Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Stem Cell Res. 2026 Mar 3;92:103949. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2026.103949

Generation and characterization of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines from patients affected with Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff disease

Vukasin M Jovanovic a, Catherine Z Chen a, Camilo Toro b, Kerstin A Hurd c, Jizhong Zou c, Cynthia J Tifft b, Wei Zheng a, Mark J Henderson a, Juan Marugan a, Carlos A Tristan a,*
PMCID: PMC13237807  NIHMSID: NIHMS2156212  PMID: 41795546

Abstract

Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases, are sphingolipidoses caused by rare genetic mutations in the HEXA and HEXB genes, that encode the alpha and beta subunits of lysosomal hexosaminidase, respectively. Here, we report the generation and characterization of three Tay-Sachs and one Sandhoff iPSC lines derived from patients with late-onset disease carrying mutations at the HEXA or HEXB gene. The Tay-Sachs patients carried either homozygous or complex heterozygous mutations in the HEXA gene. The Sandhoff patient carried a heterozygous mutation in the HEXB gene. These four iPSC lines will serve as a valuable resource for the development of in vitro lysosomal storage disease models and therapeutic drug development.

1. Resource Table

Unique stem cell line identifier NCATSi001-A, NCATSi002-A, NCATSi003-A, NCATSi004-A
Alternative name(s) of stem cell line HT1185A (c.805G > A/c.805G > A), HT1186A (c.533G > A/c.805G > A), HT1187B (c.805G > A/c.1073G > A), HT1188B (c.522 T > G/unknown)
Institution National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
Contact information of the distributor Carlos Tristan carlos.tristan@nih.gov
Type of cell line iPSC
Origin Human
Additional human source info requiredfor human ESC or iPSC Age: UnknownSex: HT1185A (male), HT1186A (female), HT1187B (male), HT1188B (male)Ethnicity: Unknown
Cell Source Fibroblast
Clonality Clonal
Method of reprogramming Sendai virus
Genetic Feature(s) HT1185A; HEXA (c.805G > A)/(c.805G > A)HT1186A; HEXA (c.533G > A/c.805G > A)HT1187B; HEXA (c.805G > A/c.1073G > A)HT1188B; HEXB (c.522 T > G/unknown)
Evidence of the reprogramming transgene loss (including genomic copy if applicable) RT-PCR
Associated disease Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff Disease
Gene/locus HEXA and HEXB
Date archived/stock date 10/9/24
Cell line repository/bank N/A
Ethical approval Tissue samples in this study were from patients enrolled in an NIH protocol, “Natural History of Glycosphingolipid Storage Disorders and Glycoprotein Disorders” (IRB 09-HG-0107, NCT00029965), approved by the National Human Genome Research Institute IRB.

2. Resource Utility

Four iPSC lines were created from Tay-Sachs or Sandhoff patients carrying HEXA or HEXB mutations. These lines differentiate into all three germ layers, providing a resource for generating disease relevant cell types and enabling therapeutic development and in vitro studies of sphingolipidoses.

3. Resource details

Sphingolipidoses are a group of rare, inherited lysosomal storage disorders caused by defects in enzymes involved in sphingolipid metabolism. These enzymatic deficiencies lead to accumulation of sphingolipids within lysosomes. In general, these disorders have a collective frequency of 1 in 8,000 individuals (Schultz et al., 2011). Among them, Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases result from deficiencies in the heterodimeric enzyme β–hexosaminidase A resulting from mutations in the HEXA gene (Tay-Sachs disease) or HEXB (Sandhoff diseases), respectively (Toro, et al., 1999). The failure to break down GM2 leads to its progressive accumulation in neuronal lysosomes, causing neuropathology and neurodegeneration. The prognosis for individuals affected with Tay-Sachs or Sandhoff disease is poor, as there is currently no treatment to cure or slow the progression of these diseases (Picache et al., 2022). Therefore, the development of cellular models for these diseases is critically needed to enable the drug discovery and therapeutic development.

To this end, fibroblasts from three individuals affected with late-onset Tay-Sachs disease and one individual with late-onset Sandhoff disease were obtained from anterior forearm skin biopsies and cultured in MEF medium. The Tay-Sachs patients carried the following HEXA gene mutations: homozygous c.805G > A (G269S)/c.805G > A (G269S), complex heterozygous c.533G > A (R178H)/c.805G > A (G269S), or complex heterozygous c.805G > A (G269S)/c.1073 + 1G > A (IVS9 + 1G > A). The Sandhoff patient-derived line carried a heterozygous c.552 T > G (Y184X)/unknown mutation in the HEXB gene.

Fibroblasts were reprogrammed using the CytoTune iPS 2.0 Sendai Reprogramming Kit (Invitrogen) that contains three vectors encoding the transcription factors, Klf-4, OCT3/4, Sox2, and c-Myc. Following successful reprogramming, single-cell clonal iPSC lines were generated and expanded for three passages on Matrigel-coated plates in StemFlex medium. At passage three, iPSC lines were transferred onto vitronectin-coated plates and cultured for an additional 7–10 passages in E8 Medium.

To improve cell viability and recovery, the CEPT cocktail was used at each passage and at cryopreservation (Chen et al., 2021). All four cell lines displayed typical undifferentiated stem cell morphology and markers of undifferentiated hPSCs, NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2 (Fig. 1A and Table 1). Quantitative RT-PCR was used to confirm the expression of NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2 transcripts in all four cell lines at passage 10–11 (Supplementary Fig. 1A and Table 2). Sanger sequencing was performed for each cell line to verify mutations at the HEXA or HEXB genes (Fig. 1B). Sendai virus clearance was assessed for all iPSC lines at passages 10–13, in comparison to positive control HT1186A at passage 3 post transduction (Supplementary Fig. 1B). To evaluate differentiation potential, all cell lines were differentiated into ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm, and differentiation was evaluated by Western blot and immunocytochemistry (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Induced pluripotent stem cell lines generated from patients with either Tay-Sachs or Sandhoff disease. (A) Tay-Sachs disease patient derived cell lines (HT1185A, HT1186A, HT1187B) or Sandhoff cell lines (HT1188B) display typical iPSC morphology and express self-renewal markers NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2. Scale bar is 75 μm. (B) Sanger sequencing of HEXA and HEXB mutations in iPSC lines HT1185A, HT1186A, HT1187B, and HT1188B, blue highlight indicates mutation (C) Western blot of cells differentiated into ectoderm (PAX6), mesoderm (Brachyury) and endoderm (SOX17).

Table 1.

Classification Test Result Data
Morphology Microscopy Bright field Normal Fig. 1 panel A
Phenotype Qualitative analysis (Immunocytochemistry) OCT4, NANOG, SOX2 Fig. 1 panel A
Quantitative analysis (RT-qPCR) Oct4, Nanog, Sox2 gene expression Supplementary Fig. 1 panel A
Genotype Karyotype (CGH array) and resolution 46, XY; 46, XX; 46, XY; 46, XY Resolution: 50–100 kb Supplemental
mtDNA analysis (IF APPLICABLE) N/A N/A
Identity Performed
STR analysis 24 sites tested; matched Submitted to the journal archive
Mutation analysis (IF APPLICABLE) Sequencing (Sanger) Homozygous and Heterozygous Fig. 1 panel B
Southern Blot OR WGS N/A
Microbiology and virology Mycoplasma Mycoplasma testing by luminescence. Negative Supplemental
Differentiation potential Directed differentiation Ectoderm (PAX6), mesoderm (Brachyury), endoderm (SOX17 Fig. 1 panel C Supplementary Fig. 1 panel C
Donor screening (OPTIONAL) HIV 1 + 2 Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C N/A N/A
Genotype additional info (OPTIONAL) Blood group genotyping N/A N/A
Genotype additional info (OPTIONAL) HLA tissue typing N/A N/A

Table 2.

Reagents details.

Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry/flow-cytometry
Antibody Dilution Company Cat # RRID
Markers of undifferentiated hPSCs Mouse anti-OCT4 IF;1:100 Santa Cruz Cat# SC5279 AB_628051
Goat anti-SOX2 IF;1:100 R&D Cat# AF2018 AB_355110
Rabbit anti-NANOG IF;1:200 Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 4903 AB_10559205
WB; all 1:50
Differentiation Markers Rabbit anti-PAX6 IF; 1:100 IF; 1:100 Biolegend Cat# 901,302 AB_2749901
Rabbit anti-Brachyury IF;1:1000 Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 81,694 AB_2799983
Rabbit anti-SOX17 WB; all 1:50 Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 81,778 AB_2650582
House-keeping Markers Alpha tubulin WB;1:200 Abcam Cat# ab7291 AB_2241126
Secondary antibodies Donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor IF; 1:1000 Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A10037, A32849, AB_11180865
568 WB; No dilution A21206 AB_2762840
Donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 647 ProteinSimple Cat# 042-206, 042-205, 043-522-2 AB_2535792
Donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488
Anti-Rabbit Secondary HRP
Anti-Mouse Secondary HRP
Anti-Goat Secondary HRP
Primers
Target Size of band Forward/Reverse primer (5–3)
Markers of undifferentiated hPSCs (RT-qPCR) Nanog N/A IDT Assay ID: Hs.PT.58.21480849
OCT4 N/A IDT Assay ID: Hs.PT.58.14648152.g
SOX2 N/A IDT Assay ID: Hs.PT.58.237897.g
House-Keeping Genes (RT-qPCR) GAPDH N/A IDT Assay ID: Hs.PT.39a.22214836
ACTB N/A IDT Assay ID: Hs.PT.39a.22214847
Sendai virus detection (PCR) SeV 181 bp GGATCACTAGGTGATATCGAGC/ACCAGACAAGAGTTTAAGAGATATGTATC
KOS 528 bp ATGCACCGCTACGACGTGAGCGC/ACCTTGACAATCCTGATGTGG
Klf4 410 bp TTCCTGCATGCCAGAGGAGCCC/AATGTATCGAAGGTGCTCAA
c-Myc 523 bp TAACTGACTAGCAGGCTTGTCG/TCCACATACAGTCCTGGATGATGATG
House-Keeping Gene (PCR) GAPDH 197 bp GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT/GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG
Genotyping Primers (PCR) 0c.805G > A (G269S) 477 bp GTAAAACGACGGCCAGTTTGAAGATAGTCCCTGACACC/GGAAACAGCTATGACCATGTCCATTGTCCAAAGTGAGTTCT
0c.533G > A (R178H) 381 bp GTAAAACGACGGCCAGTCCCTGAGAACAGTCACAGATTG/GGAAACAGCTATGACCATGCCACACCCAGTCCATACATTC
c.1073 + 1G > A (IVS9 + 1G > A) 489 bp GTAAAACGACGGCCAGTGGCTTCTGAGATCCTTGCTTAT/GGAAACAGCTATGACCATGCTGTTTGTGCCAGTGCTCTA
c.552 T > G (Y184X) 282 bp GTAAAACGACGGCCAGTGAACTCCATCTTGAGTTGCTTTAAT/GGAAACAGCTATGACCATGGCTTGTCTCACAAGAAAGATGC

High-resolution karyotyping of each iPSC line showed a normal human diploid karyotype, with few detectable variants as summarized (Supplementary Table s3). STR profiling was performed for each iPSC line using the GenePrint 24 System (Promega) (submitted to the journal archive). Mycoplasma testing was conducted at passage 3 and 11 using the MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit and all cell lines were free of contamination (Supplementary).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell culture and reprogramming

Patient derived fibroblasts were cultured in DMEM medium (Thermo Fisher) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 ug/ml streptomycin, 100 units/ml penicillin, and maintained in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. Fibroblasts were reprogrammed into iPSCs using Sendai reprogramming vectors (Beers, et al., 2015). Induced PSC lines were then cultured on Matrigel (Corning) coated 6-well plates in StemFlex medium (Gibco) in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. The iPSCs were passaged with 0.5 mM EDTA (Gibco) when cultures reached 70% confluency and at a 1:5 to 1:10 split ratio. After the first three passages, iPSCs were culture on and adapted to vitronectin (Gibco) coated 6-well plates in Essential 8 (E8; Gibco) medium for 7–8 passages. At each passage, cell culture media was supplemented with CEPT. The iPSCs were cryopreserved using E8 medium supplemented with 10% DMSO and CEPT.

4.2. Immunocytochemistry

The iPSCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in DPBS for 10 min at room temperature (RT). Cells were permeabilized and blocked with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 5% Bovine Serum Albumin in DPBS (Perm-Block Buffer) for 1 h at RT. All staining was performed in Perm-Block Buffer. Samples were then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and secondary antibodies in dark for 2 h at RT (Table 2). Nuclei were stained with 5 ng/ml Hoechst 33,342 (Thermo Fisher) diluted in DPBS for 10 min. Images were obtained with a Leica epifluorescence microscope.

4.3. Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from iPSCs using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) on a QIAcube Connect (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed into complementary DNA using the High-capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems). Predesigned PrimeTime Probe-based qPCR assays (IDT) (Table 2) were used to quantify gene expression using a QuantStudio 12 K Flex system (Applied Biosystems).

4.4. Mycoplasma detection

Detection of mycoplasma was performed using the MycoAlert PLUS Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza) using an aliquot of spent cell culture medium.

4.5. Sendai virus detection

After 7 to 13 passages on vitronectin-coated plates in E8 media, total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) on a QIAcube Connect (Qiagen). RNA (500 ng) was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA using the High-capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems). The Platinum SuperFi PCR Master Mix (Invitrogen) as used to amplify SEV, c-Myc, KOS and KLF4 target sequences, multiplexed with GAPDH as an internal control using the appropriate primers (Table 2) and the PCR program: 98 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 10 s, 72 °C for 30 s, followed by 72 °C for 5 min on a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad).

4.6. Mutation validation

Mutations at the HEXA and HEXB genes were verified by Sanger sequencing, following isolation of amplified PCR products generated using the appropriate primers for each gene (Table 2).

4.7. Short tandem repeat (STR) and karyotype analysis

STR analysis was performed by Cell Line Genetics (Madison, WI) using the GenePrint 24 system (Promega) with a five-dye profile of 23 STR loci and Amelogenin. High resolution karyotype analysis was performed by Cell Line Genetics (Madison, WI) using a SurePrint G3 (Agilent) human comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) 8X60K array.

4.8. Directed differentiation (Ectoderm, Mesoderm, endoderm and Hypothalamic neurons)

For differentiation into ectoderm and mesoderm, cells were plated onto VTN-coated plates at 5 × 104 cells/cm2 in E8 supplemented with CEPT. For differentiation into ectoderm, when 70% confluent, medium was changed to E6 with 100 nM LDN-193189 and 2 μM A83–01 and maintained with daily media changes until day 7, when assayed. For mesoderm and endoderm, cells were differentiated using mesoderm induction medium (STEMCELL Technologies), or the definitive endoderm kit (STEMCELL Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s protocol until assayed on day 5.

4.9. Western blot

For Western blot cells were pelleted and by lysed by sonication in RIPA Buffer (Thermo Scientific) supplemented with Halt protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific). Western blotting was performed using a Wes capillary system (ProteinSimple) and antibodies specified in Table 2.

Supplementary Material

MMC1
MMC2

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), NIH. The contribution of the NIH authors was made as part of their official duties as NIH federal employees, are in compliance with agency policy requirements, and are considered Works of the United States Government. However, the findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2026.103949. Supplementary Fig. 1. (A) RT-qPCR analysis demonstrates that all generated iPSC lines express OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG at levels comparable to previously established iPSC line LiPSC GR1.1 and below SOX2 expression levels of LiPSC GR1.1 line differentiated to ectoderm. (B) RT-PCR analysis of Sendai virus clearance at passage 10–13, using primers for SeV, c-Myc, KOS and Klf-4 in multiplex with GAPDH demonstrate that all iPSC lines were free of Sendai virus when compared to cells at passage 3 post viral transduction. (C) Immunocytochemistry of cells directed to differentiate into ectoderm (PAX6), mesoderm (Brachyury) and endoderm (SOX17). Scale bar is 75 μm.

Footnotes

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Vukasin M. Jovanovic: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Catherine Z. Chen: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology. Camilo Toro: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Funding acquisition. Kerstin A. Hurd: Data curation. Jizhong Zou: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Funding acquisition. Cynthia J Tifft: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Funding acquisition. Wei Zheng: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Funding acquisition. Mark J. Henderson: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Juan Marugan: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Carlos A. Tristan: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Toro C, Shirvan L, Tifft C 1999. HEXA Disorders. GeneReviews. Seattle, WA, University of Washington, Seattle. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Schultz ML, Tecedor L, Chang M, Davidson BL, 2011. Clarifying lysosomal storage diseases. Trends Neurosci. 34 (8), 401–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Picache JA, Zheng W, Chen CZ, 2022. Therapeutic strategies for Tay-Sachs Disease. Front. Pharmacol 13, 906647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beers J, Linask KL, Chen JA, Siniscalchi LI, Lin Y, Zheng W, Rao M, Chen G, 2015. A cost-effective and efficient reprogramming platform for large-scale production of integration-free human induced pluripotent stem cells in chemically defined culture. Sci. Rep 5 (1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Y, Tristan CA, Chen L, Jovanovic VM, Malley C, Chu PH, Ryu S, Deng T, Ormanoglu P, Tao D, et al. , 2021. A versatile polypharmacology platform promotes cytoprotection and viability of human pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nat. Methods 18, 528–541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

MMC1
MMC2

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

RESOURCES