Abstract
The aorta, the primary artery responsible for carrying blood away from the heart, exhibits variations in its geometric and mechanical properties along its total length. Although these properties have individually been investigated in various animal and human studies, comprehensive assessments measuring all these parameters simultaneously along the entire aortic length have not been well reported. Consequently, current models predicting the aorta’s in vivo mechanical state are based on separately obtained parameters and thus have inherent limitations. The present study systematically quantified variations in ex vivo diameter and wall thickness, in vivo axial stretch, and ex vivo biaxial mechanical properties along the descending thoracic and abdominal segments of five Yorkshire male porcine aortas. Consistent with earlier findings, diameter decreased from ~13 mm to ~3.6 mm and wall thickness decreased from ~2.05 mm to ~1.02 mm toward distal segments, whereas in vivo axial stretch increased from ~1.15 to ~1.5. Notably, the infrarenal abdominal aorta exhibited significantly higher axial stiffness compared to the mid-descending thoracic region (p < 0.05). Estimated in vivo axial stress was found to increase distally (slope = 0.1, p = 0.12), while estimated in vivo circumferential stress remained relatively constant throughout the porcine aorta’s length (slope = 0.004, p = 0.96). These results suggest that during development, position-specific axial stretches, possibly driven by spinal elongation, induce adaptive remodeling of aortic geometry and material properties to maintain relatively uniform circumferential stresses. The resulting dataset provides a comprehensive, location-specific characterization of aortic geometry and mechanics to support future computational modeling studies.
Keywords: Artery Biomechanics, Biaxial, Axial Stretch
Introduction
The aorta, the primary artery that carries blood away from the heart, plays a crucial role in maintaining systemic circulation. Along its length, the aorta exhibits marked regional variations in both geometry and mechanical properties (Concannon et al., 2020; Dwivedi et al., 2023; Sokolis, 2023, 2007; Tarraf et al., 2023). These regional differences are particularly important in the context of vascular diseases such as the formation of both aneurysms and atherosclerosis (Chowienczyk, 2015), which often alter the mechanical behaviors of this vessel and can compromise its function.
A well-documented phenomenon in arterial biomechanics is the discrepancy between the aorta’s length measured in vivo and ex vivo, first recognized over a century ago (Fuchs, 1902). Upon excision, arteries undergo significant shortening (contraction), resulting in a shorter ex vivo length compared to their in vivo configuration. The ratio of these lengths in turn, will define the in vivo axial stretch. Early work demonstrated that longitudinal strain substantially affects the biomechanical behavior of the thoracic aorta, influencing both pressure-volume relationships and overall vessel compliance (Bergel, 1961). Furthermore, studies have shown that in vivo axial stretch increases progressively along the aortic length (Guo et al., 2002; Han and Fung, 1995). Similarly, geometrical parameters such as ex vivo wall thickness and diameter decrease distally, trends that have been consistently reported across multiple species (Fung and Liu, 1989; Huang et al., 1996; Kassab, 2006; Moriwaki et al., 2011; Purslow, 1983; Rouleau et al., 2012; Sokolis and Papadodima, 2022), including pigs (Dinardo et al., 2014; Han and Fung, 1995; Ríos-Ruiz et al., 2022; Sokolis, 2007; Zunder, 2021).
Beyond geometric differences, mechanical properties of the aortic wall are also known to show regional variations. Initial studies investigating the mechanical variation primarily employed uniaxial tensile testing and canine models (Cohen et al., 1972; Tanaka and Fung, 1974). More recently, advances in planar biaxial mechanical testing have enabled a more comprehensive characterization of aortic mechanics, particularly of porcine tissue. For example, Zeinali-Davarani et al., 2015 used biaxial testing combined with multiphoton microscopy to link regional mechanical behavior to collagen microstructure along the descending thoracic aorta. They found that ex vivo stiffness increased distally, associated with earlier and more pronounced collagen fiber recruitment. Peña et al., 2015 performed uniaxial and biaxial tests on porcine upper and lower thoracic aorta to study the mechanical behavior of aortic samples. They found that the distal samples were stiffer than the proximal samples ex vivo. In a separate study, Peña et al., 2018 performed biaxial tests comparing the ascending thoracic, descending thoracic, as well as the infrarenal abdominal aorta segments from the same porcine subjects. Using established strain energy functions to quantify behaviors, they reported that the infrarenal aorta was the stiffest and most anisotropic region ex vivo. Their statistical analysis revealed significant differences in circumferential mechanical behaviors between regions, while axial properties appeared relatively position independent.
Although several groups have independently assessed in vivo axial stretch, geometry, or biaxial mechanical behavior, few have simultaneously evaluated all these parameters along the full length of the aorta (Guo et al., 2002). A recent review by Badal and Barocas, 2025 has further organized and contextualized the above-mentioned findings, highlighting the need for integrated studies that measure key mechanical and geometrical properties in the same anatomical specimen. Thus, the objective of the present study was to measure ex vivo no load diameter, ex vivo wall thickness, in vivo axial stretch, and biaxial mechanical properties along the porcine aorta in the same animal. We hypothesized that regional differences in geometry and material properties reflect developmental adaptations to positional variations in in vivo axial stretch, potentially driven by factors such as spine growth. Furthermore, we propose that these regional differences contribute to the maintenance of relatively uniform in vivo circumferential stresses along the length of the aorta from these healthy preclinical models.
Methods
Five porcine aortas were harvested from healthy Yorkshire male animals euthanized as part of unrelated studies. The animals ranged in age from 6–8 months and weighed between 70–90 Kg. Because some procedures involved recovery and reanimation of the heart and ascending thoracic aorta, only the descending thoracic and abdominal regions were available for analysis (Fig. 1a–b). Prior to excision, the usable aortic specimens were divided into 9–10 segments along their lengths and marked using pins. The in situ lengths of each segment were recorded. The time interval between death and mechanical testing was kept below 2 hours to minimize degradation and to preserve tissue viability. During this period, the specimens were maintained in a saline bath at room temperature to prevent dehydration and to maintain physiological conditions.
Figure 1.

(a) In situ view of the descending thoracic and abdominal regions of the porcine aorta prior to excision. (b) Excised aorta cleaned and prepared for segmentation and subsequent measurements. (c) Segmented aorta, illustrating clearly marked segments used to assess regional variations along the vessel length. (d) Cross-sectional view of an aortic segment demonstrating the measurements of initial luminal diameter (D0) and wall thickness (t0). (e) Square sample from an aortic segment mounted on a biaxial testing apparatus to measure mechanical properties under controlled loading conditions.
After excision and removal of the surrounding tissue, vessel geometry was assessed. Digital calipers were used to measure the ex vivo wall thickness and vessel diameter for each segment. Given the elliptical nature of the aortic cross-section, both major and minor diameters were measured. Each obtained segment length was remeasured ex vivo, and the ratio of the in situ to ex vivo lengths provided the in vivo axial stretch (λz).
Subsequently, square samples were excised from the anterior region of each segment and stored in 1X PBS solution at room temperature prior to biaxial mechanical testing. All surrounding tissue was removed prior to testing. Each sample was mounted onto a displacement-controlled biaxial testing apparatus (TA Instruments, Eden Prairie, MN) using fishhooks. A small preload (~0.025 N) was applied to remove slack and define the reference configuration. Displacement was independently controlled along four arms to generate equibiaxial loading, with both axes displaced at a constant rate of 0.2 mm/s. Specimens were stretched to a maximum stretch of approximately 1.55. Forces were recorded using calibrated load cells aligned along two orthogonal directions. Four preconditioning cycles were performed to the maximum value of 1.55 stretch. Testing was conducted in air, while samples were maintained in a saline bath at room temperature between excision and testing to preserve hydration. Forces were recorded using 200N load cells with a resolution of 0.01 N, and actuator displacements were prescribed and measured with a resolution of 0.001 mm. Deformation was quantified based on actuator displacement, and stretch was calculated as the ratio of the current specimen length (initial length plus displacement) to the initial length. The first Piola–Kirchhoff (PK1) stress was computed as the ratio of the measured force to the initial (undeformed) cross-sectional area. All tests were performed under passive conditions without pharmacological stimulation.
Many constitutive models have been proposed to reproduce the mechanical behavior of soft tissues (Alastrué et al., 2010; Gasser et al., 2005; Hill et al., 2012; Holzapfel et al., 2000). Previous work (Peña et al., 2018) found that the Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden (HGO) (Holzapfel et al., 2000) model was not able to capture the passive biaxial properties of each specific porcine aorta over a wide range of biaxial deformations. Thus, the Gasser-Ogden-Holzapfel (GOH) (Gasser et al., 2005) model, which is a generalized structure extension of HGO was fitted to the biaxial data for each sample. The strain energy function (ψr) for the GOH model is
| (1) |
| (2) |
where, I1 = trC, and I4α = aαr•C•aαr and C is the right Cauchy-Green tensor. C0 is the ground matrix shear modulus; k1 is the fiber modulus and k2 is the exponential coefficient. The formulation assumes two fiber families along the vectors aαr (α = 1,2) oriented at angled ± γ in the local e1—e2 plane, each with a dispersion κ, where . When κ = 0, the model is same as the HGO model, showing all fibers are in the direction given by aαr, while when , the stress response is isotropic and similar to that used in (Demiray, 1972). The GOH model parameters were fit in MATLAB using the fmincon optimization routine by minimizing the summed squared error between model-predicted and experimentally measured biaxial stress responses over the tested stretch range.
Regional stiffness was characterized by circumferential and axial tangent moduli, obtained as the slope of the GOH-predicted Cauchy stress–stretch curve at prescribed equibiaxial stretches of 1.05, 1.15, and 1.25. To estimate the in vivo stress state for each segment, we employed the thin-walled cylinder approximation using the geometric data, the in vivo axial stretch, and the fitted GOH model parameters. This approximation was used to obtain consistent estimates of the operating wall stress for regional comparison along the vessel length, rather than to resolve transmural stress distributions. The thin-walled approximation is given by:
| (3) |
where, t and R are in vivo thickness and radius, t0 and R0 ex vivo (unloaded) values, P is the mean arterial pressure (105mmHg (Reed et al., 2018)), 𝜎𝜃𝜃 is in vivo circumferential Cauchy stress, and 𝜆𝜃, 𝜆𝑧, 𝜆𝑟 are the circumferential, axial and radial stretches. With λz measured experimentally, and incompressibility imposing , the circumferential stress σθθ(λθ,λz, λr) can be calculated for any value of λθ using the GOH model (Parikh et al., 2024) until the pressure equation is satisfied. After solving for λθ from the pressure relation, the corresponding circumferential and axial Cauchy stresses were obtained from the fitted GOH model at that operating point. In particular, the in vivo axial stress was obtained from the axial component of the GOH-predicted Cauchy stress tensor:
| (4) |
where
| (5) |
Statistical analyses were conducted using MATLAB (MathWorks). Linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate relationships between fractional longitudinal position (FLP), which served as the independent variable, and several dependent variables including internal diameter, wall thickness, in vivo axial stretch, and estimated in vivo stresses. Regression parameters were estimated using MATLAB’s built-in functions, with model fits assessed by calculating coefficients of determination and associated p-values. Potential outliers were identified using Cook’s distance (Cook, 1977), with data points exceeding a threshold of four divided by the number of observations considered outliers and excluded from subsequent regression analyses. To compare regional mechanical properties among anatomical groups, linear mixed-effects models were used with anatomical group treated as a fixed effect and pig treated as a random effect, thereby accounting for repeated segment-level measurements obtained from the same aorta. Normality was assessed on the residuals of the mixed-effects models using Lilliefors and Jarque-Bera tests. When the omnibus mixed-effects model indicated a significant group effect (p < 0.05), pairwise group comparisons were performed using contrasts on the fitted model coefficients.
Results
To assess regional difference of the aortic properties, we used fractional longitudinal position (FLP = x/L), where x is the distance along the aorta from the left subclavian artery and L is the length between the left subclavian artery and the iliac bifurcation. Thus, FLP ranged from 0 at the left subclavian artery to 1 at the bifurcation. Because it was not possible to test every sample at identical FLP values across all animals, segments were pooled into four anatomical groups: FLP 0.20–0.40 (mid-descending thoracic aorta), 0.40–0.60 (lower-descending thoracic aorta), 0.60–0.85 (suprarenal abdominal aorta), and 0.85–1.00 (infrarenal abdominal aorta) (Fig. 1).
Both averaged diameter and wall thickness decreased along the length of the aorta in all five animals studied (Fig. 2a–b). Internal diameter declined from ~ 13 mm in the mid-descending region to ~ 3.6 mm near the iliac bifurcation, and wall thickness fell from ~ 2.05 mm to ~ 1.02 mm (linear regression: p < 0.001 for each animal). In contrast, the in vivo axial stretch ratio increased distally from ~1.15 to ~1.5, consistent with trends reported in other mammalian models (Han and Fung, 1995; Kassab, 2006). Re-plotting the geometric data pairwise (Fig. 2d–f) revealed that larger diameters correlated with thicker walls (linear regression: p < 0.001 for each animal) and that both diameter and thickness were inversely associated with λz (diameter vs. λz, linear regression: p<0.02 each animal and thickness vs. λz, linear regression: p < 0.01 each animal). The ratio of the major diameter to minor diameter showed a minor increase along with the FLP (linear regression: slope = 0.17, p=0.04) (Fig. 2g).
Figure 2.

Variations in geometric parameters and axial stretch along the FLP. (a) Diameter and (b) wall thickness progressively decrease along the aorta with increasing FLP. (c) Conversely, axial stretch increases along the vessel length. (d) Wall thickness positively correlates with luminal diameter. Both (e) diameter and (f) wall thickness inversely correlate with axial stretch. (g) The ratio of major to minor diameters increases with FLP, indicating greater ellipticity in distal segments (slope = 0.17, p = 0.04). Note: Two data points identified as outliers by Cook’s method (Cook, 1977) were excluded from analysis in panel (g).
Fig. 3a–d shows representative PK1 biaxial stress–stretch curves for two different animal in the axial and circumferential directions. As expected, the curves were highly nonlinear, but no clear positional trend was observed in the raw data. Although the GOH model parameters were fit independently for each sample, no consistent relationship between the individual fitted parameters and fractional longitudinal position was observed across animals. Because these parameters are coupled and primarily serve to reproduce the overall constitutive response, regional comparisons were based instead on stress–stretch behavior, tangent moduli, and estimated in vivo stresses, which provide a more direct functional assessment of mechanical variation along the aorta. For readers interested in the GOH fit values, all fitting results are provided in the Supplementary Material.
Figure 3.

(a-b) Axial PK1 stress and (c-d) circumferential PK1 stress plotted against corresponding axial and circumferential stretches for two different Pigs, respectively. Curves illustrate the nonlinear mechanical response of the aortic tissue under equibiaxial loading conditions.
To highlight regional differences, stresses at λ = 1.05, 1.15, and 1.25 were averaged within each FLP group. Both circumferential and axial mean stresses rose from proximal to distal segments (except the suprarenal), with the infrarenal region showing the highest values (Fig. 4a–b). Both circumferential and axial tangent moduli at λ = 1.05, 1.15, and 1.25 also generally increased from proximal to distal segments, with the infrarenal abdominal aorta exhibiting the highest values and the suprarenal abdominal aorta showing a lower stiffness relative to the infrarenal region (Fig. 4c–d). Linear mixed-effects analysis, with anatomical group treated as a fixed effect and pig as a random effect, showed significant regional effects for axial stress at all three stretches (λ = 1.05: p = 0.0449, λ = 1.15: p = 0.0099, λ = 1.25: p = 0.0081), whereas circumferential stress did not show significant regional effects at the omnibus model level (λ = 1.05: p = 0.31, λ = 1.15: p = 0.137, λ = 1.25: p = 0.112). Similarly, axial tangent modulus showed significant regional effects at all three stretches (λ = 1.05: p = 0.0102, λ = 1.15: p = 0.0073, λ = 1.25: p = 0.0093), whereas circumferential tangent modulus did not reach significance at the omnibus model level (λ = 1.05: p = 0.0710, λ = 1.15: p = 0.0877, λ = 1.25: p = 0.1077).
Figure 4.

(a) Axial and (b) circumferential first PK1 stress measured at specified equibiaxial stretch values across different aortic locations. Corresponding values of the (c) axial and (d) circumferential tangent modulus (TM) are shown, highlighting differences in local stiffness along the aortic length. The error bars represent standard deviation.
The estimated in vivo axial stress is shown in Fig. 5a, and circumferential stress is shown in Fig. 5b. The estimated axial stress increases with FLP, however the increase is statistically insignificant (linear regression: slope = 0.1, p=0.12). Higher-order polynomial regressions were also examined for the relationship between FLP and estimated in vivo axial stress. However, neither quadratic nor cubic terms significantly improved the fit relative to the linear model (nested-model F-tests: p = 0.476 and p = 0.212, respectively), and the linear model was therefore retained. On the other hand, estimations of the in vivo circumferential Cauchy stress do not exhibit consistent positional variability across the pigs. A linear fit across all data shows no evidence of significant association (linear regression: slope = 0.004, p=0.96), suggesting that, on average, circumferential stress remains relatively constant along the length of the studied aortic samples.
Figure 5.

Estimated (a) axial and (b) circumferential stresses plotted against FLP regional trends. Outliers identified using Cook’s method (Cook, 1977) were excluded from the analyses to ensure robustness of the presented trends.
Discussion
The most significant outcome of this preclinical research study was the generation of a unique dataset of geometries, mechanical behaviors, and in vivo axial stretches at different locations along the length of the aorta for swine. This dataset as a whole provided in the Supplemental Data. Estimating accurate in vivo wall stresses along the length of the descending aorta necessitates matched geometric and mechanical data. (Han and Fung, 1995) previously calculated axial stresses using their geometric parameters for canine aorta, but they used uniaxial data from a different study (Tanaka and Fung, 1974) potentially introducing significant inaccuracies. Additionally, their estimations ignored vessel pressurizations and circumferential loading. Yet, the Han and Fung study reported that the estimated axial stresses increased along with the length of aorta, and the axial tensions remained nearly constant. Dai et al., 2021 applied thin-walled cylindrical assumptions to porcine descending aortas at multiple pressures, but overlooked the actual axial stretches by assuming axial stress equaled half of the circumferential stress and treated radius–thickness ratios as constant across pressures. Such assumptions are likely inappropriate for compliant soft tissues. Similarly, Badal and Barocas, 2025 combined data from multiple studies to estimate in vivo stresses concluding that net wall stress increases distally. In contrast with those studies, our preclinical approach here combined geometrical and mechanical data from the same specimens and explicitly incorporated in vivo axial stretch, ensuring more accurate stress estimations.
Various aspects of the present work can be compared to previous reports. Multiple studies have consistently demonstrated a progressive decrease in luminal diameter and wall thickness from the thoracic to the abdominal aorta (Fung and Liu, 1989; Huang et al., 1996; Kassab, 2006; Moriwaki et al., 2011; Ríos-Ruiz et al., 2022; Sokolis, 2007; Sokolis and Papadodima, 2022). Our findings confirm this established trend, showing a monotonic reduction in both diameter and thickness as FLP increases (Fig. 2a–b). This tapering aligns with the uniform wall shear stress hypothesis, under which endothelial-mediated growth and remodeling occurs in response to reduced distal blood flow and associated wall shear stress.
Previous studies that had employed uniaxial (Krüger et al., 2016; Sokolis, 2007; Tanaka and Fung, 1974) and biaxial (Rouleau et al., 2012; Shahbad et al., 2025) testing have generally reported increased aortic stiffness with distal distance from the heart, except for Guo and Kassab, 2003, who identified the diaphragm-adjacent region of the descending thoracic aorta as the stiffest in a mouse model using uniaxial testing. Zeinali-Davarani et al., 2015 and Peña et al., 2018 performed biaxial tests on porcine aortas, though at relatively broad intervals (proximal, mid-proximal, mid-distal, and distal thoracic regions in Zeinali-Davarani et al., 2015, and ascending thoracic, descending thoracic, and infrarenal abdominal regions in Peña et al., 2018), both groups concluding similarly that the distal regions were stiffer. Our raw stress–stretch data did not elicit an explicit monotonic relationship with FLP (Fig. 3); however, regional grouping revealed that the infrarenal abdominal aorta was significantly stiffer axially compared to the mid-descending thoracic aorta (p < 0.05), although circumferential stiffness differences were not significant. The relatively lower stiffness observed in the suprarenal abdominal aorta may result from altered loading conditions at the renal bifurcation, where the branching renal arteries modify both axial and hemodynamic stresses. Given the absence of specific suprarenal samples in earlier studies and their use of broader regional pooling, their conclusions about distal stiffening effectively align with our findings.
The mechanical properties of arterial tissue are strongly influenced by extracellular matrix composition, with increased collagen content generally associated with higher stiffness, as collagen is the stiffest structural constituent of the arterial wall (Xu and Shi, 2014). Sokolis, 2007 quantified extracellular matrix composition along the length of the porcine aorta and reported a progressive increase in collagen content with distance from the heart, a trend that is broadly consistent with the elevated axial stiffness observed in distal segments in the present study. However, collagen content alone does not fully explain the distinct mechanical behavior of the suprarenal abdominal aorta. Although collagen abundance may be elevated in this region, local differences in collagen organization, fiber recruitment, dispersion, or interactions with elastin and smooth muscle may play a dominant role in governing its mechanical response. Because the present study did not include direct compositional or microstructural measurements, these interpretations remain speculative, and future studies combining biaxial testing with histological or microstructural analyses will be required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the suprarenal region’s distinct behavior.
Our calculated in vivo stresses show a steady increase in axial stress with FLP, whereas circumferential stress remains constant (Fig. 4). From the perspective of tensional homeostasis (Flynn et al., 2013; Stamenović and Smith, 2020), elevated axial stress in the IAA necessitates additional collagen fibers to maintain target fiber stress. Histological studies confirm that collagen content increases in distal aortic segments (Liyanage et al., 2022; Sokolis, 2007), and given collagen’s nonlinear stiffness (Weisbecker et al., 2012), its higher level under higher axial stress provides an explanation for the observed increase in axial tangent modulus toward the iliac bifurcation.
The uniform circumferential stress hypothesis (Kassab, 2006) suggests that arteries remodel to maintain consistent circumferential wall stress, thus achieving tensional homeostasis (Flynn et al., 2013; Stamenović and Smith, 2020). Our data support this hypothesis, showing nearly constant circumferential stress along the length of the swine descending aortic. Additionally, the observed distal thinning can be partially attributed to the maintenance of uniform circumferential stress. According to Laplace’s law, as the diameter decreases in response to regulated flow and endothelial signaling, wall thickness must also diminish proportionally to sustain stable circumferential stress, maintaining approximately 230 kPa throughout the aorta.
Our findings suggest a possible mechanism: during early development, rapid growth—particularly elongation of the spine (Chatelain et al., 2024)—imposes region-specific in vivo axial stretch on the aorta. In response, the aorta grows and remodels accordingly, adjusting its geometric and mechanical parameters to maintain near-uniform circumferential stress levels. This adaptive development enables the aorta to accommodate changes in the mechanical environment throughout growth. Recent research has further indicated that in vivo axial stretch decreases with age in human abdominal aortas (Horny et al., 2014, 2011). Thus, it can be speculated that while axial length is externally imposed, in vivo axial stretch itself is modulated by tissue remodeling due to aging. The greater than 1 in vivo axial stretch suggests that the remodeling does not “keep up” with the imposed stretch, or that coupling between the directions and the pressure-imposed non-zero circumferential stress and the axial stress requires a greater than unity axial stretch or both.
Beyond confirming established results, our comprehensive dataset provides a crucial baseline for future modeling studies. Over recent decades, various continuum (Rodriguez et al., 1994), discrete (Humphrey and Rajagopal, 2002), combined (Cyron et al., 2016; Gacek et al., 2022), and bio-chemo-mechanical (Flanary and Barocas, 2023; Irons and Humphrey, 2020) models have investigated arterial growth and remodeling. Typically, these models assume a baseline healthy geometry derived from prior experimental or theoretical studies, subsequently applying perturbations to simulate disease progression. Yet, such studies rarely address how the healthy baseline parameters are established during development or account for regional variations along the aortic length. We suggest here that our data bridges this critical gap by providing detailed, experimentally verified benchmarks for establishing accurate healthy-state preclinical models.
Previous modeling studies by Alford et al., 2008 and Alford and Taber, 2008 successfully predicted variations in opening angles and in vivo axial stretch, comparing their computational results to experimental data from Fung and Liu, 1989 in rats and Guo et al., 2002 in C57bl/6 mice. Nevertheless, those studies did not include biaxial mechanical properties, and their reliance on mixed datasets from different studies and species introduces inherent inconsistencies. The comprehensive experimental dataset presented here addresses these limitations, providing robust and consistent benchmarks for validating future computational predictions of aortic mechanical and geometric properties across regions. Opening angle was not measured here, and future studies incorporating residual strain measurements together with biaxial mechanics would further strengthen region-specific constitutive and growth-and-remodeling models.
While the present study was conducted using porcine aortas, and direct quantitative mapping to human aortic properties is not appropriate, several of the regional trends observed here are consistent with prior human studies. In particular, healthy human aortas exhibit a progressive decrease in diameter and wall thickness along their length, along with regional variations in mechanical stiffness and in vivo axial stretch (Chen et al., 2024; Sokolis et al., 2020, 2017). Similarly, the increase in stiffness toward distal segments observed in this study aligns with reported trends in human aortic tissue (Kamenskiy et al., 2014). These qualitative consistencies suggest that, despite interspecies differences, the underlying biomechanical principles governing regional adaptation may be conserved. As such, the dataset presented here provides a valuable and internally consistent benchmark for developing, calibrating, and validating computational models of arterial mechanics. Importantly, such models can incorporate species-specific parameters where needed, while still leveraging the spatial relationships and coupled measurements reported in this study.
The present study employs planar biaxial testing, a widely used and well-validated approach for characterizing the intrinsic material behavior of arterial tissue under controlled multiaxial loading (Peña et al., 2015; Zunder, 2021). As with any ex vivo methodology, planar biaxial testing involves simplifying assumptions. Because the aorta is a cylindrical structure, flattening the tissue alters vessel curvature and releases residual stresses present in the intact wall. In addition, planar testing does not preserve through-thickness stress gradients or axial–circumferential coupling associated with pressurization of intact vessels. Inflation testing of arterial segments provides a complementary, physiologically representative loading configuration by maintaining native geometry and stress states. Importantly, inflation-based measurements reported by Dwivedi et al., 2023 similarly demonstrate an increase in aortic stiffness with distance from the heart, consistent with the regional trends observed here, indicating that the distal stiffening reported in this study is not an artifact of the testing modality.
A further limitation of this study is that only equibiaxial loading was applied. Previous studies have shown that applying multiple loading ratios (e.g., 1:1, 1:2, 2:1) provides a more complete characterization of soft tissue anisotropy and fiber recruitment (Ahuja et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2016). In addition, estimation of in vivo stresses relied on a thin-walled cylinder approximation, which neglects wall heterogeneity and transmural stress variations. These assumptions may affect the absolute stress estimates but are unlikely to alter the relative regional trends reported here.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the NIH grant R01 HL164800.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- Ahuja A, Noblet JN, Trudnowski T, Patel B, Krieger JF, Chambers S, Kassab GS, 2018. Biomechanical Material Characterization of Stanford Type-B Dissected Porcine Aortas. Front. Physiol 9. 10.3389/fphys.2018.01317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alastrué V, Sáez P, Martínez MA, Doblaré M, 2010. On the use of the Bingham statistical distribution in microsphere-based constitutive models for arterial tissue. Mechanics Research Communications 37, 700–706. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2010.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alford PW, Humphrey JD, Taber LA, 2008. Growth and remodeling in a thick-walled artery model: Effects of spatial variations in wall constituents. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 7, 245–262. 10.1007/S10237-007-0101-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alford PW, Taber LA, 2008. Computational study of growth and remodelling in the aortic arch. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 11, 525–538. 10.1080/10255840801930710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Badal RM, Barocas VH, 2025. Biomechanical Variation of the Vessel Wall Along the Length of the Healthy Aorta—Linking Geometric, Flow-, and Pressure-Mediated Adaptations. J Biomech Eng 148. 10.1115/1.4070287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergel DH, 1961. The static elastic properties of the arterial wall. The Journal of Physiology 156, 445–457. 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chatelain LS, Simon A-L, Khalifé M, Ferrero E, 2024. Pediatric spinal alignment and spinal development. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ) 20. 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen H, Zhao M, Li Y, Wang Q, Xing Y, Bian C, Li J, 2024. A study on the ultimate mechanical properties of middle-aged and elderly human aorta based on uniaxial tensile test. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol 12. 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1357056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chowienczyk PJ, 2015. Aortic Stiffness and Disease. Circulation 131, 1745–1747. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen J, Litwin SB, Aaron A, Fine S, 1972. The rupture force and tensile strength of canine aortic tissue. Journal of Surgical Research 13, 321–333. 10.1016/0022-4804(72)90083-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Concannon J, Dockery P, Black A, Sultan S, Hynes N, McHugh PE, Moerman KM, McGarry JP, 2020. Quantification of the regional bioarchitecture in the human aorta. Journal of Anatomy 236, 142–155. 10.1111/joa.13076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cook RD, 1977. Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression. Technometrics 19, 15–18. 10.1080/00401706.1977.10489493 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cyron CJ, Aydin RC, Humphrey JD, 2016. A homogenized constrained mixture (and mechanical analog) model for growth and remodeling of soft tissue. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 15, 1389–1403. 10.1007/s10237-016-0770-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dai J, Zhuang J, Li G, Cheng H, 2021. Mechanical Properties of Aortic Artery by Uniaxial Tensile Tests under Physiological Condition, in: 4th International Conference on Biometric Engineering and Applications, ICBEA ‘21. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 98–103. 10.1145/3476779.3476796 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Demiray H, 1972. A note on the elasticity of soft biological tissues. Journal of Biomechanics 5, 309–311. 10.1016/0021-9290(72)90047-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinardo CL, Venturini G, Zhou EH, Watanabe IS, Campos LCG, Dariolli R, da Motta-Leal-Filho JM, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KHM, Krieger JE, Alencar AM, Pereira AC, 2014. Variation of mechanical properties and quantitative proteomics of VSMC along the arterial tree. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 306, H505–H516. 10.1152/ajpheart.00655.2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dwivedi K. kr., Lakhani P, Yadav A, Deepak, Kumar S, Kumar N, 2023. Location specific multiscale characterization and constitutive modeling of pig aorta. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 142, 105809. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flanary SM, Barocas VH, 2023. A structural bio-chemo-mechanical model for vascular smooth muscle cell traction force microscopy. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 22, 1221–1238. 10.1007/s10237-023-01713-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flynn BP, Tilburey GE, Ruberti JW, 2013. Highly sensitive single-fibril erosion assay demonstrates mechanochemical switch in native collagen fibrils. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 12, 291–300. 10.1007/S10237-012-0399-2/METRICS [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs RF (Richard F, 1902. Zur Physiologie und Wachstumsmechanik des Blutgefäss-Systemes. Gustav Fischer. [Google Scholar]
- Fung YC, Liu SQ, 1989. Change of residual strains in arteries due to hypertrophy caused by aortic constriction. Circulation Research 65, 1340–1349. 10.1161/01.RES.65.5.1340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gacek E, Mahutga RR, Barocas VH, 2022. Hybrid discrete-continuum multiscale model of tissue growth and remodeling. Acta Biomaterialia. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA, 2005. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 3, 15–35. 10.1098/rsif.2005.0073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo X, Kassab GS, 2003. Variation of mechanical properties along the length of the aorta in C57bl/ 6 mice. American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology 285. 10.1152/ajpheart.00567.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo X, Kono Y, Mattrey R, Kassab GS, 2002. Morphometry and strain distribution of the C57BL/6J mouse aorta. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 10.1152/ajpheart.00224.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han H-C, Fung Y-C, 1995. Longitudinal strain of canine and porcine aortas. Journal of Biomechanics 28, 637–641. 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00091-H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill MR, Duan X, Gibson GA, Watkins S, Robertson AM, 2012. A theoretical and non-destructive experimental approach for direct inclusion of measured collagen orientation and recruitment into mechanical models of the artery wall. Journal of Biomechanics, Special Issue on Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics 45, 762–771. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW, 2000. A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models. Journal of Elasticity 61, 1–48. 10.1023/A:1010835316564 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Horny L, Adamek T, Gultova E, Zitny R, Vesely J, Chlup H, Konvickova S, 2011. Correlations between age, prestrain, diameter and atherosclerosis in the male abdominal aorta. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Special Issue Soft Tissues 4, 2128–2132. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horny L, Adamek T, Kulvajtova M, 2014. Analysis of axial prestretch in the abdominal aorta with reference to post mortem interval and degree of atherosclerosis. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, Forensic Biomechanics 33, 93–98. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang M, Han H, Zhao L, 1996. Residual Strain in Canine Arteries. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering (English Edition) 5. [Google Scholar]
- Humphrey JD, Rajagopal KR, 2002. A constrained mixture model for growth and remodeling of soft tissues. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 12, 407–430. 10.1142/S0218202502001714 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Irons L, Humphrey JD, 2020. Cell signaling model for arterial mechanobiology. PLOS Computational Biology 16, e1008161. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamenskiy AV, Dzenis YA, Kazmi SAJ, Pemberton MA, Pipinos II, Phillips NY, Herber K, Woodford T, Bowen RE, Lomneth CS, MacTaggart JN, 2014. Biaxial mechanical properties of the human thoracic and abdominal aorta, common carotid, subclavian, renal and common iliac arteries. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13, 1341–1359. 10.1007/s10237-014-0576-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kassab GS, 2006. Biomechanics of the cardiovascular system: the aorta as an illustratory example. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 3, 719. 10.1098/rsif.2006.0138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krüger T, Veseli K, Lausberg H, Vöhringer L, Schneider W, Schlensak C, 2016. Regional and directional compliance of the healthy aorta: an ex vivo study in a porcine model†. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 23, 104–111. 10.1093/icvts/ivw053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liyanage L, Musto L, Budgeon C, Rutty G, Biggs M, Saratzis A, Vorp DA, Vavourakis V, Bown M, Tsamis A, 2022. Multimodal Structural Analysis of the Human Aorta: From Valve to Bifurcation. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 63, 721–730. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moriwaki T, Oie T, Takamizawa K, Murayama Y, Fukuda T, Omata S, Kanda K, Nakayama Y, 2011. Variations in local elastic modulus along the length of the aorta as observed by use of a scanning haptic microscope (SHM). J Artif Organs 14, 276–283. 10.1007/s10047-011-0596-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parikh S, Giudici A, Huberts W, Delhaas T, Bidar E, Spronck B, Reesink K, 2024. Significance of Dynamic Axial Stretching on Estimating Biomechanical Behavior and Properties of the Human Ascending Aorta. Ann Biomed Eng 52, 2485–2495. 10.1007/s10439-024-03537-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peña JA, Corral V, Martínez MA, Peña E, 2018. Over length quantification of the multiaxial mechanical properties of the ascending, descending and abdominal aorta using Digital Image Correlation. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 77, 434–445. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peña JA, Martínez MA, Peña E, 2015. Layer-specific residual deformations and uniaxial and biaxial mechanical properties of thoracic porcine aorta. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 50, 55–69. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Purslow PP, 1983. Positional variations in fracture toughness, stiffness and strength of descending thoracic pig aorta. Journal of Biomechanics 16, 947–953. 10.1016/0021-9290(83)90058-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reed R, Barletta M, Grimes J, Mumaw J, Park HJ, Giguère S, Azain M, Fang X, Quandt J, 2018. Accuracy of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor in anesthetized pigs. Lab Anim 52, 490–496. 10.1177/0023677218763686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ríos-Ruiz I, Martínez MÁ, Peña E, 2022. Is location a significant parameter in the layer dependent dissection properties of the aorta? Biomech Model Mechanobiol 21, 1887–1901. 10.1007/s10237-022-01627-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez EK, Hoger A, McCulloch AD, 1994. Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues. Journal of Biomechanics 27, 455–467. 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90021-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rouleau L, Tremblay D, Cartier R, Mongrain R, Leask RL, 2012. Regional variations in canine descending aortic tissue mechanical properties change with formalin fixation. Cardiovascular Pathology 21, 390–397. 10.1016/j.carpath.2011.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shahbad R, Kazim M, Razian SA, Desyatova A, Jadidi M, 2025. Variations in stiffness and structure of the human aorta along its length. Sci Rep 15, 11120. 10.1038/s41598-025-95008-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sokolis DP, 2023. Layer-Specific Tensile Strength of the Human Aorta: Segmental Variations. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 145. 10.1115/1.4056748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sokolis DP, 2007. Passive mechanical properties and structure of the aorta: segmental analysis. Acta Physiologica 190, 277–289. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01661.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sokolis DP, Bompas A, Papadodima SA, Kourkoulis SK, 2020. Variation of Axial Residual Strains Along the Course and Circumference of Human Aorta Considering Age and Gender. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 142. 10.1115/1.4043877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sokolis DP, Papadodima SA, 2022. Regional delamination strength in the human aorta underlies the anatomical localization of the dissection channel. Journal of Biomechanics 141, 111174. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sokolis DP, Savva GD, Papadodima SA, Kourkoulis SK, 2017. Regional distribution of circumferential residual strains in the human aorta according to age and gender. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 67, 87–100. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamenović D, Smith ML, 2020. Tensional homeostasis at different length scales. Soft Matter 16, 6946–6963. 10.1039/D0SM00763C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka TT, Fung Y-C, 1974. Elastic and inelastic properties of the canine aorta and their variation along the aortic tree. Journal of Biomechanics 7, 357–370. 10.1016/0021-9290(74)90031-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tarraf SA, Kramer B, Vianna E, Gillespie C, Germano E, Emerton KB, Amini R, Colbrunn R, Hargrave J, Roselli EE, Bellini C, 2023. Lengthwise regional mechanics of the human aneurysmal ascending thoracic aorta. Acta Biomaterialia 162, 266–277. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.03.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Zeinali-Davarani S, Zhang Y, 2016. Arterial mechanics considering the structural and mechanical contributions of ECM constituents. Journal of Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Biomechanics in Health and Disease 49, 2358–2365. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weisbecker H, Pierce DM, Regitnig P, Holzapfel GA, 2012. Layer-specific damage experiments and modeling of human thoracic and abdominal aortas with non-atherosclerotic intimal thickening. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 12, 93–106. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J, Shi G-P, 2014. Vascular wall extracellular matrix proteins and vascular diseases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease 1842, 2106–2119. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeinali-Davarani S, Wang Y, Chow M-J, Turcotte R, Zhang Y, 2015. Contribution of Collagen Fiber Undulation to Regional Biomechanical Properties Along Porcine Thoracic Aorta. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 137. 10.1115/1.4029637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zunder D, 2021. Biaxial Mechanical Testing of Native and Glycosaminoglycan-Depleted Porcine Aortic Wall. Université d’Ottawa / University of Ottawa. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
