Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1991 Sep;56(2):313–329. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-313

Effects of schedule of reinforcement on a pentobarbital discrimination in rats.

S H Snodgrass 1, D E McMillan 1
PMCID: PMC1323105  PMID: 1955819

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the schedule of reinforcement on a pentobarbital discrimination in rats. Five rats were trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg pentobarbital from saline under a multiple fixed-interval 180-s fixed-ratio 20 schedule of reinforcement. During both saline and pentobarbital training sessions, subjects emitted a higher percentage of correct responses under the fixed-ratio component as compared to the fixed-interval component of the multiple schedule. Determination of the pentobarbital dose-response curve under the fixed-ratio component resulted in a steep curve characterized by responding on the saline lever at low doses and on the drug lever at higher doses. Under the fixed-interval component, a graded dose-effect curve was produced, with considerable responding on both levers after intermediate doses of pentobarbital. The administration of phencyclidine and MK-801 resulted in an intermediate level of drug-lever responding for some subjects. Administration of d-amphetamine resulted in saline (nondrug) appropriate responding. The results of this study demonstrate that the schedule of reinforcement is a determinant of drug stimulus control, just as it is a determinant of other drug effects.

Full text

PDF
313

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickel W. K., Etzel B. C. The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):245–270. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. De Vry J., Koek W., Slangen J. L. Effects of drug-induced differences in reinforcement frequency on discriminative stimulus properties of fentanyl. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1984;83(3):257–261. doi: 10.1007/BF00464790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gouvier W. D., Akins F. R., Trapold M. A. Assessment of drug state dimensionality via drug-drug training and stimulus generalization testing. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Nov;21(5):687–693. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(84)80003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herrnstein R. J., Loveland D. H. Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):107–116. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krimmer E. C., McGuire M. S., Barry H., 3rd Effects of the training dose on generalization of morphine stimulus to clonidine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 May;20(5):669–673. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(84)90182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kubena R. K., Barry H., 3rd Two procedures for training differential responses in alcohol and nondrug conditions. J Pharm Sci. 1969 Jan;58(1):99–101. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600580121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Massey B. W., McMillan D. E. Effects of body weight on discriminative-stimulus control by phencyclidine in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Mar;47(2):233–239. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mathis D. A., Emmett-Oglesby M. W. Quantal vs. graded generalization in drug discrimination: measuring a graded response. J Neurosci Methods. 1990 Jan;31(1):23–33. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(90)90005-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McCarthy D., Davison M. On the discriminability of stimulus duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):187–211. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McMillan D. E., Cole-Fullenwider D. A., Hardwick W. C., Wenger G. R. Phencyclidine discrimination in the pigeon using color tracking under second-order schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):143–147. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McMillan D. E., Wenger G. R. Bias of phencyclidine discrimination by the schedule of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jul;42(1):51–66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McMillan D. E., Wenger G. R. Effects of barbiturates and other sedative hypnotics in pigeons trained to discriminate phencyclidine from saline. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Sep;40(2):133–142. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. White A. J., Davison M. C. Performance in concurrent fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):147–153. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Willetts J., Balster R. L. Pentobarbital-like discriminative stimulus effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989 May;249(2):438–443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Witkin J. M., Carter R. B., Dykstra L. A. Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1980;68(3):269–276. doi: 10.1007/BF00428114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES