Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1992 Sep;58(2):377–388. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-377

Reinforcement magnitude and pausing on progressive-ratio schedules

Alan Baron, Jeffrey Mikorski, Michael Schlund
PMCID: PMC1322068  PMID: 16812671

Abstract

Rats responded under progressive-ratio schedules for sweetened milk reinforcers; each session ended when responding ceased for 10 min. Experiment 1 varied the concentration of milk and the duration of postreinforcement timeouts. Postreinforcement pausing increased as a positively accelerated function of the size of the ratio, and the rate of increase was reduced as a function of concentration and by timeouts of 10 s or longer. Experiment 2 varied reinforcement magnitude within sessions (number of dipper operations per reinforcer) in conjunction with stimuli correlated with the upcoming magnitude. In the absence of discriminative stimuli, pausing was longer following a large reinforcer than following a small one. Pauses were reduced by a stimulus signaling a large upcoming reinforcer, particularly at the highest ratios, and the animals tended to quit responding when the past reinforcer was large and the stimulus signaled that the next one would be small. Results of both experiments revealed parallels between responding under progressive-ratio schedules and other schedules containing ratio contingencies. Relationships between pausing and magnitude suggest that ratio pausing is under the joint control of inhibitory properties of the past reinforcer and excitatory properties of stimuli correlated with the upcoming reinforcer, rather than under the exclusive control of either factor alone.

Keywords: postreinforcement pause, reinforcer magnitude, progressive-ratio schedules, ratio schedules of reinforcement, timeout from reinforcement, inhibitory effects of reinforcement, lever press, rats

Full text

PDF
377

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blakely E., Schlinger H. Determinants of pausing under variable-ratio schedules: Reinforcer magnitude, ratio size, and schedule configuration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):65–73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonem M., Crossman E. K. Elucidating the effects of reinforcement magnitude. Psychol Bull. 1988 Nov;104(3):348–362. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.3.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Felton M., Lyon D. O. The post-reinforcement pause. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Mar;9(2):131–134. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HODOS W., KALMAN G. Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:387–392. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HODOS W. Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength. Science. 1961 Sep 29;134(3483):943–944. doi: 10.1126/science.134.3483.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hurwitz H. M., Davis H. Depriving rats of food: A reappraisal of two techniques. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Sep;40(2):211–213. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Keesey R. E., Goldstein M. D. Use of progressive fixed-ratio procedures in the assessment of intracranial reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):293–301. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lowe C. F., Davey G. C., Harzem P. Effects of reinforcement magnitude on interval and ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Nov;22(3):553–560. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mazur J. E., Hyslop M. E. Fixed-ratio performance with and without a postreinforcement timeout. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):143–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Perone M., Courtney K. Fixed-ratio pausing: Joint effects of past reinforcer magnitude and stimuli correlated with upcoming magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jan;57(1):33–46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Powell R. W. The effect of reinforcement magnitude upon responding under fixed-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):605–608. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Powell R. W. The effect of small sequential changes in fixed-ratio size upon the post-reinforcement pause. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):589–593. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Priddle-Higson P. J., Lowe C. F., Harzem P. Aftereffects of reinforcement on variable-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 May;25(3):347–354. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schlinger H., Blakely E., Kaczor T. Pausing under variable-ratio schedules: Interaction of reinforcer magnitude, variable-ratio size, and lowest ratio. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):133–139. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thomas J. R. Changes in progressive-ratio performance under increased pressures of air. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):553–562. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Williams B. A. Another look at contrast in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):345–384. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zeiler M. D. The sleeping giant: Reinforcement schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):485–493. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES