Abstract
Six experiments were performed to explore the necessary and sufficient conditions for producing context specificity of discriminative operant performance in pigeons. In Experiment 1, pigeons learned a successive discrimination (red S+/blue S−) in two chambers that had a particular odor present and between which they were frequently switched. The birds subsequently learned the reversal (blue S+/ red S−) in one of these chambers with a different odor present. When switched to the alternative chamber, although the odor and the reinforcement contingency were still appropriate to the reversal, performance appropriate to the original discrimination recurred in subjects for which the houselights were on during training and testing but not for those for which the houselights were off. This indicated the importance of visual contextual cues in producing context specificity. Experiment 2 showed that the frequent switching between boxes in initial training was of no consequence, presumably because the apparatus cues were highly salient to the subjects. Experiment 3 showed significantly less context specificity when odor cues were omitted. Experiment 4 showed that simply using a different reinforced stimulus in each phase of training was ineffective in producing context specificity. Experiment 5 showed that the generalization test procedure used in Experiment 4 was sensitive to context specificity when discrimination-reversal training was used with different odors in the two training phases. Experiment 6 replicated the results of Experiment 4, but then showed that when different odors accompanied the two training phases, context specificity was obtained with the single-stimulus paradigm. Thus in both single-stimulus and discrimination-reversal paradigms, redundant odor cues potentiated learning about apparatus cues.
Keywords: context specificity, discrimination learning, reversal learning, odor cues, potentiation, contextual stimuli, recency effect, generalization testing, key peck, pigeons
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Galef B. G., Jr, Osborne B. Novel taste facilitation of the association of visual cues with toxicosis in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1978 Oct;92(5):907–916. doi: 10.1037/h0077531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holder M. D., Bermudez-Rattoni F., Garcia J. Taste-potentiated noise-illness associations. Behav Neurosci. 1988 Jun;102(3):363–370. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.102.3.363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas D. R., Empedocles S. Context specificity of operant discrimination performance in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 May;55(3):267–274. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas D. R., Stengel T., Sherman L., Woodford M. Factors affecting conditional discrimination learning by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):277–287. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]