Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1991 Mar;55(2):133–143. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-133

Economic substitutability of electrical brain stimulation, food, and water.

L Green 1, H Rachlin 1
PMCID: PMC1323050  PMID: 2037823

Abstract

Concurrent variable-ratio schedules of electrical brain stimulation, food, and water were paired in various combinations as reinforcement of rats' lever presses. Relative prices of the concurrent reinforcers were varied by changing the ratio of the response requirements on the two levers. Economic substitutability, measured by the sensitivity of response ratio to changes in relative price, was highest with brain stimulation reinforcement of presses on both levers and lowest with food reinforcement of presses on one lever and water reinforcement of presses on the other. Substitutability with brain stimulation reinforcement of presses on one lever and either food or water reinforcement for presses on the other was about as high as with brain stimulation for presses on both levers. Electrical brain stimulation for rats may thus serve as an economic substitute for two reinforcers, neither of which is substitutable for the other.

Full text

PDF
133

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis A. H., Davison M. C., Webster D. M. Intracranial reinforcement in pigeons: an analysis using concurrent schedules. Physiol Behav. 1972 Sep;9(3):385–390. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(72)90164-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FALK J. L. Septal stimulation as a reinforcer of and an alternative to consumatory behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:213–217. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Green L., Kagel J. H., Battalio R. C. Consumption-leisure tradeoffs in pigeons: Effects of changing marginal wage rates by varying amount of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jan;47(1):17–28. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Green L., Rachlin H., Hanson J. Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Nov;40(3):217–224. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HAWKINS T. D., PLISKOFF S. S. BRAIN-STIMULATION INTENSITY, RATE OF SELF-STIMULATION, AND REINFORCEMENT STRENGTH: AN ANALYSIS THROUGH CHAINING. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:285–288. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HODOS W., VALENSTEIN E. S. An evaluation of response rate as a measure of rewarding intracranial stimulation. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Feb;55:80–84. doi: 10.1037/h0047681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOEBEL B. G., TEITELBAUM P. Hypothalamic control of feeding and self-stimulation. Science. 1962 Feb 2;135(3501):375–377. doi: 10.1126/science.135.3501.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herrnstein R. J., Loveland D. H. Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):107–116. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hollard V., Davison M. C. Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Nov;16(3):375–380. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hursh S. R., Natelson B. H. Electrical brain stimulation and food reinforcement dissociated by demand elasticity. Physiol Behav. 1981 Mar;26(3):509–515. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(81)90180-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hursh S. R. The economics of daily consumption controlling food- and water-reinforced responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):475–491. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller H. L. Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):335–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. OLDS J., MILNER P. Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Dec;47(6):419–427. doi: 10.1037/h0058775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. OLDS J. Self-stimulation of the brain; its use to study local effects of hunger, sex, and drugs. Science. 1958 Feb 14;127(3294):315–324. doi: 10.1126/science.127.3294.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rachlin H. A molar theory of reinforcement schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Nov;30(3):345–360. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SIDMAN M., BRADY J. V., BOREN J. J., CONRAD D. G., SCHULMAN A. Reward schedules and behavior maintained by intracranial self-stimulation. Science. 1955 Oct 28;122(3174):830–831. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3174.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Spies G. Food versus intracranial self-stimulation reinforcement in food-deprived rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Oct;60(2):153–157. doi: 10.1037/h0022367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES