Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2026 Jan 25;392:114661. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2026.114661

A Proimmunotoxin Nanodrug Targeting AIDS-associated non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Shilin Chen a,b,c,1, Tong Qi a,b,c,1, Hongxu Peng a,b, Eugene Kimura a,b, Xiang Zhang d, Emiko Kranz a,b, Zheng Cao a,b,c, Zi Wang b,c, Wenting Chen b,c, Leonardo R Ancheta e, Douglas A Lappi e, Pei-Yu Chiou d, Yunfeng Lu b,#, Tracy R Daniels-Wells f,*, Manuel L Penichet a,b,f,g,h,*, Jing Wen a,b,h,i,*
PMCID: PMC13235839  NIHMSID: NIHMS2173706  PMID: 41592623

Abstract

B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is the most common hematopoietic malignancy in the United States, with a notably higher incidence and aggressiveness observed in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), leading to AIDS-associated NHL (AIDS-NHL). The transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1/CD71), a type II transmembrane homodimeric protein, is overexpressed on several cancers, including NHL, providing a meaningful therapeutic target. Our group developed an anti-TfR1 IgG3-avidin fusion protein, ch128.1Av, designed to deliver biotinylated therapeutic agents into cancer cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis. When coupled with biotinylated saporin 6 (b-SO6), a plant-derived protein synthesis inhibitor, the resulting ch128.1Av/b-SO6 immunotoxin is highly effective at killing malignant cells. However, toxicity to normal cells limits its systemic administration. To overcome this problem, we developed a proimmunotoxin nanodrug, named “n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13”. This strategy involves encapsulating individual immunotoxins within a thin zwitterionic polymer shell, which is stabilized by peptide crosslinkers that only respond to metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), a tumor microenvironment-specific enzyme. The nanodrug is further conjugated with a B-cell targeting chemokine CXCL13. This design allows the proimmunotoxin to circulate safely, specifically accumulate and release encapsulated ch128.1Av/b-SO6 intratumorally in response to MMP-2. This approach not only minimizes off-target toxicity but also enhances tissue penetration by enabling choline analogues on proimmunotoxin nanodrugs to bind choline transporters expressed on tumor cells or the blood-brain barrier. Importantly, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 demonstrated antitumor efficacy in an AIDS-associated NHL xenograft mouse model. Taken together, our results suggest that n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13, or similar proimmunotoxin strategies, represents a promising therapeutic avenue for AIDS-NHL and potentially other malignancies.

Keywords: Immunotoxin, Transferrin receptor 1, Saporin 6, Proimmunotoxin nanodrug, Polymer nanoencapsulation, Tumor microenvironment specificity

1. Introduction

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) represents a heterogeneous group of blood cancers originating from lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell crucial for immune system function [1]. As one of the most prevalent hematopoietic malignancies in the United States, NHL encompasses a diverse array of subtypes, each characterized by distinct pathological and clinical features. This heterogeneity poses significant challenges in diagnosis, classification, and treatment, highlighting the need for targeted therapeutic strategies. In 2025, an estimated 80,350 new NHL cases and 19,390 deaths were reported [2]. Among the population, individuals with congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, such as those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, are at increased risk of developing B-cell NHL [3, 4]. Notably, NHL has been classified as an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining cancer since 1985 [5]. Although the incidence of AIDS-associated NHL (AIDS-NHL) has significantly declined in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), it remains the most common HIV-related malignancy in developed countries [6, 7]. Compared to individuals who are HIV-negative, people living with HIV and AIDS-NHL tend to present with aggressive, advanced-stage disease at a younger median age and frequently exhibit extranodal involvement, including the central nervous system (CNS) [8, 9]. Furthermore, AIDS-NHL is further complicated by its frequent association with oncogenic viruses, such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8) [10, 11], underscoring the need for more effective and targeted therapeutic strategies.

Transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1, also known as CD71) is a Type II transmembrane, homodimeric glycoprotein responsible for cellular iron uptake via the interaction with iron-loaded transferrin (Tf), the main iron transporter in blood [12–15]. While TfR1 is expressed at low levels in various normal tissues, its expression is significantly elevated in rapidly proliferating cells, such as cancer cells, including NHL [12–18]. Notably, AIDS-NHL exhibits even higher TfR1 mRNA levels compared to NHL cells from non-infected individuals [19, 20]. In general, cancer cells overexpress TfR1, supporting its consideration as a universal cancer marker candidate and both TfR1 and iron have been shown to contribute to cancer cell survival [15] [21]. Given its overexpression on cancer cells, capacity for internalization, and central role in cancer cell pathophysiology, TfR1 presents a compelling target for therapeutic intervention [14, 15].

We previously developed a mouse/human chimeric IgG3-avidin fusion protein specific for human TfR1, ch128.1Av (previously named anti-hTfR IgG3-Av), as a universal vector to deliver a variety of biotinylated agents into cancer cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis (RME) [15, 22, 23]. Chicken avidin was genetically fused to the CH3 domain of the antibody. We found that the antibody-avidin fusion protein is dimeric in solution [22], due to the natural tetrameric structure of avidin [24], which facilitates the binding of two antibody molecules. Each avidin unit is capable of binding one biotin molecule with high affinity, allowing the dimeric fusion protein to potentially bind up to four biotinylated compounds [25]. Human IgG3 was selected for its unique extended hinge region, which provides spacing and flexibility [26, 27], facilitating antigen and a biotinylated compound binding simultaneously. Notably, both ch128.1Av and its parental antibody, ch128.1, do not inhibit the binding of transferrin or the hemochromatosis protein (HFE: another TfR1 ligand) to TfR1 [28, 29], indicating that the antibody is non-neutralizing [13, 15]. The parental anti-TfR1 antibody (ch128.1/IgG3) exhibits high-affinity antigen binding (KD 5.7 nM) with a binding site mapped to an epitope located within the apical domain of the human TfR1 [30]. Anti-TfR1 antibodies, like ch128.1/IgG3, can be directly cytotoxic to cells through the inhibition of iron uptake by various mechanisms. Intriguingly, we found that fusing avidin to ch128.1/IgG3 enhances its direct cytotoxicity and induces TfR1 degradation, leading to subsequent lethal iron starvation in certain malignant hematopoietic cells [22, 23, 31]. We also found that administration of ch128.1Av alone results in significant antitumor activity in immunosuppressed mice (SCID-Beige) bearing disseminated human B-cell malignancy multiple myeloma (MM) cells, regardless of the in vitro sensitivity of the cell line [32]. However, the parental antibody without avidin (ch128.1/IgG3) shows superior in vivo antitumor activity, despite its lower direct in vitro cytotoxicity compared to ch128.1Av [32], which is explained by the lower bioavailability of ch128.1Av, as it contains avidin and is cleared faster from blood [33]. This mechanism of antitumor activity in vivo was found to be Fc-mediated (i.e., antibody effector functions), involving macrophages, capable of triggering antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) [34, 35]. The Fc region has also been found to be critical for the in vivo antitumor activity of the IgG1 version of this antibody (ch128.1/IgG1) in xenograft models of MM [34]. More recently and consistent with the studies using human MM cells, we showed that ch128.1/IgG1 and its humanized counterpart, hu128.1, exhibit antitumor activity in SCID-Beige models bearing local or disseminated AIDS-NHL Burkitt lymphoma (BL) cells [2F7-BR44 (EBV+) or JB (EBV-) cells] [36]. However, it is well established that not all tumor types respond equally to anti-TfR1 antibodies, and even those that may eventually develop resistance [15]. In this context, it is of interest to explore the use of TfR1-specific antibodies and their derivatives, conjugated with antitumor agents, for targeted delivery into cancer cells via RME [13, 37].

One promising approach to eliminate malignant cells involves conjugating ch128.1Av with a toxin. Saporin, a plant toxin produced by Saponaria officinalis, is a Type I ribosome-inactivating protein (RIP) [38–40]. This protein synthesis inhibitor is of great interest in cancer therapy [40, 41]. Saporin is a gene family composed of several isoforms. The saporin-6 (SO6) isoform is isolated from the seeds of the plant and is commonly used for in the generation of immunotoxins[42]. Although all isoforms of saporin lack a cell-binding domain and therefore cannot efficiently enter cells, conjugating ch128.1Av with monobiotinylated saporin 6 (b-SO6) to form the immunotoxin ch128.1Av/b-SO6, markedly increases cytotoxicity in malignant B cells sensitive to the direct effects of ch128.1Av and also induces cell death in cells that are not sensitive to the direct effects of the antibody fusion protein [25, 43]. Protein synthesis inhibition but not iron starvation is responsible for the cytotoxicity induced by ch128.1Av/b-SO6 [43]. However, systemic administration of saporin as part of an immunotoxin containing an antibody targeting TfR1 is expected to result in toxicity to normal cells, especially those expressing TfR1. In addition, although saporin does not have a cell-binding chain, it is possible to have non-specific cell uptake without an “escort”, such as through bulk-phase endocytosis [44]. Moreover, the positive charge of avidin increases the likelihood of non-specific interactions with negatively charged structures, such as cell membranes, potentially leading to internalization into normal cells [45, 46].

A potential strategy to mitigate these drawbacks is the use of nanotechnology, which has been broadly explored for this purpose. Attaching polyethylene glycol (PEG) to therapeutic proteins can mask immunogenic epitopes, reduce renal clearance, and prolong circulation time [47]. However, direct PEGylation may compromise the immunotoxin activity [48], and previous attempts showed minimal benefits [49]. Numerous strategies using site-specific PEGylation have been developed, but have not shown success in clinical studies. Alternatively, biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles, designed to improve the therapeutic properties of drugs, provide a practical means to reduce the toxic side effects of immunotoxins. Immunotoxin-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles modified with antibodies have demonstrated improved therapeutic efficacy against breast cancer and increased maximally tolerated doses compared to free immunotoxins [50]. Despite these advancements, achieving tumor-specific release of nanoparticle loaded immunotoxins remains a significant challenge.

In this study, we engineered a proimmunotoxin nanodrug, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13, aiming to release the immunotoxin into the tumor microenvironment (TME) of AIDS-NHL and therefore, decreasing off-target toxicities while enhancing tumor targeting. This nanodrug is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and thus, is expected to be effective again brain metastases. This nanoplatform encapsulates the immunotoxin within a thin polymer shell formed via in situ polymerization of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) with a choline analogue, enhancing tumor penetration and BBB translocation [51–54]. The structure is stabilized by peptide crosslinkers responsive to tumor-associated metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) [55], enabling controlled release in the TME. Incorporating choline analogues into the shell facilitates enhanced penetration into solid tumors and across the BBB via choline transporters (ChTs). Conjugation with CXCL13, a chemokine targeting CXCR5-expressing B cells, further improves tumor selectivity and mitigates off-target toxicity. Overall, these findings indicate that the present nanocapsule strategy is a promising proimmunotoxin approach against AIDS-NHL and possibly other cancers including those with CNS involvement.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Materials

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), unless otherwise specified. Cell culture materials were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), unless otherwise specified. NHS-PEG4-Azide, Zeocin®, Hoechst 33342, HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG Fc cross-adsorbed secondary antibody and mouse IgG total ELISA Ready-SET-Go! Kit were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. ELISA reagents, including anti-human IgG antibody, HRP-conjugated donkey anti-human IgG, and 3, 3’, 5, 5’ tetramethyl benzidine (TMB), were purchased from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA). The CellTiter-Blue® Cell Viability Assay and the CytoTox-Glo™ Cytotoxicity Assay were purchased from Promega Corporation (Madison, WI, USA). Recombinant human CXCL13 chemokine was purchased from Peprotech (Cranbury, NJ, USA), and Matrigel® matrix basement membrane was purchased from Corning (Corning, NY, USA). [3H]-thymidine was obtained from MP Biomedicals (Santa Ana, CA, USA) for the thymidine incorporation assay.

2.2. Synthesis of nanodrugs

Production of the anti-TfR1 antibody-avidin fusion protein (ch128.1Av) in murine myeloma cells has been described previously [25]. An isotype control IgG3-avidin fusion protein (IgGAv) specific for the hapten dansyl ([5-dimethylamino naphthalene-1-sulfonyl chloride) was also produced in murine myeloma cells [25]. b-SO6 was manufactured by Advanced Targeting Systems (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The ch128.1Av/b-SO6 and the isotype control IgGAv/b-SO6 immunotoxins were obtained through the avidin-biotin interaction between the fusion protein and b-SO6 at the molar ratio of 1:1 on ice for 30 mins as described [25]. Nanodrugs of model protein bovine serum albumin (BSA) or immunotoxin ch128.1Av/b-SO6 were synthesized. Monomer and crosslinker solutions were freshly prepared, degassed, and added to 1 mg/mL of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 or BSA in 50 mM HEPES buffer at a molar ratio of MPC:APM:crosslinker:ch128.1Av/b-SO6 or BSA (12000:100:1000:1, n/n). Degradable nanodrugs were synthesized using vinyl-functionalized peptide crosslinkers (PQGIAGQ), whereas non-degradable nanodrugs were prepared using N,N’-methylene-bisacrylamide (BIS). Free radical polymerization was initiated using ammonium persulfate (APS) and N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED), with an APS:ch128.1Av/b-SO6 or BSA ratio of 500:1 (n/n) and a TEMED:APS ratio of 2:1 (w/w), carried out on ice for two hrs. The synthesized n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) or n(BSA) was purified and concentrated using Spectrum™ Dialysis Membrane Tubing (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MWCO:12 kDa) at 4 °C overnight. The proimmunotoxin n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) or n(BSA) was conjugated with CXCL13 via copper-free click chemistry to synthesize n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 or n(BSA)-CXCL13. n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) or n(BSA) and CXCL13 were functionalized with DBCO-SS-NHS and NHS-PEG4-Azide, respectively, at a 10:1 molar ratio on ice for one hr. Purified DBCO-modified n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) or n(BSA) and azide-modified CXCL13 were reacted at 4° C for 17 hrs at a 1:1 molar ratio. The conjugation was confirmed using UV-VIS absorption with a OneC Microvolume Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific). The resulting n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 or n(BSA)-CXCL13 was purified using a Vivaspin® 500 centrifugal concentrator. The synthesis was confirmed via Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images acquired using a 120 kV T12 cryo-electron microscope (FEI), SDS-PAGE, and Dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern England).

2.3. Cell culture

The parental 2F7 AIDS-NHL cell line that harbors the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was a kind gift from Dr. Otoniel Martinez-Maza (University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) [56]. 2F7 cells were genetically modified to express both mCherry fluorescent protein and a luciferase reporter (firefly). After in vivo selection for brain metastases, the 2F7-BR44 single cell clone was selected [51, 52]. 2F7-BR44 cells were cultured in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM; Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S), and 50 μg/mL Zeocin®. To generate 3D tumor spheroids, 2F7-BR44 were cultured in growth media containing 5% (w/v) Matrigel® for 5 days. Jurkat cells, a human immortalized T lymphocyte cell line derived from a patient with T-cell leukemia, were purchased from ATCC (TIB-152™, Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in IMDM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S.

2.4. In vitro stability assays

The proteolytic stability of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was evaluated by incubating each formulation with trypsin (25 mg/mL) at 37 °C for up to 6 days. Samples were collected at 6 hrs, 12 hrs, and on Days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Following incubation, samples were digested overnight in IMDM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S, and the released native ch128.1Av/b-SO6 was quantified using ELISA. To assess the functional cytotoxic activity of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) following prolonged trypsin exposure, both formulations were pre-incubated with trypsin (25 mg/mL) at 37 °C for 6 days. The released immunotoxin was then incubated with 2F7-BR44 cells (104 cells/well) in culture medium at 37 °C for 24 hrs. Cell viability was determined by flow cytometry based on cell counts.

The storage stability of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was evaluated at 4 °C. Nanocapsule samples were stored at 4 °C for 7 days, and hydrodynamic diameter was measured daily using DLS to monitor potential aggregation or structural changes.

2.5. In vitro BBB transwell penetration assay

The in vitro BBB transwell assay with bEnd.3 cells (ATCC) was established according to the protocol previously developed by our group [51–53]. Briefly, bEnd.3 cells (105 cell per well) were seeded on the transwells with permeable polyester membrane and the integrity of bEnd.3 monolayer was confirmed by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER). When the TEER of the bEnd.3 transwells reached above 600 Ω·cm2, transcytosis of the nanocapsules across the bEnd.3 monolayer was performed. Native BSA and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled n(BSA) were added to the apical compartment and incubated at 37 °C. The fluorescence intensity of basolateral compartment was analyzed at various time points by an Infinite 200 PRO plate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland).

2.6. In vitro cytotoxicity activity

Cell proliferation under immunotoxin treatment was monitored using the [3H]-thymidine incorporation assay as described [25]. 2F7-BR44 cells were incubated with 0.1 or 1 nM ch128.1Av, b-SO6, ch128.1Av/b-SO6, IgGAv/b-SO6, or ch128.1 for 48 hrs in tissue culture conditions. The cells were incubated with0.5mCi/well [3H]-thymidine for the final 16 hrs of the treatment period. Radioactivity was determined as described previously [25]. Data are presented as a percentage of [3H]-thymidine incorporated into control cells treated with buffer only.

In vitro cytotoxicity activity was also tested using tumor spheroids. ch128.1Av/b-SO6 or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was added to the 2F7-BR44 spheroid culture media. Fluorescent images of 2F7-BR44 spheroids treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), ch128.1Av/b-SO6, or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) were taken at 24 and 48 hrs to evaluate cell viability by monitoring mCherry expression. Fluorescent imaging of cells and spheroids was imaged using a Leica SP8 fluorescent microscope or a Leica TCS-SP8-SMD confocal microscope (Leica, Boston, MA). Spheroid size under different treatments was measured using ImageJ software [57]. The penetration capability of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) into 3D tumor spheroids was examined using a Hoechst dye staining assay. 0.1 μM Hoechst 33342 was added for 15 mins, enabling differentiation of the core and outer layer based on the staining intensity at 104 relative fluorescent units (RFU) by flow cytometry analysis performed on the Fortessa (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) or Attune NxT flow cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Dual-chamber co-culture using the ibidi μ-Slide VI system (ibidi, Gradelfing, Germany) was employed to evaluate the targeting efficacy of proimmunotoxin nanodrugs. Targeted B-cell AIDS-NHL 2F7-BR44 cells were seeded in one chamber, while non-target Jurkat cells were seeded in an adjacent chamber, with both chambers connected by a central microchannel that permits passive diffusion. After culture medium was removed post 1-day culture, ch128.1Av/b-SO6, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 were introduced with 500 μL from non-target chamber and allowed to diffuse across the channel for 4 hrs. The samples were washed out by adding 1 mL fresh medium from non-target chamber and collecting medium from targeted chamber. The cell viability of each chamber was monitored by CytoTox-Glo™ cytotoxicity assays at Days 3, 5, 7 post-treatment and the specificity was calculated as: Cytotoxicity2F7-BR44 / CytotoxicityJurkat.

The microfluidic platform was established to mimic the environment of blood vessels in order to evaluate the targeting efficacy of the proimmunotoxin nanodrugs. The microfluidic device was fabricated using soft lithography with an SU-8 2000 series photoresist on a silicon wafer substrate. The wafer was developed in SU-8 developer (PGMEA) for five mins, rinsed with isopropanol, and dried with nitrogen gas. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was prepared by mixing the base and curing agent at a 10:1 ratio, degassed, and poured over the SU-8 mold, followed by overnight curing at room temperature. The cured PDMS layer was then peeled off and bonded to a glass slide or another PDMS layer using plasma treatment. The final device was inspected for channel integrity and tested for fluid flow using a syringe pump programmed to inject at 15 μL/min. Once the channel integrity was verified, 2F7-BR44 spheroids were introduced into the device at a flow rate of 15 μL/min using a syringe pump and incubated overnight in designated wells to establish individual tumor microenvironments.

2.7. Animal studies

All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, under a protocol approved by the UCLA Chancellor’s Animal Research Committee (ARC), in compliance with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC).

To evaluate safety, six-week-old male BALB/c mice purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) (n = 6) received a single intravenous (i.v.) dose of PBS, ch128.1Av/b-SO6 (4 mg/kg), or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) (4 mg/kg) through the tail vein, with dosing normalized to the ch128.1Av content. Blood samples were collected on Days 0, 1, 3, 7, 10, 14. Plasma ALT (alanine transaminase) levels were measured using an enzyme activity assay kit (Abcam, Cat. No. ab105134) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to assess hepatic toxicity.

To assess the immunogenicity of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) and its native counterpart ch128.1Av/b-SO6, plasma samples at Day 14 post-treatment from biosafety studies were analyzed by ELISA. Total IgG levels were measured using the mouse IgG total ELISA Ready-SET-Go! Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against the b-SO6 component of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 were quantified using a sandwich ELISA. High-binding 96-well plates were coated overnight with soluble b-SO6, blocked with 1% BSA, and then incubated with plasma samples (diluted to 1:50 with PBS). Bound ADA was detected using an HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG Fc cross-adsorbed secondary antibody, followed by TMB substrate development and absorbance measurement at 450 nm.

To evaluate the in vivo antitumor activity, six-week-old male NOD/SCID/IL-2Rγnull (NSG) mice were purchased from the The Jackson Laboratory and maintained in a pathogen-free facility at UCLA. NSG mice were xenografted intravenously (i.v.) via the tail vein with 106 2F7-BR44 cells. In animal study set I, designed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), mice were randomized into three groups and treated i.v. with either PBS, 0.1 mg/kg of ch128.1Av/b-SO6, or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) (n = 6) on Days 7 and 21 post-tumor xenograft. The study was repeated in mice treated with PBS (n = 3), 0.1 mg/kg of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 (n = 4), or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) (n = 4). In animal study set II, aimed at evaluating the efficacy of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13, mice were randomized into four groups and treated i.v. via the tail vein with either PBS, 1 mg/kg ch128.1Av/b-SO6, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 (n = 6), on Days 7 and 21 post-tumor xenograft. The study was repeated in mice treated with PBS (n = 3), 1 mg/kg of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 (n = 6), n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) (n = 7), or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 (n = 7).

Longitudinal tumor progression in AIDS-NHL mice was monitored weekly for four weeks using an IVIS Lumina II Imaging System (Revvity, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) at the UCLA Crump Preclinical Imaging Technology Center and analyzed with Living Image Software (Revvity, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). In vivo bioluminescence imaging was performed following intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 4.5 mg D-luciferin (Gold Biotechnology, Cat. No. LUCNA) and tumor burden was quantified as total bioluminescent intensity (BLI) per second within a region of interest (whole body or head area); identically sized regions of interest were used for all measurements. Mice were euthanized upon meeting any of the following criteria: I) total BLI exceeding 1011 (photons/sec/cm2/sr), II) body weight loss exceeding 20%, or III) at the end of the study (Day 35). Survival was assessed based on the time from tumor challenge to euthanasia, and differences in survival were determined using a log-rank test. Tumor-bearing organs, including the kidneys, bone marrow (BM), brain, spleen, were harvested and processed for flow cytometry analysis of mCherry-expressing 2F7-BR44 cells. Set II plasma samples collected at end of the study were used to monitor liver toxicity using enzyme activity assay kits for ALT (Abcam, Cat. No. ab105134), AST (aspartate aminotransferase) (Abcam, Cat. No. ab105135), and ALP (lkaline phosphatase) (Abcam, Cat. No. ab83369) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

To assess the tumor targeting of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 in vivo, mice were i.v. administered Cy5.5-labeled BSA or n(BSA)-CXCL13 at a dose of 1 mg/kg via at Week 2 post-tumor xenograft (n = 3). Both tumor burden monitored by bioluminescence imaging and label samples tracked by fluorescence imaging were performed 24 hrs post-injection using an IVIS Lumina II system (Revvity), and data were analyzed using Living Image software (Revvity).

2.8. Statistical analysis

Measurements in this study were obtained from distinct samples. Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA) was used to perform all statistical analysis. All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was calculated via an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (*p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.005, and ****p <0.001), Mann-Whitney U test (*p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.005, and ****p <0.001) or two-way ANOVA (*p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.005, and ****p <0.001). The survival curve was generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was assessed using the log-rank test.

Results

Synthesis and characterization of proimmunotoxin nanodrugs

The native immunotoxin, ch128.1Av/b-SO6, was prepared via an avidin-biotin interaction between ch128.1Av and b-SO6 with a molar ratio of 1:1. The fusion protein consists of an IgG3 molecule fused to two avidin molecules through the CH3 domains (Supplemental Fig. S1) [25]. Notably, the aggressive AIDS-NHL 2F7-BR44 cell line, which is resistant to the direct cytotoxic effects of ch128.1Av, was confirmed to be highly susceptible to ch128.1Av/b-SO6 (Supplemental Fig. S2).

To mitigate the concerns regarding toxicity of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 to normal cells expressing TfR1, we synthesized a proimmunotoxin nanodrug using a nanotechnology-based approach, whereby individual macromolecules are encapsulated within a thin polymer shell, termed a nanocapsule [51–54]. Inspired by the active transport of choline from blood into the brain and tumors [58, 59], we developed a nanocapsule formulation incorporating choline analogues and zwitterionic polymers, enabling increased stability and interaction with ChTs that are highly expressed on the BBB and in tumors. This ChT-mediated uptake mechanism facilitates effective penetration of tumors and crossing of the BBB [51–54].

As illustrated in Fig. 1A, we produced, for the first time, nanocapsules containing the immunotoxin ch128.1Av/b-SO6 to form the proimmunotoxin n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) in two steps. First (Step I), MPC monomers, containing a choline analogue and zwitterionic structure, along with tumor-specific peptide crosslinkers (PQGIAGQ), which are selectively cleaved by MMP-2 [55], were concentrated around individual ch128.1Av/b-SO6 molecules. Next (Step II), in situ polymerization was performed to encapsulate ch128.1Av/b-SO6, forming the proimmunotoxin nanodrug n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6). The resulting nanodrug is expected to be inert and highly stable, resistant to nonspecific protein adsorption, and show reduced immunogenicity, thereby effectively shielding the cargo from environmental degradation and off-target toxicity. Upon systemic administration, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) is expected to efficiently penetrate tumors and crosse the BBB, both of which are mediated by ChTs. ch128.1Av/b-SO6 is selectively released in the TME upon MMP-2-mediated cleavage of the peptide crosslinkers, ensuring localized activation of the immunotoxin while minimizing off-target effects.

Fig. 1. Design and characterization of proimmunotoxin nanodrugs.

Fig. 1.

(A) Illustration of the design and mechanism of action of the proimmunotoxin nanodrug. The process begins with MPC monomers and MMP-2-sensitive peptide crosslinkers enriched around individual immunotoxin ch128.1Av/b-SO6 molecules (Step I). ch128.1Av/b-SO6 is encapsulated in a thin polymer shell via in situ polymerization to form n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) (Step II). Upon systemic administration, the choline analogue of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) facilitates BBB penetration via ChTs. In the TME, MMP-2-mediated cleavage of crosslinkers triggers the targeted release of the immunotoxin. (B) DLS analysis confirms the size differences between ch128.1Av/b-SO6 and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6). (C) TEM imaging shows the structural integrity and spherical morphology of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6).

The successful synthesis of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was confirmed through physicochemical characterization. The hydrodynamic radius of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS). Compared to ch128.1Av/b-SO6, which has an average diameter of approximately 9 nm, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) exhibited an increased diameter of 25 nm, indicating the formation of polymer shells around the immunotoxins (Fig. 1B). This observation was further validated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which confirmed the structural integrity and spherical morphology of the nanocapsules (Fig. 1C).

Nanocapsules showed markedly enhanced stability against proteolysis and storage-induced aggregation. Upon incubation with trypsin, a model protease, ch128.1Av/b-SO6 rapidly lost structural integrity and functional activity within 12 hrs, whereas n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) retained protein structure and robust activity even after 6 days of continuous exposure (Supplemental Fig. S3A,B). The nanocapsules also demonstrated excellent storage stability, with no detectable aggregation at 4 °C for up to 7 days (Supplemental Fig. S3C).

Subsequently, to assess whether the synthesis of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) preserved the cytotoxic efficacy of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 while enhancing tumor penetration, the antitumor efficacy of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was evaluated in vitro using 2F7-BR44 spheroids. Spheroids were treated with PBS (control), ch128.1Av/b-SO6, or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), and cell viability was assessed by tracking the loss of mCherry expression at 24- and 48-hrs post-treatment. Representative fluorescent images revealed a reduced radius of spheroids in both ch128.1Av/b-SO6- and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-treated groups compared to the PBS control, indicating that the encapsulation did not compromise the cytotoxic potential of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 (Fig. 2A). Notably, only n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) led to observable cell loss in the spheroid core, as indicated by penetrating holes (circled in white), suggesting enhanced deep-tissue penetration. To quantitatively compare tumor penetration, spheroid radii were measured across groups, confirming that both ch128.1Av/b-SO6 and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) exhibited comparable cytotoxicity in the outer layers where immunotoxin access was unrestricted (Fig. 2B). However, to directly assess penetration into deeper tumor regions, a Hoechst dye staining assay was employed [60]. Hoechst dye diffusion was used to determine cell positioning within spheroids, as the outer layers exhibited higher dye concentration, while the inner regions showed lower Hoechst intensity (Fig. 2C). Measurement of mCherry expression at the spheroid core further confirmed that n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) effectively induced cell death in the inner layers, demonstrating improved tumor penetration (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2. In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxic activity of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) in 2F7-BR44 spheroids and its BBB penetration in a transwell assay.

Fig. 2.

(A) Representative fluorescent images of 2F7-BR44 spheroids treated with PBS, ch128.1Av/b-SO6, or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) (4.6 μg/mL) for 24 and 48 hrs. White circles indicate penetration holes in the spheroids. (B) Spheroid size was quantified by measuring the spheroid radius, and comparisons were made across treatment groups (n = 5). Data are presented as means ± S.D., with significance calculated using the Student’s t-test. *** p< 0.001. (C) Hoechst 33342 staining assay was used to assess tumor penetration. 2F7-BR44 spheroids were stained with 0.1 μM 33342 dye, dissociated into single-cell suspensions, and analyzed via flow cytometry for Hoechst intensity and mCherry expression. Hoechst intensity below 104 was used to identify cell positioning within the spheroid core, while mCherry expression was used to monitor cell viability. (D) Tumor penetration efficacy of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was compared based on cell viability within the spheroid core. Data are presented as means ± S.D., with significance calculated using the Student’s t-test. ns: not significant. (E) Accumulative penetration efficiency of BSA and n(BSA) labeled with FITC through a monolayer of bEnd.3 cells in an in vitro BBB transwell assay (n = 3). The fluorescence intensity in the basolateral compartment was monitored. Data are analyzed with two-way ANOVA. ns: not significant, * p < 0.05, *** p< 0.001.

The ability of the nanocapsules to penetrate the BBB was evaluated using a widely adopted in vitro transwell model, in which a dense monolayer of mouse brain endothelial cells (bEnd.3) was cultured on the apical surface of the transwell insert. Monolayer integrity was verified by fluorescence microscopy and TEER measurements (Supplemental Fig. S4). To avoid endothelial damage from ch128.1Av/b-SO6, FITC-labeled bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a model protein to synthesize n(BSA). BSA or n(BSA) was added to the apical chamber, and penetration was quantified based on fluorescence intensity in the basolateral compartment. As shown in Fig. 2E, n(BSA) exhibited time-dependent translocation across the endothelial monolayer, reaching 20.2% penetration at 48 hrs, whereas native BSA showed minimal transport (1.5%).

Enhanced safety and decreased immunogenicity of proimmunotoxin nanodrugs

Non-target toxicity from immunotoxins and their delivery vehicles remains a major safety concern in immunotoxin therapies. To evaluate the biosafety of the polymer shells used in the proimmunotoxin nanodrugs and their ability to shield encapsulated immunotoxins before release, a non-degradable variant, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)BIS, was synthesized using BIS as a crosslinker. Compared to ch128.1Av/b-SO6, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)BIS induced negligible cell death, confirming both the biocompatibility of the polymer shells and their protective function (Supplemental Fig. S5). Moreover, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), when exposed to MMP-2 present in culture medium of 2F7-BR44 cells, exhibited delayed but ultimately comparable cytotoxicity to ch128.1Av/b-SO6. These findings demonstrate that polymer encapsulation effectively prevents toxicity before immunotoxin release, thereby enhancing the biosafety of the proimmunotoxin nanodrug in vivo.

To further evaluate the biosafety of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), BALB/c mice were administered a single i.v. injection via the tail vein of 4 mg/kg, a dose that previously resulted in non-specific toxicity. In the absence of tumor inoculation, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), designed to release the immunotoxin only within the tumor microenvironment, was expected to show negligible release in healthy mice. As shown in Fig. 3A, mice treated with the native ch128.1Av/b-SO6 immunotoxin displayed a reduction in body weight. In contrast, mice treated with n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) maintained stable body weight throughout the duration of the experiment (14 days), similar to the PBS group, consistent with the protective shielding conferred by encapsulation of the immunotoxin. Hepatic toxicity, a major concern for immunotoxin-based treatments [47, 61], was assessed by plasma ALT measurements. Mice treated with ch128.1Av/b-SO6 showed markedly elevated ALT levels relative to those receiving n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), indicating that encapsulation effectively mitigated hepatic toxicity (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3. Assessment of off-target toxicity and immunogenicity of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) in vivo.

Fig. 3.

BALB/c mice received a single i.v. dose of PBS, ch128.1Av/b-SO6 (4 mg/kg) or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) (4 mg/kg) via the tail vein (n = 6). (A) Body weight plots show the weight change in groups administered with PBS, ch128.1Av/b-SO6 or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6). Data are shown as means ± S.D., with significance determined using the two-way ANOVA. ns: not significant, * p < 0.05. (B) Plasma ALT levels were compared between treatment groups. Data are presented as means ± S.D., with significance calculated using the two-way ANOVA. ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (C) The ADA levels in plasma on Day 14. (D) Total IgG level in plasma on Day 14. Data are presented as means ± S.D., with significance calculated using the unpaired one-tailed Student’s t-test. ns, not significant, *** p < 0.001.

Finally, both anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels and total plasma IgG levels were assessed on Day 14 to evaluate the potential immunogenicity of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 (native or part of the nanodrug). Because the immunogenicity of immunotoxins is primarily driven by the toxin component, ADA responses against b-SO6 were quantified using a b-SO6-specific ELISA. As shown in Fig. 3C, mice treated with ch128.1Av/b-SO6 demonstrated markedly increased ADA levels, whereas n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) effectively prevented ADA response. Moreover, consistent with the expected immunogenicity of saporin as a plant protein, ch128.1Av/b-SO6 induced a strong immune response with significantly increased IgG levels, whereas n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) produced IgG levels comparable to PBS controls (Fig. 3D), suggesting that the polymer shell of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was biocompatible and prevented cargo-induced immunogenicity prior to release. This experiment was independently repeated using retro-orbital administration. Consistent safety outcomes confirmed that n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) mitigated the elevated ALT levels and acute ocular mucosal inflammation induced by ch128.1Av/b-SO6 (Supplemental Fig. S6).

Improved antitumor efficacy of proimmunotoxin nanodrugs in a lymphoma xenograft model

The tumor-killing efficiency of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was compared to the native immunotoxin in a xenograft AIDS-NHL model established by our group. Tumors were established in the CNS and BM within the first week, forming aggressive malignancies in the brain, spinal cord, femur, and kidneys at Week 2 [51, 52]. Based on the kinetics of lymphoma progression, treatment was administered at Weeks 1 and 3 with PBS, ch128.1Av/b-SO6, or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) (Fig. 4A). To minimize toxicity, a safe dose of 0.1 mg/kg of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 or an equivalent dose of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was administered i.v. via the tail vein. Tumor progression was monitored weekly using in vivo bioluminescent imaging to measure the increase in bioluminescent intensity (BLI) from 2F7-BR44 cells, with all animals euthanized on Day 35 for endpoint analysis.

Fig. 4. Evaluation of antitumor efficacy of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) in a xenograft AIDS-NHL mouse model.

Fig. 4.

(A) Treatment scheme in the xenograft AIDS-NHL mouse model. NSG mice were inoculated i.v. via the tail vein with 106 2F7-BR44 cells and then treated i.v. via the tail vein with PBS, ch128.1Av/b-SO6 (0.1 mg/kg), or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) (0.1 mg/kg, antibody-equivalent dose) via tail vein on Days 7 and 21 post-tumor xenograft and euthanized on Day 35 (n = 6). (B) Kaplan-Meier plot shows survival of all groups after cell inoculation. Statistical significance was calculated using log-rank test compared to the PBS control group. ** p < 0.01. (C) Longitudinal tumor progression was monitored weekly using bioluminescent imaging. Red X indicate deceased mice. (D) Tumor burden was quantified by flow cytometry as the percentage of 2F7-BR44 cells (mCherry+) among total cells isolated from bone marrow (BM), kidney, spleen, and brain. Data are presented as means ± S.D., with significance determined using the Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. ns: not significant, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

AIDS-NHL xenografted mice treated with n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) exhibited extended survival (Fig. 4B) and a significantly lower tumor burden (Fig. 4C) by more than one week compared to those treated with PBS or ch128.1Av/b-SO6. Although ch128.1Av/b-SO6 slightly prolonged survival in a subset of mice, its tumor burden reflected by bioluminescence in both regions remained comparable to PBS controls during Weeks 1–3, suggesting limited tumor suppression at the tested dose. In contrast, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) exhibited consistent therapeutic efficacy in both systemic and CNS tumors throughout the experiment. To further confirm tumor suppression across different metastatic sites, major organs were harvested, and mCherry-expressing tumor cells were quantified using flow cytometry (Fig. 4D). Consistent with BLI results, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) significantly suppressed tumor growth in major metastatic sites, with particularly strong effects in the kidneys and BM compared to PBS- and ch128.1Av/b-SO6-treated groups. The tumor growth rates per week were calculated based on the BLI data to evaluate the tumor suppression efficacy by treatment. Compared to ch128.1Av/b-SO6, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) demonstrated improved tumor suppression across all weeks. However, its suppression rate declined after the second dose, highlighting the need for further optimization of drug delivery to tumor sites. This experiment was independently repeated to confirm reproducibility (Supplemental Fig. S7).

Enhanced tumor targeting and antitumor efficacy of CXCL13-conjugated proimmunotoxin nanodrugs

Proimmunotoxin nanodrugs can be functionalized with ligands to enhance target specificity, directing them to lymphoma cells and thereby increasing the concentration of ch128.1Av/b-SO6 at tumor sites. This targeted approach is expected to enhance both potency and specificity while minimizing off-target effects. To achieve this, we successfully synthesized n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 by conjugating n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) with human CXCL13, a chemokine that interacts with CXCR5, a receptor expressed on mature B cells as well as B-cell NHL [51, 56]. The conjugation was performed using copper-free click chemistry at a molar ratio of 1:1. The specific elimination of 2F7-BR44 cells was compared among ch128.1Av/b-SO6, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 using a dual-chamber co-culture system comprising 2F7-BR44 (targeted cells) and Jurkat cells (non-targeted cells) cultured separately but interconnected by a diffusion chamber (Fig. 5A). Jurkat is a human T-cell leukemia cell line characterized by expression of TfR1 and absence of CXCR5 expression. The specificity of targeted cell death in 2F7-BR44 was determined by calculating the ratio of 2F7-BR44 cell death to Jurkat cell death. Given that both cell lines express high levels of human TfR1 and secrete MMP-2, ch128.1Av/b-SO6 and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) showed similar cytotoxic effects against both malignant cell lines, resulting in a specificity ratio of approximately 1. However, with CXCL13 conjugation, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 showed specific killing of 2F7-BR44 by Day 3, confirming enhanced specificity for CXCR5-expressing AIDS-NHL cells. Over subsequent days, specificity declined, likely due to the diffusion of released immunotoxin within the system.

Fig. 5. Assessment of tumor-targeting efficiency of the addition of CXCL13 to the proimmunotoxin.

Fig. 5.

(A) Targeted elimination of 2F7-BR44 cells by native ch128.1Av/b-SO6, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 (4.6 μg/mL) was assessed in a dual-chamber co-culture system, where 2F7-BR44 and Jurkat cells were cultured in separate wells but connected by a diffusion chamber. Samples were tested in triplicates. Data are presented as means ± S.D., with significance determined using the Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. ns: not significant, ** p < 0.01. (B) A microfluidic platform was used to simulate the mechanical environment of blood vessels to study the tumor-targeting efficacy of proimmunotoxins on 2F7-BR44 cell spheroids. The light microscopic image shows one tumor spheroid captured inside the microfluidic chip wells. (C) FITC-labeled BSA and n(BSA)-CXCL13 were introduced at a flow rate at 15 μL/min into the microfluidics cultured with targeted tumor 2F7-BR44 spheroids (mCherry+) or non-targeted Jurkat T spheroids (labeled with Hoechst-33342 dye), respectively to identify cells. Binding was analyzed using a fluorescent microscope. (D) Representative bioluminescence and fluorescence images show improved tumor targeting of n(BSA)-CXCL13 compared to BSA in the xenograft AIDS-NHL mouse model. NSG mice were inoculated i.v. via the tail vein with 106 2F7-BR44 cells (n = 3). 1 mg/kg BSA or n(BSA)-CXCL13 was administrated in the mice at Week 2 post-tumor xenograft. Bioluminescent imaging was used to monitor tumor location, while fluorescent imaging was employed for detection of BSA or n(BSA)-CXCL13 24 hrs post-injection.

It is of interest to assess the specific binding of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 to 2F7-BR44 cells. To avoid cytotoxicity, we used BSA and a microfluidic platform designed to simulate the mechanical environment of fluid dynamics within the TME (Fig. 5B, Supplemental Fig. S8A). By modeling laminar flow characteristic of the TME, especially in interstitial regions and abnormal vasculature, this system enables physiologically relevant evaluation of drug delivery [62, 63]. The microfluidic chip design allowed for precise flow rate control and the maintenance of a stable microenvironment for the spheroids (Supplemental Fig. S8B). 2F7-BR44 tumor spheroids were introduced into the microfluidic platform and settled into the wells. After 24 hrs of flow stabilization, BSA or n(BSA)-CXCL13 were introduced at a steady flow rate of 15 μL/min, mimicking bloodstream flow dynamics. COMSOL Multiphysics simulations confirmed that the platform successfully replicated targeted nanoparticle interactions under stable laminar flow, effectively mimicking blood vessel conditions (Supplemental Fig. S8C–E). To prevent spheroid disruption due to immunotoxin cytotoxicity and enable direct evaluation using imaging, FITC-labeled BSA and n(BSA)-CXCL13 were used to demonstrate the specific binding in the microfluidic platform with tumor spheroids of 2F7-BR44 (mCherry+) and Jurkat (Hoechst 33342), respectively (Fig. 5C). Facilitated by the interaction between CXCL13 and CXCR5, n(BSA)-CXCL13 exhibited strong binding to 2F7-BR44 spheroids but not to Jurkat spheroids at 24 hrs post-injection. The tumor-targeting ability of n(BSA)-CXCL13 was evaluated in xenograft AIDS-NHL mice at two weeks post-tumor xenograft (Fig. 5D). At 24 hrs post-injection, bioluminescent imaging was used to monitor tumor location, while fluorescent imaging of BSA or n(BSA)-CXCL13 labeled with Cy5.5 was performed using an excitation filter (660–690 nm) to minimize potential signal overlap from mCherry in 2F7-BR44 cells. The fluorescent signal from BSA was undetectable, whereas n(BSA)-CXCL13 exhibited strong retention in the tumor region, highlighting its superior tumor-targeting capability.

Leveraging the superior tumor-targeting capability of the CXCL13 conjugated proimmunotoxin, a dose of 1 mg/kg, 10-fold higher than the safe dose of ch128.1Av/b-SO6, was evaluated for therapeutic efficacy in xenograft AIDS-NHL mice. Xenografted mice were treated with PBS, ch128.1Av/b-SO6, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 via i.v. injection on Days 7 and 21 post-tumor xenograft. Longitudinal antitumor effects were monitored weekly using in vivo bioluminescent imaging, with all animals euthanized on Day 35 for tissue analysis (Fig. 6A). Treatment with n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 resulted in significantly greater control of lymphoma burden compared to other groups, as measured by BLIs in a defined region of interest (ROI) (Fig. 6B). Total body or head-region BLIs were quantitively compared among the four groups (Fig. 6C). Both n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 significantly reduced BLIs at multiple time points compared to PBS and ch128.1Av/b-SO6. Notably, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 exhibited the lowest tumor burden in both systemic and CNS at the end point of the experiment. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis further highlighted the therapeutic benefits of CXCL13 ligand conjugation. Mice treated with n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 exhibited 100% survival throughout the experiment up to Day 35, indicating superior survival benefits (Fig. 6D). Tumor burden in major metastatic organs, including the brain, BM, and kidneys, was further quantified by assessing the percentages of mCherry+ 2F7-BR44 cells within total tissue cells using flow cytometry (Fig. 6E). Different from the insufficient efficacy of ch128.1Av/b-SO6, both n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 significantly reduced tumor burden. The reduction was particularly pronounced in the n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13-treated group, attributable to its enhanced tumor-targeting capability. Moreover, whereas ch128.1Av/b-SO6 treatment was associated with increased liver enzyme levels, both n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 showed liver enzyme levels comparable to PBS controls, suggesting minimal liver toxicity with the pro-immunotoxin formulations (Fig. 6F). The therapeutic efficacy of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) or n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 was evaluated again in another independent test in the xenograft murine model with 2F7-BR44 cells. Consistently, the administration of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 achieved a significant extension in mouse survival compared to the other treatments including n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) as shown in Supplemental Fig. S9. These findings underscore the potential of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 as a therapeutic agent for disseminated AIDS-NHL.

Fig. 6. Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of a CXCL13-targeted proimmunotoxin the xenograft AIDS-NHL mouse model.

Fig. 6.

(A) Treatment scheme in the xenograft AIDS-NHL mouse model. NSG mice engrafted with 106 2F7-BR44 cells i.v. via tail vein injection were treated i.v. via the tail vein with PBS, or with 1 mg/kg of ch128.1Av/b-SO6, n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6), n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13 on Days 7 and 21 post-tumor xenograft (n = 6). Dosages were normalized to ch128.1Av antibody fusion protein content. (B) Longitudinal tumor progression was monitored weekly using bioluminescent imaging. Boxes with a red X indicate deceased mice. (C) Tumor burden was quantified based on bioluminescence signals detected through imaging. No statistical analysis was performed at Wk 4 due to unequal animal numbers across groups. (D) Kaplan-Meier plot shows survival of all treatment groups after cell inoculation. Statistical significance was calculated using log-rank test compared to the PBS control group. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. (E) Tumor burden in major metastatic sites (brain, BM, and kidneys) was quantified by flow cytometry as the percentage of mCherry+ 2F7-BR44 cells within the total tissue cell population. (F) Liver toxicity was assessed by measuring the plasma levels of ALT, AST, and ALP using ELISA assays. Data in panels C, E, F are presented as means ± S.D., with significance calculated with Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. ns: not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Discussion

AIDS-NHL in people living with HIV tends to manifest earlier in life and with more aggressive, advanced-stage disease, frequently involving extranodal sites such as the CNS [2–7]. An important challenge in designing effective therapies for NHL lies in achieving effective delivery to the CNS and targeting of malignant cells while minimizing off-target toxicity. Elevated human TfR1 is associated with tumorigenesis, cancer progression, and poor prognosis [12, 14, 15, 64], including solid cancers such as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [65, 66], breast cancer [67, 68], ovarian cancer [69], lung cancer [70], cervical cancer [71], bladder cancer [72], osteosarcoma [73], pancreatic cancer [74–76], cholangiocarcinoma [77], renal cell carcinoma [78], hepatocellular carcinoma [79–81], adrenal cortical carcinoma [82], and malignancies of the CNS such as glioblastomas [83, 84] as well as hematopoietic malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [85, 86], chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [16], and NHL [16–18]. Notably, AIDS-NHL expresses even higher TfR1 mRNA levels compared to NHL cells from non-infected individuals [19, 20]. However, it is well known that not all tumor types respond equally to anti-TfR1 antibodies and that even in those that respond there is the possibility that resistance may develop [15]. Thus, it is of interest to explore the use of antibodies, and their derivatives bound to antitumor agents to be delivered into cancer cells by RME [13, 37]. Immunotoxins containing anti-TfR1 antibodies function independently of the immune system by directly delivering toxins into malignant cells, ensuring effectiveness even in the presence of a dysfunctional immune system. Moreover, immunotoxins bypass tumor resistance to antibody-mediated mechanisms by directly causing cancer cell death through the action of the toxin. Therefore, immunotoxins offer a promising antitumor therapy for cancer, including AIDS-NHL.

Despite the above-mentioned advantages, the clinical application of immunotoxins is limited by issues of off-target toxicity and immunogenicity. Moreover, for ch128.1Av/b-SO6, rapid clearance driven by the presence of avidin shortens its circulating half-life and limits its antitumor efficacy. In this study, we developed a proimmunotoxin nanodrug platform using ch128.1Av/b-SO6, an immunotoxin targeting TfR1 for the treatment of AIDS-NHL, including primary and metastatic brain disease. Our strategy mitigated safety and efficacy concerns by encapsulating ch128.1Av/b-SO6 within a zwitterionic polymeric nanocapsule, synthesized using MPC and an MMP-2-responsive crosslinker. Compared to native ch128.1Av/b-SO6, proimmunotoxin nanodrugs, both n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) and n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13, improve the antitumor efficacy. MPC-based zwitterionic nanocapsules offer multiple advantages, including protection from potential immunogenicity and prolonged half-life of encapsulated therapeutics [51–53, 87]. The zwitterionic MPC polymers form a strong hydration layer due to their positively and negatively charged functional groups, creating steric hindrance that prevents protein adsorption and immune cell recognition [87, 88]. Furthermore, the zwitterionic shell reduces cellular uptake by immune cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells, thereby limiting antigen presentation and adaptive immune responses [51–53]. Moreover, the choline analogue structure on MPC-based nanocapsules facilitate transcytosis of the BBB and tumor infiltration through binding to ChTs on the endothelial cells of the BBB [51–53] and cancer cells [89]. The enzyme-responsive peptide crosslinkers ensure targeted therapeutic release, activating in the tumor microenvironment [55, 90]. The enhanced tumor penetration of nanocapsules is driven by a combination of zwitterionic surface properties, optimal nanoscale size, choline analogue modification, and controlled release behavior. The zwitterionic PMPC shell forms a dense hydration layer that minimizes nonspecific interactions with extracellular matrix (ECM) components, enabling low-fouling, stealth-like diffusion through the tumor interstitium. This effect is further supported by the nanocapsule’s small hydrodynamic size (~25 nm), which facilitates interstitial transport through tight ECM pores. Simultaneously, the choline analogue of PMPC promotes active uptake via ChTs, which are upregulated in tumor cells to meet increased demands for phospholipid biosynthesis, particularly in the hypoxic inner layers of spheroids where expression of ChTs is elevated [55, 58, 59]. Some nanocapsules remain structurally intact during interstitial transport and cellular uptake due to their MMP-2-sensitive controlled release design. Following ChT-mediated internalization, these nanocapsules may undergo exocytosis and be subsequently uptaken by adjacent cells, facilitating a transcytosis-like mechanism that supports the tumor penetration and the BBB crossing. Together, the combination of passive stealth diffusion and active transcellular transport enables efficient traversal of multilayered tumor spheroids. In contrast, penetration across the BBB relies more heavily on transcellular movement due to the minimal interstitial space between tightly packed endothelial cells. The encapsulated ch128.1Av/b-SO6 is further optimized by conjugating tumor-targeting ligands, redirecting them to specific cells. Together, these features significantly improve the potency and specificity of the proimmunotoxin nanodrug. The biosafety profile of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) was significantly improved compared to the native immunotoxin. Encapsulation effectively mitigated the systemic toxicity of ch128.1Av/b-SO6, as evidenced by the absence of liver toxicity in treated mice. These findings suggest that the proimmunotoxin strategy could potentially overcome the limitations of traditional immunotoxin therapies, providing a safer and more effective treatment option for NHL, particularly in patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors.

An important limitation of present in vivo studies is that the full extent of potential toxicity of the proimmunotoxin nanodrug cannot be adequately addressed given the lack of cross-reactivity of the antibody with mouse TfR1 [30]. Therefore, additional studies in relevant animal models are required to properly evaluate potential toxicities of the present strategy. However, the results of this study suggest that n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6)-CXCL13, along with other constructs based on this proimmunotoxin nanodrug strategy, warrant further investigation as potential therapeutics for AIDS-NHL and potentially other malignancies.

There are several key areas for further exploration. First, it is essential to optimize the formulation of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) for clinical application, particularly in scaling up production and ensuring stability since nanocapsule production has only been achieved in small volume so far and potential problems such as gelling could occur during preparation in large quantity in free radical polymerization [91]. Additionally, the versatility of this nanocapsule platform suggests potential applications beyond NHL, particularly in treating other cancers with brain metastases. The microfluidic platform developed in this study offers a valuable tool for screening and optimizing these nanodrug formulations in a controlled environment that mimics in vivo conditions. Future studies should also explore the integration of n(ch128.1Av/b-SO6) with other treatment modalities to enhance therapeutic outcomes.

In conclusion, the development of proimmunotoxin nanodrugs using a nanoencapsulation strategy represents a significant advancement in targeted cancer therapy. This platform not only offers a promising treatment option for AIDS-NHL but also opens new avenues for treating NHL in the general population as well as other malignancies with and without CNS involvement. Continued research and development will be crucial in translating this innovative therapy from preclinical to clinical transition, with the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments:

The authors thank the technical support from the UCLA CFAR Virology Core (P30AI28697) and NIH Cancer Center Support Grant (2 P30CA016042). The authors thank the support from UCLA AIDS Institute, the James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust, and the McCarthy Family Foundation. The synthesis scheme and study design are prepared with BioRender.com. This work was supported in part by the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center seed grant and National Institutes of Health grant R01CA196266 (MLP) and R01CA253215 (JW).

Competing interests:

The authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Y.L. and J.W. have a financial interest in Vivibaba, Inc. and the regents have licensed intellectual property invented by Y.L. and J.W. to Vivibaba, Inc.. M. L.P. has a financial interest in Stellar Biosciences, Inc. The Regents of the University of California have licensed technologies invented by M.L. P. to this firm. In addition, he has a financial interest in Klyss Biotech, Inc. No funding was provided by these companies to support this work. The other authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Data and materials availability:

All data required to evaluate the conclusion in this paper are present in the main text or the Supplementary Materials. Raw data may be requested from the authors if needed.

References

  • [1].Thandra KC, Barsouk A, Saginala K, Padala SA, Barsouk A, Rawla P, Epidemiology of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, Med Sci (Basel), 9 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A, Cancer statistics, 2025, CA Cancer J Clin, 75 (2025) 10–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Silverberg MJ, Leyden W, Hernandez-Ramirez RU, Qin L, Lin H, Justice AC, Hessol NA, Achenbach CJ, D’Souza G, Engels EA, Althoff KN, Mayor AM, Sterling TR, Kitahata MM, Bosch RJ, Saag MS, Rabkin CS, Horberg MA, Gill MJ, Grover S, Mathews WC, Li J, Crane HM, Gange SJ, Lau B, Moore RD, Dubrow R, Neugebauer RS, Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation and Risk of Cancer Among Persons Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Clin Infect Dis, 72 (2021) 1900–1909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Re A, Cattaneo C, Rossi G, Hiv and Lymphoma: from Epidemiology to Clinical Management, Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis, 11 (2019) e2019004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Revision of the case definition of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome for national reporting--United States, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 34 (1985) 373–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Chen Y, Sun ZC, Sun P, Liu YP, Wan ZW, Ye YL, Global and regional burden estimation of HIV-associated non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a meta-analysis and modelling analysis protocol, Bmj Open, 14 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Hernández-Ramírez RU, Qin L, Lin HQ, Leyden W, Neugebauer RS, Althoff KN, Achenbach CJ, Hessol NA, D’Souza G, Gebo KA, Gill MJ, Grover S, Horberg MA, Li J, Mathews WC, Mayor AM, Park LS, Rabkin CS, Salters K, Justice AC, Moore RD, Engels EA, Silverberg M, Dubrow R, Databases IE, Association of immunosuppression and HIV viraemia with non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk overall and by subtype in people living with HIV in Canada and the USA: a multicentre cohort study, The Lancet Hi, 6 (2019) E240–E249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Lilly AJ, Fedoriw Y, Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Lymphoproliferative Disorders, Surg Pathol Clin, 12 (2019) 771–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Barta SK, Joshi J, Mounier N, Xue X, Wang D, Ribera JM, Navarro JT, Hoffmann C, Dunleavy K, Little RF, Wilson WH, Spina M, Galicier L, Noy A, Sparano JA, Central nervous system involvement in AIDS-related lymphomas, Br J Haematol, 173 (2016) 857–866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Chiao EY, Coghill A, Kizub D, Fink V, Ndlovu N, Mazul A, Sigel K, The effect of non-AIDS-defining cancers on people living with HIV, Lancet Oncol, 22 (2021) e240–e253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Epeldegui M, Vendrame E, Martinez-Maza O, HIV-associated immune dysfunction and viral infection: role in the pathogenesis of AIDS-related lymphoma, Immunol Res, 48 (2010) 72–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Daniels TR, Delgado T, Rodriguez JA, Helguera G, Penichet ML, The transferrin receptor part I: Biology and targeting with cytotoxic antibodies for the treatment of cancer, Clin Immunol, 121 (2006) 144–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Daniels-Wells TR, Penichet ML, Transferrin receptor 1: a target for antibody-mediated cancer therapy, Immunotherapy, 8 (2016) 991–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Shen Y, Li X, Dong D, Zhang B, Xue Y, Shang P, Transferrin receptor 1 in cancer: a new sight for cancer therapy, Am J Cancer Res, 8 (2018) 916–931. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Candelaria PV, Leoh LS, Penichet ML, Daniels-Wells TR, Antibodies Targeting the Transferrin Receptor 1 (TfR1) as Direct Anti-cancer Agents, Front Immunol, 12 (2021) 607692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Das Gupta A, Shah VI, Correlation of transferrin receptor expression with histologic grade and immunophenotype in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Hematol Pathol, 4 (1990) 37–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Habeshaw JA, Lister TA, Stansfeld AG, Greaves MF, Correlation of transferrin receptor expression with histological class and outcome in non-hodgkin lymphoma, The Lancet, 321 (1983) 498–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Wu JM, Borowitz MJ, Weir EG, The usefulness of CD71 expression by flow cytometry for differentiating indolent from aggressive CD10+ B-cell lymphomas, Am J Clin Pathol, 126 (2006) 39–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Maguire A, Chen XF, Wisner L, Ramsower C, Glinsmann-Gibson B, Rimsza LM, Over-Expression of Transferrin Receptor (TFRC/CD71) and Low Expression of Innate and Adaptive Immune Cell Subsets in HIV-Associated, GCB-DLBCL By Digital Gene Expression Profiling. The American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting (November 13, 2019; Orlando, Florida, USA: ), Blood, 134 Supplement_1 (2019) 2783 [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Maguire A, Chen X, Wisner L, Malasi S, Ramsower C, Kendrick S, Barrett MT, Glinsmann-Gibson B, McGrath M, L. R, Potential Alternative Survival Mechanisms in HIV-Associated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) of Germinal Center (GCB) Origin. International Confereence on Malignancies in HIV/AIDS (October 21–22, 2019; Bethesda, Maryland, USA: ). Abstract No. O10. [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Essaghir A, Demoulin JB, A minimal connected network of transcription factors regulated in human tumors and its application to the quest for universal cancer biomarkers, PLoS One, 7 (2012) e39666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Ng PP, Dela Cruz JS, Sorour DN, Stinebaugh JM, Shin SU, Shin DS, Morrison SL, Penichet ML, An anti-transferrin receptor-avidin fusion protein exhibits both strong proapoptotic activity and the ability to deliver various molecules into cancer cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99 (2002) 10706–10711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Ng PP, Helguera G, Daniels TR, Lomas SZ, Rodriguez JA, Schiller G, Bonavida B, Morrison SL, Penichet ML, Molecular events contributing to cell death in malignant human hematopoietic cells elicited by an IgG3-avidin fusion protein targeting the transferrin receptor, Blood, 108 (2006) 2745–2754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Green NM, Avidin and streptavidin, Methods Enzymol, 184 (1990) 51–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Daniels-Wells TR, Ng PP, Delgado T, Lynch MR, Schiller G, Helguera G, Penichet ML, Conjugation of an anti-transferrin receptor IgG3-avidin fusion protein with biotinylated saporin results in significant enhancement of its cytotoxicity against malignant hematopoietic cells, Mol Cancer Ther, 6 (2007) 2995–3008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Penichet ML, Morrison SL, Design and engineering of human forms of monoclonal antibodies, Drug Dev Res, 61 (2004) 121–136. [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Payes CJ, Daniels-Wells TR, Maffia P, Penichet ML, Morrison SL, Helguera G, Genetic Engineering of Antibody Molecules. In Reviews in Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine. Meyers Robert A., ed. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., Weinheim, Germany. New edition. 2015, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 1–52. [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Rodriguez JA, Helguera G, Daniels TR, Neacato II, Lopez-Valdes HE, Charles AC, Penichet ML, Binding specificity and internalization properties of an antibody-avidin fusion protein targeting the human transferrin receptor, J Control Release, 124 (2007) 35–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Hickerson BT, Daniels-Wells TR, Payes C, Clark LE, Candelaria PV, Bailey KW, Sefing EJ, Zink S, Ziegenbein J, Abraham J, Helguera G, Penichet ML, Gowen BB, Host receptor-targeted therapeutic approach to counter pathogenic New World mammarenavirus infections, Nat Commun, 13 (2022) 558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Helguera G, Jemielity S, Abraham J, Cordo SM, Martinez MG, Rodriguez JA, Bregni C, Wang JJ, Farzan M, Penichet ML, Candurra NA, Choe H, An antibody recognizing the apical domain of human transferrin receptor 1 efficiently inhibits the entry of all New World hemorrhagic fever arenaviruses, Journal of virology, 86 (2012) 4024–4028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Rodriguez JA, Luria-Perez R, Lopez-Valdes HE, Casero D, Daniels TR, Patel S, Avila D, Leuchter R, So S, Ortiz-Sanchez E, Bonavida B, Martinez-Maza O, Charles AC, Pellegrini M, Helguera G, Penichet ML, Lethal iron deprivation induced by non-neutralizing antibodies targeting transferrin receptor 1 in malignant B cells, Leuk Lymphoma, 52 (2011) 2169–2178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Daniels TR, Ortiz-Sanchez E, Luria-Perez R, Quintero R, Helguera G, Bonavida B, Martinez-Maza O, Penichet ML, An antibody-based multifaceted approach targeting the human transferrin receptor for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, J Immunother, 34 (2011) 500–508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Rosebrough SF, Hartley DF, Biochemical modification of streptavidin and avidin: in vitro and in vivo analysis, J Nucl Med, 37 (1996) 1380–1384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Daniels-Wells TR, Candelaria PV, Leoh LS, Nava M, Martinez-Maza O, Penichet ML, An IgG1 Version of the Anti-transferrin Receptor 1 Antibody ch128.1 Shows Significant Antitumor Activity Against Different Xenograft Models of Multiple Myeloma: A Brief Communication, J Immunother, 43 (2020) 48–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Leoh LS, Kim YK, Candelaria PV, Martinez-Maza O, Daniels-Wells TR, Penichet ML, Efficacy and Mechanism of Antitumor Activity of an Antibody Targeting Transferrin Receptor 1 in Mouse Models of Human Multiple Myeloma, J Immunol, 200 (2018) 3485–3494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Daniels-Wells TR, Candelaria PV, Kranz E, Wen J, Wang L, Kamata M, Almagro JC, Martinez-Maza O, Penichet ML, Efficacy of Antibodies Targeting TfR1 in Xenograft Mouse Models of AIDS-Related Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Cancers (Basel), 15 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Daniels TR, Bernabeu E, Rodriguez JA, Patel S, Kozman M, Chiappetta DA, Holler E, Ljubimova JY, Helguera G, Penichet ML, The transferrin receptor and the targeted delivery of therapeutic agents against cancer, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1820 (2012) 291–317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Barthelemy I, Martineau D, Ong M, Matsunami R, Ling N, Benatti L, Cavallaro U, Soria M, Lappi DA, The expression of saporin, a ribosome-inactivating protein from the plant Saponaria officinalis, in Escherichia coli, J Biol Chem, 268 (1993) 6541–6548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Stirpe F, Gasperi-Campani A, Barbieri L, Falasca A, Abbondanza A, Stevens WA, Ribosome-inactivating proteins from the seeds of Saponaria officinalis (soapwort), of Agrostemma githago (corn cockle) and of Asparagus officinalis (asparagus), and from the latex of Hura crepitans (sandbox tree), Biochem J, 216 (1983) 617–625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Ancheta LR, Shramm PA, Bouajram R, Higgins D, Lappi DA, Saporin as a Commercial Reagent: Its Uses and Unexpected Impacts in the Biological Sciences-Tools from the Plant Kingdom, Toxins (Basel), 14 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Giansanti F, Flavell DJ, Angelucci F, Fabbrini MS, Ippoliti R, Strategies to Improve the Clinical Utility of Saporin-Based Targeted Toxins, Toxins (Basel), 10 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Polito L, Bortolotti M, Mercatelli D, Battelli MG, Bolognesi A, Saporin-S6: a useful tool in cancer therapy, Toxins (Basel), 5 (2013) 1698–1722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Daniels-Wells TR, Helguera G, Rodriguez JA, Leoh LS, Erb MA, Diamante G, Casero D, Pellegrini M, Martinez-Maza O, Penichet ML, Insights into the mechanism of cell death induced by saporin delivered into cancer cells by an antibody fusion protein targeting the transferrin receptor 1, Toxicol In Vitro, 27 (2013) 220–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Stirpe F, Derenzini M, Barbieri L, Farabegoli F, Brown AN, Knowles PP, Thorpe PE, Hepatotoxicity of immunotoxins made with saporin, a ribosome-inactivating protein from Saponaria officinalis, Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol, 53 (1987) 259–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Marttila AT, Laitinen OH, Airenne KJ, Kulik T, Bayer EA, Wilchek M, Kulomaa MS, Recombinant NeutraLite avidin: a non-glycosylated, acidic mutant of chicken avidin that exhibits high affinity for biotin and low non-specific binding properties, FEBS Lett, 467 (2000) 31–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Nguyen TT, Sly KL, Conboy JC, Comparison of the energetics of avidin, streptavidin, neutrAvidin, and anti-biotin antibody binding to biotinylated lipid bilayer examined by second-harmonic generation, Anal Chem, 84 (2012) 201–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Mazor R, Onda M, Pastan I, Immunogenicity of therapeutic recombinant immunotoxins, Immunol Rev, 270 (2016) 152–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Zheng Z, Okada R, Kobayashi H, Nagaya T, Wei J, Zhou Q, Lee F, Bera TK, Gao Y, Kuhlman W, Tai CH, Pastan I, Site-Specific PEGylation of Anti-Mesothelin Recombinant Immunotoxins Increases Half-life and Antitumor Activity, Mol Cancer Ther, 19 (2020) 812–821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].M. S Li M, Yang Y, Shen Y, Chen L, Strategies to mitigate the on- and off-target toxicities of recombinant immunotoxins: an antibody engineering perspective, Antib Ther, Jun 16;5(3):164–176 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Chen H, Gao J, Lu Y, Kou G, Zhang H, Fan L, Sun Z, Guo Y, Zhong Y, Preparation and characterization of PE38KDEL-loaded anti-HER2 nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy, J Control Release, 128 (2008) 209–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Wen J, Wang L, Ren J, Kranz E, Chen SL, Wu D, Kanazawa T, Chen I, Lu YF, Kamata M, Nanoencapsulated rituximab mediates superior cellular immunity against metastatic B-cell lymphoma in a complement competent humanized mouse model, J Immunother Cancer, 9 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Wen J, Wu D, Qin M, Liu C, Wang L, Xu D, Vinters HV, Liu Y, Kranz E, Guan X, Sun G, Sun X, Lee Y, Martinez-Maza O, Widney D, Lu Y, Chen ISY, Kamata M, Sustained delivery and molecular targeting of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody to metastases in the central nervous system of mice, Nat Biomed Eng, 3 (2019) 706–716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Wu D, Qin M, Xu D, Wang L, Liu CY, Ren J, Zhou G, Chen C, Yang FM, Li YY, Zhao Y, Huang RY, Pourtaheri S, Kang CS, Kamata M, Chen ISY, He ZL, Wen J, Chen W, Lu YF, A Bioinspired Platform for Effective Delivery of Protein Therapeutics to the Central Nervous System, Adv Mater, 31 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Qin M, Wang L, Wu D, Williams CK, Xu D, Kranz E, Guo Q, Guan JQ, Vinters HV, Lee Y, Xie YM, Luo Y, Sun GB, Sun XB, He ZL, Lu YF, Kamata M, Wen J, Chen ISY, Enhanced Delivery of Rituximab Into Brain and Lymph Nodes Using Timed-Release Nanocapsules in Non-Human Primates, Front.Immunol, 10 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Han L, Liu CY, Qi HZ, Zhou JH, Wen J, Wu D, Xu D, Qin M, Ren J, Wang QX, Long LX, Liu Y, Chen I, Yuan XB, Lu YF, Kang CS, Systemic Delivery of Monoclonal Antibodies to the Central Nervous System for Brain Tumor Therapy, Adv Mater, 31 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Widney DP, Olafsen T, Wu AM, Kitchen CM, Said JW, Smith JB, Pena G, Magpantay LI, Penichet ML, Martinez-Maza O, Levels of murine, but not human, CXCL13 are greatly elevated in NOD-SCID mice bearing the AIDS-associated Burkitt lymphoma cell line, 2F7, PLoS One, 8 (2013) e72414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis, Nat Methods, 9 (2012) 671–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Inazu M, Functional Expression of Choline Transporters in the Blood-Brain Barrier, Nutrients, 11 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Hara T, Bansal A, DeGrado TR, Choline transporter as a novel target for molecular imaging of cancer, Mol Imaging, 5 (2006) 498–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Olive PL, Chaplin DJ, Durand RE, Pharmacokinetics, Binding and Distribution of Hoechst 33342 in Spheroids and Murine Tumors, Brit J Cancer, 52 (1985) 739–746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Virchows Archiv. A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology, in, Springer International, Berlin; New York, 1982, pp. 25 volumes. [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Regmi S, Poudel C, Adhikari R, Luo KQ, Applications of Microfluidics and Organ-on-a-Chip in Cancer Res, Biosensors (Basel), 12 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Wlodkowic D, Cooper JM, Tumors on chips: oncology meets microfluidics, Curr Opin Chem Biol, 14 (2010) 556–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Kawabata H, Transferrin and transferrin receptors update, Free Radic Biol Med, 133 (2019) 46–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Chan KT, Choi MY, Lai KKY, Tan W, Tung LN, Lam HY, Tong DK, Lee NP, Law S, Overexpression of transferrin receptor CD71 and its tumorigenic properties in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Oncol Rep, 31 (2014) 1296–1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Ikenaga N, Takahashi T, Tanaka K, Serada S, Fujimoto M, Momose K, Yamashita K, Makino T, Saito T, Yamamoto K, Kurokawa Y, Nakajima K, Fujii T, Morii E, Naka T, Eguchi H, Doki Y, Overexpression of Transferrin Receptor in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Suggests Poor Prognosis and Potential Therapy, Cancer Sci, (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Habashy HO, Powe DG, Staka CM, Rakha EA, Ball G, Green AR, Aleskandarany M, Paish EC, Douglas MacMillan R, Nicholson RI, Ellis IO, Gee JMW, Transferrin receptor (CD71) is a marker of poor prognosis in breast cancer and can predict response to tamoxifen, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 119 (2010) 283–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Ding Cheng Y, Wang F, Elliott RL, Head JF, Expression of transferrin receptor and ferritin H-chain mRNA are associated with clinical and histopathological prognostic indicators in breast cancer, Anticancer Res, 21 (2001) 541–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Basuli D, Tesfay L, Deng Z, Paul B, Yamamoto Y, Ning G, Xian W, McKeon F, Lynch M, Crum CP, Hegde P, Brewer M, Wang X, Miller LD, Dyment N, Torti FM, Torti SV, Iron addiction: a novel therapeutic target in ovarian cancer, Oncogene, 36 (2017) 4089–4099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Kondo K, Noguchi M, Mukai K, Matsuno Y, Sato Y, Shimosato Y, Monden Y, Transferrin receptor expression in adenocarcinoma of the lung as a histopathologic indicator of prognosis, Chest, 97 (1990) 1367–1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Xu X, Liu T, Wu J, Wang Y, Hong Y, Zhou H, Transferrin receptor-involved HIF-1 signaling pathway in cervical cancer, Cancer Gene Ther, 26 (2019) 356–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Smith NW, Strutton GM, Walsh MD, Wright GR, Seymour GJ, Lavin MF, Gardiner RA, Transferrin receptor expression in primary superficial human bladder tumours identifies patients who develop recurrences, Br J Urol, 65 (1990) 339–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Wu H, Zhang J, Dai R, Xu J, Feng H, Transferrin receptor-1 and VEGF are prognostic factors for osteosarcoma, J Orthop Surg Res, 14 (2019) 296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Ryschich E, Huszty G, Knaebel HP, Hartel M, Buchler MW, Schmidt J, Transferrin receptor is a marker of malignant phenotype in human pancreatic cancer and in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas, Eur J Cancer, 40 (2004) 1418–1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Jeong SM, Hwang S, Seong RH, Transferrin receptor regulates pancreatic cancer growth by modulating mitochondrial respiration and ROS generation, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 471 (2016) 373–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Zhongqing L, Uddin S, Wence Z, Elevated expression of transferrin receptor-1 in pancreatic cancer: clinical implications and prognostic significance, Clin Exp Med, 25 (2025) 307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Jamnongkan W, Thanan R, Techasen A, Namwat N, Loilome W, Intarawichian P, Titapun A, Yongvanit P, Upregulation of transferrin receptor-1 induces cholangiocarcinoma progression via induction of labile iron pool, Tumour Biol, 39 (2017) 1010428317717655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Greene CJ, Attwood K, Sharma NJ, Gross KW, Smith GJ, Xu B, Kauffman EC, Transferrin receptor 1 upregulation in primary tumor and downregulation in benign kidney is associated with progression and mortality in renal cell carcinoma patients, Oncotarget, 8 (2017) 107052–107075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Adachi M, Kai K, Yamaji K, Ide T, Noshiro H, Kawaguchi A, Aishima S, Transferrin receptor 1 overexpression is associated with tumour de-differentiation and acts as a potential prognostic indicator of hepatocellular carcinoma, Histopathology, 75 (2019) 63–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Shen Y, Li X, Zhao B, Xue Y, Wang S, Chen X, Yang J, Lv H, Shang P, Iron metabolism gene expression and prognostic features of hepatocellular carcinoma, J Cell Biochem, 119 (2018) 9178–9204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Xiao C, Fu X, Wang Y, Liu H, Jiang Y, Zhao Z, You F, Transferrin receptor regulates malignancies and the stemness of hepatocellular carcinoma-derived cancer stem-like cells by affecting iron accumulation, PLoS One, 15 (2020) e0243812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Moon SJ, Kim JH, Kong SH, Shin CS, Protein Expression of Cyclin B1, Transferrin Receptor, and Fibronectin Is Correlated with the Prognosis of Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma, Endocrinol Metab (Seoul), 35 (2020) 132–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Prior R, Reifenberger G, Wechsler W, Transferrin receptor expression in tumours of the human nervous system: relation to tumour type, grading and tumour growth fraction, Virchows Archiv. A, Pathological anatomy and histopathology, 416 (1990) 491–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Rosager AM, Sorensen MD, Dahlrot RH, Hansen S, Schonberg DL, Rich JN, Lathia JD, Kristensen BW, Transferrin receptor-1 and ferritin heavy and light chains in astrocytic brain tumors: Expression and prognostic value, PLoS One, 12 (2017) e0182954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Das Gupta A, Patil J, Shah VI, Transferrin receptor expression by blast cells in acute lymphoblastic leukemia correlates with white cell count & immunophenotype, Indian J Med Res, 104 (1996) 226–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Hagag AA, Badraia IM, Abdelmageed MM, Hablas NM, Hazzaa SME, Nosair NA, Prognostic Value of Transferrin Receptor-1 (CD71) Expression in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets, 18 (2018) 610–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Liang S, Liu Y, Jin X, Liu G, Wen J, Zhang LL, Li J, Yuan XB, Chen ISY, Chen W, Wang H, Shi LQ, Zhu XY, Lu YF, Phosphorylcholine polymer nanocapsules prolong the circulation time and reduce the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins, Nano Res, 9 (2016) 1022–1031. [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Li Q, Wen C, Yang J, Zhou X, Zhu Y, Zheng J, Cheng G, Bai J, Xu T, Ji J, Jiang S, Zhang L, Zhang P, Zwitterionic Biomaterials, Chem Rev, 122 (2022) 17073–17154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Yao N, Li W, Xu G, Duan N, Yu G, Qu J, Choline metabolism and its implications in cancer, Front Oncol, 13 (2023) 1234887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Wen J, Anderson SM, Du J, Yan M, Wang J, Shen M, Lu Y, Segura T, Controlled protein delivery based on enzyme-responsive nanocapsules, Adv Mater, 23 (2011) 4549–4553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Kiritoshi Y, Ishihara K, Preparation of cross-linked biocompatible poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) gel and its strange swelling behavior in water/ethanol mixture, J Biomat Sci-Polym E, 13 (2002) 213–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Data Availability Statement

All data required to evaluate the conclusion in this paper are present in the main text or the Supplementary Materials. Raw data may be requested from the authors if needed.

RESOURCES