Abstract
Emitting a certain response and waiting for a specified time without making that response had the same consequence. In Experiment 1, food-deprived pigeons were as likely to wait as to respond only if waiting provided food at a much higher frequency than did pecking. In Experiment 2, the consequence for humans was a brief light flash and tone. People were not biased for responding over waiting. Instead, their choices suggested crude payoff maximization. In Experiment 3, pigeons again obtained food, but they were not food deprived and could eat freely at each opportunity. Their behavior was more like that of the humans of Experiment 2 than that of food-deprived pigeons given small quantities of food at each feeding opportunity. The three experiments together showed that biases for responding over waiting were neither inherent characteristics of species nor inevitable outcomes of particular schedules. Choice between active search and waiting depended on ecological–motivational factors even when species and schedules were held constant.
Keywords: choice, foraging, open and closed feeding economy, waiting versus responding, differential reinforcement of not responding, motivation, key peck, key press, pigeons, humans
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hursh S. R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):219–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Killeen P. R. Mechanics of the animate. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):429–463. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skinner B. F., Morse W. H. Sustained performance during very long experimental sessions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Aug;1(3):235–244. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Timberlake W., Peden B. F. On the distinction between open and closed economies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):35–60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams B. A. Dissociation of theories of choice by temporal spacing of choice opportunities. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Jul;18(3):287–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeiler M. D. Elimination of reinforced behavior: intermittent schedules of not-responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):23–32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeiler M. D. Positive reinforcement and the elimination of reinforced responses. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jul;26(1):37–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeiler M. D. Reinforcing the absence of fixed-ratio performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 May;31(3):321–332. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeiler M. D., Scott G. K., Hoyert M. S. Optimal temporal differentiation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Mar;47(2):191–200. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeiler M. D., Solano J. M. Responses and pauses: discrimination and a choice catastrophe. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Mar;37(2):223–231. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]