Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1993 Mar;59(2):309–322. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-309

Selective associations produced solely with appetitive contingencies: the stimulus-reinforcer interaction revisited.

S J Weiss 1, L V Panlilio 1, C W Schindler 1
PMCID: PMC1322044  PMID: 8454957

Abstract

In studies reporting stimulus-reinforcer interactions in traditional conditioning paradigms, when a tone-light compound was associated with food the light gained stimulus control, but when the compound was paired with shock avoidance the tone gained control. However, the physical nature of the reinforcer-related events (food vs. shock) presented in the presence of the tone-light compound was always confounded with the conditioned hedonic value of the compound's presence relative to its absence. When the compound was paired with shock, its presence was negative relative to its absence (which was shock-free). In contrast, when the compound was paired with food, its presence was positive relative to its absence (which was food-free). The present experiment dealt with this confounding effect by conditioning a tone-light compound to be positive or negative, relative to its absence, solely with food reinforcement. One group of rats received food for responding in the presence of the tone-light compound and no food in its absence. The other group also responded in the presence of the compound, but received food only in its absence. These rats were trained on a chained schedule in which responding in the presence of the tone-light compound produced a terminal link signaled by the absence of the compound; responding ceased in the terminal link because it delayed food delivery. In a test session to assess stimulus control by the elements of the compound, tone and light were presented separately under extinction conditions. Rats that had been exposed to a positive correlation between food and the compound emitted almost double the responses in the presence of the light as in the presence of the tone. In comparison, rats that had been exposed to a negative correlation emitted only two thirds as many responses in the presence of the light as in the presence of the tone. Because this selective association was produced using only food, it appears that the contingencies under which a reinforcer is presented, rather than (or as well as) its physical properties, can generate the selective associations previously attributed to "stimulus-reinforcer interactions." This could mean that regardless of the class of reinforcer that ultimately maintains responding (appetitive or aversive), the contingency-generated hedonic value of the compound stimulus may influence the dominant modality of stimulus control.

Full text

PDF
309

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Auge R. J. Context, observing behavior, and conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Nov;22(3):525–533. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azrin N. H., Hutchinson R. R., Hake D. F. Extinction-induced aggression. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):191–204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dinsmoor J. A., Bowe C. A., Green L., Hanson J. Information on response requirements compared with information on food density as a reinforcer of observing in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Mar;49(2):229–237. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Foree D. D., LoLordo V. M. Attention in the pigeon: differential effects of food-getting versus shock-avoidance procedures. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973 Dec;85(3):551–558. doi: 10.1037/h0035300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HOLZ W. C., AZRIN N. H., AYLLON T. Elimination of behavior of mental patients by response-produced extinction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:407–412. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leitenberg H. Is time-out from positive reinforcement an aversive event? A review of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull. 1965 Dec;64(6):428–441. doi: 10.1037/h0022657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lolordo V. M. Positive conditioned reinforcement from aversive situations. Psychol Bull. 1969 Sep;72(3):193–203. doi: 10.1037/h0027907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mulvaney D. E., Dinsmoor J. A., Jwaideh A. R., Hughes L. H. Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):37–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rescorla R. A. Establishment of a positive reinforcer through contrast with shock. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1969 Feb;67(2):260–263. doi: 10.1037/h0026789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shettleworth S. J. Stimulus relevance in the control of drinking and conditioned fear responses in domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972 Aug;80(2):175–198. doi: 10.1037/h0032996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. VERHAVE T. The functional properties of a time out from an avoidance schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:391–422. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weiss S. J. Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Nov;30(3):361–381. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Weiss S. J., Weissman R. D. Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Mar;57(2):127–143. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES