Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether simple additions to the home cages of rats made those cages preferable to standard housing arrangements. Results indicated that most rats preferred cages with wood platforms, wood chips, and paper towels to otherwise identical cages without these items. Wood chips were not, however, practical with the cages used in the present study. Plastic pipes caused no problems but were not preferred by most animals. Both wood platforms and paper towels created no problems and appeared to be useful as enrichment items. The latter were preferred to the former in a direct comparison.
Keywords: nonhuman research, animal welfare, housing conditions, preference, rats
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Feeney D. M. Human rights and animal welfare. Am Psychol. 1987 Jun;42(6):593–599. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.42.6.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallup G. G., Jr, Suarez S. D. Alternatives to the use of animals in psychological research. Am Psychol. 1985 Oct;40(10):1104–1111. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.40.10.1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hineline P. N. The relationships between subject and experimenter (Editorial). J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Mar;45(2):123–127. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller N. E. The value of behavioral research on animals. Am Psychol. 1985 Apr;40(4):423–440. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.40.4.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novak M. A., Suomi S. J. Psychological well-being of primates in captivity. Am Psychol. 1988 Oct;43(10):765–773. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.43.10.765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Segal E. Editorial. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):115–115. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]