Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1993 Nov;60(3):543–557. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-543

Session duration and the VI response function: Within-session prospective and retrospective effects

James D Dougan, J Alfred Kuh, K L Vink
PMCID: PMC1322164  PMID: 16812719

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effects of session duration on responding during simple variable-interval schedules. In Experiment 1, rats were exposed to a series of simple variable-interval schedules differing in both session duration (10 min or 30 min) and scheduled reinforcement rate (7.5 s, 15 s, 30 s, and 480 s). The functions relating response rate to reinforcement rate were predominantly monotonic for the short (10-min) sessions but were predominantly bitonic for the long (30-min) sessions, when data from the entire session were considered. Examination of responding within sessions suggested that differences in the whole-session data were produced by a combination of prospective processes (i.e., processes based on events scheduled to occur later in the session) and retrospective processes (i.e., processes based on events that had already occurred in the session). In Experiment 2, rats were exposed to a modified discrimination procedure in which pellet flavor (standard or banana) predicted session duration (10 min or 30 min). All rats came to respond faster during the short (10-min) sessions than during the first 10 min of the long sessions. As in Experiment 1, the results seemed to reflect the simultaneous operation of both prospective and retrospective processes. The results shed light on the recent controversy over the form of the variable-interval response function by identifying one variable (session duration) and two types of processes (prospective and retrospective) that influence responding on these schedules.

Keywords: variable-interval response function, satiation, prospective processes, retrospective processes, within-session effects, simple schedules, bar press, rats

Full text

PDF
543

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baum W. M. Optimization and the matching law as accounts of instrumental behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):387–403. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Booth D. A. Conditioned satiety in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972 Dec;81(3):457–471. doi: 10.1037/h0033692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Booth D. A., Davis J. D. Gastrointestinal factors in the acquisition of oral sensory control of satiation. Physiol Behav. 1973 Jul;11(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(73)90117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COLLIER G., MYERS L. The loci of reinforcement. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Jan;61:57–66. doi: 10.1037/h0048851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. COLLIER G., WILLIS F. N. Deprivation and reinforcement. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Oct;62:377–384. doi: 10.1037/h0047144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CONRAD D. G., SIDMAN M., HERRNSTEIN R. J. The effects of deprivation upon temporally spaced responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Jan;1:59–65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Capaldi E., Sheffer J. D., Pulley R. J. Contrast effects in flavour preference learning. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1989 Aug;41(3):307–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dougan J. D. Inelastic supply: An economic approach to simple interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):415–429. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dougan J. D., McSweeney F. K. Variation in Herrnstein's r(o) as a function of alternative reinforcement rate. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Mar;43(2):215–223. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans W. O. A titration schedule on a treadmill. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):219–221. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fedorchak P. M., Bolles R. C. Hunger enhances the expression of calorie- but not taste-mediated conditioned flavor preferences. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1987 Jan;13(1):73–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hursh S. R., Raslear T. G., Shurtleff D., Bauman R., Simmons L. A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):419–440. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lucas G. A., Timberlake W. Negative anticipatory contrast and preference conditioning: flavor cues support preference conditioning, and environmental cues support contrast. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Jan;18(1):34–40. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.18.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McDowell J. J., Wood H. M. Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Changes in Herrnstein's k as a function of changes in reinforcer magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):183–192. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McSweeney F. K., Hinson J. M. Patterns of responding within sessions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):19–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rozin P., Kalat J. W. Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learning. Psychol Rev. 1971 Nov;78(6):459–486. doi: 10.1037/h0031878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Silberberg A., Warren-Boulton F. R., Asano T. Maximizing present value: A model to explain why moderate response rates obtain on variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):331–338. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Timberlake W. Behavior regulation and learned performance: Some misapprehensions and disagreements. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 May;41(3):355–375. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Timberlake W., Gawley D. J., Lucas G. A. Time horizons in rats foraging for food in temporally separated patches. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1987 Jul;13(3):302–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Timberlake W., Gawley D. J., Lucas G. A. Time horizons in rats: the effect of operant control of access to future food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):405–417. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Timberlake W., Peden B. F. On the distinction between open and closed economies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):35–60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Warren-Boulton F. R., Silberberg A., Gray M., Ollom R. Reanalysis of the equation for simple action. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Mar;43(2):265–277. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Williams B. A. The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 May;35(3):293–310. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES