Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1992 Nov;58(3):557–575. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-557

Conditioned reinforcement of human observing behavior by descriptive and arbitrary verbal stimuli

Michael Perone, Barbara J Kaminski
PMCID: PMC1322102  PMID: 16812679

Abstract

College students earned monetary reinforcers by pressing a key according to a compound schedule with variable-interval and extinction components. Pressing additional keys occasionally produced displays of either of two verbal stimuli; one was uncorrelated with the schedule components, and the other was correlated with the extinction component. In Experiments 1 and 2, the display area of the apparatus was blank unless an observing key was pressed, whereupon a descriptive message appeared. Most students preferred an uncorrelated stimulus stating that “Some of this time scores are TWICE AS LIKELY as normal, and some of this time NO SCORES can be earned” over a stimulus stating that “At this time NO SCORES can be earned.” In Experiment 3, the display area indicated that “The Current Status of the Program is: NOT SHOWN.” Presses on the observing keys replaced this message with stimuli that provided arbitrary labels for the schedule conditions. All of the students preferred a stimulus stating that “The Current Status of the Program is: B” over an uncorrelated stimulus stating that “The Current Status of the Program is: either A or B.” Thus, under some circumstances, observing was maintained by a stimulus correlated with extinction—a finding that poses a challenge for Pavolvian accounts of conditioned reinforcement. Differences in the maintenance of observing by the descriptive and arbitrary stimuli may be attributed to differences in either the strength or nature of the instructional control exerted by the verbal stimuli.

Keywords: conditioned reinforcement, observing, instructions, S−, uncorrelated stimulus, delayreduction hypothesis, information, response effort, key press, college students

Full text

PDF
557

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen K. D., Lattal K. A. On conditioned reinforcing effects of negative discriminative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):335–339. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baron A., Galizio M. Clock control of human performance on avoidance and fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Sep;26(2):165–180. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Case D. A., Fantino E. The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jan;35(1):93–108. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Case D. A., Fantino E., Wixted J. Human observing: maintained by negative informative stimuli only if correlated with improvement in response efficiency. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):289–300. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Case D. A., Ploog B. O., Fantino E. Observing behavior in a computer game. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):185–199. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dinsmoor J. A., Browne M. P., Lawrence C. E. A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jul;18(1):79–85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fantino E., Case D. A. Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Sep;40(2):193–210. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Galizio M. Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jan;31(1):53–70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayes S. C., Brownstein A. J., Zettle R. D., Rosenfarb I., Korn Z. Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):237–256. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jenkins H. M., Boakes R. A. Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Sep;20(2):197–207. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KELLEHER R. T., GOLLUB L. R. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:543–597. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katz H. N. A test of the reinforcing properties of stimuli correlated with nonreinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jul;26(1):45–56. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kendall S. B. Redundant information in an observing-response procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):81–92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mueller K. L., Dinsmoor J. A. Testing the reinforcing properties of S-: a replication of Lieberman's procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):17–25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mueller K. L., Dinsmoor J. A. The effect of negative stimulus presentations on observing-response rates. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):281–291. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mulvaney D. E., Dinsmoor J. A., Jwaideh A. R., Hughes L. H. Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):37–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mulvaney D. E., Hughes L. H., Jwaideh A. R., Dinsmoor J. A. Differential production of positive and negative discriminative stimuli by normal and retarded children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1981 Dec;32(3):389–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(81)90104-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Perone M., Baron A. Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):239–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Torgrud L. J., Holborn S. W. The effects of verbal performance descriptions on nonverbal operant responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):273–291. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WYCKOFF L. B., Jr The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Psychol Rev. 1952 Nov;59(6):431–442. doi: 10.1037/h0053932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilton R. N., Clements R. O. Observing responses and informative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):199–204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES