining at 4 d p.i.

Measurement of total cholesterol concentration

Total cholesterol was assessed via a COP-PAP based enzymatic assay (Solarbio, #BC1985). Serum or standard samples (10 μL) were reacted with 90 μL of assay reagent for 30 min at 37°C. Measure the absorbance at 500 nm [20].

Binding and internalization assay

For virus binding, A549 cells transfected with EV-Myc or CH25H-Myc were infected with H7N9 (MOI = 10) for 1 h at 4°C. Unattached virus was removed by washing with cold PBS. The virus binding was determined by measuring vRNA level by qRT-PCR [21]. Following viral attachment at 4°C for 1 h, cells were shifted to 37°C for an additional 1 h to permit viral entry. The unattached and noninternalized viruses were removed by incubation with 0.25% trypsin at 4°C for 15 min. The virus internalization was determined by measuring vRNA level by qRT-PCR.

Acid-bypass assay

A549 cells were treated with 20 μM 25HC or DMSO for 12 h. Then cells were infected with H7N9 (MOI = 10) for 1 h at 4°C. After viral attachment, cells were washed with cold PBS, and exposed for 2 min at 37°C to either an acidic fusion buffer (50 mM citrate, 154 mM NaCl, pH 5.0) or a neutral control buffer (20 mM HEPES, 154 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). Virus stop solution (50 mM HEPES, 20 mM NH4Cl, pH 7.4) was subsequently applied, and cells were maintained at 37°C for 6 h. Viral fusion efficiency was determined by quantifying viral mRNA levels using qPCR [22].

Pseudovirus production and infection

HEK 293 T cells were transfected with pCAGGS-HA, pCAGGS-NA, pSPAX, and pWXLD-Luc, and then harvested 60 h [23,24]. After pseudovirus incubation for 2 h, cells were lysed with lysis buffer to measure the relative luminescence units (RLU) of Fluc activity using the Luciferase Assay Kit (YEASEN, #11401ES80).

Influenza viral polymerase activity assay

HEK 293 T cells were initially transfected with EV-Myc or CH25H-Myc for 12 h, followed by co-transfection with PB2, PB1, PA, NP, the firefly luciferase reporter (pPolI-NP-Luc), and a Renilla luciferase control. Luciferase signals were quantified by a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, #E1910) [15].

Cell–cell fusion assay

A549 cells were co-transfected with EGFP and HA, and subsequently exposed to DMSO or 25HC (20 μM). Cells were then treated with either an acidic fusion buffer (50 mM HEPES, 154 mM NaCl, pH 5.0) or a neutral control buffer (50 mM HEPES, 154 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) at 37°C for 5 min [25]. For H1N1-HA and H9N2-HA mediated cell–cell fusion assays, cells were additionally incubated with TPCK-trypsin (2 μg/mL) for 20 min [26]. Cells were allowed to recover in complete medium for 15 min, followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde. Membrane fusion was quantified by measuring the mean area of fluorescent puncta from 20 randomly selected fields per group using ImageJ.

ALOD4 protein purification, labeling, and incubation

ALOD4-His (Addgene, #111026) was affinity-purified using a Capturem His-tag kit (Beyotime Biotech, #P2226) [27]. For ALOD4 binding assay, cells pretreated with DMSO, 25HC, or HP-β-CD (2%, TargetMol, #T19609) were incubated with 4 μM ALOD4 at 37°C for 30 min.

Cholesterol and K-604 dihydrochloride rescue assays

A549 cells treated with DMSO or 20 μM 25HC for 12 h were subjected to cholesterol replenishment using PBS or 40 μM water-soluble cholesterol for 30 min, followed by exposure to H7N9 pseudovirus or ZIKV for 2 h [11]. In the K-604 dihydrochloride rescue experiment, A549 cells subjected to 25HC treatment with DMSO or 20 μM K-604 dihydrochloride (TargetMol, #T11733) for 12 h were washed and maintained with DMSO or K-604 dihydrochloride for an additional 4 h before exposure to H7N9 pseudovirus. Then, the cells were analysed for luciferase activity.

GRAMD1A/B (Aster-A/B) knockdown rescue assays

A549 cells were transduced with siAster-A/B (Table S3) for 48 h, then pretreated with DMSO or 5 μM 25HC for 8 h. Aster-A/B knockdown cells were infected with H7N9 and quantified by qPCR measurement at 6 h p.i. Aster-A/B knockdown cells were co-transfected with pCAGGS expressing EGFP and HA for 24 h , and treated with DMSO or 20 μM 25HC for 12 h. Then cells were incubated in fusion buffer to observe syncytium formation.

Cell viability assay

Cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of 25HC, K-604 dihydrochloride, or U18666A. Evaluate cell viability using the Cell Counting Kit-8 after 48 h (Beyotime Biotech, #C0043).

Ethics statement

Experiments involving animals were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of South China Agricultural University and handled according to the applicable guidelines (2017A002).

Statistical analysis

All datasets were processed and visualized with Prism version 8.0.2 (GraphPad). Differences between groups were assessed by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t tests, while survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier approach. P values < 0.05 are considered significant and denoted as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. Nonsignificant values are denoted as ns.

Results

Genome-wide CRISPR activation screening revealed host factors limiting H7N9 infection

As previously detailed, a gain-of-function library was used to produce an A549 cell pool for identifying genes involved in H7N9 infection and replication [7] (Figure 1A). Briefly, A549-dCas9 cells were transduced with a human CRISPR activation lentiviral library (70,290 sgRNAs) at an MOI of 0.3 [28]. Cells were challenged with H7N9 (MOI = 2). Surviving cells from both the infected and mock control groups were harvested and expanded for sgRNA sequencing. The enrichment of target genes was determined by comparing sgRNA reads from resistant cells (infection group) to those from uninfected cells. We observed robust enrichment of approximately 957 sgRNAs in the A549 activation library cells (P < 0.05) (Figure 1B, Dataset S1). Previous studies have reported that B4GALNT2 exhibits broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against influenza virus infection [7,29]. Notably, B4GALNT2 was also identified as a top candidate in our functional screening, which further underscores the reliability and robustness of our screening system.

Figure 1.

Eight diagrams and charts showing CRISPR activation screening in A549 cells, enriched genes, CH25H expression, and influenza virus data. The figure shows eight visuals summarizing a CRISPR activation screen of influenza virus infection in A549 cells. The first visual is a workflow diagram with dCas9 activation machinery, a CRISPR activation library labeled 70290 single guide RNAs at a multiplicity of infection of 0.3, exposure to H7N9 influenza virus at a multiplicity of infection of 2 for 3 rounds, and surviving living cells proceeding to enrichment analysis and deep sequencing. The second visual is a scatter plot of gene level enrichment in A549 cells, with the vertical axis labeled MAGeCK score as log base 2 fold change and the horizontal axis showing genes; B4GALNT2 and other highlighted genes appear above a cloud of gray points. The third visual is a dot chart listing enriched Gene Ontology terms such as interleukin 23 signaling pathway, cellular response to interferon alpha, Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway, and regulation of protein phosphorylation along the vertical axis, with the horizontal axis labeled negative log base 10 P value and dots increasing from left to right. The fourth and fifth visuals are bar charts showing relative messenger RNA level of influenza nucleoprotein in HEK 293T cells with overexpression or knockdown of candidate genes; the vertical axes are labeled relative messenger RNA level of nucleoprotein, and each bar has an error bar. The sixth visual is a bar chart of fold change of CH25H messenger RNA with A549 cells, MH S cells, immortalized bone marrow derived macrophages, and human lung organoids after H7N9 infection compared with mock, with the vertical axis labeled fold change of CH25H messenger RNA and several asterisk rows above groups. The seventh visual is a series of microscopy images labeled mock or IAV, with separate channels for Ifit2 and Ch25h plus merged views, showing more punctate signal in infected lung tissue; insets on the right provide higher magnification. The eighth visual is a bar chart of fold change of CH25H messenger RNA in A549 cells infected with influenza subtypes H1N1, H3N2, H3N8, and H9N2 at multiplicity of infection 2, harvested at 12 hours post infection, with the vertical axis labeled fold change of CH25H messenger RNA and horizontal brackets with asterisks indicating comparisons. All data are approximate.

CRISPR activation screen identified host restriction factors for involved in influenza virus infection in A549 cells. (A) Schematic of CRISPRa library construction in A549 cells and screening strategy for influenza virus infection. (B) Gene enrichment analysis in A549 cells transduced with the CRISPRa library after H7N9 infection. (C) Gene Ontology functional analysis of highly enriched genes (P < 0.05). (D–E) H7N9 infection in HEK 293 T cells overexpressing (D) or with knockdown of (E) candidate genes. (F) H7N9 infection led to upregulation of CH25H in human cells, mouse cells and human lung organoids. (G) Spatial multi-omics profiling of H7N9-infected mouse lungs by in situ pairwise sequencing. Blue, Ch25 h. Yellow, Ifit2. (H) A549 cells were infected with different subtypes of influenza viruses at MOI of 2. Cells were subsequently harvested at 12 h p.i. to measure viral M1 mRNA expression levels by qRT-PCR. Mean ± SD of n = 3. ****P < 0.0001, by Student’s t-test.

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the candidates revealed 957 genes (P < 0.05) enriched in specific biological processes (Figure 1C). Enrichment was observed among genes linked to inflammatory signaling pathways and the type I interferon pathway. Furthermore, genes involved in lipid glycosylation and protein phosphorylation were also enriched. According to the gene list enriched from our CRISPR activation screen, we selected 20 candidate genes for further functional validation by combining their enrichment rankings and our previous research background (Figure 1D,E). As presented in Figure 1D,E, overexpression of CH25H markedly inhibited influenza virus replication, whereas knockdown of CH25H enhanced viral replication. In our previous study, CH25H blocked SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV membrane fusion via 25HC-mediated cholesterol mobilization from the PM. Notably, influenza virus is a classic endocytosis-dependent virus, which is distinct from these plasma membrane-fusing viruses. Accordingly, dissecting the antiviral mechanism of CH25H will deepen our understanding of whether antiviral targets against viral membrane fusion are broad-spectrum and reliable [30–32].

Here we analyzed the data from H7N9 infection in A549 cells, human lung organoids, and two mouse cell lines (MH-S and iBMDM). CH25H expression was significantly upregulated upon H7N9 influenza virus infection (Figure 1F). Similar results were observed in MiP-seq spatial transcriptomics of infected mouse lungs. We measured spatial RNA expression of Ch25 h and Ifit2 genes at the in situ level. Influenza virus infection significantly upregulated the transcriptional levels of Ifit2, a well-characterized host restriction factor against influenza, as well as those of the Ch25 h gene in mouse lungs [33] (Figure 1G). Furthermore, infection with multiple influenza A viruses (H1N1, H3N2, H3N8, and H9N2) resulted in a robust induction of endogenous CH25H transcription (Figure 1H). Collectively, we conducted a comprehensive genome-wide gain-of-function screen targeting highly pathogenic influenza H7N9 virus and further validated multiple candidates as restriction factors. Notably, CH25H exhibited significant potential and was induced by H7N9 infection.

CH25H acted as a restriction factor against influenza virus infection

CH25H is a critical mediator of cholesterol metabolism with important roles in cellular homeostasis and immune regulation. Our recent work has also elucidated a novel antiviral mechanism of CH25H against plasma membrane-fused viruses such as coronaviruses [11]; however, it remains to be determined whether this mechanism is also effective against endocytosis-dependent viruses like influenza virus. Thus, exploring the mechanism of CH25H will clarify whether antiviral targets against viral membrane fusion are broad-spectrum and reliable.

To investigate the role of CH25H in influenza virus infection, we established a stable CH25H-expressing A549 cell line (Figure S1A). Subsequently, viral titers were measured in CH25H-expressing and wild-type (WT) A549 cells following H7N9 influenza virus infection (Figure 2A). The results showed that CH25H expression markedly inhibited viral infection. Consistent with this observation, overexpression of CH25H-Myc (Figure S1B) resulted in a significant reduction in viral mRNA (Figure 2B) and protein (Figure 2C). Conversely, depletion of CH25H led to a marked elevation in viral titers (Figure 2D, S1C). Also, siRNA-mediated knockdown of CH25H (Figure S1D) led to increased viral infection (Figure 1E,F).

Figure 2.

Four line graphs, six bar charts, four western blot images, one chemical structure diagram, and one immunofluorescence image showing CH25H and 25HC effects on influenza virus growth over time and dose ranges. The figure shows sixteen visuals summarizing experiments on CH25H and 25 hydroxycholesterol in A549 cells infected with influenza viruses. The top row contains two line graphs of virus titer over time in wild type and CH25H expressing A549 cells, followed by a clustered bar chart of relative nucleoprotein messenger RNA levels and a western blot image labeled with CH25H, nucleoprotein, and glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase at 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours after infection. The second row starts with another line graph comparing wild type and CH25H knockout A549 virus titers, a bar chart of nucleoprotein and matrix messenger RNA after CH25H small interfering RNA, and a western blot of nucleoprotein after mock, control small interfering RNA, or CH25H small interfering RNA. The next visual is a chemical structure diagram showing cholesterol converted by CH25H to 25 hydroxycholesterol. To the right are a bar chart and a western blot depicting nucleoprotein messenger RNA and protein after dimethyl sulfoxide or 25 hydroxycholesterol treatment at multiple time points. The bottom section includes a line graph and western blot for nucleoprotein and matrix messenger RNA across a 25 hydroxycholesterol concentration range, a bar chart and blot showing effects of CH25H knockdown with or without 25 hydroxycholesterol, and an immunofluorescence image series plus bar chart quantifying area of matrix protein positive dots for H1N1, H5N6, H7N9, and H9N2 viruses with dimethyl sulfoxide or 25 hydroxycholesterol. All data are approximate.

Identification of CH25H as a host antiviral factor against influenza viruses. (A) Multicycle replication of H7N9 influenza virus in A549 cells or cell lines stably expressing CH25H (MOI = 0.1). Viral titers were measured by TCID50 assay at 48 h p.i. (B–C) A549 cells were transfected with CH25H-Myc plasmids or empty vector control for 24 h and infected with H7N9 influenza virus at MOI = 1. The relative level of NP RNA was detected by qPCR (B). NP proteins were detected by western blot (C). (D) Viral titers were measured by TCID50 assay in WT and CH25H-deficient A549 cells at 48 h p.i. (E–F) A549 cells were transfected with CH25H-targeting siRNA or negative control (NC) siRNA for 48 h. Then cells were infected with H7N9 influenza virus at MOI = 1. NP and M1 were measured by qPCR (E) and western blot (F). (G) Catalytic reaction scheme of CH25H and 25HC. (H–I) Cells were exposed to DMSO or 25HC (10 μM) for 12 h before being infected with H7N9 influenza virus at MOI = 1. NP RNA (H) and NP protein (I) was analyzed. (J–K) A549 cells were treated with DMSO or 25HC, and then challenged with H7N9 influenza virus at MOI = 1, NP RNA (J) and protein (K) were quantified after 12 h. (L) A549 cells were treated with 20 μM 25HC for 0, 3, 6, 12, and 18 h prior to H7N9 infection (MOI = 0.3). Cells were subsequently harvested at 12 h p.i. to measure viral NP mRNA expression levels by qRT-PCR. (M) A549 cells transfected with CH25H or control siRNA were treated with 20 μM 25HC for 12 h prior to infection with H7N9 influenza virus. (N) A549 cells were challenged with H1N1, H5N6, H7N9 and H9N2 influenza viruses at MOI = 0.3 for 6 h after treatment with 25HC. M1 proteins (green) were probed by immunofluorescence. Scale bars, 200 μm. Fluorescence dots inhibition was analyzed by high-content cell imaging system. Inhibition efficiency =   100(totalfluorescentdotsin25HCtotalfluorescentdotsinDMSO)100. Mean ± SD of n =   3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, nsP > 0.05, by Student’s t-test.

CH25H catalyzes the conversion of cholesterol to 25-hydroxycholesterol (25HC) (Figure 2G) [34]. To investigate whether CH25H inhibited H7N9 infection via 25HC production, A549 cells were treated with 25HC at a non-cytotoxic concentration (CC50 = 147.1 μM) (Figure S1E). As expected, both viral RNA transcription (Figure 2H) and protein expression (Figure 2I) were significantly reduced. 25HC treatment suppressed H7N9 infection with a degree of dose-dependent efficacy (Figure 2J,K). A time-course experiment for 25HC pretreatment demonstrated that, compared to the 0-hour control, the viral inhibition rates for the 3, 6, 12, and 18-hour pretreatment groups were 35.8%, 53.9%, 85.1%, and 89.4%, respectively (Figure 2L). To confirm that CH25H exerted its antiviral effect through 25HC, we examined H7N9 infection in CH25H-knockdown A549 cells treated with either DMSO or 25HC. CH25H knockdown significantly enhanced viral genome transcription, whereas 25HC supplementation effectively diminished this enhancement (Figure 2M). Consistent with these findings, viral protein levels also exhibited a similar trend.

We further investigated the effect of 25HC on inhibiting other influenza virus subtypes. The green fluorescence signal was significantly diminished for each influenza virus following 25HC treatment (Figure 2N). Quantitative analysis using a high-content imaging system revealed that 25HC reduced infections by 68.96%, 72.24%, 80.61%, and 75.89% for H1N1, H5N6, H7N9, and H9N2, respectively. In brief, our findings demonstrated that CH25H broadly restricts influenza A virus infection through the production of 25HC.

25HC inhibited influenza virus replication in vivo

25HC is a natural metabolite produced by the immune system. Importantly, its effects are transient and fully reversible upon removal, which contributes to its favorable safety profile in both murine and non-human primate models [32,35]. To evaluate the antiviral efficacy of 25HC, we conducted experiments using a murine influenza virus infection model. Female mice (4-6 weeks old) were administered 25HC (30 mg/kg) or vehicle via intraperitoneal injection and subsequently challenged with 106 TCID50 of H7N9 influenza virus through intranasal inoculation [36]. Daily monitoring of survival and body weight was performed over a 14-day period (Figure 3A). The 25HC-treated group showed a significantly higher survival rate (∼66.67%) compared to the vehicle-treated group (Figure 3B). In both uninfected groups, the mice exhibited a slight increase in body weight over time. Conversely, infected mice in the untreated group underwent a ∼30% reduction in body weight. Notably, the body weight of infected mice in the 25HC-treated group initially declined but showed a marked recovery by day 11 post-infection (Figure 3C).

Figure 3.

Eight visuals: one experimental timeline diagram, three line graphs, three bar charts, and one set of lung tissue microscopy images. The figure shows eight visuals summarizing 25 hydroxycholesterol treatment in a murine H7N9 influenza model. A timeline diagram outlines intraperitoneal 25 hydroxycholesterol or vehicle injections, intranasal H7N9 challenge, and serum and lung collection up to day 14. A Kaplan Meier survival curve plots days post infection on the horizontal axis from 0 to 14 and survival percent on the vertical axis from 0 to 120 with 20 unit ticks, comparing vehicle and 25 hydroxycholesterol groups with or without H7N9. A line graph of body weight shows days post infection on the horizontal axis and body weight percent on the vertical axis from 60 to 120 with 10 unit ticks; infected and treated mice lose weight then partially recover, while uninfected mice slowly gain weight. A bar chart of lung index expresses lung weight to body weight percent for 4 groups; infected treated mice display lower bars than infected untreated mice. A second bar chart shows lung virus titers in log tissue culture infectious dose per milliliter, with lower titers in 25 hydroxycholesterol treated mice. A grid of hematoxylin and eosin stained lung sections presents low and high magnification views for the 4 groups, with infected untreated lungs appearing more densely consolidated. An adjacent grid of immunohistochemistry anti nucleoprotein stains shows stronger staining in infected untreated lungs and weaker staining in treated lungs. A final bar chart depicts serum total cholesterol on day 1 and day 2 for each group with similar scatter around each bar. All data are approximate.

25HC suppressed H7N9 infection in a murine model. (A) Experimental schematic of 25HC administration and influenza virus infection in mice. (B) Survival rates of H7N9 infection with 25HC treatment in mice (n = 6, with a log-rank test [Mantel-Cox], representative of 6 mice). (C) Body weight changes of H7N9 infection with 25HC treatment in mice (n = 6, representative of 6 mice). (D) Lung indices in mouse lungs at 4 d p.i. were calculated as lung wet weight/body weight*100 (n = 4, representative of 4 mice). (E) Virus titers in lungs of mice at 4 d p.i. were determined by TCID50 assay (n = 4, representative of 4 mice). (F) H&E staining of lung tissues from mice at 4 d p.i. Scale bars, 1000 and 200 μm. (G) IHC staining (anti-NP) of lung tissues from mice at 4 d p.i. Scale bars, 1000 and 200 μm. (H) Total cholesterol levels in mouse serum at day-1 and day 2. Mean ± SD of n = 7.

Viral titers and lung index from each group on day 4 post-infection indicated that 25HC treatment significantly reduced viral load and alleviated weight loss in lungs (Figure 3D,E). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining revealed decreased inflammatory infiltration in the lungs of 25HC-treated mice (Figure 3F), accompanied by lower expression levels of several innate immune factors compared to the untreated group, such as IFN-β, TNF-α, IL-6 and MX1 (Figure S2A, S2B, S2C and S2D). These findings suggested that 25HC treatment mitigated inflammatory damage. Additionally, immunohistochemistry showed a marked reduction in viral distribution in the lungs of 25HC-treated mice (Figure 3G).

25HC has been shown to modulate cholesterol metabolism. To assess its potential toxicity in mice, we measured serum cholesterol levels in mice receiving daily intraperitoneal injections of 25HC. High-dose 25HC treatment did not significantly affect serum cholesterol levels (Figure 3H). These findings indicated that daily high-dose administration of 25HC caused no obvious adverse effects or significant alterations of serum cholesterol levels. Overall, 25HC effectively inhibited viral replication without evident toxicity in vivo.

25HC broadly inhibited influenza virus entry by blocking HA-mediated membrane fusion

To investigate how CH25H restricts H7N9 infection, firstly we evaluated whether CH25H regulates influenza virus entry using a pseudovirus system. We confirmed that hemagglutinin (HA) was successfully incorporated into the surface of HIV-based pseudoviral particles encoding luciferase (Figure S3A, S3B) [37]. 25HC treatment significantly reduced pseudovirus entry (Figure 4A). Following viral entry, virions are transported to the cytoplasm, where vRNPs subsequently enter the nucleus to initiate viral replication. Using a mini-replicon assay, we found that CH25H did not affect viral genome amplification (Figure 4B).

Figure 4.

Eight visuals: 4 bar charts, 2 process diagrams and 2 fluorescence microscopy image sets comparing DMSO and 25HC effects on influenza. The figure shows eight visuals examining how 25 hydroxycholesterol and CH25H affect influenza hemagglutinin related steps. A first bar chart labeled Pseudovirus shows relative light units on the y axis from 0 to about 4000 in 1000 unit steps and four groups on the x axis: virus with dimethyl sulfoxide only gives a high bar, while conditions without pseudovirus or with 25 hydroxycholesterol show bars near baseline. All data are approximate. A second bar chart shows relative polymerase activity on the y axis from 0 to about 120 with two x axis groups labeled empty vector and CH25H; both bars are similar height, suggesting similar activity. All data are approximate. A schematic diagram labeled Binding and Internalization outlines virus attachment at the plasma membrane, movement into an endosome, and sequential removal of unbound and unadsorbed virions. A third bar chart shows relative viral ribonucleic acid of nucleoprotein on the y axis for binding and internalization steps comparing empty vector and CH25H; the bars appear similar. All data are approximate. A second schematic diagram labeled Fusion and Infection illustrates an acid bypass protocol with pH 7 buffer, pH 5 fusion buffer, ammonium chloride stop buffer, and separate binding, fusion, and infection stages. A fourth bar chart shows relative viral ribonucleic acid of nucleoprotein with buffer at pH 7 or pH 5 in dimethyl sulfoxide or 25 hydroxycholesterol; the dimethyl sulfoxide pH 5 bar is high whereas other bars are low. All data are approximate. A fluorescence microscopy image set compares dimethyl sulfoxide and 25 hydroxycholesterol treated A549 cells at pH 7 or pH 5, with green syncytia appearing largest in dimethyl sulfoxide at pH 5; an adjacent scatter plot style summary chart plots mean fluorescent area for the four conditions with many individual points. A final fluorescence microscopy image set shows A549 cells expressing H1N1, H5N6, or H9N2 hemagglutinin treated with dimethyl sulfoxide or 25 hydroxycholesterol and exposed to low pH, with larger fluorescent clusters in dimethyl sulfoxide rows; a corresponding summary chart on the right plots mean fluorescent area for each hemagglutinin subtype under the two treatments. All data are approximate.

25HC broadly inhibited HA-mediated membrane fusion of influenza viruses. (A) A549 cells were treated with DMSO or 25HC, then challenged with H7N9 influenza virus pseudovirus. (B) 293 T cells received CH25H-Myc or vector control together with RNP, NP-Luc, and RL-TK plasmids. Luciferase activity was measured 24 h post-transfection. (C) A flowchart of the binding and internalization assay. (D) For binding assay, A549 cells were transfected with CH25H-Myc plasmids and infected with H7N9 influenza virus (MOI = 10) at 4°C. For internalization assay, cells were maintained at 37°C for 1 h after viral binding. The relative level of vRNA was quantified by qPCR. (E) A flowchart of the acid-bypass assay. (F) After viral binding to 25HC treated A549 cells at 4°C, cells were exposed to either pH = 5.0 or pH = 7.0 at 37°C, then replaced in stop medium. The relative level of vRNA was quantified by qPCR. Mean ± SD of n = 3. (G) 24 h after co-transfection of H7N9-HA and EGFP plasmids in A549 cells, cells were treated with DMSO or 25HC for 12 h, followed by pH = 5.0 or pH = 7.0 treatment for 5 min. The formation of syncytium was observed using fluorescence microscopy. Mean ± SD of n = 20. (H) A549 cells were co-transfected with the indicated HA subtypes and EGFP plasmids. At 24 h post-transfection, the cells were subjected to DMSO or 25HC treatment for 12 h, and were incubated with TPCK-trypsin, followed by exposure to pH = 5.0. Mean ± SD of n = 20. Scale bars, 200 μm. ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, nsP > 0.05, by Student’s t-test.

Then we investigated whether viral binding to the cell surface was inhibited. Wild-type (WT) and CH25H-expressing A549 cells were incubated with H7N9 influenza virus at 4°C for 1 h, followed by viral RNA quantification to detect surface-bound virus (Figure 4C). Our results indicated that CH25H exerted no effect on viral binding (Figure 4D). Next, we performed a viral internalization assay. No obvious difference in viral internalization was observed between CH25H-expressing and WT A549 cells.

After viral attachment and internalization, influenza virus is trafficked to the acidified endosomes, where low pH triggers the fusion between the viral and endosomal membrane, and releases vRNPs into the cytoplasm [38]. To investigate the role of 25HC during endosomal fusion, we employed an acid-bypass assay, which allows viral fusion exclusively at the PM by applying exogenous low pH stimulus, while canonical endosomal fusion is blocked by subsequent treatment with NH4Cl (Figure 4E) [39]. The results demonstrated that treatment with 25HC significantly inhibited viral fusion under low pH conditions, indicating that 25HC targets the viral-host membrane fusion process (Figure 4F).

The effect of 25HC on viral membrane fusion was further validated using a cell–cell fusion assay in A549 cells (Figure S3C) [40]. While DMSO-treated cells formed multinucleated syncytia, syncytium formation was remarkably inhibited in the 25HC-treated group (Figure 4G). Given the broad-spectrum antiviral activity of 25HC, we hypothesized that it inhibits HA-mediated fusion across multiple influenza subtypes. Indeed, 25HC effectively reduced HA-mediated syncytium formation for H1N1, H5N6, and H9N2 (Figure 4H). These results suggested that 25HC blocks viral entry by preventing HA-mediated membrane fusion, independent of viral attachment and endosomal internalization.

25HC blocked HA-mediated membrane fusion through mobilizing accessible cholesterol by activating ACAT

Accessible cholesterol in the PM is critical for maintaining cholesterol homeostasis [41]. 25HC rapidly depletes accessible cholesterol from the cell membrane, acting as a host defense mechanism against bacterial infections [42] and viral pathogens [31].

We hypothesized that 25HC inhibits influenza virus entry by depleting accessible cholesterol from the PM (Figure 5A). The accessible cholesterol can be specifically monitored by domain 4 of anthrolysin O (ALOD4) [41], and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) serving as a positive control [43]. Our results showed that 25HC nearly completely depleted accessible cholesterol from the PM (Figure 5B). The addition of external cholesterol reversed the inhibitory effect of 25HC on influenza pseudovirus entry (Figure 5C,D) and preserved hemagglutinin (HA)-mediated membrane fusion (Figure 5E). Interestingly, the result of another endocytosis-dependent enveloped virus, ZIKA, was similar to that of influenza virus (Figure 5F). These findings provide solid evidence that 25HC inhibits viral membrane fusion by depleting membrane accessible cholesterol.

Figure 5.

Ten visuals: two schematic diagrams, three western blot images, two bar charts, two cell microscopy photos, and one dot plot. The figure shows ten visuals labeled A to J that compare effects of 25HC, cholesterol, HP beta CD, and ACAT inhibitor K 604 on accessible cholesterol and viral entry. A is a schematic diagram of a plasma membrane separating cytoplasm and extracellular space with cartoon 25HC molecules causing loss of accessible cholesterol, and added cholesterol restoring it. B and C are western blot images with lanes labeled for 25HC, HP beta CD, cholesterol, and ALOD4, with upper bands for His tagged ALOD4 and lower bands for Actin loading control; ALOD4 signal decreases when 25HC is present and increases with cholesterol or HP beta CD. D is a bar chart with relative light unit on the y axis and 4 conditions on the x axis showing highest influenza pseudovirus entry without 25HC and lower values when 25HC is present; asterisks mark comparisons. E and J each combine a grid of fluorescence microscopy photos of A549 cells with green dots plus a right side dot plot of mean fluorescent dot area; rows compare DMSO, 25HC, K 604, and cholesterol treatments. F and I are bar charts with messenger RNA level or relative light unit on the y axis and 4 treatment groups on the x axis, showing reduced values when 25HC is added and partial restoration with cholesterol or K 604. G is a second schematic diagram showing 25HC, lipid droplets, accessible cholesterol, ACAT at the endoplasmic reticulum, and inhibition by K 604. H is another western blot image showing ALOD4 and Actin bands across 4 treatment lanes plus numbers under bands. All data are approximate.

25HC blocked viral fusion through accessible cholesterol by activating ACAT. (A) 25HC induces the depletion of accessible cholesterol on the PM. (B) A549 cells were treated with DMSO, 25HC or HP-β-CD and subsequently incubated with ALOD4. The quantities of bound ALOD4 were measured by western blot. (C–D) A549 cells were exposed to DMSO or 25HC, then treated with PBS or cholesterol. ALOD4 were measured by western blot (C). Detection of H7N9 influenza virus pseudovirus (D). Mean ± SD of n = 3. (E) A549 cells were co-transfected with H7N9-HA and EGFP plasmids, then were subjected to DMSO or 25HC treatment. After cholesterol incubation, then stimulated at pH = 5. Mean ± SD of n = 20. (F) Huh7 cells were pretreated with DMSO or 25HC, then incubated with PBS or cholesterol to infection with ZIKA. Mean ± SD of n = 3. (G) Inhibition of cholesterol transport by the ACAT inhibitor K-604 dihydrochloride. (H–I) A549 cells were treated with DMSO or 25HC in the presence of DMSO or K-604 dihydrochloride, then incubated with DMSO or K-604 dihydrochloride. Cells were then subjected to incubation with ALOD4 (H). Cells were infected with H7N9 influenza virus pseudovirus (I). Mean ± SD of n = 3. (J) A549 cells were treated with DMSO or 25HC in the presence of DMSO or K-604 dihydrochloride, followed by stimulated at pH = 5. Mean ± SD of n = 20. Scale bars, 200 μm. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, by Student’s t-test.

We next investigated the mechanism through which 25HC facilitates accessible cholesterol transport. Previous studies demonstrated that the rapid depletion of accessible cholesterol from the PM by 25HC is primarily driven by activating ACAT (Figure 5G) [11,44]. Our results indicated that inhibition of ACAT reversed the 25HC-induced reduction in accessible cholesterol (Figure 5H, S4A), infection by influenza pseudovirus (Figure 5I) and HA-mediated syncytium formation (Figure 5J). Collectively, our findings suggested that ACAT activation by 25HC mobilizes accessible cholesterol from the PM, thereby limiting influenza virus entry.

25HC modulated cholesterol transport through GRAMD1/Aster-mediated non-vesicular pathway

A critical gap remains in our understanding of how accessible cholesterol is transported. Retrograde cholesterol transport from the PM to the ER is mediated by non-vesicular mechanisms involving transporter proteins such as Aster-A/B/C in mammals [45,46]. We next aimed to investigate how cholesterol mobilized from the PM is transported to the ER. We performed ALOD4 binding assays using a cholesterol transport inhibitor U18666A (3-β-[2-(diethylamino) ethoxy] androst-5-en-17-one), which interferes with cholesterol trafficking by targeting the structural domain of Aster proteins [47] (Figure S5A). Co-treatment with 25HC and U18666A resulted in a significant increase in accessible cholesterol at the PM (Figure 6A). Additionally, syncytium formation was markedly restored in U18666A-treated cells (Figure 6B).

Figure 6.

Six visuals with two western blots, two fluorescence microscopy image sets, and two bar charts showing effects of 25HC and Aster on cells. The figure shows six visuals summarizing how 25 hydroxycholesterol and Aster affect cholesterol related readouts and viral ribonucleic acid levels. The first visual is a western blot showing His tagged ALOD4 and Actin bands in A549 cells treated with dimethyl sulfoxide, 25 hydroxycholesterol, U18666A, or the combination. Four lanes are arranged left to right under treatment labels, with His intensity values written below each lane and Actin used as a loading control. The second visual contains four fluorescence microscopy fields of A549 cells stained for ALOD4 binding, arranged in a 2 by 2 grid labeled dimethyl sulfoxide or 25 hydroxycholesterol across the top and dimethyl sulfoxide or U18666A along the side. To the right is a scatter plot with the x axis showing the four treatment combinations and the y axis labeled mean area of fluorescent dots as percent of dimethyl sulfoxide dimethyl sulfoxide from 0 to 300 with error bars. The third visual is a western blot of His tagged ALOD4 and Actin after small interfering ribonucleic acid knockdown using negative control or Aster targeting small interfering ribonucleic acid and treatment with or without 25 hydroxycholesterol. The fourth visual repeats the 2 by 2 fluorescence layout for small interfering negative control or small interfering Aster and dimethyl sulfoxide or 25 hydroxycholesterol, with a similar scatter plot on the right. The fifth visual is a grouped bar chart showing relative nucleoprotein ribonucleic acid levels from H7N9 influenza virus in cells treated with dimethyl sulfoxide or 25 hydroxycholesterol and transfected with small interfering negative control or small interfering Aster, with three replicate points over each bar and error bars. All data are approximate.

25HC modulated accessible cholesterol by Aster-mediated non-vesicular transport. (A–B) A549 cells received DMSO or 25HC together with DMSO or U18666A before being exposed to ALOD4 (A). After incubation in pH = 5, syncytium formation was observed (B). Mean ± SD of n = 20. (C–D) CH25H-knockdown cells were treated with 25HC. Analysis of ALOD4 bound (C) and syncytia formation (D). Mean ± SD of n = 20. (E) Cells were transfected with siRNA, then after treatment with DMSO or 25HC infected with H7N9 influenza virus to quantify NP RNA. Mean ± SD of n = 3. Scale bars, 200 μm. *P < 0.05 ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, by Student’s t-test.

Recently, Aster proteins are recruited to the ER, functioning to regulate cholesterol transport between the PM and the ER via non-vesicular pathways [48,49]. We observed that 25HC-induced depletion of accessible cholesterol was partially restored in Aster-deficient cells (Figure 6C, S5B), and HA-mediated membrane fusion was also rescued (Figure 6D). To verify the critical role of Aster in 25HC-mediated inhibition, we demonstrated that H7N9 replication was reduced to 36.39% following 25HC treatment in wild-type A549 cells, whereas viral replication was restored to 73.34% in Aster-deficient A549 cells (Figure 6E). These findings indicated that the ability of 25HC to deplete accessible cholesterol and block influenza virus membrane fusion is partially dependent on Aster-facilitated non-vesicular cholesterol transport.

Discussion

Elucidating the mechanisms of cell-intrinsic defenses can facilitate the development of innovative antiviral strategies for therapeutic purposes. Our objective is to systematically identify host-restricting factors targeting highly pathogenic H7N9 influenza virus using a genome-wide CRISPR activation screen. We showed that CH25H expression is upregulated upon influenza virus infection and limits viral propagation by blocking membrane fusion. The catalytic product of CH25H, 25HC, is a small molecule and natural compound that has demonstrated significant anti-influenza activity both in vitro and in vivo, indicating its potential for further therapeutic development. Furthermore, we refined this model and demonstrated that 25HC produced by CH25H restricts influenza virus infection through a sequential mechanism: (1) CH25H hydroxylates cholesterol to generate 25HC; (2) 25HC activates ACAT to deplete ER cholesterol, triggering the compensatory recruitment of accessible cholesterol from the PM; (3) Accessible cholesterol is transported from the PM to the ER via the Aster-mediated non-vesicular transport, causing a decrease in PM accessible cholesterol levels; (4) The resulting decrease in PM cholesterol subsequently depletes cholesterol in PM-derived endosomes, thereby restricting viral membrane fusion (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

An illustration showing influenza A virus entry and fusion blocked by CH25H, alongside 25HC driven cholesterol mobilization between membranes. The figure shows a schematic illustration of influenza A virus entry and intracellular cholesterol redistribution involving cholesterol 25 hydroxylase and 25 hydroxycholesterol. On the left, an influenza A virus particle labeled IAV attaches to and invaginates into the plasma membrane, then moves downward in a sequence labeled Entry. Below, a subsequent stage labeled Fusion depicts merging of the viral envelope with a host membrane, with viral genetic material released, and a horizontal inhibitory bar labeled CH25H placed just before this fusion step. A small boxed key indicates stylized molecules for 25 hydroxycholesterol and accessible cholesterol. On the right, a separate diagram labeled Mobilization of accessible cholesterol from PM by 25HC shows a plasma membrane at the top containing accessible cholesterol icons. Below, an endoplasmic reticulum like membrane network is shown. An enzyme labeled CH25H sits on this membrane, converting cholesterol into 25 hydroxycholesterol, which is drawn moving toward a structure labeled ACAT. A large vertical arrow labeled ACAT activation points upward toward the plasma membrane, and spherical structures labeled Lipid droplets emerge near ACAT. To the side, kidney shaped elements labeled Aster are depicted between the plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum along a vertical arrow labeled Cholesterol transport, indicating stepwise movement of accessible cholesterol away from the plasma membrane.

A hypothetical model for how CH25H and the product 25HC blocked viral membrane fusion by mobilizing accessible cholesterol.

Genome-wide gain-of-function screen using CRISPR activation is a powerful tool to uncover restriction factors against multiple viruses. We performed this screen to identify potential factors restricting H7N9. Our findings revealed several previously unreported influenza-associated host restriction factors, including Rab3A and FBXL14. Rab is a key regulator of endocytosis and intracellular membrane transport and belongs to the Ras GTPases superfamily [50]. The FBXL family, serving as receptors for E3 ubiquitin ligases, may exert antiviral activity via the ubiquitin-proteasome system [51].

CH25H exhibits antiviral activity through multiple mechanisms: (1) its natural product, 25HC, interferes with virus-host membrane fusion; (2) CH25H reprograms cholesterol metabolism and inhibits viral replication through diverse mechanisms; (3) CH25H modulates the innate immune response, including enhancing IFN production [8,9,30,52,53]. Although multiple studies have confirmed that CH25H inhibits the entry of various viruses such as HIV, VSV, ZIKV and SARS-CoV, the underlying mechanism of the interaction between CH25H and influenza virus remains poorly defined. Gold et al. demonstrated CH25H’s dual role as an in vitro antiviral factor and an in vivo proinflammatory mediator that aggravates influenza-associated pathology in mice [9]. Herein, we elucidate the anti-influenza mechanisms of CH25H and confirm that its metabolite 25HC harbors in vivo antiviral activity in murine influenza infection models. The in vivo antiviral activity of 25HC is presumably underpinned by its intrinsic cholesterol-regulatory properties. Our current study confirms that 25HC blocks endocytosis-dependent influenza viruses by decreasing the accessible cholesterol. Serving as a vital structural and signaling molecule, PM cholesterol modulates membrane rigidity, fluidity, and curvature. Since endosomes derive their membranes from the PM, the depletion of PM accessible cholesterol inevitably leads to a corresponding reduction in endosomal cholesterol. Altered biophysical properties of the endosomal membrane compromise the conformational changes of viral fusion proteins and the ensuing lipid mixing. Both steps are fundamental prerequisites for successful fusion inside acidified endosomes. This hypothesis is further supported by our functional rescue experiments, where exogenous supplementation of cholesterol and inhibition of ACAT could reverse the phenotype induced by 25HC. Collectively, these findings suggest that 25HC could be utilized for the development of broad-spectrum therapeutic agents. We also found that 25HC induces the expression of ISGs such as MX1. Viral activation of IFN signaling induces CH25H expression, and 25HC forms a positive feedback loop that enhances IFN signaling and STAT1/2 nuclear translocation, thereby upregulating MX1 and amplifying the antiviral cascade.

Cholesterol is esterified by ER-localized ACAT into cholesteryl esters, which regulates intracellular cholesterol levels [54]. However, the mechanism by which 25HC mobilizes cholesterol transport remains poorly understood. Retrograde transport of intracellular cholesterol from the plasma membrane is primarily mediated by non-vesicular proteins [55]. In mammals, elevated cholesterol levels recruit GRAMD1A/B/C proteins to ER-PM junctions, facilitating the transfer of HDL cholesterol [56]. In this study, 25HC regulates viral membrane fusion by disrupting Aster-mediated non-vesicular transport. We hypothesize that there are still undiscovered cholesterol transport mechanisms involved in various steps of viral infection.

Previously, 25HC inhibited ZIKV infections in both non-human primate and murine models, confirming its safety at effective doses [32]. The excellent safety profile of 25HC can be attributed to its unique antiviral mechanism. Accessible cholesterol constitutes only 1-10% of total cholesterol, and depleting this fraction does not cause significant toxicity to host cells [57]. Moreover, this depletion is transient and reversible once 25HC undergoes metabolic degradation. In addition to 25HC, other oxysterols such as 27HC and 24HC have been shown to inhibit HIV and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) in vitro [58–60]. Therefore, it is feasible to identify new derivatives of 25HC that exhibit enhanced antiviral activity and improved pharmacokinetics. Moreover, 25HC acts as a pro-inflammatory oxysterol that can amplify innate immune signaling during systemic administration, potentially increasing cytokine production and inflammatory responses. Therefore, careful dose optimization and targeted delivery strategies may be required to minimize inflammation-associated side effects. Given that 25HC targets the viral entry step, a process for which few FDA-approved drugs are currently available, combining it with virus-targeting therapies could potentially enhance existing clinical antiviral treatments.

Supplementary Material

Dataset S1.pdf
TEMI_A_2651464_SM5520.pdf (350.4KB, pdf)
Clean SI for review.docx

Funding Statement

This project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82472247, 32302956, 82302520 and 32461120064), the Specific University Discipline Construction Project (Grant2023B10564003), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023A1515110946), the Major Project of Guangzhou National Laboratory (SRPG22-002 and GZNL2024A01008), and the Pearl River Talent Recruitment Program (2023QN10Y308).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

Source data in CRISPR Activation screening are available in the Supplementary Dataset. Complementary data related to the conclusions of this study are available from the corresponding author.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2026.2651464.

References

  • 1.Uyeki TM, Hui DS, Zambon M, et al. Influenza. Lancet. 2022;400(10353):693–706. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00982-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Qi W, Shi W, Li W, et al. Continuous reassortments with local chicken H9N2 virus underlie the human-infecting influenza A (H7N9) virus in the new influenza season, Guangdong, China. Protein Cell. 2014;5(11):878–882. doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0084-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li B, Clohisey SM, Chia BS, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies host dependency factors for influenza A virus infection. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):164–181. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13965-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Everitt AR, Clare S, Pertel T, et al. IFITM3 restricts the morbidity and mortality associated with influenza. Nature. 2012;484(7395):519–523. doi: 10.1038/nature10921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pillai PS, Molony RD, Martinod K, et al. Mx1 reveals innate pathways to antiviral resistance and lethal influenza disease. Science. 2016;352(6284):463–466. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pinto RM, Bakshi S, Lytras S, et al. BTN3A3 evasion promotes the zoonotic potential of influenza A viruses. Nature. 2023;619(7969):338–347. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06261-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heaton BE, Kennedy EM, Dumm RE, et al. A CRISPR activation screen identifies a Pan-avian influenza virus inhibitory host factor. Cell Rep. 2017;20(7):1503–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu SY, Aliyari R, Chikere K, et al. Interferon-inducible cholesterol-25-hydroxylase broadly inhibits viral entry by production of 25-hydroxycholesterol. Immunity. 2013;38(1):92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gold ES, Diercks AH, Podolsky I, et al. 25-Hydroxycholesterol acts as an amplifier of inflammatory signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(29):10666–10671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404271111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dang Y, Wang Y, Wei J, et al. 25-Hydroxycholesterol inhibits hantavirus infection by reprogramming cholesterol metabolism. Free Radic Biol Med. 2024;224:232–245. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.08.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang S, Li W, Hui H, et al. Cholesterol 25-hydroxylase inhibits SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses by depleting membrane cholesterol. EMBO J. 2020;39(21):e106057. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020106057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li X, Qi W, He J, et al. Molecular basis of efficient replication and pathogenicity of H9N2 avian influenza viruses in mice. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e40118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hoffmann E, Stech J, Guan Y, et al. Universal primer set for the full-length amplification of all influenza A viruses. Arch Virol. 2001;146(12):2275–2289. doi: 10.1007/s007050170002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Konermann S, Brigham MD, Trevino AE, et al. Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex. Nature. 2015;517(7536):583–588. doi: 10.1038/nature14136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang J, Ma K, Li B, et al. A risk marker of tribasic hemagglutinin cleavage site in influenza A (H9N2) virus. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):71–83. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01589-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou J, Li C, Sachs N, et al. Differentiated human airway organoids to assess infectivity of emerging influenza virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(26):6822–6827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806308115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Salahudeen AA, Choi SS, Rustagi A, et al. Progenitor identification and SARS-CoV-2 infection in human distal lung organoids. Nature. 2020;588(7839):670–675. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-3014-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wu X, Xu W, Deng L, et al. Spatial multi-omics at subcellular resolution via high-throughput in situ pairwise sequencing. Nat Biomed Eng. 2024;8(7):872–889. doi: 10.1038/s41551-024-01205-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Qi W, Jia W, Liu D, et al. Emergence and adaptation of a novel highly pathogenic H7N9 influenza virus in birds and humans from a 2013 human-infecting low-pathogenic ancestor. J Virol. 2018;92(2):e00921–17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00921-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu T, Ma F, Ma X, et al. Regulating innate and adaptive immunity for controlling SIV infection by 25-hydroxycholesterol. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2686. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun X, Zeng H, Kumar A, et al. Constitutively expressed IFITM3 protein in human endothelial cells poses an early infection block to human influenza viruses. J Virol. 2016;90(24):11157–11167. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01254-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stauffer S, Feng Y, Nebioglu F, et al. Stepwise priming by acidic pH and a high K+concentration Is required for efficient uncoating of influenza A virus cores after penetration. J Virol. 2014;88(22):13029–13046. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01430-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang Y, Zhou Z, Wu X, et al. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1407:1–27. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-0113-5_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alvarado-Facundo E, Gao Y, Ribas-Aparicio RM, et al. Influenza virus M2 protein ion channel activity helps to maintain pandemic 2009 H1N1 virus hemagglutinin fusion competence during transport to the cell surface. J Virol. 2015;89(4):1975–1985. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03253-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yu S, Zheng X, Zhou B, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike engagement of ACE2 primes S2′ site cleavage and fusion initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(1):e2111199119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111199119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Karakus U, Sempere Borau M, Martinez-Barragan P, et al. MHC class II proteins mediate sialic acid independent entry of human and avian H2N2 influenza A viruses. Nat Microbiol. 2024;9(10):2626–2641. doi: 10.1038/s41564-024-01771-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Endapally S, Infante RE, Radhakrishnan A.. Methods in molecular biology. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1949:153–163. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9136-5_12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Joung J, Konermann S, Gootenberg JS, et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening. Nat Protoc. 2017;12(4):828–863. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen N, Zhang B, Deng L, et al. Virus-host interaction networks as new antiviral drug targets for IAV and SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022;11(1):1371–1389. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2071175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Blanc M, Hsieh WY, Robertson KA, et al. The transcription factor STAT-1 couples macrophage synthesis of 25-hydroxycholesterol to the interferon antiviral response. Immunity. 2013;38(1):106–118. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zang R, Case JB, Yutuc E, et al. Cholesterol 25-hydroxylase suppresses SARS-CoV-2 replication by blocking membrane fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(50):32105–32113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012197117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li C, Deng YQ, Wang S, et al. 25-Hydroxycholesterol protects host against Zika virus infection and its associated microcephaly in a mouse model. Immunity. 2017;46(3):446–456. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.02.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tran V, Ledwith MP, Thamamongood T, et al. Influenza virus repurposes the antiviral protein IFIT2 to promote translation of viral mRNAs. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(12):1490–1503. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0778-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lund EG, Kerr TA, Sakai J, et al. cDNA cloning of mouse and human cholesterol 25-hydroxylases, polytopic membrane proteins that synthesize a potent oxysterol regulator of lipid metabolism. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(51):34316–34327. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.51.34316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zu S, Deng YQ, Zhou C, et al. 25-Hydroxycholesterol is a potent SARS-CoV-2 inhibitor. Cell Res. 2020;30(11):1043–1045. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-00398-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fessler MB, Madenspacher JH, Baker PJ, et al. Endogenous and therapeutic 25-hydroxycholesterols may worsen early SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2023;69(6):638–648. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2023-0007OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Benton DJ, Gamblin SJ, Rosenthal PB, et al. Structural transitions in influenza haemagglutinin at membrane fusion pH. Nature. 2020;583(7814):150–153. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2333-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Te Velthuis AJ, Fodor E.. Influenza virus RNA polymerase: insights into the mechanisms of viral RNA synthesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(8):479–493. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Larson GP, Tran V, Yu S, et al. EPS8 facilitates uncoating of influenza A virus. Cell Rep. 2019;29(8):2175–2183.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Singanayagam A, Zambon M, Barclay WS.. Influenza virus with increased pH of hemagglutinin activation has improved replication in cell culture but at the cost of infectivity in human airway epithelium. J Virol. 2019;93(17):e00058–19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00058-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Das A, Brown MS, Anderson DD, et al. Three pools of plasma membrane cholesterol and their relation to cholesterol homeostasis. Elife. 2014;3:e02882; doi: 10.7554/eLife.02882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abrams ME, Johnson KA, Perelman SS, et al. Oxysterols provide innate immunity to bacterial infection by mobilizing cell surface accessible cholesterol. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(7):929–942. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0701-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ohtani Y, Irie T, Uekama K, et al. Differential effects of α-, β- and γ-cyclodextrins on human erythrocytes. Eur J Biochem. 1989;186(1-2):17–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15171.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Heisler DB, Johnson KA, Ma DH, et al. A concerted mechanism involving ACAT and SREBPs by which oxysterols deplete accessible cholesterol to restrict microbial infection. Elife. 2023;12:e83534. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sandhu J, Li S, Fairall L, et al. Aster proteins facilitate nonvesicular plasma membrane to ER cholesterol transport in mammalian cells. Cell. 2018;175(2):514–529.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bandara S, Ramkumar S, Imanishi S, et al. Aster proteins mediate carotenoid transport in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(15):e2200068119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200068119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xiao X, Kim Y, Romartinez-Alonso B, et al. Selective aster inhibitors distinguish vesicular and nonvesicular sterol transport mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(2):e2024149118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024149118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Besprozvannaya M, Dickson E, Li H, et al. GRAM domain proteins specialize functionally distinct ER-PM contact sites in human cells. Elife. 2018;7:e31019. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ferrari A, Whang E, Xiao X, et al. Aster-dependent nonvesicular transport facilitates dietary cholesterol uptake. Science. 2023;382(6671):eadf0966. doi: 10.1126/science.adf0966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chou JH, Jahn R.. Binding of Rab3A to synaptic vesicles. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(13):9433–9440. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.13.9433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mason B, Laman H.. The FBXL family of F-box proteins: variations on a theme. Open Biol. 2020;10(11):200319. doi: 10.1098/rsob.200319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen KY, De Giovanni M, Xu Y, et al. Inflammation switches the chemoattractant requirements for naive lymphocyte entry into lymph nodes. Cell. 2025;188(4):1019–1035.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jiang W, Zhang D, Shen J, et al. Genistein ameliorates rifampicin-undermined hepatic cholesterol efflux via the CH25H-LXRα-ABCA pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2026;74(1):615–631. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5c08641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Brown MS, Dana SE, Goldstein JL.. Cholesterol ester formation in cultured human fibroblasts. Stimulation by oxygenated sterols. J Biol Chem. 1975;250(10):4025–4027. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)41498-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Maxfield FR, Wustner D.. Intracellular cholesterol transport. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(7):891–898. doi: 10.1172/JCI0216500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ferrari A, He C, Kennelly JP, et al. Aster proteins regulate the accessible cholesterol pool in the plasma membrane. Mol Cell Biol. 2020;40(19):e00255–20. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00255-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lange Y, Swaisgood MH, Ramos BV, et al. Plasma membranes contain half the phospholipid and 90% of the cholesterol and sphingomyelin in cultured human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(7):3786–3793. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84918-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Civra A, Cagno V, Donalisio M, et al. Inhibition of pathogenic non-enveloped viruses by 25-hydroxycholesterol and 27-hydroxycholesterol. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7487. doi: 10.1038/srep07487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Moog C, Aubertin AM, Kirn A, et al. Oxysterols, but not cholesterol, inhibit human immunodeficiency virus replication in vitro. Antivir Chem Chemother. 1998;9(6):491–496. doi: 10.1177/095632029800900605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yuan Y, Fang A, Wang Z, et al. The CH24H metabolite, 24HC, blocks viral entry by disrupting intracellular cholesterol homeostasis. Redox Biol. 2023;64:102769. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Dataset S1.pdf
TEMI_A_2651464_SM5520.pdf (350.4KB, pdf)
Clean SI for review.docx

Data Availability Statement

Source data in CRISPR Activation screening are available in the Supplementary Dataset. Complementary data related to the conclusions of this study are available from the corresponding author.


Articles from Emerging Microbes & Infections are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES