Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2026 May 15;82(Pt 6):651–655. doi: 10.1107/S2056989026004482

Avutometinib

Jacob K Salazar a, James A Kaduk b,c,*, Anja Dosen d, Thomas N Blanton d
Editor: F F Ferreirae
PMCID: PMC13239010  PMID: 42254774

The crystal structure of avutometinib has been solved and refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data, and optimized using density functional theory techniques.

Keywords: powder diffraction, avutometinib, AVMAKI, Rietveld refinement, density functional theory, crystal structure

Abstract

The crystal structure of avutometinib (systematic name: 3-{[3-fluoro-2-(methyl­sulfamoyl­amino)­pyridin-4-yl]meth­yl}-4-methyl-7-(pyrimidin-2-yloxy)­chro­men-2-one), C21H18FN5O5S, has been solved and refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data, and optimized using density functional theory techniques. Avutometinib crystallizes in space group P1 (#2). The crystal structure is composed of layers parallel to the ab plane. N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the layers along the a-axis direction. The mol­ecule is Z-shaped.

1. Chemical context

Avutometinib (AVNAPKI) has been approved as a treatment for ovarian cancer. AVNAPKI is administered in capsule form as a co-medication with FAKZYNJA™ (defactinib tablets), for the treatment of KRAS-mutated recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer for patients that have previously received unsuccessful systemic therapy. The systematic name (CAS Registry Number 946128-88-7) is 3-{[3-fluoro-2-(methyl­sulfamoyl­amino)-4-pyridin­yl]meth­yl}-4-methyl-7-pyrimidin-2-yloxychromen-2-one.

We are unaware of any published powder diffraction data for avutometinib. This work was carried out as part of a project (Kaduk et al., 2014 ▸) to determine the crystal structures of large-volume commercial pharmaceuticals, and include high-quality powder diffraction data for them in the Powder Diffraction File (Kabekkodu et al., 2024 ▸).1.

2. Structural commentary

The root-mean-square difference of the non-H atoms in the Rietveld-refined and VASP-optimized structures of avutometinib, calculated using the Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020 ▸) CSD-Materials/Search/Crystal Packing Similarity tool is 0.059 Å (Fig. 1 ▸); the structures are essentially identical. The root-mean-square Cartesian displacement of the non-H atoms in the refined and optimized structures, calculated using the Mercury Calculate/Mol­ecule Overlay tool, is 0.053 Å (Fig. 2 ▸). The agreements are within the normal range for correct structures (van de Streek & Neumann, 2014 ▸). The asymmetric unit is illustrated in Fig. 3 ▸. The remaining discussion will emphasize the VASP-optimized structure.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison of the Rietveld-refined (colored by atom type) and VASP-optimized (pale green) structures of avutometinib, calculated using the Mercury CSD-Materials/Search/Crystal Packing Similarity tool. The root-mean-square Cartesian displacement is 0.059 Å. Image generated using Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020 ▸).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of the refined structure of avutometinib (red) to the VASP-optimized structure (blue). The comparison was generated using the Mercury Calculate/Mol­ecule Overlay tool; the r.m.s. difference is 0.053 Å. Image generated using Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020 ▸).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The asymmetric unit of avutometinib, with the atom numbering. The atoms are represented by 50% probability spheroids. Image generated using Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020 ▸).

All of the bond distances, bond angles, and torsion angles fall within the normal ranges indicated by a Mercury Mogul Geometry check (Macrae et al., 2020 ▸). Only the S1—N8 bond of 1.682 Å [average = 1.628 (17); Z-score = 3.1] is flagged as unusual. The unusual S—N bond distance is an example of a known feature of DFT calculations: too-long S—N bonds in the DFT optimization of sulfonamides have been observed (Kaduk et al., 2025 ▸; Vibha et al., 2023 ▸; Whitfield, 2025 ▸).

Quantum chemical geometry optimization of the isolated avutometinib mol­ecule (DFT/B3LYP/6-31G*/water) using Spartan ’24 (Wavefunction, 2025 ▸) indicated that the observed conformation is 5.7 kcal mol−1 higher in energy than a local minimum, which has a very similar conformation. The global minimum-energy conformation is 79.9 kcal mol−1 lower in energy, but is folded on itself to make intra­molecular hydrogen bonds. Inter­molecular inter­actions are thus important in determining the observed solid-state conformation.

3. Supra­molecular features

The crystal structure (Fig. 4 ▸) is composed of layers lying parallel to the ab plane. Hydrogen bonds link the layers along the b-axis direction (Table 1 ▸). The mol­ecule is Z-shaped. The mean plane of the pyridine ring near the sulfonamide group is approximately (011), the mean plane of the 2H-chromen-2-one ring system is approximately (01Inline graphic), and the mean plane of the pyrimidine ring is approximately (123). The Mercury Aromatics Analyser indicates one strong inter­action (d = 4.334 Å) between phenyl rings of the 2H-chromen-2-one ring system, and weaker inter­actions between multiple pairs of rings.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Crystal structure of avutometinib, viewed down the a-axis. Image generated using DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2025 ▸).

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A Mulliken overlap H-bond energy
N8—H44⋯O4i 1.04 1.95 2.961 165 0.054 5.4
N10—H45⋯O7ii 1.03 2.22 3.223 163 0.026 3.7
N10—H45⋯N9 1.03 2.49 2.977 108 0.011 –
C24—H41⋯O6iii 1.09 2.42 3.183 126 0.011 –
C33—H51⋯O6iv 1.09 2.35 3.170 131 0.015 –
C21—H39⋯N11i 1.09 2.80 3.882 170 0.012 –
C31—H49⋯N10iv 1.09 2.82 3.777 145 0.011 –

Symmetry codes: (i) x − 1, y, z; (ii) −x, −y, 1 − z; (iii) x + 1, y, z; (iv) x + 2, y, z − 1.

Analysis of the contributions to the total crystal energy of the structure using the Forcite module of Materials Studio (Dassault Systèmes, 2024 ▸) indicated that the intra­molecular energy is dominated by angle distortion terms, as might be expected for a mol­ecule containing a fused ring system. The inter­molecular energy is dominated by van der Waals attractions, which in this force field based analysis include hydrogen bonds. The hydrogen bonds are better discussed using the results of the DFT calculation.

There are two classical N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds in the structure (Table 1 ▸), one intra­molecular and one inter­molecular. The energies of these hydrogen bonds were calculated using the correlation of Wheatley and Kaduk (2019 ▸). The inter­molecular N8—H44⋯O4 hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into chains along the a-axis direction, with graph set C11(9) (Etter, 1990 ▸; Bernstein et al., 1995 ▸; Motherwell et al., 2000 ▸). A few C—H⋯O and C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds also contribute to the cohesion of the crystal.

The volume enclosed by the Hirshfeld surface of avutometinib (Fig. 5 ▸, Hirshfeld, 1977 ▸; Spackman et al., 2021 ▸) is 498.97 Å3, 98.27% of half of the unit-cell volume. The packing density is thus typical. The only significant close contacts (red in Fig. 5 ▸) involve the hydrogen bonds. The volume/non-hydrogen atom is smaller than normal, at 15.4 Å3.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The Hirshfeld surface of avutometinib. Inter­molecular contacts longer than the sums of the van der Waals radii are colored blue, and contacts shorter than the sums of the radii are colored red. Contacts equal to the sums of radii are white. Image generated using CrystalExplorer (Spackman et al., 2021 ▸).

The Bravais–Friedel–Donnay–Harker (Bravais, 1866 ▸; Friedel, 1907 ▸; Donnay and Harker, 1937 ▸) algorithm suggests that we might expect lozenge morphology for avutometinib, with {001} as the major faces. A 2nd-order spherical harmonic model for preferred orientation was included. The texture index was 1.002, indicating that the preferred orientation was insignificant in this rotated capillary specimen.

4. Database survey

A reduced cell search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom et al., 2016 ▸) yielded no hits.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

Avutometinib was a commercial reagent, purchased from Sigma (Batch #A245684-HA3), and was used as-received.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The white powder was packed into a 1.5 mm diameter Kapton capillary, and rotated during the measurement at ∼50 Hz. The powder pattern was measured at 295 K at beam line 11-BM (Lee et al., 2008 ▸; Wang et al., 2008 ▸; Antao et al., 2008 ▸) of the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory using a wavelength of 0.4687342 Å from 0.5–50° 2θ with a step size of 0.001° and a counting time of 0.1 sec/step. The high-resolution powder diffraction data were collected using twelve silicon crystal analyzers that allow for high angular resolution, high precision, and accurate peak positions. A mixture of silicon (NIST SRM 640c) and alumina (NIST SRM 676a) standards (ratio Al2O3:Si = 2:1 by weight) was used to calibrate the instrument and refine the monochromatic wavelength used in the experiment.

Table 2. Experimental details.

  avutometinib
Crystal data
Chemical formula C21H18FN5O5S
M r 471.46
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, PInline graphic
Temperature (K) 295
a, b, c (Å) 8.91097 (5), 9.47933 (5), 13.24641 (9)
α, β, γ (°) 83.9821 (4), 81.7759 (3), 66.67667 (9)
V (Å3) 1015.49 (1)
Z 2
Radiation type Synchrotron, λ = 0.46873 Å
μ (mm−1) 0.02
Specimen shape, size (mm) Cylinder, 2.0 × 1.5
 
Data collection
Diffractometer 11-BM, APS
Specimen mounting Kapton capillary
Data collection mode Transmission
Scan method Step
2θ values (°) 2θmin = 0.510, 2θmax = 49.995, 2θstep = 0.001
 
Refinement
R factors and goodness of fit Rp = 0.058, Rwp = 0.072, Rexp = 0.043, R(F2) = 0.06083, χ2 = 2.941
No. of parameters 136
No. of restraints 91
(Δ/σ)max 1.795

Computer programs: GSAS-II (Toby & Von Dreele, 2013 ▸).

The pattern was indexed on a high-quality primitive triclinic unit cell with a = 8.91271, b = 9.47911, c = 13.29736 Å, α = 83.91, β = 81.66, γ = 66.67°, V = 1019.23 Å3, and Z = 2 using JADE Pro (MDI, 2025 ▸). The space group was assumed to be PInline graphic, which was confirmed by successful solution and refinement of the structure.

The mol­ecular structure of avutometinib was downloaded from PubChem (Kim et al., 2023 ▸) as Conformer3D_COMPOUND_CID_16719221.sdf. It was converted to a *.mol2 file using Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020 ▸), and to a Fenske–Hall Z-matrix using OpenBabel (O’Boyle et al., 2011 ▸). The structure was solved using parallel tempering techniques as implemented in FOX (Favre-Nicolin & Černý, 2002 ▸).

Rietveld refinement was carried out using GSAS-II (Toby & Von Dreele, 2013 ▸). Only the 1.9–30.0° portion of the pattern was included in the refinements (dmin = 0.905 Å). The μR value was fixed at 0.02, calculated using the 11-BM web site (https://11bm.xray.aps.anl.gov/absorb/). All non-H bond distances and angles were subjected to restraints, based on a Mercury/Mogul Geometry Check (Sykes et al., 2011 ▸; Bruno et al., 2004 ▸). The Mogul average and standard deviation for each qu­antity were used as the restraint parameters. The aromatic rings were restrained to be planar. The restraints contributed 3.7% to the overall χ2. The hydrogen atoms were included in calculated positions, which were recalculated during the refinement using Materials Studio (Dassault Systèmes, 2024 ▸). The Uiso values were grouped by chemical similarity. The peak profiles were described using the generalized microstrain model (Stephens, 1999 ▸). The background was modeled using a six-term shifted Chebyshev polynomial, with a peak at 5.87° 2θ to model the scattering from the Kapton capillary and any amorphous component of the sample.

The final refinement of 136 variables using 28,101 observations and 91 restraints yielded the residuals Rwp = 0.0737 and GOF = 1.72. The largest peak (1.08 Å from C27) and hole (1.82 Å from N8) in the difference-Fourier map are 0.49 (11) and −0.46 (11) eÅ−3, respectively. The final Rietveld plot is shown in Fig. 6 ▸. The largest features in the normalized error plot are in the positions and shapes of some of the strong low-angle peaks, and may indicate a change of the specimen during the measurement.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The Rietveld plot for avutometinib. The blue crosses represent the observed data points, and the green line is the calculated pattern. The cyan curve is the normalized error plot, and the red line is the background curve. The blue tick marks indicate the peak positions. The vertical scale has been multiplied by a factor of 20× for 2θ > 15.7°.

The crystal structure of avutometinib was optimized (fixed experimental unit cell) with density functional theory techniques using VASP (Kresse & Furthmüller, 1996 ▸) through the MedeA graphical inter­face (Materials Design, 2024 ▸). The calculation was carried out on 32 cores of a 144-core (768 Gb memory) HPE Superdome Flex 280 Linux server at North Central College. The calculation used the GGA-PBE functional, a plane wave cutoff energy of 400.0 eV, and a k-point spacing of 0.5 Å−1 leading to a 2 × 2 × 1 mesh, and took ∼1.1 h. Single-point density functional theory calculations (fixed experimental cell) and population analysis were carried out using CRYSTAL23 (Erba et al., 2023 ▸). (fixed experimental cell) and population analysis were carried out using CRYSTAL17 (Dovesi et al., 2018 ▸). The basis sets for the H, C, N and O atoms in the calculation were those of Gatti et al. (1994 ▸), and those for F and S were those of Peintinger et al. (2013 ▸). The calculations were run on a 3.5 GHz PC using 8 k-points and the B3LYP functional, and took ∼2.7 h. The powder pattern has been submitted to ICDD for inclusion in the Powder Diffraction File.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) avutometinib, avutometinib_VASP. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026004482/ee2030sup1.cif

e-82-00651-sup1.cif (1.6MB, cif)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026004482/ee2030avutometinibsup2.cml

CCDC references: 2551067, 2551068

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

Use of the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. We thank Saul Lapidus for his assistance in the data collection. We also thank the ICDD team – Megan Rost, Steve Trimble, and Dave Bohnenberger – for their contribution to research, sample preparation, and in-house XRD data collection and verification.

supplementary crystallographic information

3-{[3-Fluoro-2-(methylsulfamoylamino)pyridin-4-yl]methyl}-4-methyl-7-(pyrimidin-2-yloxy)chromen-2-one (avutometinib). Crystal data

C21H18FN5O5S γ = 66.67667 (9)°
Mr = 471.46 V = 1015.49 (1) Å3
Triclinic, P1 Z = 2
a = 8.91097 (5) Å Dx = 1.542 Mg m−3
b = 9.47933 (5) Å Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.46873 Å
c = 13.24641 (9) Å µ = 0.02 mm−1
α = 83.9821 (4)° T = 295 K
β = 81.7759 (3)° cylinder, 2.0 × 1.5 mm

3-{[3-Fluoro-2-(methylsulfamoylamino)pyridin-4-yl]methyl}-4-methyl-7-(pyrimidin-2-yloxy)chromen-2-one (avutometinib). Data collection

11-BM, APS diffractometer Scan method: step
Specimen mounting: Kapton capillary 2θmin = 0.510°, 2θmax = 49.995°, 2θstep = 0.001°
Data collection mode: transmission

3-{[3-Fluoro-2-(methylsulfamoylamino)pyridin-4-yl]methyl}-4-methyl-7-(pyrimidin-2-yloxy)chromen-2-one (avutometinib). Refinement

Least-squares matrix: full 136 parameters
Rp = 0.058 91 restraints
Rwp = 0.072 27 constraints
Rexp = 0.043 Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s
R(F2) = 0.06083 (Δ/σ)max = 1.795
49486 data points Background function: Background function: "chebyschev-1" function with 6 terms: 39.70(6), -8.12(8), -5.86(7), 0.45(8), -3.44(7), -0.18(6), Background peak parameters: pos, int, sig, gam: 5.871(8), 5.48(8)e3, 4.80(12)e3, 0.100,
Profile function: Finger-Cox-Jephcoat function parameters U, V, W, X, Y, SH/L: peak variance(Gauss) = Utan(Th)2+Vtan(Th)+W: peak HW(Lorentz) = X/cos(Th)+Ytan(Th); SH/L = S/L+H/L U, V, W in (centideg)2, X & Y in centideg 1.163, -0.126, 0.063, 0.000, 0.000, 0.002, Preferred orientation correction: Simple spherical harmonic correction Order = 2 Coefficients: 0:0:C(2,-2) = 0.0570; 0:0:C(2,-1) = -0.0160; 0:0:C(2,0) = -0.0620; 0:0:C(2,1) = -0.0340; 0:0:C(2,2) = 0.0470

3-{[3-Fluoro-2-(methylsulfamoylamino)pyridin-4-yl]methyl}-4-methyl-7-(pyrimidin-2-yloxy)chromen-2-one (avutometinib). Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 −0.24645 (18) 0.18626 (18) 0.42794 (12) 0.0421 (6)*
F2 −0.0709 (3) 0.4497 (3) 0.18047 (17) 0.0346 (5)*
O3 0.7085 (3) 0.3231 (4) 0.0934 (2) 0.0365 (4)*
O4 0.5286 (3) 0.4613 (4) 0.2123 (2) 0.0365 (4)*
O5 1.1225 (4) 0.0538 (4) −0.1592 (2) 0.0466 (7)*
O6 −0.4215 (3) 0.2499 (3) 0.4256 (2) 0.0429 (9)*
O7 −0.1487 (3) 0.0326 (3) 0.4038 (2) 0.0429 (9)*
N8 −0.1842 (3) 0.2993 (4) 0.3460 (2) 0.0346 (5)*
N9 0.0824 (4) 0.1928 (4) 0.3953 (2) 0.0346 (5)*
N10 −0.2097 (4) 0.2032 (3) 0.5409 (2) 0.0407 (13)*
N11 1.3412 (4) 0.0840 (4) −0.2574 (3) 0.0466 (7)*
N12 1.0651 (3) 0.2462 (5) −0.2842 (3) 0.0466 (7)*
C13 0.4224 (3) 0.3609 (5) 0.0948 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C14 0.4605 (3) 0.2760 (5) 0.0115 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C15 0.2494 (3) 0.4418 (3) 0.1438 (3) 0.0346 (5)*
C16 0.6307 (3) 0.2123 (5) −0.0350 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C17 0.1945 (3) 0.3467 (5) 0.2286 (3) 0.0346 (5)*
C18 0.7480 (3) 0.2434 (6) 0.0065 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C19 0.5500 (3) 0.3855 (5) 0.1392 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C20 0.3333 (4) 0.2424 (5) −0.0335 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C21 0.6807 (4) 0.1290 (6) −0.1232 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C22 0.9097 (4) 0.1913 (5) −0.0337 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C23 0.0353 (3) 0.3584 (5) 0.2461 (3) 0.0346 (5)*
C24 0.3001 (3) 0.2514 (5) 0.2970 (3) 0.0346 (5)*
C25 0.9547 (4) 0.1156 (5) −0.1231 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C26 0.8430 (4) 0.0789 (6) −0.1659 (3) 0.0365 (4)*
C27 −0.0221 (3) 0.2850 (5) 0.3307 (3) 0.0346 (5)*
C28 0.2402 (4) 0.1795 (5) 0.3777 (3) 0.0346 (5)*
C29 1.1788 (4) 0.1324 (5) −0.2371 (3) 0.0466 (7)*
C30 −0.2810 (6) 0.3515 (4) 0.5876 (3) 0.0407 (13)*
C31 1.3927 (3) 0.1638 (6) −0.3335 (4) 0.0466 (7)*
C32 1.1255 (5) 0.3191 (5) −0.3622 (3) 0.0466 (7)*
C33 1.2907 (6) 0.2808 (6) −0.3893 (3) 0.0466 (7)*
H34 0.23891 0.55099 0.17829 0.0415*
H35 0.16192 0.47507 0.08245 0.0415*
H36 0.20524 0.32410 −0.00294 0.0438*
H37 0.34758 0.11858 −0.01145 0.0438*
H38 0.35062 0.25904 −0.12025 0.0438*
H39 0.58774 0.10215 −0.16017 0.0438*
H40 1.00374 0.21103 0.00682 0.0438*
H41 0.43511 0.23367 0.28555 0.0437*
H42 0.88436 0.00750 −0.23630 0.0438*
H43 0.33257 0.10460 0.43208 0.0437*
H44 −0.26680 0.38460 0.30380 0.0437*
H45 −0.24990 0.13320 0.59250 0.0489*
H46 −0.17896 0.37943 0.61243 0.0489*
H47 −0.37075 0.34632 0.65705 0.0489*
H48 −0.34902 0.44468 0.52986 0.0489*
H49 1.52990 0.13446 −0.35462 0.0559*
H50 1.03796 0.41730 −0.40887 0.0559*
H51 1.34347 0.34168 −0.45476 0.0559*

3-{[3-Fluoro-2-(methylsulfamoylamino)pyridin-4-yl]methyl}-4-methyl-7-(pyrimidin-2-yloxy)chromen-2-one (avutometinib). Geometric parameters (Å, º)

S1—O6 1.4366 (19) C22—C25 1.376 (2)
S1—O7 1.413 (2) C22—H40 1.140 (3)
S1—N8 1.640 (2) C23—F2 1.353 (2)
S1—N10 1.6130 (18) C23—C17 1.365 (2)
F2—C23 1.353 (2) C23—C27 1.3987 (18)
O3—C18 1.369 (2) C24—C17 1.386 (2)
O3—C19 1.3724 (18) C24—C28 1.365 (3)
O4—C19 1.213 (3) C24—H41 1.136 (2)
O5—C25 1.403 (3) C25—O5 1.403 (3)
O5—C29 1.363 (3) C25—C22 1.376 (2)
O6—S1 1.4366 (19) C25—C26 1.383 (3)
O7—S1 1.413 (2) C26—C21 1.384 (3)
N8—S1 1.640 (2) C26—C25 1.383 (3)
N8—C27 1.383 (2) C26—H42 1.140 (3)
N8—H44 1.030 (3) C27—N8 1.383 (2)
N9—C27 1.338 (2) C27—N9 1.338 (2)
N9—C28 1.349 (3) C27—C23 1.3987 (18)
N10—S1 1.6130 (18) C28—N9 1.349 (3)
N10—C30 1.459 (2) C28—C24 1.365 (3)
N10—H45 1.029 (3) C28—H43 1.140 (3)
N11—C29 1.3283 (17) C29—O5 1.363 (3)
N11—C31 1.335 (3) C29—N11 1.3283 (17)
N12—C29 1.3248 (17) C29—N12 1.3248 (17)
N12—C32 1.349 (3) C30—N10 1.459 (2)
C13—C14 1.357 (2) C30—H46 1.140 (4)
C13—C15 1.506 (2) C30—H47 1.140 (4)
C13—C19 1.457 (3) C30—H48 1.140 (5)
C14—C13 1.357 (2) C31—N11 1.335 (3)
C14—C16 1.459 (2) C31—C33 1.351 (3)
C14—C20 1.504 (2) C31—H49 1.140 (3)
C15—C13 1.506 (2) C32—N12 1.349 (3)
C15—C17 1.515 (2) C32—C33 1.371 (3)
C15—H34 1.140 (3) C32—H50 1.140 (3)
C15—H35 1.140 (3) C33—C31 1.351 (3)
C16—C14 1.459 (2) C33—C32 1.371 (3)
C16—C18 1.388 (2) C33—H51 1.140 (3)
C16—C21 1.397 (2) H34—C15 1.140 (3)
C17—C15 1.515 (2) H35—C15 1.140 (3)
C17—C23 1.365 (2) H36—C20 1.140 (4)
C17—C24 1.386 (2) H37—C20 1.140 (5)
C18—O3 1.369 (2) H38—C20 1.140 (4)
C18—C16 1.388 (2) H39—C21 1.140 (3)
C18—C22 1.369 (3) H40—C22 1.140 (3)
C19—O3 1.3724 (18) H41—C24 1.136 (2)
C19—O4 1.213 (3) H42—C26 1.140 (3)
C19—C13 1.457 (3) H43—C28 1.140 (3)
C20—C14 1.504 (2) H44—N8 1.030 (3)
C20—H36 1.140 (4) H45—N10 1.029 (3)
C20—H37 1.140 (5) H46—C30 1.140 (4)
C20—H38 1.140 (4) H47—C30 1.140 (4)
C21—C16 1.397 (2) H48—C30 1.140 (5)
C21—C26 1.384 (3) H49—C31 1.140 (3)
C21—H39 1.140 (3) H50—C32 1.140 (3)
C22—C18 1.369 (3) H51—C33 1.140 (3)
O6—S1—O7 121.73 (17) H36—C20—H38 109.5 (4)
O6—S1—N8 103.46 (18) H37—C20—H38 109.5 (3)
O7—S1—N8 107.88 (19) C16—C21—C26 120.21 (16)
O6—S1—N10 108.15 (18) C16—C21—H39 120.0 (2)
O7—S1—N10 105.89 (17) C26—C21—H39 119.8 (3)
N8—S1—N10 109.38 (17) C18—C22—C25 118.60 (17)
C18—O3—C19 122.01 (12) C18—C22—H40 120.0 (2)
C25—O5—C29 118.2 (3) C25—C22—H40 121.4 (2)
S1—N8—C27 122.28 (18) F2—C23—C17 117.97 (14)
S1—N8—H44 120.1 (2) F2—C23—C27 119.41 (14)
C27—N8—H44 117.7 (2) C17—C23—C27 122.57 (11)
C27—N9—C28 117.74 (16) C17—C24—C28 119.33 (12)
S1—N10—C30 121.0 (2) C17—C24—H41 120.0 (2)
S1—N10—H45 109.5 (2) C28—C24—H41 120.7 (3)
C30—N10—H45 103.5 (3) O5—C25—C22 117.7 (3)
C29—N11—C31 114.62 (10) O5—C25—C26 120.7 (3)
C29—N12—C32 114.34 (10) C22—C25—C26 120.73 (16)
C14—C13—C15 123.60 (17) C21—C26—C25 119.86 (16)
C14—C13—C19 120.69 (10) C21—C26—H42 120.1 (3)
C15—C13—C19 115.64 (17) C25—C26—H42 120.1 (3)
C13—C14—C16 119.32 (10) N8—C27—N9 119.01 (15)
C13—C14—C20 122.09 (13) N8—C27—C23 121.04 (14)
C16—C14—C20 118.57 (13) N9—C27—C23 119.86 (10)
C13—C15—C17 114.1 (2) N9—C28—C24 124.01 (15)
C13—C15—H34 109.5 (2) N9—C28—H43 120.0 (3)
C17—C15—H34 107.1 (3) C24—C28—H43 116.0 (3)
C13—C15—H35 108.7 (3) O5—C29—N11 116.0 (3)
C17—C15—H35 108.7 (2) O5—C29—N12 116.1 (3)
H34—C15—H35 108.7 (2) N11—C29—N12 127.94 (13)
C14—C16—C18 118.57 (10) N10—C30—H46 109.4 (4)
C14—C16—C21 123.50 (15) N10—C30—H47 109.5 (4)
C18—C16—C21 117.81 (14) H46—C30—H47 109.5 (3)
C15—C17—C23 121.66 (17) N10—C30—H48 109.4 (3)
C15—C17—C24 121.79 (17) H46—C30—H48 109.5 (4)
C23—C17—C24 116.40 (10) H47—C30—H48 109.5 (4)
O3—C18—C16 121.12 (11) N11—C31—C33 123.81 (16)
O3—C18—C22 116.32 (15) N11—C31—H49 120.0 (4)
C16—C18—C22 122.50 (15) C33—C31—H49 116.2 (4)
O3—C19—O4 115.99 (17) N12—C32—C33 122.95 (16)
O3—C19—C13 118.12 (12) N12—C32—H50 120.0 (4)
O4—C19—C13 125.85 (17) C33—C32—H50 117.1 (4)
C14—C20—H36 109.5 (2) C31—C33—C32 116.29 (17)
C14—C20—H37 109.5 (4) C31—C33—H51 120.0 (4)
H36—C20—H37 109.5 (3) C32—C33—H51 123.7 (4)
C14—C20—H38 109.5 (3)

(avutometinib_VASP). Crystal data

C21H18FN5O5S α = 83.98°
Mr = 471.46 β = 81.78°
Triclinic, P1 γ = 66.68°
a = 8.91097 Å V = 1015.53 Å3
b = 9.47933 Å Z = 2
c = 13.24641 Å

(avutometinib_VASP). Data collection

h = → l = →
k = →

(avutometinib_VASP). Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Biso*/Beq
S1 −0.24757 0.18753 0.42895
F2 −0.07477 0.45568 0.17671
O3 0.71646 0.31732 0.09192
O4 0.53929 0.45121 0.21599
O5 1.12701 0.05321 −0.16336
O6 −0.42292 0.24813 0.42629
O7 −0.14823 0.03113 0.40340
N8 −0.19006 0.30945 0.34680
N9 0.07524 0.19945 0.39447
N10 −0.21091 0.20419 0.54292
N11 1.34192 0.08760 −0.25877
N12 1.06472 0.25390 −0.28664
C13 0.42895 0.35914 0.09446
C14 0.46617 0.27131 0.01093
C15 0.25568 0.44005 0.14351
C16 0.63371 0.20853 −0.03693
C17 0.19668 0.34780 0.22776
C18 0.75384 0.23729 0.00578
C19 0.55739 0.38083 0.13895
C20 0.33632 0.24377 −0.03426
C21 0.68522 0.12449 −0.12629
C22 0.91658 0.18843 −0.03742
C23 0.03348 0.36349 0.24311
C24 0.30019 0.24992 0.29808
C25 0.96096 0.10896 −0.12596
C26 0.84706 0.07495 −0.17096
C27 −0.02552 0.28926 0.32727
C28 0.23404 0.17983 0.37918
C29 1.17844 0.13683 −0.24060
C30 −0.28532 0.35499 0.58704
C31 1.39657 0.16416 −0.33617
C32 1.12400 0.32658 −0.36442
C33 1.29130 0.28551 −0.39322
H34 0.24832 0.54394 0.17773
H35 0.16996 0.48068 0.08520
H36 0.22340 0.27002 0.01837
H37 0.37818 0.12413 −0.05544
H38 0.30606 0.31650 −0.10496
H39 0.59597 0.09911 −0.16153
H40 1.00632 0.21209 −0.00181
H41 0.42946 0.23167 0.29139
H42 0.88621 0.01237 −0.24077
H43 0.31035 0.10618 0.43672
H44 −0.27345 0.36968 0.29517
H45 −0.08805 0.14370 0.55085
H46 −0.22639 0.43396 0.55260
H47 −0.27350 0.33849 0.66903
H48 −0.41643 0.40770 0.57712
H49 1.52997 0.12683 −0.35303
H50 1.03244 0.42144 −0.40429
H51 1.33943 0.34281 −0.45717

(avutometinib_VASP). Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N8—H44···O4i 1.036 1.947 2.961 165.2
N10—H45···O7ii 1.030 2.222 3.223 163.4
N10—H45···N9 1.030 2.491 2.977 108.1
C24—H41···O6iii 1.087 2.417 3.183 126.3
C33—H51···O6iv 1.087 2.350 3.170 130.9
C21—H39···N11i 1.091 2.803 3.882 170.3
C31—H49···N10iv 1.094 2.826 3.777 145.3

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1, y, z; (ii) −x, −y, −z+1; (iii) x+1, y, z; (iv) x+2, y, z−1.

Funding Statement

Funding for this research was provided by: International Centre for Diffraction Data (grant No. 09-03).

References

  1. Antao, S. M., Hassan, I., Wang, J., Lee, P. L. & Toby, B. H. (2008). Can. Mineral.46, 1501–1509.
  2. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N. L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.34, 1555–1573.
  3. K. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2025). DIAMOND V 5.1.1. Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany.
  4. Bravais, A. (1866). Etudes Cristallographiques. Paris: Gauthier Villars.
  5. Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Kessler, M., Luo, J., Motherwell, W. D. S., Purkis, L. H., Smith, B. R., Taylor, R., Cooper, R. I., Harris, S. E. & Orpen, A. G. (2004). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.44, 2133–2144. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Dassault Systèmes. (2024). BIOVIA Materials Studio 2025. BIOVIA, San Diego, CA
  7. Donnay, J. D. H. & Harker, D. (1937). Am. Mineral.22, 446-467.
  8. Dovesi, R., Erba, A., Orlando, R., Zicovich-Wilson, C. M., Civalleri, B., Maschio, L., Rérat, M., Casassa, S., Baima, J., Salustro, S. & Kirtman, B. (2018). WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.8, e1360.
  9. Erba, A., Desmarais, J. K., Casassa, S., Civalleri, B., Donà, L., Bush, I. J., Searle, B., Maschio, L., Edith-Daga, L., Cossard, A., Ribaldone, C., Ascrizzi, E., Marana, N. L., Flament, J.-P. & Kirtman, B. (2023). J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 6891–6932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res.23, 120–126.
  11. Favre-Nicolin, V. & Černý, R. (2002). J. Appl. Cryst.35, 734–743.
  12. Friedel, G. (1907). Bull. Soc. Française Minéral.30, 326–455.
  13. Gatti, C., Saunders, V. R. & Roetti, C. (1994). J. Chem. Phys.101, 10686–10696.
  14. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Hirshfeld, F. L. (1977). Theor. Chim. Acta44, 129–138.
  16. Kabekkodu, S., Dosen, A. & Blanton, T. N. (2024). Powder Diffr.39, 47–59.
  17. Kaduk, J. A., Crowder, C. E., Zhong, K., Fawcett, T. G. & Suchomel, M. R. (2014). Powder Diffr.29, 269–273.
  18. Kaduk, J. A., Dosen, A. & Blanton, T. N. (2025). Powder Diffr.40, 168–174.
  19. Kim, S., Chen, J., Cheng, T., Gindulyte, A., He, J., He, S., Li, Q., Shoemaker, B. A., Thiessen, P. A., Yu, B., Zaslavsky, L., Zhang, J. & Bolton, E. E. (2023). Nucleic Acids Res.51, D1373–D1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. (1996). Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15–50.
  21. Lee, P. L., Shu, D., Ramanathan, M., Preissner, C., Wang, J., Beno, M. A., Von Dreele, R. B., Ribaud, L., Kurtz, C., Antao, S. M., Jiao, X. & Toby, B. H. (2008). J. Synchrotron Rad.15, 427–432. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Macrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst.53, 226–235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Materials Design. (2024). MedeA 3.7.2. Materials Design Inc., San Diego, USA.
  24. MDI. (2025). JADE Pro version 9.3. Materials Data, Livermore, USA.
  25. Motherwell, W. D. S., Shields, G. P. & Allen, F. H. (2000). Acta Cryst. B56, 857–871. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. O’Boyle, N. M., Banck, M., James, C. A., Morley, C., Vandermeersch, T. & Hutchison, G. R. (2011). J. Cheminform3, 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  27. Peintinger, M. F., Oliveira, D. V. & Bredow, T. (2013). J. Comput. Chem.34, 451–459. [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Spackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst.54, 1006–1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  29. Stephens, P. W. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.32, 281–289.
  30. Streek, J. van de & Neumann, M. A. (2014). Acta Cryst. B70, 1020–1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  31. Sykes, R. A., McCabe, P., Allen, F. H., Battle, G. M., Bruno, I. J. & Wood, P. A. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst.44, 882–886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  32. Toby, B. H. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2013). J. Appl. Cryst.46, 544–549.
  33. Vibha, K., Prachality, N. C., Reddy, R. A., Ravikantha, M. N. & Thipperudrappa, J. (2023). Chem. Phys. Impact6, 100147.
  34. Wang, J., Toby, B. H., Lee, P. L., Ribaud, L., Antao, S. M., Kurtz, C., Ramanathan, M., Von Dreele, R. B. & Beno, M. A. (2008). Rev. Sci. Instrum.79, 085105. [DOI] [PubMed]
  35. Wavefunction (2025). Spartan ’24. V. 1.3.1. Wavefunction Inc., Irvine, USA.
  36. Wheatley, A. M. & Kaduk, J. A. (2019). Powder Diffr.34, 35–43.
  37. Whitfield, P. S. (2025). 18th Pharmaceutical Powder X-ray Diffraction Symposium, Cambridge UK.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) avutometinib, avutometinib_VASP. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026004482/ee2030sup1.cif

e-82-00651-sup1.cif (1.6MB, cif)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026004482/ee2030avutometinibsup2.cml

CCDC references: 2551067, 2551068

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES