Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1992 May;57(3):289–299. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-289

Computational behavior dynamics: an alternative description of Nevin (1969).

C P Shimp 1
PMCID: PMC1323231  PMID: 1602268

Abstract

A computational processing behavior-dynamic model was instantiated in the form of a computer program that "behaved" on the task developed by Nevin (1969). In this classic discrete-trials experiment, the relative frequency of choosing a response alternative matched the relative frequency of reinforcement for that alternative, the local structure of responding was opposite that predicted by momentary maximizing (i.e., the probability of a changeover decreased with run length), and absolute and relative response rates varied independently. The behavior-dynamic model developed here qualitatively reproduced these three results (but not in quantitative and specific detail) and also generated some interesting, as-yet-untested predictions about performance in Nevin's task. The model was discussed as an example of a stochastic behavior-dynamic alternative to algebraic behavior theory.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kehoe E. J. Connectionist models of conditioning: A tutorial. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):427–440. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nevin J. A. Interval reinforcement of choice behavior in discrete trials. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):875–885. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shimp C. P., Childers L. J., Hightower F. A. Local patterns in human operant behavior and a behaving model to interrelate animal and human performances. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Apr;16(2):200–212. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.16.2.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shimp C. P. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):443–455. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wearden J. H., Burgess I. S. Matching since Baum (1979). J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):339–348. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Williams B. A. Enduring problems for molecular accounts of operant behavior. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Apr;16(2):213–221. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.16.2.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES