Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1991 Nov;56(3):575–584. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-575

Human choice on concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules.

A Silberberg 1, J R Thomas 1, N Berendzen 1
PMCID: PMC1323139  PMID: 1774545

Abstract

Each of 5 adult male humans sat in a 4 degrees C room where they could warm themselves by illuminating six heat lamps for 10-second periods according to a concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedule. Left-button presses on a response panel switched between the schedules and started a 2-second changeover delay. Right-button presses illuminated the heat lamps if assigned by the associated schedule and if the changeover delay had timed out. Panel lights identified the schedule in effect and each effective right-button press. A discrimination procedure--either a multiple variable-interval variable-ratio schedule or the presentation of each schedule individually on alternate days--preceded exposure to the choice procedure for some subjects. For subjects not exposed to a discrimination procedure prior to exposure to choice, or if such exposure failed to result in higher rates to the ratio than to the interval schedule, relative response rates matched relative reinforcement rates. However, if subjects responded at higher rates to the ratio schedule than to the interval schedule during a prior discrimination procedure, relative rates on a subsequent choice procedure deviated from matching in the direction of reinforcement-rate maximizing. In eight of 11 conditions, choice appeared to be governed by maximizing processes. In all cases, human concurrent ratio-interval performances differed from those of nonhumans in that matching was never obtained with local ratio-interval rate differences.

Full text

PDF
575

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bentall R. P., Lowe C. F., Beasty A. The role of verbal behavior in human learning: II. Developmental differences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Mar;43(2):165–181. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Catania A. C., Matthews B. A., Shimoff E. Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):233–248. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Green L., Rachlin H., Hanson J. Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Nov;40(3):217–224. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hastjarjo T., Silberberg A., Hursh S. R. Quinine pellets as an inferior good and a Giffen good in rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):263–271. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herrnstein R. J., Heyman G. M. Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio? J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Mar;31(2):209–223. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heyman G. M., Herrnstein R. J. More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules: a replication and review. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):331–351. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Logue A. W., Peña-Correal T. E., Rodriguez M. L., Kabela E. Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Sep;46(2):159–173. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Long E. R., Hammack J. T., May F., Campbell B. J. Intermittent reinforcement of operant behavior in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Oct;1(4):315–339. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lowe C. F., Harzem P., Bagshaw M. Species differences in temporal control of behavior II: human performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):351–361. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lowe C. F., Harzem P., Hughes S. Determinats of operant behavior in humans: some differences from animals. Q J Exp Psychol. 1978 May;30(2):373–386. doi: 10.1080/14640747808400684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Matthews B. A., Shimoff E., Catania A. C., Sagvolden T. Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):453–467. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sakagami T., Hursh S. R., Christensen J., Silberberg A. Income maximizing in concurrent interval-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jul;52(1):41–46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shurtleff D., Silberberg A. Income maximizing on concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):273–284. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shurtleff D., Warren-Boulton F. R., Silberberg A. Income and choice between different goods. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):263–275. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Silberberg A., Warren-Boulton F. R., Asano T. Maximizing present value: A model to explain why moderate response rates obtain on variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):331–338. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weiner H. Controlling human fixed-interval performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):349–373. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ziriax J. M., Silberberg A. Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules can provide only weak evidence for matching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):83–100. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES