Skip to main content
Communications Chemistry logoLink to Communications Chemistry
. 2026 Apr 8;9:194. doi: 10.1038/s42004-026-01950-7

Rapid elongation drives the exceptionally fast aggregation of the most common localized human amyloid medin

Vaidehi Roy Chowdhury 1, Robert I Horne 1, Mariana P Cali 1, Zenon Toprakcioglu 1, Sara Linse 2, Michele Vendruscolo 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13237374  PMID: 41951867

Abstract

Amyloid deposition is a hallmark of numerous age-related diseases, and understanding the chemical mechanisms that govern amyloid formation is crucial for advancing the rational development of protein aggregation inhibitors. With amyloid formation rates varying widely across proteins, here we report the quantitative aggregation mechanism of medin, the most common localized amyloid in humans, and find it to be much faster compared to well-known pathological amyloids such as amyloid-β (Aβ), tau and α-synuclein. We report the microscopic rate constants and reaction orders of medin fibril formation by monitoring the aggregation of recombinant human medin in vitro via a fluorescence-based assay, global kinetic modeling, secondary structure analysis and electron microscopy. Medin spontaneously forms amyloid fibrils at physiological pH and temperature in quiescent solution at concentrations as low as 25 nM, with the highest fibril elongation rate constant when compared to those of Aβ, tau and α-synuclein. Our results identify the microscopic basis of the widespread observation of medin aggregates upon aging, offering a mechanistic starting point for drug discovery to inhibit medin aggregation.

Subject terms: Proteins, Biophysical chemistry


Understanding the chemical mechanisms that govern amyloid deposition — a hallmark of numerous age-related diseases — is crucial for advancing the rational development of protein aggregation inhibitors. Here, the authors report the quantitative aggregation mechanism of medin, the most common localized amyloid in humans, and find it to be much faster compared to well-known pathological amyloids such as amyloid-β (Aβ), tau and α-synuclein.

Introduction

Amyloid fibril formation is a crucial process of great functional1–4 and pathological relevance5–7. Elucidating the mechanism of pathological amyloid formation lies at the heart of dissecting the origins of over 50 human diseases5–7 and developing therapeutics to combat aggregation-induced pathogenesis8–10. While considerable progress has been made in understanding the microscopic mechanisms of aggregation of well-known pathological amyloids such as amyloid-β (Aβ)11,12, tau13–15, α-synuclein (αSyn)16–18, prion19,20, and amylin or islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP)21,22, many of the remaining 37 known disease-related amyloids remain relatively unexplored5–7,23.

In this work, we focus on medin, a protein fragment that forms the most common senile localized amyloid in humans, called aortic medial amyloid, found in almost every European above the age of 6024. It deposits with age in the wall of the aorta, the main and the largest artery supplying oxygenated blood directly from the heart to the rest of the human body25,26. Medin is a 50-residue peptide formed by post-translational cleavage of the glycoprotein lactadherin24,27, which is important for apoptotic body removal28,29 as well as Aβ plaque clearance in Alzheimer’s disease (AD)30–33. Medin aggregation is implicated in multiple age-related vascular diseases of the upper body34 (Fig. 1), including giant cell arteritis (the most common arterial inflammatory disease)35, thoracic aortic aneurysm36,37, and aortic dissection37. Medin cross-seeds serum amyloid A aggregation in systemic amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis38. More recently, medin has been shown to coaggregate with and enhance the deposition of cerebrovascular Aβ in both human patients and AD mouse model, causing cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) in AD, while medin deficiency in animal models decreased Aβ deposition by half39–41. Medin aggregates are increased in cerebral arterioles of patients with vascular dementia or AD compared to cognitively healthy controls41. Among cerebrovascular pathologies, arteriolar medin was found to be the best predictor of AD diagnosis independent of plaque load or tau burden40,41. A splice acceptor variant of MFGE8 (the gene encoding lactadherin) lacking residues 268–319 that harbor two of the three key amyloidogenic regions of medin42,43 provides significant protection against coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction in Japanese and several European ethnicities44. Despite extensive disease association, the detailed mechanism of medin aggregation has remained poorly understood over the past 26 years since its discovery24, thereby considerably delaying therapeutic endeavors.

Fig. 1. Amyloid and pre-fibrillar aggregates of medin are implicated in the pathogenesis of several vascular diseases in humans.

Fig. 1

Medin oligomers are found to be the most toxic aggregation intermediate in vitro and are responsible for the pathogenic consequences37. Adapted from refs. 24,35,37,40,41.

To bridge this knowledge gap, we determined the microscopic steps underlying medin aggregation using a chemical kinetics framework45–47. We monitored medin aggregation kinetics across a range of monomer and seed concentrations using thioflavin T (ThT), a fluorescent reporter of amyloid formation, and applied global kinetic modeling46 to extract the microscopic rate constants and reaction orders for fibril nucleation, elongation, and fragmentation processes48–50. We found that medin aggregates with exceptionally high speed at nanomolar concentration in physiological pH and temperature in vitro. It is driven by rapid primary nucleation (reaction order ~1) and elongation (rate constant ~107 s−1) that surpass those of other known pathological amyloids11–16,51, and sustained by saturated secondary processes that proceed independently of monomer concentration (reaction order ~0).

Our results define an extreme kinetic paradigm in pathological protein self-assembly, characterized by rapid nucleation events with weak monomer dependence coupled to fast elongation. These findings provide a quantitative mechanistic rationale for the widespread accumulation of medin aggregates with age. They also introduce a framework for elucidating the influence of extracellular milieu on medin aggregation and establish a platform for screening aggregation inhibitors.

Results

Aggregation of recombinant medin into amyloid fibrils in vitro

Medin was produced recombinantly to >95% purity at a yield of ~3 mg/L of bacterial culture using a protocol52 (see “Methods”) that provides improved peptide integrity and purity compared to previous approaches reported in literature53,54 (Fig. 2A). The previous procedure for recombinant production of medin yielded a peptide integrity of >70%, as determined by western blotting and peptide sequencing by mass spectrometry53. Solid-phase synthesis of medin54 is not recommended for aggregation kinetic studies as chemical synthesis often leaves behind traces of undesired organic solvents, truncated or incorrectly synthesized peptides, and other byproducts, leading to loss of bioactivity55–60. With the recombinant protein production protocol that we developed in this study, no other proteins could be observed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Fig. 2A), the peptide integrity was >95% as measured by intact protein mass spectrometry (Fig. 2B) and >90% as measured by bottom-up proteomics (Supplementary Table 1). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments (Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. 1B) showed that monomeric and initial oligomeric species of medin have hydrodynamic diameters in the range of 0.4–6 nm. After quiescent incubation at pH 7.4 and 37 °C, medin forms aggregates that predominantly increase in hydrodynamic diameter with time, possibly owing to fibril maturation, and fall in the range of 200–3200 nm. Using circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy (Fig. 2D), monomeric medin was found to be predominantly disordered with a highly negative mean residual ellipticity at around 200 nm and a low amplitude (trough) at around 222 nm, corroborating previous reports of its intrinsic disorder61,62. Upon overnight incubation at 37 °C and pH 7.4, medin at 10 µM formed amyloid fibrils with a characteristic β-sheet structure, with a positive signal at 195 nm and a trough at 218 nm. A fibrillar morphology was also confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Fig. 2E).

Fig. 2. Recombinant medin forms amyloid fibrils in vitro under near-physiological conditions (10 µM medin, pH 7.4, 37 °C).

Fig. 2

A Purity measurement by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie blue staining using 2.5 µg of recombinant medin. B Confirmation of medin integrity by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Theoretical molecular weight = 5430.98 Da. C Monitoring change in particle size due to fibrillation of medin by DLS (N = 3, n = 3). D Far-UV CD spectra of monomeric and fibrillar medin at 10 µM monomer-equivalent concentration. Monomeric medin exhibits a highly negative signal at 200 nm and a low amplitude signal at 222 nm, characteristic of disordered proteins and peptides. The CD spectrum of fibrillar medin exhibits a trough at 218 nm, characteristic of a β-sheet. Fibrils were prepared by quiescent overnight incubation at 37 °C, followed by brief and mild sonication. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. MRME = mean residue molar ellipticity. E Transmission electron micrograph of negative-stained fibrils formed by overnight incubation of 10 µM monomeric medin at pH 7.4 at 37 °C under quiescent conditions. Typical amyloid fibrillar morphology was observed. Scale bar = 500 nm.

Saturated secondary pathways sustain medin aggregation in vitro

Amyloid fibril formation is governed broadly by three classes of microscopic processes: (1) nucleation of aggregates, (2) elongation of protofilaments (sometimes preceded by an oligomer conversion step), and (3) fibril maturation11,63. Nucleation processes can either be spontaneous, involving pure monomers only (primary pathways), catalyzed by existing heterotypic surfaces (heterogeneous primary nucleation64,65) or by catalytically active surfaces or ends of pre-formed fibrils (secondary pathways)11,14,22,45,66–71. Secondary pathways can either depend on the monomer concentration (monomer-dependent secondary nucleation11) or the rate could be independent of monomer concentration and instead be limited by the availability of filament ends (as in fibril fragmentation19,71) or rate of detachment of secondary oligomers from fibril surfaces (saturated secondary nucleation12). To determine the relative contributions of each nucleation process in medin amyloidogenesis, we investigated the aggregation process of medin using the fluorescent reporter of amyloid fibril formation, thioflavin T (ThT)72, and performed global kinetic modeling46. ThT binds to medin amyloid fibrils, emitting at 480 nm upon excitation at 440 nm, and increasing its quantum yield in the process. It has a maximum intensity that linearly depends on the initial monomer concentration if the ThT concentration is tailored appropriately (Supplementary Fig. 2). When purely monomeric medin (Supplementary Fig. 1) is incubated at different concentrations at physiological pH and temperature in the presence of ThT, the ThT fluorescence intensity at 480 nm shows a characteristic sigmoidal increase over time (Fig. 3A). We studied the kinetics of aggregation in the lower range (25–625 nM) of the physiological concentration range of medin (0–13.72 µM in the wet aortic tissue of humans above 55 years of age26), where the logarithm of aggregation half-time (t1/2) scaled negatively with that of the initial monomer concentration (m0) (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. 3A, B). This defined the kinetic regime for mechanistic calculations. Notably, no aggregation was noticed in 10 nM medin monomer over 16 h, suggesting that the critical monomer concentration for aggregation lies between 10 nM and 25 nM monomer (Supplementary Fig. 3C, D). Our results generated the scaling exponent γ=−0.5 of the variation of t1/2 with m0 (Fig. 3B), which is characteristic of saturated secondary processes (fragmentation or secondary nucleation), i.e., secondary processes that depend weakly on the initial monomer concentration46. To further confirm the presence of secondary pathways in medin aggregation in vitro, we performed low-seeded aggregation assays, whereby incubation of medin monomer with pre-formed fibrils (seeds) at 1% seed:monomer ratio was found to noticeably decrease the tlag and t1/2 of fibril formation while retaining a sigmoidal profile and similar mechanism of aggregation (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. 4). We note that the quantitative estimates of rate constants and reaction orders are primarily constrained by the well-fitted intermediate concentrations (100–500 nM), whereas the boundary points (50 nM and 625 nM), which show modest deviations from the global model, do not influence the inferred reaction parameters.

Fig. 3. Secondary pathways contribute to medin aggregation under near-physiological conditions in vitro.

Fig. 3

A Recombinant medin monomers were incubated at increasing concentrations between 25 and 625 nM (different colors) at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. Aggregation was monitored using ThT. The inset shows the full time-course of aggregation of medin at 25 and 50 nM concentrations over a period of 8 h. B The half-times (t1/2) of these reactions depend inversely on the square-root of the initial monomer concentrations (m0), which is characteristic of fragmentation or saturated secondary nucleation (γ = −0.5; R2 = 0.93). C Incubation of monomers with pre-formed fibrils (seeds) at a 1% seed:monomer ratio accelerates the rate of aggregation, as shown by the reduced t1/2 values of the seeded reactions (dark green) compared to the unseeded reactions (light green) at the same initial monomer concentrations. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; AU arbitrary unit.

To understand the effect of ionic strength on the solubility and aggregation propensity of medin, amyloid fibril formation was monitored using ThT in the presence of increasing concentrations of NaCl, specifically no salt, hypotonic (40 mM or 0.2%), physiologically normal (150 mM or 0.9%), and hypertonic (500 mM or 3%) solutions (Supplementary Fig. 5A, B). The amplitude of ThT fluorescence intensity is higher in the presence of salt than in the absence thereof (Supplementary Fig. 5C). One possible reason to explain this phenomenon could be that an increase in ionic strength leads to an increased binding of ThT to the amyloid fibrils73. However, the aggregation t1/2 either decreases or does not change in the presence of salt compared to in the absence thereof (Supplementary Fig. 5D and Supplementary Table 2). Importantly, increasing concentrations of salt do not alter the nucleation mechanisms, as evident in the relatively similar scaling exponents of lnt1/2 to lnm0 at all salt concentrations (Supplementary Fig. 5E and Supplementary Table 3). Therefore, increasing concentrations of physiologically relevant salts such as NaCl do not appreciably change the solubility and aggregation propensity of medin.

Determination of microscopic rate constants and reaction orders via kinetic modeling and global data analysis

We next sought to determine the microscopic steps constituting medin aggregate proliferation and growth. We monitored the aggregation kinetics of medin across a range of monomer and seed concentrations and globally fitted the resultant data to a kinetic model of amyloid formation46 (see Supplementary Note 1). According to this model, aggregation in monomeric solutions begins with homogeneous primary nucleation that forms initial aggregates that can then elongate by monomer addition into fibrillar structures. These fibrils, in turn, can catalyze the formation of new aggregates by secondary processes. The overall aggregate proliferation depends on the combined rate constants k+kn, k+k2 and k+k− as well as reaction orders nc and n2. Here, kn, k+, k2 and k− are the rate constants for primary nucleation, elongation, secondary nucleation, and fragmentation, respectively, while nc and n2 are reaction orders for primary and secondary nucleation respectively46.

To calculate the elongation rate constant k+, high-seeded assays were performed by quiescently incubating medin monomers with medin seeds at 20–50% seed:total protein ratio at 37 °C (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Fig. 7). At such high seed:monomer ratios, the reaction is dominated by elongation with negligible nucleation events46,49, thus enabling the determination of k+, which in the case of medin was found to be 5 × 107 M−1 s−1.

Fig. 4. Determination of kinetic parameters of microscopic processes involved in recombinant medin aggregation in vitro.

Fig. 4

A High-seeded assays performed with medin monomers (187.5–500 nM; different colors) in the presence of high amounts of pre-formed fibrils (187.5 nM) exhibit a characteristic exponential-plateau shape of elongation of existing fibril ends. These assays enabled the determination of the elongation rate constant k+ (5 × 107 M−1 s−1) by fitting the normalized data to negligible rate constants and reaction orders for primary and secondary processes. Seed:total protein molar ratios are mentioned in parentheses. B Data from low-seeded assays performed at 1% seed:monomer molar ratio (50–625 nM monomer; different colors) were normalized and fitted separately to secondary nucleation and fragmentation dominated models. The rate constant of the monomer-independent secondary pathway (k2 or k−) was found to be 4 × 10−8 s−1. C Data from unseeded aggregation assays were normalized (different colors denote different initial monomer concentrations) and separately fitted to secondary nucleation and fragmentation dominated spontaneous aggregation kinetic models to show that the primary nucleation step has a first-order dependence on the initial monomer concentration. D Global fitting of aggregation kinetics data obtained under various degrees of seeding in the previous three assays (different colors denote different initial monomer concentrations; circles denote unseeded, diamonds low-seeded, and squares high-seeded reactions) fitted to either a saturated secondary nucleation (n2 = 0) or a fragmentation-dominated model determined the primary nucleation rate constant kn to be 1 × 10−8 s−1. Seed:monomer ratios are indicated in parentheses beside initial monomer concentrations (different colors) in the legend. Symbols denote data points and lines denote fits. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; AU arbitrary unit.

Considering the possibilities of either secondary nucleation or fragmentation dominated proliferation of medin aggregates, low-seeded assays at 1% seed:monomer ratio were performed at different initial monomer concentrations (Fig. 4B). The resulting data were fitted separately by either secondary nucleation or fragmentation-dominated kinetic models, by setting the elongation rate constant to the previously fitted value. According to the kinetic model of aggregation process dominated by fragmentation, the fragmentation rate constant k− was determined to be 4.3 × 10−8 s−1. This is of the same order of magnitude as the fragmentation rate constant of murine prion aggregation initiated with pre-formed fibrillar seeds (k−≥ 1.6 × 10−8 s−1)19. According to a secondary nucleation dominated model, the secondary nucleation rate constant k2 was determined to be 4.4 × 10−8 s−1. The reaction order n2 for secondary nucleation was found to be negligibly small (∼0), which indicates monomer-independent or saturated secondary nucleation.

By fitting the data from the unseeded assay (Fig. 4C) using the pre-determined kinetic parameters and secondary nucleation- or fragmentation-dominated spontaneous aggregation model, the primary nucleation reaction order (nc) was found to be ∼1 (Supplementary Table 4). According to a fragmentation-dominated model of protein aggregation, unseeded reactions of medin had a k+ kn value of 3.3 × 10−1 M−1 s−2. A secondary nucleation dominated model, however, predicted a value of 2.3 × 10−2 M−1 s−2 (Supplementary Table 4).

For the determination of the overall primary nucleation rate constant, we performed a global analysis of data from all the assays in the presence or absence of seed (Fig. 4D) and fitted the data separately to either secondary nucleation or fragmentation models. In all the assays, both the models fit the data equally well, as evident from the relatively similar mean squared error (MSE) values. The primary nucleation rate constant was determined to be kn = 1 × 10−8 s−1, and the corresponding reaction order was determined, nc = ∼1 (Supplementary Table 5). This value suggested a very low nucleation energy barrier. The fitted parameters were further verified by conducting replicate experiments of the unseeded assays using medin produced in different batches, and were found to be consistent across batches (Supplementary Table 6).

Discussion

We reported a quantitative determination of the kinetic mechanism of aggregation of medin, the most common senile localized amyloid in humans. Our results indicate that medin aggregation is dominated by an exceptionally rapid fibril elongation step. First-order primary nucleation and saturated secondary processes, which depend weakly on the initial monomer concentration, account for medin aggregate proliferation, contributing to nucleation at rates of the same order of magnitude (Fig. 5). These results quantify a previous hypothesis of nucleation-dependent growth of amyloid fibrils of medin53 by uncovering the microscopic steps involved in the aggregation process and the corresponding rate parameters. We also reported an improved protocol for consistent production of kinetically conserved batches of recombinant human medin with much higher peptide integrity and purity compared to previous protocols without introducing the possibility of racemization53,54.

Fig. 5. Schematic diagram illustrating a kinetic mechanism of medin aggregation consistent with the in vitro aggregation measurements reported in this work.

Fig. 5

The values of the kinetic parameters obtained for each microscopic step are shown. Primary and saturated secondary processes contribute almost equally to the proliferation of medin aggregates, while exceptionally rapid elongation leads to the fast aggregate growth of medin even at submicromolar concentrations under physiological conditions.

Medin has a higher elongation rate constant than most commonly known amyloids, such as Aβ, α-synuclein, and tau11–16 (Fig. 6A). For most well-studied pathological amyloids, such high elongation rates are only achieved in the presence of cofactors, such as heparin for tau74. The fast aggregation of medin may also be demonstrated by the comparison that ~900 nM Aβ42 aggregates with the same half-time as that of 125 nM medin under the same environmental conditions (Fig. 6B, C, Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Note 2). This pinpoints to the elongation step as a potential target for drug discovery to prevent disease-associated medin aggregation, suggesting the development of inhibitors binding either to the monomers and stabilizing them in their native state, or to fibril ends to prevent further monomer addition.

Fig. 6. Comparison of the elongation rate constant of medin with other human amyloids.

Fig. 6

A Medin (blue) has a higher elongation rate constant (k+) at pH 7.4 and 37 °C compared to the other amyloids, as reported in the literature. Aβ40 (orange) was assayed at the same pH and temperature as medin12. Aβ42 (brown) kinetics were determined in 20 mM sodium phosphate (NaPi) 0.2 mM EDTA 0.02% NaN3 pH 8.0 quiescently at 37 °C11. Wild-type (WT) tau (0N4R isoform; green) was aggregated quiescently in saline-sodium phosphate-ethylene diamine tetraacetate (SSPE) buffer pH 7.4 at 37 °C, and the aggregation kinetics were determined by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy13. α-Synuclein (αSyn; purple) aggregation was monitored in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, quiescently at 37 °C in the presence of pre-formed fibrils16. B It requires almost 10- to 100-fold higher concentration of Aβ42 (brown diamond) to aggregate spontaneously with the same half-time as that of medin (blue circle). C 125 nM medin (blue circle) aggregates with the same t1/2(1.9 h) as 889 nM Aβ42 (brown diamond) at pH 7.4 and 37 °C.

Notably, our results imply a low critical concentration and low nucleation barriers, accounting for the fast aggregate growth even at submicromolar concentrations. The critical concentration of medin aggregation is as low as ~14 nM. These results suggest a fast conversion of monomeric and oligomeric medin into amyloid fibrils with a highly transient existence of free oligomeric intermediates of low population. Further oligomer flux measurement experiments may help verify this hypothesis63. It may also be relevant to investigate in the future if there exist certain concentration sub-regimes within the overall kinetic regime (25–625 nM) where the relative contribution of each microscopic process towards nucleation of new aggregates may differ12.

We found that possible on-pathway intermediates in medin aggregation include both primary (products of homogeneous primary nucleation) and secondary (products of either secondary nucleation or fragmentation) oligomers. This finding is significant because of the likely importance of medin oligomers in mediating toxicity in humans. Medin has been shown to mediate several vascular diseases of the upper body26,34–37,40,41. Recent studies on many amyloidogenic peptides and proteins, including medin35, suggest that the on-pathway intermediates in solution phase are often the main pathogenic species and not the resultant fibrils75. Previously, medin oligomers have also been shown to form pores in lipid bilayers in vitro, suggesting a potential mechanism for destabilizing vascular permeability76. The current study reveals the kinetic mechanisms by which these oligomers are formed—both primary and secondary processes are sources of medin oligomers, and they operate at rates that are of the same order of magnitude. Further areas to investigate are the misfolding patterns of primary vs secondary oligomers63 and whether they exert similar levels of pathological effects on the human tissue. This would, in turn, reveal if it would be more beneficial to therapeutically stabilize the native monomeric state and prevent both toxic oligomer formation and rapid fibril elongation events. Therefore, combining this approach with cell viability assays provides an ideal platform for screening therapies that can inhibit medin aggregation and stabilize medin in a non-toxic state by inhibiting specific microscopic steps. Additionally, the kinetic approach can be used to study how interactions with heterogeneous components of the extracellular milieu modulate medin aggregation, including Aβ isoforms and extracellular chaperones, and therefore shed light on medin amyloid formation in a more physiological context.

In the context of the extracellular environment, salt titration experiments demonstrate the possibility that amyloid fibril formation in medin, which has no net charge at physiological pH (pI = 6.16, with four positively charged and four negatively charged amino acid side chains in the primary structure), is driven mostly by hydrophobic interactions. This is also corroborated by the absence of any charged residues and the abundance of hydrophobic and aromatic residues such as Val, Ile, and Phe, Trp, respectively, in the amyloid-prone regions of medin as reported previously in literature through computational predictions and biophysical characterization43.

In summary, in this study, we presented a quantitative kinetic dissection of medin amyloid formation, mechanistically justifying the prolific deposition of medin in the aging vasculature. By extending the chemical kinetics framework to an understudied but biologically important peptide, we demonstrated how chemical kinetics can be used to uncover quantitative mechanisms in protein self-assembly. We anticipate that our microscopic analysis of medin aggregation will enable a robust platform to investigate cross-seeding interactions with other amyloids, evaluate environmental modulators of aggregation, and design microscopic step-specific pharmacological chaperones, thus contributing broadly to the fields of chemical biology and supramolecular chemistry.

Methods

Recombinant production of medin

The gene sequence coding for NT FlSp domain from Nephila clavipes with the D40K and K65D mutations (NT*FlSp) was obtained by sequencing a pT7 plasmid encoding this gene52, which was a kind gift from Dr. Henrik Biverstål (Karolinska Institutet, Sweden). A 606 bp DNA construct encoding a fusion protein containing, from N- to C-terminus, His6-tag, NT*Flsp, TEV protease recognition site, and human medin, was cloned into a pET-28a(+) plasmid between NcoI restriction site at the 5′ end and XhoI site at the 3′ end by GenScript Biotech, United Kingdom (plasmid deposition to Addgene underway; ID 251408). Protein production and purification were carried out as described previously for Aβ isoforms52. Briefly, the plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells (New England Biolabs, United Kingdom). Overnight-grown liquid cultures of the transformed cells were inoculated at 1:100 dilution in Luria Bertani (LB) medium containing 70 µg/mL kanamycin and grown at 30 °C and 120 rpm (Infors HT, United Kingdom) until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600 nm) reached 0.8–0.9. The cultures were cooled down to 20 °C and gene expression was induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), followed by overnight incubation. Cells were isolated by centrifugation at 5000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, resuspended in 20 mL of 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 per litre of culture, re-centrifuged at ~4700 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, and stored at −20 °C. To check for protein expression, an aliquot of cells was collected before and after induction, centrifuged, washed, and re-centrifuged, followed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of the final pellets to detect the presence of a band corresponding to the fusion protein only in the induced cells.

The frozen cells were thawed on ice, resuspended in 40 mL of 20 mM Tris-HCl 8 M urea pH 8.0 per litre of culture supplemented with EDTA-free protease inhibitors (Roche, Germany), and sonicated to obtain a clear lysate. Precipitated materials were sedimented by centrifugation at 53,343 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 µm PES membrane under vacuum and loaded onto two 5 mL HisTrap Excel columns (Cytiva, Sweden) connected in series and pre-equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl 8 M urea 15 mM imidazole pH 8.0. For 4 L or more culture volumes, four such columns were daisy-chained. The fusion protein was eluted with 300 mM imidazole buffer, dialyzed into 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, and cleaved with TEV protease (GenScript Biotech, United Kingdom). The reaction mixture was lyophilized and re-dissolved in 6 M guanidium chloride (GdmCl) before loading onto a Superdex 75 pg 16/600 size-exclusion column (Cytiva, Sweden) at 1 mL/min flow rate. Monomeric medin peptide was eluted in 20 mM sodium phosphate (NaPi) 0.2 mM EDTA pH 8.0, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, lyophilized, and stored at −80 °C until further use. Peptide purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE. Peptide integrity was confirmed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Peptide sequencing was performed on gel-eluted protein bands by the Cambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge.

Size exclusion chromatography (SEC)

Lyophilized medin was resuspended in 6 M GdmCl and subjected to size exclusion chromatography using a SuperdexTM 75 Increase 10/300 GL column (Cytiva, Sweden) at 0.5 mL/min flow rate. Purely monomeric medin was eluted in aggregation assay buffer, i.e., 20 mM NaPi 0.2 mM EDTA pH 7.4, at a retention volume of 14.5 mL (Supplementary Fig. 1A).

Dynamic light scattering (DLS)

10 µM medin monomer was either directly subjected to DLS or incubated in a 96-well plate with a non-binding surface (Corning 3881, United Kingdom) at 100 µL per well at 37 °C in quiescent conditions. Samples were withdrawn at different time intervals, and the particle size distribution was monitored at 20 °C in a Malvern Zetasizer Nano instrument (Malvern Instruments Limited, United Kingdom) at 70 µL volume (N = 3, n = 3). Two outliers were removed manually before data analysis.

Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy

Far-UV CD spectra of each of 10 µM medin monomer and sonicated fibrils (grown in the absence of ThT; see “Aggregation assays and preparation of seeds” for preparation of sonicated fibrils) were acquired in a Chirascan spectrophotometer (Applied Photophysics, United Kingdom) over the wavelength range of 190–250 nm and in seven repeats, which were averaged and blank-corrected. Mean residue molar ellipticity (MRME) was calculated in degcm2dmol−1res−1 using the following formula:

MRME=θ×Mn×10×l×c 1

where θ is the ellipticity in mdeg, M is the average molecular weight of monomer in g mol-1, n is the number of residues of a monomer in res unit, l is the path length of the cell in cm, and c the monomer-equivalent concentration in g L-1.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

2.5 µL of 10 µM overnight-grown medin fibrils aggregated in the absence of ThT was spotted and dried for 40 s on a lacey carbon film-coated 3 mm 300-mesh copper grid, followed by washing with 2.5 µL of ultrapure water for 40 s, and then stained with 2.5 µL 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 40 s. Micrographs were acquired using an FEI Talos F200X G2 TEM instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United Kingdom). Fibril diameter was calculated by averaging the diameters of 100 fibrils on ImageJ77 using the TIA Reader plugin.

Aggregation assays and preparation of seeds

All assays were carried out at 37 °C in quiescent conditions at 100 µL sample volume per well in 96-well half-area non-binding plates (Corning 3881), with an aluminum film coating to minimize evaporation. Medin monomer was incubated at different concentrations with or without pre-formed fibrils (seeds), in the presence of 20 µM ThT, with five replicates per sample. ThT fluorescence emission at 480 nm, when excited at 440 nm, was monitored using a FLUOstar Omega plate-reader (BMG Labtech GmbH, Germany) using a cycle time of 180 s with 40 flashes per reading and 0.2 s settling time per cycle. The unseeded reactions were repeated thrice using three different batches of protein.

For the preparation of seeds, 10 µM of medin monomer was incubated overnight at 37 °C in quiescent conditions without ThT at 100 µL per well in the same plates. Amyloid aggregation was monitored using 20 µM ThT in replicate wells. The overnight-grown fibrils were sonicated for 15 s at 50% duty cycle and 10% power using a microtip sonicator (Bandelin Sonopuls, Germany) to produce seeds for subsequent seeded aggregation assays.

For salt titration experiments, 20 mM NaPi 1 M NaCl 0.2 mM EDTA pH 7.4 was diluted to the final reaction mixtures at final NaCl concentrations of 0, 40, 150, and 500 mM before incubation in replicate wells of a non-binding plate and monitoring of aggregation kinetics as described above.

Kinetic analysis

After removing outliers manually, the resultant data from kinetic assays were normalized and analyzed using the online platform AmyloFit 2.046 made for global aggregation kinetic data-fitting. All data representations have been produced in GraphPad Prism 2.0. Half-times of unseeded aggregation assays were calculated in the AmyloFit 2.0 platform. For comparison of aggregation half-times of unseeded and low-seeded reactions, data were normalized and fitted using GraphPad Prism 2.0 with

y=ymin+ymax−ymin1+t1/2tc 2

where y is the normalized ThT fluorescence and c is a constant. All data were fitted with the corresponding model using 50 basin hops to ensure convergence, and the fit with the least MSE was considered the best fit. Two models were used with the consideration of the presence or absence of seeds: secondary nucleation dominated11 and fragmentation dominated mechanisms45. The depolymerization rate constant koff was set constant to a negligible minimum of 2.8 × 10−19 s−1 while fitting data to fragmentation-based models46. The average fibril length for pre-formed aggregate seeds was assumed to be 10,000 monomers46. High-seeded aggregation assays, where the seed:total protein ratio ranged between 23 and 33%, showed a biphasic behavior upon prolonged incubation, which may be attributed to higher-order fibril maturation events that do not form a part of the in vitro aggregation kinetic analysis (Supplementary Fig. 6). Hence, the elongation rate constant k+ was calculated from the first phase.

To determine the critical concentration of medin aggregation, we first determined the ThT amplitude of sigmoidal curves of spontaneous aggregation of medin at 0 (blank), 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 75, 100, 250, 375, 500 and 625 nM in the presence of 20 µM ThT using the same conditions as described in the subsection “Aggregation assays and preparation of seeds.” The ThT fluorescence intensity of the blank profile was subtracted from the rest before data fitting. Since no sigmoidal curve could be fit for the kinetic profiles at 0, 5, and 10 nM medin, the ThT amplitude in these cases were considered 0 AU (arbitrary unit). The ThT amplitude keeps increasing from 15 nM onwards; however, a two-state sigmoidal response curve similar to equation (2) could be fit considering concentrations 0–40 nM. The half-maximal point of this fit was considered to be the critical concentration of aggregation for pure monomeric medin under the given experimental conditions.

Aβ42 aggregation assays

Human Aβ42 was recombinantly produced and purified as described previously52 followed by aliquoting, lyophilization, and storage at −80 °C. An aliquot of lyophilized Aβ42 was resuspended in 6 M GdmCl on ice and subjected to size exclusion chromatography on a SuperdexTM 75 Increase 10/300 GL column (Cytiva, Sweden) at 0.5 mL/min flow rate. Pure monomeric Aβ42 was eluted in aggregation assay buffer. It was incubated at different concentrations in the presence of 20 μM ThT quiescently at 37 °C in 96-well half-area non-binding plates (Corning 3881), with 100 μL per well and five replicate wells per concentration. An aluminum film coating minimized evaporation. The fluorescence emission of ThT at 480 nm upon excitation at 440 nm was monitored using a FLUOstar Omega plate-reader (BMG Labtech GmbH, Germany) using a cycle time of 300 s with 40 flashes per reading and 0.2 s settling time per cycle. Kinetic data were normalized and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 2.0 as described above to determine the scaling exponent γ, which was found to be equal to −1.2 as expected11 (Supplementary Fig. 8B).

Annotation convention

N denotes biological replicates (measurements taken from distinct samples in distinct experiments with the same set of variables). n denotes technical replicates (measurements taken from the same sample split into different wells of the same plate, 100 µL per well, in the same experiment). SEM stands for standard error of mean. SD stands for standard deviation.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplemental Material (1.7MB, pdf)
42004_2026_1950_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (38.5KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data (1.9MB, xlsx)
Reporting summary (1.7MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

V.R.C. acknowledges Bio2Brain MSC-ITN (EU Horizon 2020 Grant Agreement no. 956977) for funding this research. The authors acknowledge the EPSRC Underpinning Multi-User Equipment Call (EP/P030467/1) for funding of the Talos F200X G2 TEM instrument in the electron microscopy facility at the Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge. The authors would like to thank Dr. Rebecca C. Gregory and Carola Grondona for support in the Aβ42 production and Dr. Heather Greer for training on the TEM. Parts of the figures were created with BioRender.com.

Author contributions

V.R.C. performed protein purification with support from M.P.C. V.R.C., R.I.H., and Z.T. performed aggregation kinetics assays and data analysis. V.R.C., R.I.H., S.L., and M.V. designed the project. V.R.C. and M.V. wrote the manuscript with input from all the coauthors.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Chemistry thanks Jill Madine, Jan Bieschke and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

All data pertaining to the manuscript (Main and Supplementary Information) have been provided in the Supplementary Data file.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42004-026-01950-7.

References

  • 1.Otzen, D. & Riek, R. Functional amyloids. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.11, a033860 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Knowles, T. P. J. & Mezzenga, R. Amyloid fibrils as building blocks for natural and artificial functional materials. Adv. Mat.28, 6546–6561 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Wei, G. et al. Self-assembling peptide and protein amyloids: from structure to tailored function in nanotechnology. Chem. Soc. Rev.46, 4661–4708 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Wittung-Stafshede, P. Chemical catalysis by biological amyloids. Biochem. Soc. Trans.51, 1967–1974 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Chiti, F. & Dobson, C. M. Protein misfolding, amyloid formation, and human disease: a summary of progress over the last decade. Annu. Rev. Biochem.86, 27–68 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Knowles, T. P. J., Vendruscolo, M. & Dobson, C. M. The amyloid state and its association with protein misfolding diseases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.15, 384–396 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Eisenberg, D. & Jucker, M. The amyloid state of proteins in human diseases. Cell148, 1188–1203 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Vendruscolo, M. Thermodynamic and kinetic approaches for drug discovery to target protein misfolding and aggregation. Exp. Opin. Drug Discov.18, 881–891 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Selkoe, D. J. & Hardy, J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol. Med.8, 595–608 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Linse, S. et al. Kinetic fingerprints differentiate the mechanisms of action of anti-Aβ antibodies. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.27, 1125–1133 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cohen, S. I. A. et al. Proliferation of amyloid-β42 aggregates occurs through a secondary nucleation mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA110, 9758–9763 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meisl, G. et al. Differences in nucleation behavior underlie the contrasting aggregation kinetics of the Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA111, 9384–9389 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kundel, F. et al. Measurement of tau filament fragmentation provides insights into prion-like spreading. ACS Chem. Neurosci.9, 1276–1282 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rodriguez Camargo, D. C. et al. Proliferation of Tau 304-380 fragment aggregates through autocatalytic secondary nucleation. ACS Chem. Neurosci.12, 4406–4415 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shammas, S. L. et al. A mechanistic model of tau amyloid aggregation based on direct observation of oligomers. Nat. Commun.6, 7025 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Buell, A. K. et al. Solution conditions determine the relative importance of nucleation and growth processes in α-synuclein aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA111, 7671–7676 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Flagmeier, P. et al. Mutations associated with familial Parkinson’s disease alter the initiation and amplification steps of α-synuclein aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA113, 10328–10333 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Horne, R. I. et al. Discovery of potent inhibitors of α-synuclein aggregation using structure-based iterative learning. Nat. Chem. Biol.20, 634–645 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sang, J. C. et al. Direct observation of murine prion protein replication in vitro. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 14789–14798 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meisl, G. et al. Scaling analysis reveals the mechanism and rates of prion replication in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.28, 365–372 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xu, Y. et al. Tuning the rate of aggregation of hIAPP into amyloid using small-molecule modulators of assembly. Nat. Commun.13, 1040 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Rodriguez Camargo, D. C. et al. Surface-catalyzed secondary nucleation dominates the generation of toxic IAPP aggregates. Front. Mol. Biosci.8, 757425 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Buxbaum, J. N. et al. Amyloid nomenclature 2024: update, novel proteins, and recommendations by the International Society of Amyloidosis (ISA) Nomenclature Committee. Amyloid31, 249–256 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Häggqvist, B. et al. Medin: an integral fragment of aortic smooth muscle cell-produced lactadherin forms the most common human amyloid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96, 8669–8674 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Abdellatif, M., Rainer, P. P., Sedej, S. & Kroemer, G. Hallmarks of cardiovascular ageing. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 20, 754–777 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26.Migrino, R. Q. et al. Amyloidogenic medin induces endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation through the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts. Cardiovasc. Res.113, 1389–1402 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Raymond, A., Ensslin, M. A. & Shur, B. D. SED1/MFG-E8: a Bi-motif protein that orchestrates diverse cellular interactions. J. Cell Biochem.106, 957–966 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shi, J., Heegaard, C. W., Rasmussen, J. T. & Gilbert, G. E. Lactadherin binds selectively to membranes containing phosphatidyl-L-serine and increased curvature. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr.1667, 82–90 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Elliott, M. R. & Ravichandran, K. S. Clearance of apoptotic cells: Implications in health and disease. J. Cell Biol.189, 1059–1070 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Boddaert, J. et al. Evidence of a role for lactadherin in Alzheimer’s disease. Am. J. Pathol.170, 921–929 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Marazuela, P. et al. MFG-E8 (LACTADHERIN): a novel marker associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Acta Neuropathol. Commun.9, 154 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Tajbakhsh, A. et al. Apoptotic neurons and amyloid-beta clearance by phagocytosis in Alzheimer’s disease: pathological mechanisms and therapeutic outlooks. Eur. J. Pharmacol.895, 173873 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 33.Kawabe, K., Takano, K., Moriyama, M. & Nakamura, Y. Microglia endocytose amyloid β through the binding of transglutaminase 2 and milk fat globule EGF factor 8 protein. Neurochem. Res.43, 32–40 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Peng, S., Glennert, J. & Westermark, P. Medin-amyloid: a recently characterized age-associated arterial amyloid form affects mainly arteries in the upper part of the body. Amyloid12, 96–102 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Peng, S. et al. Medin and medin-amyloid in ageing inflamed and non-inflamed temporal arteries. J. Pathol.196, 91–96 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Davies, H. A. et al. Idiopathic degenerative thoracic aneurysms are associated with increased aortic medial amyloid. Amyloid26, 148–155 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Peng, S. et al. Role of aggregated medin in the pathogenesis of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Lab. Investig.87, 1195–1205 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Larsson, A., Malmström, S. & Westermark, P. Signs of cross-seeding: aortic medin amyloid as a trigger for protein AA deposition. Amyloid18, 229–234 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Degenhardt, K. et al. Medin aggregation causes cerebrovascular dysfunction in aging wild-type mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA117, 23925–23931 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wagner, J. et al. Medin co-aggregates with vascular amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature612, 123–131 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Migrino, R. Q. et al. Cerebrovascular medin is associated with Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Alzheimer’s Dement.12, e12072 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Reches, M. & Gazit, E. Amyloidogenic hexapeptide fragment of medin: Homology to functional islet amyloid polypeptide fragments. Amyloid. 11, 81–89 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Larsson, A. et al. Unwinding fibril formation of medin, the peptide of the most common form of human amyloid. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.361, 822–828 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ruotsalainen, S. E. et al. Inframe insertion and splice site variants in MFGE8 associate with protection against coronary atherosclerosis. Commun. Biol.5, 802 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Knowles, T. P. J. et al. An analytical solution to the kinetics of breakable filament assembly. Science326, 1533–1537 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Meisl, G. et al. Molecular mechanisms of protein aggregation from global fitting of kinetic models. Nat. Protoc.11, 252–272 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Michaels, T. C. T. et al. Amyloid formation as a protein phase transition. Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 379–397 (2023).
  • 48.Cohen, S. I. A., Vendruscolo, M., Dobson, C. M. & Knowles, T. P. J. Nucleated polymerization with secondary pathways. II. Determination of self-consistent solutions to growth processes described by non-linear master equations. J. Chem. Phys.135, 065106 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Cohen, S. I. A., Vendruscolo, M., Dobson, C. M. & Knowles, T. P. J. From macroscopic measurements to microscopic mechanisms of protein aggregation. J. Mol. Biol.421, 160–171 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 50.Cohen, S. I. A. et al. Nucleated polymerization with secondary pathways. I. Time evolution of the principal moments. J. Chem. Phy.135, 065105 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 51.Horne, R. I. et al. Secondary processes dominate the quiescent, spontaneous aggregation of α-synuclein at physiological ph with sodium salts. ACS Chem. Neurosci.14, 3125–3131 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Abelein, A. et al. High-yield production of amyloid-β peptide enabled by a customized spider silk domain. Sci. Rep.10, 235 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Davies, H. A., Wilkinson, M. C., Gibson, R. P. & Middleton, D. A. Expression and purification of the aortic amyloid polypeptide medin. Protein Expr. Purif.98, 32–37 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.De Vleeschouwer, M., Pradhan, B., Rousseau, F. & Schymkowitz, J. Chemical synthesis of medin via a removable aggregation-suppressing linker. J. Pept. Sci.31, e70041 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 55.Behrendt, R., White, P. & Offer, J. Advances in Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis. J. Pept. Sci.22, 4–27 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Somehsaraie, M. H. A., Vavsari, V. F., Kamangar, M. & Balalaie, S. Chemical wastes in the peptide synthesis process and ways to reduce them. Iran. J. Pharm. Res.21, e123879 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 57.Riester, D., Wiesmu, K.-H., Stoll, D. & Kuhn, R. High performance liquid chromatography in protein and peptide chemistry. Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun.85, 2361–2365 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shobo, A., Röntgen, A., Hancock, M. A. & Multhaup, G. Biophysical characterization as a tool to predict amyloidogenic and toxic properties of amyloid-β42 peptides. FEBS Lett.596, 1401–1411 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Raskatov, J. A., Foley, A. R., Louis, J. M., Yau, W. M. & Tycko, R. Constraints on the structure of fibrils formed by a racemic mixture of amyloid-β peptides from solid-state NMR, electron microscopy, and theory. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 13299–13313 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang, J. et al. Mechanistic study of diketopiperazine formation during solid-phase peptide synthesis of tirzepatide. ACS Omega7, 46809–46824 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Davies, H. A., Phelan, M. M. & Madine, J. 1H, 15N and 13C assignment of the amyloidogenic protein medin using fast-pulsing NMR techniques. Biomol. NMR Assign.10, 75–77 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Davies, H. A., Rigden, D. J., Phelan, M. M. & Madine, J. Probing medin monomer structure and its amyloid nucleation using 13 C-direct detection NMR in combination with structural bioinformatics. Sci Rep 7, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Michaels, T. C. T. et al. Dynamics of oligomer populations formed during the aggregation of Alzheimer’s Aβ42 peptide. Nat. Chem.12, 445–451 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Baumann, K. N. et al. A kinetic Map of the influence of biomimetic lipid model membranes on Aβ42 aggregation. ACS Chem. Neurosci.14, 323–329 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Man, W. K. et al. A role of cholesterol in modulating the binding of α-synuclein to synaptic-like vesicles. Front. Neurosci.14, 18 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 66.Staats, R., Brotzakis, Z. F., Chia, S., Horne, R. I. & Vendruscolo, M. Optimization of a small molecule inhibitor of secondary nucleation in α-synuclein aggregation. Front. Mol. Biosci.10, 1155753 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Thacker, D. I., Barghouth, M. I., Bless, M., Zhang, E. & Linse, S. Direct observation of secondary nucleation along the fibril surface of the amyloid β 42 peptide. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.120, e2220664120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 68.Zimmermann, M. R. et al. Mechanism of secondary nucleation at the single fibril level from direct observations of Aβ42 aggregation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 16621–16629 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gaspar, R. et al. Secondary nucleation of monomers on fibril surface dominates α-synuclein aggregation and provides autocatalytic amyloid amplification. Q Rev. Biophys.50, e6 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 70.Xue, W.-F., Hellewell, A. L., Hewitt, E. W. & Radford, S. E. Fibril fragmentation in amyloid assembly and cytotoxicity. Prion4, 20–25 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sun, Y. et al. Direct observation of competing prion protein fibril populations with distinct structures and kinetics. ACS Nano17, 6575–6588 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Xue, C., Lin, T. Y., Chang, D. & Guo, Z. Thioflavin T as an amyloid dye: fibril quantification, optimal concentration and effect on aggregation. R Soc. Open Sci.4, 160696 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 73.Mikalauskaite, K., Ziaunys, M., Sneideris, T. & Smirnovas, V. Effect of ionic strength on thioflavin-t affinity to amyloid fibrils and its fluorescence intensity. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 1–13 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Townsend, D., Fullwood, N. J., Yates, E. A. & Middleton, D. A. Aggregation kinetics and filament structure of a tau fragment are influenced by the sulfation pattern of the cofactor heparin. Biochemistry59, 4003–4014 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Haass, C. & Selkoe, D. J. Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer’s amyloid β-peptide. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.8, 101–112 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 76.Younger, S. et al. Medin oligomer membrane pore formation: a potential mechanism of vascular dysfunction. Biophys. J.118, 2769–2782 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 671–675 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material (1.7MB, pdf)
42004_2026_1950_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (38.5KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data (1.9MB, xlsx)
Reporting summary (1.7MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data pertaining to the manuscript (Main and Supplementary Information) have been provided in the Supplementary Data file.


Articles from Communications Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES