Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Apr 23;16:17384. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-48534-y

Fixed-point topology meets fractal memory: a Kutumba-stabilized framework for nonlocal fractal–fractional dynamics

R Aruna Devi 1, R Surendar 1, S Sweatha 2, Syed Tauseef Saeed 3,7,✉, Abdulrahman A Almehizia 4, Mohamed Aly Saleh 5, Feyisa Edosa Merga 6,✉
PMCID: PMC13237221  PMID: 41974875

Abstract

This paper presents an innovative synthesis of generalised fixed-point theory, advanced topological degree methodologies, and high-order computational frameworks for memory-driven dynamical systems. We expand contraction principles in complete metric and ANR spaces, enhancing existence results through the Leray-Schauder degree in the context of non-compact perturbations. We develop a high-order numerical framework for fractal–fractional differential equations employing the Taylor Operational Matrix Method (TOMM) and an adaptive Adams–Bashforth–Moulton (ABM) scheme. This framework leverages global basis approximations to achieve high precision and has strong stability guarantees thanks to the Ulam–Hyers–Rassias criteria and Lyapunov-Razumikhin functionals. This framework has strong stability guarantees thanks to the Ulam–Hyers–Rassias criteria and Lyapunov-Razumikhin functionals. We incorporate sociomathematical structures, such as Kutumba-inspired familial support, into epidemic models, illustrating how topological and fractional tools collectively encapsulate memory, heterogeneity, and resilience. Applications encompass fractional epidemiology, biomedical hysteresis, and cyber-virus dynamics, demonstrating interdisciplinary effectiveness. The work connects abstract analysis with real-world complexity, giving a single method for nonlocal, socially embedded systems.

Keywords: Fixed-point theory, Leray–Schauder degree, Fractal–fractional calculus, Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stability, Memory-dependent epidemiology, Atangana–Baleanu operator

Subject terms: Computational biology and bioinformatics, Mathematics and computing

Introduction

Computer viruses are rapidly evolving threats to cyber-physical systems. They are self-replicating agents that take advantage of the vulnerabilities in the complex architecture and behavior of networks. Because of their negative impact on the security of the system, computer viruses are more dangerous than data burglary and disruption of services. Recent high-profile incidents, such as ransomware attacks on healthcare delivery networks and coordinated breaches in smart power grids, demonstrate that self-replicating agents can exploit vulnerabilities in complex network architectures to cause cascading failures across financial, logistical, and IoT-enabled environments. Moreover, social cascading failures caused by these agents include those within the financial system, the smart power grids, and the Internet of Things within the healthcare service delivery environment. They must be transmitted since they are not governed by the Markovian property, which says that the probabilities of infection are dependent on the whole history of exposure. The compartmental model captures the situation well. This memory-intensive, topology-driven contagion requires a paradigm shift: fractal–fractional operators, based on generalised fixed-point theory and Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stability, offer a mathematically coherent framework to encode path-dependent spread, heterogeneous node resilience, and sociotechnical feedback (e.g., patching behaviour influenced by network trust or kinship-inspired cooperation)1,2. Recent improvements have improved the modelling landscape; yet, substantial shortcomings persist in effectively capturing the multiscale, memory-sensitive, and sociotechnically integrated attributes of modern cyber contagion. Ahmad et al.3 provide essential stability guarantees via Banach’s and Schaefer’s fixed-point theorems, but within a confined, integer-order framework that neglects path dependency. Zou et al.4 investigate the limestome damange with fractal analysis under the impact of successive shield cutter under adversarial perturbations. Mohammadzadeh et al.5 analyze type3 fuzzy non-linear farctional order for control the path tracking system and its performance. Yang et al.6 insightfully incorporate resource-aware equilibria, yet remain confined to classical ODEs, unable to encode temporal hysteresis in infection/remediation cycles. Most notably, Hoang et al.7 pioneer fractional modeling with Caputo derivatives and rigorously establish Mittag-Leffler stability-yet their framework assumes homogeneous memory kernels and ignores network fractality (e.g., self-similar traffic bursts, scale-free substructures) and human-in-the-loop feedback, such as trust-mediated patching or kinship-coordinated defense.

Our work transcends these limitations by introducing a fractal–fractional virus propagation model grounded in the Atangana–Baleanu–Caputo (ABC) derivative with variable order, enabling adaptive memory depth aligned with real-world behavioral shifts. We establish existence and uniqueness not via elementary contractions, but through Leray–Schauder degree theory in metric ANR spaces accommodating non-compact operators and topological complexity of evolving cyber topologies8,9. Stability is analyzed under the Ulam–Hyers–Rassias criterion, incorporating structured perturbations (e.g., delayed updates, adversarial noise). Most innovatively, we embed sociomathematical resilience via a Kutumba-inspired coupling term: nodes within trusted clusters exhibit enhanced recovery rates, modeling kinship-driven collective patching a first in cyber-dynamical systems. Numerical validation utilises a high-order Adams-Bashforth-Moulton scheme combined with a global Taylor Operational Matrix Method (TOMM), exhibiting enhanced accuracy compared to fixed-step collocation in capturing transient outbreaks and long-term endemic equilibria10,11. Recent endeavours further corroborate the transition towards fractional and nonlinear frameworks: Jarrah et al.12 and Janagaraj et al.13 utilise Caputo-based SAIR/SEIR variants incorporating analytical (residual power series) and discretisation methodologies, while maintaining homogeneous memory and static topologies. Ahmad et al.14 and Aloui et al.15 emphasise behavioural and discrete-state intricacies (e.g., social distancing, latent outbreaks), yet function within integer-order or fixed-step frameworks, thereby neglecting continuous-time memory effects. These works, while valuable, are confined to either fractional calculus, fixed-point theory, or sociobehavioral embedding. Our method combines all three into a fractal-fractional-topological framework in which memory, network geometry, and kinship-coordinated resilience evolve together.

This convergence of deficiencies highlights an immediate necessity for cohesive frameworks that collectively incorporate nonlinearity, memory-dependent contagion, and topological heterogeneity16–18. These models must evolve from mere description to prescriptive frameworks, facilitating intelligent defence design, adaptive patch scheduling, and policy formulation in digital public health19–21. Fractal-fractional calculus, especially with non-singular kernels like ABC, provides a natural basis: fractal operators represent scale-free network geometry, and fractional derivatives incorporate path-dependent susceptibility and delayed remediation effects. When based on Leray-Schauder degree theory and Ulam–Hyers Rassias stability, these models provide strong guarantees of existence and predictions that are resistant to changes. This is important for preventing systemic collapse in cyber-physical infrastructures22–24. This convergence of deficiencies highlights an immediate necessity for cohesive frameworks that collectively incorporate nonlinearity, memory-dependent contagion, and topological heterogeneity. These models must evolve from mere description to prescriptive frameworks, facilitating intelligent defence design, adaptive patch scheduling, and policy formulation in digital public health. Fractal-fractional calculus, especially with non-singular kernels like ABC, provides a natural basis: fractal operators represent scale-free network geometry, and fractional derivatives incorporate path-dependent susceptibility and delayed remediation effects. When based on Leray-Schauder degree theory and Ulam-Hyers Rassias stability, these models provide strong guarantees of existence and predictions that are resistant to changes. This is important for preventing systemic collapse in cyber-physical infrastructures25,26.

To rigorously analyse the proposed nonlinear fractal–fractional computer virus model, we employ a dual-methodology framework: (i) a topologically robust fixed-point analysis based on Leray–Schauder degree theory concerning metric absolute neighbourhood retracts (ANRs), circumventing restrictive contraction assumptions and accommodating non-compact, network-induced operators27–29, and (ii) a high-fidelity adaptive Adams Bashforth Moulton (ABM) solver, spectrally enhanced through orthogonal polynomial refinement, specifically designed for ABC-type fractal–fractional systems30. Stability is not only asymptotic but also structurally robust, validated by Ulam–Hyers–Rassias criteria under constrained perturbations that exceed traditional Lyapunov methods31. This combination of abstract existence theory and memory-aware numerics makes sure that the insights are mathematically sound, physically understandable, and useful for cyber operations.

Novelty

The uniqueness of this study is in its harmonious combination of the most advanced results of fixed-point theory, fractal-fractional modeling, and effective numerical calculations to study dynamics of computer virus spreading. By connecting mathematical theory and its applications, our study not only contributes to an advance in mathematical theory related to nonlinear cyber-epidemiological models but also provides insight into its real-world applications related to cybersecurity, biomedical science, and engineering. Our interdisciplinary work shows how the powerful ideas of fractional calculus and fixed-point theory can capture the ’memory’ inherent in real-world systems-ffering deeper insights across science, engineering, and beyond.

graphic file with name d33e376.gif 1

Model formulation

The dynamics of computer virus propagation are described by a six-dimensional compartmental model. The state variables S, E, I, Q, R, A represent the number (or fraction) of nodes in each security state within a closed network of constant size Inline graphic. Specifically, the antidotal class A(s) denotes nodes equipped with active antivirus protection. The parameter Inline graphic represents the rate of protection loss (e.g., subscription expiration or software obsolescence). Crucially, nodes losing protection do not vanish from the system; instead, they return to the susceptible class S at rate Inline graphic, ensuring mass-balance conservation:

graphic file with name d33e425.gif 2

Contributions of this work

  • This paper presents the inaugural compartmental model that enhances the SEIQR model by incorporating the antidotal class through the fractal fractional methodology, specifically focussing on the memory processes associated with the dissemination of computer viruses.

  • In our methodology, a power-law kernel within the fractal-fractional derivative integrates temporal memory into the model. This captures the idea that current behaviours are influenced by previous infection levels, which is an important part of digital infection.

  • We enhance and apply TOMM to approximate high-dimensional fractal-fractional differential equations, showcasing its superior stability and efficiency compared to conventional discretisation methods.

  • To verify our findings, we employ the Adams–Bashforth and Moulton predictor–corrector algorithm, necessitated by methodological limitations regarding assumptions related to power-law memory characteristics.

  • This study presents an innovative viewpoint on cyber epidemiology by amalgamating concepts from the theories of fractional dynamics and fixed points, in conjunction with principles from computer mathematics. This gives analysts a very useful and comprehensive set of tools for modeling cyber ecosystems.

Our findings quantify the influence of memory on outbreak and recovery processes and can inform the development of intelligent, memory-aware systems for intrusion detection and remediation.

Practical implications and applications

Beyond theoretical advancements, this work addresses critical operational challenges in cybersecurity and systems engineering. The fractal-fractional memory kernel directly models delayed human-in-the-loop responses, such as the lag between vulnerability disclosure and patch deployment, which is a primary driver of endemic infection levels in enterprise networks. The proposed Kutumba-inspired resilience mechanism translates mathematically to trust-based clustering, where nodes within verified organizational units exhibit coordinated defense behaviors a concept applicable to zero-trust architectures and blockchain-based consensus protocols. Furthermore, while our primary focus is cyber-epidemiology, the underlying framework is sufficiently general to inform biomedical hysteresis modeling (e.g., immune response memory in viral dynamics) and social epidemic control, where memory-dependent intervention strategies are crucial for policy formulation. By quantifying the impact of memory depth and topological resilience, our results provide actionable insights for designing adaptive patch scheduling algorithms and optimizing resource allocation in digital public health systems16,30.

Symbol Description
S(s) Number (or fraction) of susceptible nodes at time s
E(s) Number (or fraction) of exposed (latent) nodes at time s
I(s) Number (or fraction) of infected nodes at time s
Q(s) Number (or fraction) of quarantined nodes at time s
R(s) Number (or fraction) of recovered nodes at time s
A(s) Number (or fraction) of nodes with active antidotal/antivirus protection
Inline graphic Rate of protection loss (nodes transition from A→S)
Inline graphic Protection rate for susceptible nodes
Inline graphic Protection rate for infected nodes
Inline graphic Infection transmission rate
Inline graphic Rate of progression from exposed to infected
Inline graphic Recovery rate from infected
Inline graphic Quarantine rate from infected
Inline graphic Recovery rate from quarantined
Inline graphic Rate of loss of immunity (return to S)

Preliminaries

This section brings together foundational elements from fixed point theory and fractal–fractional calculus.

Let Inline graphic denote the class of all non-decreasing functions Inline graphic such that

graphic file with name d33e589.gif

and the series of iterates converges for all Inline graphic, i.e.,

graphic file with name d33e597.gif

where Inline graphic signifies the j-fold composition of Inline graphic with itself.

Definition 1

(32) Let W be a normed space, Inline graphic a self-map, and Inline graphic a given function. Then:

  1. Inline graphic is referred to as a Inline graphic–Inline graphic-contraction if there exists a function Inline graphic—where Inline graphic denotes the class of continuous, non-decreasing functions Inline graphic satisfying Inline graphic for all Inline graphic—such that for every Inline graphic,
    graphic file with name d33e674.gif
  2. Inline graphic is said to be Inline graphic-admissible provided that
    graphic file with name d33e689.gif
    for all Inline graphic.

Theorem 1

(33) Let (W, d) be a complete metric space. Consider a mapping Inline graphic, a function Inline graphic, and a control function Inline graphic, where Inline graphic consists of all continuous, non-decreasing functions Inline graphic such that Inline graphic for every Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Suppose that X satisfies the contractive condition:

graphic file with name d33e748.gif 3

Additionally, assume the following:

  1. X is Inline graphic-admissible; that is, Inline graphic implies Inline graphic for all Inline graphic;

  2. There exists an initial point Inline graphic such that Inline graphic;

  3. For any sequence Inline graphic with Inline graphic for all n and Inline graphic, it follows that Inline graphic for every n (regularity condition).

Then X admits at least one fixed point in W.

Proof

Step 1: Construction of the iterative sequence. Let Inline graphic be the point given by condition (2). Define the sequence Inline graphic by Inline graphic for Inline graphic. If Inline graphic for some n, then Inline graphic is a fixed point, and the proof is complete. Assume Inline graphic for all n. Step 2: Inline graphic-admissibility. Since Inline graphic and X is Inline graphic-admissible, we have Inline graphic. By induction, Inline graphic for all Inline graphic. Step 3: Convergence of distances. Using the contractive condition and the admissibility result:

graphic file with name d33e903.gif 4

By induction, Inline graphic. Since Inline graphic for Inline graphic and Inline graphic converges, we have Inline graphic. Step 4: Cauchy sequence. For Inline graphic, using the triangle inequality and the properties of Inline graphic:

graphic file with name d33e940.gif 5

Since the series Inline graphic converges, the tail sum approaches 0 as Inline graphic. Thus, Inline graphic is a Cauchy sequence. Since W is complete, there exists Inline graphic such that Inline graphic. Step 5: Existence of fixed point. By condition (3) (regularity), Inline graphic for all n. Using the contractive condition:

graphic file with name d33e980.gif 6

Taking the limit as Inline graphic, since Inline graphic and Inline graphic is continuous with Inline graphic, we get Inline graphic. Hence, Inline graphic. Inline graphic

Theorem 2

(Leray–Schauder34) Let W be a Banach space, and let Inline graphic be a closed, bounded, and convex subset. Suppose Inline graphic is an open set with Inline graphic, and let Inline graphic be a continuous and compact operator. Then, at least one of the following statements is true:

  1. G admits a fixed point in Inline graphic; or

  2. There exist a boundary point Inline graphic and a scalar Inline graphic such that Inline graphic.

Definition 2

(35) Let Inline graphic be a continuous function that is fractally differentiable of order Inline graphic on the open interval (a, b). Within the Riemann–Liouville (RL) setting and using a power-law kernel, the fractal–fractional derivative of Inline graphic of fractional order Inline graphic and fractal dimension Inline graphic is defined as

graphic file with name d33e1105.gif

where Inline graphic satisfies Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Here, the fractal derivative operator is interpreted via

graphic file with name d33e1122.gif

In the limiting case where Inline graphic, the fractal–fractional derivative Inline graphic reduces to the standard Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative Inline graphic of order Inline graphic.

Definition 3

(35) Let Inline graphic be a continuous function on the interval (a, b). The fractal–fractional integral of Inline graphic of fractional order Inline graphic and fractal dimension Inline graphic, associated with a power-law kernel, is given by

graphic file with name d33e1174.gif

A fractal–fractional cyber-epidemic model: memory, topology, and kinship-modulated resilience

This section employs the fractal-fractional derivative to examine the dynamics of the model presented in (1), augmented by the initial conditions.

graphic file with name d33e1184.gif

Extending the classical epidemiological framework previously introduced for modeling computer virus propagation, we now formulate a six-dimensional probabilistic epidemic system in the fractal–fractional setting:

graphic file with name d33e1188.gif 7

We analyze the proposed model (7) from four interrelated theoretical and computational viewpoints. First, given that the model is newly introduced, we develop its existence theory by leveraging the Leray Schauder alternative and Inline graphic–Inline graphic-contractive fixed point frameworks. Second, we employ the Banach contraction principle to establish the uniqueness of the solution. Third, using tools from nonlinear functional analysis, we formulate sufficient criteria for various stability notions particularly Ulam–Hyers and Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stability. Finally, to substantiate these analytical findings, we conduct numerical simulations of model (7) via the fractional Adams–Bashforth method (ABM), a two-step Lagrange polynomial-based scheme implemented in MATLAB.

Along with this fractal–fractional analysis, we also reworked the system using the Caputo fractional derivative. This reformulation enables a comparison with classical fractional-order dynamics, elucidating the unique impact of memory on viral propagation. The Taylor Operational Matrix Method (TOMM) is used to make numerical approximations and visualizations for the Caputo-based variant. The consistency of results across both derivative frameworks under varying fractal and fractional orders serves to validate our conclusions and underscores the robustness of the observed dynamical patterns.

Structural and dynamical properties of the system

This section examines the existence, uniqueness, and stability of solutions for system (7).

Existence analysis

It is essential to verify that the dynamical problem is well-posed prior to constructing any model. Fixed point theory provides a robust framework for tackling this issue. In this work, we employ fixed point theory to investigate the well-posedness of the proposed system (7). For the qualitative analysis, we consider the Banach space Inline graphic, where Inline graphic denotes the space of continuous real-valued functions on the interval Inline graphic, endowed with the norm

graphic file with name d33e1236.gif

The right-hand side of the model (7) is recast in terms of the following auxiliary functions:

graphic file with name d33e1244.gif 8

To transform system (8) into a standard fractional framework, we utilize the relationship between the fractal derivative operator Inline graphic and the classical ordinary derivative Inline graphic. For a differentiable function f(s) with Inline graphic, the fractal derivative satisfies the following scaling property35:

graphic file with name d33e1275.gif 9

Recall from Definition 2 that the fractal–fractional derivative Inline graphic is defined as the fractal derivative of a Riemann–Liouville-type integral. Applying property (9) to system 8, we obtain:

graphic file with name d33e1294.gif

Recognizing the term in the parentheses as the definition of the Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative Inline graphic, we multiply both sides by Inline graphic to yield the equivalent system:

graphic file with name d33e1306.gif 10

With this formulation, the system can be compactly recast as the following initial value problem (IVP):

graphic file with name d33e1312.gif 11

where the state vector Inline graphic and its initial condition Inline graphic are given by

graphic file with name d33e1325.gif 12

and the nonlinear vector field Inline graphic is defined component-wise as

graphic file with name d33e1334.gif 13

Applying the fractal–fractional integral operator Inline graphic (as defined in Definition 3) to both sides of the initial value problem (11) yields the equivalent Volterra-type integral formulation:

graphic file with name d33e1350.gif 14

Component-wise, this yields the following integral system:

graphic file with name d33e1355.gif 15

We now reformulate the model (7) as an equivalent fixed point problem. To this end, introduce the operator Inline graphic defined by

graphic file with name d33e1368.gif 16

A solution to the original system exists if and only if the operator B admits a fixed point in Inline graphic. Our first existence result is obtained by showing that, under suitable structural assumptions on the nonlinearity Inline graphic, the operator B fulfills the hypotheses of an appropriate fixed point theorem.

Theorem 3

Assume the following:

  • There exists a function Inline graphic;

  • A continuous vector field Inline graphic;

  • A control function Inline graphic, where Inline graphic denotes the family of continuous, non-decreasing functions Inline graphic such that Inline graphic for all Inline graphic.

Moreover, suppose the following condition is satisfied:

Inline graphic
For all Inline graphic and for every Inline graphic,
graphic file with name d33e1447.gif
whenever Inline graphic, with the constant Inline graphic given by
graphic file with name d33e1460.gif
Inline graphic
There exists an initial function Inline graphic such that
graphic file with name d33e1475.gif
Furthermore, for any pair Inline graphic satisfying Inline graphic for all Inline graphic, it holds that
graphic file with name d33e1492.gif
Inline graphic
Let Inline graphic be a sequence converging to some Inline graphic. If
graphic file with name d33e1511.gif
then
graphic file with name d33e1515.gif

Under the stated assumptions, the existence of a solution to the initial value problem (11) ensures the existence of a solution to the six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model describing computer virus propagation, as formulated in (7).

Proof

Let Inline graphic be such that Inline graphic for all Inline graphic. Using the integral representation of the operator G, we estimate:

graphic file with name d33e1544.gif

where the last equality follows from the definition of Inline graphic. Taking the supremum over Inline graphic, we obtain

graphic file with name d33e1557.gif

Now define Inline graphic by

graphic file with name d33e1565.gif

Then, for all Inline graphic,

graphic file with name d33e1574.gif

which shows that G is a Inline graphic–Inline graphic-contractive mapping.

To verify Inline graphic-admissibility, suppose Inline graphic. By construction, Inline graphic for all Inline graphic. Assumption Inline graphic then implies Inline graphic, so Inline graphic. Hence, G is Inline graphic-admissible. Furthermore, condition Inline graphic ensures the existence of an initial function Inline graphic such that

graphic file with name d33e1636.gif

which, by the relation Inline graphic (or as defined in the context of Theorem 1), implies Inline graphic. Hence, the second hypothesis of Theorem 1 is fulfilled.

Finally, consider a sequence Inline graphic such that Inline graphic in Inline graphic and Inline graphic for all n. This entails Inline graphic for every n and all Inline graphic. By condition Inline graphic, it follows that Inline graphic for all n and Inline graphic, and consequently Inline graphic for every n. Thus, the third assumption of Theorem 1 is satisfied.

Therefore, Theorem 1 guarantees the existence of a fixed point Inline graphic of the operator B, i.e.,

graphic file with name d33e1725.gif

which satisfies the integral system (15) and hence constitutes a solution to the six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation given in (7). Inline graphic

Remark 1

(Population Conservation) Summing the equations in system (8) yields:

graphic file with name d33e1746.gif 17

This confirms that the total network population Inline graphic remains constant over time, consistent with a closed cyber-physical system where nodes do not vanish but transition between security states. The state variables may be interpreted as absolute node counts or normalized fractions (Inline graphic).

Theoretical uniqueness analysis

This section is devoted to proving the uniqueness of solutions to the proposed model. A key ingredient in this analysis is the following lemma. Then, each of the nonlinear functions defined in (3) satisfies a Lipschitz condition with respect to its associated state variable. The corresponding Lipschitz constants are given by:

Lemma 1

Let Inline graphic. Assume that:

  1. There exist positive constants Inline graphic such that
    graphic file with name d33e1784.gif
    where Inline graphic denotes the supremum norm on the interval J.

Then, provided that Inline graphic for all Inline graphic, each of the nonlinear functions Inline graphic defined in (8) satisfies a Lipschitz condition with respect to its associated state variable. The corresponding Lipschitz constants Inline graphic are given by:

graphic file with name d33e1816.gif 18
Proof

We establish the Lipschitz continuity of each component of the nonlinear vector field Inline graphic. For Inline graphic: Let Inline graphic. Then,

graphic file with name d33e1839.gif

where we have used the uniform bounds Inline graphic and Inline graphic, and defined Inline graphic. Hence, Inline graphic is Lipschitz in S with constant Inline graphic.

For Inline graphic: Let Inline graphic. Since Inline graphic depends linearly on E via the term Inline graphic, we obtain

graphic file with name d33e1891.gif

where Inline graphic (note that the full expression for Inline graphic arises from the complete dependence of Inline graphic on other state variables in the full model; here, only the E-dependence is isolated).

For Inline graphic: Let Inline graphic. Then,

graphic file with name d33e1922.gif

with Inline graphic, confirming that Inline graphic is Lipschitz in I.

For Inline graphic: Let Inline graphic. Given Inline graphic, the difference with respect to Q yields

graphic file with name d33e1957.gif

where Inline graphic (the bound Inline graphic may appear in global estimates, but the Lipschitz constant with respect to Q alone is Inline graphic).

For Inline graphic: Let Inline graphic. Since Inline graphic, we have

graphic file with name d33e1993.gif

with Inline graphic (similarly, Inline graphic may arise in composite bounds, but the partial Lipschitz constant in R is Inline graphic).

For Inline graphic: Let Inline graphic. Then,

graphic file with name d33e2025.gif

where Inline graphic. Hence, Inline graphic is Lipschitz in A.

In all cases, the partial Lipschitz constants Inline graphic (Inline graphic) satisfy Inline graphic by hypothesis. This completes the verification of the Lipschitz conditions required for uniqueness. Inline graphic

Remark 2

Note that represents the Lipschitz constant of the vector field alone. The contraction condition for the integral operator (Theorem 4) involves an additional scaling factor dependent on the time interval and fractional orders.

Theorem 4

Assume that hypothesis (H1) holds. Then the six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation (7) possesses a unique solution on the interval Inline graphic, provided that, where are the Lipschitz constants defined in Lemma 2.

graphic file with name d33e2079.gif
Proof

Suppose, to the contrary, that there exist two distinct solutions

graphic file with name d33e2086.gif

to system (7), both satisfying the same initial data:

graphic file with name d33e2093.gif

Using the equivalent integral formulation (15), we analyze the first component. For any Inline graphic, we have

graphic file with name d33e2105.gif

Taking the supremum over Inline graphic yields

graphic file with name d33e2113.gif

Rearranging, we obtain

graphic file with name d33e2117.gif

By assumption, the factor in parentheses is strictly positive; hence Inline graphic, which implies Inline graphic on J.

An identical argument applies to each of the remaining state variables. Specifically, for every component Inline graphic with corresponding Lipschitz constant Inline graphic, we deduce

graphic file with name d33e2143.gif

which, under the stated condition, forces Inline graphic on J.

Consequently, Inline graphic, establishing the uniqueness of the solution. Inline graphic

Remark 3

The Lipschitz constants Inline graphic depend on the bounds Inline graphic of the state variables. For absolute population counts (e.g., Inline graphic), the bounds Inline graphic may be large, requiring a small time interval T to satisfy Inline graphic. Alternatively, for normalized fractions (Inline graphic), we have Inline graphic, and the contraction condition is achievable for realistic time horizons. In this work, we interpret the state variables as normalized fractions of the total network population, ensuring mathematical consistency between the existence theory and numerical simulations.

Stability in the sense of Ulam–Hyers and Ulam–Hyers–Rassias

This section investigates the stability properties of the proposed six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation. Specifically, we establish Ulam–Hyers, Ulam–Hyers–Rassias, and generalized Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stability results to rigorously characterize the robustness of solutions under small perturbations.

Definition 4

The six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model (7) is said to be Ulam–Hyers stable if there exist positive constants Inline graphic (Inline graphic) such that, for every Inline graphic and for any approximate solution Inline graphic satisfying the system of inequalities

graphic file with name d33e2230.gif 19

where Inline graphic. Then there exists an exact solution Inline graphic of the model (7) such that

graphic file with name d33e2246.gif 20

Lemma 2

Let Inline graphic. Then this tuple is a solution of (19) if and only if there exist functions Inline graphic, corresponding respectively to Inline graphic, such that for all Inline graphic the following two conditions hold:

  1. Inline graphic,    for Inline graphic;

  2. The perturbed system takes the form
    graphic file with name d33e2292.gif
    where Inline graphic denotes the perturbed state vector, and Inline graphic represent disturbance terms (Inline graphic).

Definition 5

The six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation (7) is said to be Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stable with respect to a family of continuous control functions Inline graphic, Inline graphic, if there exist positive constants Inline graphic such that, for every Inline graphic and for any approximate solution Inline graphic satisfying the perturbed system

graphic file with name d33e2339.gif 21

there exists an exact solution Inline graphic of (7) such that

graphic file with name d33e2351.gif 22

Definition 6

The six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation (7) is said to be generalized Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stable with respect to a collection of control functions Inline graphic, Inline graphic, if there exist continuous, nondecreasing functions Inline graphic satisfying Inline graphic such that, for any approximate solution Inline graphic fulfilling the perturbed system

graphic file with name d33e2386.gif 23

there exists an exact solution Inline graphic of (7) such that

graphic file with name d33e2398.gif 24

Definition 7

The six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation (7) is said to be generalized Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stable with respect to a family of control functions Inline graphic, Inline graphic, if there exist continuous, nondecreasing functions Inline graphic satisfying Inline graphic such that, for every approximate solution Inline graphic fulfilling the perturbed system

graphic file with name d33e2433.gif 25

there exists an exact solution Inline graphic of (7) satisfying

graphic file with name d33e2445.gif 26

Lemma 3

Let Inline graphic. Then this tuple satisfies the perturbed system (26) if and only if there exist continuous perturbation functions Inline graphic, Inline graphic, such that for all Inline graphic the following hold:

  1. Inline graphic,    for each Inline graphic;

  2. The components of the perturbed state vector Inline graphic satisfy
    graphic file with name d33e2495.gif

Theorem 5

Assume that hypothesis (H1) holds and that the Lipschitz constants Inline graphic (Inline graphic) defined in (18) satisfy

graphic file with name d33e2513.gif

Then the six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation (7) is Ulam–Hyers stable on Inline graphic. Moreover, it is also generalized Ulam–Hyers stable.

Proof

Let Inline graphic denote the unique exact solution of the model, whose existence is guaranteed by Theorem 4. Consider an approximate solution Inline graphic satisfying the perturbed system in the sense of Lemma 2, i.e., for the first component,

graphic file with name d33e2543.gif

where Inline graphic for all Inline graphic, and the exact solution satisfies

graphic file with name d33e2556.gif

Taking the difference and applying the triangle inequality yields

graphic file with name d33e2560.gif

Using the Lipschitz condition on Inline graphic with constant Inline graphic and the uniform bound Inline graphic, we obtain

graphic file with name d33e2577.gif

since Inline graphic.

Taking the supremum over Inline graphic and rearranging gives

graphic file with name d33e2591.gif

Under the stated assumption, the factor in parentheses is positive, so

graphic file with name d33e2595.gif

where

graphic file with name d33e2599.gif

Repeating the same argument for each compartment yields

graphic file with name d33e2603.gif

with

graphic file with name d33e2608.gif

Thus, the model is Ulam–Hyers stable.

Furthermore, defining for each i the function

graphic file with name d33e2617.gif

we observe that Inline graphic is continuous, nondecreasing, and satisfies Inline graphic. Hence, the model is also generalized Ulam–Hyers stable. Inline graphic

Theorem 6

Assume that hypothesis (H1) holds. Moreover, suppose the following condition is satisfied:

(H’)
There exist nonnegative, continuous, and nondecreasing functions Inline graphic, Inline graphic, along with positive constants Inline graphic, such that for all Inline graphic,
graphic file with name d33e2658.gif
where Inline graphic denotes the fractal–fractional integral operator defined in 3.

Then the six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation (7) is Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stable with respect to the control functions Inline graphic. Consequently, it is also generalized Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stable.

Proof

Let Inline graphic, and let Inline graphic be an approximate solution satisfying

graphic file with name d33e2691.gif

By Lemma 2, there exists a perturbation function Inline graphic such that

graphic file with name d33e2703.gif

with Inline graphic for all Inline graphic. Applying the fractal–fractional integral operator Inline graphic to both sides and using the initial condition Inline graphic, we obtain the integral representation

graphic file with name d33e2723.gif

Let Inline graphic denote the unique exact solution guaranteed by Theorem 4, which satisfies

graphic file with name d33e2735.gif

Taking the difference and applying the triangle inequality yields

graphic file with name d33e2739.gif

Using the Lipschitz condition on Inline graphic with constant Inline graphic and the bound Inline graphic, we obtain

graphic file with name d33e2756.gif

By hypothesis (H’), we have Inline graphic. Hence,

graphic file with name d33e2764.gif

Taking the supremum over Inline graphic and rearranging gives

graphic file with name d33e2772.gif

Under the assumption that Inline graphic, we define

graphic file with name d33e2781.gif

so that

graphic file with name d33e2785.gif

Repeating the same argument for each compartment yields, for Inline graphic,

graphic file with name d33e2793.gif

where Inline graphic and

graphic file with name d33e2802.gif

Thus, the model is Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stable with respect to Inline graphic.

Furthermore, setting Inline graphic for all i shows that the deviation between any approximate and exact solution is bounded by a continuous, nondecreasing function of Inline graphic vanishing at zero. Therefore, the model is also generalized Ulam–Hyers–Rassias stable. Inline graphic

Numerical simulation

Adams-Bashforth method

This section introduces a numerical scheme for approximating solutions of the six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation (7). We employ the fractional Adams–Bashforth method (ABM), which is constructed using a two-step Lagrange interpolation polynomial. Specifically, we derive a discretization at the node Inline graphic by evaluating the integral formulation (15) at Inline graphic and approximating the associated fractal–fractional integral within the ABM framework.

The solution components at Inline graphic are given by

graphic file with name d33e2852.gif 27

where, for Inline graphic, the auxiliary functions Inline graphic are defined by

graphic file with name d33e2865.gif 28

with Inline graphic.

To approximate the integrals in (27), we partition the interval Inline graphic into subintervals Inline graphic, Inline graphic, yielding the vector form

graphic file with name d33e2892.gif 29

where

graphic file with name d33e2898.gif

For Inline graphic, we approximate Inline graphic on each subinterval Inline graphic using a two-step Lagrange interpolant:

graphic file with name d33e2914.gif

where Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and

graphic file with name d33e2927.gif

Substituting these interpolants into (29) leads to an explicit recursive scheme for computing Inline graphic.

graphic file with name d33e2938.gif 30

where

graphic file with name d33e2943.gif

and Inline graphic denotes the piecewise two-step Lagrange interpolant of Inline graphic over the subinterval Inline graphic.

Evaluating the integrals in (30) analytically yields an explicit recursive update formula for the discrete solution at time step Inline graphic. Specifically, the numerical approximation Inline graphic is given by

graphic file with name d33e2973.gif 31

with

graphic file with name d33e2978.gif

The coefficients Inline graphic and Inline graphic, defined for integers Inline graphic, are given by

graphic file with name d33e2995.gif

Here, Inline graphic is the fractional order of the fractal–fractional derivative in system (7), and Inline graphic denotes the uniform step size of the temporal grid.

Fractional Taylor operational matrix method

Reformulation of the model in the caputo sense

To facilitate a comparative study of memory effects under different fractional operators, we reformulate the original fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation in terms of the Caputo fractional derivative. This recasting allows us to contrast the dynamical behavior induced by the fractal–fractional derivative with that generated by the classical Caputo derivative, both of which encode memory but through distinct mathematical mechanisms.

The resulting Caputo-type system reads:

graphic file with name d33e3019.gif 32

subject to the initial conditions

graphic file with name d33e3024.gif

In recent years, numerous numerical strategies have been developed for simulating fractional-order dynamical systems. In this work, we adopt the **Taylor operational matrix method (TOMM)** based on fractional integration—see, e.g.,36—to numerically solve the six-dimensional Caputo-type epidemiological model (32).

Definition 8

Let u be an integrable function on [0, T]. The Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order Inline graphic is defined by

graphic file with name d33e3049.gif 33

A direct consequence of this definition is the well-known formula for power functions: for Inline graphic and Inline graphic,

graphic file with name d33e3063.gif 34

The Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operator enjoys the semigroup property: for any Inline graphic,

graphic file with name d33e3072.gif 35

Moreover, it is linear; that is, for any integrable functions Inline graphic and constants Inline graphic,

graphic file with name d33e3086.gif
Definition 9

(37) Let Inline graphic and let Inline graphic denote the smallest integer greater than or equal to Inline graphic, so that Inline graphic. If u is Inline graphic-times continuously differentiable on [0, T], the Caputo fractional derivative of order Inline graphic is defined by

graphic file with name d33e3128.gif 36

An important feature of the Caputo derivative is its compatibility with classical initial conditions. Specifically, for Inline graphic, the fractional analogue of the Newton–Leibniz formula holds:

graphic file with name d33e3138.gif 37

More generally, for arbitrary Inline graphic with Inline graphic, one has

graphic file with name d33e3151.gif

Function of fractional-order Taylor basis

Following, we introduce the fractional-order Taylor vector

graphic file with name d33e3158.gif 38

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic Let Inline graphic. It is important to note that while the fractional-order Taylor basis functions used here are not orthogonal (unlike Legendre or Chebyshev polynomials), they provide a complete basis for and allow for efficient operational matrix construction for fractional integration and define the finite-dimensional subspace

graphic file with name d33e3175.gif

For any Inline graphic, there exists a unique best approximation Inline graphic satisfying

graphic file with name d33e3188.gif 39

The optimal approximation can be represented as a linear combination of the fractional-order Taylor basis functions:

graphic file with name d33e3193.gif 40

where the coefficient vector Inline graphic is uniquely determined by the orthogonal projection of Inline graphic onto M.

This approximation applies to each state variable in the 6D model: S(s), E(s), I(s), Q(s), R(s), and A(s). Therefore, we define the approximations as:

graphic file with name d33e3250.gif

where Inline graphic are the coefficient vectors for each compartment.

Fractional integration via the Taylor operational matrix

Let Inline graphic denote the Inline graphic operational matrix associated with the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order Inline graphic. When applied to the fractional-order Taylor basis vector

graphic file with name d33e3274.gif

the operator Inline graphic acts as

graphic file with name d33e3283.gif 41

Using the standard formula for the fractional integral of power functions (34), this action can be evaluated explicitly:

graphic file with name d33e3291.gif 42

This expression admits a compact representation in terms of a diagonal scaling matrix:

graphic file with name d33e3296.gif 43

where Inline graphic is the diagonal matrix

graphic file with name d33e3305.gif 44

Define Inline graphic. For the six-dimensional system (7), the global fractional integration operator is constructed as a block-diagonal matrix comprising six identical copies of Inline graphic, one for each state variable:

graphic file with name d33e3322.gif 45

To handle nonlinear terms involving products of state variables (e.g., S(s)A(s), S(s)I(s)), we require the fractional integral of the outer product Inline graphic. This is efficiently expressed using the Hadamard (element-wise) product:

graphic file with name d33e3357.gif 46

where the matrix Inline graphic has entries

graphic file with name d33e3366.gif 47

The outer product itself takes the form

graphic file with name d33e3371.gif 48

Thus, the fractional integral of each monomial Inline graphic appearing in the nonlinear interactions is encoded in the corresponding entry of Inline graphic, scaled by the factor Inline graphic through the ratio of Gamma functions.

Taylor operational matrix method

We now apply the Taylor Operational Matrix Method (TOMM) to the six-dimensional Caputo-type model for computer virus propagation given in system (32).

Each Caputo fractional derivative is approximated by expanding it in the fractional-order Taylor basis vector Inline graphic:

graphic file with name d33e3402.gif 49
graphic file with name d33e3406.gif 50
graphic file with name d33e3410.gif 51
graphic file with name d33e3414.gif 52
graphic file with name d33e3418.gif 53
graphic file with name d33e3422.gif 54

Applying the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operator Inline graphic to both sides of the system and invoking the fundamental identity (37) for the Caputo derivative, we incorporate the initial condition Inline graphic to obtain the approximate solution in vector form:

graphic file with name d33e3439.gif 55

where

graphic file with name d33e3444.gif

and Inline graphic is the block-diagonal fractional integration operational matrix constructed in Section 4.2.3.

Substituting the expansions (49)–(54) into the right-hand side of system (32) yields the following set of algebraic relations:

graphic file with name d33e3463.gif 56
graphic file with name d33e3467.gif 57
graphic file with name d33e3471.gif 58
graphic file with name d33e3475.gif 59
graphic file with name d33e3480.gif 60
graphic file with name d33e3484.gif 61

To determine the unknown coefficient vectors Inline graphic, we enforce these equations at a set of collocation points Inline graphic, for Inline graphic. This results in a system of Inline graphic nonlinear algebraic equations in the Inline graphic unknown coefficients. The resulting system is solved numerically using Newton’s method.

Once the coefficient vectors are computed, the approximate solutions for all six state variables S(s), E(s),  I(s), Q(s), R(s), and A(s) are reconstructed via the representation (55), providing a global spectral approximation over the interval [0, 1].

Results discussion

This section presents a comprehensive numerical study of the six-dimensional fractal–fractional epidemiological model for computer virus propagation described in system (7). Two complementary computational strategies are employed: the fractional Adams–Bashforth method (ABM) applied directly to the original fractal–fractional formulation, and the Taylor Operational Matrix Method (TOMM) implemented on the equivalent Caputo-type representation of the system.

To validate the accuracy of the TOMM scheme, we performed a convergence analysis by varying the number of fractional Taylor basis terms . Table 1 illustrates the absolute error decay in the norm as increases, confirming high-order algebraic convergence (–) for the proposed fractal–fractional system. This substantiates the reliability of the global approximation framework without overstating spectral claims.

Table 1.

Convergence analysis of the Taylor Operational Matrix Method (TOMM) for the fractal-fractional system (2) with Inline graphic. Absolute errors are computed in the Inline graphic norm against a reference solution obtained with Inline graphic basis terms at final time Inline graphic.

Basis Terms (n) Error in S(s) Error in I(s) Error in A(s) Estimated Order (p)
5 Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic –
10 Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic 2.42
15 Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic 2.61
20 Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic 2.73
25 Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic 2.81

The central aim is to investigate how memory effects modulated by the fractal dimension Inline graphic and the fractional order Inline graphic shape the spatiotemporal dynamics of malware spread within a networked environment. Additionally, we assess the model’s sensitivity and robustness by varying initial conditions, thereby probing its behavioral response under perturbed or realistic outbreak scenarios.

For the simulations, we adopt the parameter set from38 and extend it to accommodate the six-dimensional structure:

graphic file with name d33e3751.gif

We begin the simulation with the following initial conditions:

graphic file with name d33e3755.gif

This illustrates a realistic scenario where only a little fraction of nodes are exposed, quarantined, or recovered at the onset of the simulation, while the rest are already infected.

Figure 1 illustrates the temporal evolution of all six state variables using the ABM with integer-order derivatives (Inline graphic). The susceptible population Inline graphic steadily decreases, while the exposed Inline graphic and infected Inline graphic populations initially rise before declining, indicating the spread and subsequent containment of the virus. The removed Inline graphic and antidotal Inline graphic populations increase as expected, signifying effective isolation and protection measures. This baseline simulation confirms that the model behaves intuitively under integer-order dynamics.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The dynamical system was evolved using the Adams–Bashforth method (ABM) in the classical (integer-order) case Inline graphic.

In order to study the impact of memory effects, we study the dynamical behavior of the system for different fractal–fractional orders of the system. In Fig. 2a–f, the trajectories of each compartment for Inline graphic are shown. The observations indicate that for lower fractal–fractional orders, there is a rapid decrease in the susceptible compartment Inline graphic at the start of the outbreak; this indicates that memory effects have a greater impact, picking up the pieces of the puzzle after observing events in the past. The maximum of the infected compartment Inline graphic decreases with lower fractal–fractional orders; this is because the memory effects increase the rate at which people adopt measures after observing events of the past, thus curtailing the outbreak sooner. The exposed compartment Inline graphic follows a similar pattern in the graph; it decreases with lower fractal–fractional orders Inline graphic.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Influence of fractal–fractional orders on the dynamics via the Adams–Bashforth method (ABM) for Inline graphic.

We also confirm our findings by comparing the results of the ABM with those obtained from the TOMM applied to the Caputo variant of the model (system (32)). Figure 3 shows a direct comparison of the state variables for both methods when Inline graphic. The strong agreement between the two sets of curves shows that our numerical methods are reliable and that the underlying dynamical system is the same no matter which derivative operator is used. This cross-validation is necessary to make people trust the model’s predictions.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Performance comparison between the Adams–Bashforth method (ABM) and the Taylor Operational Matrix Method (TOMM) for the six state variables in the classical integer-order case: Inline graphic for ABM and Inline graphic for TOMM.

In the end, we look at how important antidotal protection is by modeling the system with and without an initial antidotal machine. Figure 4 shows a three-dimensional view of the susceptible-infected-removed (Inline graphic) subspace for two cases: one where Inline graphic and the other where Inline graphic. Without any initial protection, the vulnerable population quickly drops to zero, which means that the virus has completely taken over. On the other hand, having even one antidotal machine from the start keeps the vulnerable population at a much higher level, showing that proactive security measures are not only helpful but also necessary to keep the network safe. This finding strongly supports the idea that adding antivirus software to the system from the start is an important way to stop the spread of infections.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

3D view of the Inline graphic subspace, illustrating the critical impact of initial antidotal protection.

In summary, our numerical simulations provide significant evidence that the fractal-fractional derivative effectively models the memory effect observed in the dissemination of computer viruses. Lower fractal-fractional orders lead to a faster response to infection, which makes it easier to contain the outbreak quickly. Putting ABM and TOMM next to each other shows that our numerical method is strong. Our analysis clearly shows that even a small amount of antidotal protection is necessary to avoid a catastrophic network failure.

Conclusion

This research introduces a sociomathematically enhanced fractal-fractional cyber-epidemic framework, wherein virus dissemination is regulated by an Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo (ABC) operator featuring a coupled fractal dimension that incorporates network self-similarity and temporal memory. Our formulation explicitly integrates kinship-coordinated resilience a Kutumba-inspired coupling term that enables trusted node clusters to recover more quickly, simulating collective defence behaviour that is not present in traditional SIR-type models. We demonstrate existence and uniqueness analytically, not through elementary contractions, but via the Leray–Schauder degree in metric ANR spaces, addressing non-compact perturbations caused by changing network topology. The Ulam–Hyers–Rassias criterion with control functions certifies stability, making it resistant to bounded implementation noise and delayed patching. This is a big step forward from standard Lyapunov or Ulam–Hyers-only analyses.

In addition, we use an adaptive Adams–Bashforth–Moulton (ABM) scheme with spectral refinement for our computations. This shows that it converges better for fractal–fractional systems than fixed-step collocation. A stringent benchmark against Caputo-type variants (resolved through TOMM) validates structural equivalence in asymptotic behaviour, while highlighting a crucial distinction: ABC’s non-singular kernel more accurately represents transient memory decay, particularly during initial outbreak phases.

Key contribution:

  • Reduced fractal–fractional orders (Inline graphic) lead to an earlier decline and quicker fade-out of infections, revealing how memory effects naturally dampen viral spread over time.

  • Although complete eradication remains out of reach mirroring the persistent nature of real-world cyber threats the inclusion of Kutumba inspired recovery mechanisms lowers the endemic infection level by 23.7% compared to the classical integer-order model and accelerates early antidotal adoption by 1.8 times, demonstrating that familial cohesion can be rigorously modeled as a catalyst for systemic resilience.

  • Simulations consistently show that without deliberate, memory-informed defense strategies deployed from the outset, networks swiftly tip into high-infection regimes highlighting the urgent need to embed digital herd immunity into cybersecurity architecture by design.

This study will investigate variable-order fractal-fractional operators for adaptive threat modelling, hybrid physics-informed neural solvers for scalability, and empirical validation utilising real malware telemetry. The Kutumba-resilience principle is important because it shows how to use trust clusters to defend against attacks in zero-trust architectures, turning social cohesion into a formal way to control cyber space39,40. This sets the stage for predictive cyber public health, which uses maths to help prevent outbreaks from getting worse by containing them before they happen.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to Ongoing Research Funding program, Research Chairs (ORF-RC-2026-0104), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author contributions

R. Aruna Devi: Conceptualization, Investigation, Software, Writing - original draft, Writing - reviews & editing. R. Surendar: Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Supervision S. Sweatha: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal analysis Syed Tauseef Saeed: Software, Validation, Writing - original draft. Abdulrahman A. Almehizia: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration. . Mohamed Aly Saleh: Supervision, Validation, Writing - original draft. Feyisa Edosa Merga: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal analysis.

Funding

This research was funded by King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, through the Ongoing Research Funding program - Research Chairs (ORF-RC-2026-0104).

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Syed Tauseef Saeed, Email: tauseef.saeed@math.uol.edu.pk.

Feyisa Edosa Merga, Email: edosa.feyisa@ju.edu.et.

References

  • 1.Easttom, W. C. II. Computer security fundamentals (Pearson IT Certification, 2023.
  • 2.Singh, H., Srivastava, H. M. & Baleanu, D. Methods of mathematical modelling: infectious diseases (Academic Press, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ahmad, I., Bakar, A. A., Jan, R. & Yussof, S. Dynamic behaviors of a modified computer virus model: Insights into parameters and network attributes. Alex Eng J103, 266–277 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zou, B., Yin, J., Zhang, W. & Long, X. Fractal analysis of limestone damage under successive impact by shield disc cutters. Eng Fract Mech322, 111163 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mohammadzadeh, A. et al. A non-linear fractional-order type-3 fuzzy control for enhanced path-tracking performance of autonomous cars. IET Control Theory Appl18(1), 40–54 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang, W., Li, D. & Chang, X. Analysis and numerical simulation of computer virus propagation model based on limited resources. Math Comput Simul223, 494–508 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hoang, M. T. Dynamics of a fractional-order epidemiological model for computer viruses. São Paulo J Math Sci18(1), 348–369 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Atangana, A. & Akgül, A. Integral transforms and engineering: theory, methods, and applications (CRC Press, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ahmad, I., Bakar, A. A., Jan, R. & Yussof, S. Observer-based adaptive fuzzy fractional backstepping consensus control of uncertain multiagent systems via event-triggered scheme. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst32(7), 3953–3967 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Banerjee, S. & Gowrisankar, A. Fractal signatures in the dynamics of an epidemiology: an analysis of COVID-19 transmission (CRC Press, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sabir, Z. et al. An investigation through stochastic procedures for solving the fractional order computer virus propagation mathematical model with kill signals. Neural Process Lett55(2), 1783–1797 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Al-Jarrah, A., Alquran, M., Freihat, A., Al-Omari, S. & Nonlaopon, K. A fractional-order model for computer viruses and some solution associated with residual power series method. Appl Math Sci Eng31 (1), 2214301 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Janagaraj, R., Jones, G. M. & Selvam, A. Discretization fractional-order seir worm propagation model in computer networks. TWMS J Appl Eng Math 15 (2), 42–352 (2025).
  • 14.Ahmad, J., Ghani, U., Ul Haq, E. & Ul Hassan, Q. M. Mathematical analysis of generalized sir nonlinear epidemic model using an analytical method. Int J Appl Comput Math11(5), 167 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aloui, A. et al. Nonlinear dynamics of discrete-time model for computer virus propagation: Chaos, complexity, stabilization and synchronization. Mathematics13(22), 3681 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen, W. et al. Fractional derivative modeling in mechanics and engineering (Springer, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jin, J. et al. A robust predefined-time convergence zeroing neural network for dynamic matrix inversion. IEEE Trans Cybern53(6), 3887–3900 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Petráš, I. “Fractional-order systems,” in Fractional-order nonlinear systems: modeling, analysis and simulation, 43–54, Springer (2021).
  • 19.Naifar, O. & Makhlouf, A. B. Fractional order systems-control theory and applications (Springer, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu, X., Zhao, L. & Jin, J. A noise-tolerant fuzzy-type zeroing neural network for robust synchronization of chaotic systems. Concurr Comput: Pract Exp36(22), e8218 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xiao, L., Zhao, L. & Jin, J. Preset-time convergence fuzzy zeroing neural network for chaotic system synchronization: FPGA validation and secure communication applications. Sensors25(17), 5394 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Surendar, R. & Muthtamilselvan, M. Nonlinear system synthesis via a quasiperiodic gravity sinusoidal modulation to suppress chaos in ag-mgo/h2o hybrid nanofluid of actuator and sensor array. Arch Appl Mech93 (6), 2585–2611(2023).
  • 23.Jha, S., Roychowdhury, M. K. & Verma, S. Recent developments in fractal geometry and dynamical systems. (2024).
  • 24.Surendar, R., Paramanathan, E. & Varatharaj, K. Predefined-time adaptive robust sliding mode control for hyper-chaos synchronization in fractional-order hybrid system. Int J Dyn Control14(1), 24 (2026). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhong, M., Zhang, J., Zheng, G. & Liu, H. Data-driven model-free adaptive dynamic programming resilient control for nonlinear networked control systems under dos attacks. IEEE Trans Cybern55(12), 5700–5713 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jin, B. & Zhou, Z. Numerical treatment and analysis of time-fractional evolution equations Vol. 214 (Springer, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bouzid, H., Abdelkader, B., Tabharit, L. & Samei, M. E. Existence of solutions to a fractional differential equation involving the caputo q-derivative with boundary conditions in banach spaces. J Inequal Appl2025(1), 56 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prabu, D., Surendar, R. & Santhakumari, R. Impact of chemical interactions and thermal emission on fractional MHD Casson flow through fractional derivatives. ZAMM-J Appl Math Mech106(2), e70346 (2026). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zeb, A., Kumar, P., Djilali, S., Erturk, V. S. & Govindaraj, V. Some novel analyses of the fractional-order covid-19 model using the haar wavelets method. Int J Appl Comput Math11(2), 36 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu, Z., Yang, X. & Yang, L. A fractional computer virus propagation model with saturation effect. Fractal Fract9(9), 587 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alawad, M. A. Lyapunov-based analysis of partial practical stability in tempered fractional calculus. Fractal Fract9(11), 716 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Singh, K. Fixed-point theorems for contractive-type mappings. J Math Anal Appl72(1), 283–290 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Samet, B., Vetro, C. & Vetro, P. Fixed point theorems for --contractive type mappings. Nonlinear Anal: Theory, Methods Appl75(4), 2154–2165 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Granas, A. et al. Fixed point theory Vol. 14 (Springer, 2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Atangana, A. Fractal-fractional differentiation and integration: Connecting fractal calculus and fractional calculus to predict complex system. Chaos, Solitons Fractals102, 396–406 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Avcı, İ. Numerical simulation of fractional delay differential equations using the operational matrix of fractional integration for fractional-order taylor basis. Fractal Fract6(1), 10 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Diethelm, K. & Ford, N. J. Analysis of fractional differential equations. J Math Anal Appl265(2), 229–248 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Handam, A. H. & Freihat, A. A. A new analytic numeric method solution for fractional modified epidemiological model for computer viruses. Appl Appl Math: Int J (AAM)10(2), 19 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lu, Q., Wu, X., She, J., Guo, F. & Yu, L. Disturbance rejection for systems with uncertainties based on fixed-time equivalent-input-disturbance approach. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin11(12), 2384–2395 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Qayyum, M. et al. Fuzzy and fractional analysis of cancer tumor dynamics with depression effects on chemotherapy. Sci Rep15(1), 33185 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data is provided within the manuscript


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES