Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1993 Nov;60(3):495–514. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-495

Signal-detection properties of verbal self-reports.

T S Critchfield 1
PMCID: PMC1322161  PMID: 8283146

Abstract

The bias (B'H) and discriminability (A') of college students' self-reports about choices made in a delayed identity matching-to-sample task were studied as a function of characteristics of the response about which they reported. Each matching-to-sample trial consisted of two, three, or four simultaneously presented sample stimuli, a 1-s retention interval, and two, three, or four comparison stimuli. One sample stimulus was always reproduced among the comparisons, and choice of the matching comparison in less than 800 ms produced points worth chances in a drawing for money. After each choice, subjects pressed either a "yes" or a "no" button to answer a computer-generated query about whether the choice met the point contingency. The number of sample and comparison stimuli was manipulated across experimental conditions. Rates of successful matching-to-sample choices were negatively correlated with the number of matching-to-sample stimuli, regardless of whether samples or comparisons were manipulated. As in previous studies, subjects exhibited a pronounced bias for reporting successful responses. Self-report bias tended to become less pronounced as matching-to-sample success became less frequent, an outcome consistent with signal-frequency effects in psychophysical research. The bias was also resistant to change, suggesting influences other than signal frequency that remain to be identified. Self-report discriminability tended to decrease with the number of sample stimuli and increase with the number of comparison stimuli, an effect not attributable to differential effects of the two manipulations on matching-to-sample performance. Overall, bias and discriminability indices revealed effects that were not evident in self-report accuracy scores. The results indicate that analyses based on signal-detection theory can improve the description of correspondence between self-reports and their referents and thus contribute to the identification of environmental sources of control over verbal self-reports.

Full text

PDF
495

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baron A., Menich S. R. Reaction times of younger and older men: effects of compound samples and a prechoice signal on delayed matching-to-sample performances. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):1–14. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Critchfield T. S., Perone M. Verbal self-reports about matching to sample: effects of the number of elements in a compound sample stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):193–214. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Critchfield T. S., Perone M. Verbal self-reports of delayed matching to sample by humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):321–344. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goszczyńska M., Rosłan A. Self-evaluation of drivers' skill: a cross-cultural comparison. Accid Anal Prev. 1989 Jun;21(3):217–224. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(89)90012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grier J. B. Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. Psychol Bull. 1971 Jun;75(6):424–429. doi: 10.1037/h0031246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HEFFERLINE R. F., PERERA T. B. Proprioceptive discrimination of a covert operant without its observation by the subject. Science. 1963 Mar 1;139(3557):834–835. doi: 10.1126/science.139.3557.834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Halbreich U., Bakhai Y., Bacon K. B., Goldstein S., Asnis G. M., Endicott J., Lesser J. The normalcy of self-proclaimed "normal volunteers". Am J Psychiatry. 1989 Aug;146(8):1052–1055. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.8.1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heriot J. T., Schmickel C. A. Maternal estimate of IQ in children evaluated for learning potential. Am J Ment Defic. 1967 May;71(6):920–924. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kausler D. H., Phillips P. L. Instructional variation and adult age differences in activity memory. Exp Aging Res. 1988 Winter;14(4):195–199. doi: 10.1080/03610738808259747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nelson T. M., McIntyre J. W., LaBrie I. G., Csiky A. Self-perception of the ability to work in the cold. Behav Med. 1991 Spring;17(1):15–23. doi: 10.1080/08964289.1991.9937548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pennebaker J. W., Hoover C. W. Visceral perception versus visceral detection: disentangling methods and assumptions. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1984 Sep;9(3):339–352. doi: 10.1007/BF00998977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Perone M., Courtney K. Fixed-ratio pausing: Joint effects of past reinforcer magnitude and stimuli correlated with upcoming magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jan;57(1):33–46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shimp C. P. The local organization of behavior: discrimination of and memory for simple behavioral patterns. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):303–315. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stevenson H. W., Chen C., Lee S. Y. Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children: ten years later. Science. 1993 Jan 1;259(5091):53–58. doi: 10.1126/science.8418494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stevenson H. W., Lee S. Y., Chen C. S., Lummis M., Stigler J., Fan L., Ge F. Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. Child Dev. 1990 Aug;61(4):1053–1066. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stevenson H. W., Lee S. Y., Stigler J. W. Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children. Science. 1986 Feb 14;231(4739):693–699. doi: 10.1126/science.3945803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taylor S. E., Brown J. D. Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol Bull. 1988 Mar;103(2):193–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES