Skip to main content
Bentham Open Access logoLink to Bentham Open Access
. 2024 Oct 17;33(9):1730–1758. doi: 10.2174/0109298673327175240929222308

Citrullination Accompanies the Development of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques

Anastasia Kanonykina 1, Elena Velikanova 1, Victoria Markova 1, Leo Bogdanov 1, Daria Shishkova 1, Amin Shabaev 1, Maxim Sinitsky 1, Anna Sinitskaya 1, Alyona Poddubnyak 1, Anastasia Lazebnaya 1, Alexander Stepanov 1, Arina Tyurina 1, Arseniy Lobov 2, Bozhana Zainullina 3, Arseniy Yuzhalin 1, Anton Kutikhin 1,*
PMCID: PMC13223441  PMID: 39421992

Abstract

Background

Citrullination represents a post-translational modification primarily mediated by peptidylarginine deiminase (PADI) 2 and 4 and resulting in the conversion of positively charged peptidylarginine to neutrally charged peptidylcitrulline. Molecular consequences of citrullination include the generation of neoepitopes which provoke the production of autoantibodies implicated in the development of autoimmune diseases. As citrullination initiates, promotes, and is enhanced by aseptic inflammation which plays a pivotal role in atherosclerosis, we proposed that citrullination might accompany the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease.

Objective

To investigate features and patterns of citrullination in atherosclerotic plaques.

Methods

We collected carotid atherosclerotic plaques (n = 14) and adjacent arterial segments (n = 14) which were pairwise excised during the carotid endarterectomy. The tissues were examined employing proteomic profiling (ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis), haematoxylin and eosin staining, Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining for peptidylcitrulline, PADI2, and PADI4, and gene expression analysis. To better explore the mechanisms of citrullination in the neointima, we have also stained excised plaques for the extracellular vesicle markers (CD9 and CD81) and assessed co-localisation of PADI2 (a citrullination marker) with CD81 (an extracellular vesicle marker). In order to study the systemic response to citrullination in an atherosclerotic vascular disease setting, we measured the level of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in the serum of patients with ischaemic stroke and healthy volunteers.

Results

Proteomic profiling found 213 plaque-specific and 111 intact arteria-specific proteins, as well as 46 proteins and 13 proteins which have been respectively upregulated or downregulated in plaques as compared with the adjacent intact segments. Among the top 20 upregulated proteins were atherogenic apolipoprotein B-100, iron-associated protein haptoglobin, and matrix metal-loproteinase-9, together indicating the advanced stage of plaque progression. In comparison with the intact arterial segments, plaques demonstrated protein signatures of innate immune response and oxidative stress, suggesting aseptic inflammation as a driver of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Both peptidylcitrulline and PADI2 have been abundant in the neointima but negligible in tunica media; further, the levels of peptidylcitrulline, PADI2, and PADI4 were elevated in plaque lysates in comparison with those from adjacent arterial segments (p = 0.025, 0.025, and 0.010, respectively). Notably, PADI2 and peptidylcitrulline were co-localised with the cells in the neointima and a considerable proportion of PADI2 was co-localised with CD81-positive extracellular vesicles (p = 0.003). Albeit citrullinated histone H3 and myeloperoxidase showed higher signal in the neointima than in tunica media (p = 0.048 and 0.023, respectively), we did not observe any signs of neutrophil extracellular traps (e.g., unwound chromatin or co-localisation of citrullinated histone H3 with neutrophil elastase) in the plaque tissue. Serum anti-citrullinated protein antibodies were not elevated in patients with ischaemic stroke (p = 0.71), suggesting that vascular citrullination likely does not trigger a generalised immune response.

Conclusion

The development of carotid atherosclerosis is associated with citrullination, although it represents a local rather than systemic phenomenon in this clinical scenario.

Keywords: atherosclerosis, neointima, carotid artery, citrullination, neutrophils, PADI2, PADI4, peptidylcitrulline

1. INTRODUCTION

Protein citrullination is a post-translational modification catalysed by enzymes known as peptidylarginine deiminases (PADIs), which are a family of 5 Ca2+-dependent enzymes (PADI1, PADI2, PADI3, PADI4, and PADI6) that catalyze the hydrolysis of guanidino group of the arginine side chain to an ureido group, resulting in the conversion of arginine to citrulline [1] (Fig. S1 (18.7MB, pdf) ). Unlike positively charged peptidyl-arginine, peptidylcitrulline has a neutral charge; therefore, the biological significance of citrullination is altering protein hydrophobicity and conformation. In turn, conformational changes result in the emergence of neoepitopes inducing the generation of autoantibodies which provoke inflammation [2]. Citrullination has been implicated in rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, and cancer [3-6]. The inflammatory response is a key trigger in the development of atherosclerosis as well as in the instability and rupture of the atherosclerotic plaque [7-9]. Pro-inflammatory endothelial activation impairs endothelial-dependent vasoactive mechanisms and provokes acute coronary events in patients with stable angina even without obstructive coronary stenosis and contributes to the plaque rupture, having been affected by epigenetic modifications [7-9].

Studies connecting citrullination and cardiovascular disease (CVD), including atherosclerosis, are sparse, and its role in the pathophysiology remains unclear [2]. One consequence of citrullination for cardiovascular pathophysiology is the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), a process determined by citrullination of histones, ejection of uncondensed chromatin from neutrophils, and decoration of released chromatin with antimicrobial proteins such as neutrophil elastase (NE/ELA2) or myeloperoxidase (MPO). In the blood vessels, NETs act as a pro-thrombotic scaffold causing adhesion, activation, and aggregation of platelets and adsorbing blood coagulation factors [10-14], whereas administration of DNases [11, 13, 14] and heparin [14] or PAD4 knockout [12] can inhibit NETosis and thrombosis. NETs are involved in the development of deep vein thrombosis [10, 12-14], chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension [11], ischemia-related coronary microvascular obstruction [15], atherosclerosis [16], and atherothrombosis [16]. Increased serum complexes of MPO and DNA (NET marker) were associated with atherosclerosis and an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events [17].

Citrullinated proteins and NETs have been detected in atherosclerotic plaques [18, 19], but the functional mechanisms remain elusive. NETosis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic mice [20], and the release of NETs by neutrophils primes macrophages for cytokine production in atherosclerotic plaques [21]. NETs were identified in the scaffolds of coronary thrombi and thrombotic NET burden correlated with infarct size [16]. Neutrophils and NETs correlated with ruptured or eroded but not intact plaques, having been found in thrombi and haemorrhages as well as in the perivascular adipose tissue adjacent to the injured arteries [22], and this correlation could be due to the activity of the extracellular histone H4 [23]. Likewise, inhibition of PADs abrogated NETosis and reduced both vascular infiltration and atherosclerotic burden in ApoE-knockout mice [24], and neutralization of histone H4 prevented vascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction and atherosclerotic lesion destabilisation [23].

Citrullinated histone H3 can induce endothelial dysfunction, a process underlying the early stages of atherosclerosis [25]. Similarly, NETs provoked an increased production of MMP-2 by endothelial cells suggestive of endothelial dysfunction [26]. Activated endothelial cells promoted NETosis in an interleukin-8-dependent manner and were additionally damaged by NETs expelled during their co-culture with neutrophils [27, 28]. These findings suggest that citrullinated proteins may be a prerequisite of plaque formation by inducing endothelial dysfunction, vascular smooth muscle cell activation, and extracellular matrix remodelling [29-33]. Yet, most of the studies focused on the role of NETs on sequelae of plaque development (e.g., plaque erosion and rupture together resulting in atherothrombosis) and on the composition of NET-associated proteins within the thrombi, rather than on investigating citrullination within the atherosclerotic plaque. Hence, there is no direct evidence that could establish a pathophysiological paradigm linking citrullination with atherosclerosis development.

Here, we interrogated human atherosclerotic plaques for citrullination signatures. Immunostaining demonstrated that peptidylcitrulline and PADI2 are almost exclusively present in the atherosclerotic tissue but not in the intact tunica media. Citrullinated histone H3 and myeloperoxidase were also overrepresented in the neointima, although NETs have not been clearly visualised. Protein profiling also showed elevated levels of peptidylcitrulline, PADI2, and PADI4 in atherosclerotic plaques compared to the adjacent arterial segments. PADI2 and peptidylcitrulline were co-localised with the cells in the neointima; moreover, PADI2 was co-localised with an extracellular vesicle marker CD81 [34-39]. Serum levels of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) did not differ in patients with ischaemic stroke and healthy volunteers indicating that citrullination is a local but not systemic phenomenon. Collectively, our results advocate the pathophysiological relevance of citrullination for the development of atherosclerosis and furnish a rationale for the more frequent use of non-specific anti-inflammatory therapies in the prevention of ischaemic events.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

This section contains Brief Materials and Methods applied to perform the experiments. Detailed Materials and Methods are provided in the Supplementary Files.

2.1. Patients and Samples

Carotid atherosclerotic plaques (n = 14) and adjacent arterial segments (n = 14) were pairwise excised during the carotid endarterectomy from 14 patients admitted to the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases (Kemerovo, Russia). The collection of clinical specimens was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases (ethical approval code 25/2021, date of approval: 02 September 2021), and written informed consent has been provided by all study participants after receiving a full explanation of the study’s purposes. The investigation was carried out in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice and the latest revision of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013). Criteria of inclusion were: 1) performance of carotid endarterectomy due to chronic brain ischemia or ischemic stroke; 2) a signed written informed consent to be enrolled. A criterion of exclusion was incomplete investigation regardless of the reason; in this case, we enrolled another subject with similar age, gender and clinicopathological features who met the inclusion criteria. The clinicopathological features of the patients are presented in Table 1. Detailed information on diagnostics of these features is indicated in Detailed Materials and Methods.

Table 1.

Clinicopathological features of the patients enrolled on the study.

Pairwise collected carotid atherosclerotic plaques and adjacent intact arterial segments (n = 14)
Male gender (n, %) 9/14 (64.3%)
Age (median ± interquartile range) 66.0 (59.50 – 70.25)
Ischemic stroke (n, %) 4/14 (28.6%)
Arterial hypertension (n, %) 14/14 (100.0%)
Past medical history of myocardial infarction (n, %) 5/14 (35.7%)
Chronic heart failure (n, %) 13/14 (92.8%)
Chronic coronary syndrome (n, %) 12/14 (85.7%)
Past medical history of stroke (n, %) 4/14 (28.6%)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (n, %) 5/14 (35.7%)
Smoking (n, %) 7/14 (50.0%)
Chronic kidney disease (n, %) 1/14 (7.1%)
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n, %) 5/14 (35.7%)
Overweight or obesity (n, %) 10/14 (71.4%)
Body mass index (median ± interquartile range) 27.61 (24.28 – 31.13)
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (CKD-EPI 2021, median ± interquartile range) 69.50 (59.50 – 95.00)
Left ventricular ejection fraction (median ± interquartile range) 65.50 (63.00 – 69.00)
Percent stenosis (median ± interquartile range) 77.50 (70.00 – 84.00)
Antiplatelet drugs 11/14 (71.4%)
Beta-blockers 13/14 (92.8%)
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 9/14 (64.3%)
Statins 9/14 (64.3%)
Nitrates 1/14 (7.1%)
Angiotensin receptor II blockers 6/14 (42.8%)
Aldosterone antagonists 2/14 (14.2%)
Calcium channel blockers 3/14 (21.4%)
Diuretics 1/14 (7.1%)
Anticoagulants 2/14 (14.2%)

For serum measurements, we used the samples collected in our previous study (44 serum samples from asymptomatic blood donors and 44 serum samples from patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy because of ischaemic stroke [40] and the respective commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit which quantitates anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs, KS-050, Omnix, Saint Petersburg, Russia). Colorimetric measurement of ACPAs was conducted according to the manufacturer’s protocol using a Multiskan Sky microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.2. Isolation of RNA and Total Protein

Upon the excision, atherosclerotic plaques were cut into 3 ring segments. Isolation and quantification of RNA and total protein were isolated as previously described [40, 41]. Upon the excision, atherosclerotic plaques were cut into 3 ring segments. The second and third segments as well as the pieces of the adjacent arterial segment were homogenised in TRIzol Reagent (15596018, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for RNA extraction or in T-PER Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (78510, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplied with Halt protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (78444, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for the total protein extraction according to the manufacturer’s protocols. With regards to the total protein extraction, two rounds of sample enrichment have been performed: initial centrifugation at 14,000 × g (Microfuge 20R, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) for 10 minutes and subsequent ultracentrifugation at 200,000 × g (Optima MAX-XP, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) for 1 hour to sediment insoluble supramolecular complexes. Quantification and quality control of the isolated RNA was performed employing Qubit 4 fluorometer (Q33238, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and respective consumables (Qubit RNA BR, Q10210; Qubit RNA IQ, Q33222; Qubit RNA IQ standards for calibration, Q33235; Qubit assay tubes, Q32856, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Quantification of total protein was conducted using BCA Protein Assay Kit (23227, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Multiskan Sky microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.3. Proteomic Profiling

Sample preparation and shotgun proteomics analysis have been conducted as previously described [42-47]. Bioinformatic analysis was also conducted as previously described [48-61]. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [48] partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD035173.

Upon the removal of T-PER Buffer by acetone precipitation (650501, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), the protein pellet was resuspended in 8 mol/L urea (U5128, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) diluted in 50 mmol/L ammonium bicarbonate (09830, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The protein concentration was measured by Qubit 4 fluorometer (Q33238, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with QuDye Protein Quantification Kit (25102, Lumiprobe, Moscow, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Protein samples (10 μg) were then incubated in 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol (D0632, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for 1 hour at 37°C with the subsequent incubation in 15 mmol/L iodoacetamide for 30 minutes in the dark at room temperature (I1149, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Next, the samples were supplied with 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol, immediately diluted with 7 volumes of 50 mmol/L ammonium bicarbonate and incubated for 16 hours at 37°C with 200 ng of trypsin (1:50 trypsin: protein ratio; VA9000, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The peptides were then frozen at −80°C for 1 hour and desalted with stage tips (Tips-RPS-M.T2.200.96, Affinisep, Le Houlme, France), according to the manufacturer’s protocol using methanol (1880092500, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), acetonitrile (1000291000, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and 0.1% formic acid (33015, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Desalted peptides were dried in a centrifuge concentrator (Concentrator plus, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 3 hours and finally dissolved in 20 µL 0.1% formic acid for further shotgun proteomics analysis.

Approximately 500 ng of peptides were used for shotgun proteomics analysis by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis with ion mobility (UHPLC-MS/MS) in TimsToF Pro mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) with nanoElute UHPLC system (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). UHPLC was performed in the two-column separation mode with Acclaim PepMap 5 mm Trap Cartridge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Bruker Ten separation column (C18 ReproSil AQ, 100 mm × 0.75 mm, 1.9 µm, 120 A; Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) in a gradient mode with 500 nL/min flow rate and 50°C. Phase A was water/0.1% formic acid, phase B was acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid. The gradient was from 2% to 30% phase B for 16 minutes, then to 38% phase B for 5 minutes and to 95% phase B for 3 minutes with subsequent washing with 95% phase B for 6 minutes. Before each sample, trap and separation columns were equilibrated with 10 and 4 column volumes, respectively. The captiveSpray ion source was used for electrospray ionization with 1600 V of capillary voltage, 3 L/min N2 flow, and 180°C source temperature.

The mass-spectrometry acquisition was performed in data-independent acquisition mode with trapped ion mobility spectroscopy (TIMS) in PASEF (parallel accumulation serial fragmentation) mode (diaPASEF) consisting of 5 cycles with 3 or 2 mobility windows each including a total of 13 mass width windows (50 Da width) covering the m/z range from 457.81 to 1046.80 and ion mobility range (1/K0) from 0.85 to 1.18 V s/cm2. The collision energy was programmed as a function of ion mobility, following a straight line from 20 eV for 1/K0 of 0.85V s/cm2 to 59 eV for 1/K0 of 1.3 V s/cm2.

Protein identification was performed in DIA-NN software (v. 1.8) using the human protein SwissProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/; accessed on 14 December 2021; organism: Human [9606]; uploaded on 2 March 2021; 20,394 sequences). Using the database, we performed library generation (library-free search) by the default DIA-NN settings. The generated library consisted of 20,338 proteins with 8,454,641 precursors. The search parameters were: parent mass and fragment mass error tolerance error 10 ppm, protein and peptide FDR < 1%, two possible missed cleavage sites, and proteins with ≥ 2 unique peptides. Cysteine carbamidomethylation was set as a fixed modification.

Label-free quantification by peak area under the curve was used for further analysis in R (version 3.6.1; R Core Team, 2019). All proteins presented in 12 of 14 biological replicates were identified and the groups were compared by the “VennDiagram” package [49] and drawing of the Venn diagram. The proteins with NA in > 2 samples were removed and the imputation of missed values by k-nearest neighbors was performed by the “impute” package [50]. Further, log-transformation and quantile normalization with further analysis of differential expression by the “limma” package [51] were performed. Finally, we performed clusterization of samples by partial least squares discriminant analysis in the “MixOmics” package [52]. “ggplot2” [53] and “pheatmap” [54] packages were used for visualisation. Reproducible code for data analysis is available from https://github.com/ArseniyLobov/Proteomic-profiling-of-atherosclerotic-plaques (accessed on 31 July 2022). Differentially expressed proteins were defined as those with logarithmic fold change ≥ 1 and false discovery rate-corrected p value ≤ 0.05. Bioinformatic analysis was performed using Gene Ontology [55, 56], Reactome [57, 58], UniProtKB Keywords [59], and Kyoto encyclopaedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) databases [60, 61].

2.4. Measurement of Gene and Protein Expression

Gene expression (CD9, CD63, CD81, PADI2, and PADI4 genes) was measured as previously described [40, 62-64]. RNA quantification was conducted as described above and was followed by a reverse transcription using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (4368814, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using customised primers (500 nmol/L each, Evrogen, Moscow, Russia), cDNA (20 ng), and PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (A25778, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ protocols. Primer sequences are provided in Table 2. Technical replicates (n = 3 per sample) were performed in all RT-qPCR experiments. The reaction was considered successful if its efficiency was 90-105% and R2 was ≥ 0.98. Quantification of CD9, CD63, CD81, PADI2 and PADI4 mRNA levels in carotid atherosclerotic plaques (n = 8) and adjacent intact arterial segments (n = 8) was performed by using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Relative transcript levels were expressed as a value relative to the average of 3 housekeeping genes (ACTB, GAPDH, B2M). A fresh sample of the human liver obtained from the patient who underwent liver transplantation was used as a positive control.

Table 2.

Sequences of customized primers for RT-qPCR.

Gene Forward primer sequence Reverse primer sequence
CD9 5′-CCTCACCATGCCGGTCAAAG-3′ 5′-GTCCAATGGCAAGGACAGCAA-3′
CD63 5′-TTGCTCTACGTCCTCCTGCTG-3′ 5′-CACCCACTGCGATGATGACC-3′
CD81 5′-ATTTCGTCTTCTGGCTGGCT-3′ 5′-CATCATGACAGCGCCCACAG-3′
PADI2 5′-GGGCTCTTCCTCACAGCCAT-3′ 5′-TCGGTCACAGTTCACCAGCA-3′
PADI4 5′-TGCCATCCTGCTGGTGAACT-3′ 5′-GGTCTTCGTGCTCAGGGTCA-3′
ACTB 5′-CATCGAGCACGGCATCGTCA-3′ 5′-TAGCACAGCCTGGACAGCAAC-3′
GAPDH 5′-AGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC-3′ 5′-GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC-3′
B2M 5′-TCCATCCGACATTGAAGTTG-3′ 5′-CGGCAGGCATACTCATCTT-3′

For measuring protein expression in carotid atherosclerotic plaques (n = 12) and adjacent arterial segments (n = 12), protein quantification, protein loading (15 μg per sample), separation, and transfer were performed as in [40, 41, 46]. Equal amounts of protein (15 μg per sample) were mixed with NuPAGE lithium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer (NP0007, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a 4:1 ratio and NuPAGE sample reducing agent (NP0009, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a 10:1 ratio, denatured at 99°C for 5 minutes and then loaded on a 1.5 mm NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris protein gel (NP0335BOX, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The 1:1 mixture of Novex Sharp pre-stained protein standard (LC5800, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and MagicMark XP Western protein standard (LC5602, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was loaded as a molecular weight marker. Proteins were separated by the sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) at 150 V for 2 hours using NuPAGE 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid SDS running buffer (NP0002, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), NuPAGE Antioxidant (NP0005, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and XCell SureLock Mini-Cell vertical mini-protein gel electrophoresis system (EI0001, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Protein transfer was performed using polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) transfer stacks (IB24001, Invitrogen) and iBlot 2 Gel Transfer Device (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocols using a standard transfer mode for 30–150 kDa proteins (P0—20 V for 1 minute, 23 V for 4 minutes, and 25 V for 2 minutes). PVDF membranes were then incubated in iBind Flex Solution (SLF2020, Solution Kit Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 1 hour to prevent non-specific binding.

Blots were probed with rabbit antibodies to PADI2 (1:500, ab183194, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or mouse antibodies to PADI4 (1:500, H00023569-M01, Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA), peptidylcitrulline (1:500, MABN328, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, loading control, 1:250, ab139416, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (7074, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) or goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (AP130P, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) were used at 1:200 and 1:1000 dilution, respectively. Incubation with the antibodies was performed using iBind Flex Solution Kit (SLF2020, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), iBind Flex Cards (SLF2010, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and iBind Flex Western Device (SLF2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) during 3 h according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Chemiluminescent detection was performed using SuperSignal West Pico PLUS chemiluminescent substrate (34580, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and C-DiGit blot scanner (LI-COR Biosciences, Linkoln, NE, USA) in a high-sensitivity mode (12-min scanning). To properly assess the protein loading, we conducted total protein normalization using 0.1% Fast Green FCF, a protein-specific dye (F8130, Solarbio Life Sciences, Beijing, China), and Odyssey XF imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) in a 600 nm channel (520 nm excitation and 600 nm emission). Densitometry was performed as in [65] using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) using the standard algorithm (consecutive selection and plotting of the lanes with the measurement of the peak area) and subsequent adjustment to the total protein loading in the respective lanes.

2.5. H&E Staining and Immunostaining

The ring segments of atherosclerotic plaques were snap-frozen in the optimal cutting temperature compound (Tissue-Tek, 4583, Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan) using liquid nitrogen and were then sectioned on a cryostat (Microm HM 525, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as in our previous studies [40, 66]. To ensure the proper immunofluorescence examination, we prepared 8 sections (7 µm thickness), evenly distributed across the entire carotid artery segment, per slide. Sections were then stained with haematoxylin and eosin (ab245880, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and visualised by light microscopy (AxioImager.A1 microscope and EC Plan-Neofluar 20×/0.50 or EC Plan-Neofluar 40×/0.75 M27 objectives, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). For the immunofluorescence staining, the sections were fixed in ice-cold acetone (6-09-20-03-83, EKOS-1, Moscow, Russia) for 10 minutes and blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin (Р091Е, PanEco, Moscow, Russia) for 1 hour to prevent non-specific binding. Sections were then incubated for 16 hours at 4°C with the following antibodies:

  1. Mouse antibodies to peptidylcitrulline (1:250, MABN328, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) in combination with rabbit antibodies to PADI2 (1:100, ab183194, Abcam, Cambridge, UK);

  2. Mouse antibodies to peptidylcitrulline (1:250, MABN328, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) in combination with rabbit antibodies to CD9 (1:50, NBP2-67310, Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA);

  3. Rabbit antibodies to PADI2 (1:100, ab183194, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in combination with mouse antibodies to CD81 (1:100, NBP1-44861, Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA);

  4. Rabbit antibodies to citrullinated histone H3 (1:500, NB100-57135; Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA) in combination with mouse antibodies to NE/ELA2 (1:50, MAB91671-100, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA);

  5. Rabbit antibodies to MPO (1:100, ab208670, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) as a single stain.

The next day, sections were further treated with donkey anti-rabbit or anti-mouse pre-adsorbed Alexa Fluor-488-conjugated (1:500, ab150061 or ab150109, Abcam, Cam-bridge, UK) and donkey anti-rabbit or anti-mouse pre-adsorbed Alexa Fluor-555-conjugated (1:500, ab150062 or ab150110, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (10 μg/mL, D9542, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Between all steps excluding blocking of non-specific binding, washing was performed thrice with 0.1% phosphate-buffered saline (60201, Pushchino Laboratories, Pushchino, Russia) solution of Tween-20 (P9416, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Coverslips were mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade (P36934, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Slides were examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM 700, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Semi-quantitative analysis of signal intensity in confocal images and co-localisation analysis were performed using the respective ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) plugins (Colour Histogram, Colocalisation Threshold and Coloc2) upon the correction for the background signal obtained from the negative control images. To evaluate the co-localisation, we calculated Pearson's r above threshold (zero-zero pixels), thresholded Mander's split co-localisation coefficient (the proportion of signal in each channel that co-localizes with the other channel) for both (red and green) channels, percent volume co-localised with each channel, and intensity volume above threshold co-localised with each channel in both neointima and media.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). For descriptive statistics, data were presented as median, 25th and 75th percentiles (interquartile range), and range (the distance between minimum and maximum values). Two independent groups were compared by the Mann–Whitney U-test. The p values ≤ 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

To perform an objective analysis of protein citrullination in atherosclerotic plaques, we collected 14 atherosclerotic plaques and adjacent arterial segments excised during carotid endarterectomy (Fig. 1A) and profiled them using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis (UHPLC-MS/MS). Partial least-squares discriminant analysis (Fig. 1B) and dendrogram (Fig. 1C) indicated clusterisation of the samples, as 213 plaque-specific and 111 intact arteria-specific proteins have been identified. Further, 46 proteins were upregulated (fold change ≥ 2 and FDR-adjusted p value ≤ 0.05) and 13 proteins were downregulated (fold change ≤ 0.5 and FDR-adjusted p value ≤ 0.05) in plaques in comparison with the adjacent arterial segments. The top 20 proteins overexpressed in plaques included catalytic lipid-associated bioscavenger paraoxonase 1, atherogenic apolipoprotein B-100, iron-associated protein haptoglobin, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (Fig. 1D). Taken together, these findings demonstrated the different molecular portfolios of plaques and adjacent arterial segments included in further examination, indicating the advanced stage of plaque progression.

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of 14 atherosclerotic plaques and adjacent arterial segments collected during the carotid endarterectomy. (A) Gross examination of the specimen. Plaque and adjacent arterial segment are demarcated by red and blue contour, respectively; (B) Partial-least squares discriminant analysis demonstrates two separate clusters delineating the significant differences between plaques and adjacent arterial segments; (C) Heatmap of top differentially expressed proteins in plaques (orange) and intact tissue (i.e., adjacent arterial segments) confirming clear clusterisation of plaque and near-plaque proteomic profiles; (D) Among the top 20 proteins overexpressed in plaques are catalytic lipid-associated bioscavenger paraoxonase 1, atherogenic apolipoprotein B-100, iron-associated protein haptoglobin, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 all indicative of advanced atherosclerosis.

Bioinformatics analysis of proteins which were classified as specific or upregulated in plaques and adjacent arterial segments revealed that both of these sample groups showed active immune response and particularly response to bacteria manifested as complement activation (complement activation: 10 DEPs in plaques and 11 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 5.85 and 13.36, respectively; defense response to bacterium: 14 DEPs in plaques and 14 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 3.12 and 6.47, respectively; regulation of complement cascade: 13 DEPs in plaques and 10 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 9.62 and 15.34, respectively; initial triggering of complement: 10 DEPs in plaques and 6 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 9.57 and 11.91, respectively; complement cascade: 14 DEPs in plaques and 10 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 9.49 and 14.06, respectively), phagocytosis (phagocytosis, engulfment: 10 DEPs in plaques and 12 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 6.21 and 15.46, respectively; phagocytosis, recognition: 8 DEPs in plaques and 11 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 6.14 and 17.51, respectively; phagocytosis: 15 DEPs in plaques and 15 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 3.08 and 1.49, respectively, endocytosis: 21 DEPs in plaques and 15 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 3.29 and 4.88, respectively, role of phospholipids in phagocytosis: 11 DEPs in plaques and 6 DEPs in the intact arterial segments; fold change: 10.17 and 11.51, respectively), and neutrophil activation (neutrophil degranulation: 19 DEPs in plaques and 15 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 3.24 and 5.31, respectively) (Tables S1 (18.7MB, pdf) , S2 (18.7MB, pdf) ). Both tissue types also showed protein signatures of active extracellular vesicle production (vesicle-mediated transport: 43 DEPs in plaques and 23 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 2.60 and 2.88, respectively; secretory granule lumen: 20 DEPs in plaques and 12 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 5.09 and 6.33, respectively; extracellular vesicle: 76 DEPs in plaques and 39 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 2.91 and 3.10, respectively; secretory granule: 30 DEPs in plaques and 18 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 2.79 and 3.47, respectively, secretory vesicle: 32 DEPs in plaques and 18 DEPs in the intact arterial segments, fold change: 2.50 and 2.91, respectively) (Tables S1 (18.7MB, pdf) , S3 (18.7MB, pdf) ). Plaques were notable for the abundance of molecular categories related to innate immune response (activation of innate immune response: 8 DEPs, fold change: 8.24; acute inflammatory response: 8 DEPs, fold change: 8.04; inflammatory response: 19 DEPs, fold change: 2.93), oxidative stress (respiratory burst involved in defense response: 4 DEPs, fold change: 40.69; respiratory burst: 4 DEPs, fold change: 13.02; response to oxygen-containing compound: 39 DEPs, fold change: 2.08; regulation of TLR by endogenous ligand: 4 DEPs, fold change: 15.50; interferon signaling: 9 DEPs, fold change: 3.72; NF-κB binding: 5 DEPs, fold change: 12.72), biosynthetic processes including translation and transcription (translation: 17 DEPs, fold change: 3.67; peptide biosynthetic process: 17 DEPs, fold change: 3.42; amide biosynthetic process: 18 DEPs, fold change: 2.82; cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process: 23 DEPs, fold change: 2.45; regulation of cellular component biogenesis: 28 DEPs, fold change: 2.38; eukaryotic translation initiation: 7 DEPs, fold change: 4.79; eukaryotic translation elongation: 6 DEPs, fold change: 5.19; eukaryotic translation termination: 6 DEPs, fold change: 5.25; translation regulator activity: 9 DEPs, fold change: 4.92; transcription coactivator activity: 13 DEPs, fold change: 3.76), coagulation (regulation of coagulation: 6 DEPs, fold change: 6.60; platelet degranulation: 10 DEPs, fold change: 6.41; platelet activation, signaling and aggregation: 12 DEPs, fold change: 3.76) and regulated cell death (positive regulation of cell death: 20 DEPs, fold change: 2.81) (Tables S1 (18.7MB, pdf) , S2 (18.7MB, pdf) , and S4 (18.7MB, pdf) ). In contrast, adjacent arterial segments displayed fingerprints of B cell activation (positive regulation of B cell activation: 10 DEPs, fold change: 9.93, immunoglobulin production: 7 DEPs, fold change: 7.38) and adaptive immune response (lymphocyte mediated immunity: 13 DEPs, fold change: 8.85; positive regulation of lymphocyte activation: 13 DEPs, fold change: 5.35; adaptive immune response: 19 DEPs, fold change: 4.92) (Table S1 (18.7MB, pdf) ).

To assess the amounts and localisation of NETs and leukocyte infiltrations, we conducted haematoxylin and eosin staining of 12 plaques (3 consecutive sections per each). We have not found uncondensed chromatin in any of the samples regardless of the section (Fig. 2) but have revealed severe leukocyte infiltration near the microvessels, calcifications, and at the border between neointima and tunica media (Fig. 2). Within the neointima, we have detected microvessels variable in size and shape (Fig. S2 (18.7MB, pdf) ). Calcifications were observed at the border between neointima and tunica media and have been often located in close vicinity to leukocyte infiltrations (Fig. S3 (18.7MB, pdf) ). Leukocyte amount near blood vessels and calcifications (Fig. S4A (18.7MB, pdf) ) was lower than at the border between the intima and tunica media (Fig. S4B (18.7MB, pdf) ) where leukocytes could coalesce into clusters (Fig. S4C (18.7MB, pdf) ).

Fig. (2).

Fig. (2)

Staining of atherosclerotic plaques with haematoxylin and eosin shows the leukocyte infiltrations near the microvessels (top), calcifications (middle), and at the neointima-media border (bottom). Overview images: magnification: ×1.6, scale bar: 1000 µm; close-ups demarcated by blue, green, and gold contour: magnification: ×200, scale bar: 100 µm; close-ups demarcated by red contour: magnification: ×400, scale bar: 50 µm.

We next asked whether carotid plaques are enriched with peptidylcitrulline, PADI2, and PADI4 as compared with adjacent arterial segments. Western blotting measurements performed in 12 pairwise collected plaques and intact arteries found a statistically significant increase in peptidylcitrulline, PADI4 and PADI2 in plaques, and PADI4 prevailed over PADI2 as indicated by elevated PADI4 to PADI2 ratio (Figs. 3A and B). However, plaques were devoid of PADI2 mRNA and PADI4 mRNA was also expressed in negligible amounts, although PADI4 was highly expressed in the liver (Table 3). Genes encoding extracellular vesicle markers (CD9, CD63, and CD81) have shown notable expression in plaque lysate, confirming the technical validity of the assay (Table 3). Hence, PADI2 and PADI4 might be delivered to the carotid plaques via systemic circulation.

Fig. (3).

Fig. (3)

Western blotting profiling of carotid atherosclerotic plaques and adjacent arterial segments. (A) Representative Western blots of plaques (P) and adjacent arterial segments (I) probed for peptidylcitrulline (PepCit), PADI4, PADI2, or GAPDH (top), loading control was performed by GAPDH blotting and total protein normalisation (bottom); (B) Semi-quantitative image analysis of abovementioned Western blots by means of densitometry (with respect to the total protein normalisation); the results are provided after the adjustment of specific signal for the total protein loading. Blue and red dots indicate intact arterial segments and plaques, respectively. Each dot on the plots represents the measurement from one sample (n = 12 samples per group). Whiskers indicate the range, box bounds indicate the 25th–75th percentiles, and centre lines indicate the median. p values are provided above boxes, Mann–Whitney U test.

Table 3.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) profiling of atherosclerotic plaques and adjacent arterial segments. Shown are genes encoding the proteins which are enriched in extracellular vesicles (CD9, CD63, and CD81) and peptidylarginine deiminases (PADI2 and PADI4). Gene expression has been measured as ΔCt values.

Sample CD9, ΔCt CD63, ΔCt CD81, ΔCt PADI2, ΔCt PADI4, ΔCt
Atherosclerotic plaques
1 0,061 0,184 0,118 - 0,0002
2 0,028 0,034 0,015 - 0,0002
3 0,045 0,046 0,016 - 0,0001
4 - 0,116 0,035 - -
5 0,263 0,115 0,094 - -
6 0,055 0,132 0,131 - 0,0004
7 0,040 0,085 0,127 - 0,0000
8 0,061 0,113 0,077 - 0,0015
Mean ΔCt 0,079 0,103 0,077 - 0,0004
Adjacent arterial segments
1 0,035 0,036 0,042 - 0,0002
2 0,054 0,039 0,013 - 0,0002
3 0,032 0,021 0,014 - 0,0003
4 0,100 0,081 0,060 - 0,0028
5 - 0,088 0,055 - -
6 0,122 0,414 0,271 - 0,0007
7 0,027 0,083 0,069 - 0,0005
8 0,081 - 0,024 - -
Mean ΔCt 0,065 0,109 0,069 - 0,0008
Liver
ΔCt 0,001 0,645 0,112 0,001 0,658

To verify these results, we focused on plaque segments which contained neointima and a few layers of intact tunica media and stained them for PADI2, peptidylcitrulline, citrullinated histone H3, NE/ELA2, and extracellular vesicle markers CD9 and CD81. Strikingly, both PADI2 and peptidylcitrulline were exclusively detected in the neointima but not tunica media (Fig. 4A) and citrullinated histone H3 was considerably upregulated in the neointima, although it was also observed in tunica media (Fig. 4B, S5 (18.7MB, pdf) , S6 (18.7MB, pdf) ). Citrullinated histone H3 was not associated with NE/ELA2 and shapeless, uncondensed chromatin (a feature of NETs) has not been revealed (Fig. 4B, S5 (18.7MB, pdf) , S6 (18.7MB, pdf) ). Peptidylcitrulline has not been associated with the extracellular vesicles (Fig. 4C) whilst PADI2 was largely co-localised with CD81 in the neointima (Fig. 4D). In accordance with the aforementioned findings, CD81-positive regions in the tunica media were devoid of PADI2 (Fig. 4D).

Fig. (4).

Fig. (4)

Immunofluorescence staining of neointima and adjacent tunica media for: (A) PADI2 (red colour) and peptidylcitrulline (green colour); (B) citrullinated histone H3 (red colour) and neutrophil elastase (green colour); (C) CD9 (red colour) and peptidylcitrulline (green colour); (D) PADI2 (red colour) and CD81 (green colour). Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue colour). Two representative images per staining are provided. Negative controls (i.e., sections stained with species-specific fluorescent-labelled secondary antibodies and DAPI but without the respective antigen-specific primary antibodies) are provided to the right from representative images. Magnification: ×400, scale bar: 50 µm. Note that PADI2, peptidylcitrulline, and citrullinated histone H3 are abundant in the neointima but absent or downregulated in the tunica media. In contrast to peptidylcitrulline, a large proportion of PADI2 is co-localised with CD81-positive cells or extracellular vesicles (yellow colour formed by co-localisation of red and green colours).

Albeit some of the plaque regions contained considerable amounts of neutrophil and macrophage marker MPO in the neointima but not in tunica media (Fig. 5A), there has been no colocalisation of MPO and CD81, which was abundantly expressed in the medial layer (Fig. 5B, S7). However, we did not find any complexes of unwound chromatin which could indicate NETs, in agreement with the findings from haematoxylin and eosin staining.

Fig. (5).

Fig. (5)

Immunofluorescence staining of neointima and adjacent tunica media for (A) neutrophil and macrophage marker MPO (red colour); (B) MPO and CD81, a tetraspanin enriched in extracellular vesicles but also expressed on cell membranes. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue colour). Two representative images per staining are provided. Negative controls (i.e., sections stained with species-specific fluorescent-labelled secondary antibodies and DAPI but without antigen-specific antibody to MPO) are provided to the right from representative images. Magnification: ×400, scale bar: 50 µm. Note that MPO is significantly upregulated in the neointima as compared with the tunica media.

Semi-quantitative analysis of signal intensity and co-localisation analysis of confocal images found statistically significant overexpression of PADI2, citrullinated histone H3, and myeloperoxidase in the neointima as compared to tunica media (Fig. 6A). Irrespective of the tool for co-localisation assessment, from 70 to 90% of PADI2 was co-localised with CD81, a tetraspanin enriched in extracellular vesicles, suggesting a mechanism by which cells can regulate citrullination in the pathological environment (Fig. 6B).

Fig. (6).

Fig. (6)

Semi-quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence staining of neointima and adjacent tunica media. (A) Comparison of signal intensity (measured in ImageJ in arbitrary units) by using the Colour Histogram plugin, blue and red dots indicate tunica media and neointima, respectively. (B) Analysis of PADI2 and CD81 colocalisation (ImageJ) by Colocalisation Threshold and Coloc2 plugins. Each dot on the plots represents the measurement from one image. Whiskers indicate the range, box bounds indicate the 25th–75th percentiles, and centre lines indicate the median. p values are provided above boxes, Mann–Whitney U test.

Finally, we measured the level of ACPAs in the serum from asymptomatic blood donors (n = 44) and patients with ischaemic stroke (n = 44). Although protein citrullination was evident in carotid plaques, serum ACPAs have not been augmented (Fig. 7), assuming citrullination as a local but not systemic phenomenon in patients with carotid atherosclerosis.

Fig. (7).

Fig. (7)

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of serum ACPAs in healthy volunteers and patients with ischaemic stroke. Each dot on the plot represents the measurement from one subject. Whiskers indicate the range, box bounds indicate the 25th–75th percentiles, and centre lines indicate the median. p value is provided above boxes, Mann–Whitney U test.

4. DISCUSSION

Although it is estimated that human citrullinome encompasses as many as 250-300 proteins [67-75], the effects of citrullination in many organs and tissues are still poorly understood. Citrullination of histones plays an important role in the regulation of apoptosis [76] and differentiation [77] and is pivotal for the generation of NETs, complexes of decondensed citrullinated chromatin that are essential in the struggle with bacterial pathogens [78-80]. A number of the extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen [81-83], fibronectin [84-86] and fibrinogen [87-89], as well as cytoskeletal proteins tubulin [90, 91], vimentin [92, 93], and actin [94, 95] can also undergo citrullination.

Citrullination is among the primary mechanisms of autoimmune diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and multiple sclerosis) because the most important functional consequence of arginine-to-citrulline conversion is neoepitope formation [3-5, 96]. The pathophysiological importance of citrullination in rheumatoid arthritis is persuasively shown by ACPAs which are the gold standard for its diagnostics with a sensitivity from 60% (at the early stages) to 75% (at the late stages) and specificity > 90% [97, 98]. Immunostaining approaches demonstrated a higher prevalence of citrullinated proteins in the synovial sheath of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and muscles of patients with polymyositis in comparison with the corresponding healthy tissues [99]. Citrullinated proteins were also frequent in β-cells of pancreatic islets of diabetes-prone NOD mice [100] and areas of ongoing demyelination in patients with multiple sclerosis [101]. Taken together, these findings proposed that citrullination is an inflammation-associated rather than disease-associated protein modification. In keeping with this hypothesis, non-specific PAD inhibitor chloramidine suppressed inflammation by triggering apoptosis of immune cells in mice with dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis [102]. Moreover, murine collagen-induced arthritis was ameliorated by either chloramidine [103] or specific PADI4 inhibitor GSK199 [104]. Notably, inflammation also potentiates citrullination, as pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β and γ-interferon induced citrullination in rat pancreas [100] while non-selective anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g., glucocorticoids) reduced PADI4 expression and the amount of citrullinated proteins in joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis [105]. Such interconnection between citrullination and aseptic inflammation points out the role of the former in cardiovascular pathology largely driven by both innate and adaptive immunity [2, 31, 32, 106-111].

Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an elevated risk of subclinical atherosclerosis [112], major adverse cardiovascular events (i.e., coronary artery disease and ischaemic stroke) [113-115], and cardiovascular death [116-118]. Notably, ACPAs are 3-fold more frequently detected in the serum of patients without rheumatoid arthritis but with coronary artery disease than in asymptomatic blood donors [119]. The presence of ACPAs in the serum of patients with myocardial infarction (also not suffering from rheumatoid arthritis) has been associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death after 10 years of follow-up [120]. Likewise, high levels of ACPAs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis correlated with coronary artery calcification [121] and aortic calcification [18]. These epidemiological links indicated the clinical relevance of citrullination for cardiovascular disease. However, whether and how citrullination affects the development of atherosclerosis remains unclear. Proteomic studies found that carotid and aortic plaques isolated from patients without rheumatoid arthritis nonetheless have higher levels of citrullinated fibrinogen [18]. Subsequent immunohistochemical analysis of coronary plaques from a similar patient cohort revealed co-localisation of citrullinated proteins (including fibrinogen) with PADI4 [18].

In addition to the role of citrullination in the generation of neoepitopes in plaques, atherosclerosis is believed to be enhanced by the assemble of NETs which represent the supramolecular complexes composed of extruded, decondensed citrullinated chromatin which are released from neutrophils into the circulation and the extracellular matrix [30, 33, 122]. NETs also promote the development of inflammation [123-125] and clotting in injured [33] and healthy arteries [126]. Transplantation of PADI4-deficient bone marrow-derived cells to wild-type γ-irradiated mice, as well as intravenous administration of DNAse, prevented neointimal hyperplasia and thrombosis after electrical current-induced and cholesterol-rich diet-promoted endothelial injury [122]. Likewise, DNase-deficient mice were prone to pulmonary thrombosis as compared with wild-type animals [126].

In this study, we found that, in contrast to adjacent arterial segments, the proteome of carotid atherosclerotic plaques contains molecular signatures of activated innate immune response, response to lipopolysaccharide, NF-κB binding, endogenous TLR regulation, interferon signalling, respiratory burst, response to oxygen- containing compounds (potentially including reactive oxygen species), lysosomal transport, regulation of phagocytosis, positive regulation of cell death, organisation of extracellular vesicles, clathrin-coated vesicle cargo loading, and vesicle budding from the membrane. Taken together, these molecular categories suggested the involvement of sterile inflammation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Among the processes engaged in the development of aseptic inflammation, we focused on citrullination as its extent highly depends on innate immunity, oxidative stress, cell death, and phagocytosis [127-129] that collectively indicates citrullination as an inflammatory-dependent condition. Further, citrullination potentiates inflammation through generated neoepitopes as discussed above [130-133]. Therefore, we suggested that citrullination might be associated with the development of atherosclerotic plaques (i.e., neointimal hyperplasia) and not be restricted to atherothrombosis occurring because of plaque erosion or rupture. As the proteomic analysis pointed at the possible involvement of extracellular vesicles in plaque progression, we have also interrogated the co-localisation of citrullination-specific enzymes with proteins which are enriched in extracellular vesicles. Unfortunately, we did not assess gut and thrombus microbiota composition and therefore were unable to evaluate its impact on plaque citrullination. We also did not study the impact of anti-ischemic therapy on the citrullination of histones or other citrullinated proteins, and fulfilling this task would require a higher sample size and a standardized technique for an objective assessment of protein citrullination within the plaque. These two shortcomings should be mentioned as the limitations of our study.

Further studies might investigate the efficacy of small molecule inhibitors (AFM-30a for PAD2; JBI-589, GSK199 and GSK484 for PAD4) in the prevention or treatment of cardiovascular disease. Application of these drugs provided successful inhibition of PAD2 and PAD4 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [134] and neutrophils [134-137], in cell-free synovial fluid samples withdrawn from patients with rheumatoid arthritis [134], and in murine collagen-induced arthritis model [104, 137, 138]. Selective inhibitors of PAD4 (JBI-589 and GSK484) have prevented the development of inflammation-associated heart failure in this animal model by inhibiting neutrophil infiltration and halting the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in the heart [138, 139]. Further, GSK484 has reduced the deposition of neutrophil extracellular traps and preserved endothelial integrity at sites of electrical current-induced and constrictive cuff-promoted intimal injury [140] and inhibited neutrophil extracellular trap-related thrombosis in mice [141]. GSK484 has also shown effectiveness in ameliorating giant cell myocarditis in rats [142]. It would also be feasible to test the aforementioned PAD inhibitors in combination with drugs that have previously shown anti-inflammatory effects in atherosclerotic plaque, such as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors [143-145]. Further, the effectiveness of PAD inhibitors might be also affected by the gut microbiota composition, which has been previously shown as a factor defining the severity of atherothrombosis in hyperglycemic patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction [146]. Collectively, these findings indicate the relevance of inhibiting PAD2 and PAD4 for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease and underline the importance of respective pre-clinical and clinical trials in various settings. In particular, the abovementioned small molecule inhibitors of PAD2 (AFM-30a) and PAD4 (JBI-589, GSK199 and GSK484) hold promise for the prevention of endothelial injury and inflammation, two major pathological processes driving atherosclerosis.

CONCLUSION

We found that citrullination frequently accompanies the development of carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Citrullinated proteins (i.e., those distinguished by the antibodies to peptidylcitrulline), as well as PADI2, were detected in the neointima but not in the tunica media, suggesting that citrullination is largely specific for atherosclerosis and is rarely encountered in the intact blood vessels. However, peptidylcitrulline and PADI2/4 were also found in the arterial segments adjacent to the plaque, although in lower quantities than in established plaques. PADI2 and peptidylcitrulline were co-localised with the cells in the neointima, and 70–90% of PADI2 were co-localised with either neointimal cells or the extracellular vesicles (as CD81 is expressed both on cell and extracellular vesicle membranes). We speculate that citrullination (i.e., the emergence of neoepitopes) might occur at any stage of atherosclerosis but does not involve tunica media even at severe stenosis or plaque rupture. However, we detected neither decondensed chromatin nor sporadic complexes of NE/ELA2, citrullinated proteins, and unwound chromatin signifying NETs. In addition, we have not documented any significant increase in ACPAs in the serum of patients with ischaemic stroke in comparison with healthy volunteers, defining citrullination as a local phenomenon in patients with established carotid plaques. Collectively, our findings support the pathophysiological link between the formation of neoepitopes and neointimal hyperplasia and provide another justification for the use of anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g., non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, selective cytokine inhibitors and small molecule PAD inhibitors) in the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events, as they likely restrict plaque progression. We have recently initiated a preclinical trial implicating oral, selective, small molecule inhibitors of PADI2 (AFM-30a) and PADI4 (JBI-589, GSK199, and GSK484) to suppress chronic low-grade inflammation, aortic atherosclerosis, and aortic valve calcification in ApoE-/- mice. These pharmaceuticals fit the demands of lifelong therapy in terms of route of administration (as they have high bioavailability when used per os, in contrast to monoclonal antibodies), expected effects (inhibition of non-specific inflammation and reduced formation of NETs which might provoke thrombosis), and cost (although they are more expensive than antiplatelet drugs, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and statins, they are considerably cheaper than monoclonal antibodies). Nevertheless, their efficacy and safety for impeding the development of atherosclerosis and preventing the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events are yet to be confirmed. We suggested hyperlipidemic mice as a relevant model for such a preclinical trial as they rapidly accumulate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and calcium in the aorta and aortic valve, especially a high-fat diet. However, the trial is ongoing and no conclusive results have been obtained hitherto.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

PADI

Peptidylarginine Deiminase

CVD

Cardiovascular Disease

NETs

Neutrophil Extracellular Traps

MPO

Myeloperoxidase

ACPAs

Anti-citrullinated protein Anti-bodies

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS

The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: AS, AY, AK; data collection: EV, VM, LB, AS, MS, AP, AL, AT, BZ; analysis and interpretation of results: AK, DS, AS, AL. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The study was approved by the Local Ethical Committee of the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases (ethical approval code 25/2021, date of approval: 02 September 2021).

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and/or research committee and with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE guidelines and methodology were followed.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD035173. Other data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

FUNDING

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (National Project Science and Universities) within the Complex Program of Basic Research under the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences within the Basic Research Topic of the Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases No. 0419-2024-0001 “Novel anti-atherosclerotic therapies and machine learning solutions for automated diagnosis and prognostication of cardiovascular disease.” The APC was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. Proteomics analysis was conducted in the Centre for Molecular and Cell Technologies, St. Petersburg State University Research Park.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

CMC-33-9-1730_SD1.pdf (18.7MB, pdf)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mondal S., Thompson P.R. Protein arginine deiminases (PADs): Biochemistry and chemical biology of protein citrullination. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52(3):818–832. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mao L., Mostafa R., Ibili E., Fert-Bober J. Role of protein deimination in cardiovascular diseases: Potential new avenues for diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Expert Rev. Proteomics. 2021;18(12):1059–1071. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2021.2018303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Curran A.M., Naik P., Giles J.T., Darrah E. PAD enzymes in rheumatoid arthritis: Pathogenic effectors and autoimmune targets. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2020;16(6):301–315. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0409-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alghamdi M., Alasmari D., Assiri A., Mattar E., Aljaddawi A.A., Alattas S.G., Redwan E.M. An overview of the intrinsic role of citrullination in autoimmune disorders. J. Immunol. Res. 2019;2019:1–39. doi: 10.1155/2019/7592851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ciesielski O., Biesiekierska M., Panthu B., Soszyński M., Pirola L., Balcerczyk A. Citrullination in the pathology of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders: Recent advances and future perspectives. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2022;79(2):94. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04126-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yuzhalin A.E. Citrullination in cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79(7):1274–1284. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-2797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sardu C., Paolisso P., Sacra C., Mauro C., Minicucci F., Portoghese M., Rizzo M.R., Barbieri M., Sasso F.C., D’Onofrio N., Balestrieri M.L., Calabrò P., Paolisso G., Marfella R. Effects of metformin therapy on coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with prediabetes with stable angina and nonobstructive coronary artery stenosis: The codyce multicenter prospective study. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(10):1946–1955. doi: 10.2337/dc18-2356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sardu C., Modugno P., Castellano G., Scisciola L., Barbieri M., Petrella L., Fanelli M., Macchia G., Caradonna E., Massetti M., Paolisso G., Marfella R. Atherosclerotic plaque fissuration and clinical outcomes in pre-diabetics vs. normoglycemics patients affected by asymptomatic significant carotid artery stenosis at 2 years of follow-up: Role of microRNAs modulation: The ATIMIR study. Biomedicines. 2021;9(4):401. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9040401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sardu C., Paolisso G., Marfella R. Inflammatory related cardiovascular diseases: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic targets. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020;26(22):2565–2573. doi: 10.2174/1381612826666200213123029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Campos J., Ponomaryov T., De Prendergast A., Whitworth K., Smith C.W., Khan A.O., Kavanagh D., Brill A. Neutrophil extracellular traps and inflammasomes cooperatively promote venous thrombosis in mice. Blood Adv. 2021;5(9):2319–2324. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sharma S., Hofbauer T.M., Ondracek A.S., Chausheva S., Alimohammadi A., Artner T., Panzenboeck A., Rinderer J., Shafran I., Mangold A., Winker R., Wohlschläger-Krenn E., Moser B., Taghavi S., Klepetko W., Preissner K.T., Lang I.M. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote fibrous vascular occlusions in chronic thrombosis. Blood. 2021;137(8):1104–1116. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020005861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martinod K., Demers M., Fuchs T.A., Wong S.L., Brill A., Gallant M., Hu J., Wang Y., Wagner D.D. Neutrophil histone modification by peptidylarginine deiminase 4 is critical for deep vein thrombosis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110(21):8674–8679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301059110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brill A., Fuchs T.A., Savchenko A.S., Thomas G.M., Martinod K., De Meyer S.F., Bhandari A.A., Wagner D.D. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote deep vein thrombosis in mice. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2012;10(1):136–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04544.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fuchs T.A., Brill A., Duerschmied D., Schatzberg D., Monestier M., Myers D.D., Jr, Wrobleski S.K., Wakefield T.W., Hartwig J.H., Wagner D.D. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107(36):15880–15885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005743107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Savchenko A.S., Borissoff J.I., Martinod K., De Meyer S.F., Gallant M., Erpenbeck L., Brill A., Wang Y., Wagner D.D. VWF-mediated leukocyte recruitment with chromatin decondensation by PAD4 increases myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. Blood. 2014;123(1):141–148. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-514992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mangold A., Alias S., Scherz T., Hofbauer T.M., Jakowitsch J., Panzenböck A., Simon D., Laimer D., Bangert C., Kammerlander A., Mascherbauer J., Winter M.P., Distelmaier K., Adlbrecht C., Preissner K.T., Lang I.M. Coronary neutrophil extracellular trap burden and deoxyribonuclease activity in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome are predictors of ST-segment resolution and infarct size. Circ. Res. 2015;116(7):1182–1192. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Borissoff J.I., Joosen I.A., Versteylen M.O., Brill A., Fuchs T.A., Savchenko A.S., Gallant M., Martinod K., ten Cate H., Hofstra L., Crijns H.J., Wagner D.D., Kietselaer B.L.J.H. Elevated levels of circulating DNA and chromatin are independently associated with severe coronary atherosclerosis and a prothrombotic state. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013;33(8):2032–2040. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sokolove J., Brennan M.J., Sharpe O., Lahey L.J., Kao A.H., Krishnan E., Edmundowicz D., Lepus C.M., Wasko M.C., Robinson W.H. Brief report: Citrullination within the atherosclerotic plaque: A potential target for the anti-citrullinated protein antibody response in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(7):1719–1724. doi: 10.1002/art.37961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Megens R.T.A., Vijayan S., Lievens D., Döring Y., van Zandvoort M.A.M.J., Grommes J., Weber C., Soehnlein O. Presence of luminal neutrophil extracellular traps in atherosclerosis. Thromb. Haemost. 2012;107(3):597–598. doi: 10.1160/TH11-09-0650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu Y., Carmona-Rivera C., Moore E., Seto N.L., Knight J.S., Pryor M., Yang Z.H., Hemmers S., Remaley A.T., Mowen K.A., Kaplan M.J. Myeloid-specific deletion of peptidylarginine deiminase 4 mitigates atherosclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1680. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Warnatsch A., Ioannou M., Wang Q., Papayannopoulos V. Neutrophil extracellular traps license macrophages for cytokine production in atherosclerosis. Science. 2015;349(6245):316–320. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pertiwi K., van der Wal A., Pabittei D., Mackaaij C., van Leeuwen M., Li X., de Boer O. Neutrophil extracellular traps participate in all different types of thrombotic and haemorrhagic complications of coronary atherosclerosis. Thromb. Haemost. 2018;118(6):1078–1087. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Silvestre-Roig C., Braster Q., Wichapong K., Lee E.Y., Teulon J.M., Berrebeh N., Winter J., Adrover J.M., Santos G.S., Froese A., Lemnitzer P., Ortega-Gómez A., Chevre R., Marschner J., Schumski A., Winter C., Perez-Olivares L., Pan C., Paulin N., Schoufour T., Hartwig H., González-Ramos S., Kamp F., Megens R.T.A., Mowen K.A., Gunzer M., Maegdefessel L., Hackeng T., Lutgens E., Daemen M., von Blume J., Anders H.J., Nikolaev V.O., Pellequer J.L., Weber C., Hidalgo A., Nicolaes G.A.F., Wong G.C.L., Soehnlein O. Externalized histone H4 orchestrates chronic inflammation by inducing lytic cell death. Nature. 2019;569(7755):236–240. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1167-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Knight J.S., Luo W., O’Dell A.A., Yalavarthi S., Zhao W., Subramanian V., Guo C., Grenn R.C., Thompson P.R., Eitzman D.T., Kaplan M.J. Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition reduces vascular damage and modulates innate immune responses in murine models of atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2014;114(6):947–956. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meegan J.E., Yang X., Beard R.S., Jr, Jannaway M., Chatterjee V., Taylor-Clark T.E., Yuan S.Y. Citrullinated histone 3 causes endothelial barrier dysfunction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;503(3):1498–1502. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.07.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Carmona-Rivera C., Zhao W., Yalavarthi S., Kaplan M.J. Neutrophil extracellular traps induce endothelial dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus through the activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015;74(7):1417–1424. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gupta A.K., Joshi M.B., Philippova M., Erne P., Hasler P., Hahn S., Resink T.J. Activated endothelial cells induce neutrophil extracellular traps and are susceptible to NETosis-mediated cell death. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(14):3193–3197. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Quillard T., Araújo H.A., Franck G., Shvartz E., Sukhova G., Libby P. TLR2 and neutrophils potentiate endothelial stress, apoptosis and detachment: Implications for superficial erosion. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36(22):1394–1404. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Döring Y., Soehnlein O., Weber C. Neutrophil extracellular traps in atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis. Circ. Res. 2017;120(4):736–743. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Döring Y., Libby P., Soehnlein O. Neutrophil extracellular traps participate in cardiovascular diseases. Circ. Res. 2020;126(9):1228–1241. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.315931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Al-U’datt D.G.F., Allen B.G., Hiram R., Alrabadi N. Current knowledge into the role of the peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) enzyme family in cardiovascular disease. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021;891:173765. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wagner D.D., Heger L.A. Thromboinflammation: From atherosclerosis to covid-19. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2022;42(9):1103–1112. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.317162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hidalgo A., Libby P., Soehnlein O., Aramburu I.V., Papayannopoulos V., Silvestre-Roig C. Neutrophil extracellular traps: From physiology to pathology. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022;118(13):2737–2753. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Théry C., Witwer K.W., Aikawa E., Alcaraz M.J., Anderson J.D., Andriantsitohaina R., Antoniou A., Arab T., Archer F., Atkin-Smith G.K., Ayre D.C., Bach J.M., Bachurski D., Baharvand H., Balaj L., Baldacchino S., Bauer N.N., Baxter A.A., Bebawy M., Beckham C., Bedina Zavec A., Benmoussa A., Berardi A.C., Bergese P., Bielska E., Blenkiron C., Bobis-Wozowicz S., Boilard E., Boireau W., Bongiovanni A., Borràs F.E., Bosch S., Boulanger C.M., Breakefield X., Breglio A.M., Brennan M.Á., Brigstock D.R., Brisson A., Broekman M.L.D., Bromberg J.F., Bryl-Górecka P., Buch S., Buck A.H., Burger D., Busatto S., Buschmann D., Bussolati B., Buzás E.I., Byrd J.B., Camussi G., Carter D.R.F., Caruso S., Chamley L.W., Chang Y.T., Chen C., Chen S., Cheng L., Chin A.R., Clayton A., Clerici S.P., Cocks A., Cocucci E., Coffey R.J., Cordeiro-da-Silva A., Couch Y., Coumans F.A.W., Coyle B., Crescitelli R., Criado M.F., D’Souza-Schorey C., Das S., Datta Chaudhuri A., de Candia P., De Santana E.F., De Wever O., del Portillo H.A., Demaret T., Deville S., Devitt A., Dhondt B., Di Vizio D., Dieterich L.C., Dolo V., Dominguez Rubio A.P., Dominici M., Dourado M.R., Driedonks T.A.P., Duarte F.V., Duncan H.M., Eichenberger R.M., Ekström K., EL Andaloussi S., Elie-Caille C., Erdbrügger U., Falcón-Pérez J.M., Fatima F., Fish J.E., Flores-Bellver M., Försönits A., Frelet-Barrand A., Fricke F., Fuhrmann G., Gabrielsson S., Gámez-Valero A., Gardiner C., Gärtner K., Gaudin R., Gho Y.S., Giebel B., Gilbert C., Gimona M., Giusti I., Goberdhan D.C.I., Görgens A., Gorski S.M., Greening D.W., Gross J.C., Gualerzi A., Gupta G.N., Gustafson D., Handberg A., Haraszti R.A., Harrison P., Hegyesi H., Hendrix A., Hill A.F., Hochberg F.H., Hoffmann K.F., Holder B., Holthofer H., Hosseinkhani B., Hu G., Huang Y., Huber V., Hunt S., Ibrahim A.G.E., Ikezu T., Inal J.M., Isin M., Ivanova A., Jackson H.K., Jacobsen S., Jay S.M., Jayachandran M., Jenster G., Jiang L., Johnson S.M., Jones J.C., Jong A., Jovanovic-Talisman T., Jung S., Kalluri R., Kano S., Kaur S., Kawamura Y., Keller E.T., Khamari D., Khomyakova E., Khvorova A., Kierulf P., Kim K.P., Kislinger T., Klingeborn M., Klinke D.J., II, Kornek M., Kosanović M.M., Kovács Á.F., Krämer-Albers E.M., Krasemann S., Krause M., Kurochkin I.V., Kusuma G.D., Kuypers S., Laitinen S., Langevin S.M., Languino L.R., Lannigan J., Lässer C., Laurent L.C., Lavieu G., Lázaro-Ibáñez E., Le Lay S., Lee M.S., Lee Y.X.F., Lemos D.S., Lenassi M., Leszczynska A., Li I.T.S., Liao K., Libregts S.F., Ligeti E., Lim R., Lim S.K., Linē A., Linnemannstöns K., Llorente A., Lombard C.A., Lorenowicz M.J., Lörincz Á.M., Lötvall J., Lovett J., Lowry M.C., Loyer X., Lu Q., Lukomska B., Lunavat T.R., Maas S.L.N., Malhi H., Marcilla A., Mariani J., Mariscal J., Martens-Uzunova E.S., Martin-Jaular L., Martinez M.C., Martins V.R., Mathieu M., Mathivanan S., Maugeri M., McGinnis L.K., McVey M.J., Meckes D.G., Jr, Meehan K.L., Mertens I., Minciacchi V.R., Möller A., Møller Jørgensen M., Morales-Kastresana A., Morhayim J., Mullier F., Muraca M., Musante L., Mussack V., Muth D.C., Myburgh K.H., Najrana T., Nawaz M., Nazarenko I., Nejsum P., Neri C., Neri T., Nieuwland R., Nimrichter L., Nolan J.P., Nolte-’t Hoen E.N.M., Noren Hooten N., O’Driscoll L., O’Grady T., O’Loghlen A., Ochiya T., Olivier M., Ortiz A., Ortiz L.A., Osteikoetxea X., Østergaard O., Ostrowski M., Park J., Pegtel D.M., Peinado H., Perut F., Pfaffl M.W., Phinney D.G., Pieters B.C.H., Pink R.C., Pisetsky D.S., Pogge von Strandmann E., Polakovicova I., Poon I.K.H., Powell B.H., Prada I., Pulliam L., Quesenberry P., Radeghieri A., Raffai R.L., Raimondo S., Rak J., Ramirez M.I., Raposo G., Rayyan M.S., Regev-Rudzki N., Ricklefs F.L., Robbins P.D., Roberts D.D., Rodrigues S.C., Rohde E., Rome S., Rouschop K.M.A., Rughetti A., Russell A.E., Saá P., Sahoo S., Salas-Huenuleo E., Sánchez C., Saugstad J.A., Saul M.J., Schiffelers R.M., Schneider R., Schøyen T.H., Scott A., Shahaj E., Sharma S., Shatnyeva O., Shekari F., Shelke G.V., Shetty A.K., Shiba K., Siljander P.R.M., Silva A.M., Skowronek A., Snyder O.L., II, Soares R.P., Sódar B.W., Soekmadji C., Sotillo J., Stahl P.D., Stoorvogel W., Stott S.L., Strasser E.F., Swift S., Tahara H., Tewari M., Timms K., Tiwari S., Tixeira R., Tkach M., Toh W.S., Tomasini R., Torrecilhas A.C., Tosar J.P., Toxavidis V., Urbanelli L., Vader P., van Balkom B.W.M., van der Grein S.G., Van Deun J., van Herwijnen M.J.C., Van Keuren-Jensen K., van Niel G., van Royen M.E., van Wijnen A.J., Vasconcelos M.H., Vechetti I.J., Jr, Veit T.D., Vella L.J., Velot É., Verweij F.J., Vestad B., Viñas J.L., Visnovitz T., Vukman K.V., Wahlgren J., Watson D.C., Wauben M.H.M., Weaver A., Webber J.P., Weber V., Wehman A.M., Weiss D.J., Welsh J.A., Wendt S., Wheelock A.M., Wiener Z., Witte L., Wolfram J., Xagorari A., Xander P., Xu J., Yan X., Yáñez-Mó M., Yin H., Yuana Y., Zappulli V., Zarubova J., Žėkas V., Zhang J., Zhao Z., Zheng L., Zheutlin A.R., Zickler A.M., Zimmermann P., Zivkovic A.M., Zocco D., Zuba-Surma E.K. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A position statement of the international society for extracellular vesicles and update of the misev2014 guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1535750. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yáñez-Mó M., Siljander P.R.M., Andreu Z., Bedina Zavec A., Borràs F.E., Buzas E.I., Buzas K., Casal E., Cappello F., Carvalho J., Colás E., Cordeiro-da Silva A., Fais S., Falcon-Perez J.M., Ghobrial I.M., Giebel B., Gimona M., Graner M., Gursel I., Gursel M., Heegaard N.H.H., Hendrix A., Kierulf P., Kokubun K., Kosanovic M., Kralj-Iglic V., Krämer-Albers E.M., Laitinen S., Lässer C., Lener T., Ligeti E., Linē A., Lipps G., Llorente A., Lötvall J., Manček-Keber M., Marcilla A., Mittelbrunn M., Nazarenko I., Nolte-’t Hoen E.N.M., Nyman T.A., O’Driscoll L., Olivan M., Oliveira C., Pállinger É., del Portillo H.A., Reventós J., Rigau M., Rohde E., Sammar M., Sánchez-Madrid F., Santarém N., Schallmoser K., Stampe Ostenfeld M., Stoorvogel W., Stukelj R., Van der Grein S.G., Helena Vasconcelos M., Wauben M.H.M., De Wever O. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2015;4(1):27066. doi: 10.3402/jev.v4.27066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jeppesen D.K., Fenix A.M., Franklin J.L., Higginbotham J.N., Zhang Q., Zimmerman L.J., Liebler D.C., Ping J., Liu Q., Evans R., Fissell W.H., Patton J.G., Rome L.H., Burnette D.T., Coffey R.J. Reassessment of exosome composition. Cell. 2019;177(2):428–445.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mathieu M., Névo N., Jouve M., Valenzuela J.I., Maurin M., Verweij F.J., Palmulli R., Lankar D., Dingli F., Loew D., Rubinstein E., Boncompain G., Perez F., Théry C. Specificities of exosome versus small ectosome secretion revealed by live intracellular tracking of CD63 and CD9. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):4389. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24384-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang Q., Jeppesen D.K., Higginbotham J.N., Franklin J.L., Coffey R.J. Comprehensive isolation of extracellular vesicles and nanoparticles. Nat. Protoc. 2023;18(5):1462–1487. doi: 10.1038/s41596-023-00811-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Andreu Z., Yáñez-Mó M. Tetraspanins in extracellular vesicle formation and function. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:442. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shishkova D.K., Velikanova E.A., Bogdanov L.A., Sinitsky M.Y., Kostyunin A.E., Tsepokina A.V., Gruzdeva O.V., Mironov A.V., Mukhamadiyarov R.A., Glushkova T.V., Krivkina E.O., Matveeva V.G., Hryachkova O.N., Markova V.E., Dyleva Y.A., Belik E.V., Frolov A.V., Shabaev A.R., Efimova O.S., Popova A.N., Malysheva V.Y., Kolmykov R.P., Sevostyanov O.G., Russakov D.M., Dolganyuk V.F., Gutakovsky A.K., Zhivodkov Y.A., Kozhukhov A.S., Brusina E.B., Ismagilov Z.R., Barbarash O.L., Yuzhalin A.E., Kutikhin A.G. Calciprotein particles link disturbed mineral homeostasis with cardiovascular disease by causing endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(22):12458. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kappert L., Ruzicka P., Kutikhin A., De La Torre C., Fischer A., Hecker M., Arnold C., Korff T. Loss of Nfat5 promotes lipid accumulation in vascular smooth muscle cells. FASEB J. 2021;35(9):e21831. doi: 10.1096/fj.202100682R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shishkova D., Lobov A., Repkin E., Markova V., Markova Y., Sinitskaya A., Sinitsky M., Kondratiev E., Torgunakova E., Kutikhin A. Calciprotein particles induce cellular compartment-specific proteome alterations in human arterial endothelial cells. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023;11(1):5. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11010005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Frolov A., Lobov A., Kabilov M., Zainullina B., Tupikin A., Shishkova D., Markova V., Sinitskaya A., Grigoriev E., Markova Y., Kutikhin A. Multi-omics profiling of human endothelial cells from the coronary artery and internal thoracic artery reveals molecular but not functional heterogeneity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(19):15032. doi: 10.3390/ijms241915032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Antonova L.V., Sevostianova V.V., Silnikov V.N., Krivkina E.O., Velikanova E.A., Mironov A.V., Shabaev A.R., Senokosova E.A., Khanova M.Y., Glushkova T.V., Akentieva T.N., Sinitskaya A.V., Markova V.E., Shishkova D.K., Lobov A.A., Repkin E.A., Stepanov A.D., Kutikhin A.G., Barbarash L.S. Comparison of the patency and regenerative potential of biodegradable vascular prostheses of different polymer compositions in an ovine model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(10):8540. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kostyunin A.E., Glushkova T.V., Lobov A.A., Ovcharenko E.A., Zainullina B.R., Bogdanov L.A., Shishkova D.K., Markova V.E., Asanov M.A., Mukhamadiyarov R.A., Velikanova E.A., Akentyeva T.N., Rezvova M.A., Stasev A.N., Evtushenko A.V., Barbarash L.S., Kutikhin A.G. Proteolytic degradation is a major contributor to bioprosthetic heart valve failure. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2023;12(1):e028215. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Antonova L., Kutikhin A., Sevostianova V., Lobov A., Repkin E., Krivkina E., Velikanova E., Mironov A., Mukhamadiyarov R., Senokosova E., Khanova M., Shishkova D., Markova V., Barbarash L. Controlled and synchronised vascular regeneration upon the implantation of iloprost- and cationic amphiphilic drugs-conjugated tissue-engineered vascular grafts into the ovine carotid artery: A proteomics-empowered study. Polymers. 2022;14(23):5149. doi: 10.3390/polym14235149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shishkova D., Lobov A., Zainullina B., Matveeva V., Markova V., Sinitskaya A., Velikanova E., Sinitsky M., Kanonykina A., Dyleva Y., Kutikhin A. Calciprotein particles cause physiologically significant pro-inflammatory response in endothelial cells and systemic circulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(23):14941. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Perez-Riverol Y., Bai J., Bandla C., García-Seisdedos D., Hewapathirana S., Kamatchinathan S., Kundu D.J., Prakash A., Frericks-Zipper A., Eisenacher M., Walzer M., Wang S., Brazma A., Vizcaíno J.A. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: A hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D543–D552. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen H., Boutros P.C. VennDiagram: A package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12(1):35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Narasimhan B., Chu G. Impute: Imputation for microarray data. 2021;17(6):520–525. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ritchie M.E., Phipson B., Wu D., Hu Y., Law C.W., Shi W., Smyth G.K. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rohart F., Gautier B., Singh A., Lê Cao K.A. mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2017;13(11):e1005752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wickham H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kolde R., Kolde M.R. Pheatmap. R package . 2015;1(7):790. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J.M., Davis A.P., Dolinski K., Dwight S.S., Eppig J.T., Harris M.A., Hill D.P., Issel-Tarver L., Kasarskis A., Lewis S., Matese J.C., Richardson J.E., Ringwald M., Rubin G.M., Sherlock G., The Gene Ontology Consortium Gene Ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000;25(1):25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Carbon S., Douglass E., Good B.M., Unni D.R., Harris N.L., Mungall C.J., Basu S., Chisholm R.L., Dodson R.J., Hartline E., Fey P., Thomas P.D., Albou L-P., Ebert D., Kesling M.J., Mi H., Muruganujan A., Huang X., Mushayahama T., LaBonte S.A., Siegele D.A., Antonazzo G., Attrill H., Brown N.H., Garapati P., Marygold S.J., Trovisco V., dos Santos G., Falls K., Tabone C., Zhou P., Goodman J.L., Strelets V.B., Thurmond J., Garmiri P., Ishtiaq R., Rodríguez-López M., Acencio M.L., Kuiper M., Lægreid A., Logie C., Lovering R.C., Kramarz B., Saverimuttu S.C.C., Pinheiro S.M., Gunn H., Su R., Thurlow K.E., Chibucos M., Giglio M., Nadendla S., Munro J., Jackson R., Duesbury M.J., Del-Toro N., Meldal B.H.M., Paneerselvam K., Perfetto L., Porras P., Orchard S., Shrivastava A., Chang H-Y., Finn R.D., Mitchell A.L., Rawlings N.D., Richardson L., Sangrador-Vegas A., Blake J.A., Christie K.R., Dolan M.E., Drabkin H.J., Hill D.P., Ni L., Sitnikov D.M., Harris M.A., Oliver S.G., Rutherford K., Wood V., Hayles J., Bähler J., Bolton E.R., De Pons J.L., Dwinell M.R., Hayman G.T., Kaldunski M.L., Kwitek A.E., Laulederkind S.J.F., Plasterer C., Tutaj M.A., Vedi M., Wang S-J., D’Eustachio P., Matthews L., Balhoff J.P., Aleksander S.A., Alexander M.J., Cherry J.M., Engel S.R., Gondwe F., Karra K., Miyasato S.R., Nash R.S., Simison M., Skrzypek M.S., Weng S., Wong E.D., Feuermann M., Gaudet P., Morgat A., Bakker E., Berardini T.Z., Reiser L., Subramaniam S., Huala E., Arighi C.N., Auchincloss A., Axelsen K., Argoud-Puy G., Bateman A., Blatter M-C., Boutet E., Bowler E., Breuza L., Bridge A., Britto R., Bye-A-Jee H., Casas C.C., Coudert E., Denny P., Estreicher A., Famiglietti M.L., Georghiou G., Gos A., Gruaz-Gumowski N., Hatton-Ellis E., Hulo C., Ignatchenko A., Jungo F., Laiho K., Le Mercier P., Lieberherr D., Lock A., Lussi Y., MacDougall A., Magrane M., Martin M.J., Masson P., Natale D.A., Hyka-Nouspikel N., Orchard S., Pedruzzi I., Pourcel L., Poux S., Pundir S., Rivoire C., Speretta E., Sundaram S., Tyagi N., Warner K., Zaru R., Wu C.H., Diehl A.D., Chan J.N., Grove C., Lee R.Y.N., Muller H-M., Raciti D., Van Auken K., Sternberg P.W., Berriman M., Paulini M., Howe K., Gao S., Wright A., Stein L., Howe D.G., Toro S., Westerfield M., Jaiswal P., Cooper L., Elser J., Gene Ontology Consortium The Gene Ontology resource: Enriching a gold mine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D325–D334. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gillespie M., Jassal B., Stephan R., Milacic M., Rothfels K., Senff-Ribeiro A., Griss J., Sevilla C., Matthews L., Gong C., Deng C., Varusai T., Ragueneau E., Haider Y., May B., Shamovsky V., Weiser J., Brunson T., Sanati N., Beckman L., Shao X., Fabregat A., Sidiropoulos K., Murillo J., Viteri G., Cook J., Shorser S., Bader G., Demir E., Sander C., Haw R., Wu G., Stein L., Hermjakob H., D’Eustachio P. The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D687–D692. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Griss J., Viteri G., Sidiropoulos K., Nguyen V., Fabregat A., Hermjakob H. ReactomeGSA - Efficient multi-omics comparative pathway analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2020;19(12):2115–2125. doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR120.002155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bateman A., Martin M-J., Orchard S., Magrane M., Agivetova R., Ahmad S., Alpi E., Bowler-Barnett E.H., Britto R., Bursteinas B., Bye-A-Jee H., Coetzee R., Cukura A., Da Silva A., Denny P., Dogan T., Ebenezer T.G., Fan J., Castro L.G., Garmiri P., Georghiou G., Gonzales L., Hatton-Ellis E., Hussein A., Ignatchenko A., Insana G., Ishtiaq R., Jokinen P., Joshi V., Jyothi D., Lock A., Lopez R., Luciani A., Luo J., Lussi Y., MacDougall A., Madeira F., Mahmoudy M., Menchi M., Mishra A., Moulang K., Nightingale A., Oliveira C.S., Pundir S., Qi G., Raj S., Rice D., Lopez M.R., Saidi R., Sampson J., Sawford T., Speretta E., Turner E., Tyagi N., Vasudev P., Volynkin V., Warner K., Watkins X., Zaru R., Zellner H., Bridge A., Poux S., Redaschi N., Aimo L., Argoud-Puy G., Auchincloss A., Axelsen K., Bansal P., Baratin D., Blatter M-C., Bolleman J., Boutet E., Breuza L., Casals-Casas C., de Castro E., Echioukh K.C., Coudert E., Cuche B., Doche M., Dornevil D., Estreicher A., Famiglietti M.L., Feuermann M., Gasteiger E., Gehant S., Gerritsen V., Gos A., Gruaz-Gumowski N., Hinz U., Hulo C., Hyka-Nouspikel N., Jungo F., Keller G., Kerhornou A., Lara V., Le Mercier P., Lieberherr D., Lombardot T., Martin X., Masson P., Morgat A., Neto T.B., Paesano S., Pedruzzi I., Pilbout S., Pourcel L., Pozzato M., Pruess M., Rivoire C., Sigrist C., Sonesson K., Stutz A., Sundaram S., Tognolli M., Verbregue L., Wu C.H., Arighi C.N., Arminski L., Chen C., Chen Y., Garavelli J.S., Huang H., Laiho K., McGarvey P., Natale D.A., Ross K., Vinayaka C.R., Wang Q., Wang Y., Yeh L-S., Zhang J., Ruch P., Teodoro D., UniProt Consortium UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D480–D489. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kanehisa M., Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kanehisa M., Furumichi M., Sato Y., Ishiguro-Watanabe M., Tanabe M. KEGG: Integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D545–D551. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shishkova D., Markova V., Sinitsky M., Tsepokina A., Velikanova E., Bogdanov L., Glushkova T., Kutikhin A. Calciprotein particles cause endothelial dysfunction under flow. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(22):8802. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shishkova D., Markova V., Sinitsky M., Tsepokina A., Frolov A., Zagorodnikov N., Bogdanov L., Kutikhin A. Co-culture of primary human coronary artery and internal thoracic artery endothelial cells results in mutually beneficial paracrine interactions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(21):8032. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shishkova D., Velikanova E., Sinitsky M., Tsepokina A., Gruzdeva O., Bogdanov L., Kutikhin A. Calcium phosphate bions cause intimal hyperplasia in intact aortas of normolipidemic rats through endothelial injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20(22):5728. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gruzdeva O., Dyleva Y., Belik E., Uchasova E., Ponasenko A., Ivanov S., Zinets M., Stasev A., Kutikhin A., Markova V., Poddubnyak A., Gorbatovskaya E., Fanaskova E., Barbarash O. Expression of ceramide-metabolizing enzymes in the heart adipose tissue of cardiovascular disease patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(11):9494. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bogdanov L., Shishkova D., Mukhamadiyarov R., Velikanova E., Tsepokina A., Terekhov A., Koshelev V., Kanonykina A., Shabaev A., Frolov A., Zagorodnikov N., Kutikhin A. Excessive adventitial and perivascular vascularisation correlates with vascular inflammation and intimal hyperplasia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(20):12156. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fert-Bober J., Sokolove J. Proteomics of citrullination in cardiovascular disease. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2014;8(7-8):522–533. doi: 10.1002/prca.201400013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gudmann N.S., Hansen N.U.B., Jensen A.C.B., Karsdal M.A., Siebuhr A.S. Biological relevance of citrullinations: Diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic options. Autoimmunity. 2015;48(2):73–79. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2014.962024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fert-Bober J., Darrah E., Andrade F. Insights into the study and origin of the citrullinome in rheumatoid arthritis. Immunol. Rev. 2020;294(1):133–147. doi: 10.1111/imr.12834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.van Beers J.J.B.C., Schwarte C.M., Stammen-Vogelzangs J., Oosterink E., Božič B., Pruijn G.J.M. The rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid citrullinome reveals novel citrullinated epitopes in apolipoprotein E, myeloid nuclear differentiation antigen, and β-actin. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(1):69–80. doi: 10.1002/art.37720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tutturen A.E.V., Fleckenstein B., de Souza G.A. Assessing the citrullinome in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid with and without enrichment of citrullinated peptides. J. Proteome Res. 2014;13(6):2867–2873. doi: 10.1021/pr500030x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang F., Chen F.F., Gao W.B., Wang H.Y., Zhao N.W., Xu M., Gao D.Y., Yu W., Yan X.L., Zhao J.N., Li X.J. Identification of citrullinated peptides in the synovial fluid of patients with rheumatoid arthritis using LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF. Clin. Rheumatol. 2016;35(9):2185–2194. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3247-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tilvawala R., Nguyen S.H., Maurais A.J., Nemmara V.V., Nagar M., Salinger A.J., Nagpal S., Weerapana E., Thompson P.R. The rheumatoid arthritis-associated citrullinome. Cell Chem. Biol. 2018;25(6):691–704.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sharma M., Damgaard D., Senolt L., Svensson B., Bay- Jensen A.C., Nielsen C.H., Hägglund P. Expanding the citrullinome of synovial fibrinogen from rheumatoid arthritis patients. J. Proteomics. 2019;208:103484. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Maurais A.J., Salinger A.J., Tobin M., Shaffer S.A., Weerapana E., Thompson P.R. A streamlined data analysis pipeline for the identification of sites of citrullination. Biochemistry. 2021;60(38):2902–2914. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tanikawa C., Espinosa M., Suzuki A., Masuda K., Yamamoto K., Tsuchiya E., Ueda K., Daigo Y., Nakamura Y., Matsuda K. Regulation of histone modification and chromatin structure by the p53–PADI4 pathway. Nat. Commun. 2012;3(1):676. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Christophorou M.A., Castelo-Branco G., Halley-Stott R.P., Oliveira C.S., Loos R., Radzisheuskaya A., Mowen K.A., Bertone P., Silva J.C.R., Zernicka-Goetz M., Nielsen M.L., Gurdon J.B., Kouzarides T. Citrullination regulates pluripotency and histone H1 binding to chromatin. Nature. 2014;507(7490):104–108. doi: 10.1038/nature12942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Brinkmann V., Reichard U., Goosmann C., Fauler B., Uhlemann Y., Weiss D.S., Weinrauch Y., Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303(5663):1532–1535. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Daniel C., Leppkes M., Muñoz L.E., Schley G., Schett G., Herrmann M. Extracellular DNA traps in inflammation, injury and healing. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019;15(9):559–575. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0163-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Burgener S.S., Schroder K. Neutrophil extracellular traps in host defense. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2020;12(7):a037028. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a037028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Uysal H., Bockermann R., Nandakumar K.S., Sehnert B., Bajtner E., Engström Å., Serre G., Burkhardt H., Thunnissen M.M.G.M., Holmdahl R. Structure and pathogenicity of antibodies specific for citrullinated collagen type II in experimental arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206(2):449–462. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sipilä K., Haag S., Denessiouk K., Käpylä J., Peters E.C., Denesyuk A., Hansen U., Konttinen Y., Johnson M.S., Holmdahl R., Heino J. Citrullination of collagen II affects integrin-mediated cell adhesion in a receptor-specific manner. FASEB J. 2014;28(8):3758–3768. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-247767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Liang B., Ge C., Lönnblom E., Lin X., Feng H., Xiao L., Bai J., Ayoglu B., Nilsson P., Nandakumar K.S., Zhao M., Holmdahl R. The autoantibody response to cyclic citrullinated collagen type II peptides in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2019;58(9):1623–1633. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chang X., Yamada R., Suzuki A., Kochi Y., Sawada T., Yamamoto K. Citrullination of fibronectin in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue. Rheumatology. 2005;44(11):1374–1382. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Shelef M.A., Bennin D.A., Mosher D.F., Huttenlocher A. Citrullination of fibronectin modulates synovial fibroblast behavior. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012;14(6):R240. doi: 10.1186/ar4083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fan L., Wang Q., Liu R., Zong M., He D., Zhang H., Ding Y., Ma J. Citrullinated fibronectin inhibits apoptosis and promotes the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines in fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012;14(6):R266. doi: 10.1186/ar4112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sato T., Satooka H., Ichioka S., Maruo Y., Hirata T. Citrullinated fibrinogen is a target of auto-antibodies in interstitial lung disease in mice with collagen-induced arthritis. Int. Immunol. 2020;32(8):533–545. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxaa021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Varjú I., Sorvillo N., Cherpokova D., Farkas Á.Z., Farkas V.J., Komorowicz E., Feller T., Kiss B., Kellermayer M.Z., Szabó L., Wacha A., Bóta A., Longstaff C., Wagner D.D., Kolev K. Citrullinated fibrinogen renders clots mechanically less stable, but lysis-resistant. Circ. Res. 2021;129(2):342–344. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Varjú I., Tóth E., Farkas Á.Z., Farkas V.J., Komorowicz E., Feller T., Kiss B., Kellermayer M.Z., Szabó L., Wacha A., Bóta A., Longstaff C., Kolev K. Citrullinated fibrinogen forms densely packed clots with decreased permeability. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2022;20(12):2862–2872. doi: 10.1111/jth.15875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Badillo Soto M.A., Rodríguez Rodríguez M., Pérez Pérez M.E., Daza Benitez L., Bollain y Goytia J.J., Carrillo Jiménez M.A., Avalos Díaz E., Herrera Esparza R. Potential protein targets of the peptidylarginine deiminase 2 and peptidylarginine deiminase 4 enzymes in rheumatoid synovial tissue and its possible meaning. Eur. J. Rheumatol. 2016;3(2):44–49. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2015.0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chang X., Zhao Y., Wang Y., Chen Y., Yan X. Screening citrullinated proteins in synovial tissues of rheumatoid arthritis using 2-dimensional western blotting. J. Rheumatol. 2013;40(3):219–227. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Li F.J., Surolia R., Li H., Wang Z., Liu G., Kulkarni T., Massicano A.V.F., Mobley J.A., Mondal S., de Andrade J.A., Coonrod S.A., Thompson P.R., Wille K., Lapi S.E., Athar M., Thannickal V.J., Carter A.B., Antony V.B. Citrullinated vimentin mediates development and progression of lung fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021;13(585):eaba2927. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba2927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Yoshizawa Y., Nakao T., Tsuritani K., Yamada T., Watanabe N., Chiba A., Robinson W.H., Miyake S. The importance of specific citrullinated clusterin and vimentin found in a multi-coloured bead-based citrulline-peptide array system in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2020;40(5):936–944. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/ucnzun. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Krishnamurthy A., Ytterberg A.J., Sun M., Sakuraba K., Steen J., Joshua V., Tarasova N.K., Malmström V., Wähämaa H., Réthi B., Catrina A.I. Citrullination controls dendritic cell transdifferentiation into osteoclasts. J. Immunol. 2019;202(11):3143–3150. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Pironti G., Gastaldello S., Rassier D.E., Lanner J.T., Carlström M., Lund L.H., Westerblad H., Yamada T., Andersson D.C. Citrullination is linked to reduced Ca 2+ sensitivity in hearts of a murine model of rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2022;236(3):e13869. doi: 10.1111/apha.13869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Bruggeman Y., Sodré F.M.C., Buitinga M., Mathieu C., Overbergh L., Kracht M.J.L. Targeting citrullination in autoimmunity: Insights learned from preclinical mouse models. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2021;25(4):269–281. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2021.1918104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.van Venrooij W.J., van Beers J.J.B.C., Pruijn G.J.M. Anti-CCP antibodies: The past, the present and the future. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2011;7(7):391–398. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mathsson Alm L., Fountain D.L., Cadwell K.K., Madrigal A.M., Gallo G., Poorafshar M. The performance of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide assays in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2018;36(1):144–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Makrygiannakis D., af Klint E., Lundberg I.E., Löfberg R., Ulfgren A-K., Klareskog L., Catrina A.I. Citrullination is an inflammation-dependent process. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006;65(9):1219–1222. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.049403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Rondas D., Crèvecoeur I., D’Hertog W., Ferreira G.B., Staes A., Garg A.D., Eizirik D.L., Agostinis P., Gevaert K., Overbergh L., Mathieu C. Citrullinated glucose-regulated protein 78 is an autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2015;64(2):573–586. doi: 10.2337/db14-0621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Bradford C.M., Ramos I., Cross A.K., Haddock G., McQuaid S., Nicholas A.P., Woodroofe M.N. Localisation of citrullinated proteins in normal appearing white matter and lesions in the central nervous system in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2014;273(1-2):85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Chumanevich A.A., Causey C.P., Knuckley B.A., Jones J.E., Poudyal D., Chumanevich A.P., Davis T., Matesic L.E., Thompson P.R., Hofseth L.J. Suppression of colitis in mice by Cl-amidine: A novel peptidylarginine deiminase inhibitor. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2011;300(6):G929–G938. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00435.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Willis V.C., Gizinski A.M., Banda N.K., Causey C.P., Knuckley B., Cordova K.N., Luo Y., Levitt B., Glogowska M., Chandra P., Kulik L., Robinson W.H., Arend W.P., Thompson P.R., Holers V.M. N-α-benzoyl-N5-(2-chloro-1-iminoethyl)-L-ornithine amide, a protein arginine deiminase inhibitor, reduces the severity of murine collagen-induced arthritis. J. Immunol. 2011;186(7):4396–4404. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Willis V.C., Banda N.K., Cordova K.N., Chandra P.E., Robinson W.H., Cooper D.C., Lugo D., Mehta G., Taylor S., Tak P.P., Prinjha R.K., Lewis H.D., Holers V.M. Protein arginine deiminase 4 inhibition is sufficient for the amelioration of collagen-induced arthritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2017;188(2):263–274. doi: 10.1111/cei.12932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Makrygiannakis D., Revu S., Engström M., af Klint E., Nicholas A.P., Pruijn G.J.M., Catrina A.I. Local administration of glucocorticoids decreases synovial citrullination in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012;14(1):R20. doi: 10.1186/ar3702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Libby P., Buring J.E., Badimon L., Hansson G.K., Deanfield J., Bittencourt M.S., Tokgözoğlu L., Lewis E.F. Atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2019;5(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Bäck M., Yurdagul A., Jr, Tabas I., Öörni K., Kovanen P.T. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: Mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2019;16(7):389–406. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0169-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Silvestre-Roig C., Braster Q., Ortega-Gomez A., Soehnlein O. Neutrophils as regulators of cardiovascular inflammation. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17(6):327–340. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0326-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Soehnlein O., Libby P. Targeting inflammation in atherosclerosis - From experimental insights to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021;20(8):589–610. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00198-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Engelen S.E., Robinson A.J.B., Zurke Y.X., Monaco C. Therapeutic strategies targeting inflammation and immunity in atherosclerosis: how to proceed? Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2022;19(8):522–542. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00668-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Roy P., Orecchioni M., Ley K. How the immune system shapes atherosclerosis: Roles of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022;22(4):251–265. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00584-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Ambrosino P., Lupoli R., Di Minno A., Tasso M., Peluso R., Di Minno M.N.D. Subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Thromb. Haemost. 2015;113(5):916–930. doi: 10.1160/TH14-11-0921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Meune C., Touzé E., Trinquart L., Allanore Y. High risk of clinical cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis: Levels of associations of myocardial infarction and stroke through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2010;103(4):253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Avina-Zubieta J.A., Thomas J., Sadatsafavi M., Lehman A.J., Lacaille D. Risk of incident cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012;71(9):1524–1529. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Restivo V., Candiloro S., Daidone M., Norrito R., Cataldi M., Minutolo G., Caracci F., Fasano S., Ciccia F., Casuccio A., Tuttolomondo A. Systematic review and meta- analysis of cardiovascular risk in rheumatological disease: Symptomatic and non-symptomatic events in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun. Rev. 2022;21(1):102925. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Meune C., Touzé E., Trinquart L., Allanore Y. Trends in cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 50 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Rheumatology. 2009;48(10):1309–1313. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Aviña-Zubieta J.A., Choi H.K., Sadatsafavi M., Etminan M., Esdaile J.M., Lacaille D. Risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Care Res. 2008;59(12):1690–1697. doi: 10.1002/art.24092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang H., Li X., Gong G. Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with co-existing coronary artery disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Medicine. 2020;99(14):e19658. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Cambridge G., Acharya J., Cooper J.A., Edwards J.C., Humphries S.E. Antibodies to citrullinated peptides and risk of coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis. 2013;228(1):243–246. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hermans M.P.J., van der Velden D., Montero Cabezas J.M., Putter H., Huizinga T.W.J., Kuiper J., Toes R.E.M., Schalij M.J., Wouter Jukema J., van der Woude D. Long-term mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is associated with anti-citrullinated protein antibodies. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017;240:20–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Geraldino-Pardilla L., Giles J.T., Sokolove J., Zartoshti A., Robinson W.H., Budoff M., Detrano R., Bokhari S., Bathon J.M. Association of anti–citrullinated peptide antibodies with coronary artery calcification in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69(8):1276–1281. doi: 10.1002/acr.23106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Franck G., Mawson T.L., Folco E.J., Molinaro R., Ruvkun V., Engelbertsen D., Liu X., Tesmenitsky Y., Shvartz E., Sukhova G.K., Michel J.B., Nicoletti A., Lichtman A., Wagner D., Croce K.J., Libby P. Roles of PAD4 and NETosis in experimental atherosclerosis and arterial injury. Circ. Res. 2018;123(1):33–42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wang L., Luqmani R., Udalova I.A. The role of neutrophils in rheumatic disease-associated vascular inflammation. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2022;18(3):158–170. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00738-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Apel F., Zychlinsky A., Kenny E.F. The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018;14(8):467–475. doi: 10.1038/s41584-018-0039-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Papayannopoulos V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018;18(2):134–147. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Jiménez-Alcázar M., Rangaswamy C., Panda R., Bitterling J., Simsek Y.J., Long A.T., Bilyy R., Krenn V., Renné C., Renné T., Kluge S., Panzer U., Mizuta R., Mannherz H.G., Kitamura D., Herrmann M., Napirei M., Fuchs T.A. Host DNases prevent vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps. Science. 2017;358(6367):1202–1206. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Valesini G., Gerardi M.C., Iannuccelli C., Pacucci V.A., Pendolino M., Shoenfeld Y. Citrullination and autoimmunity. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015;14(6):490–497. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sipilä K.H., Ranga V., Rappu P., Mali M., Pirilä L., Heino I., Jokinen J., Käpylä J., Johnson M.S., Heino J. Joint inflammation related citrullination of functional arginines in extracellular proteins. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):8246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08597-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Rappu P., Suwal U., Siljamäki E., Heino J. Inflammation-related citrullination of matrisome proteins in human cancer. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:1035188. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1035188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Tsourouktsoglou T.D., Warnatsch A., Ioannou M., Hoving D., Wang Q., Papayannopoulos V. Histones, DNA, and citrullination promote neutrophil extracellular trap inflammation by regulating the localization and activation of TLR4. Cell Rep. 2020;31(5):107602. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Sanchez-Pernaute O., Filkova M., Gabucio A., Klein M., Maciejewska-Rodrigues H., Ospelt C., Brentano F., Michel B.A., Gay R.E., Herrero-Beaumont G., Gay S., Neidhart M., Juengel A. Citrullination enhances the pro-inflammatory response to fibrin in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013;72(8):1400–1406. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Saifi M.A., Ho I.C. Citrullination of matrisomal proteins in health and diseases. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2023;378(1890):20220244. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Thiele G.M., Duryee M.J., Hunter C.D., England B.R., Fletcher B.S., Daubach E.C., Pospisil T.P., Klassen L.W., Mikuls T.R. Immunogenic and inflammatory responses to citrullinated proteins are enhanced following modification with malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adducts. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020;83:106433. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Martín Monreal M.T., Rebak A.S., Massarenti L., Mondal S., Šenolt L., Ødum N., Nielsen M.L., Thompson P.R., Nielsen C.H., Damgaard D. Applicability of small- molecule inhibitors in the study of peptidyl arginine deiminase 2 (PAD2) and PAD4. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:716250. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.716250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Lewis H.D., Liddle J., Coote J.E., Atkinson S.J., Barker M.D., Bax B.D., Bicker K.L., Bingham R.P., Campbell M., Chen Y.H., Chung C., Craggs P.D., Davis R.P., Eberhard D., Joberty G., Lind K.E., Locke K., Maller C., Martinod K., Patten C., Polyakova O., Rise C.E., Rüdiger M., Sheppard R.J., Slade D.J., Thomas P., Thorpe J., Yao G., Drewes G., Wagner D.D., Thompson P.R., Prinjha R.K., Wilson D.M. Inhibition of PAD4 activity is sufficient to disrupt mouse and human NET formation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015;11(3):189–191. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Deng H., Lin C., Garcia-Gerique L., Fu S., Cruz Z., Bonner E.E., Rosenwasser M., Rajagopal S., Sadhu M.N., Gajendran C., Zainuddin M., Gosu R., Sivanandhan D., Shelef M.A., Nam B., Vogl D.T., Gabrilovich D.I., Nefedova Y. A novel selective inhibitor JBI-589 targets PAD4-mediated neutrophil migration to suppress tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2022;82(19):3561–3572. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-4045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Gajendran C., Fukui S., Sadhu N.M., Zainuddin M., Rajagopal S., Gosu R., Gutch S., Fukui S., Sheehy C.E., Chu L., Vishwakarma S., Jeyaraj D.A., Hallur G., Wagner D.D., Sivanandhan D. Alleviation of arthritis through prevention of neutrophil extracellular traps by an orally available inhibitor of protein arginine deiminase 4. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1):3189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30246-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Heger L.A., Schommer N., Fukui S., Van Bruggen S., Sheehy C.E., Chu L., Rajagopal S., Sivanandhan D., Ewenstein B., Wagner D.D. Inhibition of protein arginine deiminase 4 prevents inflammation-mediated heart failure in arthritis. Life Sci. Alliance. 2023;6(10):e202302055. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202302055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Du M., Yang W., Schmull S., Gu J., Xue S. Inhibition of peptidyl arginine deiminase-4 protects against myocardial infarction induced cardiac dysfunction. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020;78:106055. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.106055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Molinaro R., Yu M., Sausen G., Bichsel C.A., Corbo C., Folco E.J., Lee G.Y., Liu Y., Tesmenitsky Y., Shvartz E., Sukhova G.K., Kloss F., Croce K.J., Farokhzad O.C., Shi J., Libby P. Targeted delivery of protein arginine deiminase-4 inhibitors to limit arterial intimal NETosis and preserve endothelial integrity. Cardiovasc. Res. 2021;117(13):cvab074. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Perdomo J., Leung H.H.L., Ahmadi Z., Yan F., Chong J.J.H., Passam F.H., Chong B.H. Neutrophil activation and NETosis are the major drivers of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):1322. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09160-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Hu Z., Hua X., Mo X., Chang Y., Chen X., Xu Z., Tao M., Hu G., Song J. Inhibition of NETosis via PAD4 alleviated inflammation in giant cell myocarditis. iScience. 2023;26(7):107162. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Marfella R., Prattichizzo F., Sardu C., Paolisso P., D’Onofrio N., Scisciola L., La Grotta R., Frigé C., Ferraraccio F., Panarese I., Fanelli M., Modugno P., Calafiore A.M., Melchionna M., Sasso F.C., Furbatto F., D’Andrea D., Siniscalchi M., Mauro C., Cesaro A., Calabrò P., Santulli G., Balestrieri M.L., Barbato E., Ceriello A., Paolisso G. Evidence of an anti-inflammatory effect of PCSK9 inhibitors within the human atherosclerotic plaque. Atherosclerosis. 2023;378:117180. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.06.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Sardu C., Trotta M.C., Sasso F.C., Sacra C., Carpinella G., Mauro C., Minicucci F., Calabrò P., D’ Amico M., D’ Ascenzo F., De Filippo O., Iannaccone M., Pizzi C., Paolisso G., Marfella R. SGLT2-inhibitors effects on the coronary fibrous cap thickness and MACEs in diabetic patients with inducible myocardial ischemia and multi vessels non-obstructive coronary artery stenosis. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2023;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01814-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Sardu C., Massetti M., Testa N., Martino L.D., Castellano G., Turriziani F., Sasso F.C., Torella M., De Feo M., Santulli G., Paolisso G., Marfella R. Effects of sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I) in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) treated by coronary artery bypass grafting via MiECC: Inflammatory burden, and clinical outcomes at 5 years of follow-up. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:777083. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.777083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Sardu C., Consiglia Trotta M., Santella B., D’Onofrio N., Barbieri M., Rizzo M.R., Sasso F.C., Scisciola L., Turriziani F., Torella M., Portoghese M., Loreni F., Mureddu S., Lepore M.A., Galdiero M., Franci G., Folliero V., Petrillo A., Boatti L., Minicucci F., Mauro C., Calabrò P., Feo M.D., Balestrieri M.L., Ercolini D., D’Amico M., Paolisso G., Galdiero M., Marfella R. Microbiota thrombus colonization may influence athero-thrombosis in hyperglycemic patients with ST segment elevation myocardialinfarction (STEMI). Marianella study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2021;173:108670. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

CMC-33-9-1730_SD1.pdf (18.7MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD035173. Other data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Current Medicinal Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES